Death rates and causes in anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients

Comparing Outcomes in Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 81,462 Patients

BACKGROUND

In atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, the presence of symptoms can guide the decision between rate or rhythm control therapy, but it is still unclear if AF-related outcomes are determined by symptomatic status of their clinical presentation.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and metanalysis following the PRISMA recommendations on available studies that compared asymptomatic to symptomatic AF reporting data on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and thromboembolic events (TEs). We included studies with a total number of patients enrolled equal to or greater than 200, with a minimum follow-up period of six months.

RESULTS

From the initial 5476 results retrieved after duplicates' removal, a total of 10 studies were selected. Overall, 81,462 patients were included, of which 21,007 (26%) were asymptomatic, while 60,455 (74%) were symptomatic. No differences were found between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients regarding the risks of all-cause death (odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.32), and cardiovascular death (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.54-1.39). No differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were evident for stroke (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.77-1.93) and stroke/TE (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.86-1.31) risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality and stroke/TE events in AF patients were unrelated to symptomatic status of their clinical presentation. Adoption of management strategies in AF patients should not be based on symptomatic clinical status.

Prior use of therapeutic anticoagulation does not protect against COVID-19 related clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients: A propensity score-matched cohort study

The hypercoagulable state observed in COVID‐19 could be responsible for morbidity and mortality. In this retrospective study we investigated whether therapeutic anticoagulation prior to infection has a beneficial effect in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients. This study included 1154 COVID‐19 patients admitted to 6 hospitals in the Netherlands between March and May 2020. We applied 1:3 propensity score matching to evaluate the association between prior therapeutic anticoagulation use and clinical outcome, with in hospital mortality as primary endpoint. In total, 190 (16%) patients used therapeutic anticoagulation prior to admission. In the propensity score matched analyses, we observed no associations between prior use of therapeutic anticoagulation and overall mortality (risk ratio 1.02 [95% confidence interval; 0.80–1.30]) or length of hospital stay (7.0 [4–12] vs. 7.0 [4–12] days, P = .69), although we observed a lower risk of pulmonary embolism (0.19 [0.05–0.80]). This study shows that prior use of therapeutic anticoagulation is not associated with improved clinical outcome in hospitalized COVID‐19 patients.

Reduction in all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients on chronic oral anticoagulation: A population-based propensity score matched study

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has strikingly high mortality rate with hypercoagulability state being part of the imputed mechanisms. We aimed to compare the rates of in hospital mortality in propensity score matched cohorts of COVID-19 patients in chronic anticoagulation versus those that were not.

Methods

In this population-based study in the Veneto Region, we retrospectively reviewed all patients aged 65 years or older, with a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. We compared, after propensity score matching, those who received chronic anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation with those who did not.

Results

Overall, 4697 COVID-19 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria, and the propensity score matching yielded 559 patients per arm. All-cause mortality rate ratio was significantly higher among non-anticoagulated patients (32.2% vs 26.5%, p = 0.036). On time to event analysis, all-cause mortality was found lower among anticoagulated patients, although the estimate was not statistically significant. (HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.65–1.01, p = 0.054).

Conclusion

Among elderly patients with COVID-19, those on chronic oral anticoagulant treatment for atrial fibrillation seem to be at lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to their propensity score matched non-anticoagulated counterpart. This finding needs to be confirmed in further studies.

Obesity Paradox and 12 Month Outcome in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Obesity increases the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) while it may impact the outcome of patients with AF. The clinical implications of this relationship are not completely clear. We aimed to analyze the association of traditional anthropometric measures of excessive adiposity with 12 month case fatality rate (CFR) in patients with AF.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, longitudinal, observational study on adults with documented AF, excluding records of AF secondary to reversible causes. Anthropometric variables were registered at baseline, and a central committee validated the 12 month outcomes.

RESULTS

We studied 1193 patients (median age: 69.14 years, 55.2% women). At baseline, rhythm control was established for 476 (39.9%) subjects, while frequency control was offered to 717 (60.1%) participants. The 12 month all-cause CFR was 8.9%. A high basal body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and waist circumference (WC) were associated with lower CFR in bivariate analyses. In a Cox-proportional hazards model, variables associated with 12 month all-cause CFR were BMI categories (HR: 0.736, 95% CI: 0.584-0.928), chronic heart failure (HR: 1.738, 95% CI: 1.127-2.680), chronic kidney disease (HR: 2.269, 95% CI: 1.162-4.429) and carotid stenosis >50% (HR: 5.342, 95% CI: 1.661-17.181).

CONCLUSION

The risk of death at one year in patients with AF is inversely associated with a high BMI and directly associated with the presence of chronic kidney disease, carotid stenosis, and chronic heart failure in this cohort of patients with AF. The causes and implications of this apparent obesity paradox should be addressed in the future.