Use of Simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI for the Detection of Spondylodiskitis

Application of Nuclear Medicine Techniques in Musculoskeletal Infection: Current Trends and Future Prospects

Nuclear medicine has become an indispensable discipline in the diagnosis and management of musculoskeletal infections. Radionuclide tests serve as a valuable diagnostic tool for patients suspected of having osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, or prosthetic joint infections. The choice of the most suitable imaging modality depends on various factors, including the affected area, potential extra osseous involvement, or the impact of previous bone/joint conditions. This review provides an update on the use of conventional radionuclide imaging tests and recent advancements in fusion imaging scans for the differential diagnosis of musculoskeletal infections. Furthermore, it examines the role of radionuclide scans in monitoring treatment responses and explores current trends in their application. We anticipate that this update will be of significant interest to internists, rheumatologists, radiologists, orthopedic surgeons, rehabilitation physicians, and other specialists involved in musculoskeletal pathology.

What Role Does PET/MRI Play in Musculoskeletal Disorders?

Musculoskeletal disorders of nononcological origin are one of the most frequent reasons for consultation. Patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders also consult more than once for the same reason. This results in multiple clinical follow-ups after several radiological and serum examinations, the main ones including X-rays targeting the painful anatomical region and inflammatory serum parameters. As part of their work up, patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders often require multisequence, multi-parameter MRI. PET/MRI is a promising imaging modality for their diagnosis, with the added advantage of being able to be performed in a single visit. PET/MRI is particularly useful for diagnosing osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, arthritis, many pediatric pathologies, and a wide range of other musculoskeletal pathologies. PET/MRI is already used to diagnose malignant bone tumors such as osteosarcoma. However, current knowledge of the indications for PET/MRI in nononcological musculoskeletal disorders is based on studies involving only a few patients. This review focuses on the usefulness of PET/MRI for diagnosing nononcological musculoskeletal disorders.

Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in Diagnosis and Management of Spondylodiscitis

Vertebral osteomyelitis is the third most common form of osteomyelitis in patients over 50 years of age.Whereas prompt (pathogen-directed) therapy is crucially associated with better outcomes, the heterogeneous clinical presentation of disease with unspecific symptoms often delays adequate treatment initiation. Diagnosis requires a careful investigation of medical history, clinical findings and diagnostic imaging, including magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine techniques.Due to its high sensitivity, [18F]FDG PET/CT is becoming increasingly important in diagnosis and management of spondylodiscitis, especially in the postoperative setting with presence of spinal hardware or other implantable devices in which MRI is limited.

Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosis and management of spondylodiscitis

Vertebral osteomyelitis is the third most common form of osteomyelitis in patients over 50 years of age.Whereas prompt (pathogen-directed) therapy is crucially associated with better outcomes, the heterogeneous clinical presentation of disease with unspecific symptoms often delays adequate treatment initiation. Diagnosis requires a careful investigation of medical history, clinical findings and diagnostic imaging, including magnetic resonance imaging and nuclear medicine techniques.Due to its high sensitivity, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT is becoming increasingly important in diagnosis and management of spondylodiscitis, especially in the postoperative setting with presence of spinal hardware or other implantable devices in which MRI is limited.

The use of MRI, PET/CT, and nuclear scintigraphy in the imaging of pyogenic native vertebral osteomyelitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) is a severe infection with an increasing incidence globally. Although there is no widely agreed upon reference standard for diagnosis of the disease, imaging plays a crucial role. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the imaging modality of choice. In recent years, advances in imaging have allowed for a larger role for alternative imaging techniques in the setting of NVO.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, PET/CT, and nuclear imaging, namely 67Gallium and 99mTechnetium scintigraphy, in the diagnosis of pyogenic NVO.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

We conducted a systematic review of five medical databases and included all studies from 1970 to September 2021 that compared imaging techniques and provided sufficient data for diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

METHODS

Abstract screening, full text review, and data extraction were done by a pair of independent reviewers. Nonnative and nonpyogenic patients were excluded. A bivariate random effect model was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 1,123 imaging studies. The meta-analysis sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 90% and 72% respectively; those of PET/CT were 93% and 80%; those of 67Ga were 95% and 88%; those of 99mTc were 86% and 39%; and the sensitivity and specificity of combined Ga and Tc were 91% and 92% respectively in the setting of suspected NVO.

CONCLUSIONS

67Ga has the highest sensitivity for NVO, and its specificity is augmented when combined with 99mTc. MRI and PET/CT are both highly sensitive modalities, although the specificity of PET/CT is slightly better. MRI remains an appropriate initial test depending on the availability of other modalities.

Diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for suspected primary and postoperative pyogenic spondylitis

OBJECTIVE

Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET) and PET/CT have been suggested for confirming or excluding musculoskeletal infection but the diagnostic value of this tool for pyogenic spondylitis remains to be confirmed. This meta-analysis was performed to verify the accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT in diagnosing suspected pyogenic spondylitis by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library to retrieve diagnostic accuracy studies in which suspected pyogenic spondylitis was assessed with ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summarized receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) and the area under the sROC (AUC) were calculated by using Stata software.

RESULTS

A total of 18 eligible studies (660 patients) with suspected pyogenic spondylitis were included in the quantitative analysis. ¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT illustrated relatively high sensitivity (0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.95) and specificity (0.90, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95) for the diagnosis of pyogenic spondylitis. The pooled DOR and AUC were 86.00 (95% CI, 31.00-240.00) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.97), respectively. For diagnosing pyogenic spondylitis without previous spine surgery, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.85-0.97), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.77-0.97), 136 (95% CI, 35-530) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98), respectively. For diagnosing postoperative pyogenic spondylitis, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.93), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.96), 38 (95% CI, 9 to 167) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT presented satisfactory accuracy for diagnosing pyogenic spondylitis. The diagnostic effect of this nuclear imaging method for pyogenic spondylitis without previous spine surgery seems to be better than that for the postoperative ones. However, whether ¹⁸F-FDG PET and PET/CT could become a routine in patients with suspected pyogenic spondylitis remains to be confirmed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I evidence, a summary of meta-analysis.

Imaging in the Diagnosis of Nonspecific Pyogenic Spondylodiskitis

The prevalence of nonspecific pyogenic spondylodiskitis, associated with both a high morbidity and a high mortality, has increased in the last few decades. The diagnosis is often delayed because of the nonspecific clinical manifestation at the early stage. The reliability of radiographs is limited, particularly in early stage after the onset of infection. Computed tomography (CT) can reliably assess the bony condition with the possibility of spatial visualization. Contrast enhancement supports the detection of affected soft tissue. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) continues to be the gold standard in the diagnosis of spondylodiskitis. Sophisticated investigation protocols supported by gadolinium enhancement secure the diagnosis. MRI has a high resolution without radiation exposure. Different nuclear investigation techniques extend the diagnostic options. Reports of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (18-FDG-PET) are particularly promising to confirm the diagnosis. The drawback of the reduced image quality with respect to detailed anatomical information can be overcome by a combined simultaneous acquisition of CT or MRI. With respect to one of the greatest challenges, the differentiation between degenerative changes (Modic type 1) and infection at an early stage using differentiated MRI protocols and FDG-PET is promising. This overview presents a concise state-of-the-art look at radiologic investigations in case of suspected nonspecific pyogenic spondylodiskitis with the focus on a pragmatic approach.

Diagnostic value of hybrid FDG-PET/MR imaging of chronic osteomyelitis

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 2-[¹⁸F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) Positron Emission Tomography, paired with Computed Tomography (PET/CT) are commonly used modalities in the complicated diagnostic work-up of osteomyelitis. PET/MRI is a relatively novel hybrid modality with suggested applications in bone infection imaging, based on expert opinion and previous qualitative research. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI has the advantages of reduced radiation dose, more soft tissue information, and is deemed more valuable for surgical planning compared to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. The goal of this study is to quantitatively assess the diagnostic value of hybrid ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI for chronic osteomyelitis.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed by a nuclear medicine physician and radiologist on 36 patients with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI scans for suspected osteomyelitis. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were determined with the clinical assessment by the orthopaedic surgeon (based on subsequent intraoperative microbiology or long-term follow-up) as the ground truth. Standardized uptake values (SUV) were measured and analysed by means of receiver operating characteristics (ROC).

Results

This first study to quantitatively report the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 78%, 100%, and 86% respectively. Area under the ROC curve was .736, .755, and .769 for the SUVmax, target to background ratio, and SUVmax_ratio respectively. These results are in the same range and not statistically different compared to diagnostic value for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging of osteomyelitis in literature.

Conclusions

Based on the aforementioned advantages of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI and the diagnostic value reported here, the authors propose ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI as an alternative to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in osteomyelitis diagnosis, if available.

Simultaneous 18F-FDG-PET/MRI for the detection of periprosthetic joint infections after knee or hip arthroplasty: a prospective feasibility study

Purpose

This study investigated the diagnostic value of simultaneous 18F-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in suspected periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip and knee.

Methods

Sixteen prostheses from 13 patients with suspected PJI were prospectively examined using PET/MRI. Image datasets were evaluated in consensus by a radiologist and a nuclear physician for the overall diagnosis of ‘PJI’ (yes/no) and its anatomical involvement, such as the periprosthetic bone margin, bone marrow, and soft tissue. The imaging results were compared with the reference standard obtained from surgical or biopsy specimens and subjected to statistical analysis.

Results

Using the reference standard, ten out of the 13 prostheses (ten hips, threes knees) were diagnosed with PJI. Using PET/MRI, every patient with PJI was correctly diagnosed (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 100%). Considering the anatomical regions, the sensitivity and specificity were 57% and 50% in the periprosthetic bone margin, 75% and 33% in the bone marrow, and 100% and 100% in the soft tissue.

Conclusion

PET/MRI can be reliably used for the diagnosis of PJI. However, assessment of the periprosthetic bone remains difficult due to the presence of artefacts. Thus, currently, this modality is unlikely to be recommended in clinical practice.

Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging as a research tool in musculoskeletal conditions

Compared to positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT), the uptake of PET- magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been slow, even more so in clinical practice compared to the (pre-)clinical research setting. However, for applications in musculoskeletal (MSK) research, the combination of PET and MRI into a single modality offers attractive advantages over other imaging modalities. Most importantly, MRI has exquisite soft-tissue detail without the use of contrast agents or ionizing radiation, superior bone marrow visualization, and an extensive spectrum of distinct multiparametric assessment methods. In the preclinical setting, the introduction of PET inserts for small-animal MRI machines has proven to be a successful concept in bringing this technology to the lab. Initial hurdles in quantification have been mainly overcome in this setting. In parallel, a promising range of radiochemistry techniques has been developed to create multimodality probes that offer the possibility of simultaneously querying different metabolic pathways. Not only will these applications help in elucidating disease mechanisms, but they can also facilitate drug development. The clinical applications of PET/MRI in MSK are still limited, but encouraging initial results with novel radiotracers suggest a high potential for use in various MSK conditions, including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and inflammation and infection. Further innovations will be required to bring down the cost of PET/MRI to justify a broader clinical implementation, and remaining issues with quality control and standardization also need to be addressed. Nevertheless, PET/MRI is a powerful platform for MSK research with distinct qualities that are not offered by other techniques.

Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in musculoskeletal benign conditions

A wide spectrum of benign musculoskeletal (orthopedic and rheumatological) conditions affect the general population. Collectively, these are common, and they can inflict significant morbidity with resultant negative impact on the quality of life of patients. For many of these conditions, there is established evidence for research and clinical use of PETCT and MRI for assessment of disease. Introduction of integrated PET/MRI around a decade ago brought optimism that combining the strength of PET and MRI techniques on a single platform could have synergistic effect to benefit imaging assessment of patients, including in the context of benign musculoskeletal conditions. This review specifically focuses on the progress that has been made. This aims to showcase clinical studies derived primarily from the integrated PET/MRI platforms for the evaluation of common orthopedic and rheumatological conditions. Despite enthusiasm and progress by early adopters of the PET/MRI technology, significant barriers are present for its wider adoption, validation, and translation to routine clinical practice. Attenuation correction is a particular challenge which affects regions close to the skeleton and impacts PET/MRI assessment of musculoskeletal disorders. Continued effort on research and validation, as well as promotion of its multimodal multiparametric capability to clinical and pharmaceutical stakeholders, and increased availability through increased adoption of PET/MRI scanners internationally, may accelerate its translation into routine clinical practice in this domain.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Spine Infection

Spine infection is both a clinical and diagnostic imaging challenge due to its relatively indolent and nonspecific clinical presentation. The diagnosis of spine infection is based upon a combination of clinical suspicion, imaging evaluation and, when possible, microbiologic confirmation performed from blood cultures or image-guided percutaneous or open spine biopsy. With respect to the imaging evaluation of suspected spine infection, MRI without and with contrast of the affected spine segment is the initial diagnostic test of choice. As noncontrast MRI of the spine is often used in the evaluation of back or neck pain not responding to conservative medical management, it may show findings that are suggestive of infection, hence this procedure may also be considered in the evaluation of suspected spine infection. Nuclear medicine studies, including skeletal scintigraphy, gallium scan, and FDG-PET/CT, may be helpful in equivocal or select cases. Similarly, radiography and CT may be appropriate for assessing overall spinal stability, spine alignment, osseous integrity and, when present, the status of spine instrumentation or spine implants. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

State of the art of 18F-FDG PET/CT application in inflammation and infection: a guide for image acquisition and interpretation

AIM

The diagnosis, severity and extent of a sterile inflammation or a septic infection could be challenging since there is not one single test able to achieve an accurate diagnosis. The clinical use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([¹⁸F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging in the assessment of inflammation and infection is increasing worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to achieve an Italian consensus document on [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in inflammatory and infectious diseases, such as osteomyelitis (OM), prosthetic joint infections (PJI), infective endocarditis (IE), prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE), cardiac implantable electronic device infections (CIEDI), systemic and cardiac sarcoidosis (SS/CS), diabetic foot (DF), fungal infections (FI), tuberculosis (TBC), fever and inflammation of unknown origin (FUO/IUO), pediatric infections (PI), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), spine infections (SI), vascular graft infections (VGI), large vessel vasculitis (LVV), retroperitoneal fibrosis (RF) and COVID-19 infections.

METHODS

In September 2020, the inflammatory and infectious diseases focus group (IIFG) of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) proposed to realize a procedural paper about the clinical applications of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI in inflammatory and infectious diseases. The project was carried out thanks to the collaboration of 13 Italian nuclear medicine centers, with a consolidate experience in this field. With the endorsement of AIMN, IIFG contacted each center, and the pediatric diseases focus group (PDFC). IIFG provided for each team involved, a draft with essential information regarding the execution of [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT or PET/MRI scan (i.e., indications, patient preparation, standard or specific acquisition modalities, interpretation criteria, reporting methods, pitfalls and artifacts), by limiting the literature research to the last 20 years. Moreover, some clinical cases were required from each center, to underline the teaching points. Time for the collection of each report was from October to December 2020.

RESULTS

Overall, we summarized 291 scientific papers and guidelines published between 1998 and 2021. Papers were divided in several sub-topics and summarized in the following paragraphs: clinical indications, image interpretation criteria, future perspectivess and new trends (for each single disease), while patient preparation, image acquisition, possible pitfalls and reporting modalities were described afterwards. Moreover, a specific section was dedicated to pediatric and PET/MRI indications. A collection of images was described for each indication.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in oncology is globally accepted and standardized in main diagnostic algorithms for neoplasms. In recent years, the ever-closer collaboration among different European associations has tried to overcome the absence of a standardization also in the field of inflammation and infections. The collaboration of several nuclear medicine centers with a long experience in this field, as well as among different AIMN focus groups represents a further attempt in this direction. We hope that this document will be the basis for a "common nuclear physicians' language" throughout all the country.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40336-021-00445-w.

Assessment of Therapeutic Response in Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Using 18F-FDG-PET/MRI

Purpose: There is still no definite method to determine therapeutic response in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). We analyzed the value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for assessing therapeutic response in PVO. Methods: This retrospective study included 53 patients (32 men and 21 women) with lumbar PVO. The results of clinical assessments for therapeutic response were divided into “Cured” (group C) and “Non-cured” (group NC). The differences in clinical and radiological features of PVO lesions between the two groups were analyzed using clinical data and simultaneous FDG-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained at each clinical assessment. Results: Clinical assessments and FDG-PET/MRIs were performed at 41.89 ± 16.08 (21–91) days of parenteral antibiotic therapy. There were 39 patients in group C and 14 in group NC. Diagnostic accuracies (DAs) of FDG uptake intensity-based interpretation and C-reactive protein (CRP) for residual PVO were as follows (p < 0.01): 84.9% of the maximum standardized uptake value of PVO lesion (PvoSUV_max), 86.8% of ΔPvoSUV_max−NmlSUV_max (SUV_max of normal vertebra), 86.8% of ΔPvoSUV_max−NmlSUV_mean (SUV_mean of normal vertebra), and 71.7% of CRP. DAs were better (92.5–94.3%) when applying FDG uptake intensity-based interpretation and CRP together. Under the FDG uptake distribution-based interpretation, FDG uptake was significantly limited to intervertebral structures in group C (p = 0.026). Conclusion: The interpretations of intensity and distribution of FDG uptake on FDG-PET are useful for detecting residual PVO in the assessment of therapeutic response of PVO. The combination of FDG-PET and CRP is expected to increase DA for detecting residual PVO.

Clinical and Radiological Analysis of Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis Immediately after Successful Antimicrobial Therapy: Considerations for Assessing Therapeutic Response

Purpose: The clinical and radiological abnormal findings continue even after successful treatment in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis (PVO). We analyzed the clinical and radiological features of cured PVO based on ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (FDG-PET/MRI) and compared the radiological differences between FDG-PET and MRI for assessing therapeutic response in PVO. Methods: This study included 43 patients (28 men and 15 women) with lumbar PVO who had no recurrence after successful antimicrobial therapy. They were divided into two groups based on the location of maximum standardized FDG uptake value (SUV_max) of PVO lesion on FDG-PET/MRI when parenteral antibiotics were discontinued (31 in group A: Intervertebral structure; 12 in group B: Vertebral body and paravertebral muscle). The differences of clinical symptoms, hematological inflammatory indices, and radiological features were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The patients were treated with 42.28 ± 14.58 (21–89) days of parenteral antibiotics. There were significant differences in C-reactive protein (0.97 ± 1.10 vs. 0.51 ± 0.31 mg/dL, p = 0.041; normal range of CRP < 0.5), back pain (4.29 ± 1.13 vs. 3.50 ± 1.00, p = 0.040; visual analog scale), and SUV_max (4.34 ± 1.24 vs. 5.89 ± 1.57, p < 0.001) between the two groups. In the distribution pattern of PVO lesions, FDG-PET overall showed recovery pattern earlier than MRI did (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In cured PVO, the clinical features vary depending on the location of major structural damage of PVO lesion. The involvement of intervertebral structure is related with sustained back pain and elevation of CRP, and vertebral body/paravertebral muscle shows favorable clinical features despite advanced structural damages.

Application of Simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI for Evaluating Residual Lesion in Pyogenic Spine Infection: a Case Report

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the preferred imaging method for evaluating treatment response in spine infection. However, there are still no definite correlation between follow-up MRI findings and clinical status. Recently, Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) shows great potential as diagnostic and monitoring options. Simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI makes us to expect a huge synergic effect on diagnosis and evaluation of treatment response with metabolic and anatomical advantages in spine infection. We introduce an application of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for evaluating residual lesion in the patient with pyogenic spine infection.

Diagnostic and interventional management of infective spine diseases

Spondylodiscitis (SD) is one of the main causes of back pain. Although the low mortality, high morbidity is related to spondilodiscitys, leading spine instability, chronic pain or neurological deficit. Diagnostic imaging plays a primary role in diagnosing spondylodiscitis. However different accuracy is highlighted by different diagnostic tool, depending also on timing of disease which represents a cardinal element for the phenotypic manifestation of the disease, beyond spatial resolution and tissue characterization proper of specific modality imaging. Conventional Radiology (CR), Computed Tomography (CT) and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) all have proven to be of primary importance in the approach to spondylodiscitis, although magnetic resonance imaging has demonstrated the greatest advantage in identifying the disease from its earliest stages, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity (92% and 96%, respectively). This review focus on the role of different imaging modality in the approach to the spondylodiscitis, also addressing the role of interventional radiology that is pivotal not only for a diagnosis of certainty through biopsy, but also for a minimally-invasive treatment of paravertebral abscesses spondylodiscitis-related. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Diagnosis and Successful Management of an Unusual Presentation of Chronic Foot Pain Using Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Simple Surgical Procedure

A 61-year-old man presented with chronic dorsal foot pain of 9 years that worsened with ambulation. Conventional diagnostic imaging and medical workup were unrevealing, and ankle arthrodesis had been recommended by an orthopedic surgeon for pain relief. Instead, the patient participated in a clinical imaging trial designed for identifying pain generators using whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI). The scan revealed not only high 18F-FDG uptake at the site of pain, but also a hematoma and an inflamed, fibrotic, ruptured plantaris muscle. The fibrotic plantaris likely altered biomechanics with walking, explaining why symptoms worsened with activity. A simple tenotomy of the plantaris tendon was performed to decouple ankle movement from the plantaris injury, resulting in pain relief. This case illustrates the potential of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI to better localize pain generators.

Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with spinal infection: a systematic review and a bivariate meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Diagnosis of spinal infection (SI) is challenging and usually requires multiple tests. We aimed to perform a systematic review and a bivariate meta-analysis on the diagnostic role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with SI.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of studies published through February 2019 in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases was carried out. Studies investigating the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with SI were eligible for inclusion in the qualitative analysis. For the quantitative analysis, pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR-) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected SI were calculated on a per examination-based analysis. Pooled data were presented with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles (833 patients) using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were eligible for the qualitative analysis. Twelve studies (396 patients) were selected for the meta-analysis. Overall, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a very good diagnostic performance in patients with SI and several studies underlined the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the response to treatment. The bivariate meta-analysis on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in patients with suspected SI provided the following results: sensitivity 94.8% (95% CI 88.9-97.6%) and specificity 91.4% (95% CI 78.2-96.9%). The pooled LR+, LR- and DOR were 4.7 (95% CI 2.9-7.7), 0.11 (95% CI 0.07-0.16) and 63.4 (95% CI 28.9-139), respectively. No significant heterogeneity or publication bias was found.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a very good diagnostic performance in patients with SI and can be used in patients in which MRI cannot be performed or is non-diagnostic or inconclusive. Several studies underlined the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in assessing the response to treatment in patients with SI. Overall, larger multicentre and prospective studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.

Applications of PET-MRI in musculoskeletal disease

New integrated PET-MRI systems potentially provide a complete imaging modality for diagnosis and evaluation of musculoskeletal disease. MRI is able to provide excellent high-resolution morphologic information with multiple contrast mechanisms that has made it the imaging modality of choice in evaluation of many musculoskeletal disorders. PET offers incomparable abilities to provide quantitative information about molecular and physiologic changes that often precede structural and biochemical changes. In combination, hybrid PET-MRI can enhance imaging of musculoskeletal disorders through early detection of disease as well as improved diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. The purpose of this article is to review emerging applications of PET-MRI in musculoskeletal disease. Both clinical applications of malignant musculoskeletal disease as well as new opportunities to incorporate the molecular capabilities of nuclear imaging into studies of nononcologic musculoskeletal disease are discussed. Lastly, we discuss some of the technical considerations and challenges of PET-MRI as they specifically relate to musculoskeletal disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:27-47.

Joint EANM/ESNR and ESCMID-endorsed consensus document for the diagnosis of spine infection (spondylodiscitis) in adults

PURPOSE

Diagnosis of spondylodiscitis (SD) may be challenging due to the nonspecific clinical and laboratory findings and the need to perform various diagnostic tests including serologic, imaging, and microbiological examinations. Homogeneous management of SD diagnosis through international, multidisciplinary guidance would improve the sensitivity of diagnosis and lead to better patient outcome.

METHODS

An expert specialist team, comprising nuclear medicine physicians appointed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), neuroradiologists appointed by the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), and infectious diseases specialists appointed by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), reviewed the literature from January 2006 to December 2015 and proposed 20 consensus statements in answer to clinical questions regarding SD diagnosis. The statements were graded by level of evidence level according to the 2011 Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria and included in this consensus document for the diagnosis of SD in adults. The consensus statements are the result of literature review according to PICO (P:population/patients, I:intervention/indicator, C:comparator/control, O:outcome) criteria. Evidence-based recommendations on the management of adult patients with SD, with particular attention to radiologic and nuclear medicine diagnosis, were proposed after a systematic review of the literature in the areas of nuclear medicine, radiology, infectious diseases, and microbiology.

RESULTS

A diagnostic flow chart was developed based on the 20 consensus statements, scored by level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus document was developed with a final diagnostic flow chart for SD diagnosis as an aid for professionals in many fields, especially nuclear medicine physicians, radiologists, and orthopaedic and infectious diseases specialists.

Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracies of F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Spondylodiscitis: A Meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracies of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of spondylodiscitis through a meta-analysis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is no meta-analysis study that compares the diagnostic accuracies of F-18 FDG PET and MRI for the detection of spondylodiscitis.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from the earliest available date of indexing to January 10, 2018 for studies comparing the diagnostic performance F-18 FDG PET with that of MRI for the detection of spondylodiscitis. We determined the sensitivities and specificities across studies, calculated the positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), and constructed the summary receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

In the seven studies (212 patients) selected, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of F-18 FDG PET were 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.98) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95), respectively. The LR syntheses showed an overall LR+ of 7.6 (95% CI: 3.4-17.2) and LR- of 0.05 (95% CI: 0.02-0.14). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 141 (95% CI: 44-444). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.65-0.95) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.48-0.80), respectively. The LR syntheses showed an overall LR+ of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.5-4.2) and LR- of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.08-0.60). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 11 (95% CI: 3-42). In the meta-regression analysis, no variable was identified as the source of the study heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The current meta-analysis shows that F-18 FDG PET has better diagnostic accuracy than MRI for the detection of spondylodiscitis. Further large multicenter studies would be necessary to substantiate the diagnostic accuracies of F-18 FDG PET and MRI for spondylodiscitis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Diagnostic value of FDG-PET versus magnetic resonance imaging for detecting spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spondylitis is a rare infection in bone requiring multiple diagnostic strategies for verification.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic values of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting spondylitis.

METHODS

Online PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched through September 2017 for studies comparing the diagnostic values of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET and MRI. The summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were calculated using Stata software. The ratio of these indexes between ¹⁸F-FDG-PET and MRI was also determined.

RESULTS

The summary results for ¹⁸F-FDG-PET were as follows: sensitivity=0.96 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.84-0.99]; specificity=0.90 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96); PLR=9.83 (95% CI, 4.39-22.03); NLR=0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.19); DOR=124.08 (95% CI, 39.04-394.34); and area under the SROC=0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98). The summary sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and area under the SROC for MRI were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65-0.84), 0.62 (95% CI, 0.45-0.77), 2.01 (95% CI, 1.36-2.98), 0.39 (95% CI, 0.27-0.56), 5.08 (95% CI, 2.66-9.69), and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73-0.80), respectively. The summary results of sensitivity (p=.034), specificity (p=.006), PLR (p<.001), DOR (p<.001), and area under the SROC (p<.001) were higher in ¹⁸F-FDG-PET than in MRI. However, NLR (p=.003) was lower in ¹⁸F-FDG-PET than in MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁸F-FDG-PET had a higher diagnostic value compared with MRI in detecting spondylitis.

PET/MRI in Infection and Inflammation

Hybrid positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MR) systems are now more and more available for clinical use. PET/MR combines the unique features of MR including excellent soft tissue contrast, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, fMRI and other specialized sequences as well as MR spectroscopy with the quantitative physiologic information that is provided by PET. Most of the evidence of the potential clinical utility of PET/MRI is available for neuroimaging. Other areas, where PET/MR can play a larger role include head and neck, upper abdominal, and pelvic tumours. Although the role of PET/MR in infection and inflammation of the cardiovascular system and in musculoskeletal applications are promising, these areas of clinical investigation are still in the early phase and it may be a little longer before these areas reach their full potential in clinical practice. In this review, we outline the potential of hybrid PET/MR for imaging infection and inflammation. A background to the main radiopharmaceuticals and some technical considerations are also included.

The diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and MRI in suspected vertebral osteomyelitis - a prospective study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F–fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing vertebral osteomyelitis.

Methods

From November 2015 until December 2016, 32 patients with suspected vertebral osteomyelitis were prospectively included. All patients underwent both ¹⁸F–FDG-PET/CT and MRI within 48 h. All images were independently reevaluated by two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to each others’ image interpretation. ¹⁸F–FDG-PET/CT and MRI were compared to the clinical diagnosis according to international guidelines.

Results

For ¹⁸F–FDG-PET/CT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV in diagnosing vertebral osteomyelitis were 100%, 83.3%, 90.9%, and 100%, respectively. For MRI, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100%, 91.7%, 95.2%, and 100%, respectively. MRI detected more epidural/spinal abscesses. An important advantage of ¹⁸F–FDG-PET/CT is the detection of metastatic infection (16 patients, 50.0%).

Conclusion

¹⁸F–FDG-PET/CT and MRI are both necessary techniques in diagnosing vertebral osteomyelitis. An important advantage of ¹⁸F–FDG-PET/CT is the visualization of metastatic infection, especially in patients with bacteremia. MRI is more sensitive in detection of small epidural abscesses.