5
|
Bianchi A, Collivignarelli F, Vignoli M, Scaletta L, Cuomo A, Falerno I, Paolini A, Tamburro R. A Comparison of Times Taken for the Placement of the First Portal and Complication Rates between the Veress Needle Technique and the Modified Hasson Technique in Canine Ovariectomy Laparoscopic Surgery. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:2936. [PMID: 34679957 PMCID: PMC8532732 DOI: 10.3390/ani11102936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly being used in veterinary medicine. Laparoscopic procedures have several advantages compared with open surgery. These include the magnification of the field of surgery, reduced post-surgical pain and associated stress, reduced post-operative infection rates, and decreased hospitalization time. The establishment of a pneumoperitoneum is a critical step; however, this procedure can prolong the operation time, and most of the complications associated with laparoscopic surgery have been attributed to the insertion of devices into the abdominal cavity. Two main techniques have been employed to create pneumoperitoneum: the closed-entry method using the Veress needle and the open Hasson technique. The first portal is necessary to start insufflation and, subsequently, to realize the operative channel to insert the laparoscopic instruments into the abdomen. Many authors have compared the time necessary to create the first portal using different techniques in human medicine, but studies on this topic in veterinary medicine are lacking. In the veterinary medicine literature, complications associated with the creation of a pneumoperitoneum and the placement of ports include spleen, bowel, or bladder injuries; pneumothorax; and subcutaneous emphysema. The aim of the present study was to compare the times required for the placement of the first portal and the creation of pneumoperitoneum, and the rates of intraoperative complications using the Veress needle technique (VNT) and the open modified Hasson technique (MHT). The sample population comprised 30 female dogs who underwent laparoscopic ovariectomies. The dogs were randomly organized into two groups and two different entry techniques were used: Veress needle (VNT = group A) and the modified Hasson technique (MHT = group B). Complications related to abdominal entry were classified as major, in cases of organ perforation, and minor, in cases of subcutaneous emphysema and gas leakage. The VNT and MHT required 374.0 s and 242.9 s, respectively, for the placement of the first portal and for establishing pneumoperitoneum (p < 0.05). Their major complications rates were 20% and 0%, respectively (p < 0.05). Their minor complications rates were 20% and 35%, respectively (p < 0.05). No surgical procedures required laparotomy. The MHT was associated with a lower major complication rate and required less time to create the first portal, compared with the Veress needle technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Bianchi
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (A.C.); (I.F.); (A.P.); (R.T.)
| | - Francesco Collivignarelli
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (A.C.); (I.F.); (A.P.); (R.T.)
| | - Massimo Vignoli
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (A.C.); (I.F.); (A.P.); (R.T.)
| | - Lorenzo Scaletta
- Veterinaria Enterprise Stp S.R.L., Via Galvani 33d, 00153 Rome, Italy;
| | - Amedeo Cuomo
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (A.C.); (I.F.); (A.P.); (R.T.)
| | - Ilaria Falerno
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (A.C.); (I.F.); (A.P.); (R.T.)
| | - Andrea Paolini
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (A.C.); (I.F.); (A.P.); (R.T.)
| | - Roberto Tamburro
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy; (F.C.); (A.C.); (I.F.); (A.P.); (R.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Percival A, Singh A, Gartley C, Balsa I, Case JB, Mayhew PD, Oblak M, Brisson BA, Runge JJ, Valverde A, Alex Zur Linden R, Gatineau M. Single-Port Laparoscopic Treatment and Outcome of Dogs with Ovarian Remnant Syndrome: 13 Cases (2010-2018). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2020; 56:114-119. [PMID: 31961214 DOI: 10.5326/jaaha-ms-6923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian remnant syndrome (ORS) is a condition resulting from incomplete removal of ovarian tissue during ovariectomy and/or ovariohysterectomy. Single-port laparoscopy (SPL) is an alternative to ventral midline laparotomy for treatment of ORS. Medical records of 13 client-owned female dogs who underwent SPL for the treatment of ORS were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate surgical technique and outcome. Dogs who had undergone a previous attempt at open ovariectomy or ovariohysterectomy were included. Major intraoperative complications did not occur and conversion to open laparotomy was not required. In 1 dog, an SPL + 1 technique was used, in which an additional port was placed cranial to the single-port device to aid in dissection and tissue manipulation. Median surgical time was 45 min (range, 30-90 min). Clinical signs related to estrus had resolved in 11 of 13 dogs with a median follow-up time of 18 mo. Two of 13 dogs were lost to follow-up at 3 mo postoperatively; however, signs of estrus had resolved at time of last follow-up. SPL treatment for ORS was feasible and successful in this cohort of dogs. Reduced surgical time was found in this study compared with previous reports investigating multiple-port laparoscopic treatment of ORS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Percival
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - Ameet Singh
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - Cathy Gartley
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - Ingrid Balsa
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - J Brad Case
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - Philipp D Mayhew
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - Michelle Oblak
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - Brigitte A Brisson
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - Jeffrey J Runge
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - Alexander Valverde
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - R Alex Zur Linden
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| | - Matthieu Gatineau
- From the Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada (A.P., A.S., C.G., M.O., B.A.B., A.V., R.A.zL.); Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, Davis, California (I.B., P.D.M.); Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (J.B.C.); Centre Veterinaire DMV, Montreal, Canada (M.G.); and Department of Clinical Studies, Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (J.J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Nimwegen SA, Van Goethem B, de Gier J, Kirpensteijn J. A laparoscopic approach for removal of ovarian remnant tissue in 32 dogs. BMC Vet Res 2018; 14:333. [PMID: 30404648 PMCID: PMC6223097 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1658-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical treatment of ovarian remnant syndrome (ORS) in dogs usually necessitates large celiotomies and considerable manipulation of organs because of the relatively deep position of ovarian remnant tissue, large patient size, and often encountered adhesions. In women, laparoscopic treatment of ORS is successful and has significant advantages over laparotomy. Since laparoscopic ovariectomy has significant advantages over open ovariectomy in dogs, including reduced surgical stress and postoperative pain and shorter convalescence period, the rationale for a laparoscopic approach of canine ORS is evident. Feasibility and efficacy of a laparoscopic approach for treatment of ORS in dogs was prospectively evaluated using a standardized protocol for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Treatment success was evaluated by histology of removed tissues, postoperative hormone testing, and long-term clinical follow-up. RESULTS Thirty-two client-owned predominantly medium and large breed dogs diagnosed with ORS underwent abdominal ultrasound for ovarian remnant localization prior to laparoscopic surgery for removal of ovarian remnants. Tissue dissection and excision was performed using a vessel sealing forceps. Laparoscopy subjectively enabled detailed visibility and facilitated detection and removal of suspected ovarian tissue in all cases. Histology confirmed ovarian origin of removed tissue in all dogs. Additionally, a GnRH stimulation test was performed in fourteen dogs after a median follow-up of 10.5 months, which verified absence of residual functional ovarian remnant tissue in all dogs. Median surgery duration was 97.5 min and mean total convalescence duration, subjectively scored by owners, was 1.5 ± 0.7 days. No major complications occurred. Adhesions were observed in 79% of the dogs, complicated the surgical approach, and significantly affected surgery duration (85 versus 109 min; p = 0.03). Minor hemorrhage occurred in 12% and significantly increased surgery duration (95.5 versus 128 min; p = 0.02). Trendelenburg position and lateral tilting of the patient were essential for proper access to ovarian remnants. GnRH stimulation test results and/or absence of clinical signs indicative of ORS after a median follow-up period of 22.5 months confirmed treatment efficacy in all dogs. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery for ORS in dogs is effective with minimal complications and short convalescence and can successfully replace the conventional, more invasive open surgical procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastiaan A van Nimwegen
- Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 108, 3584CM, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Bart Van Goethem
- Department of Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Jeffrey de Gier
- Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 108, 3584CM, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jolle Kirpensteijn
- Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 108, 3584CM, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Hill's Pet Nutrition, 400 SW 8th Ave, Topeka, KS, 66603, USA
| |
Collapse
|