Evaluation of Prostate Cancer with 11C- and 18F-Choline PET/CT: Diagnosis and Initial Staging

A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study on the Impact of [18F]F-Choline PET/CT Versus Conventional Imaging for Staging Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Cancer

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of [18F]F-choline PET/CT with conventional imaging for staging and managing intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). The primary objective was to assess the ability of PET/CT with [18F]F-choline to identify lymph node and systemic involvement during initial staging. Secondary objectives included evaluating the impact of [18F]F-choline PET/CT on unnecessary local treatments and assessing the safety of [18F]F-choline agents. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze recurrence-free survival and overall survival 5 y after randomization. Methods: A prospective controlled, open, randomized multicenter phase III trial involving 7 Italian centers was conducted. Eligible patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. Two groups were formed: one undergoing conventional imaging (abdominopelvic contrast-enhanced CT and bone scanning) and the other receiving conventional imaging plus [18F]F-choline PET/CT. The study was terminated prematurely; however, all the endpoints were thoroughly analyzed and enriched. Results: Between February 2016 and December 2020, 256 patients were randomly assigned. In total, 236 patients (117 in the control arm and 119 in the experimental arm) were considered for the final assessment. In the experimental arm, the sensitivity for lymph node metastases, determined by final pathology and serial prostate-specific antigen evaluations, was higher than in the control arm (77.78% vs. 28.57% and 65.62% vs. 17.65%, respectively). The [18F]F-choline was tolerated well. The use of [18F]F-choline PET/CT resulted in an approximately 8% reduction in unnecessary extended lymphadenectomy compared with contrast-enhanced CT. Additionally, [18F]F-choline PET/CT had a marginal impact on 5-y overall survival, contributing to a 4% increase in survival rates. Conclusion: In the initial staging of PCa, [18F]F-choline PET/CT exhibited diagnostic performance superior to that of conventional imaging for detecting metastases. [18F]F-choline PET/CT reduced the rate of unnecessary extensive lymphadenectomy by up to 8%. These findings support the consideration of discontinuing conventional imaging for staging PCa.

Correlation between choline kinase alpha expression and 11C-choline accumulation in breast cancer using positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a retrospective study

Choline kinase (CK) is reportedly overexpressed in various malignancies. Among its isoforms, CKα overexpression is presumably related to oncogenic change. Choline positron emission tomography (PET) is reportedly useful for detecting and evaluating therapy outcomes in malignancies. In this study, we investigated the correlation between CKα expression and 11C-choline accumulation in breast cancer cells. We also compared the CKα expression level with other pathological findings for investigating tumour activity. Fifty-six patients with breast cancer (mean age: 51 years) who underwent their first medical examination between May 2007 and December 2008 were enrolled. All the patients underwent 11C-choline PET/computed tomography imaging prior to surgery. The maximum standardised uptake value was recorded for evaluating 11C-choline accumulation. The intensity of CKα expression was classified using immunostaining. A significant correlation was observed between CKα expression and 11C-choline accumulation (P < 0.0001). A comparison of breast cancer mortality demonstrated that strong CKα expression was associated with a shorter survival time (P < 0.0001). 11C-choline accumulation was also negatively correlated with survival time (P < 0.0001). Tumours with strong CKα expression are reportedly highly active in breast cancer. A correlation was observed between CKα expression and 11C-choline accumulation, suggesting their role as prognostic indicators of breast cancer.

Lactate as Key Metabolite in Prostate Cancer Progression: What Are the Clinical Implications?

Advanced prostate cancer represents the fifth leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide. Although androgen-receptor signaling is the major driver of the disease, evidence is accumulating that disease progression is supported by substantial metabolic changes. Alterations in de novo lipogenesis and fatty acid catabolism are consistently reported during prostate cancer development and progression in association with androgen-receptor signaling. Therefore, the term "lipogenic phenotype" is frequently used to describe the complex metabolic rewiring that occurs in prostate cancer. However, a new scenario has emerged in which lactate may play a major role. Alterations in oncogenes/tumor suppressors, androgen signaling, hypoxic conditions, and cells in the tumor microenvironment can promote aerobic glycolysis in prostate cancer cells and the release of lactate in the tumor microenvironment, favoring immune evasion and metastasis. As prostate cancer is composed of metabolically heterogenous cells, glycolytic prostate cancer cells or cancer-associated fibroblasts can also secrete lactate and create "symbiotic" interactions with oxidative prostate cancer cells via lactate shuttling to sustain disease progression. Here, we discuss the multifaceted role of lactate in prostate cancer progression, taking into account the influence of the systemic metabolic and gut microbiota. We call special attention to the clinical opportunities of imaging lactate accumulation for patient stratification and targeting lactate metabolism.

A prospective comparative study of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging in suspicious prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET/CT imaging has limitations in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). We recruited 207 participants with suspicious PCa to perform PET/CT imaging with radiolabeled gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) antagonist, [68Ga]Ga-RM26, and compare with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and histopathology.

METHODS

Every participant with suspicious PCa was scanned with both [68Ga]Ga-RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT. PET/CT imaging was compared using pathologic specimens as a reference standard.

RESULTS

Of the 207 participants analyzed, 125 had cancer, and 82 were diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The sensitivity and specificity of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT imaging differed significantly for detecting clinically significant PCa. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.54 for [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT and 0.91 for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT in detecting PCa. For clinically significant PCa imaging, the AUCs were 0.51 vs. 0.93, respectively. [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT imaging had higher sensitivity for PCa with Gleason score (GS) = 6 (p = 0.03) than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT but poor specificity (20.73%). In the group with PSA < 10 ng/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT were lower than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT (60.00% vs. 80.30%, p = 0.12, 23.26% vs. 88.37%, p = 0.000, and 0.524 vs. 0.822, p = 0.000, respectively). [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT exhibited significantly higher SUVmax in specimens with GS = 6 (p = 0.04) and in the low-risk group (p = 0.01), and its uptake did not increase with PSA level, GS, or clinical stage.

CONCLUSION

This prospective study provided evidence for the superior accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT over [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT in detecting more clinically significant PCa. [68Ga]Ga-RM26 PET/CT showed an advantage for imaging low-risk PCa.

Theranostics of Primary Prostate Cancer: Beyond PSMA and GRP-R

The imaging of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) is now widely used at the initial staging of prostate cancers in patients with a high metastatic risk. However, its ability to detect low-grade tumor lesions is not optimal.

METHODS

First, we prospectively performed neurotensin receptor-1 (NTS₁) IHC in a series of patients receiving both [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-617 and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-RM2 before prostatectomy. In this series, PSMA and GRP-R IHC were also available (n = 16). Next, we aimed at confirming the PSMA/GRP-R/NTS₁ expression profile by retrospective autoradiography (n = 46) using a specific radiopharmaceuticals study and also aimed to decipher the expression of less-investigated targets such as NTS₂, SST₂ and CXCR4.

RESULTS

In the IHC study, all samples with negative PSMA staining (two patients with ISUP 2 and one with ISUP 3) were strongly positive for NTS₁ staining. No samples were negative for all three stains-for PSMA, GRP-R or NTS₁. In the autoradiography study, binding of [¹¹¹In]In-PSMA-617 was high in all ISUP groups. However, some samples did not bind or bound weakly to [¹¹¹In]In-PSMA-617 (9%). In these cases, binding of [¹¹¹n]In-JMV 6659 and [¹¹¹In]In-JMV 7488 towards NTS₁ and NTS₂ was high.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting PSMA and NTS₁/NTS₂ could allow for the detection of all intraprostatic lesions.

Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT and 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT in Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer Who Are Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Single-Arm, Single-Center, Phase II Study

Considering the wide range of therapeutic options for localized prostate cancer (e.g., active surveillance, radiation-beam therapy, focal therapy, and radical prostatectomy), accurate assessment of the aggressiveness and localization of primary prostate cancer lesions is essential for treatment decision making. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recognize prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for use in initial staging of high-risk primary prostate cancer. The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R) is a neuropeptide receptor overexpressed by low-risk prostate cancer cells. We aimed to perform the first (to our knowledge) prospective head-to-head comparison of PSMA- and GRP-R-targeted imaging at initial staging to understand how PSMA PET and GRP-R PET can be used or combined in clinical practice. Methods: This was a prospective, single-center, diagnostic cross-sectional imaging study using anonymized, masked, and independent interpretations of paired PET/CT studies in 22 patients with 68Ga-PSMA-617 (a radiolabeled PSMA inhibitor) and 68Ga-RM2 (68Ga-DOTA-4-amino-1-carboxymethylpiperidine-d-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2, a radiolabeled GRP-R antagonist). We enrolled patients with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven prostate cancer. None had received neoadjuvant hormone therapy or chemotherapy, and all underwent extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Histologic findings served as a reference. Results: On a lesion-based analysis (including lesions < 0.1 cm3), 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT detected 74.3% (26/35) of all tumor lesions and 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT detected 78.1% (25/32; 1 patient could not be offered 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT). Paired examinations showed positive uptake of the 2 tracers in 21 of 32 lesions (65.6%), negative uptake in 5 of 32 lesions (15.6%), and discordant uptake in 6 of 32 lesions (18.8%). Uptake of 68Ga-PSMA-617 was higher when the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score was at least 4 versus at least 1 (P < 0.0001) or 2 (P = 0.0002). There were no significant differences in uptake between ISUP scores for 68Ga-RM2. Median 68Ga-RM2 SUVmax was significantly higher than median 68Ga-PSMA-617 SUVmax in the ISUP-2 subgroup (P = 0.01). Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT is useful to depict higher, more clinically significant ISUP score lesions, and 68Ga-RM2 PET/CT has a higher detection rate for low-ISUP tumors. Combining PSMA PET and GRP-R PET allows for better classification of intraprostatic lesions.

Utility of Lymphadenectomy in Prostate Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on lymph node dissection (LND) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). Despite a growing body of evidence, the utility and therapeutic and prognostic value of such an approach, as well as the optimal extent of LND, remain unsolved issues. Although LND is the most accurate staging procedure, the direct therapeutic effect is still not evident from the current literature, which limits the possibility of establishing clear recommendations. This indicates the need for further robust and adequately designed high-quality clinical trials.

Stereotactic radiotherapy for bone oligometastases

About 60–90% of cancer patients are estimated to develop bone metastases, particularly in the spine.

Bone scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT ) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI ) are currently used to assess metastatic bone disease; positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT ) has become more widespread in clinical practice because of its high sensitivity and specificity with about 95% diagnostic accuracy. The most common and well-known radiotracer is 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸FDG); several other PET-radiotracers are currently under investigation for different solid tumors, such as ¹¹C or ¹⁸FDG-choline and prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT for prostate cancer. In treatment planning, standard and investigational imaging modalities should be registered with the planning CT so as to best define the bone target volume. For target volume delineation of spine metastases, the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC ) of North American experts provided consensus guidelines. Single fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) doses ranged from 12 to 24 Gy; fractionated SRT administered 21–27 Gy in 3 fractions or 20–35 Gy in 5 fractions. After spine SRT, less than 5% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity. Late toxicity included the extremely rare radiation-induced myelopathy and a 14% risk of de novo vertebral compression fractures.

Translating a radiolabeled imaging agent to the clinic

Molecular Imaging is entering the most fruitful, exciting period in its history with many new agents under development, and several reaching the clinic in recent years. While it is unusual for just one laboratory to take an agent from initial discovery through to full clinical approval the steps along the way are important to understand for all interested participants even if one is not involved in the entire process. Here, we provide an overview of these processes beginning at discovery and preclinical validation of a new molecular imaging agent and using as an exemplar a low molecular weight disease-specific targeted positron emission tomography (PET) agent. Compared to standard drug development requirements, molecular imaging agents may benefit from a regulatory standpoint from their low mass administered doses, they nonetheless still need to go through a series of well-defined steps before they can be considered for Phase 1 human testing. After outlining the discovery and preclinical validation approaches, we will also discuss the nuances of Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies that may culminate in an FDA general use approval. Finally, some post-approval aspects of novel molecular imaging agents are considered.

The Evolving Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis and Prognosis Prediction in Progressive Prostate Cancer

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is widely used in prostate cancer to evaluate the localized tumor burden and detect symptomatic metastatic lesions early. ¹⁸F-FDG is the most used tracer for oncologic imaging, but it has limitations in detecting early-stage prostate cancer. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA is a new tracer that has high specificity and sensibility in detecting local and metastatic tumors. But with the progression of prostate cancer, the enhancement of glucose metabolism in progressive prostate cancer provides a chance for ¹⁸F-FDG. This review focuses on PET/CT in the detection and prognosis of prostate cancer, summarizing the literature on ¹⁸F-FDG and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA in prostate cancer and highlighting that ¹⁸F-FDG has advantages in detecting local recurrence, visceral and lymph node metastases compared to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA in partial progressive prostate cancer and castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. We emphasize ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can compensate for the weakness of ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT in progressive prostate cancer.

Metastatic Spread in Prostate Cancer Patients Influencing Radiotherapy Response

Radiotherapy and surgery are curative treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa) with a 5-year survival rate of nearly 100%. Once PCa cells spread into distant organs, such as bone, the overall survival rate of patients drops dramatically. The metastatic cascade and organotropism of PCa cells are regulated by different cellular subtypes, organ microenvironment, and their interactions. This cross-talk leads to pre-metastatic niche formation that releases chemo-attractive factors enforcing the formation of distant metastasis. Biological characteristics of PCa metastasis impacting on metastatic sites, burden, and latency is of clinical relevance. Therefore, the implementation of modern hybrid imaging technologies into clinical routine increased the sensitivity to detect metastases at earlier stages. This enlarged the number of PCa patients diagnosed with a limited number of metastases, summarized as oligometastatic disease. These patients can be treated with androgen deprivation in combination with local-ablative radiotherapy or radiopharmaceuticals directed to metastatic sites. Unfortunately, the number of patients with disease recurrence is high due to the enormous heterogeneity within the oligometastatic patient population and the lack of available biomarkers with predictive potential for metastasis-directed radiotherapy. Another, so far unmet clinical need is the diagnosis of minimal residual disease before onset of clinical manifestation and/or early relapse after initial therapy. Here, monitoring of circulating and disseminating tumor cells in PCa patients during the course of radiotherapy may give us novel insight into how metastatic spread is influenced by radiotherapy and vice versa. In summary, this review critically compares current clinical concepts for metastatic PCa patients and discuss the implementation of recent preclinical findings improving our understanding of metastatic dissemination and radiotherapy resistance into standard of care.

The Role of PET-CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer is the commonest malignancy to affect men in the United Kingdom. Extraprostatic disease detection at staging and in the setting of biochemical recurrence is essential in determining treatment strategy. Conventional imaging including computed tomography and bone scintigraphy are limited in their ability to detect sites of loco-regional nodal and metastatic bone disease, particularly at clinically relevant low prostate-specific antigen levels. The use of positron emission tomography-computed tomography has helped overcome these deficiencies and is leading a paradigm shift in the management of prostate cancer using a wide range of radiopharmaceuticals. Their mechanisms of action, utility in both staging and biochemical recurrence, and comparative strengths and weaknesses will be covered in this article.

Molecular imaging of prostate cancer: Review of imaging agents, modalities, and current status

INTRODUCTION

The clinical course of Prostate cancer (PCa) are markedly diverse, ranging from indolent to highly aggressive disseminated disease. Molecular imaging techniques are playing an increasing role in early PCa detection, staging and disease recurrence. There are some molecular imaging modalities, radiotracers agents and its performance are important in current clinical practice PCa.

OBJECTIVE

This review summarizes the latest information regarding molecular imaging of PCa and is designed to assist urologists with ordering and interpreting these modalities and different radiotracers for different patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A PubMed-based literature search was conducted up to September 2019. We selected the most recent and relevant original articles, metanalysis and reviews that have provided relevant information to guide molecular imaging modalities and radiotracers use.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In this review, we discuss 3 main molecular imaging modalities and 7 radiotracer technologies available.

CONCLUSIONS

The use molecular imaging modalities and radiotracers has a unique role in biochemical recurrence and diagnosis of ganglionar and bone progression of PCa. In the present time, no one of these molecular imaging modalities can be recommended over the classical work-up of abdominopelvic CT scan and bone scan, and large-scale and multi-institutional studies are required to validate the efficacy and cost utility of these new technologies.

Comparison of the radiolabeled PSMA-inhibitor 111In-PSMA-617 and the radiolabeled GRP-R antagonist 111In-RM2 in primary prostate cancer samples

Purpose

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R) are expressed in prostate cancer and can be targeted with radiolabeled inhibitors and antagonists. Their performances for the initial characterization of prostatic tumors have been barely evaluated but never compared. We aimed to gather comparative preclinical data of the role of PSMA and GRP-R targeting in prostate cancer.

Procedures

We retrospectively studied 20 frozen prostatectomy samples with various metastatic risks of the D’Amico classification. Tissue samples were investigated by tissular microimaging using the radiolabeled PSMA inhibitor ¹¹¹In-PSMA-617 and the radiolabeled GRP-R antagonist ¹¹¹In-RM2. Bindings of the two radiopharmaceuticals were compared to histology and clinico-biological data (Gleason score, PSA values, metastatic risks).

Results

Binding of ¹¹¹In-PSMA-617 was high whatever the metastatic risk (p = 0.665), Gleason score (p = 0.555), or PSA value (p = 0.404) while ¹¹¹In-RM2 exhibited a significantly higher binding in the low metastatic risk group (p = 0.046), in the low PSA value group (p = 0.001), and in samples with Gleason 6 score (p = 0.006).

Conclusion

PSMA and GRP-R based imaging might have complementary performances for the initial characterization of prostatic tumors. Prospective clinical studies comparing the two tracers in this setting are needed.

Focal therapy for prostate cancer: concepts and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present a perspective on the current status and future directions of focal therapy for prostate cancer (PCa).

RECENT FINDINGS

Focal therapy for localized PCa is a rapidly evolving field. Various recent concepts - the index lesion driving prognosis, the enhanced detection of clinically significant PCa using multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsy, improved risk-stratification using novel blood/tissue biomarkers, the recognition that reducing radical treatment-related morbidity (along with reducing pathologic progression) is a clinically meaningful end-point - have all led to a growing interest in focal therapy. Novel focal therapy modalities are being investigated, mostly in phase 1 and 2 studies. Recently, level I prospective randomized data comparing partial gland ablation with a standard-of-care treatment became available from one study. Recent developments in imaging, including 7-T MRI, functional imaging, radiomics and contrast-enhanced ultrasound show early promise. We also discuss emerging concepts in patient selection for focal therapy.

SUMMARY

PCa focal therapy has evolved considerably in the recent few years. Overall, these novel focal therapy treatments demonstrate safety and feasibility, low treatment-related toxicity and acceptable short-term and in some cases medium-term oncologic outcomes. As imaging techniques evolve, patient selection, detection of clinically significant PCa and noninvasive assessment of therapeutic efficacy will be further optimized. The aspirational goal of achieving oncologic control while reducing radical treatment-related morbidity will drive further innovation in the field.

Positron emission tomography in prostate cancer: An update on state of the art

Prostate cancer (PCa), one of the most common cancers in males, is a topic of active interest in imaging research. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) have enabled the combination of morphologic and functional imaging with the promise of providing better information in guiding therapy. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose, the workhorse radiopharmaceutical in PET imaging, has not found preference in PCa since these tumors show poor glucose uptake and can be obscured by the normal urinary excretion of the radiotracer. Hence, the last two decades have seen the development of multiple newer radiotracers and better optimization of the technical aspects of PET imaging. The combination of functional imaging and MRI holds great promise. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed literature concerning the advances and newer developments in the imaging of PCa between the years 2005 and 2017. This review aims at summarizing current evidence on the role of PET imaging in PCa and its impact on the diagnosis, staging, prognostication, response assessment, and restaging of this malignancy.

Application of Deep Learning in Automated Analysis of Molecular Images in Cancer: A Survey

Molecular imaging enables the visualization and quantitative analysis of the alterations of biological procedures at molecular and/or cellular level, which is of great significance for early detection of cancer. In recent years, deep leaning has been widely used in medical imaging analysis, as it overcomes the limitations of visual assessment and traditional machine learning techniques by extracting hierarchical features with powerful representation capability. Research on cancer molecular images using deep learning techniques is also increasing dynamically. Hence, in this paper, we review the applications of deep learning in molecular imaging in terms of tumor lesion segmentation, tumor classification, and survival prediction. We also outline some future directions in which researchers may develop more powerful deep learning models for better performance in the applications in cancer molecular imaging.

18F-Choline PET/CT scan in staging and biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients: Changes in classification and radiotherapy planning

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of the ¹⁸F-Choline PET/CT in prostate cancer management when detecting distant disease in planning radiotherapy and staging and to evaluate the therapy changes guided by PET/TC results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective evaluation was performed on ¹⁸F-Choline PET/CT scans of patients with prostate cancer. Staging and planning radiotherapy scans were selected in patients with at least 9 months follow up. There was a total of 56 studies, 33 (58.93%) for staging, and 23 (41.07%) for planning radiotherapy. All scans were obtained using a hybrid PET/CT scanner. The PET/CT acquisition protocol consisted of a dual-phase procedure after the administration of an intravenous injection of 296-370MBq of ¹⁸F-Choline.

RESULTS

There were 43 out of 56 (76.8%) scans considered as positive, and 13 (23.2%) were negative. The TNM staging was changed in 13 (23.2%) scans. The PET/CT findings ruled out distant disease in 4 out of 13 scans, and unknown distant disease was detected in 9 (69.3%) scans.

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁸F-Choline PET/CT is a useful technique for detecting unknown distant disease in prostate cancer when staging and planning radiotherapy. The inclusion of ¹⁸F-choline PET/CT should be considered in prostate cancer management protocols.