1
|
Balls M, Goldberg AM, Fentem JH, Broadhead CL, Burch RL, Festing MF, Frazier JM, Hendriksen CF, Jennings M, van der Kamp AD, Morton DB, Rowan AN, Russell C, Russell WM, Spielmann H, Stephens ML, Stokes WS, Straughan DW, Yager JD, Zurlo J, van Zutphen BF. The Three Rs: The Way Forward. Altern Lab Anim 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/026119299502300614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Balls
- ECVAM, JRC Environment Institute, 21020 Ispra (Va), Italy
| | - Alan M. Goldberg
- CAAT, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 111 Market Place/Suite 840, Baltimore, MD 21202-6709, USA
| | | | - Caren L. Broadhead
- FRAME Russell & Burch House, 96–98 North Sherwood Street, Nottingham NG1 4EE, UK
| | | | - Michael F.W. Festing
- MRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Building, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK
| | - John M. Frazier
- Toxic Hazards Research Unit, ManTech Environmental Technology Inc., Dayton, OH 45431-0009, USA
| | | | - Margaret Jennings
- Research Animals Department, RSPCA, The Causeway, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 1HG, UK
| | | | - David B. Morton
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Ethics, University of Birmingham Medical School, Birmingham B15 2TJ, UK
| | - Andrew N. Rowan
- Tufts Center for Animals and Public Policy, School for Veterinary Medicine, 200 Westboro Road, North Grafton, MA 01536, USA
| | - Claire Russell
- Department of Sociology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AA, UK
| | - William M.S. Russell
- Department of Sociology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 2AA, UK
| | | | - Martin L. Stephens
- Humane Society of the United States, 2100 L Street NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA
| | | | - Donald W. Straughan
- FRAME Russell & Burch House, 96–98 North Sherwood Street, Nottingham NG1 4EE, UK
| | - James D. Yager
- Division of Toxicological Sciences, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Joanne Zurlo
- CAAT, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 111 Market Place/Suite 840, Baltimore, MD 21202-6709, USA
| | - Bert F.M. van Zutphen
- Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
ECVAM's role in the practical validation of replacement alternative methods for use in regulatory testing is reviewed, including an outline of the criteria which have been used in determining ECVAM's priorities. Some of the difficulties which have arisen in validation studies are discussed, and solutions to these are proposed, with particular emphasis on ensuring that methods are sufficiently well-developed to enter the validation process, and on the ECVAM prevalidation scheme for encouraging protocol optimisation and the prior assessment of interlaboratory transferability. Comments are made on problems encountered in selecting test materials backed by adequate in vivo data and in undertaking appropriate in vivo/in vitro comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Balls
- ECVAM (European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods), JRC Environment Institute, 21020 Ispra (Va), Italy
| | - Julia H. Fentem
- ECVAM (European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods), JRC Environment Institute, 21020 Ispra (Va), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Redfern WS, Waldron G, Winter MJ, Butler P, Holbrook M, Wallis R, Valentin JP. Zebrafish assays as early safety pharmacology screens: Paradigm shift or red herring? J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2008; 58:110-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2008.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2008] [Accepted: 05/08/2008] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
8
|
Marks F, Fürstenberger G, Heinzelmann T, Müller-Decker K. Mechanisms in tumor promotion: guidance for risk assessment and cancer chemoprevention. Toxicol Lett 1995; 82-83:907-17. [PMID: 8597161 DOI: 10.1016/0378-4274(95)03529-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
In mouse skin, tumor development promoted by 'non-genotoxic' carcinogens is closely related to the wound response. In both cases endogenous factors such as cytokines and eicosanoids released primarily from 'activated keratinocytes' play a key role as mediators of inflammation and cellular hyperproliferation. The liberation of interleukin-1 alpha and arachidonic acid from human keratinocytes has been used as an in vitro parameter of irritancy. The results (from experiments with 15 different chemicals) being validated at present in a clinical study indicate a quantitative relationship between irritancy in vivo and mediator release in vitro. In the course of experimental skin carcinogenesis an overproduction of eicosanoids due to a constitutive overexpression of the corresponding enzymes (i.e. PGH synthase-II and 8- and 12-lipoxygenase) is observed. Enzyme inhibitors, for instance nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), exert a strong tumoristatic effect. Thus, the approach of multistage skin carcinogenesis provides a suitable animal model for a mechanistic evaluation and further improvement of chemopreventive measures such as the inhibition of colorectal tumor development in humans by NSAIDs ('aspirin effect').
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Marks
- German Cancer Research Center, Research Program Tumor Cell Regulation, Department 0235, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Balls M. Scientific Validation: A Crucial and Unavoidable Prerequisite to the Acceptability of New Tests and Testing Strategies. Altern Lab Anim 1995. [DOI: 10.1177/026119299502300409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
— The use of in vitro techniques in fundamental pharmacotoxicological research is widespread, but relatively little progress has been made in applying the knowledge and experience gained to regulatory toxicity testing. This is largely because specific tests of various kinds are required by national and international laws and regulations, before chemicals and products of many types can be manufactured, transported or marketed. These requirements have led to the publication of standardised test guidelines by various regulatory authorities. Although there is an increasing willingness to accept, in principle, the incorporation of non-animal tests and testing strategies into regulatory practice, their relevance and reliability must first be established in recognised validation studies, the outcomes of which must be assessed by independent groups of experts. The formal validation of alternative methods is not progressing satisfactorily. The reasons for this are discussed and some suggestions for improvements are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Balls
- ECVAM, JRC Environment Institute, 21020 Ispra (Va), Italy
| |
Collapse
|