Prognostic role of automatic pupillometry in sepsis: a retrospective study

Management of severe acute encephalopathy in the ICU: an expert consensus statement from the french society of intensive care medicine

INTRODUCTION

Acute encephalopathy in the ICU poses significant diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic challenges. Standardized expert guidelines on acute encephalopathy are needed to improve diagnostic methods, therapeutic decisions, and prognostication.

METHODS

The experts conducted a review of the literature, analysed it according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology and made proposals for guidelines, which were rated by other experts. Only expert opinions with strong agreement were selected.

RESULTS

The synthesis of expert work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 39 recommendations. Among the 39 formalized recommendations, 1 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1 +) and 10 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2 + or 2-). These recommendations describe indication for ICU admission, use of clinical scores and EEG for diagnosis, detection of complications, and prognostication. The remaining 28 recommendations were based on expert consensus. These recomandations describe common indications for blood and CSF studies, neuroimaging, use of neuromonitoring, and provide guidelines for management in the acute phase.

CONCLUSION

This expert consensus statement aims to provide a structured framework to enhance the consistency and quality of care for ICU patients presenting with acute encephalopathy. By integrating high-quality evidence with expert opinion, it offers a pragmatic approach to addressing the complex nature of acute encephalopathy in the ICU, promoting best practices in patient care and facilitating future research in the field.

The prognostic role of Neurologic Pupil Index in COVID-19 patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Neurological complications have been observed in approximately 30% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether early assessment of the Neurological Pupil Index (NPiTM) derived from an automated pupillometry could predict mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of adult critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit of a University Hospital; patients without NPi measurement were excluded. The worst NPi (i.e. lowest value from one eye) was collected daily and then computed over the first five days of assessment. Mortality was assessed at hospital discharge. The secondary endpoint involved assessing differences in neurological assessments between patients who developed neurological complications and those who did not.

RESULTS

A total of 217 patients were included over the study period (median age 61 [50-68] years), 70% were males. A total of 97 patients (45%) died during the hospital stay. Among all patients, 35 (16%) experienced neurological complications. Non-survivors showed significantly a lower overall NPi (3.0 [2.0-4.1] vs. 3.4 [2.7-4.2]; P=0.04) than survivors. At multivariate logistic regression NPi was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Moreover, no differences in different NPi measurements were observed between patients with and without neurological complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, NPi values were not independent predictor of mortality and neurological complications in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Quantitative Pupillometry: Clinical Applications for the Internist

From the time of Galen, examination of the pupillary light reflex has been a standard of care across the continuum of health care. The growing body of evidence overwhelmingly supports the use of quantitative pupillometry over subjective examination with flashlight or penlight. At current time, pupillometers have become standard of care in many hospitals across 6 continents. This review paper provides an overview and rationale for pupillometer use and highlights literature supporting pupillometer-derived measures of the pupillary light reflex in both neurological and non-neurological patients across the health care continuum.

Acute encephalopathy in the ICU: a practical approach

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute encephalopathy (AE) - which frequently develops in critically ill patients with and without primary brain injury - is defined as an acute process that evolves rapidly and leads to changes in baseline cognitive status, ranging from delirium to coma. The diagnosis, monitoring, and management of AE is challenging. Here, we discuss advances in definitions, diagnostic approaches, therapeutic options, and implications to outcomes of the clinical spectrum of AE in ICU patients without primary brain injury.

RECENT FINDINGS

Understanding and definitions of delirium and coma have evolved. Delirium is a neurocognitive disorder involving impairment of attention and cognition, usually fluctuating, and developing over hours to days. Coma is a state of unresponsiveness, with absence of command following, intelligible speech, or visual pursuit, with no imaging or neurophysiological evidence of cognitive motor dissociation. The CAM-ICU(-7) and the ICDSC are validated, guideline-recommended tools for clinical delirium assessment, with identification of clinical subtypes and stratification of severity. In comatose patients, the roles of continuous EEG monitoring and neuroimaging have grown for the early detection of secondary brain injury and treatment of reversible causes.

SUMMARY

Evidence-based pharmacologic treatments for delirium are limited. Dexmedetomidine is effective for mechanically ventilated patients with delirium, while haloperidol has minimal effect of delirium but may have other benefits. Specific treatments for coma in nonprimary brain injury are still lacking.