1
|
Munk P, Yang D, Röder T, Maier L, Petersen TN, Duarte ASR, Clausen PTLC, Brinch C, Van Gompel L, Luiken R, Wagenaar JA, Schmitt H, Heederik DJJ, Mevius DJ, Smit LAM, Bossers A, Aarestrup FM. The European livestock resistome. mSystems 2024; 9:e0132823. [PMID: 38501800 PMCID: PMC11019871 DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01328-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Metagenomic sequencing has proven to be a powerful tool in the monitoring of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Here, we provide a comparative analysis of the resistome from pigs, poultry, veal calves, turkey, and rainbow trout, for a total of 538 herds across nine European countries. We calculated the effects of per-farm management practices and antimicrobial usage (AMU) on the resistome in pigs, broilers, and veal calves. We also provide an in-depth study of the associations between bacterial diversity, resistome diversity, and AMR abundances as well as co-occurrence analysis of bacterial taxa and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and the universality of the latter. The resistomes of veal calves and pigs clustered together, as did those of avian origin, while the rainbow trout resistome was different. Moreover, we identified clear core resistomes for each specific food-producing animal species. We identified positive associations between bacterial alpha diversity and both resistome alpha diversity and abundance. Network analyses revealed very few taxa-ARG associations in pigs but a large number for the avian species. Using updated reference databases and optimized bioinformatics, previously reported significant associations between AMU, biosecurity, and AMR in pig and poultry farms were validated. AMU is an important driver for AMR; however, our integrated analyses suggest that factors contributing to increased bacterial diversity might also be associated with higher AMR load. We also found that dispersal limitations of ARGs are shaping livestock resistomes, and future efforts to fight AMR should continue to emphasize biosecurity measures.IMPORTANCEUnderstanding the occurrence, diversity, and drivers for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is important to focus future control efforts. So far, almost all attempts to limit AMR in livestock have addressed antimicrobial consumption. We here performed an integrated analysis of the resistomes of five important farmed animal populations across Europe finding that the resistome and AMR levels are also shaped by factors related to bacterial diversity, as well as dispersal limitations. Thus, future studies and interventions aimed at reducing AMR should not only address antimicrobial usage but also consider other epidemiological and ecological factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Munk
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Dongsheng Yang
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
| | - Timo Röder
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Leonie Maier
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Christian Brinch
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Liese Van Gompel
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
| | - Roosmarijn Luiken
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
| | - Jaap A. Wagenaar
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
| | - Heike Schmitt
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
| | - Dick J. J. Heederik
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
| | - Dik J. Mevius
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
- Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands
| | - Lidwien A. M. Smit
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
| | - EFFORT ConsortiumGravelandHaitskeGonzalez-ZornBrunoMoyanoGabrielSandersPascalChauvinClaireBattistiAntonioDewulfJeroenWadepohlKatharinaWasylDariuszSkarzyńskaMagdalenaZajacMagdalenaPękala-SafińskaAgnieszkaDaskalovHristoStärkKatharina D. C.
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Max Born Crescent, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
- Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands
| | - Alex Bossers
- Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Utrecht
- Wageningen Bioveterinary Research, Wageningen University & Research, Lelystad, The Netherlands
| | - Frank M. Aarestrup
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|