Double-blind comparison of cefixime and cefaclor in the treatment of acute otitis media in children

Comparison of study designs for acute otitis media trials

BACKGROUND

A framework for evaluating the efficacy of antibiotics in development as well as those currently approved for acute otitis media (AOM) is needed.

OBJECTIVE

Review strengths and limitations of various antibiotic trial designs and their outcome measures.

METHODS

A review of 157 published trials involving 36,710 subjects for the treatment of AOM.

RESULTS

AOM trials have three designs: (1) clinical, clinical diagnosis and assessment of outcomes; (2) single tympanocentesis, microbiologic diagnosis (by middle ear fluid culture) and clinical assessment of outcomes; and (3) double tympanocentesis, microbiologic diagnosis and microbiologic outcome assessment. Identifiable strengths and limitations of each design are reviewed. Case definitions for entry of children in trials of AOM vary widely. The lack of stringent diagnostic criteria in a clinical design allows for inclusion of a significant proportion of children with a non-bacterial etiology (i.e., viral AOM or otitis media with effusion). Tympanocentesis increases diagnostic accuracy at study entry; however, the procedure is confounding because of its potentially therapeutic benefit and the procedure is not performed in a uniform manner. A second tympanocentesis allows a high sensitivity to detect microbiologic eradication, but it does not correlate with clinical outcomes in half of the cases. The timing of outcome assessment also varies widely among trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved clinical diagnosis criteria for AOM are needed to enhance specificity; emphasis on a bulging tympanic membrane has the best evidence base. Tympanocentesis within study designs has merits. At study entry it assures diagnostic accuracy but may alter outcomes and it is useful to document microbiologic outcomes but lacks specificity for clinical outcomes. For all designs, test of cure assessment 2-7 days after completion of therapy seems most appropriate.

Otitis media

Bacterial pathogens are isolated from middle ear fluid in up to 90% of children with acute otitis media (OM). Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis predominate. Acute OM can be classified as uncomplicated, persistent, recurrent or chronic. Patient age, symptom severity, prior treatment history and exposure through day-care attendance in children influences pathogen distribution, antimicrobial susceptibility and anticipated clinical and microbiological responses to empirical and pathogen-directed therapies. The natural history of acute OM without intervention is favourable. However, meta-analysis of clinical trials shows an improvement in symptom and middle ear effusion resolution with antimicrobials. Aminopenicillins, cephalosporins and macrolides are often selected as therapy for acute OM. The various agents have differing activity against acute OM pathogens, particularly organisms with resistance mechanisms and they differ in dosing schedule, side effects and compliance enhancing factors. Consideration should be given to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles in antibiotic selection. Selection criteria include antibiotic activity against drug-resistant S. pneumoniae and efficacy against beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative organisms. The necessary duration of treatment for acute OM varies according to multiple factors, including local preferences, but there is growing, compelling data to support short-course therapy. Tympanocentesis has been endorsed in various guidelines as a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Best-practice for management of acute OM continues to advocate antibiotic therapy with careful, accurate diagnosis and consideration of the major pathogens and their mechanisms of resistance.

Randomized clinical trial of soy formula with and without added fiber in antibiotic-induced diarrhea

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the effects of soy formulas with and without added soy fiber in children who developed diarrhea while receiving antibiotics.

DESIGN

In a masked, randomized parallel study, older infants and toddlers were fed commercial soy formulas with or without added soy fiber for 10 days on occurrence of diarrhea during the administration of antibiotics. Subjects were stratified by feeding (formula versus cow's milk). The primary variables were duration of diarrhea, stool characteristics, and intake. Secondary variables were weight and spit-up.

RESULTS

All 45 children who completed the 10-day study received >30% of their caloric intake from formula. Fiber intake from other foods did not differ between groups and averaged 0.5 g/day. Total median fiber intake of the group fed the formula with added fiber was 6.53 g/day. The mean duration of diarrhea was 25.1 +/- 5.2 hours for children fed the formula with added fiber and 51.6 +/- 10.7 hours for those fed the regular formula (P =.0013).

CONCLUSION

The duration of antibiotic-induced diarrhea in children fed the soy formula with added soy fiber was significantly reduced.

Bacteriologic efficacies of oral azithromycin and oral cefaclor in treatment of acute otitis media in infants and young children

A prospective, open-label, randomized study was conducted in order to determine the bacteriologic efficacies of cefaclor and azithromycin in acute otitis media (AOM). Tympanocentesis was performed on entry into the study and 3 to 4 days after initiation of treatment. Bacteriologic failure after 3 to 4 days of treatment with both drugs occurred in a high proportion of culture-positive patients, especially in those in whom AOM was caused by Haemophilus influenzae (16 of 33 [53%] of those treated with azithromycin and 13 of 34 [52%] of those treated with cefaclor). Although a clear correlation of the persistence of the pathogen with increased MICs of the respective drugs could be demonstrated for Streptococcus pneumoniae, no such correlation was found for H. influenzae. It is proposed that susceptibility breakpoints for H. influenzae should be considerably lower than the current ones for both cefaclor and azithromycin for AOM caused by H. influenzae.

Comparison of cefprozil, cefpodoxime proxetil, loracarbef, cefixime, and ceftibuten

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the pharmacokinetics, spectrum of activity, clinical trials, and adverse effects of cefprozil, cefpodoxime proxetil, loracarbef, cefixime, and ceftibuten, an investigational cephalosporin.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was identified by a MEDLINE search from 1986 to January 1995.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled studies were selected for evaluation; however, uncontrolled studies were included when data were limited for indications approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were evaluated with respect to in vitro activity, study design, clinical and microbiologic outcomes, and adverse drug reactions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Cefprozil, cefpodoxime proxetil, loracarbef, cefixime, and cefributen are active in vitro against organisms frequently involved in community-acquired infections such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, beta-lactamase-positive or -negative Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Except for cefixime and ceflibuten, they all are active against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Even though there were problems in study design (discussed within the text), clinical data demonstrate that these new oral beta-lactam compounds are as efficacious as conventional therapies for a variety of community-acquired infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefprozil, cefpodoxime, cefixime, loracarbef, and ceftibuten demonstrate in vitro activity against the major organisms that cause community-acquired infections. Clinical trials confirm that these agents are as effective as traditional therapies for the management of acute otitis media, pharyngitis/tonsillitis, sinusitis, bronchitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and skin and skin-structure infections. In addition, cefixime and cefpodoxime are effective therapies for uncomplicated gonococcal infections. Selection of a specific agent will be influenced by susceptibility data and safety, as well as issues of compliance and cost.

Selection of cephalosporins for hospital formularies

Because of the large number of cephalosporins available for use, and for economic reasons, most hospitals have restricted the number of cephalosporins for inclusion on hospital formularies. No more than one first-generation oral and parenteral cephalosporin is necessary. The second- and third-generation oral cephalosporins are more active in vitro against Haemophilus influenzae and Enterobacteriaceae, and the selection of one of these drugs should be based primarily on acquisition cost. There is usually minimal, if any, need for a second-generation parenteral cephalosporin on hospital formularies. The choice of a single third-generation parenteral cephalosporin should be made primarily on the cost of equivalent daily dosages. A single antipseudomonal cephalosporin should be included in the hospital formulary, and the selection should be based on cost and availability.

Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial drugs for acute otitis media: metaanalysis of 5400 children from thirty-three randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

To reconcile conflicting published reports concerning the absolute and comparative clinical efficacy of antimicrobial drugs for acute otitis media in children.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles were identified by MEDLINE search, Current Contents, and references from review articles, textbook chapters, and retrieved reports. Randomized, controlled trials of therapeutic antimicrobial drugs used in the initial empiric therapy for simple acute otitis media were selected by independent, blinded observers, and scored on 11 measures of study validity. Thirty English and three foreign-language articles met all inclusion criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were abstracted for an end point of complete clinical resolution (primary control), exclusive of middle ear effusion, within 7 to 14 days after therapy started.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The spontaneous rate of primary control--without antibiotics or tympanocentesis--was 81% (95% confidence interval, 69% to 94%). Compared with placebo or no drug, antimicrobial therapy increased primary control by 13.7% (95% confidence interval, 8.2% to 19.2%). No significant differences were found in the comparative efficacy of various antimicrobial agents. Extending antimicrobial coverage to include beta-lactamase-producing organisms did not significantly increase the rates of primary control or resolution of middle ear effusion. Pretreatment tympanocentesis was positively associated with individual group primary control rates, negatively associated with the ability to detect differences in clinical efficacy and unassociated with resolution of MEE.

CONCLUSIONS

Antimicrobial drugs have a modest but significant impact on the primary control of acute otitis media. Treatment with beta-lactamase-stable agents does not increase resolution of acute symptoms or middle ear effusion; initial therapy should be guided by considerations of safety, tolerability, and affordability, and not by the theoretical advantage of an extended antibacterial spectrum.