PROSAFE: a European endeavor to improve quality of critical care medicine in seven countries

A Secondary Retrospective Analysis of the Predictive Value of Neutrophil-Reactive Intensity (NEUT-RI) in Septic and Non-Septic Patients in Intensive Care

BACKGROUND

Effective identification and management in the early stages of sepsis are critical for achieving positive outcomes. In this context, neutrophil-reactive intensity (NEUT-RI) emerges as a promising and easily interpretable parameter. This study aimed to assess the predictive value of NEUT-RI in diagnosing sepsis and to evaluate its prognostic significance in distinguishing 28-day mortality outcomes.

MATERIALS

This study is a secondary, retrospective, observational analysis. Clinical data upon ICU admission were collected. We enrolled septic patients and a control group of critically ill patients without sepsis criteria. The patients were divided into subgroups based on renal function for biomarker evaluation with 28-day outcomes reported for septic and non-septic patients.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were included in this study. A significant difference between the "septic" and "non-septic" groups was detected in the NEUT-RI plasma concentration (53.80 [49.65-59.05] vs. 48.00 [46.00-49.90] FI, p < 0.001, respectively). NEUT-RI and procalcitonin (PCT) distinguished between not complicated sepsis and septic shock (PCT 1.71 [0.42-12.09] vs. 32.59 [8.83-100.00], <0.001 and NEUT-RI 51.50 [47.80-56.30] vs. 56.20 [52.30-61.92], p = 0.005). NEUT-RI, PCT, and CRP values were significantly different in patients with "renal failure". NEUT-RI and PCT at admission in the ICU in the septic group were higher in patients who died (58.80 [53.85-73.10] vs. 53.05 [48.90-57.22], p = 0.005 and 39.56 [17.39-83.72] vs. 3.22 [0.59-32.32], p = 0.002, respectively). Both NEUT-RI and PCT showed a high negative predictive value and low positive predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

The inflammatory biomarkers assessed in this study offer valuable support in the early diagnosis of sepsis and could have a possible role in anticipating the outcome. NEUT-RI elevation appears particularly promising for early sepsis detection and severity discrimination upon admission.

The effects of venovenous bypass use in liver transplantation with piggyback technique: a propensity score-weighted analysis

Venovenous bypass (VVB) use during liver transplantation (LT) is notably variable among the centres and it is actually restricted to surgically complex cases, severely unstable recipients or grafts from high-risk donors. Historically, VVB was associated with the classical LT with caval cross clamping, while not much is known about the safety of this technique applied to piggyback LT. This retrospective observational study evaluated the effects of VVB applied to piggyback LT on mortality, hospital outcomes, postoperative graft and other organ dysfunction. We retrospectively collected data about recipient status, surgical complexity and graft quality of all the piggyback LTs performed at the Transplant Unit of IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy, from January 2012 to December 2022. A propensity score (PS) was built taking into account the variables possibly associated with either VVB choice and the investigated outcomes with the average treatment overlap method. PS-weighted general linear models (GLMs) were developed to investigate the adjusted effect of VVB use on the selected outcomes. The final analysis included 874 LT cases, of whom 74 (8.5%) underwent VVB. The effective sample sizes after PS-weighting were 280.2 and 64.3 patients in the no-VVB and VVB groups, respectively. PS-weighted GLMs did not show any differences regarding hospital and graft-related outcomes. However, significantly higher odds ratios for serum creatinine > 2 mg/dL and AKIN stage 2 or 3 during the first 24 h after ICU admission together with a higher renal replacement therapy need during ICU stay were reported for VVB exposure in the weighted analyses. This study suggests similar mortality and length of stay but a higher risk for postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing piggyback LT with VVB.

Assess and validate predictive performance of models for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands comparing the value of registry data with high-granular electronic health records

PURPOSE

To assess, validate and compare the predictive performance of models for in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) over two different waves of infections. Our models were built with high-granular Electronic Health Records (EHR) data versus less-granular registry data.

METHODS

Observational study of all COVID-19 patients admitted to 19 Dutch ICUs participating in both the national quality registry National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) and the EHR-based Dutch Data Warehouse (hereafter EHR). Multiple models were developed on data from the first 24 h of ICU admissions from February to June 2020 (first COVID-19 wave) and validated on prospective patients admitted to the same ICUs between July and December 2020 (second COVID-19 wave). We assessed model discrimination, calibration, and the degree of relatedness between development and validation population. Coefficients were used to identify relevant risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 1533 patients from the EHR and 1563 from the registry were included. With high granular EHR data, the average AUROC was 0.69 (standard deviation of 0.05) for the internal validation, and the AUROC was 0.75 for the temporal validation. The registry model achieved an average AUROC of 0.76 (standard deviation of 0.05) in the internal validation and 0.77 in the temporal validation. In the EHR data, age, and respiratory-system related variables were the most important risk factors identified. In the NICE registry data, age and chronic respiratory insufficiency were the most important risk factors.

CONCLUSION

In our study, prognostic models built on less-granular but readily-available registry data had similar performance to models built on high-granular EHR data and showed similar transportability to a prospective COVID-19 population. Future research is needed to verify whether this finding can be confirmed for upcoming waves.

Effectiveness of an Active and Continuous Surveillance Program for Intensive Care Units Infections Based on the EPIC III (Extended Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care) Approach

We evaluated the effectiveness of the Extended Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) III data collection protocol as an active surveillance tool in the eight Intensive Care Units (ICUs) of the Intensive and Critical Care Department of the University Hospital of Turin. A total of 435 patients were included in a six-day study over 72 ICU beds. 42% had at least one infection: 69% at one site, 26% at two sites and 5% at three or more sites. ICU-acquired infections were the most common (64%), followed by hospital-associated infections (22%) and community-acquired (20%), considering that each patient may have developed more than one infection type. 72% of patients were receiving at least one antibiotic: 48% for prophylaxis and 52% for treatment. Mortality, the length of ICU and hospital stays were 13%, 14 and 29 days, respectively, being all estimated to be significantly different in patients without and with infection (8% vs. 20%; 4 vs. 20 and 11 vs. 50 (p < 0.001). Our data confirm a high prevalence of infections, sepsis and the use of antimicrobials. The repeated punctual prevalence survey seems an effective method to carry out the surveillance of infections and the use of antimicrobials in the ICU. The use of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) definitions and the EPIC III protocol seems strategic to allow comparisons with national and international contexts.

Differences in early, intermediate, and long-term mortality among elderly patients admitted to the ICU. Results of a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated both short- and long-term prognostic factors, and the differences between chronic and acute conditions in the very old critically-ill patient. Our study aims to shed light in this field and to provide useful prognostic factors that may support clinical decisions in the management of the elderly.

METHODS

Six ICUs collected data concerning patients 80 years old or more admitted in 2015 and 2016 and followed-up until may 2018. Three prognostic models were developed: an in-hospital mortality model, a model for patients discharged from the hospital and entering follow-up, and an intermediate model for those alive after three days from ICU admission.

RESULTS

Our centers admitted 1189 patients, 1071 (90.1%) had survived after three days from admission, 889 (74.8%) were discharged from the hospital, 701 (59.0%) survived six months after hospital discharge, 539 (45.3%) survived at the end of follow-up. Among survivors the median follow-up time was 810 days. Acute organ failures were the main causes of death in the hospital mortality multivariable model. These factors are modifiable and potentially a target for intervention to improve outcome. The model focused on mortality six months after hospital in patients that survived a three-day timelimited trial, showed a clear shift toward chronic diseases, unmodifiable factors crucial for prognostic assessment. This trend was even more evident at the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Among very old ICU patients, prognostic factors shift from acute to chronic conditions in passing from in-hospital to post-hospital outcomes.

Hospitals with and without neurosurgery: a comparative study evaluating the outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury

BACKGROUND

We leveraged the data of the international CREACTIVE consortium to investigate whether the outcome of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) in hospitals without on-site neurosurgical capabilities (no-NSH) would differ had the same patients been admitted to ICUs in hospitals with neurosurgical capabilities (NSH).

METHODS

The CREACTIVE observational study enrolled more than 8000 patients from 83 ICUs. Adult TBI patients admitted to no-NSH ICUs within 48 h of trauma were propensity-score matched 1:3 with patients admitted to NSH ICUs. The primary outcome was the 6-month extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS-E), while secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 232 patients, less than 5% of the eligible cohort, were admitted to no-NSH ICUs. Each of them was matched to 3 NSH patients, leading to a study sample of 928 TBI patients where the no-NSH and NSH groups were well-balanced with respect to all of the variables included into the propensity score. Patients admitted to no-NSH ICUs experienced significantly higher ICU and in-hospital mortality. Compared to the matched NSH ICU admissions, their 6-month GOS-E scores showed a significantly higher prevalence of upper good recovery for cases with mild TBI and low expected mortality risk at admission, along with a progressively higher incidence of poor outcomes with increased TBI severity and mortality risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, centralization of TBI patients significantly impacted short- and long-term outcomes. For TBI patients admitted to no-NSH centers, our results suggest that the least critically ill can effectively be managed in centers without neurosurgical capabilities. Conversely, the most complex patients would benefit from being treated in high-volume, neuro-oriented ICUs.

A Strategy for Hospital Pharmacists to Control Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in Japan

In Japan, there is concern regarding the relation between the inappropriate use of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance (AMR). Increased bacterial resistance is due in part to the inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents. The support of the pharmacist becomes important, and there is growing interest in antimicrobial stewardship to promote the appropriate and safe use of antimicrobials needed for the optimal selection of drugs, doses, durations of therapy, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), and implementations of cost containment strategies in Japan. Pharmacists should strive to disseminate the concept of "choosing wisely" in relation to all medicines, implement further interventions, and put them into practice. In this article, we present data for antimicrobial stewardship and Japan's AMR action plan, focusing on how pharmacists should be involved in enabling physicians to choose antimicrobials wisely.

High dose coupled plasma filtration and adsorption in septic shock patients. Results of the COMPACT-2: a multicentre, adaptive, randomised clinical trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of high-dose (> 0.2 L/kg of treated plasma per day) coupled plasma filtration-adsorption (CPFA) in treating patients with septic shock.

METHODS

Multicentre, randomised, adaptive trial, performed in 12 Italian intensive care units (ICUs). Patients aged 14 or more, admitted to the ICU with septic shock, or had developed it during the stay were eligible. The final outcome was mortality at discharge from the last hospital at which the patient received care.

RESULTS

Between May 2015, and October 2017, 115 patients were randomised. The first interim analysis revealed a number of early deaths, prompting an unplanned analysis. Last hospital mortality was non-significantly higher in the CPFA (55.6%) than in the control group (46.2%, p = 0.35). The 90-day survival curves diverged in favour of the controls early after randomisation and remained separated afterwards (p = 0.100). An unplanned analysis showed higher mortality in CPFA compared to controls among patients without severe renal failure (p = 0.025); a dose-response relationship was observed between treated plasma volume and mortality (p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

The COMPACT-2 trial was stopped due to the possible harmful effect of CPFA in patients with septic shock. The harmful effect, if present, was particularly marked in the early phase of septic shock. Patients not requiring renal replacement therapy seemed most exposed to the possible harm, with evidence of a dose-response effect. Until the mechanisms behind these results are fully understood, the use of CPFA for the treatment of patients with septic shock is not recommended.