Direct access compared with referred physical therapy episodes of care: a systematic review

Implementation of the American- College of Physicians Guideline for Low Back Pain (IMPACt-LBP): protocol for a healthcare systems embedded multisite pragmatic cluster-randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

Low back pain (LBP) is a key source of medical costs and disability, impacting over 31 million Americans at any given time and resulting in US$100-US$200 billion per year in total healthcare costs. LBP is one of the leading causes of ambulatory care visits to US physicians; problematically, these visits often result in treatments such as opioids, surgery or advanced imaging that can lead to more harm than benefit. The American College of Physicians (ACP) Guideline for Low Back Pain recommends patients receive non-pharmacological interventions as a first-line treatment. Roadmaps exist for multidisciplinary collaborative care that include well-trained primary contact clinicians with specific expertise in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions, such as physical therapists and doctors of chiropractic, as first-line providers for LBP. These clinicians, sometimes referred to as primary spine practitioners (PSPs) routinely employ many of the non-pharmacological approaches recommended by the ACP guideline, including spinal manipulation and exercise. Important foundational work has demonstrated that such care is feasible and safe, and results in improved physical function, less pain, fewer opioid prescriptions and reduced utilisation of healthcare services. However, this treatment approach for LBP has yet to be widely implemented or tested in a multisite clinical trial in real-world practice.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Implementation of the American College of Physicians Guideline for Low Back Pain trial is a health system-embedded pragmatic cluster-randomised trial that will examine the effect of offering initial contact with a PSP compared with usual primary care for LBP. Twenty-six primary care clinics within three healthcare systems were randomised 1:1 to PSP intervention or usual primary care. Primary outcomes are pain interference and physical function using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms collected via patient self-report among a planned sample of 1800 participants at baseline, 1, 3 (primary end point), 6 and 12 months. A subset of participants enrolled early in the trial will also receive a 24-month assessment. An economic analysis and analysis of healthcare utilisation will be conducted as well as an evaluation of the patient, provider and policy-level barriers and facilitators to implementing the PSP model using a mixed-methods process evaluation approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study received ethics approval from Advarra, Duke University, Dartmouth Health and the University of Iowa Institutional Review Boards. Study data will be made available on completion, in compliance with National Institutes of Health data sharing policies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05626049.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Nutrition Among Physical Therapy Students

Similar to other medical professions, the field of physical therapy is transitioning from a reactive to proactive model of care. This holistic approach to practice largely includes physical activity but also includes the often-overlooked field of nutrition. The purpose of this research study was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of nutrition in physical therapy students. Subjects included current students and recent graduates of doctoral physical therapy programs (N = 151). A cross-sectional mixed methods survey was disseminated to Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students. The survey consisted of 49 questions including demographic information, a nutrition knowledge test (NKT), and questions about attitudes and beliefs regarding nutrition. The mean NKT score of this sample was15.09 ± 3.33 out of 28 total points. Only 19.2% of total respondents agreed or strongly agreed with feeling comfortable counseling clients and only 2.6% agreed or strongly agreed that their nutrition courses adequately provided them with the proper tools to educate clients on nutrition. However, 60.2% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that an introductory nutrition course should be a requirement of any DPT education. Findings demonstrate a gap in knowledge of nutrition among physical therapy students.

Foot and Ankle Curricular Guidelines in Entry-Level Physical Therapist Education: How Are We Doing?

INTRODUCTION

The Foot and Ankle Curricular Guidelines for Physical Therapist Professional Degree Programs (FACG) provided recommendations regarding essential entry-level content and skills. Eight years later, the extent of its implementation is unknown. This study characterizes entry-level Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programs' foot and ankle curriculum with reference to the FACG.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE

Curricular guidelines offer recommendations to professional degree programs striving for excellence. Review and revisions of guidelines are important to keep pace with and reflect evolving evidence and practice.

SUBJECTS

One faculty member from 116 of 250 DPT programs participated (46.6% response rate). Participants were an average of 50.8 years old and taught a mean of 14.5 years.

METHODS

A cross-sectional 25-item online survey assessed foot and ankle contact hours, coverage of FACG recommended content, coverage of surgical procedures, and the use of FACG for curricular assessment, modification, and development.

RESULTS

Foot and ankle content was covered in physical therapy curriculum for a mean of 48.2 hours (range 12-120 hours). Eleven of the 25 recommended diagnoses, 29 of the 49 examination skills, 6 of the 7 intervention skills, and 3 of the 14 surgical procedures were covered by most (≥90%) of the programs. Reported use of FACG for curricular processes averaged 50.1-51.5 (0-100 numerical scale).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Across a wide range of contact hours, coverage of FACG recommended content was approximately 57% (46/81 recommended elements in ≥90% of programs). Although not specifically recommended by FACG, surgical procedures were less commonly covered by programs. Study findings question FACG implementation and may reflect differences across programs in depth and breadth of content. Identified curricular gaps may warrant addressing in future guidelines.

Physiotherapists' perspectives on the implementation of direct access to physiotherapy services in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates Saudi Arabian physiotherapists' perspectives on direct access to physiotherapy (DAPT) services, focusing on perceived benefits, barriers and implementation in clinical practice.

METHODS

A cross-sectional observational study design was used. Data collection occurred between December 2022 and June 2023 via an online structured questionnaire distributed through email and text messages. The DAPT section comprised items on awareness, endorsement, obstacles/barriers to implementation in Saudi Arabia, perceived benefits and expected benefits of various resources to guide evidence-based practice for physiotherapists. This section featured closed-ended questions using a 5-point Likert scale. The study included licensed physiotherapists currently working in Saudi Arabia.

RESULTS

The study included 401 participants, with a nearly equal distribution of 203 males (50.6%) and 198 females (49.4%). The most common age group was 25-34 years, comprising 70.6% of the participants. A significant proportion (61.6%) were aware of DAPT, and 88% acknowledged its potential to reduce delays in care. However, 49.9% had not engaged with relevant literature. The primary barriers to DAPT identified were laws and regulations (mean=3.69, SD=1.21), physician support (mean=3.59, SD=0.99), entry-level education (mean=3.45, SD=1.17), patient beliefs (mean=3.38, SD=1.24), self-confidence (mean=3.35, SD=1.15) and professional autonomy (mean=3.34, SD=1.22).

CONCLUSION

Physiotherapists in Saudi Arabia demonstrate substantial awareness of direct access. Organisational initiatives and increased awareness are essential to promote direct access. This study highlights that direct patient access to physiotherapists offers significant benefits to patients, healthcare workers and the broader community.

Roles of physiotherapists in primary care teams: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to provide an overview of the existing knowledge regarding the roles of physiotherapists in primary care teams.

DESIGN

Scoping review based on the methodological framework provided by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and updated by Levac et al (2010).  DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: A search strategy was carried out across the Medline, CINAHL, Academic Search Complete and AMED databases in June 2023. Selected articles, based on qualitative or mixed design studies, had to report on the roles of physiotherapists working in team-based primary care organisations and be published in the last 10 years.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by one team member and further validated by a second team member. A mixed thematic analysis based on the Competency Profile for Physiotherapists in Canada was used to identify all the roles undertaken by physiotherapists.  RESULTS: The database search yielded 2324 articles. From the 13 included articles, 6 main themes emerged: conduct client assessment for musculoskeletal conditions, participate in health promotion and prevention, promote self-management support, communicate with patients, collaborate with other primary care providers and partners, and provide holistic care.

CONCLUSIONS

The review identified a wide variety of roles, primarily related to the treatment of musculoskeletal patients. In primary care settings, interprofessional collaboration can be hindered by a lack of knowledge regarding the roles of physiotherapists. Future studies should aim to develop effective strategies to ensure that all primary care team members have a comprehensive understanding of the roles of physiotherapists and to explore roles associated with non-traditional forms of physiotherapy practice.

Enhancing Clinical Confidence: Effects of Medical Screening and Differential Diagnosis Training for Low Back Pain

Purpose

Direct access to physical therapy (PT) requires PTs to act as primary care providers, making differential diagnosis a critical component of patient assessment. We investigated how participation in postgraduate training in differential diagnosis and medical screening influences PTs' confidence, self-efficacy, attitudes and beliefs about treating patients with low back pain (LBP).

Patients and Methods

This prospective, two-arm study involved 49 PTs in an intervention group and 70 in a control group. The intervention included 40-hours of training on medical screening and differential diagnosis, focusing on red flags, clinical reasoning and referral pathways, while the control group received no intervention. Clinical confidence, self-efficacy, attitudes and beliefs were measured before, immediately after, and 6-months after training. Outcomes included the Primary Care Confidence Scale (PCCS), which assesses confidence in primary care practice, detection of serious pathology, and medical screening; the Physiotherapy Self-Efficacy (PSE) questionnaire, evaluating clinical self-efficacy in assessing and treating patients with LBP; and the Attitudes to Back Pain Scale for Musculoskeletal Practitioners (ABS-mp), which measures clinicians' attitudes and beliefs about LBP.

Results

The intervention group showed significant immediate improvements in PCCS scores (40.26 ± 5.23 to 45.24 ± 4.20, Cohen's d = 1.08, p < 0.001) and PSE scores (51.06 ± 6.46 to 54.65 ± 5.78, Cohen's d = 0.6, p < 0.001). At six-month, significant interaction effects were observed for PCCS (F = 17.49, Partial η² = 0.131, p < 0.001) and PSE scores (F = 5.87, Partial η² = 0.06, p < 0.05) and PSE scores (55.32 ± 6.09, p < 0.05), with the intervention group maintaining improvements while the control group showed no significant changes. No significant changes were observed in ABS-mp scores.

Conclusion

This study highlights the positive impact of training in medical screening and differential diagnosis on reducing concerns and increasing clinical confidence and self-efficacy.

Low back pain as main symptom in Low-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm (LAMN): A case report

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide. It is also the main cause of the limitation of activities and absence from work in much of the world and a cause of great economic burden. The greatest percentage of low back pain is classified as nonspecific (i.e. not attributable to a defined pathology), while the others may concern specific pathologies of the lumbar region or suggest pathologies of non-musculoskeletal origin. Consequently, evaluating any signs and symptoms mimicking musculoskeletal conditions is crucial.

CASE DESCRIPTION

This case report describes a 64-year-old female patient who first presented to the physiotherapist with two weeks of low back pain, complaining of a different clinical presentation than the previous episodes. The patient's pain started spontaneously and was located in the lumbar region over a diffuse area. Symptoms were constant throughout the day and did not change with movement. Based on the examination findings, the physiotherapist decided to make an urgent referral to the patient's General Practitioner.

OUTCOMES

Following ultrasound examination and Computed Tomography scan, an 8.5 cm mass was confirmed in the abdominal region. It was surgically removed, and a histological diagnosis of Low-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm (LAMN) was made.

CONCLUSION

The physiotherapist's evaluation and decision-making process was fundamental in the patient's referral due to suspected pathology not within the scope of practice. This revealed a rare condition, which, according to the existing literature, is usually diagnosed in the event of collateral imaging findings or upon presentation of complex and/or emergency clinical pictures.

Physical Therapists in Primary Care in the United States: An Overview of Current Practice Models and Implementation Strategies

In the USA, physician shortages and increases in noncommunicable disease burden have resulted in a growing demand for primary care providers (PCPs). Patients with physical and functional impairments have been especially affected by these challenges. However, physical therapists are well suited to meet patient needs in primary care settings by working alongside PCPs and other primary health care team members. When included in a primary care team, physical therapists can improve patient access to care, optimize care navigation, and reduce the overall cost of care. Therefore, the purpose of the current perspective was to (1) provide an overview of established integrated primary care models in the USA that include physical therapists in the care team and (2) outline operational and practice considerations for health care administrators and professionals interested in integrating physical therapists into primary care teams.

IMPACT STATEMENT

Given physician shortages and increasing burden in primary care in the USA, inclusion of a physical therapist in a primary care team can improve patient access to care, optimize care navigation, and reduce the overall cost of care for patients with physical and functional needs.

Physiotherapy-led care versus physician-led care for persons with low back pain: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To summarise the evidence on the effect of physiotherapy-led versus physician-led care on clinical outcomes, healthcare use, and costs in persons with low back pain.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and PEDro were systematically searched with the latest search performed in July 2024. Reference lists of articles were hand-searched.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies comparing clinical outcomes, healthcare use, or costs between adults with low back pain first consulting a physiotherapist and those first consulting a physician were included. Methodological quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Study design, clinical setting, patient characteristics, and group effects were extracted. Findings on outcomes assessed in two or more studies were synthesised narratively. Certainty of evidence was determined using the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies comprising 1,481,980 persons with low back pain were included. Most studies were non-randomised retrospective or prospective cohort studies. In primary care (15 studies), consistent evidence, though of mostly very low certainty, indicated that physiotherapy-led care leads to higher patient satisfaction, less use of medication, injections and imaging, fewer physician's visits, lower total healthcare costs, and less sick leave compared to physician-led care, without increased harm. In emergency care (three studies), evidence of very low certainty showed that physiotherapy-led care leads to shorter waiting and treatment times, and fewer hospital admissions.

CONCLUSION

Physiotherapy-led care is a clinically, time- and cost-effective care pathway for low back pain, although the certainty of evidence was overall very low. Further high-quality research with a greater focus on clinical outcomes is warranted.

Musculoskeletal Head and Neck Injuries in U.S. Active Duty Service Members: Prevalence/Incidence, Health Care Utilization, and Cost Analysis Spanning Fiscal Years 2016-2021

BACKGROUND

Active duty service members (ADSMs) of the U.S. Armed Forces are uniquely at risk for musculoskeletal injuries (MSKIs) of the Head/Neck region, including the eye and face, from training with head gear, donning Kevlar, operating aircraft, and maintaining sitting or standing postures for prolonged durations. The purposes of this descriptive study were to report the prevalence/incidence, health care utilization, and health care costs attributable to Head/Neck MSKIs across the Services from fiscal years (FYs) 2016 to 2021.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, longitudinal population study, including ADSMs from the Air Force, Army, Marine Corps, and Navy. Prevalence and incidence rates for Head/Neck MSKIs, associated health care utilization, and private sector costs were obtained by querying electronic health records from military treatment facilities, private sector care (PC) claims, and theater medical data from October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2021 (FYs 16-21), using the Military Health System Data Repository. Utilization associated with Head/Neck MSKIs in both the direct care and PC settings was classified into mutually exclusive outpatient encounter categories and acute inpatient stays. PC costs related to Head/Neck MSKIs were captured for each year.

RESULTS

In FY21, 109,683 ADSMs sought care for Head/Neck MSKIs, representing 7.3% of the U.S. Armed Forces. The prevalence of Head/Neck MSKIs ranged from 6.9 to 7.8% during FY16-21, with the highest annual prevalence among the Air Force (8.0-9.4%) and Army (7.9-8.8%). Within direct care across the services, Soldiers presented for the highest proportion (45.9-47.9%) of outpatient encounters for Head/Neck MSKI annually. The Air Force relied most heavily on PC for outpatient Head/Neck MSKI care, which accounted for $9,134,741 in PC costs and comprised 37.2% of all PC encounters in FY21.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective, descriptive study established prevalence/incidence, health care utilization, and PC costs for Head/Neck MSKIs across the services from FY16-21, emphasizing the burden of Head/Neck MSKIs among the U.S. Armed Forces, with PC costs amounting to $42,912,940 in FY21 alone.

Process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial - prevention of sickness absence through early identification and rehabilitation of at-risk patients with musculoskeletal disorders (PREVSAM)

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal disorders are commonly treated in primary healthcare and may, if not treated adequately, entail a risk for long-term disability and sickness absence. A team-based rehabilitation intervention (PREVention of Sickness Absence for Musculoskeletal disorders, PREVSAM) was evaluated in a randomised controlled trial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the process of implementing the PREVSAM model in primary care rehabilitation.

METHODS

This process evaluation was conducted alongside the trial, collecting quantitative and qualitative data to evaluate how the PREVSAM model was implemented, mechanisms of impact, and contextual factors. Acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, adaptations, training and support, resources, recruitment, reach, retention, dose, fidelity, and readiness for change were investigated. Qualitative data were collected from healthcare professionals and patients.

RESULTS

Eight of 22 invited rehabilitation clinics (36%) and 28 of 54 healthcare professionals (52%) were included in the PREVSAM trial and this process evaluation. Of 507 eligible patients, 261 (51%) were included. Of those, 134 were randomised to the intervention and 129 (96%) were retained. Twelve healthcare professionals and 15 patients participated in the qualitative evaluations. The model's essential components; individual assessments and structured, team-based rehabilitation with clear division of responsibilities agreed in a joint health plan; were generally delivered according to protocol. The optional components early access to psychological treatment and workplace contact were delivered to a lesser extent. Perceived acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of the PREVSAM model were moderate to high. Several contextual barriers, in the form of missing prerequisites, affected the implementation. Qualitative data showed that the model, with its holistic view, was appreciated by both healthcare professionals and patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This process evaluation suggests that PREVSAM is acceptable, feasible and appropriate for patients with MSDs reporting psychological risk factors associated with increased risk for sickness absence. While essential components were implemented with fidelity for most patients, optional components were not. This variability reflects the complexity of the model, its mandatory and optional components, contextual barriers, and the person-centred approach meeting individual patient needs. As all model components were not delivered to all patients, the intervention may have been too similar to treatment as usual to detect differences on a group level. A limitation of the study is that half of the participating rehabilitation clinics withdrew prematurely.

Clinical reasoning skills of German and Dutch manual therapists: a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Reflective clinical reasoning (CR) is believed to play a crucial role in achieving an efficient therapy process, supported by evidence-based approaches that improve patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the CR process of German manual therapists (MTs) using the CR skills of Dutch MTs as a reference.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study evaluated the CR process and diagnostic ability of German MTs. Dutch MTs served as the reference standard due to their experience with direct access. The CR skills were assessed using the Diagnostic Thinking Inventory (DTI), a questionnaire measuring diagnostic competence. Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted to compare the groups. Subgroup analyses were performed to analyze the influence of work experience (in years) and the level of education on CR.

RESULTS

396 manual therapists (229 German and 167 Dutch) completed the DTI. Dutch MTs revealed higher DTI sum-scores compared to German MTs (p < .001; Cohen´s d = .41). Subgroup analyses regarding professional education revealed no significant differences in DTI sum-scores within German MTs and between both groups. In the subgroup analyses regarding professional experience, differences of moderate effect size were reached between German and Dutch novice MTs (in favor of Dutch novice MTs; p = .001; Cohen´s d = .62), and between German novice MTs and experienced German MTs (in favor of experienced German MTs; p < .001; Cohen´s d = .6).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that academically educated German and Dutch MTs as well as experienced German and Dutch MTs are similar in terms of their hypothetical-deductive CR skills. In turn, German novice MTs seem to use hypothetical-deductive processing to a lesser extent compared to Dutch novice MTs and experienced German MTs, which in turn may support the hypothesis that the level of professional experience and education has a significant impact on the development of hypothetical-deductive CR skills.

Outcomes of direct access telehealth physical therapy for patients with musculoskeletal pain: a single cohort observational retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Telehealth direct access physical therapy is becoming more prevalent in the management of outpatient musculoskeletal pain. This innovative model affords more opportunity to reach potential patients who otherwise would not be able to access services due to geographical isolation, travel barriers, and timely access to quality care.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to investigate if pain, function, and ability to perform jobs improved after direct access telehealth physical therapy in patients with musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

A single cohort retrospective design was implemented to offer telehealth physical therapy to patients with musculoskeletal pain from March to November 2021. Eligible patients were at least 18 years old, located in California, and had a history of peripartum pelvic dysfunction, muscle pain, joint pain, or neural symptoms. Paired-samples t-tests and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to analyze normally distributed and non-parametric data (α = 0.05), respectively, to compare pretest and post scores.

RESULTS

Based on 89 participants, paired-samples t-tests showed statistically significant differences in function [t(87) = 20.71, p < .0001] and pain [t(82) = -8.15, p < .0001]. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test showed statistically significant differences in ability to perform job (Z = -7.345, p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that in a cohort of individuals with multiregional musculoskeletal pain, there was a decrease in pain and improvements in function and ability to perform job after direct access telehealth physical therapy.

Reducing strain on primary healthcare systems through innovative models of care: the impact of direct access physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions-an interrupted time series analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the longitudinal impact of introducing a national, direct access physiotherapy model of care on the rates of primary and secondary care consultations for musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions.

DESIGN

Interrupted time series analysis using segmented linear regression.

SETTING

Norway primary care PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 82 072 participants was derived from 3 population-based health surveys conducted across separate geographical regions in Norway. All participants surveyed were eligible for inclusion as a national representative sample of the Norwegian population. Registered MSK consultations were linked to the Norwegian Control and Payment of Health Reimbursement database and the Norwegian Patient Register using the International Classification of Primary Care diagnostic medical codes L-chapter for MSK conditions and spine related International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes.

INTERVENTION

Direct access to physiotherapy model of care introduced nationally in Norway in 2018. This model allowed Norwegians to consult directly with qualified physiotherapists for MSK conditions (eg, back pain, knee osteoarthritis) without the need for a medical referral in order to claim a social security reimbursement.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED

Rates of primary care consultations per 10 000 population (general practitioner (GP) and physiotherapist consultations) and secondary care (specialist consultations and surgical procedures) measured from 2014 to 2021.

RESULTS

The introduction of the direct access physiotherapy model was associated with an immediate stepped reduction of 391 general practice consultations per 10 000 population, (95% CI: -564 to -216), without an associated change in physiotherapy consultations. Subgroup analyses suggested there was an associated reduction in physiotherapy consultations for those in the lowest education group of 150 consultations per quarter (95% CI:-203 to -97), 70 consultations per quarter in the intermediate education group (95% CI:-115 to -27) and a stepped reduction of 2 spinal surgical procedures per 10 000 population, for those aged between 40 and 60 years (95% CI: -3 to -1) following the introduction of the direct access physiotherapy model.

CONCLUSION

The national introduction of a direct access to physiotherapy model of care was associated with a reduction in the workload of GPs for the management of MSK conditions. The use of physiotherapists in direct contact roles is a potential strategic model to reduce the burden on the GP workforce in primary care worldwide.

Physiotherapy educators' perceptions of physiotherapists' competencies and continuing education in the practice of musculoskeletal physiotherapy direct access

INTRODUCTION

The aim of direct access (DA) physiotherapy practice in Finland is the treatment of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions by physiotherapists who have completed continuing DA education. It is difficult to pinpoint the competencies of DA physiotherapists as their roles and scope of practice varies.

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to explore the competencies and education of DA physiotherapists through the perceptions of DA educators.

METHODS

Data were collected through individual semi-structured interviews of eleven Finnish physiotherapy educators who described their perceptions of DA physiotherapists' competencies and their continuing DA education. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and then examined using a reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Two main themes were formulated on the basis of the data, conveying the educators' perceptions. The first theme, Interaction as grounds for meaningful clinical reasoning, had two subthemes: Meaningful encounter and Rationally and safely locating the core of the client's problem. The second theme, Continuing professional development in an expert role, had four subthemes: Continuous learning, Self-reflection, Deep understanding and Taking responsibility for one's own expertise.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed how DA educators perceive the competencies of DA physiotherapists. The findings highlight the perceived significance of the physiotherapists' interaction with the client as a ground for meaningful clinical reasoning, and their responsibility for their own continuing professional self-development.

Differential screen and treatment of sternocleidomastoid syndrome versus eagle syndrome: a case report

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Differential screening is a complex process in chronic pain conditions. There is significant uncertainty that surrounds the pathophysiology of many chronic pain syndromes that may lead to misdiagnosis and treatment failures. Such differential screening is even more challenging where there is regional overlapping from surrounding tissues. This case report chronicles the differential screening and treatment of a patient with sternocleidomastoid syndrome (SCMS) originally diagnosed as Eagle's syndrome (ES).

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 55-year-old woman, referred to a physical therapist (PT) by an ear, nose and throat (ENT) physician with the diagnosis of ES. The patient complained of yearlong left-sided otalgia, blurred vision, excessive lacrimation, dysphagia, hyperesthesia on the left side of the face, unilateral temporal headaches, and both left mandibular and anterior neck pain.

OUTCOMES

The PT examination revealed the patient did not exhibit hallmark findings for clinical confirmation of ES and instead demonstrated multiple signs consistent with SCMS.

DISCUSSION

Manual therapy techniques and therapeutic exercises resolved the patient's year-long chronic symptoms within 6 sessions.

Comparison of self-management and spa therapy for upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are common in the workplace and are a public health issue. Persistent pain despite conservative treatment or surgery may lead to poor long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of a combined 6-day program of exercise, self-management workshops and spa therapy with self-management on functional capacity in personal and professional daily life at 3 months in people with musculoskeletal disorders.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Participants were employed (any type of work) and aged between 18 and 65 years, with latent or symptomatic upper extremity MSDs, with or without a history of sick leave. They were randomized to participate in 6 days (2 h per day) of spa therapy, exercise, and self-management workshops immediately (intervention) or at 3 months (control). The control group performed self-management until 3 months. The primary outcome was the score on the self-reported Quick Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand (QuickDASH) at 3 months. The primary analysis was conducted using analysis of covariance with baseline QuickDASH score as the covariate.

RESULTS

In total, 150 participants were randomized (85 % women): 78 to the control group and 72 to the intervention group. At 3 months, the QuickDASH total and work scores did not differ between groups (effect-size [ES] = -0.15, 95 %CI, -0.38 to 0.09, p = 0.215, and ES = -0.11, 95 % CI, -0.35 to 0.12, p = 0.343). However, QuickDASH sport/performing arts score was significantly different between randomization groups at 3 months (ES =-0.25, 95 % CI, -0.48 to -0.02, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided no evidence in favor of a short-course, personalized self-management, intensive spa therapy intervention over self-management alone for the management of upper-extremity MSDs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02702466) retrospectively registered.

First-contact physiotherapists' perceived competency in a new model of care for low back pain patients: a mixed methods study

Background

A new advanced practice model of care enables French physiotherapists to perform medical acts for low back pain (LBP) patients as first-contact physiotherapists (FCPs).

Objective

The aim of this study is to determine the self-perceived competency of FCPs and to further explore factors underpinning this feeling.

Methods

A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was conducted. A survey was used to self-assess the perceived competency of FCPs in performing medical tasks. Semi-structured interviews were then performed to explore determining factors of perceived competency. Inductive thematic analysis was performed.

Results

Nine FCPs answered the survey and were interviewed (mean age 40.1, standard deviation [SD]: ±10.0). FCPs felt very competent with making medical diagnosis (3.44/4, SD: ±0.53), analgesic prescription (3.11, SD: ±0.78) and referring onward to physiotherapy (3.78, SD: ±0.55). They did not feel competent with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug prescription (2.78, SD: ±0.67) and issuing sick leave certificate (2.67, SD: ±1.0). The main identified influencing factors were previous FCPs' experience, training, knowledge, collaboration with family physicians, high responsibility and risk management associated with decision-making.

Conclusion

French FCPs appeared to have the necessary skills to directly manage LBP patients without medical referral. Future training focusing on analgesic prescription and issuing sick leave certificate is however needed.

Impact of direct access on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy: a scoping review from a patient, provider, and societal perspective

Introduction

Worldwide many countries provide direct access in physiotherapy. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize the available evidence on the quality of primary care musculoskeletal physiotherapy from different perspectives.

Methods

Systematic searches were conducted in three databases up to September 2022. Studies were included when regarding assessment of at least one of the following perspectives: patient (quality of Life, patient satisfaction, pain, functioning, adverse events), provider (treatment compliance, responsibility, liability, status, prestige, job satisfaction), and society (number of referrals, amount of medical imaging, medication use, number of sessions needed for rehabilitation, and overall costs and cost-effectiveness). Selection and methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews were performed. Data extraction and analysis were performed separately for systematic reviews and individual primary studies.

Results

Five systematic reviews as well as 17 primary studies were included. From a patient perspective, no significant effect of direct access was found for pain and a tendency in favour of direct access was found for quality of life, functioning, and well-being. Concerning providers, higher treatment compliance was found in direct access to physiotherapy and decision-making was more accurate. From a societal perspective, significant differences in favour of direct access physiotherapy were found for waiting time, prescribed medication, and medical imaging. In addition, there was a tendency towards lower health care costs.

Conclusions

Emerging evidence suggests that direct access physiotherapy could provide at least equal quality of care for patients and better opportunities for providers and the society on selected outcomes.

Core competencies for first contact physiotherapists in a direct access model of care for adults with musculoskeletal disorders: A scoping review

INTRODUCTION

To optimise the management of Musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs), many countries have implemented direct access to physiotherapy; however, the core competencies required for first contact physiotherapists (PTs) have not been precisely defined. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and describe the core competencies required for first contact PTs treating adults with MSKDs.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the literature by searching eight databases and grey literature up to July 2023. We performed a thematic analysis of the competencies identified based on predefined themes relevant to first contact physiotherapy in direct access models in primary or emergency care settings.

RESULTS

Sixty-five articles were included. Seventeen core competencies were identified and grouped into 5 themes: (1) Assessment and examination; (2) Management and interventions; (3) Communication; (4) Cooperation and collaboration; and (5) Professionalism and leadership.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide an international perspective on the core competencies required for first contact PTs.

Description of the abilities of physiotherapists in terms of diagnostic hypothesis and management decision for self-referred patients with musculoskeletal disorders in France using clinical vignettes: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Direct access to physiotherapy has been introduced in several countries. In France, the healthcare system is evolving towards its introduction; however, no study has described the ability of physiotherapists in this context.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the ability of physiotherapists practicing in France to formulate correct diagnostic hypotheses and make appropriate management decisions using clinical vignettes.

METHODS

Pre-existing validated clinical vignettes were used and integrated into a numerical questionnaire. The percentages of correct answers were calculated from the results concerning the choice of diagnostic hypothesis and the management decision, both overall and for the three different patient categories: musculoskeletal, non-critical medical, and critical medical.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty-two participants (1.7%) responded to the study. For the formulation of a diagnostic hypothesis, there were 43.0% (415/964), 26.6% (128/482), and 17.8% (86/482) correct answers respectively for the musculoskeletal, non-critical medical, and critical medical categories. For management decisions, there were 60.8% (586/964), 61.6% (297/482), and 85.1% (410/482) correct answers respectively for the same categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results related to the management decision were better than those for the diagnostic hypothesis, especially for the critical medical category. There is still room for improvement. It might be interesting to support this initial study by using more clinical vignettes validated in a French context.

Diagnostic and decision-making abilities of Swiss physiotherapists in a simulated direct access setting

BACKGROUND

Direct access to physiotherapy requires physiotherapists to recognize red flags and determine adequate management plans.

PURPOSE

Investigate Swiss physiotherapists' ability to diagnose and triage patients in a simulated direct access setting and whether their characteristics were associated with correct diagnoses and decision-making.

METHODS

We conducted a national online survey using a questionnaire containing 12 first-contact case scenarios. A linear mixed model estimated scores for correct diagnoses and management decisions, differences between musculoskeletal (MSK), non-critical medical (non-CrM), and critical medical (CrM) case scenarios, and the estimated effects of physiotherapists' characteristics.

RESULTS

The linear mixed model of data from 1492 participants estimated 55.0% correct diagnoses (62.7% for non-CrM, 61.7% for MSK, and 40.5% for CrM scenarios) and 71.2% correct management decisions (78.1% for non-CrM, 73.0% for MSK, and 62.3% for CrM scenarios). For correct diagnoses, the 'academic education/continuing education' variable showed significant estimated effects for the MSK and CrM scenarios, as did 'professional experience' for the non-CrM scenarios, and the '≥ 50% musculoskeletal patients in consultations' variable for all scenario groups. For correct management decisions, 'academic education/continuing education' variable showed significant estimated effects in CrM scenarios, as did 'professional experience' in non-CrM and CrM scenarios, and the '≥ 50% musculoskeletal patients in consultations' variable in MSK scenarios.

CONCLUSION

The estimated effects of physiotherapists' characteristics on correct diagnoses and management decisions showed substantial heterogeneity. Improving Swiss physiotherapists' screening abilities remains important. Further research is required to develop innovative educational concepts and improve training for screening for red flags.

Effectiveness and Consequences of Direct Access in Physiotherapy: A Systematic Review

Background. Direct access in physiotherapy (DAPT) occurs when a patient has the ability to self-refer to physical therapy without physician referral. This model of care in musculoskeletal diseases (MSDs) has shown better outcomes than the traditional-based medical model of care that requires physician referral to access physiotherapist services. This traditional physician referral often results in a delay in care. Unfortunately, DAPT is still not permitted in many countries. Objectives. The primary objective of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness, safety, and the accuracy of DAPT compared to the physician-led model of care for the management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The secondary objective of the present study is to define the physiotherapists' characteristics or qualifications involved in DAPT. Materials and methods. Databases searched included: Medline, Scopus and Web of Science. Databases were searched from their inception to July 2022. Research strings were developed according to the PICO model of clinical questions (patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome). Free terms or synonyms (e.g., physical therapy; primary health care; direct access; musculoskeletal disease; cost-effectiveness) and when possible MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms were used and combined with Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT). Risk of bias assessment was carried out through Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB-2) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. Authors conducted a qualitative analysis of the results through narrative analysis and narrative synthesis. The narrative analysis was provided for an extraction of the key concepts and common meanings of the different studies, while the summary narrative provided a textual combination of data. In addition, a quantitative analysis was conducted comparing the analysis of the mean and differences between the means. Results. Twenty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Results show that DAPT had a high referral accuracy and a reduction in the rate of return visits. The medical model had a higher use of imaging, drugs, and referral to another specialist. DAPT was found to be more cost-effective than the medical model. DAPT resulted in better work-related outcomes and was superior when considering patient satisfaction. There were no adverse events noted in any of the studies. In regard to health outcomes, there was no difference between models. ROB-2 shows an intermediate risk of bias risk for the RCTs with an average of 6/9 points for the NOS scale for observational studies. Conclusion. DAPT is a safe, less expensive, reliable triage and management model of care that results in higher levels of satisfaction for patients compared to the traditional medical model. Prospero Registration Number: CRD42022349261.

Physical Therapists Ordering Imaging and Making Direct Referrals in a Military Healthcare Setting; Two Case Studies

Physical therapists in the military are allowed some of the widest scope-of-practice privileges in the USA. These privileges include ordering imaging, making direct referrals, and serving as direct-access providers. This independent functioning model may help contribute to more efficient and effective patient care. In this study, two cases are presented to highlight the decision-making process of physical therapists who were able to order imaging and make direct referrals that contributed to successful patient outcomes. The purpose of this study is 2-fold: (1) to highlight physical therapists ordering diagnostic imaging and (2) to correlate physical therapists making direct referrals. The first case involves an active duty military female who sustained an ankle injury. She was referred to physical therapy and underwent conservative treatment with minimal progress. The physical therapist used her privileges to order imaging, interpreted the findings, and referred the patient to an experienced podiatric surgeon. The second case involves an active duty military male who sustained a knee injury. He was referred directly to physical therapy by the hospital urgent care. The military physical therapist evaluated him and determined that an orthopedic referral was necessary. Both of the prior mentioned cases resulted in successful outcomes, with patients returning to their prior level of function. In the military healthcare setting, physical therapists have a unique set of practice privileges that can contribute to timely patient management, improved patient satisfaction, and more efficient and effective care. This healthcare model may be considered in civilian settings in the future as well.

Financial Impact of Embedded Injury-Prevention Experts in US Army Initial Entry Training

CONTEXT

The US Army embedded injury-prevention experts (IPEs), specifically athletic trainers and strength and conditioning coaches, into initial entry training (IET) to limit musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions and their negative consequences. However, little is known about the financial impact of IPEs.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether IPEs were associated with fewer sunk training costs due to MSK-related early discharges from service.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Database of US Army soldiers' administrative, medical, and readiness records.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 198 166 soldiers (age = 20.7 ± 3.2 years, body mass index = 24.4 ± 3.5 kg/m2) who began IET during 2014 to 2017.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Early discharge from service was defined as occurring within 6 months of beginning IET. All IET sites employed IPEs from 2011 to 2017, except for 2 sites during April to November 2015. Soldiers who began IET at these 2 sites during these times were categorized as not having IPE exposure. All others were categorized as having IPE exposure. The unadjusted association between IPE access and MSK-related early discharge from service was assessed using logistic regression. Financial impact was assessed by quantifying differences in yearly sunk costs between groups with and those without IPE exposure and subtracting IPE hiring costs.

RESULTS

Among 14 094 soldiers without IPE exposure, 2.77% were discharged early for MSK-related reasons. Among 184 072 soldiers with IPE exposure, 1.01% were discharged. Exposure to IPEs was associated with reduced odds of MSK-related early discharge (odds ratio = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.32, 0.40, P < .001) and a decrease in yearly sunk training costs of $11.19 to $20.00 million.

CONCLUSIONS

Employing IPEs was associated with reduced sunk costs because of fewer soldiers being discharged from service early for MSK-related reasons. Evidence-based recommendations should be developed for guiding policy on the roles and responsibilities of IPEs in the military to reduce negative outcomes from MSK conditions and generate a positive return on investment.

Headache, Loss of Smell, and Visual Disturbances: Symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 Infection? A Case Report

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this case report is to describe the main components of the history and physical examination that led to idiopathic intracranial hypertension differential diagnosis, which initially was investigated as COVID-19.

METHODS (CASE DESCRIPTION)

A 28-year-old woman complaining of constant headache and loss of smell and taste was suspected as SARS-CoV-2 infection by her general practitioner. She underwent 3 molecular swab tests, all negative, then decided to seek her physical therapist for relieving headache.

RESULTS

The full cranial nerve examination revealed impaired olfactory (CNI), abducens (CN VI), and facial (CN VII) nerves, leading the physical therapist to refer the patient to a neurosurgeon for a suspected central nervous system involvement. The neurosurgeon prescribed a detailed MRI and an ophthalmologic examination, which allowed for the final diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

CONCLUSION

An urgent lumbo-peritoneal shunting surgery resolved the patient's symptoms and saved her sight. Despite the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, health care professionals must pay attention to properly investigating patients' signs and symptoms using comprehensive clinical reasoning, considering the screening for referral to specialist medical attention.

IMPACT

A thorough physical examination is required for every patient even if patients' signs and symptoms are in line with apparent common and widespread pathologies. Cranial nerve evaluation is an essential component of the physical therapist assessment and decision-making process. The ongoing pandemic highlighted the fundamental assistance of physical therapists toward physicians in the screening and management of musculoskeletal diseases.

Diagnostic Imaging for Distal Extremity Injuries in Direct Access Physical Therapy: An Observational Study

Background

Military physical therapists practicing direct-access routinely utilize diagnostic imaging and numerous published case reports demonstrate the ability of physical therapists to diagnose and appropriately disposition patients with foot/ankle and wrist/hand fractures. However, no larger cohort studies have explored the utilization of diagnostic imaging by physical therapists to detect fractures.

Hypothesis/Purpose

To describe the utilization of diagnostic imaging in foot/ankle and wrist/hand injuries by physical therapists in a direct-access sports physical therapy clinic.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Methods

The Agfa Impax Client 6 image viewing software (IMPAX) was searched from 2014 to 2018 for patients with diagnostic imaging ordered for foot/ankle and wrist/hand injuries. The Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA) electronic medical record was independently reviewed by the principal and co-investigator physical therapists. Data extracted were demographics and elements from the patient history and physical examination.

Results

In foot/ankle injuries, physical therapists diagnosed a fracture in 16% of the 177 cases and waited for an average of 3.9 days and 1.3 visits before ordering imaging. In wrist/hand injuries, physical therapists diagnosed a fracture in 24% of the 178 cases and waited for an average of 3.7 days and 1.2 visits before ordering imaging. The time to definitive care from the initial physical therapy evaluation was significantly different (p = 0.04) for foot/ankle fractures (0.6 days) compared to wrist/hand fractures (5.0 days). The Ottawa Ankle Rules demonstrated a negative likelihood ratio (-LR) of 0.11 (0.02, 0.72) and a positive likelihood ratio (+LR) of 1.99 (1.62, 2.44) for the diagnosis of foot/ankle fracture.

Conclusions

Physical therapists utilizing diagnostic imaging in a direct-access sports physical therapy clinic diagnosed fractures in similar proportions for foot/ankle and wrist/hand injuries and quickly dispositioned patients to definitive care for those fractures. The diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle Rules was similar to previously reported values.

Level of Evidence

Level 3.

Medical Clearance of Older Adults Participating in Preventative Direct Access Physical Therapy

Background The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of evidence-based cognitive and cardiovascular screening prior to initiating a prevention-focused exercise program that utilizes a physical therapist (PT) direct consumer access referral model is safe. Methods A retrospective descriptive analysis of data from a prior randomized controlled trial (RCT) was performed. Two data sets emerged: Group S was screened for study inclusion but not enrolled, and Group E was enrolled and participated in preventative exercise. Participant outcomes of cognitive screenings (Mini-Cog, Trail Making Test-Part B) and cardiovascular screening (American College of Sports Medicine Exercise Pre-participation Health Screening) were extracted. Descriptive statistics were generated for demographic and outcome variables and inferential statistics were analyzed (p < 0.05). Results Records from 70 individuals (Group S) and 144 individuals (Group E) were available for analysis. Overall, 18.6% (n = 13) in Group S were not enrolled due to medical instability or potential safety considerations. The need for medical clearance prior to initiating an exercise program was identified and then clearance was obtained for 40% (n = 58) of the participants in Group E. No adverse events related to program participation were reported. Conclusions A PT-led program utilizing direct access referrals from senior centers offers a safe option for older adults to participate in individualized preventative exercise programming.

Patient attitudes and beliefs associated with self-referral to physical therapy for musculoskeletal complaints: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Non-pharmacologic treatments such as physical therapy (PT) are advocated for musculoskeletal pain. Early access to PT through self-referral has been shown to decrease costs and improve outcomes. Although self-referral is permitted in most U.S. states and supported by some health insurance plans, patients' utilization of self-referral remains low.

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors, beyond legislative policies and health insurance, associated with patients' decisions to access physical therapy through self-referral or provider-referral.

METHODS

We recruited 26 females and 6 males whose employer-sponsored insurance benefits included financial incentives for self-referral to physical therapy. Between August 2017 and March 2018, participants completed semi-structured interviews about their beliefs about physical therapy and reasons for choosing self-referral (15 participants) or provider referral (17 participants) for accessing physical therapy. Grounded theory approach was employed to identify themes in the data.

RESULTS

Patients selecting self-referral reported major thematic differences compared to the provider-referral patients including knowledge of the direct access program, attitudes and beliefs about physical therapy and pharmacologic treatment, and prior experiences with physical therapy. Self-referral patients were aware that their plan benefits included reduced cost for self-referral and felt confident in selecting that pathway. They also had negative beliefs about the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments and surgery, and previously had positive direct or indirect experiences with physical therapy.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of the ability to self-refer, attitudes and beliefs about treatment, and prior experience with physical therapy were associated with self-referral to physical therapy. Interventions aimed at improving knowledge and changing attitudes toward self-referral to physical therapy to increase utilization appear warranted.

Neoplastic malignant cord compression mimicking low back pain: A case report

BACKGROUND

The point prevalence of Cauda Equina Syndrome (CES) as a cause of Low Back Pain (LBP) is estimated at 0.04% in primary care, and it is reported as a complication in about 2% of patients with disc herniation. Compression of the cauda equina usually occurs as a result of disc prolapse. However, CES may be caused by any space-occupying lesion, including spinal stenosis, neoplasms, cysts, infection, and osteophytes. First contact physiotherapists may encounter patients with early CES, as the clinical presentation of CES can mimic non-specific LBP.

CASE PRESENTATION

This case report presents the medical history, diagnostic tests and relevant clinical data of a 52-year-old man complaining of LBP. The patient's medical history, his symptoms and the clinical findings led to the identification of a number of red flags (i.e. risk factors) suggestive of a non-musculoskeletal condition. The patient was referred to the emergency department for further investigation. Having undergone several diagnostic tests, the patient was diagnosed with CES due to malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report highlights the importance of differential screening throughout the treatment period, in order to identify red flags that warrant further investigation and a referral to an appropriate specialist. Physiotherapy screening should include clinical reasoning, careful analysis of clinical presentation and symptom progression, in addition to appropriate referral for medical assessment and diagnostic imaging, if necessary.

Intracranial Epidermoid Cyst Mimics Musculoskeletal Shoulder Disease: Findings from a Case Report in Physiotherapy Clinical Practice

Shoulder pain is often attributable to a musculoskeletal disorder, but in some instances, it may be linked to pathologies outside the physiotherapist's area of expertise. Specifically, some intracranial problems can cause pain and disability to the shoulder complex. This case report aims to describe the clinical presentation, history taking, physical examination, and clinical decision-making procedures in a patient with an intracranial epidermoid cyst mimicking a musculoskeletal disorder of the shoulder girdle. A 42-year-old man complained of pain and disability in his left shoulder. Sudden, sharp pain was reported during overhead movements, associated with intermittent tingling of the left upper trapezius and left scapular area. Moreover, the patient reported reduced hearing in his left ear and left facial dysesthesia. The physical examination led the physiotherapist to hypothesize a pathology outside the physiotherapist's scope of practice and to refer the patient to another health professional to further investigate the patient through imaging. It is essential for the physiotherapist to recognize when the patient's clinical condition requires a referral to another healthcare professional. Therefore, the physiotherapist must be able to, in a timely manner, identify signs and symptoms suggesting the presence of medical pathology beyond his expertise, through appropriate medical history collection and physical evaluation.

Revitalizing Primary Care, Part 2: Hopes for the Future

Part 1 of this essay argued that the root causes of primary care's problems lie in (1) the low percent of national health expenditures dedicated to primary care and (2) overly large patient panels that clinicians without a team are unable to manage, leading to widespread burnout and poor patient access. Part 2 explores policies and practice changes that could solve or mitigate these primary care problems.Initiatives attempting to improve primary care are discussed. Diffuse multi-component initiatives-patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs), accountable care organizations (ACOs), and Comprehensive Primary Care Plus (CPC+)-have had limited success in addressing primary care's core problems. More focused initiatives-care management, open access, and telehealth-offer more promise.To truly revitalize primary care, 2 fundamental changes are needed: (1) a substantially greater percent of health expenditures dedicated to primary care, and (2) the building of powerful teams that add capacity to care for large panels while reducing burnout.Part 2 of the essay reviews 3 approaches to increasing primary care spending: state-level legislation, eliminating Medicare's disparity between primary care and procedural specialty reimbursement, and efforts by health systems. The final section of Part 2 addresses the building of powerful core and interprofessional teams.

A call to action: direct access to physical therapy is highly successful in the US military. When will professional bodies, legislatures, and payors provide the same advantages to all US civilian physical therapists?

OBJECTIVES

In 2000, the American PT Association (APTA) published its Vision statement advocating for DA (DA) to PT. This narrative review of the literature aims to identify the current state of DA in the United States (US) and compare that status to the US Military.

METHODS

Initial PubMed search in the English language with keywords physical therapy (PT), physiotherapy, DA, self-referral, and primary contact from the year 2000 onwards with subsequent focused searches using keywords DA/self-referral/primary contact of physical therapists/physiotherapists on outcomes/autonomous practice/economic impact/patient satisfaction yielded 103 applicable studies on the topic. This paper excluded 40 international articles to focus on US military and civilian research.

RESULTS

Current literature supports Physical Therapists (PTs) in an initial contact role based on patient safety, satisfaction, access to care, efficiency, healthcare utilization, and potential cost savings.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its success in the US Military, DA to PT in the US civilians remains limited and incomplete. PTs still await unrestricted DA and privileges associated with autonomous practice including the ability to order imaging and prescribe some medications.

Physiotherapist or physician as primary assessor for patients with suspected knee osteoarthritis in primary care - a cost-effectiveness analysis of a pragmatic trial

Background

Over the next decade, the number of osteoarthritis consultations in health care is expected to increase. Physiotherapists may be considered equally qualified as primary assessors as physicians for patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, economic evaluations of this model of care have not yet been described. To determine whether physiotherapists as primary assessors for patients with suspected knee osteoarthritis in primary care are a cost-effective alternative compared with traditional physician-led care, we conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized controlled pragmatic trial.

Methods

Patients were randomized to be assessed and treated by either a physiotherapist or physician first in primary care. A cost-effectiveness analysis compared costs and effects in quality adjusted life years (QALY) for the different care models. Analyses were applied with intention to treat, using complete case dataset, and missing data approaches included last observation carried forward and multiple imputation. Non-parametric bootstrapping was conducted to assess sampling uncertainty, presented with a cost-effectiveness plane and cost-effectiveness acceptability curve.

Results

69 patients were randomized to a physiotherapist (n = 35) or physician first (n = 34). There were significantly higher costs for physician visits and radiography in the physician group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01). Both groups improved their health-related quality of life 1 year after assessment compared with baseline. There were no statistically significant differences in QALYs or total costs between groups. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for physiotherapist versus physician was savings of 24,266 €/lost QALY (societal perspective) and 15,533 €/lost QALY (health care perspective). There is a 72–80% probability that physiotherapist first for patients with suspected knee osteoarthritis is less costly and differs less than ±0.1 in QALY compared to traditional physician-led care.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that physiotherapist-led care model might reduce health care costs and lead to marginally less QALYs, but confidence intervals were wide and overlapped no difference at all. Health consequences depending on the profession of the first assessor for knee osteoarthritis seem to be comparable for physiotherapists and physicians. Direct access to physiotherapist in primary care seems to lead to fewer physician consultations and radiography. However, larger clinical trials and qualitative studies to evaluate patients’ perception of this model of care are needed.

Clinical trial registration

The study was retrospectively registered in clinicaltrial.gov, ID: NCT03822533.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05201-3.

Strategies to reduce waiting times in outpatient rehabilitation services for adults with physical disabilities: A systematic literature review

Objective

Identifying effective strategies to reduce waiting times is a crucial issue in many areas of health services. Long waiting times for rehabilitation services have been associated with numerous adverse effects in people with disabilities. The main objective of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to assess the effectiveness of service redesign strategies to reduce waiting times in outpatient rehabilitation services for adults with physical disabilities.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review, searching three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE) from their inception until May 2021. We identified studies with comparative data evaluating the effect of rehabilitation services redesign strategies on reducing waiting times. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results

Nineteen articles including various settings and populations met the selection criteria. They covered physiotherapy ( n = 11), occupational therapy ( n = 2), prosthetics ( n = 1), exercise physiology ( n = 1) and multidisciplinary ( n = 4) services. The methodological quality varied ( n = 10 high quality, n = 6 medium, n = 3 low); common flaws being missing information on the pre-redesign setting and characteristics of the populations. Seven articles assessed access processes or referral management strategies (e.g. self-referral), four focused on extending/modifying the roles of service providers (e.g. to triage) and eight changed the model of care delivery (e.g. mode of intervention). The different redesign strategies had positive effects on waiting times in outpatient rehabilitation services.

Conclusions

This review highlights the positive effects of many service redesign strategies. These findings suggest that there are several effective strategies to choose from to reduce waiting times and help better respond to the needs of persons experiencing physical disabilities.

Musculoskeletal Imaging for Low Back Pain in Direct Access Physical Therapy Compared to Primary Care: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Overutilization of diagnostic imaging is associated with poor outcomes and increased costs. Physical therapists demonstrate the ability to order diagnostic imaging safely and appropriately, and early access to physical therapy reduces unnecessary imaging, lowers healthcare costs, and improves outcomes.

HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this study was to compare rates of compliance with the National Committee for Quality Assurance - Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) recommendations for diagnostic imaging in low back pain between physical therapists and primary care providers in young, athletic patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) data from January 2019 to May 2020 was reviewed for compliance with the low back pain HEDIS recommendation. The low back pain imaging HEDIS measure identifies the percentage of patients who did not have an imaging study (plain X-ray, MRI, CT Scan) ordered on the first encounter with a diagnosis of low back pain or in the 28 days following that first diagnosis. Chi-square tests compared HEDIS compliance rates, with α = 0.05 set a priori.

RESULTS

From January 2019 to May 2020, in patients age 18-24, the MDR database identified 1,845 total visits for LBP identified in the Physical Therapy Clinic and 467 total visits for LBP in the Primary Care Clinic. In the Physical Therapy Clinic, 96.7% of encounters did not have imaging ordered within the first 28 days of onset of symptoms, compared with 82.0% in the Primary Care Clinic (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing data from a national standardized healthcare performance measure, physical therapists practicing in a direct-access setting were significantly more likely than primary care providers to adhere to guidelines for low back pain imaging in young, athletic patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Can Physical Therapy Deliver Clinically Meaningful Improvements in Pain and Function through a Mobile App?: An Observational Retrospective Study

Objective

To examine the effect of digital physical therapy (PT) delivered by mobile application (app) on reducing pain and improving function for people with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions.

Design

An observational, longitudinal, retrospective study using survey data collected pre- and postdigital PT to estimate multilevel models with random intercepts for patient episodes.

Setting

Privately insured employees participating in app-based PT as an employer health care benefit.

Participants

The study sample included 814 participants (N=814) 18 years or older who completed their digital PT program with reported final clinical outcomes between February 2019 (program launch) through December 2020. Mean age of the sample at baseline was 40.9±11.89 years, 47.5% were female, 21% sought care for lower back pain, 16% for shoulders, 15% for knees, and 13% for neck.

Interventions

Digital PT consisted of a synchronous video evaluation with a physical therapist followed by a course of PT delivered through a mobile app.

Main Outcome Measures

Pain was measured by the visual analog scale from 0 “no pain” to 10 “worst pain imaginable” and physical function by the Patient-Specific Functional Scale on a scale from 0 “completely unable to perform” to 10 “able to perform normally.”

Results

After controlling for significant demographics, comorbid conditions, adverse symptoms, chronicity, and severity, the results from multilevel random intercept models showed decreased pain (−2.69 points; 95% CI, −2.86 to −2.53; P<.001) and increased physical function (+2.67 points; 95% CI, 2.45-2.89; P<.001) after treatment.

Conclusions

Digital PT was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function among a diverse set of participants. These early data are an encouraging indicator of the clinical benefit of digital PT.

Direct Access to Physical Therapy: Should Italy Move Forward?

Direct access to physical therapy (DAPT) is the patient’s ability to self-refer to a physical therapist, without previous consultation from any other professional. This model of care has been implemented in many healthcare systems since it has demonstrated better outcomes than traditional models of care. The model of DAPT mainly focuses on the management of musculoskeletal disorders, with a huge epidemiological burden and worldwide healthcare systems workload. Among the healthcare professionals, physical therapists are one of the most accessed for managing pain and disability related to musculoskeletal disorders. Additionally, the most updated guidelines recommend DAPT as a first-line treatment because of its cost-effectiveness, safety, and patients’ satisfaction compared to other interventions. DAPT was also adopted to efficiently face the diffuse crisis of the declining number of general practitioners, reducing their caseload by directly managing patients’ musculoskeletal disorders traditionally seen by general practitioners. World Physiotherapy organization also advocates DAPT as a new approach, with physical therapy in a primary care pathway to better control healthcare expenses. Thus, it is unclear why the Italian institutions have decided to recognize new professions instead of focusing on the growth of physical therapy, a long-established and autonomous health profession. Furthermore, it is unclear why DAPT is still not fully recognized, considering the historical context and its evidence. The future is now: although still preliminary, the evidence supporting DAPT is promising. Hard skills, academic paths, scientific evidence, and the legislature argue that this paradigm shift should occur in Italy.

Protocol for a cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial of the effect of direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy for adults with musculoskeletal pain

BACKGROUND

In the Danish healthcare system, direct access to physiotherapy is an option, but public subsidy for treatment requires referral from a general practitioner. To relieve general practice of unnecessary consultations and provide patients with easier access to relevant treatment, direct access to publicly subsidized physiotherapy has been suggested.

METHODS

Direct access to subsidized physiotherapy will be evaluated in a controlled design and has a duration of one year. Physiotherapy clinics invite eligible patients to participate in the evaluation. Participants complete questionnaires at baseline and six weeks and six months after baseline. Physical health status (ShortForm-12v2) is the primary outcome. In addition, the evaluation will assess the use of services in general practice, physiotherapy, specialists in private practice and hospitals and referrals to diagnostic imaging. A process evaluation will assess the attitude to and implementation of direct access to subsidized physiotherapy through the experiences and attitudes of local general practitioners, secretaries and physiotherapists in participating clinics.

DISCUSSION

This intervention may affect the point of entry to health care services. For the intervention group the physiotherapists assume responsibility in symptom assessment. During recruitment registration of red flags in physiotherapy is closely monitored. The results of the study may be used to assess if direct access to subsidized physiotherapy is a way to relieve the workload in general practice while maintaining or improving patient level outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The project was reported to The Committee on Health Research Ethics of the Capital Region of Denmark with protocol number J.nr.: H-19074802. The Committee assessed the project as not registrable and therefore can be implemented without further permission. This trial has been registered at the Danish Data Protection Agency (J.nr.: P-2019-672). The trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifiers: NCT04900480).

Implementation and initial evaluation of falls risk reduction resources in a rural Native American Community

Background

Although falls are common and can cause serious injury to older adults, many health care facilities do not have falls prevention resources available. Falls prevention resources can reduce injury and mortality rates. Using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths & Injuries (STEADI) model, a falls risk clinic was implemented in a rural Indian Health Service (IHS) facility.

Methods

A Fall Risk Questionnaire was created and implemented into the Provider’s Electronic Health Records system interface to streamline provider screening and referral of patients who may be at risk for falls to a group falls risk reduction class.

Results

Participants exhibited average improvements in the Timed Up and Go (6.8 s) (P = 0.0001), Five-Time Sit-to-Stand (5.1 s) (P = 0.0002), and Functional Reach (3.6 inches) (P = 1.0) tests as compared to their own baseline. Results were analyzed via paired t test. 71% of participants advanced out of an “increased risk for falls” category in at least one outcome measure. Of the participants to complete the clinic, all were successfully contacted and three (18%) reported one or more falls at the 90-day mark, of which one (6%) required a visit to the Emergency Department but did not require hospital admission.

Conclusions

In regards to reducing falls in the community, per the CDC STEADI model, an integrated approach is best. All clinicians can play a part in reducing elder falls.

A primary care team approach to secondary prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: Physical therapy perspectives

BACKGROUND

Among work-related conditions in the United States, musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) account for about thirty-four percent of work absences. Primary care physicians (PCPs) play an essential role in the management of work-related MSDs. For conditions diagnosed as work-related, up to seventeen percent of cases are PCP managed; within these conditions, up to fifty-nine percent are diagnosed as musculoskeletal. Negative factors in treatment success confronting PCPs include time constraints and unfamiliarity with work-related MSDs. A multidimensional team approach to secondary prevention, where PCPs can leverage the expertise of allied health professionals, might provide a useful alternative to current PCP practices for the treatment of work-related MSDs.

OBJECTIVE

Provide the structure of and rationale for an "extended care team" within primary care for the management of work-related MSDs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search, combining medical subject headings and keywords, were used to examine eight peer-reviewed literature databases. Gray literature, such as government documents, were also used.

RESULTS

An extended care team would likely consist of at least nine stakeholders within primary care. Among these stakeholders, advanced practice orthopedic physical therapists can offer particularly focused guidance to PCPs on the evaluation and treatment of work-related MSDs.

CONCLUSIONS

A multidimensional approach has the potential to accelerate access and improve quality of work-related outcomes, while maintaining patient safety.

Clinical Guidance to Optimize Work Participation After Injury or Illness: The Role of Physical Therapists

Work rehabilitation refers to the process of assisting workers to remain at work or return to work (RTW) in a safe and productive manner, while limiting the negative impact of restricted work, unemployment, and work disability. The primary purpose of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to systematically review available scientific evidence and provide a set of evidence-based recommendations for effective physical therapy evaluation, treatment, and management of individuals experiencing limitations in the ability to participate in work following injury or illness. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(8):CPG1-CPG102. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0303.

Agreement and screening accuracy between physical therapists ratings and the Ӧrebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in screening for risk of chronic pain during Musculoskeletal evaluation

Introduction: Identifying patients at risk for chronic musculoskeletal pain can inform evaluation and treatment decisions. The ability of physical therapists to assess patients' risk for chronic pain without use of validated tools has been questioned. The Ӧrebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (OMPQ) is used to determine risk for chronic pain.Methods: The aim of this pragmatic study was to prospectively quantify the agreement between physical therapists' assessment of patients' risk for chronic symptoms compared to the OMPQ. Patients were asked to complete the OMPQ during the initial visit. Physical therapists, blinded to OMPQ risk classification, carried out their usual patient assessment procedures. The physical therapists rated patients as either high or low risk for chronic pain based on their clinical assessment. Agreement between therapist and OMPQ was determined using Cohen's Kappa (κ) and screening accuracy compared clinician risk to the OMPQ risk classification (reference standard) by way of contingency table analysis.Results: Ninety-six (96) patients' risk classifications and 15 corresponding physical therapists' risk estimates were available for analysis. The OMPQ identified a 47% prevalence for high risk of chronic pain. Agreement (κ and 95% confidence interval) between physical therapist rating and OMPQ was slight, κ = 0.272 (0.033-0.421), p = .026. Therapists' sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) for determining risk classifications were 60.0% (44.3-74.3) and 62.8% (48.1-75.6), respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratios (95% CI) were 1.61 (1.05-2.47) and 0.64 (0.42-0.97).Discussion: The use of validated self-report questionnaires are recommended to supplement clinician prognosis for patients at risk of chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Experiences of Nonpharmacologic Providers Implementing the Oregon Back Pain Policy Expanding Services for Medicaid Recipients: A Focus Group Study

Introduction: The objective of this study was to understand the experiences of nonpharmacologic therapy (NPT) providers implementing the Oregon Back Pain Policy (OBPP). The Medicaid OBPP expanded coverage of evidence-based NPTs for back pain and simultaneously restricted access to acute and chronic opioid therapy and some interventional approaches for chronic back pain. Materials and Methods: This study uses a cross-sectional, observational design. The authors conducted three online focus groups with 44 credentialed NPT providers in February 2020. Qualitative data analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary team with an immersion/crystallization approach. Results: Four themes emerged from the data. Participants reported: (1) a lack of direct communication about the policy and mixed levels of understanding of the policy, (2) belief that expanding access to NPT and restricting opioids was beneficial for patients, (3) implementation challenges that compromised access and the perceived effectiveness of care, and (4) financial challenges in accepting Medicaid referrals, due to reimbursement and administrative burden. Conclusion: The goal of the OBPP was to increase access to evidence-based back pain care, including new coverage of NPT services and decreased opioid prescribing for back pain. This study revealed that although many NPT providers support the goals of this policy, the policy was not communicated systematically to providers and was hampered by implementation challenges.