Two screening tests for urinary voiding dysfunction used in 209 consecutive patients undergoing lumbar spine operations

Improvement in Neurogenic Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction Following Posterior Decompression Surgery for Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective

The mechanisms of neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) and neurogenic bladder (NB), which are major consequences of spinal cord injury and occasionally degenerative lumbar disease. The following in patients with cauda equina syndrome who underwent posterior decompression surgery was investigated: (1) the preoperative prevalence of NBD and NB, measured using the Constipation Scoring System (CSS) and International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS); (2) the degree and timing of postoperative improvement of NBD and NB.

Methods

We administered the CSS and IPSS in 93 patients before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. We prospectively examined patient characteristics, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and postoperative improvements in each score.

Results

The prevalence of symptomatic defecation and urinary symptoms at admission were 37 patients (38.1%) and 31 patients (33.3%), respectively. Among the symptomatic patients with defecation problems, 12 patients had improved at 1 month, 13 at 3 months, 14 at 6 months, and 13 at 12 months postoperatively. Among the symptomatic patients with urinary problems, 5 patients improved at 1 month, 11 at 3 months, 6 at 6 months, and 10 at 1 year postoperatively. Comparing patients with improved versus unimproved in CSS, the degree of JOA score improvement was a significant prognosis factor (p<0.05; odds ratio, 1.05).

Conclusion

The prevalence of symptomatic defecation and urinary symptoms in patients with cauda equina syndrome was 38.1% and 33.3%, respectively. Decompression surgery improved symptoms in 30%–50%. These effects were first observed 1 month after the operation and persisted up to 1 year.

Incidence, prognosis, and risk factors for bladder and bowel dysfunction due to incidental dural tears in lumbar microendoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Despite the common occurrence of incidental dural tears, the incidence and prognosis of bladder and bowel dysfunction (BBD) due to incidental dural tears in lumbar spinal surgery are not well known because of the lack of reported cases.

PURPOSE

To analyze the incidence, prognosis, and risk factors for BBD after lumbar microendoscopic surgery with or without incidental dural tears.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We analyzed 2,421 patients who underwent lumbar microendoscopic surgery and investigated patients with BBD after an incidental durotomy during surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients were divided into three groups on the basis of dysuria and defecation disorders: severe BBD, mild BBD, and no BBD. The post void residual volumes before and after surgery were compared using an ultrasound bladder scanner or bladder catheterization after confirmation of urination. Bowel dysfunction was evaluated by subjective symptomatic deterioration and the increase in the frequency and duration of postoperative medical care.

METHODS

Risk factors for BBD were analyzed using surgical video documentation to determine the dural tear site and cauda equina exposure from the dural sac. Patients with BBD were prospectively followed up for prognosis determination. The chi-square test was used to compare the incidence of BBD between patients with dural tears and those without. Propensity score-adjusted logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of various factors on the incidence of postoperative BBD.

RESULTS

The incidence of dural tears was 6.9% (168/2,421). The overall incidence of BBD was 3.0% (73/2,421), while the incidences of BBD (mild+severe BBD) and severe BBD due to incidental dural tears were 1.2% (30/2,421) and 0.8% (20/2,421), respectively. The incidence of BBD in patients with dural tears and those without tears was 17.9% [30/168] and 1.9% [43/2,253; p<.001]), respectively. BBD rates at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery were 64.0%, 44.0%, 40.0%, 28.0%, and 13.6%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the male sex (odds ratio [OR], 4.20), dural tears in the central area (OR, 10.15), and exposure of the cauda equina (OR, 51.04) were significant risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of dural tears in lumbar microendoscopic surgeries are associated with an increased incidence of BBD. The recovery rate for BBD due to incidental dural tears is generally good; however, some patients experience long-term symptoms. Clinicians should be aware that incidental dural tears with cauda equina exposure can increase the risk of BBD.