Pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Changes in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist (GLP-1 RA) Exposures Following Recent Demand for Weight Management: A Retrospective Review of California Poison Control System Data

Background: Calls to poison centers involving exposure to glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) have increased. Data from a statewide poison control system from 2017 to 2023 was analyzed to assess changes in GLP-1 RA exposure frequencies and reported clinical effects. Methods: Retrospective records review of all human exposure cases to GLP-1 RA reported to a statewide poison center from December 1, 2017 to December 31, 2023. Collected data were entered into REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Changes in exposure frequency over time assessed with interrupted time series analysis (ITSA); the intervention was FDA approval of semaglutide (Wegovy) for chronic weight management in June 2021. Statistical analyses completed using Stata v17 or OpenEpi (v3.01). Results: One thousand forty-seven cases were included. Interrupted time series analysis identified an increase in reported GLP-1 RA exposures of 1.16 per month ([CI = 0.570, 1.802]; P < 0.001) and an increase in hospital utilization from exposures of 0.351 per month ([CI = 0.159, 0.544]; P = 0.001) following Wegovy approval. Common adverse effects were nausea (n = 295, 28.0%), vomiting (n = 267, 25.5%), dizziness (n = 63, 6.0%), abdominal pain (n = 54, 5.1%), and other gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 60, 5.7%). Most cases were managed at home (n = 696, 66.5%). Two hundred twenty (21.0%) patients were treated in the emergency department, and 46 (4.4%) were admitted. The most common reason for exposure was unintentional therapeutic error (n = 838, 80.0%). Five major (0.5%) and 72 moderate (6.9%) medical outcomes were reported. Hypoglycemia occurred in 40 (3.8%) patients. Thirty-six exposures involving compounded GLP-1 RA were identified; administration errors were the main reason for exposures among this subgroup (n = 33, 91.7%). Conclusion: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposures and hospital utilization after exposure increased following Wegovy approval for weight management. Hypoglycemia, while infrequent, was reported; nondiabetic patients using GLP-1 RA should be educated on recognizing hypoglycemia. Additional patient education on GLP-1 RA administration and further study on the impact of compounded GLP-1 RA products are warranted.

Incretins and SGLT-2 inhibitors in diabetic patients with neuroendocrine tumors: current updates and future directions

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are frequently associated with glycemic disorders, such as prediabetes or diabetes, which may result from either surgical or medical treatments or hormonal hypersecretion by the tumor itself. Moreover, pre-existing diabetes is a known risk factor for NET development, with metabolic control and antidiabetic therapies potentially influencing tumor progression. The complex interplay between diabetes and NET, which share several molecular pathways, has spurred interest in the anti-cancer effects of antidiabetic medications. This is particularly relevant as new antidiabetic drugs continue to emerge, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and incretin-based therapies, such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists and dual GIP/GLP- 1 R agonists. This review explores the impact of these novel pharmacological options on NET development and progression through a comprehensive analysis of pre-clinical and clinical studies, with the purpose to evaluate safety and feasibility of introducing these drugs in the treatment of NETs patients. We conducted a comprehensive search of online databases, including PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus, for studies assessing the therapeutic effects and potential mechanisms of action of incretins and SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with NET. These novel antidiabetic drugs exhibit promising anticancer properties, potentially inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis, though concerns about certain cancer risks remain. Based on current evidence, the benefits of incretin-based therapies outweigh any potential cancer risks, leading to the proposal of tailored management algorithms for diabetes in NET patients, factoring in the diabetes aetiology, comorbidities, and life expectancy.

How 'miracle' weight-loss semaglutide promises to change medicine but can we afford the expense?

Obesity is a complex and growing global concern, affecting one in eight individuals and compromising health, quality of life and life expectancy. It carries significant metabolic, cardiovascular, oncological, hepatorenal, skeletal and psychiatric risks, imposing substantial costs on health-care systems. Traditional treatments have often been ineffective or have led to relapse after lifestyle changes. Whereas bariatric surgery is effective, it also involves risks such as mortality and hospitalisation. Semaglutide, licensed in 2018, is a synthetic analogue of glucagon-like peptide 1 which regulates glucose metabolism and gastrointestinal (GI) motility. Studies show that semaglutide, administered either weekly and subcutaneously, or daily orally, induces an average weight loss of -11.62 kg compared to placebo and reduces waist circumference by up to -9.4 cm. It also improves blood pressure, fasting glucose levels, C-reactive protein levels and lipid profiles. The most common adverse events are mild-to-moderate GI complaints occurring more frequently with daily administration than weekly doses; hypoglycaemia is more common without lifestyle intervention. Weight regain often follows semaglutide withdrawal. Furthermore, semaglutide offers cardiovascular benefits for patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), lowers the risk of kidney outcomes and cardiovascular-related death, resolves nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in many cases, and positively impacts mental health and quality of life. In conclusion, semaglutide therapy could significantly benefit many adults regarding CVD and mortality if made widely accessible. Ethical and financial considerations must be addressed for personalised obesity treatment approaches.

Noninsulin Diabetes Medications in Hospitalized Children and Adolescents

The prevalence of pediatric diabetes continues to rise in the United States and worldwide. There are various forms of pediatric diabetes including type 1, type 2, and maturity onset diabetes of youth. The treatment depends on each unique type of diabetes and must be taken into consideration for patients based on presentation and clinical setting. There is limited literature supporting the use of noninsulin medications to manage pediatric diabetes in an inpatient setting. This article focuses on noninsulin medication management of children and adolescents presenting with hyperglycemia in acute care settings, both critically and noncritically ill.

Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Patients with Obesity: A Review

Type 2 diabetes and obesity have some overlapping pathophysiology. This has allowed for the creation of therapies which are highly effective in treating both conditions. Weekly subcutaneous incretin agonists are preferred agents as they provide significant improvement in glycemic parameters, weight, and other comorbidities, like heart failure and reduce major adverse cardiovascular event. Bariatric surgery continues to show the most durable benefits for patients with both type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity and should be considered in patients who are unable to meet goals with pharmacotherapy and lifestyle.

Pancreatitis Risk Associated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, Considered as a Single Class, in a Comorbidity-Free Subgroup of Type 2 Diabetes Patients in the United States: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are commonly prescribed for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the potential connection between GLP-1 RAs and the risk of pancreatitis presents a complex and nuanced issue. Although these drugs are effective in improving blood sugar control and cardiovascular health, their association with pancreatitis remains an area of concern. Our study aims to evaluate the association between the use of GLP-1 RAs, considered as a single class, and the risk of pancreatitis in a comorbidity-free subgroup of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the United States. Methods: Data were retrieved from the TriNetX research database using the US Collaborative Network, which included information from 61 healthcare organizations within the U.S. Patients diagnosed with T2DM were categorized into two cohorts: one consisting of the patients prescribed with GLP-1 RAs and the other comprising patients who did not receive GLP-1 RAs. Of this class of medications, the agents analyzed were dulaglutide, lixisenatide, exenatide, liraglutide, and semaglutide. Using a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) model, we matched patients of both cohorts based on baseline demographics, comorbidities (hypertensive disorders, ischemic heart disease, gallstones, annular pancreas, alcohol use disorders, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercalcemia, cystic fibrosis, and cannabis use), medications known to cause drug-related pancreatitis, and laboratory values. Results: Of 969,240 patients with T2DM, 9.7% (93,608) were on GLP-1 RA, and 90.3% (875,632) were not. After PSM, the sample included 81,872 patients in each cohort. The risk of pancreatitis between the two groups was not statistically different between the two cohorts at 6 months at (0.1% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.04), and remained without significant increase with time; at 1 year (0.1% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.02), 3 years (0.2% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.001), and 5 years (0.3% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001). The lifetime risk of developing pancreatitis in patients on GLP-1 RA was lower (0.3% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: In our comorbidity-free U.S.-based population with T2DM, the use of GLP-1 RAs did not increase their risk of pancreatitis. Their use was associated with a lower lifetime risk of pancreatitis.

Anti-Diabetic Therapies and Cancer: From Bench to Bedside

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant risk factor for various cancers, with the impact of anti-diabetic therapies on cancer progression differing across malignancies. Among these therapies, metformin has gained attention for its potential anti-cancer effects, primarily through modulation of the AMP-activated protein kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (AMPK/mTOR) pathway and the induction of autophagy. Beyond metformin, other conventional anti-diabetic treatments, such as insulin, sulfonylureas (SUs), pioglitazone, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, have also been examined for their roles in cancer biology, though findings are often inconclusive. More recently, novel medications, like glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, dual GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) agonists, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, have revolutionized DM management by not only improving glycemic control but also delivering substantial cardiovascular and renal benefits. Given their diverse metabolic effects, including anti-obesogenic properties, these novel agents are now under meticulous investigation for their potential influence on tumorigenesis and cancer advancement. This review aims to offer a comprehensive exploration of the evolving landscape of glucose-lowering treatments and their implications in cancer biology. It critically evaluates experimental evidence surrounding the molecular mechanisms by which these medications may modulate oncogenic signaling pathways and reshape the tumor microenvironment (TME). Furthermore, it assesses translational research and clinical trials to gauge the practical relevance of these findings in real-world settings. Finally, it explores the potential of anti-diabetic medications as adjuncts in cancer treatment, particularly in enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy, minimizing toxicity, and addressing resistance within the framework of immunotherapy.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Promising Therapy for Modern Lifestyle Diseases with Unforeseen Challenges

Modern lifestyle diseases remain a persistent challenge in healthcare. Currently, about 422 million people worldwide are affected by diabetes, while 1 in 8 people are living with obesity. The development of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has marked a significant milestone in treating these conditions. Interest in GLP-1RAs has grown due to evidence that, beyond their established role in diabetes management, these drugs influence other metabolic disorders. This is attributed to the fact that GLP-1 receptors are found in various healthy human tissues. However, a potential cause for concern is the expression of GLP-1 receptors in certain cancers. This review focuses on the most recent findings concerning the actions of GLP-1RAs, detailing their documented impact on the thyroid gland and pancreas. It addresses concerns about the long-term use of GLP-1RAs in relation to the development of pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and thyroid neoplasms by exploring the mechanisms and long-term effects in different patient subgroups and including data not discussed previously. This review was conducted through an examination of the literature available in the MedLine (PubMed) database, covering publications from 1978 to 10 May 2024. The collected articles were selected based on their relevance to studies of GLP-1 agonists and their effects on the pancreas and thyroid and assessed to meet the established inclusion criteria. The revised papers suggest that prolonged use of GLP-1RA could contribute to the formation of thyroid tumors and may increase the risk of acute inflammatory conditions such as pancreatitis, particularly in high-risk patients. Therefore, physicians should advise patients on the need for more frequent and detailed follow-ups.

Repurposing metabolic regulators: antidiabetic drugs as anticancer agents

Drug repurposing in cancer taps into the capabilities of existing drugs, initially designed for other ailments, as potential cancer treatments. It offers several advantages over traditional drug discovery, including reduced costs, reduced development timelines, and a lower risk of adverse effects. However, not all drug classes align seamlessly with a patient's condition or long-term usage. Hence, repurposing of chronically used drugs presents a more attractive option. On the other hand, metabolic reprogramming being an important hallmark of cancer paves the metabolic regulators as possible cancer therapeutics. This review emphasizes the importance and offers current insights into the repurposing of antidiabetic drugs, including metformin, sulfonylureas, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), thiazolidinediones (TZD), and α-glucosidase inhibitors, against various types of cancers. Antidiabetic drugs, regulating metabolic pathways have gained considerable attention in cancer research. The literature reveals a complex relationship between antidiabetic drugs and cancer risk. Among the antidiabetic drugs, metformin may possess anti-cancer properties, potentially reducing cancer cell proliferation, inducing apoptosis, and enhancing cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapy. However, other antidiabetic drugs have revealed heterogeneous responses. Sulfonylureas and TZDs have not demonstrated consistent anti-cancer activity, while SGLT2 inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors have shown some potential benefits. GLP-1RAs have raised concerns due to possible associations with an increased risk of certain cancers. This review highlights that further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the potential anti-cancer effects of these drugs and to establish their efficacy and safety in clinical settings.

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Disease: What Do Clinicians Need to Know?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are gaining importance due to their effects on cardiovascular parameters. This review discusses the findings of dedicated cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1RAs and summarizes their utility to help clinicians understand their role in cardiovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with diabetes mellitus are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular outcome trials have shown GLP-1RAs decrease the primary composite outcome of the first occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with diabetes. Additionally, select GLP-1RAs have also shown improved cardiovascular outcomes in patients without diabetes who are either overweight (BMI ≥ 27), or obese (BMI ≥ 30). There have also been encouraging results in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. There is increasing evidence showing GLP-1RAs are beneficial across the cardiometabolic spectrum of disease. Implementation of these therapeutics into clinical practice is important to improve cardiovascular risk.

Case report: GLP1RA for the treatment of diabetes in liver transplanted people. Do they increase the risk of pancreatitis?

The incidence of acute pancreatitis (AP) in liver transplanted people is reported to be 1.5-8%. On the other hand, the evidence for a causal relationship between glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) and pancreatitis in people with type 2 diabetes is still weak. In addition, there are currently no data on a possible increased risk of AP in liver-transplanted individuals with diabetes treated with GLP1RAs. In a population of liver-transplanted individuals with diabetes receiving GLP1RA-based therapy, we reported an incidence of AP of 3.0% (two subjects). No cases were reported in liver-transplanted individuals with diabetes receiving SGLT2 inhibitors, insulin or metformin, neither in kidney or lung-transplanted patients treated with GLP1RAs. In both patients with AP, the only additional risk factor for its development was a history of re-transplantation (liver or combined kidney/liver). For this reason, we suggest particular caution when considering GLP1RAs-based therapies in liver transplanted patients with multiple risk factors for AP, such as a history of repeated and complex abdominal surgery.

The Use of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Does Not Increase the Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: A U.S.-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

GLP-1 RAs are widely used for T2DM treatment due to their cardiorenal and metabolic benefits. This study examines the risk of pancreatic cancer with GLP-1 RA use in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

We analyzed TriNetX's deidentified research database using the U.S. Collaborative Network comprising 62 healthcare organizations across the U.S.A. Patients with T2DM were split into two cohorts: one receiving GLP-1 RAs, and one not receiving GLP-1 RAs. We excluded patients with known risk factors for pancreatic cancer, including pancreatic cysts, a personal or family history of BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, KRAS, MEN1, MLH1, MSH2, NOTCH1, PALB2, PMS2, and PRSS1S genes, family history of pancreatic cancer, and VHL syndrome. Using a 1:1 propensity score-matching model based on baseline characteristics and comorbidities, we created comparable cohorts. We then compared the rate of pancreatic cancer between the two cohorts at a 7-year interval.

RESULTS

Out of 7,146,015 identified patients with T2DM, 10.3% were on a GLP-1 RA and 89.7% were not. Post-PSM, 721,110 patients were in each group. Patients on GLP-1 RAs had a 0.1% risk compared to a 0.2% risk of pancreatic cancer in the 7-year timeframe.

CONCLUSION

The use of GLP-1 RAs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) does not appear to substantially elevate the risk of pancreatic cancer; in fact, it may potentially exert a protective effect.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Based Therapies: A New Horizon in Obesity Management

Obesity is a significant risk factor for health issues like type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. It often proves resistant to traditional lifestyle interventions, prompting a need for more precise therapeutic strategies. This has led to a focus on signaling pathways and neuroendocrine mechanisms to develop targeted obesity treatments. Recent developments in obesity management have been revolutionized by introducing novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) based drugs, such as semaglutide and tirzepatide. These drugs are part of an emerging class of nutrient-stimulated hormone-based therapeutics, acting as incretin mimetics to target G-protein-coupled receptors like GLP-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and glucagon. These receptors are vital in regulating body fat and energy balance. The development of multiagonists, including GLP-1-glucagon and GIP-GLP-1-glucagon receptor agonists, especially with the potential for glucagon receptor activation, marks a significant advancement in the field. This review covers the development and clinical efficacy of various GLP-1-based therapeutics, exploring the challenges and future directions in obesity management.

Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency During the Use of Semaglutide: A Case Report

Although acute pancreatitis has been reported as an adverse event in patients treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, to date we have not identified a case describing exocrine pancreatic insufficiency related to this drug. Here we present a case of a patient with no history of acute pancreatitis, who was diagnosed with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency during the third year of weekly subcutaneous semaglutide for obesity control. A 68-year-old man with previous unsuccessful therapeutic approaches for weight loss used subcutaneous semaglutide, once a week, for 181 weeks. The pharmacological treatment, combined with instructions on lifestyle changes, resulted in a weight loss of 11.6% of initial body weight, with a reduction in body mass index from 35.7 to 31.9 kg/m2. The patient received a regular dose of 0.5mg/week in the first 14 weeks in a private physician's office. During this period, an asymptomatic elevation of serum lipase was identified and attributed to alcohol consumption. Because the patient complained of less satiety and weight loss stabilization, the dose of semaglutide was increased to 1.0mg/week. Serum lipase levels increased to up to eight times the upper normal limit and the use of semaglutide was discontinued for 10 weeks. Due to progressive weight regain and serum lipase levels being near normal, semaglutide was reintroduced at 0.25mg/week with progressive increments until 1.0mg/week. The patient missed the follow-up appointments, continued the same dose of semaglutide for another 16 weeks, and discontinued treatment after another asymptomatic elevation in serum lipase levels. Four weeks later, the patient reported steatorrhea and was seen by a gastroenterologist, who diagnosed exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. The course of our case suggests a potential association between semaglutide and chronic alcohol consumption in the development of exogenous pancreatic insufficiency. We call attention to the importance of regular monitoring of serum lipase levels in patients taking GLP-1 analogues and suggest that the consumption of any amount of alcohol should be discouraged in patients in long-term treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

Semaglutide and cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

French national health care insurance system database has suggested 1-3 years use of glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) (exenatide, liraglutide and dulaglutide) may be linked with increased occurrence of thyroid cancer. Similar data on semaglutide is not-available. Hence, we undertook this systematic review to look at the safety of semaglutide focussing on different cancers.

METHODS

Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies involving patients receiving semaglutide in the intervention-arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate the occurrence of pancreatic and thyroid cancers. Secondary outcomes were to the evaluate occurrence of any other malignancies or severe adverse-events.

RESULTS

Data from 37 RCTs and 19 real-world studies having 16,839 patients in placebo-control group, 16,550 patients in active-control group and 13,330 patients in real-world studies were analysed. Compared to placebo, occurrence of pancreatic cancer [OR 0.25 (95%CI: 0.03-2.24); P = 0.21], thyroid cancer [OR 2.04 (95%CI: 0.33-12.61); P = 0.44; I2 = 0%] and all neoplasms (benign, malignant and otherwise unspecified) [OR 0.95 (95%CI:0.62-1.45); P = 0.82; I2 = 0%] was similar in the semaglutide group. Compared to active controls, occurrence of pancreatic cancer [OR 0.40 (95%CI:0.09-1.87); P = 0.26; I2 = 0%], thyroid cancer [OR 1.19 (95%CI:0.15-9.66); P = 0.87; I2 = 0%] and all neoplasms (benign, malignant and otherwise unspecified) [OR 0.91 (95% CI: 0.44-1.89); P = 0.79; I2 = 0%] were similar in the semaglutide group. Real-world data analysis revealed single case each of pancreatic cancer and B-cell lymphoma.

CONCLUSION

Semaglutide use in RCTs and real-world studies was not associated with an increased risk of any types of cancer, and this conclusion is supported by a high grade of evidence.