Screening for hereditary colorectal carcinoma

Colonoscopic perforation leading to a diagnosis of Ehlers Danlos syndrome type IV: a case report and review of the literature

Introduction

Colonoscopic perforation is a rare but serious complication of colonoscopy. Factors known to increase the risk of perforation include colonic strictures, extensive diverticulosis, and friable tissues. We describe the case of a man who was found to have perforation of the sigmoid colon secondary to an undiagnosed connective tissue disorder (Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV) while undergoing surveillance for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Case presentation

A 33-year-old Caucasian man presented to our hospital with an acute abdomen following a colonoscopy five days earlier as part of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer screening. His medical history included bilateral clubfoot. His physical examination findings suggested left iliac fossa peritonitis. A computed tomographic scan revealed perforation of the sigmoid colon and incidentally a right common iliac artery aneurysm as well. Hartmann's procedure was performed during laparotomy. The patient recovered well post-operatively and was discharged. Reversal of the Hartmann's procedure was performed six months later. This procedure was challenging because of dense adhesions and friable bowel. The histology of bowel specimens from this surgery revealed thinning and fibrosis of the muscularis externa. The patient was subsequently noted to have transparency of truncal skin with easily visible vessels. An underlying collagen vascular disorder was suspected, and genetic testing revealed a mutation in the collagen type III, α1 (COL3A1) gene, which is consistent with a diagnosis of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV.

Conclusions

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type, is a rare disorder caused by mutations in the COL3A1 gene on chromosome 2q31. It is characterized by translucent skin, clubfoot, and the potentially fatal complications of spontaneous large vessel rupture, although spontaneous uterine and colonic perforations have also been reported in the literature. The present case presentation describes the identification of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV in a patient with a non-spontaneous colonic perforation secondary to an invasive investigation for another hereditary disorder pre-disposing him to colorectal cancer. Invasive procedures such as arteriograms and endoscopies are relatively contra-indicated in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV. Alternatives with a lower risk of perforation, such as computed tomographic colonography, need to be considered for patients requiring ongoing colorectal cancer surveillance. Furthermore, management of vascular aneurysms in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV requires consideration of the risks of endovascular stenting, as opposed to open surgical intervention, because of tissue friability. Genetic and reproductive counseling should be offered to affected individuals and their families.

Family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps as a risk factor for colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of common colorectal cancer among first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps. In a population screening programme, 59406 subjects underwent an immunochemical faecal occult blood test. In a medical check-up-based cross-sectional study, 6139 subjects had a colonoscopic examination. They were divided into two groups, according to the results of a questionnaire on family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, and the detection rates for colorectal cancer were compared in the groups positive or negative for a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps. In the screening programme-based cross-sectional study, the detection rate for colorectal cancer was 0.57% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.76) and 0.15% (95% CI: 0.12-0.18) in subjects with and without a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, respectively, showing a significant difference in the detection rate for colorectal cancer between the two groups (P<0.05). In the medical check-up-based cross-sectional study, the detection rate for colorectal cancer was 2.31% (95% CI: 1.15-3.47) and 0.53% (95% CI: 0. 34-0.72) in subjects with and without a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps, respectively, indicating a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). These findings indicate that first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal adenomatous polyps have an elevated risk for common colorectal cancer, and that people with a family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps should be considered as a priority group for colorectal cancer screening.