The effect of repeat action albuterol sulfate (Proventil Repetabs) in nocturnal symptoms of asthma

Asthma: Chronopharmacotherapy and the molecular clock

Bronchial asthma is characterized by chronic airways inflammation and reversible airflow limitation. In patients with asthma, symptoms generally worsen during the early hours of the morning, and pulmonary function often deteriorates at the same time, suggesting a role for chronopharmacotherapy. Several drugs for asthma have been developed based on chronopharmacology. Most medications employed for the chronotherapy of asthma are administered once at night with the goal of preventing chronic airway inflammation or development of airflow limitation. In addition to bronchodilators, the inhaled glucocorticosteroid ciclesonide is now available with once-daily dosing, which also improves patients' compliance. Numerous investigations have demonstrated the usefulness of chronotherapy for asthma, especially for patients with nocturnal asthma. This review focuses on chronotherapy of asthma, and also provides a molecular biological explanation for the influence of asthma medications on the clock genes.

Chronobiology and chronotherapy of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma

Study of the chronobiology of allergic rhinitis (AR) and bronchial asthma (BA) and the chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of the medications used in their treatment began five decades ago. AR is an inflammatory disease of the upper airway tissue with hypersensitivity to specific environmental antigens, resulting in further local inflammation, vasomotor changes, and mucus hypersecretion. Symptoms include sneezing, nasal congestion, and runny and itchy nose. Approximately 25% of children and 40% of adults in USA are affected by AR during one or more seasons of the year. The manifestation and severity of AR symptoms exhibit prominent 24-h variation; in most persons they are worse overnight or early in the morning and often comprise nighttime sleep, resulting in poor daytime quality of life, compromised school and work performance, and irritability and moodiness. BA is also an inflammatory medical condition of the lower airways characterized by hypersensitivity to specific environmental antigens, resulting in greater local inflammation as well as bronchoconstriction, vasomotor change, and mucus hypersecretion. In USA an estimated 6.5 million children and 15.7 million adults have BA. The onset and worsening of BA are signaled by chest wheeze and/or croupy cough and difficult and labored breathing. Like AR, BA is primarily a nighttime medical condition. AR is treated with H1-antagonist, decongestant, and anti-inflammatory (glucocorticoid and leukotriene receptor antagonist and modifier) medications. Only H1-antagonist AR medications have been studied for their chronopharmacology and potential chronotherapy. BA is treated with some of the same medications and also theophylline and beta2-agonists. The chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of many classes of BA medications have been explored. This article reviews the rather extensive knowledge of the chronobiology of AR and BA and the chronopharmacology and chronotherapy of the various medications used in their treatment.

Nocturnal asthma uncontrolled by inhaled corticosteroids: theophylline or long-acting beta2 agonists?

Asthma is an inflammatory disease of the airways that is frequently characterised by marked circadian rhythm. Nocturnal and early morning symptoms are quite common among patients with asthma. Increased mortality and decreased quality of life are associated with nocturnal asthma. Although numerous mechanisms contribute to the pathophysiology of nocturnal asthma, increasing evidence suggests the most important mechanisms relate to airway inflammation. According to international guidelines, patients with persistent asthma should receive long term daily anti-inflammatory therapy. A therapeutic trial with anti-inflammatory therapy alone (without a long-acting bronchodilator) should be assessed to determine if this therapy will eliminate nocturnal and early morning symptoms. If environmental control and low to moderate doses of inhaled corticosteroids do not eliminate nocturnal symptoms, the addition of a long-acting bronchodilator is warranted. Long-acting inhaled beta2 agonists (e.g. salmeterol, formoterol) are effective in managing nocturnal asthma that is inadequately controlled by anti-inflammatory agents. In addition, sustained release theophylline and controlled release oral beta2 agonists are effective. In patients with nocturnal symptoms despite low to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids, the addition of salmeterol has been demonstrated to be superior to doubling the inhaled corticosteroid dose. In trials comparing salmeterol with theophylline, 3 studies revealed salmeterol was superior to theophylline (as measured by e.g. morning peak expiratory flow, percent decrease in awakenings, and need for rescue salbutamol), whereas 2 studies found the therapies of equal efficacy. Studies comparing salmeterol to oral long-acting beta2 agonists reveal salmeterol to be superior to terbutaline and equivalent in efficacy to other oral agents. Microarousals unrelated to asthma are consistently increased when theophylline is compared to salmeterol in laboratory sleep studies. In addition to efficacy data, clinicians must weigh benefits and risks in choosing therapy for nocturnal asthma. Long-acting inhaled beta2 agonists are generally well tolerated. If theophylline therapy is to be used safely, clinicians must be quite familiar with numerous factors that alter clearance of this drug, and they must be prepared to use appropriate doses and monitor serum concentrations. Comparative studies using validated, disease specific quality of life instruments (e.g. Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) have shown long-acting inhaled beta2 agonists are preferred to other long-acting bronchodilators. Examination of costs for these therapeutic options reveals that evening only doses of long-acting oral bronchodilators are less expensive than multiple inhaled doses. However, costs of monitoring serum concentrations, risks, quality of life and otheroutcome measures must also be considered. Long-acting inhaled beta2 agonists are the agents of choice for managing nocturnal asthma in patients who are symptomatic despite anti-inflammatory agents and other standard management (e.g. environmental control). These agents offer a high degree of efficacy along with a good margin of safety and improved quality of life.

Circadian rhythms in the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of beta-agonist, theophylline, and anticholinergic medications in the treatment of nocturnal asthma

Published asthma consensus reports now acknowledge that asthma is a nocturnal disease in as many as 75% of those afflicted by this medical condition. Nonetheless, the treatment of this chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the clinic continues to be based primarily on homeostatic considerations in that it relies on long-acting bronchodilator and other therapies formulated and scheduled to ensure constant or near-constant levels of medication during the 24h. The need of asthma patients prone to nighttime attacks is not the same during the day and night; the therapeutic requirements of patients who experience nocturnal asthma, especially ones with the more severe forms of the disease, are often not satisfied by conventional medications. The therapeutic response and patient tolerance to bronchodilator medications can be improved markedly when the medications are proportioned during the 24h as a chronotherapy, that is, when more medication is delivered during nighttime sleep than daytime activity, as verified by numerous studies. This article reviews how the body's circadian rhythms influence the pharmacokinetics and effects of commonly prescribed asthma therapies and addresses why and how they must be taken into consideration to increase the effectiveness of asthma treatment.

Salmeterol versus theophylline in the treatment of asthma

BACKGROUND

Although theophylline is recommended by current guidelines for the management of asthma in patients with persistent symptoms, theophylline has a narrow therapeutic index, requiring individual dose titration and regular monitoring of serum theophylline concentrations to avoid adverse effects.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the inhaled long-acting bronchodilator, salmeterol, with the oral bronchodilator, theophylline, in the maintenance treatment of asthma.

METHODS

In two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies, patients received salmeterol aerosol 42 micrograms, extended-release theophylline capsules, or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 638 adult and adolescent patients with moderate asthma who entered the prebaseline theophylline titration period, 154 were withdrawn prior to randomization (71 due to theophylline-related adverse effects); 484 patients comprised the intent-to-treat population. The mean serum theophylline concentration measured approximately seven hours postdose during the titration period in the theophylline group was 12.7 mg/L (70 mumol/L). The same dose during the treatment period resulted in a mean serum theophylline concentration between 7.6 to 7.9 mg/L (42-44 mumol/L) when measured approximately 12 hours postdose. Salmeterol was significantly more effective than theophylline or placebo in improving mean morning PEF over the entire 12 weeks (P < or = .02). Mean predose FEV1 improved significantly with salmeterol compared with placebo (P < .001); there was no difference between theophylline and placebo. Salmeterol was also significantly more effective than theophylline or placebo (P < .02) in improving asthma symptoms, reducing nighttime awakenings, and reducing the daily use of albuterol. After 12 weeks of treatment, patients in the salmeterol group expressed significantly greater overall satisfaction with their asthma medication than did patients who received theophylline (P < .01). Patients in the theophylline group experienced more gastrointestinal adverse events than did patients in the salmeterol group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Salmeterol, 42 mg twice daily, was better tolerated and significantly more effective than extended-release theophylline twice daily in the maintenance treatment of asthma.

Extended-release albuterol in the treatment of 6- to 12-year-old asthmatic children

BACKGROUND

Albuterol sulfate, in the syrup and tablet form for oral administration, has been an effective treatment for adults and children with bronchial asthma. Extended-release albuterol sulfate tablets (Proventil Repetabs, Schering Corp.) provide a convenient, twice-daily dosing regimen, but are indicated only for patients > or = 12 years of age.

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to determine whether patients 6 to 12 years of age could be effectively and safely treated with extended-release albuterol tablets.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of 157 patients in five centers. Patients were randomized to 4 weeks' treatment with extended-release albuterol tablets, 4 mg twice daily (q 12h), increasing up to 12 mg q 12h, or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs), physician and patient evaluations, and data collected from patients' diaries on PEFR, asthma symptoms, number of nighttime awakenings, and number of tablets taken. The primary efficacy parameter was area under the curve (AUC) for FEV1, evaluated for 8 to 12 hours post-dosing. Safety was evaluated based on vital signs, electrocardiograms, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Mean AUCs for FEV1 were significantly greater in the albuterol group at days 1 and 8 (P < or = .03). The albuterol group showed consistently lower severity scores for asthma symptoms. Physicians' and patients' global evaluations favored the albuterol group over the placebo group. No serious, treatment-related adverse events were reported. There were no clinically meaningful changes from baseline in either treatment group for vital signs or electrocardiograms.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended-release albuterol tablets (4 mg), administered to children 6 to 12 years old in divided doses of up to 24 mg/day, improved pulmonary function and asthmatic symptoms and were well tolerated.

Treatment of nocturnal asthma by addition of oral slow-release albuterol to standard treatment in stable asthma patients

Nocturnal and early-morning complaints in asthma patients are sometimes difficult to treat. We investigated the efficacy of an oral osmotically controlled release (OR) formulation of albuterol 8 mg in 35 patients with stable asthma and nocturnal complaints and/or morning dipping of the peak expiratory flow (PEF). The mean age was 45 years (range 22-70), the FEV(1) was 61 +/- 20% of predicted, and inhaled steroids were used by 32 patients. Albuterol OR was added to their usual treatment. The use of theophyllines and oral adrenergics was not allowed. Twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosing was compared to one dose at night and to placebo. The three-period crossover study was double-blind placebo-controlled with treatment periods of 2 weeks. Responses have been analyzed by means of multiple regression analysis at a significance level of 5%. There was no significant difference of the FEV(1) or the weekly means of PEFs between the periods. During the b.i.d. treatment, the daytime and nocturnal symptom scores, used rescue medication, subjective sleep quality, and nocturnal waking tended to be better. Mental fitness was improved, but significantly only in the morning. We concluded that additional treatment with albuterol 8 mg OR once or twice daily did not lead to an overall clinical improvement in this group of patients with nocturnal asthma during standard treatment. In view of the tendency to improvement, it may be worth trying this treatment in individual patients.