Intended Versus Inferred Treatment After 18F-Fluoride PET Performed for Evaluation of Osseous Metastatic Disease in the National Oncologic PET Registry

Use of 18F-NaF PET in the staging of skeletal metastases of newly diagnosed, high-risk prostate cancer patients: a nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether preoperative staging of high-risk prostate cancer with 18F-sodium-fluoride (18F-NaF) positron emission tomography (PET) reduces the risk of skeletal metastases.

DESIGN

Nationwide, population-based cohort study using real-world data.

SETTING

The study used national health registries, including all sites in Denmark from 2011 to 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy from 2011 to 2018. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the preoperative imaging modality of either 18F-NaF PET or bone scintigraphy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) as a proxy for skeletal metastases following radical prostatectomy. The secondary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

Between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2018, 4183 high-risk patients underwent radical prostatectomy. Of these patients, 807 (19.3%) underwent 18F-NaF PET and 2161 (51.7%) underwent bone scintigraphy. The remaining 30% were examined by a different imaging method or did not undergo imaging. Using the inverse probability of treatment weighting to control potential confounding, the HR of experiencing an SRE for patients in the 18F-NaF PET group versus the bone scintigraphy group was 1.15 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.54). The 3-year survival rates were 97.4% (95% CI 96.1 to 98.7) and 97.1% (95% CI 96.4 to 97.9) for patients receiving 18F-NaF PET and bone scintigraphy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing preoperative staging with 18F-NaF PET did not display a lower risk of developing SREs after prostatectomy compared with patients undergoing bone scintigraphy. The survival rates were similar between the two groups.

Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT with fluoride PET/CT for detection of bone metastatic disease in prostate cancer

Background

¹⁸F-NaF positron emission tomography/computed tomography (fluoride PET/CT) is considered the most sensitive technique to detect bone metastasis in prostate cancer (PCa). ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 (PSMA) PET/CT is increasingly used for staging of PCa. This study primarily aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of fluoride PET/CT and gallium-based PSMA PET/CT in identifying bone metastasis followed by a comparison of PSMA PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) in identifying soft tissue lesions as a secondary objective.

Methods

Twenty-eight PCa patients with high suspicion of disseminated disease following curative treatment were prospectively evaluated. PET/CT examinations using fluoride and PSMA were performed. All suspicious bone lesions were counted, and the tracer uptake was measured as standardized uptake values (SUV) for both tracers. In patients with multiple findings, ten bone lesions with highest SUV_max were selected from which identical lesions from both scans were considered for direct comparison of SUV_max. Soft tissue findings of local and lymph node lesions from CE-CT were compared with PSMA PET/CT.

Results

Both scans were negative for bone lesions in 7 patients (25%). Of 699 lesions consistent with skeletal metastasis in 21 patients on fluoride PET/CT, PSMA PET/CT identified 579 lesions (83%). In 69 identical bone lesions fluoride PET/CT showed significantly higher uptake (mean SUV_max: 73.1 ± 36.8) compared to PSMA PET/CT (34.5 ± 31.4; p < 0.001). Compared to CE-CT, PSMA PET/CT showed better diagnostic performance in locating local (96% vs 61%, p = 0.004) and lymph node (94% vs 46%, p < 0.001) metastasis.

Conclusion

In this prospective comparative study, PSMA PET/CT detected the majority of bone lesions that were positive on fluoride PET/CT. Further, this study indicates better diagnostic performance of PSMA PET/CT to locate soft tissue lesions compared to CE-CT.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41824-022-00127-4.

Prospective Analysis of the Impact of 68Ga-DOTATOC Positron Emission Tomography-Computerized Axial Tomography on Management of Pancreatic and Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVES

A prospective clinical trial evaluated the effect of Ga-DOTATOC positron emission tomography-computerized axial tomography (PET-CT) on change in management of patients with lung, pancreatic, and small bowel neuroendocrine tumors. The primary eligibility criterion was a histologically proven tumor with positive somatostatin receptor subtype 2A immunohistochemistry. The primary and secondary end points were change in patient management and safety.

METHODS

Referring physicians completed questionnaires pre- and post-Ga-DOTATOC PET-CT, stating current and planned patient management, respectively, with tumor board adjudication of final management decisions. Change in management was categorized as follows: no change; minor change (additional imaging, supportive care); or major change (octreotide/lanreotide therapy, tumor biopsy, surgery, peptide receptor radiotherapy, chemotherapy, biological therapy, liver embolization).

RESULTS

A major change in management was recommended for 54 (47.37%) of 114 subjects and a minor change for 6 (5.26%) of 114 subjects, with no change for 54 (47.37%) of 114 subjects. Grade 1 adverse events were observed in 26 of 114 subjects (nausea, headache, back pain, diarrhea); one grade 2 (petechiae) and one grade 3 (abdominal pain) adverse event were observed. No grade 2 or 3 adverse events were related to study drug and none required intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging with Ga-DOTATOC PET-CT has a significant impact on management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

18F-Sodium Fluoride PET: History, Technical Feasibility, Mechanism of Action, Normal Biodistribution, and Diagnostic Performance in Bone Metastasis Detection Compared with Other Imaging Modalities

The skeleton is the third most common site for metastasis overall, after the lungs and liver. Accurate diagnosis of osseous metastasis is critical for initial staging, treatment planning, restaging, treatment monitoring, and survival prediction. Currently, ^99mTc-methylene diphosphonate whole-body scanning is the cornerstone of imaging to detect osseous metastasis. Although ¹⁸F-sodium fluoride (¹⁸F-NaF) was one of the oldest medical tracers for this purpose, it was replaced by other tracers because of their better physical properties, until recently. Continued development of PET scanners has opened a new era for ¹⁸F-NaF, and given its higher sensitivity, there have been increasing applications in imaging. In this review, we will discuss the history, technical aspects, radiobiology, and biodistribution of this tracer. Finally, we compare the accuracy of ¹⁸F-NaF PET with other conventional imaging methods for detection of osseous metastasis.

Molecular imaging of bone metastases using bone targeted tracers

Molecular imaging using bone targeted tracers has been used in clinical practice for almost fifty years and still plays an essential role in the diagnosis and follow-up of bone metastases. It includes both [99mTc]bisphosphonates for bone scan and [18F]NaF for positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) which are very sensitive to detect osteoblastic activity, but it is important to consider several aspects to increase the specificity of reported findings (such as specific tracer characteristics and mechanism of action, patient's clinical history, common metastatic patterns, changes after treatment, limitations of the technique, variations and pitfalls). This will enable useful information for clinical management being provided in the report. Furthermore, iatrogenic skeletal adverse events are common and they should also be identified, as they have impact on patient's quality of life. This review makes a brief summary of the mechanism of action of bone targeted tracers, followed by a discussion of classic patterns of bone metastasis, treatment response assessment and iatrogenic skeletal complications. The value of hybrid imaging techniques with bone targeted tracers, including single photon emission computed tomography and PET/CT is also explored. The final part summarizes new bone targeted tracers with superior imaging characteristics that are being developed, and which may further enhance the applications of radionuclide bone imaging.

18F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aims to establish the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients. The performance of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT was compared with other imaging techniques in the same cohort of patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed/Medline and EMBASE (last Updated, September 28, 2018). Studies with histopathology confirmation and/or clinical/imaging follow-up as reference standard were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies were included. Twelve studies including 507 patients provided per-patient basis information. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases were 0.98 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.93), 123.2 and 0.97, respectively. Seven studies provided the lesion-based accuracy information of 1812 lesions identified on ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT with the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98), 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.87), 206.8 and 0.97, respectively. The overall diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT is superior to ^99mTc-bone scintigraphy (AUC 0.842; P < 0.001; four studies) and ^99mTc-SPECT (AUC 0.896; P < 0.001, four studies). Compared to ¹⁸F NaF-PET/CT, whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was shown to have lower sensitivity (0.83, 95% CI 0.68-0.93), with no significant difference in the overall performance (AUC 0.947; P = 0.18, four studies).

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT has excellent diagnostic performance in the detection of bone metastases in staging and restaging of high-risk prostate cancer patients. The performance of ¹⁸F-NaF-PET/CT is superior to ^99mTc bone scintigraphy and SPECT, and comparable to DWI-MRI.

18F-NaF/223RaCl2 theranostics in metastatic prostate cancer: treatment response assessment and prediction of outcome

Theranostics refers to companion agents with identical or similar structure targeted to a specific biological entity for imaging and treatment. Although the concept has a long history with radioiodine in thyroidology, but it has experienced remarkable recent renaissance in management of neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. Bone scintigraphy based on osteoblastic reaction and targeted radionuclide therapy with the alpha-particle calcium-mimetic agent, 223RaCl2, also form a theranostic model for imaging and treatment of osseous metastatic disease. Since the regulatory approval of 223RaCl2 in 2013, there has been accumulating evidence on the potential use of 18F-NaF PET scintigraphy in the assessment of response and prediction of outcome in males with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer who undergo 223RaCl2 therapy. We review the 18F-NaF/223RaCl2 as theranostic companion in the management of prostate cancer with emphasis on the utility of 18F-NaF and other relevant PET radiotracers in the therapy response and prognosis assessments.