‘PERFSCORE’ – a multidimensional score

Guidelines for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery. Consensus document of Spanish Societies of Anesthesia (SEDAR), Cardiovascular Surgery (SECCE) and Perfusionists (AEP)

The ERAS guidelines are intended to identify, disseminate and promote the implementation of the best, scientific evidence-based actions to decrease variability in clinical practice. The implementation of these practices in the global clinical process will promote better outcomes and the shortening of hospital and critical care unit stays, thereby resulting in a reduction in costs and in greater efficiency. After completing a systematic review at each of the points of the perioperative process in cardiac surgery, recommendations have been developed based on the best scientific evidence currently available with the consensus of the scientific societies involved.

Impact of ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation on cardiovascular outcomes: a long-term follow-up study

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term clinical impact of the application of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) early after discharge in a real-world population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the 5-year incidence of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes in two populations, attenders vs. non-attenders to an ambulatory CR program which were consecutively discharged from two tertiary hospitals, after ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, or planned percutaneous coronary intervention. A primary analysis using multivariable regression model and a secondary analysis using the propensity score approach were performed. Between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010, 839 patients attended a CR program planned at discharged, while 441 patients were discharged from Cardiovascular Department without any program of CR. During follow-up, the incidence of cardiovascular mortality was 6% in both groups (P = 0.62). The composite outcome of hospitalizations for cardiovascular causes and cardiovascular mortality were lower in CR group compared to no-CR group (18% vs. 30%, P < 0.001) and was driven by lower hospitalizations for cardiovascular causes (15 vs. 27%, P < 0.001). At multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, CR program was independent predictor of lower occurrence of the composite outcome (hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.77; P < 0.001), while in the propensity-matched analysis CR group experienced also a lower total mortality (10% vs. 19%, P = 0.002) and cardiovascular mortality (2% vs. 7%, P = 0.008) compared to no-CR group.

CONCLUSION

This study showed, in a real-world population, the positive effects of ambulatory CR program in improving clinical outcomes and highlights the importance of a spread use of CR in order to reduce cardiovascular hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality during a long-term follow-up.

Prognostic Role of Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease After an Ambulatory Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

The relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and outcomes after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is not well established; therefore we assessed the prognostic role of LVEF at the end of ambulatory CR program in patients (pts) who received coronary revascularization. LVEF was evaluated at hospital discharge and re-assessed at the end of CR in all ST-elevation myocardial infarction and coronary artery bypass graft pts, while in pts with non-ST-elevation MI or elective percutaneous coronary intervention the echocardiography was repeated if they had an impaired LVEF at discharge. New hospitalizations for cardiovascular causes at 1-year, and cardiovascular mortality during long-term follow-up were analyzed. We enrolled in CR 3078 pts, 86% showed LVEF ≥40% and 9% LVEF <40%. Of those with a discharge LVEF <40%, 56% improved LVEF (LVEF ≥40%) after CR. At 1-year, heart failure was the main cause of new hospitalizations in LVEF <40% group compared with LVEF ≥40% group (5% vs 0.4%, p <0.01). During a mean follow up of 48 ± 25 months, cardiovascular death occurred in 9% of pts with LVEF <40% and in 2% with LVEF ≥40% (p = 0.014). At Cox multivariate analysis, LVEF <40% at the end of CR and age were independent predictors of hospitalization and mortality for cardiovascular causes, while coronary artery bypass graft was a protective factor. In conclusion, during CR the improvement of LVEF occurs in a relevant proportion of patients, the re-assessment of LVEF at the end of the CR is helpful for risk stratification because left ventricle dysfunction at the end of CR is associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes.

Early occurrence of drug intolerance as risk factor during follow-up in patients with acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularization

Aims

The occurrence of drug intolerance (DI) after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an important reason for quitting treatment. Nevertheless, the association between DI and major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) is poorly reported in the literature, therefore, we analysed potential relationship between DI and MACCE (a composite of ACS, PCI, heart failure, and stroke) during follow-up.

Methods and results

From 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2015, 891 consecutive patients after ACS or coronary revascularization were referred to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme and included in a dedicated registry where DI was analysed and treatment appropriately tailored. Three hundred and nine patients (34.7%) developed DI, 26.9% of them were female. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and statins were the most frequent drugs which caused DI, followed by beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers, in 13.1%, 12.8%, 7.5%, and 5.5% of patients, respectively. During a median follow-up of 18 (interquartile range 11-24) months after CR, MACCE occurred in 14.1% of patients with DI and 8.1% without DI (P = 0.007). At multivariable model, DI to 1 drug [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-3.18; P = 0.043] or to 2 drugs (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.27-5.17; P = 0.008) were independently associated to MACCE. Regarding the association of specific class of prognostic drugs to MACCE, only DI to ACE-inhibitors was independently associated with MACCE (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.14-4.65; P = 0.019).

Conclusion

DI was frequently encountered in real-world clinical practice and was significantly associated with MACCE during follow-up. This study suggests that early occurrence of DI could be considered to be an adjunctive cardiovascular risk factor during secondary prevention.