1
|
Tomacheuski RM, Oliveira AR, Trindade PHE, Oliveira FA, Candido CP, Teixeira Neto FJ, Steagall PV, Luna SPL. Reliability and Validity of UNESP-Botucatu Cattle Pain Scale and Cow Pain Scale in Bos taurus and Bos indicus Bulls to Assess Postoperative Pain of Surgical Orchiectomy. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:ani13030364. [PMID: 36766253 PMCID: PMC9913732 DOI: 10.3390/ani13030364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain assessment guides decision-making in pain management and improves animal welfare. We aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the UNESP-Botucatu cattle pain scale (UCAPS) and the cow pain scale (CPS) for postoperative pain assessment in Bos taurus (Angus) and Bos indicus (Nelore) bulls after castration. METHODS Ten Nelore and nine Angus bulls were anaesthetised with xylazine-ketamine-diazepam-isoflurane-flunixin meglumine. Three-minute videos were recorded at -48 h, preoperative, after surgery, after rescue analgesia and at 24 h. Two evaluators assessed 95 randomised videos twice one month apart. RESULTS There were no significant differences in the pain scores between breeds. Intra and inter-rater reliability varied from good (>0.70) to very good (>0.81) for all scales. The criterion validity showed a strong correlation (0.76-0.78) between the numerical rating scale and VAS versus UCAPS and CPS, and between UCAPS and CPS (0.76). The UCAPS and CPS were responsive; all items and total scores increased after surgery. Both scales were specific (81-85%) and sensitive (82-87%). The cut-off point for rescue analgesia was >4 for UCAPS and >3 for CPS. CONCLUSIONS The UCAPS and CPS are valid and reliable to assess postoperative pain in Bos taurus and Bos indicus bulls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rubia M. Tomacheuski
- Department of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, SP, Brazil
- Correspondence: (R.M.T.); (S.P.L.L.)
| | - Alice R. Oliveira
- Department Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-681, SP, Brazil
| | - Pedro H. E. Trindade
- Department Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-681, SP, Brazil
| | - Flávia A. Oliveira
- University Veterinary Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Federal University of Northern Tocantins, Araguaína 77804-970, TO, Brazil
| | - César P. Candido
- Department of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, SP, Brazil
| | - Francisco J. Teixeira Neto
- Department of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, SP, Brazil
- Department Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-681, SP, Brazil
| | - Paulo V. Steagall
- Department of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, SP, Brazil
- Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and Centre for Companion Animal Health and Welfare, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC J2S 2M2, Canada
| | - Stelio P. L. Luna
- Department of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-687, SP, Brazil
- Department Veterinary Surgery and Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-681, SP, Brazil
- Correspondence: (R.M.T.); (S.P.L.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Slade Oliveira C, Varella Serapião R, Dos Reis Camargo AJ, de Freitas C, Tamy Iguma L, Campos Carvalho B, de Almeida Camargo LS, Zoccolaro Oliveira L, da Silva Verneque R. Oocyte origin affects the in vitro embryo production and development of Holstein (Bos taurus taurus) - Gyr (Bos taurus indicus) reciprocal cross embryos. Anim Reprod Sci 2019; 209:106165. [PMID: 31514926 DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
A reciprocal crossbred embryo production approach was used to assess effects of maternal breed on embryo development in tropical conditions (average temperature 22.0 °C and 77.9% relative humidity). Oocytes were recovered by ovum pick-up (OPU) from Gyr and Holstein donors (n = 90 Holstein and 83 Gyr OPUs). Female F1 embryos were produced by fertilization with sperm bearing X-chromosomes from Holstein semen (n = 615 Gyr oocytes) or Gyr semen (n = 255 Holstein oocytes). Blastocysts were transferred to recipients 168 h post-insemination (h.p.i.) (n = 70-144) and there were assessments of pregnancies until birth. Oocyte number per OPU (Gyr 10.0 ± 0.7 compared with Holstein 6.3 ± 0.4) and percentage viable oocytes (Gyr 78.8 ± 1.9% compared with Holstein 71.2 ± 2.2%) were less for Holstein donor animals. There was a 2.8 fold fewer total number of F1 blastocysts when Holstein donors were used (Gyr: 260, Holstein: 91). Pregnancy assessment during the different stages of gestation indicated the percentage pregnancy was less when embryos were produced from Holstein oocytes (Gyr and Holstein respectively: early pregnancy, 47.9% compared with 38.6%; mid-pregnancy, 44.4% compared with 31.4%; late pregnancy, 41.0% compared with 22.9%). Pregnancy length was also affected by maternal breed (Gyr: 280.8 ± 0.6, Holstein: 286.3 ± 0.7). It is concluded that in a tropical environment the maternal breed affects crossbred embryo development with pregnancy rates during the latter stages of gestation being greater when Gyr oocytes are used for production of embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Slade Oliveira
- Animal Reproduction Laboratory, Santa Monica Experimental Station, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, Fazenda Santa Monica Road, Barao de Juparana, Valença, RJ, Brazil.
| | - Raquel Varella Serapião
- Animal Biology Laboratory, Agriculture Research Company of the Rio de Janeiro State (PESAGRO RIO), Sao Boa Ventura Ave, 770, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
| | - Agostinho Jorge Dos Reis Camargo
- Animal Biology Laboratory, Agriculture Research Company of the Rio de Janeiro State (PESAGRO RIO), Sao Boa Ventura Ave, 770, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
| | - Celio de Freitas
- Animal Reproduction Laboratory, Santa Monica Experimental Station, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, Fazenda Santa Monica Road, Barao de Juparana, Valença, RJ, Brazil
| | - Lilian Tamy Iguma
- Animal Reproduction Laboratory, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil
| | | | | | - Letícia Zoccolaro Oliveira
- Department of Veterinary Clinic and Surgery, Veterinary School, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burns BM, Hiendleder S, Laing AR, Fordyce G, Herring AD. Ultrasonographic measurements in first trimester concepti identify predictors of birth weight and postnatal development in cattle. J Anim Sci 2018; 96:4186-4194. [PMID: 30184108 DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The placenta is a major driver of prenatal growth and involved in programming of postnatal performance. We therefore determined placental and embryo-fetal ultrasonographic parameters in early pregnancy and their relationships with birth weight and postnatal weights in a Bos indicus-Bos taurus composite beef cattle population. Pregnancies were generated in 2-yr-old Droughtmaster heifers by artificial insemination after estrus synchronization in 2 consecutive years (2009, n = 36 and 2010, n = 57), with a subset of 2010 heifers used again as lactating 3-yr-old cows in 2011 (n = 24). Each cohort was managed as 1 contemporary group for measurements of Corpus luteum diameter, amnion length and width, placentome width and thickness, and embryo-fetal crown-rump length, at 7 and 8 wk of gestation. This was followed by recordings of birth weight, branding weight at 5 to 6 mo of age and weaning weight 2 mo later. At a significance threshold of P < 0.05, placentome thickness at week 7 was negatively correlated with weights at birth (r = -0.23), branding (r = -0.25), and weaning (r = -0.35), whereas placentome width at week 7 (r = 0.24) and thickness at week 8 (r = 0.29) were positively correlated with birth weight. Thicker placentomes in males at week 7 (7%) difference mirrored sex differences in weights at birth (7%), branding (10%), and weaning (6%). The sex difference trend for birth weight was not consistent across sire-year combinations, ranging from -3.2 to +4.7 kg (birth weight of males - females per sire). These results support the hypothesis that placental parameters at the transition from embryo to fetal stage are major predictors of fetal and postnatal growth, albeit with significant environmentally induced plasticity, in stabilized B. indicus-B. taurus composite populations, and suggest that elements of B. indicus-B. taurus reciprocal differences in birth weight persist in composite populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Burns
- Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
| | - Stefan Hiendleder
- Robinson Research Institute, North Adelaide, SA, Australia.,JS Davies Epigenetics and Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia
| | - Alan R Laing
- Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ayr, Qld, Australia
| | - Geoffry Fordyce
- Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
| | - Andy D Herring
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sinclair KD, Rutherford KMD, Wallace JM, Brameld JM, Stöger R, Alberio R, Sweetman D, Gardner DS, Perry VEA, Adam CL, Ashworth CJ, Robinson JE, Dwyer CM. Epigenetics and developmental programming of welfare and production traits in farm animals. Reprod Fertil Dev 2016; 28:RD16102. [PMID: 27439952 DOI: 10.1071/rd16102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 06/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The concept that postnatal health and development can be influenced by events that occur in utero originated from epidemiological studies in humans supported by numerous mechanistic (including epigenetic) studies in a variety of model species. Referred to as the 'developmental origins of health and disease' or 'DOHaD' hypothesis, the primary focus of large-animal studies until quite recently had been biomedical. Attention has since turned towards traits of commercial importance in farm animals. Herein we review the evidence that prenatal risk factors, including suboptimal parental nutrition, gestational stress, exposure to environmental chemicals and advanced breeding technologies, can determine traits such as postnatal growth, feed efficiency, milk yield, carcass composition, animal welfare and reproductive potential. We consider the role of epigenetic and cytoplasmic mechanisms of inheritance, and discuss implications for livestock production and future research endeavours. We conclude that although the concept is proven for several traits, issues relating to effect size, and hence commercial importance, remain. Studies have also invariably been conducted under controlled experimental conditions, frequently assessing single risk factors, thereby limiting their translational value for livestock production. We propose concerted international research efforts that consider multiple, concurrent stressors to better represent effects of contemporary animal production systems.
Collapse
|
5
|
Dillon JA, Riley DG, Herring AD, Sanders JO, Thallman RM. Genetic effects on birth weight in reciprocal Brahman–Simmental crossbred calves1. J Anim Sci 2015; 93:553-61. [DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|
6
|
Xiang R, Ghanipoor-Samami M, Johns WH, Eindorf T, Rutley DL, Kruk ZA, Fitzsimmons CJ, Thomsen DA, Roberts CT, Burns BM, Anderson GI, Greenwood PL, Hiendleder S. Maternal and paternal genomes differentially affect myofibre characteristics and muscle weights of bovine fetuses at midgestation. PLoS One 2013; 8:e53402. [PMID: 23341941 PMCID: PMC3544898 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2012] [Accepted: 11/30/2012] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Postnatal myofibre characteristics and muscle mass are largely determined during fetal development and may be significantly affected by epigenetic parent-of-origin effects. However, data on such effects in prenatal muscle development that could help understand unexplained variation in postnatal muscle traits are lacking. In a bovine model we studied effects of distinct maternal and paternal genomes, fetal sex, and non-genetic maternal effects on fetal myofibre characteristics and muscle mass. Data from 73 fetuses (Day153, 54% term) of four genetic groups with purebred and reciprocal cross Angus and Brahman genetics were analyzed using general linear models. Parental genomes explained the greatest proportion of variation in myofibre size of Musculus semitendinosus (80–96%) and in absolute and relative weights of M. supraspinatus, M. longissimus dorsi, M. quadriceps femoris and M. semimembranosus (82–89% and 56–93%, respectively). Paternal genome in interaction with maternal genome (P<0.05) explained most genetic variation in cross sectional area (CSA) of fast myotubes (68%), while maternal genome alone explained most genetic variation in CSA of fast myofibres (93%, P<0.01). Furthermore, maternal genome independently (M. semimembranosus, 88%, P<0.0001) or in combination (M. supraspinatus, 82%; M. longissimus dorsi, 93%; M. quadriceps femoris, 86%) with nested maternal weight effect (5–6%, P<0.05), was the predominant source of variation for absolute muscle weights. Effects of paternal genome on muscle mass decreased from thoracic to pelvic limb and accounted for all (M. supraspinatus, 97%, P<0.0001) or most (M. longissimus dorsi, 69%, P<0.0001; M. quadriceps femoris, 54%, P<0.001) genetic variation in relative weights. An interaction between maternal and paternal genomes (P<0.01) and effects of maternal weight (P<0.05) on expression of H19, a master regulator of an imprinted gene network, and negative correlations between H19 expression and fetal muscle mass (P<0.001), suggested imprinted genes and miRNA interference as mechanisms for differential effects of maternal and paternal genomes on fetal muscle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruidong Xiang
- J.S. Davies Non-Mendelian Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mani Ghanipoor-Samami
- J.S. Davies Non-Mendelian Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William H. Johns
- NSW Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre, Trevenna Rd, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tanja Eindorf
- J.S. Davies Non-Mendelian Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - David L. Rutley
- J.S. Davies Non-Mendelian Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Zbigniew A. Kruk
- J.S. Davies Non-Mendelian Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Carolyn J. Fitzsimmons
- J.S. Davies Non-Mendelian Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dana A. Thomsen
- J.S. Davies Non-Mendelian Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Claire T. Roberts
- Robinson Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Brian M. Burns
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Animal Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, Rockhampton, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gail I. Anderson
- J.S. Davies Non-Mendelian Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Paul L. Greenwood
- NSW Department of Primary Industries, Beef Industry Centre, Trevenna Rd, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stefan Hiendleder
- J.S. Davies Non-Mendelian Genetics Group, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Robinson Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Imumorin IG, Kim EH, Lee YM, De Koning DJ, van Arendonk JA, De Donato M, Taylor JF, Kim JJ. Genome Scan for Parent-of-Origin QTL Effects on Bovine Growth and Carcass Traits. Front Genet 2011; 2:44. [PMID: 22303340 PMCID: PMC3268597 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2011.00044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2011] [Accepted: 06/25/2011] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Parent-of-origin effects (POE) such as genomic imprinting influence growth and body composition in livestock, rodents, and humans. Here, we report the results of a genome scan to detect quantitative trait loci (QTL) with POE on growth and carcass traits in Angus × Brahman cattle crossbreds. We identified 24 POE–QTL on 15 Bos taurus autosomes (BTAs) of which six were significant at 5% genome-wide (GW) level and 18 at the 5% chromosome-wide (CW) significance level. Six QTL were paternally expressed while 15 were maternally expressed. Three QTL influencing post-weaning growth map to the proximal end of BTA2 (linkage region of 0–9 cM; genomic region of 5.0–10.8 Mb), for which only one imprinted ortholog is known so far in the human and mouse genomes, and therefore may potentially represent a novel imprinted region. The detected QTL individually explained 1.4 ∼ 5.1% of each trait’s phenotypic variance. Comparative in silico analysis of bovine genomic locations show that 32 out of 1,442 known mammalian imprinted genes from human and mouse homologs map to the identified QTL regions. Although several of the 32 genes have been associated with quantitative traits in cattle, only two (GNAS and PEG3) have experimental proof of being imprinted in cattle. These results lend additional support to recent reports that POE on quantitative traits in mammals may be more common than previously thought, and strengthen the need to identify and experimentally validate cattle orthologs of imprinted genes so as to investigate their effects on quantitative traits.
Collapse
|
8
|
Review: Preweaning, Postweaning, and Carcass Trait Comparisons for Progeny Sired by Subtropically Adapted Beef Sire Breeds at Various US Locations123. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010. [DOI: 10.15232/s1080-7446(15)30633-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
9
|
Bennett GL. Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. I. Changes in estimated breeding values1,2. J Anim Sci 2008; 86:2093-102. [DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
10
|
Amen TS, Herring AD, Sanders JO, Gill CA. Evaluation of reciprocal differences in Bos indicus × Bos taurus backcross calves produced through embryo transfer: II. Postweaning, carcass, and meat traits1. J Anim Sci 2007; 85:373-9. [PMID: 17235022 DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Angus (A) x Bos indicus (B; Brahman or Nellore) reciprocal backcross, embryo transfer calves belonging to 28 full-sib families were evaluated for differences in feedyard initial BW, feedyard final BW, carcass weight, LM area, adjusted fat thickness, intramuscular fat, and Warner-Bratzler shear force. Two methods of analysis were investigated; method I made no distinction between how the F(1) parents were produced, whereas method II distinguished the 2 types of F(1) parents (AB vs. BA, corresponding to A x B vs. B x A, respectively). No significant reciprocal differences for these weight and carcass traits were detected under method I analyses, although the same trend existed for subsequent BW rankings as for birth weight and weaning weight. For each weight phase, the cross that involved a larger proportion of B in the sire in relation to the amount in the dam (F(1) x A and B x F(1)) ranked heavier than the respective reciprocal cross (A x F(1) and F(1) x B). As a whole, A backcross calves had larger (P < 0.001) LM area, more (P < 0.001) marbling, and lower (P < 0.001) Warner-Bratzler shear force than B back-cross calves, but no consistent trends were detected between reciprocal crosses for any of these traits, in contrast with the trends observed for the weight traits. Furthermore, males were heavier than females entering (P < 0.001) and leaving (P < 0.001) the feedyard, produced a heavier carcass (P < 0.001), and had larger LM area (P < 0.05) with less adjusted fat (P < 0.001). No difference existed between the sexes for Warner-Bratzler shear force or marbling. No interactions involving sex, sire type, and dam type were observed for any of these traits. The results were similar under methods I and II analyses, with the exception that a significant sire type x dam type interaction was observed for initial feedyard BW. Results from this study suggest that for weight-related traits, both the breed constitution of the embryo transfer calf and the cross that produces the calf play an important role in its ultimate performance for B crossbred calves. For body composition and meat-related traits, it appears that the breed makeup of the embryo transfer calf itself is more important to animal performance than the specific cross used to produce the calf.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T S Amen
- Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|