1
|
Vidal CI, Armbrect EA, Andea AA, Bohlke AK, Comfere NI, Hughes SR, Kim J, Kozel JA, Lee JB, Linos K, Litzner BR, Missall TA, Novoa RA, Sundram U, Swick BL, Hurley MY, Alam M, Argenyi Z, Duncan LM, Elston DM, Emanuel PO, Ferringer T, Fung MA, Hosler GA, Lazar AJ, Lowe L, Plaza JA, Prieto VG, Robinson JK, Schaffer A, Subtil A, Wang WL. Appropriate use criteria in dermatopathology: Initial recommendations from the American Society of Dermatopathology. J Cutan Pathol 2018; 45:563-580. [DOI: 10.1111/cup.13142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia I. Vidal
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology; Saint Louis University School of Medicine; St. Louis Missouri
| | - Eric A. Armbrect
- Center for Health Outcomes Research; Saint Louis University; St. Louis Missouri
| | - Aleodor A. Andea
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology; University of Michigan Medical Center; Ann Arbor Michigan
| | | | - Nneka I. Comfere
- Department of Dermatology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology; Mayo Clinic; Rochester Minnesota
| | - Sarah R. Hughes
- Department of Pathology; Gundersen Health System; La Crosse Wisconsin
| | - Jinah Kim
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology; Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford California
| | | | - Jason B. Lee
- Departments of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology; Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Konstantinos Linos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Lebanon; Hanover New Hampshire
| | - Brandon R. Litzner
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Via Christi Clinic; Ascension Medical Group; Wichita Kansas
- Department of Family Medicine; University of Kansas Medical Center-Wichita; Wichita Kansas
| | - Tricia A. Missall
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology; Saint Louis University School of Medicine; St. Louis Missouri
| | - Roberto A. Novoa
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology; Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford California
| | - Uma Sundram
- Department of Anatomic Pathology; Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine and Beaumont Health Systems; Royal Oak Michigan
| | - Brian L. Swick
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology; University of Iowa; Iowa City Iowa
| | - Maria Yadira Hurley
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology; Saint Louis University School of Medicine; St. Louis Missouri
| | - Murad Alam
- Departments of Dermatology Otolaryngology, and Surgery; Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; Chicago Illinois
| | - Zsolt Argenyi
- Department of Pathology; University of Washington; Seattle Washington
| | - Lyn M. Duncan
- Pathology Service and Dermatopathology Unit; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Dirk M. Elston
- Department of Dermatology; Dermatologic Surgery, Medical University of SC; Charleston South Carolina
| | - Patrick O. Emanuel
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine; University of Auckland; Auckland New Zealand
| | - Tammie Ferringer
- Departments of Dermatology and Laboratory Medicine; Geisinger Medical Center; Danville Pennsylvania
| | - Maxwell A. Fung
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; University of California, Davis School of Medicine; Sacramento California
| | - Gregory A. Hosler
- ProPath; Departments of Dermatology and Pathology; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center; Dallas Texas
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Departments of Pathology, Dermatology, & Genomic Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - Lori Lowe
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology; University of Michigan Medical Center; Ann Arbor Michigan
| | | | - Victor G. Prieto
- Departments of Pathology, Dermatology, & Genomic Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| | - June K. Robinson
- Department of Dermatology; Northwestern University; Chicago Illinois
| | | | - Antonio Subtil
- Department of Dermatology; Yale School of Medicine; New Haven Connecticut
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Departments of Pathology and Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vidal CI, Armbrect EA, Andea AA, Bohlke AK, Comfere NI, Hughes SR, Kim J, Kozel JA, Lee JB, Linos K, Litzner BR, Missall TA, Novoa RA, Sundram U, Swick BL, Hurley MY, Alam M, Argenyi Z, Duncan LM, Elston DM, Emanuel PO, Ferringer T, Fung MA, Hosler GA, Lazar AJ, Lowe L, Plaza JA, Prieto VG, Robinson JK, Schaffer A, Subtil A, Wang WL. Appropriate use criteria in dermatopathology: Initial recommendations from the American Society of Dermatopathology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 80:189-207.e11. [PMID: 29689323 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate use criteria (AUC) provide physicians guidance in test selection, and can affect health care delivery, reimbursement policy, and physician decision-making. OBJECTIVES The American Society of Dermatopathology, with input from the American Academy of Dermatology and the College of American Pathologists, sought to develop AUC in dermatopathology. METHODS The RAND/UCLA appropriateness methodology, which combines evidence-based medicine, clinical experience, and expert judgment, was used to develop AUC in dermatopathology. RESULTS With the number of ratings predetermined at 3, AUC were developed for 211 clinical scenarios involving 12 ancillary studies. Consensus was reached for 188 (89%) clinical scenarios, with 93 (44%) considered "usually appropriate" and 52 (25%) "rarely appropriate" and 43 (20%) having "uncertain appropriateness." LIMITATIONS The methodology requires a focus on appropriateness without comparison between tests and irrespective of cost. CONCLUSIONS The ultimate decision to order specific tests rests with the physician and is one where the expected benefit exceeds the negative consequences. This publication outlines the recommendations of appropriateness-the AUC for 12 tests used in dermatopathology. Importantly, these recommendations may change considering new evidence. Results deemed "uncertain appropriateness" and where consensus was not reached may benefit from further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudia I Vidal
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
| | - Eric A Armbrect
- Center for Health Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Aleodor A Andea
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Nneka I Comfere
- Department of Dermatology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sarah R Hughes
- Department of Pathology, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, Wisconsin
| | - Jinah Kim
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | - Jason B Lee
- Departments of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Konstantinos Linos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Brandon R Litzner
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Via Christi Clinic, Ascension Medical Group, Wichita, Kansas; Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Wichita, Kansas
| | - Tricia A Missall
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | - Roberto A Novoa
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Uma Sundram
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine and Beaumont Health Systems, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Brian L Swick
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - M Yadira Hurley
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Murad Alam
- Departments of Dermatology Otolaryngology, and Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Zsolt Argenyi
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lyn M Duncan
- Pathology Service and Dermatopathology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dirk M Elston
- Department of Dermatology, Dermatologic Surgery Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Patrick O Emanuel
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Tammie Ferringer
- Departments of Dermatology and Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania
| | - Maxwell A Fung
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California
| | - Gregory A Hosler
- ProPath and Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Departments of Pathology, Dermatology, and Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lori Lowe
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Victor G Prieto
- Departments of Pathology, Dermatology, and Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - June K Robinson
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Antonio Subtil
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Departments of Pathology and Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Litzner BR, Lee JB, Vidal CI. Review of the current medical literature and assessment of current utilization patterns regarding human papillomavirus in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in dermatopathology. J Cutan Pathol 2017; 44:938-943. [PMID: 28796379 DOI: 10.1111/cup.13021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Human papillomaviruses have been implicated in many cutaneous diseases. Practicing dermatopathologists often consider using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization to help clarify the histologic diagnosis, particularly in cases with borderline or nondiagnostic features. We reviewed the current evidence behind the use of these two techniques in dermatopathology. We identified only two studies utilizing the currently available immunohistochemical antibodies. We found more evidence regarding the use of in situ hybridization; however, the majority of this evidence focuses on diagnosing condylomas and other lesions of the genital skin. We also assessed current utilization patterns of attendees of the American Society of Dermatopathology annual meeting (Chicago, 2016) which revealed a wide spectrum of current utilization ranging from no use to regular use more than once per month. Two-thirds of respondents utilized these tests primarily when requested by the submitting clinician and one-third of the respondents utilize these tests reflexively in specific clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon R Litzner
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Via Christi Clinic, Ascension Medical Group, Wichita, Kansas.,Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas
| | - Jason B Lee
- Departments of Dermatology and Cutaneous Biology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Claudia I Vidal
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chang L, Ci P, Shi J, Zhai K, Feng X, Colombara D, Wang W, Qiao Y, Chen W, Wu Y. Distribution of genital wart human papillomavirus genotypes in China: a multi-center study. J Med Virol 2013; 85:1765-74. [PMID: 23861100 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.23646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Although it is understood that low-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes are associated with genital warts, there have been very few published studies reporting the genotype-specific prevalence of HPV among Chinese population. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of HPV genotypes in genital warts across China, and thus to evaluate the potential benefit of a quadrivalent HPV vaccine in this population. The tissue samples of a total of 1,005 genital warts cases were collected from seven geographical regions of China. HPV genotypes were analyzed using the general primer PCR and sequence-based typing method. Prevalence differences between sexes, geographical regions and age groups were assessed. The overall prevalence of HPV DNA in genital warts patients was 88.7% (891/1,005). Low-risk genotypes predominated, with a prevalence of 78.1% (785/1,005). The most prevalent genotypes were HPV-6 (41.3%), HPV-11 (37.6%) and HPV-16 (10.4%). Among HPV positive patients, single infections were more frequent (866/891, 97.2%) than co-infections (25/891, 2.8%). Both the overall prevalence of HPV DNA and that of HPV-6/-11/-16 (positive for any of the three types) decreased with age (P-trend = 0.010 and P-trend = 0.025, respectively). The prevalence of HPV-6/-11 (positive for either HPV type) and HPV-16 varied by geographic region (P = 0.003 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively). The prevalence of HPV-16 in female patients between urban and rural areas showed a marginally significant difference (P = 0.05). In sum, the results provide strong evidence that, in China, the most prevalent HPV genotypes in genital warts are HPV-6, HPV-11 and HPV-16. This indicates that a quadrivalent HPV vaccine may decrease the incidence of genital warts in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihong Chang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Department of Biochemistry, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith YR, Haefner HK, Lieberman RW, Quint EH. Comparison of microscopic examination and human papillomavirus DNA subtyping in vulvar lesions of premenarchal girls. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2001; 14:81-4. [PMID: 11479105 DOI: 10.1016/s1083-3188(01)00076-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to compare the microscopic examination and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA subtyping of vulvar specimens from premenarchal girls clinically diagnosed with condyloma to determine whether DNA subtyping aids in the diagnostic process. DESIGN A retrospective chart review was performed on all premenarchal girls who underwent surgical treatment of clinically diagnosed condyloma between 1993 and 1999 at the University of Michigan Medical Center by the Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology Service. Tissue was sent for pathologic evaluation and in 10 patients the specimens also underwent DNA subtyping. One patient had prior DNA subtyping. All the other lesions were surgically ablated. The microscopic slides were reviewed by a single pathologist blinded to the study. SETTING The study was performed in a tertiary care university hospital. PARTICIPANTS The study group included 11 premenarchal girls with an average age of 2.3 yr. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The charts were reviewed for previous HPV treatment, maternal history of HPV, history of sexual abuse, microscopic diagnosis, and HPV DNA subtyping. RESULTS Four patients had prior surgical treatment and two patients had undergone prior medical treatment. The microscopic diagnosis was condyloma in 8 patients, chronic dermatitis in 2 patients, and 1 patient had VIN 2-3. All 11 specimens tested positive for HPV DNA, 10 specimens contained at least one of the low-risk subtypes (6, 11, 42, 43, 44), and 1 tested positive for low-risk as well as intermediate/high-risk HPV subtypes (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 51, 52, 56). CONCLUSIONS Although all the patients with a clinical diagnosis of condyloma tested positive for HPV DNA, only 9 of 11 were definitely diagnosed with HPV-related pathology by microscopic examination. Therefore, in premenarchal patients with verrucous lesions in the anogenital area, microscopic evaluation alone may be inadequate as a confirmatory test when a positive clinical diagnosis has been made, and HPV DNA subtyping should be considered to avoid confusion with the diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y R Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0276, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|