Rectal cancer radiotherapy: towards European consensus

Colorectal cancer treatment guidelines and shared decision making quality and reporting assessment: Systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Physicians must share decisions and choose personalised treatments regarding patients´ beliefs and values.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the quality of the recommendations about shared decision making (SDM) in colorectal (CRC) and anal cancer treatment clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs).

METHODS

Guidelines were systematically reviewed following prospective registration (Prospero: CRD42021286146) without language restrictions searching 15 databases and 59 professional society websites from January 2010 to November 2021. A validated 31-item SDM quality assessment tool was employed to extract data in duplicate.

RESULTS

We identified 134 guidelines. Only 46/134 (34.3 %) mentioned SDM. Fifteen (11.1 %) made clear, precise and actionable recommendations, while 9/134 (6.7 %) indicated the strength of the SDM-related recommendations. CPGs underpinned by systematic reviews reported SDM more often than those based on consensus or reviews (35.9 % vs 32.0 %; p = 0.031). Guidelines that reported following quality tools (i.e., AGREE II) more commonly commented about SDM than when it was not reported (75.0 % vs 32.0 %; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Most of the CRC and anal treatment guidelines did not mention SDM and it was superficial. Guidelines based on systematic reviews and those using quality tools demonstrated better reporting of SDM. Recommendations about SDM in these guidelines merit urgent improvement.

Downsizing of rectal cancer following neoadjuvant radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) and long interval surgery evaluated using MRI semiautomated volumetric measurements, a retrospective study

Introduction

Neoadjuvant conventional chemoradiation (CRT) is the standard treatment for primary locally non-curatively resectable rectal cancer, as tumor downsizing may allow R0 resectability. Short-term neoadjuvant radiotherapy (5x5 Gy) followed by an interval before surgery (SRT- delay) is an alternative for multimorbid patients who cannot tolerate CRT. This study examined the extent of tumor downsizing achieved with the SRT-delay approach in a limited cohort that underwent complete re-staging before surgery.

Methods

Between March 2018 and July 2021, 26 patients with locally advanced primary adenocarcinoma (>uT3 or/and N+) of the rectum were treated with SRT-delay. 22 patients underwent initial staging and complete re-staging (CT, endoscopy, MRI). Tumor downsizing was assessed by staging and re-staging data and pathologic findings. Semiautomated measurement of tumor volume was performed using mint Lesion™ 1.8 software to evaluate tumor regression.

Results

The mean tumor diameter determined on sagittal T2 MRI images decreased significantly from 54.1 (23-78) mm at initial staging to 37.9 (18-65) mm at re-staging before surgery (p <0.001) and to 25.5 (7-58) mm at pathologic examination (p <0.001). This corresponds to a mean reduction in tumor diameter of 28.9 (4.3-60.7) % at re-staging and 51.1 (8.7-86.5) % at pathology. Mean tumor volume determined from transverse T2 MR images mint Lesion^TM 1.8 software significantly decreased from 27.5 (9.8 - 89.6) cm³ at initial staging to 13.1 (3.7 - 32.8) cm³ at re-staging (p <0.001), corresponding to a mean reduction of 50.8 (21.6 - 77) %. The frequency of positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) (less than 1mm) decreased from 45,5 % (10 patients) at initial staging to 18,2 % (4 patients) at re-staging. On pathologic examination, the CRM was negative in all cases. However, multivisceral resection for T4 tumors was required in 2 patients (9%). Tumor downstaging was noted in 15 of 22 patients after SRT-delay.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the observed extent of downsizing is broadly comparable to the results of CRT, making SRT-delay a serious alternative for patients who cannot tolerate chemotherapy.

Electronic self-reporting of adverse events for patients undergoing cancer treatment: the eRAPID research programme including two RCTs

Background

Cancer is treated using multiple modalities (e.g. surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapies) and is frequently associated with adverse events that affect treatment delivery and quality of life. Regular adverse event reporting could improve care and safety through timely detection and management. Information technology provides a feasible monitoring model, but applied research is needed. This research programme developed and evaluated an electronic system, called eRAPID, for cancer patients to remotely self-report adverse events.

Objectives

The objectives were to address the following research questions: is it feasible to collect adverse event data from patients’ homes and in clinics during cancer treatment? Can eRAPID be implemented in different hospitals and treatment settings? Will oncology health-care professionals review eRAPID reports for decision-making? When added to usual care, will the eRAPID intervention (i.e. self-reporting with tailored advice) lead to clinical benefits (e.g. better adverse event control, improved patient safety and experiences)? Will eRAPID be cost-effective?

Design

Five mixed-methods work packages were conducted, incorporating co-design with patients and health-care professionals: work package 1 – development and implementation of the electronic platform across hospital centres; work package 2 – development of patient-reported adverse event items and advice (systematic and scoping reviews, patient interviews, Delphi exercise); work package 3 – mapping health-care professionals and care pathways; work package 4 – feasibility pilot studies to assess patient and clinician acceptability; and work package 5 – a single-centre randomised controlled trial of systemic treatment with a full health economic assessment.

Setting

The setting was three UK cancer centres (in Leeds, Manchester and Bristol).

Participants

The intervention was developed and evaluated with patients and clinicians. The systemic randomised controlled trial included 508 participants who were starting treatment for breast, colorectal or gynaecological cancer and 55 health-care professionals. The radiotherapy feasibility pilot recruited 167 patients undergoing treatment for pelvic cancers. The surgical feasibility pilot included 40 gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Intervention

eRAPID is an online system that allows patients to complete adverse event/symptom reports from home or hospital. The system provides immediate severity-graded advice based on clinical algorithms to guide self-management or hospital contact. Adverse event data are transferred to electronic patient records for review by clinical teams. Patients complete an online symptom report every week and whenever they experience symptoms.

Main outcome measures

In systemic treatment, the primary outcome was Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General, Physical Well-Being score assessed at 6, 12 and 18 weeks (primary end point). Secondary outcomes included cost-effectiveness assessed through the comparison of health-care costs and quality-adjusted life-years. Patient self-efficacy was measured (using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Diseases 6-item Scale). The radiotherapy pilot studied feasibility (recruitment and attrition rates) and selection of outcome measures. The surgical pilot examined symptom report completeness, system actions, barriers to using eRAPID and technical performance.

Results

eRAPID was successfully developed and introduced across the treatments and centres. The systemic randomised controlled trial found no statistically significant effect of eRAPID on the primary end point at 18 weeks. There was a significant effect at 6 weeks (adjusted difference least square means 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 2.05; p = 0.028) and 12 weeks (adjusted difference least square means 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.05 to 1.98; p = 0.0395). No between-arm differences were found for admissions or calls/visits to acute oncology or chemotherapy delivery. Health economic analyses over 18 weeks indicated no statistically significant difference between the cost of the eRAPID information technology system and the cost of usual care (£12.28, 95% confidence interval –£1240.91 to £1167.69; p > 0.05). Mean differences were small, with eRAPID having a 55% probability of being cost-effective at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-recommended cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Patient self-efficacy was greater in the intervention arm (0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.83; p = 0.0073). Qualitative interviews indicated that many participants found eRAPID useful for support and guidance. Patient adherence to adverse-event symptom reporting was good (median compliance 72.2%). In the radiotherapy pilot, high levels of consent (73.2%) and low attrition rates (10%) were observed. Patient quality-of-life outcomes indicated a potential intervention benefit in chemoradiotherapy arms. In the surgical pilot, 40 out of 91 approached patients (44%) consented. Symptom report completion rates were high. Across the studies, clinician intervention engagement was varied. Both patient and staff feedback on the value of eRAPID was positive.

Limitations

The randomised controlled trial methodology led to small numbers of patients simultaneously using the intervention, thus reducing overall clinician exposure to and engagement with eRAPID. Furthermore, staff saw patients across both arms, introducing a contamination bias and potentially reducing the intervention effect. The health economic results were limited by numbers of missing data (e.g. for use of resources and EuroQol-5 Dimensions).

Conclusions

This research provides evidence that online symptom monitoring with inbuilt patient advice is acceptable to patients and clinical teams. Evidence of patient benefit was found, particularly during the early phases of treatment and in relation to self-efficacy. The findings will help improve the intervention and guide future trial designs.

Future work

Definitive trials in radiotherapy and surgical settings are suggested. Future research during systemic treatments could study self-report online interventions to replace elements of traditional follow-up care in the curative setting. Further research during modern targeted treatments (e.g. immunotherapy and small-molecule oral therapy) and in metastatic disease is recommended.

Trial registration

The systemic randomised controlled trial is registered as ISRCTN88520246. The radiotherapy trial is registered as ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02747264.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 10, No. 1. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Radiomic Features of Primary Rectal Cancers on Baseline T2 -Weighted MRI Are Associated With Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: A Multisite Study

BACKGROUND

Twenty-five percent of rectal adenocarcinoma patients achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation and could avoid proctectomy. However, pretreatment clinical or imaging markers are lacking in predicting response to chemoradiation. Radiomic texture features from MRI have recently been associated with therapeutic response in other cancers.

PURPOSE

To construct a radiomics texture model based on pretreatment MRI for identifying patients who will achieve pCR to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer, including validation across multiple scanners and sites.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

In all, 104 rectal cancer patients staged with MRI prior to long-course chemoradiation followed by proctectomy; curated from three institutions.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

1.5T-3.0T, axial higher resolution T2 -weighted turbo spin echo sequence.

ASSESSMENT

Pathologic response was graded on postsurgical specimens. In total, 764 radiomic features were extracted from single-slice sections of rectal tumors on processed pretreatment T2 -weighted MRI.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Three feature selection schemes were compared for identifying radiomic texture descriptors associated with pCR via a discovery cohort (one site, N = 60, cross-validation). The top-selected radiomic texture features were used to train and validate a random forest classifier model for pretreatment identification of pCR (two external sites, N = 44). Model performance was evaluated via area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

Laws kernel responses and gradient organization features were most associated with pCR (P ≤ 0.01); as well as being commonly identified across all feature selection schemes. The radiomics model yielded a discovery AUC of 0.699 ± 0.076 and a hold-out validation AUC of 0.712 with 70.5% accuracy (70.0% sensitivity, 70.6% specificity) in identifying pCR. Radiomic texture features were resilient to variations in magnetic field strength as well as being consistent between two different expert annotations. Univariate analysis revealed no significant associations of baseline clinicopathologic or MRI findings with pCR (P = 0.07-0.96).

DATA CONCLUSION

Radiomic texture features from pretreatment MRIs may enable early identification of potential pCR to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, as well as generalize across sites.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinical Stage II to III Across European Countries: Variations and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy improves survival of patients with clinical stage II and III rectal cancer in clinical trials. In this study, we investigated the administration of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (neo-RT) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (neo-CRT) and its association with survival in resected patients in 2 European countries (The Netherlands and Sweden) and at 3 specialist centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Administration of neoadjuvant treatment (all registries) and overall survival after surgery in The Netherlands and Sweden were assessed. Hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained using Cox regression adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 16,095 rectal cancer patients with clinical stage II and III were eligible for analyses. Large variations in administration of neo-RT and neo-CRT were observed. Elderly patients less often received neo-RT and neo-CRT. Patients with stage III disease received neo-CRT more frequently than neo-RT. Administration of neo-RT versus surgery without neoadjuvant treatment was significantly associated with improved survival in The Netherlands (HR, 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.73) as well as in Sweden (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.69-0.90). Administration of neo-CRT was associated with enhanced survival in The Netherlands (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.78) but not in Sweden (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.80-1.18). The mortality of patients treated with neo-CRT compared with neo-RT showed inconsistent results in population-based centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support an association of neo-RT with enhanced survival among stage II and III rectal cancer patients. Comparing neo-CRT with neo-RT, larger variations and inconsistent results with respect to survival were observed across centers.

Identification of molecular characteristics induced by radiotherapy in rectal cancer based on microarray data

The present study aimed to reveal the molecular characteristics induced by radiotherapy in rectal cancer at the transcriptome level. Microarray data (ID, GSE26027) downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database were re-analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between rectal cancer tissues during and prior to radiotherapy. The DEGs were then inputted into the database for annotation, visualization and integrated discovery, an online tool to perform enrichment analyses, and into the search tool for the retrieval of interacting genes/proteins database to identify protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Subsequently, a PPI network was constructed, which was screened for densely connected modules. Furthermore, protein domain enrichment analysis was performed. In total, 690 DEGs, including 179 upregulated and 511 downregulated DEGs, were found in rectal cancer tissues during and prior to radiotherapy. The upregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in 'positive regulation of transport' and 'regulation of cardiac muscle contraction', while the downregulated DEGs were most markedly enriched in 'cell migration', 'cell-cell signaling', 'extracellular matrix organization' and 'blood vessel development', including prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2, transforming growth factor β-induced, 68 kDa endothelin receptor type A, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1, and serpin family E member 1, which were the top 6 hub nodes in the PPI network. Furthermore, 2 protein domains were significantly enriched by PPI modules, including: The collagen triple helix repeat (CTHR) family members collagen type (COL) 5A2, COL9A3, COL6A3, COL21A1, COL5A3, COL11A1, COL7A1 and CTHR-containing-1; and the olfactory receptor family (OR) members OR7E24, OR7A17, OR6A2, OR1F1, OR10H3 and OR7A10. A total of 7 upregulated DEGs were characterized as tumor suppressor genes, and 8 downregulated DEGs were characterized as oncogenes. The biological processes or protein domains enriched by upregulated or downregulated DEGs may improve the understanding of molecular characteristics in response to radiotherapy.

Preoperative Chemoradiation With VMAT-SIB in Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in preoperative combined treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

Radiation therapy was performed using the VMAT-SIB technique. The dose to mesorectum and pelvic lymph nodes was 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction). A concomitant boost was delivered on GTV + 2-cm margin with a total dose of 57.5 Gy (2.3 Gy/fraction). The following concomitant chemotherapy was administered: capecitabine (825 mg/m² twice daily, 5 days per week) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m² on days 1, 17, and 35). Efficacy was evaluated in terms of complete pathological response (pCR). Acute toxicities were evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients (7 women; median age 62 years; clinical stage: 4 local recurrences, 6 cT4, 5 cT3, 3 cT2, 2 cN0, 7 cN1, 9 cN2) were enrolled. Sixteen patients underwent surgical resection (9 low anterior resection, 6 abdominal perineal amputations; 1 transanal excision) and 2 patients did not undergo surgery for early metastatic progression or death from acute pulmonary edema. R0 resection was achieved in all patients who underwent surgery. Overall, 4 patients had a pCR and 7 patients only a microscopic residual of disease (pT0-Tmic: 11/18 = 61.1%; 95% CI, 36.2-86.1). Acute grade ≥ 3 toxicity was as follows: 1 case of leukopenia, 1 skin toxicity, 1 genitourinary toxicity, and 5 gastrointestinal toxicities, with an overall incidence of 8 (44.4%) of 18 patients. One-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative local control was 100%, 68.6%, and 68.6%, respectively. One-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative disease-free survival was 88.9%, 66.7%, and 66.7%, respectively. One-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative overall survival was 85%, 63.8%, and 63.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The regimen used in this study showed excellent results in terms of pathologic responses. However, despite the use of the VMAT technique, more than one-third of patients had severe acute toxicity.

Current approaches and challenges for monitoring treatment response in colon and rectal cancer

Introduction: With the advent of multidisciplinary and multimodality approaches to the management of colorectal cancer patients, there is an increasing need to define how we monitor response to novel therapies in these patients. Several factors ranging from the type of therapy used to the intrinsic biology of the tumor play a role in tumor response. All of these can aid in determining the ideal course of treatment, and may fluctuate over time, pending down-staging or progression of disease. Therefore, monitoring how disease responds to therapy requires standardization in order to ultimately optimize patient outcomes. Unfortunately, how best to do this remains a topic of debate among oncologists, pathologists, and colorectal surgeons. There may not be one single best approach. The goal of the present article is to shed some light on current approaches and challenges to monitoring treatment response for colorectal cancer.

Methods: A literature search was conducted utilizing PubMed and the OVID library. Key-word combinations included colorectal cancer metastases, neoadjuvant therapy, rectal cancer, imaging modalities, CEA, down-staging, tumor response, and biomarkers. Directed searches of the embedded references from the primary articles were also performed in selected circumstances.

Results: Pathologic examination of the post-treatment surgical specimen is the gold standard for monitoring response to therapy. Endoscopy is useful for evaluating local recurrence, but not in assessing tumor response outside of the limited information gained by direct examination of intra-lumenal lesions. Imaging is used to monitor tumors throughout the body for response, with CT, PET, and MRI employed in different circumstances. Overall, each has been validated in the monitoring of patients with colorectal cancer and residual tumors.

Conclusion: Although there is no imaging or serum test to precisely correlate with a tumor's response to chemo- or radiation therapy, these modalities, when used in combination, can aid in allowing clinicians to adjust medical therapy, pursue operative intervention, or (in select cases) identify complete responders. Improvements are needed, however, as advances across multiple modalities could allow appropriate selection of patients for a close surveillance regimen in the absence of operative intervention.

Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer

In rectal cancer treatment, attention has focused on the local primary tumour and the regional tumour cell deposits to diminish the risk of a loco-regional recurrence. Several large randomized trials have also shown that combinations of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have markedly reduced the risk of a loco-regional recurrence, but this has not yet had any major influence on overall survival. The best results have been achieved when the radiotherapy has been given preoperatively. Preoperative radiotherapy improves loco-regional control even when surgery has been optimized to improve lateral clearance, i.e., when a total mesorectal excision has been performed. The relative reduction is then 50%-70%. The value of radiotherapy has not been tested in combination with more extensive surgery including lateral lymph node clearance, as practised in some Asian countries. Many details about how the radiotherapy is performed are still open for discussion, and practice varies between countries. A highly fractionated radiation schedule (5 Gy × 5), proven efficacious in many trials, has gained much popularity in some countries, whereas a conventionally fractionated regimen (1.8-2.0 Gy × 25-28), often combined with chemotherapy, is used in other countries. The additional therapy adds morbidity to the morbidity that surgery causes, and should therefore be administered only when the risk of loco-regional recurrence is sufficiently high. The best integration of the weakest modality, to date the drugs (conventional cytotoxics and biologicals) is not known. A new generation of trials exploring the best sequence of treatments is required. Furthermore, there is a great need to develop predictors of response, so that treatment can be further individualized and not solely based upon clinical factors and anatomic imaging.

Integrated peripheral boost in preoperative radiotherapy for the locally most advanced non-resectable rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Few studies have explored the potential clinical advantages of dose escalation and integrated boosts for patients with non-resectable locally advanced rectal cancer. The possibility of escalating dose to non-resectable regions in these patients was the aim of this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven patients with locally very advanced rectal tumours (sacrum overgrowth or growth into pelvic side walls) were evaluated. Intensity modulated photon and pencil beam scanning proton plans with simultaneously integrated boosts (45 Gy to elective lymph nodes, 50 Gy to tumour and 62.5 Gy to boost area in 25 fractions) were compared.

RESULTS

Target coverage was achieved with both photon and proton plans. Estimated risks of acute side effects put the two patients with the largest tumours at unacceptable risk for intestinal toxicity, regardless of modality. The remaining five patients had beneficial sparing of dose to the small intestine with protons.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding boost to areas where rectal tumours infiltrate adjacent non-resectable organs is an attractive option which appears possible using both photon and proton irradiation. Proton plans reduced dose to organs at risk. Integrated peripheral boosts should be considered more frequently in these very advanced tumours.

Patients with rectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy have an increased survival: a population-based longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III rectal cancer varies between regions and over time, and if this has had an effect on survival rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from the Uppsala/Örebro region below 75 years-of-age, operated 1995-2002 and registered in the Swedish Rectal Cancer Register, were monitored between 1995 and September 2008. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for analysis. Overall survival was described using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Four hundred and thirty-six patients with stage III rectal cancer were included. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given to 42% of the patients (proportions varying from 13% to 77% among counties), and there were substantial increases over time. The 5-year overall survival was 65.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 50-84] for patients having adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 45.6% (95% CI 39-52) for patients not treated with chemotherapy. The multivariate hazard ratio for death was 0.65 (95% CI 0.5-0.8) for patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer has increased, but varies considerably between hospitals/counties. In this cohort, those having adjuvant chemotherapy had a longer overall survival.

Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with rectal cancer: Development during the past decades and plans for the future

In rectal cancer treatment, both the local primary and the regional and systemic tumour cell deposits must be taken care of in order to improve survival. The three main treatments, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, each with their own advantages and limitations, must then be combined to improve results. Several large randomized trials have shown that combinations of the modalities have markedly reduced the loco-regional recurrences, but have not yet had any major influence on overall survival. The best integration of the weakest modality, to date the drugs (conventional cytotoxics and biologicals), is not known. A new generation of trials exploring the best sequence of treatments is required. Furthermore, treatment of rectal cancer is administered to populations of individuals, based upon clinical factors and imaging, and can presently not be further individualized. There is an urgent need to develop response predictors.

Management of local rectal cancer: evidence, controversies and future perspectives in radiotherapy

SUMMARY Rectal cancer comprises approximately 25% of all primary colorectal cancers. The optimal diagnostic and treatment approach for this heterogeneous malignancy is still contentious, and improvements in general multidisciplinary management are required. During recent years a number of randomized studies led by European investigators have shown optimization in preoperative staging, improvements in surgical technique and the histopathological assessment of the resected specimen, and the benefit of combined modality treatment. The main recommendations and the trends in research on radiotherapy and integrated treatments will be summarized with an overview on some relevant points about imaging and pathological staging.

High-dose radiotherapy (60 Gy) with oral UFT/folinic acid and escalating doses of oxaliplatin in patients with non-resectable locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): a phase I trial

BACKGROUND

Consensus is that patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) should receive long-term chemoradiotherapy (CRT) before surgery. With the intent to offer the patients intensified concomitant chemotherapy (CT) to improve outcome and to assess tolerability and toxicity of oxaliplatin (Ox) a phase I trial of high dose pelvic radiotherapy (RT), fixed dose of oral UFT/l-leucovorin and increasing doses of weekly Ox were performed.

METHODS

Pelvic RT with 48.6 Gy/27 fractions was given to the primary tumour and the regional lymph nodes and a concurrent boost of 5.4 Gy/27 fractions with a final boost of 6 Gy/3 fractions was given to the gross tumour volume (GTV) (60 Gy/30 fractions). Concurrent with RT patients received a daily dose of UFT 300 mg/m(2) plus fixed dose l-leucovorin 22.5 mg 5/7 days and increasing weekly doses of Ox with 10 mg/m(2)/week from a start dose of 30 mg/m(2)/week to a maximum of 60 mg/m(2)/week. In addition, before and after CRT the patients received one course of TEGAFOX (UFT 300 mg/m(2) with l/leucovorin 22.5 mg Days 1-14 and Ox 130 mg/m(2) given on Day 1). Surgery was planned at least six weeks after the completion of the CRT.

RESULTS

From May 2005 to March 2009, 18 patients with LARC (16 primary, two recurrent) were included in this phase I trial. Toxicity was low with only 5-17% grade 3-4 toxicity. Fifteen patients (83%) were operated (14 R0 resection and 1 R1 resection) after completion of CRT. Five (33%) patients had a pathological complete response (ypCR). When ypCR was combined with yp few residual cells, the rate was 60%. Thirteen patients are still alive December 2011.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative high-dose RT and concomitant UFT with increasing doses of Ox up to 60 mg/m(2)/week was feasible with low toxicity, high ypCR rates and promising OS in patients with non-resectable LARC.

Characterisation of rectal motion during neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer with image-guided tomotherapy: implications for adaptive dose escalation strategies

BACKGROUND

Interest in boosting the dose to the tumour during neo-adjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer is ever increasing, especially within the frame of adaptive radiotherapy. Rectal motion remains a potentially important obstacle to the full exploitation of this approach and needs to be carefully investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The main purposes of this work were to: a) quantify rectal motion on all fractions of a treatment course; and b) assess margins for adaptive boosting in the second part of the treatment in order to benefit of tumour reduction during treatment. Ten consecutive patients treated with image-guided tomotherapy (41.4 Gy, 18 fractions) were selected. The cranial half of the rectum (subject to motion) was contoured by a single observer on daily MVCTs. The variations of rectal volume and of the envelope of rectum positions were investigated (169 MVCTs). The impact of applying different margins to the rectum in including all its possible positions was also investigated when considering the planning kVCT, the first fraction MVCT, the half-treatment MVCT or the median rectal contours of the whole or second half of treatment as reference volumes.

RESULTS

Rectal volume reduced during treatment in all patients, with a significant time-trend in 6/10 patients. The median values of the envelope volumes were 129 cm(3) and 87 cm(3) in the first and second half of the treatment, respectively. On average, 95% of the rectal envelope was included by an isotropic expansion of 12 mm and 5 mm of the median contours when considering the whole or the second half of the treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A significant reduction of rectal volume was found in the second part of the treatment where rectal mobility was limited. As a consequence, relatively small margins may be used around the residual tumour volume when adaptive boost is delivered in the second half of the treatment.

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy with delayed surgery in primary rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Short-course radiotherapy (SRT) with immediate surgery and long-course chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are currently the standard preoperative treatment options for rectal cancer. SRT with surgery delayed for 4-8 weeks (SRT-delay) is an option described for patients with locally advanced tumours who are not fit for CRT. This study examined early toxicity, response to radiotherapy (RT) and short-term outcomes of SRT-delay.

METHODS

Patients in the Stockholm region diagnosed with rectal cancer between January 2002 and December 2008, who received SRT (25 Gy over 5-7 days) and had surgery with resection of the primary tumour more than 4 weeks after the start of RT, were identified from a prospective register. Additional data were obtained by retrospective review of clinical records.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients had SRT and delayed surgery. The reasons given for SRT included primary unresectable disease and co-morbidities. Severe RT-induced toxicity was noted in six patients (5·4 per cent). Signs of tumour regression were seen on magnetic resonance imaging in 74 per cent of patients reassessed after RT. Pathological stage (44·9 versus 60·7 per cent stage 0-II; P < 0·001), tumour category (11·9 versus 29·4 per cent T0-T2; P < 0·001) and node category (45·8 versus 63·6 per cent N0; P = 0·014) were significantly lower than those at initial assessment. Nine patients (8·0 per cent) had a complete pathological response.

CONCLUSION

The SRT-delay schedule was a feasible alternative with low toxicity. The study indicated a downstaging effect of SRT if surgery was delayed.

Neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer: actual status

Neoadjuvant (preoperative) concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has become a standard treatment of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas. The clinical stages II (cT3-4, N0, M0) and III (cT1-4, N+, M0) according to International Union Against Cancer (IUCC) are concerned. It can reduce tumor volume and subsequently lead to an increase in complete resections (R0 resections), shows less toxicity, and improves local control rate. The aim of this review is to summarize actual approaches, main problems, and discrepancies in the treatment of locally advanced rectal adenocarcinomas.

The effects of short-course preoperative irradiation on local recurrence rate and survival in rectal cancer: a population-based nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Preoperative irradiation with 5 × 5 Gy in randomized trials reduces local recurrence rate and may improve survival in patients with resectable rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine whether the same favorable effects could be observed in a population-based study.

DESIGN

This study was conducted via a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry.

SETTINGS

This study examined population-based data from Sweden.

PATIENTS

All newly diagnosed rectal cancers in Sweden are reported to the Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry.

INTERVENTIONS

Between 1995 and 2001, 6878 patients (stages I-III) were operated on with an anterior resection, an abdominoperineal resection, or a Hartmann's procedure. Short-course irradiation was given to 41% of patients preoperatively. To reduce bias, patients operated on with a Hartmann procedure or older than 75 years were excluded when 5-year survival was analyzed (n = 3466). Tumors were analyzed according to height (0-5 cm, 6-10 cm, 11-15 cm).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Five-year cumulative local recurrence and survival rates.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative local recurrence rate was 6.3% (95% CI 5.4-7.4) for patients receiving preoperative irradiation and 12.1% (95% CI 10.8-13.5) for patients not receiving preoperative irradiation. Multivariate analyses indicated the risk of local recurrence was 50% lower for patients receiving preoperative irradiation compared with patients not receiving irradiation (hazard ratio = 0.50; 95% CI 0.40-0.62). Among patients younger than 76 years and operated on with an anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection, the 5-year cumulative survival rate was 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.72). Disease-free and overall survivals were higher in irradiated patients, and the difference was statistically significant in low tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population-based analysis, the favorable effect of preoperative short-course irradiation on local recurrence rates, seen in randomized trials, was confirmed for the entire Swedish population irrespective of tumor height and stage. Data also suggested an effect on 5-year survival, especially in patients with low tumors (0-5 cm).

Achieving consensus in follow-up practice for routine ENT procedures: a Delphi exercise

OBJECTIVES

To generate consensus amongst faculty members regarding follow-up practice for well-defined clinical scenarios using a Delphi exercise and to identify whether disseminating the consensus guidelines changed follow-up practice.

STUDY DESIGN

Generation of consensus using a Delphi exercise and an audit of follow-up practice before and after dissemination of the resultant guidelines.

SETTING

The department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at the Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Panel members for this exercise included 11 consultants and two associate specialists and one co-ordinator. We identified clinical scenarios where ≥ 80% agreement existed that routine follow-up appointments should not be made and subsequently disseminated guidelines widely to all medical staff. The follow-up rates for the scenarios where consensus existed regarding follow-up practice were audited from clinic letters before and after the guidelines were disseminated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Agreement on scenarios where routine follow-up appointments should not be made was assessed using a Likert scale (1-5).

RESULTS

Of 13 faculty members, 12 responded to rounds one and two, and 11 responded to round three. The Delphi exercise identified 18 clinical scenarios where there was ≥ 80% agreement on patients not routinely being followed up. Comparison of the follow-up practice prior to and after the Delphi exercise identified a reduction in follow-up for all 18 scenarios of 48%.

CONCLUSION

Consensus regarding routine follow-up can be reached by using the Delphi process in ENT practice. This can translate into a real change in clinical practice. Furthermore, this process could be applied for consensus building in other related areas.