Perinatal outcome in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer in ART cycles

Untangling the independent effect of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and ART-related factors on maternal, placental, fetal, and neonatal adverse outcomes: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Women with endometriosis may constitute a group at a particularly increased risk of pregnancy-related complications. Furthermore, women selected for assisted reproductive technology (ART) are exposed to additional endocrinological and embryological factors that have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This study aimed to investigate the independent effect of endometriosis, adenomyosis, and various ART-related factors on adverse maternal, placental, fetal, and neonatal outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

Published randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies were considered eligible. PubMed, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched up to 1 March 2024. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in line with the PRISMA and the MOOSE reporting guidelines. To thoroughly investigate the association between endometriosis/adenomyosis and adverse pregnancy outcomes, sub-analyses were conducted, whenever possible, according to: the method of conception (i.e. ART and non-ART conception), the endometriosis stage/phenotype, the coexistence of endometriosis and adenomyosis, any pre-pregnancy surgical treatment of endometriosis, and the form of adenomyosis. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI was used as effect measure. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach.

OUTCOMES

We showed a higher risk of placenta previa in women with endometriosis compared to controls (34 studies, OR 2.84; 95% CI: 2.47, 3.26; I2 = 83%, moderate quality). The association was observed regardless of the method of conception and was particularly strong in the most severe forms of endometriosis (i.e. rASRM stage III-IV endometriosis and deep endometriosis (DE)) (OR 6.61; 95% CI: 2.08, 20.98; I2 = 66% and OR 14.54; 95% CI: 3.67, 57.67; I2 = 54%, respectively). We also showed an association, regardless of the method of conception, between endometriosis and: (i) preterm birth (PTB) (43 studies, OR 1.43; 95% CI: 1.32, 1.56; I2 = 89%, low quality) and (ii) cesarean section (29 studies, OR 1.52; 95% CI: 1.41, 1.63; I2 = 93%, low quality). The most severe forms of endometriosis were strongly associated with PTB. Two outcomes were associated with adenomyosis both in the main analysis and in the sub-analysis that included only ART pregnancies: (i) miscarriage (14 studies, OR 1.83; 95% CI: 1.53, 2.18; I2 = 72%, low quality) and (ii) pre-eclampsia (7 studies, OR 1.70; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.48; I2 = 77%, low quality). Regarding ART-related factors, the following associations were observed in the main analysis and confirmed in all sub-analyses conducted by pooling only risk estimates adjusted for covariates: (i) blastocyst stage embryo transfer (ET) and monozygotic twinning (28 studies, OR 2.05; 95% CI, 1.72, 2.45; I2 = 72%, low quality), (ii) frozen embryo transfer (FET) and (reduced risk of) small for gestational age (21 studies, OR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.57, 0.61; P < 0.00001; I2 = 17%, very low quality) and (increased risk of) large for gestational age (16 studies, OR 1.70; 95% CI, 1.60, 1.80; P < 0.00001; I2 = 55%, very low quality), (iii) artificial cycle (AC)-FET and pre-eclampsia (12 studies, OR 2.14; 95% CI: 1.91-2.39; I2 = 9%, low quality), PTB (21 studies, OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.15, 1.34; P < 0.0001; I2 = 50%, low quality), cesarean section (15 studies, OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.49, 1.70; P < 0.00001; I2 = 67%, very low quality) and post-partum hemorrhage (6 studies, OR 2.43; 95% CI 2.11, 2.81; P < 0.00001; I2 = 15%, very low quality).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Severe endometriosis (i.e. rASRM stage III-IV endometriosis, DE) constitutes a considerable risk factor for placenta previa and PTB. Herein, we recommend against superimposing on this condition other exposure factors that have a strong association with the same obstetric adverse outcome or with different outcomes which, if coexisting, could determine the onset of an ominous obstetric syndrome. Specifically, we strongly discourage the use of AC regimens for FET in ovulatory women with rASRM stage III-IV endometriosis or DE. We also recommend single ET at the blastocyst stage in this high-risk population.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023401428.

Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Transfer in In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neonatal Outcomes

Background and Objectives: Although considerable research has been devoted to examining the distinctions between fresh and frozen embryo transfer regarding obstetric outcomes and rates of pregnancy success, there is still a scarcity of thorough analyses that specifically examine neonatal outcomes. The objective of our study was to provide an in-depth analysis of neonatal outcomes that occur after the transfer of fresh and frozen embryos (ET vs. FET) in IVF/ICSI cycles. Materials and Methods: Multiple databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wiley, Scopus, Ovid and Science Direct) were searched from January 1980 to February 2024. Two reviewers conducted the article identification and data extraction, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) or the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Results: Twenty studies, including 171,481 participants in total, were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses. A significant increase in preterm birth rates was noted with fresh embryo transfer compared to FET in the overall IVF/ICSI population (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.18-1.35, p < 0.00001), as well as greater odds of a low birth weight (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27-1.48, p < 0.00001) and small-for-gestational-age infants in this group (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.63-2.00, p < 0.00001). In contrast, frozen embryo transfer can result in macrosomic (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, p < 0.00001) or large-for-gestational-age infants (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.69, p < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed regarding congenital malformations or neonatal death rates. Conclusions: This systematic review confirmed that singleton babies conceived by frozen embryo transfer are at lower risk of preterm delivery, low birthweight and being small for gestational age than their counterparts conceived by fresh embryo transfer. The data support embryo cryopreservation but suggest that elective freezing should be limited to cases with a proven indication or within the framework of a clinical study.

Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes of in vitro Fertilization Twins after Fresh Embryo Transfer versus Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer

OBJECTIVES

The limited data regarding obstetrical outcomes in multiple pregnancies following both fresh embryo transfer and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), along with the association between multiple pregnancies and increased pregnancy complications compared to singleton pregnancies, highlight the need for research on this topic. Therefore, this study aimed to compare obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies after fresh embryo transfer versus FET.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective single-center study.

PARTICIPANTS

There were in vitro fertilization (IVF) dichorionic twin pregnancies ≥23 weeks of gestation during 2010-2022.

SETTING

This retrospective study was based on data recorded at Galilee Medical Center, a tertiary-care university-affiliated hospital, Israel.

METHODS

We conducted a comparative analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between IVF dichorionic twin pregnancies after fresh embryo transfer and those after FET. This analysis included variables such as gestational age at delivery, birthweight, preterm birth rates, low birthweight rates, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and complications related to prematurity.

RESULTS

The study included 389 IVF twin pregnancies: 253 after fresh embryo transfer and 136 after FET. Following fresh embryo transfer compared to FET, the mean gestational age at delivery was earlier (34 + 6 vs. 35 + 5 weeks, p = 0.001) and the rate of preterm birth (<37 weeks) was higher (70.4% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.001). This difference in gestational age at delivery remained significant after adjustment for maternal age, parity, and BMI (OR = 2.11, 95% CI: 2.11-3.27, p = 0.001). Similarly, the difference in preterm birth rates remained significant after adjustment of the same variables (p = 0.001). For the fresh embryo transfer compared to the FET group, the mean birthweight was lower (2,179.72 vs. 2,353.35 g, p = 0.003); and low birthweight and very low birthweight rates were higher (71.2% vs. 56.3%, p < 0.001 and 13.5% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.004, respectively). For the fresh embryo transfer compared to the FET group, the proportions were higher of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (23.3% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.019), of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (10.5% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.045) and those needing phototherapy (23.3% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.019).

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of the study include its retrospective nature. Furthermore, we were unable to adjust for some confounders, such as the number of eggs retrieved, the number of embryos transferred, and methods for ovarian stimulation or preparation of the endometrium for embryo transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies were worse after fresh embryo transfer than after FET. The findings support favorable fetal outcomes after FET and support the current trend of shifting from fresh embryo transfer to FET. Prospective studies are needed to support our results.

The effect of endometrial thickness and pattern on the success of frozen embryo transfer cycles and gestational age accuracy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between endometrial thickness measured before embryo transfer, and pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of all consecutive FET cycles, from January 2012 to August 2018. Based on ROC analysis for endometrial thickness, we found 8 mm was a reliable cutoff point to predict pregnancy prior to embryo transfer. Accordingly, the cycles were divided into Group A: cycles with endometrial thickness ≤ 8 mm and Group B: > 8 mm.

RESULTS

Group A included 485 FET cycles and group B included 626 cycles. Compared with group A, Group B had significantly higher chemical and clinical pregnancy rates (30.3 vs. 24.6%; p = .046, and 24.0 vs. 18.6%; p = .036), respectively. In multivariate analysis, endometrial thickness and the protocols used were the only parameters influencing the chance to achieve pregnancy, with odds ratio 1.54 (95%CI 1.07-2.22, p = .019) for the endometrium and odds ratio 1.95 (95%CI 1.31-2.9; p = .001) to the protocol used. Endometrial thickness might predict crown-rump length (CRL) discordancy with odds ratio 4.61 (p = .001; 95% CI 1.42-14.92). Compared with group B, Group A had more cases of overt discordancy (13.3 vs. 4%; p = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing FET cycles, endometrial thickness and treatment protocol may predict the chemical and clinical pregnancy rates, as well as CRL discordancy.

SUMMARY

Endometrial thickness and preparation improved pregnancy rate in FET cycles and significantly greater crown-rump length discordancy was observed with thinner endometria.

Perinatal and obstetric outcomes in singleton pregnancies following fresh versus cryopreserved blastocyst transfer: a meta-analysis

The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts is increasing in IVF centres. However, little is known about the perinatal and obstetric outcomes of this procedure. In an attempt to further elucidate these issues, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare cryopreserved transfer with fresh blastocyst embryo transfer. The results show that the risk of both preterm (odds ratio [OR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80-0.99, P = 0.04) and low birthweight births (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68-0.99, P = 0.04) was significantly lower after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer than after fresh blastocyst transfer. The rate of large for gestational age births was significantly higher (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.55-1.82, P < 0.00001) and the rate of small for gestational age births significantly lower (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, P < 0.00001) after cryopreserved blastocyst transfer. The transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts was associated with a significantly lower risk of placental abruption (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.83, P = 0.003) but a significantly higher risk of Caesarean section (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.43, P = 0.03). In conclusion, the perinatal and obstetric outcomes associated with the transfer of cryopreserved blastocysts differ from those associated with fresh blastocyst transfer.

Perinatal and maternal outcome after vitrification of blastocysts: a Nordic study in singletons from the CoNARTaS group

STUDY QUESTION

Is transfer of vitrified blastocysts associated with higher perinatal and maternal risks compared with slow-frozen cleavage stage embryos and fresh blastocysts?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Transfer of vitrified blastocysts is associated with a higher risk of preterm birth (PTB) when compared with slow-frozen cleavage stage embryos and with a higher risk of a large baby, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDPs) and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) but a lower risk of placenta previa when compared with fresh blastocysts.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Transfer of frozen-thawed embryos (FETs) plays a central role in modern fertility treatment, limiting the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancies. Following FET, several studies report a lower risk of PTB, low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) yet a higher risk of fetal macrosomia and large for gestational age (LGA) compared with fresh embryos. In recent years, the introduction of new freezing techniques has increased treatment success. The slow-freeze technique combined with cleavage stage transfer has been replaced by vitrification and blastocyst transfer. Only few studies have compared perinatal and maternal outcomes after vitrification and slow-freeze and mainly in cleavage stage embryos, with most studies indicating similar outcomes in the two groups. Studies on perinatal and maternal outcomes following vitrified blastocysts are limited.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This registry-based cohort study includes singletons born after frozen-thawed and fresh transfers following the introduction of vitrification in Sweden and Denmark, in 2002 and 2009, respectively. The study includes 3650 children born after transfer of vitrified blastocysts, 8123 children born after transfer of slow-frozen cleavage stage embryos and 4469 children born after transfer of fresh blastocysts during 2002-2015. Perinatal and maternal outcomes in singletons born after vitrified blastocyst transfer were compared with singletons born after slow-frozen cleavage stage transfer and singletons born after fresh blastocyst transfer. Main outcomes included PTB, LBW, macrosomia, HDP and placenta previa.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data were obtained from the CoNARTaS (Committee of Nordic ART and Safety) group. Based on national registries in Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway, the CoNARTaS cohort includes all children born after ART treatment in public and private clinics 1984-2015. Outcomes were assessed with logistic multivariable regression analysis, adjusting for the country and year of birth, maternal age, body mass index, parity, smoking, parental educational level, fertilisation method (IVF/ICSI), single embryo transfer, number of gestational sacs and the child's sex.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A higher risk of PTB (<37 weeks) was noted in the vitrified blastocyst group compared with the slow-frozen cleavage stage group (adjusted odds ratio, aOR [95% CI], 1.33 [1.09-1.62]). No significant differences were observed for LBW (<2500 g), SGA, macrosomia (≥4500 g) and LGA when comparing the vitrified blastocyst with the slow-frozen cleavage stage group. For maternal outcomes, no significant difference was seen in the risk of HDP, placenta previa, placental abruption and PPH in the vitrified blastocyst versus the slow frozen cleavage stage group, although the precision was limited.When comparing vitrified and fresh blastocysts, we found higher risks of macrosomia (≥4500 g) aOR 1.77 [1.35-2.31] and LGA aOR 1.48 [1.18-1.84]. Further, the risks of HDP aOR 1.47 [1.19-1.81] and PPH aOR 1.68 [1.39-2.03] were higher in singletons born after vitrified compared with fresh blastocyst transfer while the risks of SGA aOR 0.58 [0.44-0.78] and placenta previa aOR 0.35 [0.25-0.48] were lower.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Since vitrification was introduced simultaneously with blastocyst transfer in Sweden and Denmark, it was not possible to explore the effect of vitrification per se in this study.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The results from the change of strategy to vitrification of blastocysts are reassuring, indicating that the freezing technique per se has no major influence on the perinatal and maternal outcomes. The higher risk of PTB may be related to the extended embryo culture rather than vitrification.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study is part of the ReproUnion Collaborative study, co-financed by the European Union, Interreg V ÖKS. The study was also financed by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF agreement (LUA/ALF 70940), Hjalmar Svensson Research Foundation and NordForsk (project 71 450). There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN11780826.

Expression of miR-Let-7a, miR-15a, miR-16-1, and their target genes in fresh and vitrified embryos and its surrounding culture media for noninvasive embryo assessment

microRNAs (miRNAs) play a critical role in implantation and development of mouse embryos. In this study, we aim to evaluate the possibility of miRNAs as potential biomarkers in the blastocyst culture to assess embryo quality. We also intend to investigate whether improved clinical outcomes of vitrified embryos agree with altered miRNA expressions. Mouse embryos from in vitro fertilization were vitrified at the two-cell stage. After thawing, the embryos were individually cultured and developed to the blastocyst stage. We used quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to evaluate miRNA expression levels in both vitrified and fresh groups, and culture medium (CM). The fibronectin binding assay was performed to examine for blastocyst attachment. The findings showed reduced expressions of miR-16-1 (0.2 ± 0.06) and miR-Let-7a (0.65 ± 0.1) after vitrification compared to fresh embryos. We observed significant upregulation of the target genes Vav3 (4.33 ± 0.25), integrin β-3 (Itg β3; 4.73 ± 0.2), and Bcl2 (2.29 ± 0.16) in the vitrified embryos compared to the fresh groups. Evaluation of blastocyst CM showed upregulation of miR-Let-7a (15.68 ± 0.89), miR-16-1 (16.18 ± 0.75), and miR-15a (13.36 ± 0.73) in the vitrified group in comparison to the fresh blastocysts (P < .05). The expression levels of miR-16-1 (3.28 ± 0.63), miR-15a (5.91 ± 0.38), and miR-Let-7a (9.07 ± 0.6) in CM of the vitrified blastocysts conducted on fibronectin were significantly higher than the fresh group (P < .05).This study showed that vitrification of embryos changes implantation and proliferation biomarkers. In addition, upregulated miRNAs in CM could be potentially used for noninvasive early assessment of embryo quality.

Clinical outcomes after transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen-thawed cleavage embryos: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes after fresh transfer of blastocysts cultured from vitrified-thawed cleavage embryos (VTCE) compared with conventional frozen-thawed blastocysts transfer (FBT), or with the usual fresh blastocysts transfer (FRBT).

METHODS

A total of 155 cycles undergoing fresh transfer of VTCE blastocysts, 4904 cycles undergoing FBT, and 1014 cycles undergoing FRBT were retrospectively analyzed from August 2014 to July 2017. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

VTCE blastocysts' transfer resulted in a lower risk of early miscarriage (8.82% versus 19.70%, P < 0.05) and a decreased fetal birth weight (2611.90 ± 618.65 g versus 2931.86 ± 546.52 g, P < 0.01) compared to FBT. No significant difference was found regarding live birth rate, gestational age, and cesarean section. Correspondingly, VTCE blastocysts' transfer led to significantly compromised pregnancy outcomes regarding clinical pregnancy rate and implantation, and even a slightly compromised live birth rate when compared with FRBT. Moreover, a higher occurrence of cesarean Section (88.89% versus 71.29%, P < 0.05) and a shorter gestational age (262.04 ± 14.99 days versus 268.06 ± 14.07, P < 0.05) were also found. Nevertheless, the risk of small for gestational age and large for gestational age, and the neonatal birth weight were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

VTCE blastocysts' transfer results in a comprehensively moderate outcome, which is an acceptable option for patients. Our results can provide efficient value for patients' counseling. Furthermore, these findings indicate directions for exploring the mechanisms of low birth weight and short gestational age.

Effect of pretreatment with combined oral contraceptives on outcomes of assisted reproductive technology for women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of pretreatment with combined oral contraceptives (COC) on outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who underwent assisted reproductive technology for subfertility.

METHODS

Two authors independently searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochran Library to identify and review articles published from October 1995 until December 2018 according to selection criteria. Outcomes are expressed as mean difference and odds ratio (OR) in a meta-analysis model.

RESULTS

A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis: one randomized controlled study and two prospective and four retrospective cohort studies. Meta-analysis showed that the COC pretreatment did not affect rate of clinical pregnancy (OR = 0.93, 95% confidence interval CI 0.65-1.34, I² = 76%) or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.57-1.44, I² = 0%). However, the rate of miscarriage in the COC group was significantly higher (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.02-1.72, I² = 9%) and the rate of cumulative live birth was significantly lower compared with the control group (OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.98, I² = 55%). Subgroup analysis showed higher rates of miscarriage and lower rates of cumulative live birth in studies with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.17-2.44, I² = 0% and OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.29-0.50, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with COC in women with PCOS before assisted reproductive technology may have an adverse effect on clinical outcomes, especially with a GnRH antagonist protocol.

Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?

BACKGROUND

Initial observational studies and a systematic review published 5 years ago have suggested that obstetric and perinatal outcomes are better in offspring conceived following frozen rather than fresh embryo transfers, with reduced risks of preterm birth, small for gestational age, low birth weight and pre-eclampsia. More recent primary studies are beginning to challenge some of these findings. We therefore conducted an updated systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis to examine if these results have remained consistent over time.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis (trend with time) of obstetric and perinatal complications in singleton pregnancies following the transfer of frozen thawed and fresh embryos generated through in-vitro fertilisation.

SEARCH METHODS

Data Sources from Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials DARE and CINAHL (1984-2016) were searched using appropriate key words. Observational and randomised studies comparing obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies conceived through IVF using either fresh or frozen thawed embryos. Two independent reviewers extracted data in 2 × 2 tables and assessed the methodological quality of the relevant studies using CASP scoring. Both aggregated as well as cumulative meta-analysis was done using STATA.

OUTCOMES

Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Singleton babies conceived from frozen thawed embryos were at lower relative risk (RR) of preterm delivery (0.90; 95% CI 0.84-0.97) low birth weight (0.72; 95% CI 0.67-0.77) and small for gestational age (0.61; 95% CI 0.56-0.67) compared to those conceived from fresh embryo transfers, but faced an increased risk (RR) of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (1.29; 95% CI 1.07-1.56) large for gestational age (1.54; 95% CI 1.48-1.61) and high birth weight (1.85; 95% CI 1.46-2.33). There was no difference in the risk of congenital anomalies and perinatal mortality between the two groups. The direction and magnitude of effect for these outcomes have remained virtually unchanged over time while the degree of precision has improved with the addition of data from newer studies.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The results of this cumulative meta-analysis confirm that the decreased risks of small for gestational age, low birth weight and preterm delivery and increased risks of large for gestational age and high birth weight associated with pregnancies conceived from frozen embryos have been consistent in terms of direction and magnitude of effect over several years, with increasing precision around the point estimates. Replication in a number of different populations has provided external validity for the results, for outcomes of birth weight and preterm delivery. Meanwhile, caution should be exercised about embarking on a policy of electively freezing all embryos in IVF as there are increased risks for large for gestational age babies and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Therefore, elective freezing should ideally be undertaken in specific cases such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, fertility preservation or in the context of randomised trials.

A universal freeze all strategy: why it is not warranted

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

There's some preclinical evidence of an adverse effect of multifollicular growth on endometrial function in assisted reproductive technology cycles. Universal elective frozen embryo transfer (eFET) in an unstimulated cycle is being promoted as a panacea, regardless of patient, and cycle characteristics. We review the clinical evidence on the effectiveness and safety of eFETs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fresh and eFET yield contradictory results in terms of live birth rates. RCTs mainly involve women with an excessive response to ovarian stimulation. Studies including women with a normal or low ovarian response are either patient/physician preference or retrospective studies, prone to bias. Yet, they yield contradictory results as well. Overall, eFET seems to have limited potential to improve effectiveness of assisted reproductive technology, which could be limited to hyper-responders. Other suggested advantages of eFET include better obstetric and perinatal outcome. However, recent studies show that frozen embryo transfers can be associated with serious complications including hypertensive disorders during pregnancy, placenta accreta, or increased perinatal mortality.

SUMMARY

The evidence behind advantages of eFET is of low quality. As such, switching to a universal eFET strategy does not seem justified. New RCTs including women from different strata of ovarian response are needed.