Sucralfate versus placebo in reflux esophagitis. A double-blind multicenter study

ACVIM consensus statement: Support for rational administration of gastrointestinal protectants to dogs and cats

The gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal barrier is continuously exposed to noxious toxins, reactive oxygen species, microbes, and drugs, leading to the development of inflammatory, erosive, and ultimately ulcerative lesions. This report offers a consensus opinion on the rational administration of GI protectants to dogs and cats, with an emphasis on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine type-2 receptor antagonists (H2 RAs), misoprostol, and sucralfate. These medications decrease gastric acidity or promote mucosal protective mechanisms, transforming the management of dyspepsia, peptic ulceration, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. In contrast to guidelines that have been established in people for the optimal treatment of gastroduodenal ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease, effective clinical dosages of antisecretory drugs have not been well established in the dog and cat to date. Similar to the situation in human medicine, practice of inappropriate prescription of acid suppressants is also commonplace in veterinary medicine. This report challenges the dogma and clinical practice of administering GI protectants for the routine management of gastritis, pancreatitis, hepatic disease, and renal disease in dogs and cats lacking additional risk factors for ulceration or concerns for GI bleeding. Judicious use of acid suppressants is warranted considering recent studies that have documented adverse effects of long-term supplementation of PPIs in people and animals.

The Proton Pump Inhibitor Non-Responder: A Clinical Conundrum

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a highly prevalent chronic condition where in stomach contents reflux into the esophagus causing symptoms, esophageal injury, and subsequent complications. Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) remain the mainstay of therapy for acid suppression. Despite their efficacy, significant proportions of GERD patients are either partial or non-responders to PPI therapy. Patients should be assessed for mechanisms that can lead to PPI failure and may require further evaluation to investigate for alternative causes. This monograph will outline a diagnostic approach to the PPI non-responder, review mechanisms associated with PPI failure, and discuss therapeutic options for those who fail to respond to PPI therapy.

WITHDRAWN: Medical treatments in the short term management of reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Oesophagitis arises when reflux of acid from the stomach into the oesophagus causes mucosal inflammation. It is a common problem and a systematic review on the optimum treatment would be useful.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), prokinetic therapy, sucralfate and placebo in healing oesophagitis or curing reflux symptoms or both. To compare adverse effects with the different treatments.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the National Research Register until December 2004 and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials assessing the healing of oesophagitis or reflux symptoms or both. Treatment involving PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetics, sucralfate and combinations either in comparison to another treatment regimen or to placebo for 2 and 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviews independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 134 trials involving 35,978 oesophagitis participants. Five RCTs evaluated standard dose of PPI versus placebo in 965 participants. There was a statistically significant benefit of taking standard dose PPI therapy compared to placebo in healing of oesophagitis (RR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.31). Ten RCTs reported on the outcome for H2RA versus placebo evaluating 1241 participants. There was statistically significant benefit of taking H2RA compared to placebo in healing of oesophagitis (RR 0.74,95% CI = 0.66 to 0.84). Three RCTs evaluated prokinetic therapy versus placebo in 198 participants. There was no statistically significant benefit of taking prokinetic therapy compared to placebo in healing of oesophagitis (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.10). Twenty six RCTs reported the outcome for PPI versus H2RA or H2RA plus prokinetics, evaluating 4032 participants. There was statistically significant benefit of taking PPI therapy compared to H2RA or H2RA plus prokinetics in healing of oesophagitis (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.59).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PPI therapy is the most effective therapy in oesophagitis but H2RA therapy is also superior to placebo. There is a paucity of evidence on prokinetic therapy but no evidence that it is superior to placebo.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

GERD is a common chronic gastrointestinal disorder, and its prevalence in Asia is increasing. Classical symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation are common presentations. There is no standard criterion for the diagnosis of GERD, and 24-h pH monitoring lacks sensitivity in NERD. Furthermore, diagnostic studies for gastroesophageal reflux disease have several limitations. A short course of PPI is often used in clinical practice as a diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Elderly patients with GERD usually present with atypical manifestations, and they tend to develop more severe disease. PPI remains the mainstay of treatment for GERD. In a subset of patients who wish to discontinue maintenance treatment, anti-reflux surgery is a therapeutic option.

Review: treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in the elderly

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) increases with age; older patients are more likely to develop severe disease. Common symptoms of GERD in the elderly include dysphagia, vomiting, and respiratory problems. Older patients are more likely to require aggressive therapy, and usually their management is compounded by the presence of comorbidities and consumption of various medications. Proton pump inhibitors are the mainstay of GERD treatment in the elderly because of their profound and consistent acid suppressive effect. Overall, proton pump inhibitors seem to be safe for both short- and long-term therapy in elderly patients with GERD. Antireflux surgery may be safe and effective in a subset of elderly patients with GERD.

Medical treatments in the short term management of reflux oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Oesophagitis arises when reflux of acid from the stomach into the oesophagus causes mucosal inflammation. It is a common problem and a systematic review on the optimum treatment would be useful.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), prokinetic therapy, sucralfate and placebo in healing oesophagitis or curing reflux symptoms or both. To compare adverse effects with the different treatments.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the National Research Register until December 2004 and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials assessing the healing of oesophagitis or reflux symptoms or both. Treatment involving PPIs, H2RAs, prokinetics, sucralfate and combinations either in comparison to another treatment regimen or to placebo for 2 and 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviews independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 134 trials involving 35,978 oesophagitis participants. Five RCTs evaluated standard dose of PPI versus placebo in 965 participants. There was a statistically significant benefit of taking standard dose PPI therapy compared to placebo in healing of oesophagitis (RR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.31). Ten RCTs reported on the outcome for H2RA versus placebo evaluating 1241 participants. There was statistically significant benefit of taking H2RA compared to placebo in healing of oesophagitis (RR 0.74,95% CI = 0.66 to 0.84). Three RCTs evaluated prokinetic therapy versus placebo in 198 participants. There was no statistically significant benefit of taking prokinetic therapy compared to placebo in healing of oesophagitis (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.10). Twenty six RCTs reported the outcome for PPI versus H2RA or H2RA plus prokinetics, evaluating 4032 participants. There was statistically significant benefit of taking PPI therapy compared to H2RA or H2RA plus prokinetics in healing of oesophagitis (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.59).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PPI therapy is the most effective therapy in oesophagitis but H2RA therapy is also superior to placebo. There is a paucity of evidence on prokinetic therapy but no evidence that it is superior to placebo.

Emerging drugs for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a common medical problem caused by the exposure of the distal oesophagus to gastric contents. Existing medical therapy is very effective, but symptomatic relief with acid suppressants is often delayed. Treatment focuses on the suppression of gastric acid rather than on the underlying pathophysiological abnormalities, such as transient non-swallow-related lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation. Current pharmacological developments concentrate on drugs with lasting acid suppression and a faster onset of action. Compounds interacting with the complex neuromuscular regulation of the gastro-oesophageal junction are also being developed and offer exciting prospects.

Esophagitis and esophageal strictures

Esophagitis and esophageal strictures are important causes of esophageal disease in dogs and cats. Clinical suspicion is created when the clinician recognizes the clinical signs suggestive of esophageal disease and accounts for historical information and physical examination findings. Once suspected, the diagnosis of esophagitis and esophageal strictures is a fairly simple one in most cases. Although the benefit of diminishing secretion of gastric acid in patients with esophagitis is unquestioned, other questions regarding adjunctive medical treatments, such as sucralfate and glucocorticoids for dogs and cats with esophagitis, have not been answered through appropriate clinical studies. Esophageal strictures are readily treated with balloon dilation or esophageal bougienage, and clients can expect most patients to become functional, although dietary change may be necessary.

Pharmacotherapy for chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus

Over the last two decades there have been major advances in the medical treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and Barrett's oesophagus. Motility agents, H(2)-receptor antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) have all been evaluated in short- and long-term studies. Symptomatic response needs to be differentiated from healing of oesophagitis and maintenance of remission. Clinical trials have convincingly demonstrated the superiority of PPIs to motility agents and H(2)-receptor antagonists for all clinical aspects of GORD. Barrett's oesophagus requires lifelong acid suppression. Treatment with standard doses of PPIs is often insufficient and higher doses are frequently required. Medical treatment does not appear to result in clinically significant regression of Barrett's oesophagus.

On-demand and intermittent therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: economic considerations

Since gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a prevalent condition characterised by frequent relapses, long-term costs of management for this disease are high. Thus, strategies to decrease resource expenditures without impairing patient quality of life are desirable. On-demand therapy (one-dose when symptoms occur) and intermittent therapy (short course of medication when symptoms occur) are attractive since pharmaceutical expenditures may be decreased, and many patients self-employ this strategy. The purpose of this paper was to examine the economic implications of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD. A review of selected studies evaluating medication suitable for on-demand or intermittent administration was performed. A complete search for published studies on the cost effectiveness of on-demand or intermittent therapy for GORD was conducted, and the results discussed in detail. Antacids, alginates, topically active agents, histamine(2)-receptor antagonists, and proton pump inhibitors have all demonstrable efficacy compared with placebo when administered on-demand. Proton pump inhibitors constitute the most effective pharmacological means to treat GORD. Although step-up strategies initially using less potent medication may decrease resource use, cost-effectiveness analysis illustrates that on-demand or intermittent therapy with proton pump inhibitors may be reasonable options. Further work that defines quality of life and patient preferences associated with GORD may allow for proper allocation of resources for the management of this condition.

Pharmacological management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) ranges from episodic symptomatic reflux without oesophagitis to severe oesophageal mucosal damage, such as Barrett's metaplasia or peptic stricture. The multifactorial pathogenesis of GORD prevents medical cure of the disease. GORD is a chronic disease with a high tendency to relapse, requiring a long term treatment strategy in practically all patients. Complete healing of all mucosal lesions is not necessarily the aim of treatment in all patients. In milder forms of reflux disease, symptom relief is the most important goal. Many patients with mild GORD do well on symptomatic self-care with antacids and/or alginate. In addition, lifestyle changes should be advised to all patients: these improve symptoms and enhance the efficacy of therapy. In the acute treatment of GORD the prokinetic drug cisapride has been shown to be effective in relieving symptoms and healing grade I to II oesophagitis. Cisapride decreases symptomatic and endoscopic relapse in patients with mild GORD. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists are effective in relieving reflux symptoms in about 50% of patients, but with regard to healing, H2-antagonists appear to be mainly effective in grades I and II and not in higher grades of oesophagitis. Maintenance treatment with H2-antagonists is mainly symptomatically effective in patients with mild GORD. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) provide significantly higher healing rates of reflux oesophagitis than H2-antagonists, even in the more severe cases of oesophagitis and Barrett's ulcers. PPIs are also effective in patients with oesophagitis refractory to treatment with H2-antagonists. PPIs have become the drugs of first choice in healing of all patients with more severe forms of reflux oesophagitis, and increasingly also for patients with milder forms of oesophagitis, certainly those who fail to respond to other drugs. In maintenance treatment of GORD, PPIs are the most effective drugs, offering the possibility of keeping nearly all patients in remission with adjusted doses. Current patient data of up to 5 years indicate the safety of this strategy for this period, but the exact consequences of strong acid inhibition over a longer period still have to be clarified. At present, all but a few patients with GORD can be managed adequately by medical therapy.

Meta-analysis of the effect of placebo on the outcome of medically treated reflux esophagitis

BACKGROUND

To ascertain the placebo-induced effect in the treatment of reflux esophagitis, we reviewed all the English-language literature concerning the results of placebo-controlled trials of erosive/ulcerative esophagitis from 1976 to 1990. Twenty-two studies fulfilled our meta-analytic criteria.

RESULTS

After 4 to 8 weeks of treatment, active drugs (cimetidine, ranitidine, nizatidine, omeprazole, metoclopramide, sucralfate) were significantly more effective than placebo in the healing of esophagitis, with a pooled rate difference (PRD) of 0.22 in favor of the active drug, an odds ratio (OR) of 2.57 (confidence interval (CI) = 2.0-3.3). Pooled mean healing rate (+/- SD) with the active drug was 47.3 +/- 24.0%, as compared with 26.8 +/- 18.0% obtained with placebo after 4 to 8 weeks of treatment. With regard to symptomatic response, complete disappearance of symptoms was observed in an average of 31.6% active-treated patients and in 11.8% of placebo-treated patients, respectively. The PRD was 0.20, and the OR 2.25 (CI = 1.65-3.06). The incidence of side effects was not statistically different for the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Placebo is a relatively inactive drug in the short-term treatment of erosive ulcerative reflux and does not appear to change the natural history of the disease.

Review article: drug therapy for reflux oesophagitis

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a common disorder and symptoms can be mild to severe. Management of the disease should be individualized. Life-style changes are important for all patients. Drug therapy is often necessary but only very few patients with severe disease need surgical treatment. The purpose of this article is to focus on drug therapy and to review the clinical trials of all the drugs used for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Thereafter, judged solely on the data derived from these trials, a practical approach to the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is suggested.

Medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a ubiquitous problem, although therapeutic options continue to evolve. Effective therapy calls for understanding the pathogenesis. Key factors associated with GERD include incompetence of the lower esophageal sphincter, esophageal clearance, gastric contents, tissue resistance, and potency of the refluxate. Phase-type directed therapy remains the best treatment approach and histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists are now the cornerstone of therapy for patients not responsive to conservative measures. In a subset of patients with severe esophagitis who do not respond to conventional H2-receptor antagonist therapy, efficacy has been demonstrated with high-dose therapy. The acid suppressant omeprazole, highly effective in erosive esophagitis, is the drug of choice for esophagitis resistant to H2-receptor antagonists. Despite effective forms of therapy, relapse rates are high in patients with severe GERD, and maintenance therapy typically is required. With near uniformity, efficacy end points for these agents have been directed toward relief of heartburn, regurgitation, and dyspepsia. Few data exist correlating relief of GERD and improvement of chest pain. Although therapeutic strategies for treating GERD have improved, empiric treatment of suspected GERD in the patient with noncardiac chest pain does not appear to be the optimal approach and should be reserved for cases where diagnostic testing is limited or unavailable.

Maintenance therapy: Is there still a place for antireflux surgery?

Effective and safe maintenance medical therapy for uncomplicated reflux esophagitis is now feasible with omeprazole and it is likely that other H+K+ATPase blockers, and possibly very high dose H2 receptor antagonist regimens, will also be acceptable. In addition, many patients with ulceration, strictures, and Barrett's esophagus will respond to conservative medical therapy and a proportion of patients with erosive esophagitis may remain in remission with cisapride or with low dose H2 receptor antagonists, if disease is less severe. Thus, there is now a medical "gold standard" against which surgical therapy for uncomplicated esophagitis must be judged and it is essential that all future studies be conducted with clearly defined criteria for the assessment of the symptoms and endoscopic signs of esophagitis and its complications. As ever, the patient's wishes are paramount, but he or she must be allowed to select his or her therapy on the basis of a balanced and fully informed assessment of the long-term and short-term risks of all therapeutic modalities. The burdensome prospect of lifelong tablet ingestion and its potential dangers must be weighed against the alternative, in up to 30% of cases, that surgery may produce dysphagia, gas bloat, or dumping with no guarantee of a long-term cure.

Failure of sucralfate in the treatment of refractory esophagitis versus high-dose famotidine. An endoscopic study

Scarce data exist on the medical treatment of patients with peptic esophagitis who are non-responders to conventional or higher doses of H2-blocker agents, and no controlled trial on such patients has been published so far. We conducted a randomized single-blind study on the effects of 1 g sucralfate four times daily (n = 8), a mucosa-protective agent, versus 40 mg famotidine twice daily (n = 8), a new H2-blocker agent, administered for 12 weeks, in the treatment of peptic esophagitis (grades I to IV in accordance with Savary and Miller) refractory to a 6-month therapy with ranitidine at a dosage of 150 or 300 mg twice daily. Complete healing of the esophageal lesions was observed in none of eight patients receiving sucralfate, as compared with five of eight taking famotidine (p less than 0.05, Fisher exact test). Three of eight patients treated with sucralfate and three of eight with famotidine had complete disappearance of symptoms, whereas improvement was observed in two and three of eight, respectively (p less than 0.05 in both cases). We conclude that anti-secretory therapy is more effective than mucosal protection in the treatment of refractory peptic esophagitis.

Sucralfate versus cimetidine in reflux oesophagitis. A double-blind clinical study

Sixty patients with endoscopically verified oesophagitis entered a double-blind clinical study comparing 1 g sucralfate granulate given four times daily and 400 mg cimetidine twice daily. The efficacy, as judged by endoscopy and the symptomatic response, were studied after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Macroscopic healing of oesophagitis was defined as complete epithelialization of all oesophageal erosive lesions classified in accordance with Savary-Miller. Groups were comparable with regard to demographic data. The healing rate at 12 weeks' end point was 62% in the sucralfate group and 59% in the cimetidine group (NS). Half of the patients in both groups (NS) were relieved of symptoms. No adverse effects were recorded. Sucralfate and cimetidine appear to be equally efficient in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

Recent advances in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

The basis of treatment of reflux oesophagitis is change in behaviour and lifestyle. In the presence of mild symptoms antacids/alginate may be instituted. In case of Savary grade I and II oesophagitis at endoscopy, H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), alone or in combination with a prokinetic or mucosaprotective agent, are the first choice of treatment. Drug treatment should be continued for at least 8-12 weeks. In case of resistance to treatment or in case of severe and/or complicated reflux oesophagitis, omeprazole should be prescribed. Maintenance treatment is necessary in patients with severe reflux oesophagitis and in patients with quick relapses, once therapy has stopped. Full-dose H2RAs are required to prevent recurrences. In case of resistance to H2RAs, omeprazole should be used. Anti-reflux surgery should be considered in patients, especially at young age, who have an insufficient response to medical management, due either to lack of compliance or to therapeutic failure.