1
|
Nielsen AWM, Thorsen LB, Özcan D, Matthiessen LW, Maae E, Milo ML, Nielsen MH, Tramm T, Overgaard J, Offersen BV. Internal mammary node irradiation in 4541 node-positive breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based radiotherapy (DBCG IMN2): a prospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. EUROPE 2025; 49:101160. [PMID: 39810969 PMCID: PMC11732476 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
Background Internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) improves overall survival (OS) in node-positive breast cancer patients. However, the effect is not documented in breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based radiotherapy (RT). Therefore, the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) IMN2 study aimed to investigate the effect of IMNI in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based RT. Methods DBCG IMN2 was a nationwide population-based cohort study prospectively allocating node-positive breast cancer patients with right-sided tumours to IMNI and patients with left-sided tumours to no IMNI in six RT centres. Exclusion criteria were prior malignancies, bilateral breast cancer, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, recurrence before RT, or non-standard RT. Systemic treatment included taxane-based chemotherapy, aromatase inhibitors, and trastuzumab. The primary end-point was OS. Secondary endpoints were breast cancer mortality and distant metastasis. Cox regression analyses were used for adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Clinicaltrial.gov ID: NCT06549920. Findings In the period January 2007-May 2014, a total of 4541 patients were included. Patient characteristics were distributed evenly between right- and left-sided patients. Median follow-up was 13.7 years for OS. Survival rates at 15 years were 65.0% in patients with IMNI and 60.8% without leading to an adjusted HR of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.76-0.94; p = 0.0016) for OS. Corresponding HRs were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74-0.95; p = 0.0077) for breast cancer mortality and HR 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98; p = 0.026) for distant metastasis. No subgroups were identified for the omission of IMNI. The 15-year cumulative incidence of death from ischemic or valvular heart disease was 0.2% (95% CI, 0.0-0.5) in right-sided and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.4-1.2) in left-sided patients. Interpretation IMNI reduced distant metastasis and breast cancer mortality and improved OS in node-positive breast cancer patients, despite treatment with newer systemic therapies and 3D-based RT. Funding This work was supported by the Danish Cancer Society and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anders W. Mølby Nielsen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lise B.J. Thorsen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Demet Özcan
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Louise W. Matthiessen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Else Maae
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Marie L.H. Milo
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mette H. Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Trine Tramm
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgitte V. Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - DBCG RT Committee
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Refsgaard L, Buhl ES, Nielsen AWM, Thomsen MS, Andersen K, Jensen I, Berg M, Lorenzen EL, Thorsen LBJ, Overgaard J, Korreman SS, Offersen BV. Quality assurance of internal mammary node irradiation in the DBCG IMN2 study. Radiother Oncol 2025; 202:110600. [PMID: 39521277 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Revised: 09/30/2024] [Accepted: 10/24/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE The Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) IMN2 study investigated the gain from internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) in node-positive breast cancer patients. IMNI was indicated in right-sided patients, but not in left-sided. Target volume delineations were based on bony landmarks in contrast to the contemporary vessel-based ESTRO consensus guideline. Our objective was to compare IMNI doses in right-sided versus left-sided patients. MATERIAL/METHODS Treatment plans and delineated structures including CTVn_IMN (IMN_old) from 2008 to 2014 were collected from the DBCG RT Nation study. During the study period, IMN_old was only delineated in right-sided patients. Right and left-sided CTVn_IMN structures were auto-segmented following the ESTRO guidelines (IMN_ESTRO). Due to cranial discordance between IMN_old and IMN_ESTRO, the IMN_ESTRO models were separated into IMN_ESTRO_cranial and IMN_ESTRO_intercostal space(IC)1-3, IC1-4, and IC4_only. RESULTS Treatment plans for 2837 patients were available (62.5 % of patients in the IMN2 study). In right-sided patients, the median IMN_old dose coverage (92.4 %) was higher than IMN_ESTRO (71.7 %), p < 0.001. Dose coverage in IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3 was comparable to IMN_old. Comparing IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3 in all patients by laterality, the median CTVn_V90% was 94.6 % (IQR 64.8-100.0) in right-sided patients and 20.4 % (IQR 0.9-55.8) in left-sided patients, p < 0.001. For right-sided patients, median CTV_V90% was 82.3 % in IMN_ESTRO_IC4_only. Median mean heart doses were lower in right-sided patients (1.2 Gy) than in left-sided (2.3 Gy), p < 0.001. Median mean lung doses were higher in right-sided patients (16.0 Gy) than in left-sided (12.7 Gy), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION For IMN_ESTRO_IC1-3, we found a significantly higher IMN dose coverage in right-sided than in left-sided patients supporting treatment according to study guidelines in the DBCG IMN2 study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasse Refsgaard
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Emma S Buhl
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anders W Mølby Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Mette S Thomsen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karen Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ingelise Jensen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Martin Berg
- Department of Medical Physics, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Ebbe L Lorenzen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lise B J Thorsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Stine S Korreman
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Siman-Tov M, Ostrovski A, Mast M, Struikmans H, Bogers L, Fortpied C, Hol S, Petoukhova A, van Egmond J, Poortmans P, Kaidar-Person O. Dosimetric Analyses of the Three Radiation Techniques Used in the EORTC 22922/10925 IM-MS Breast Cancer Trial. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2024; 36:690-700. [PMID: 39261237 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the current study is to compare the dosimetry of 3 radiation therapy (RT) techniques used in the EORTC 22922/10925 trial for irradiating the internal mammary (IM) and medial supraclavicular nodes (MS) using a treatment planning system available nowadays for dose calculation. METHODS We performed a retrospective dosimetry analysis of anonymised data; thus, ethics approval was not required. Ten cases of left-sided breast were randomly selected for RT planning to a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The treatment planning was done according to the trial's protocol and under the supervision of the EORTC trial's coordinators. Doses to planning target volumes (PTV) and to organs at risk (OARs) are reported. Data is presented in descriptive statistics. RESULTS A total of 10 cases and 40 treatment plans (4 plans per case: standard-plan A, modified standard-plan B, individualised-plan C and breast-only-plan D). For all planning techniques, the mean dose to the PTV of the left breast (plan A-D) and the PTV-MS (plan A-C) exceeded 95% of the prescribed dose (>47.5 Gy). The individualised technique (plan C) had a lower coverage for PTV-IM, with a mean of 87% of the prescribed dose compared to ∼102% for plans A and B. The dose to OARs varied between techniques, with the mean heart dose being higher in the standard and modified standard techniques (18.3 and 16.6 Gy, respectively) compared to the individualised technique (9.5 Gy). CONCLUSIONS The 3 RT techniques used in the trial varied in target coverage and OARs dose. Our results may help to understand the observed larger absolute benefit of individualised IM-MS treatment planning in terms of breast cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Siman-Tov
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - A Ostrovski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - M Mast
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - H Struikmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - L Bogers
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - C Fortpied
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Hol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - A Petoukhova
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - J van Egmond
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leidschendam, The Netherlands
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - O Kaidar-Person
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology or GROW (Maastro), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Refsgaard L, Skarsø Buhl E, Yates E, Maae E, Berg M, Al-Rawi S, Saini A, Vestmø Maraldo M, Boye K, Louise Holm Milo M, Jensen I, Wichmann Matthiessen L, Nørring Bekke S, Holck Nielsen M, Laugaard Lorenzen E, Bech Jellesmark Thorsen L, Sofia Korreman S, Vrou Offersen B. Evaluating Danish Breast Cancer Group locoregional radiotherapy guideline adherence in clinical treatment data 2008-2016: The DBCG RT Nation study. Radiother Oncol 2024; 199:110289. [PMID: 38944554 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Guideline adherence in radiotherapy is crucial for maintaining treatment quality and consistency, particularly in non-trial patient settings where most treatments occur. The study aimed to assess the impact of guideline changes on treatment planning practices and compare manual registry data accuracy with treatment planning data. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study utilised the DBCG RT Nation cohort, a collection of breast cancer radiotherapy data in Denmark, to evaluate adherence to guidelines from 2008 to 2016. The cohort included 7448 high-risk breast cancer patients. National guideline changes included, fractionation, introduction of respiratory gating, irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes, use of the simultaneous integrated boost technique and inclusion of the Left Anterior Descending coronary artery in delineation practice. Methods for structure name mapping, laterality detection, detection of temporal changes in population mean lung volume, and dose evaluation were presented and applied. Manually registered treatment characteristic data was obtained from the Danish Breast Cancer Database for comparison. RESULTS The study found immediate and consistent adherence to guideline changes across Danish radiotherapy centres. Treatment practices before guideline implementation were documented and showed a variation among centres. Discrepancies between manual registry data and actual treatment planning data were as high as 10% for some measures. CONCLUSION National guideline changes could be detected in the routine treatment data, with a high degree of compliance and short implementation time. Data extracted from treatment planning data files provides a more accurate and detailed characterisation of treatments and guideline adherence than medical register data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasse Refsgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Emma Skarsø Buhl
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Esben Yates
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Else Maae
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Martin Berg
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Denmark
| | - Sami Al-Rawi
- Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Næstved, Denmark
| | - Abhilasha Saini
- Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Næstved, Denmark
| | - Maja Vestmø Maraldo
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian Boye
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie Louise Holm Milo
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ingelise Jensen
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Susanne Nørring Bekke
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette Holck Nielsen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ebbe Laugaard Lorenzen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Stine Sofia Korreman
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Song YC, Hu ZH, Yan XN, Fang H, Tang Y, Jing H, Men K, Zhang N, Zhang J, Jin J, Zhong QZ, Ma J, Yang WF, Zhong YH, Dong LH, Wang XH, Wu HF, Du XH, Hou XR, Tie J, Lu YF, Zhao LN, Li YX, Wang SL. Quality assurance in a phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of POstmastectomy radioThErapy in Node posiTive breast cancer with or without Internal mAmmary nodaL irradiation (POTENTIAL): a planning benchmark case. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:194. [PMID: 38031125 PMCID: PMC10685528 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02379-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the planning benchmark case results of the POTENTIAL trial-a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial-to evaluate the value of internal mammary nodal (IMN) irradiation for patients with high-risk breast cancer. METHODS All participating institutions were provided the outlines of one benchmark case, and they generated radiation therapy plans per protocol. The plans were evaluated by a quality assurance team, after which the institutions resubmitted their revised plans. The information on beams arrangement, skin flash, inhomogeneity corrections, and protocol compliance was assessed in the first and final submission. RESULTS The plans from 26 institutions were analyzed. Some major deviations were found in the first submission. The protocol compliance rates of dose coverage for the planning target volume of chest wall, supraclavicular fossa plus axilla, and IMN region (PTVim) were all significantly improved in the final submission, which were 96.2% vs. 69.2%, 100% vs. 76.9%, and 88.4% vs. 53.8%, respectively. For OARs, the compliance rates of heart Dmean, left anterior descending coronary artery V40Gy, ipsilateral lung V5Gy, and stomach V5Gy were significantly improved. In the first and final submission, the mean values of PTVim V100% were 79.9% vs. 92.7%; the mean values of heart Dmean were 11.5 Gy vs. 9.7 Gy for hypofractionated radiation therapy and 11.5 Gy vs. 11.0 Gy for conventional fractionated radiation therapy, respectively. CONCLUSION The major deviations were corrected and protocol compliance was significantly improved after revision, which highlighted the importance of planning benchmark case to guarantee the planning quality for multicenter trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Chun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Pan jia yuan nan li, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhi-Hui Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Pan jia yuan nan li, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xue-Na Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Pan jia yuan nan li, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Pan jia yuan nan li, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Pan jia yuan nan li, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Hao Jing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Pan jia yuan nan li, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Kuo Men
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Pan jia yuan nan li, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Na Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital &Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Qiu-Zi Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beijing Hospital, Ministry of Health, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Wei-Fang Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Taizhou Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Taizhou, China
| | - Ya-Hua Zhong
- Department of Radiation and Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors, Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center, Wuhan, China
| | - Li-Hua Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Xiao-Hong Wang
- Department of Radiochemotherapy, Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Hong-Fen Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Hospital of Jilin Province, Changchun, China
| | - Xiang-Hui Du
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiao-Rong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China.
| | - Jian Tie
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100048, China.
| | - Yu-Fei Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450003, China.
| | - Li-Na Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Xijing Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, China.
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Pan jia yuan nan li, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Shu-Lian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/ Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Pan jia yuan nan li, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nielsen AWM, Spejlborg H, Lutz CM, Rugaard Poulsen P, Offersen BV. Difference between planned and delivered radiotherapy dose to the internal mammary nodes in high-risk breast cancer patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100470. [PMID: 37533551 PMCID: PMC10393587 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Chest wall movement during radiotherapy can impact the delivered dose to the internal mammary nodes (IMN) in high-risk breast cancer patients. Using portal imaging and dose reconstruction we aimed to examine the delivered IMN dose coverage. Material and methods Cine MV images were recorded for 39 breast cancer patients treated with daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). On the final frame of each cine MV recording the chest wall was matched with the Digitally Reconstructed Radiograph (DRR) from the treatment plan. The geometrical chest wall error was determined in the imager-plane perpendicular to the cranio-caudal direction, rounded to integer millimeters, and binned. For each 1 mm bin, an isocenter-shifted treatment plan was recalculated assuming that the projected error observed in the cine MV image was caused by anterior-posterior chest wall movement in the IMN region. A weighted plan sum yielded the IMN clinical target volume receiving at least 90% dose (V90_CTVn_IMN). Results The mean number of cine MV observations per patient was 36 (range 26-55). Most patients (67%) had on average a posterior chest wall position at treatment compared to planned. This translated into a change in the delivered median V90_CTVn_IMN of -0.7% (range, -11.9-2.9%; p < 0.001). The V90_CTVn_IMN reduction was greater than 9% in three patients. No clinically relevant differences were found for the mean lung dose or mean heart dose. Conclusion Using cine MV images, we found that the delivered V90_CTVn_IMN was significantly lower than planned. In 8% of the patients, the V90_CTVn_IMN reduction exceeded 9%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harald Spejlborg
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Per Rugaard Poulsen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marks LB, Pierce LJ, Buchholz TA, Haffty BG. Nailing the Clavicular Head: Assuring Adequate Coverage of the Medial/Inferior Aspect of the Supraclavicular Space in Patients Receiving Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e121-e125. [PMID: 36748209 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | - Lori J Pierce
- Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Bruce G Haffty
- Deptartment Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson and New Jersey Medical Schools, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thorsen LBJ, Overgaard J, Matthiessen LW, Berg M, Stenbygaard L, Pedersen AN, Nielsen MH, Overgaard M, Offersen BV. Internal Mammary Node Irradiation in Patients With Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Fifteen-Year Results From the Danish Breast Cancer Group Internal Mammary Node Study. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:4198-4206. [PMID: 35394824 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Danish Breast Cancer Group Internal Mammary Node study demonstrated improved 8-year overall survival (OS) with internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) in patients with node-positive early breast cancer. Here, we present long-term results from the Danish Breast Cancer Group Internal Mammary Node study cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS This nationwide, prospective cohort study allocated patients with node-positive early breast cancer to adjuvant radiotherapy with or without IMNI depending on cancer laterality. Patients with right-sided cancer received IMNI. Patients with left-sided cancer were treated without IMNI because of risk of radiation-induced heart disease. Other treatment was independent of laterality. The primary study end point was OS. Secondary end points were distant recurrence and breast cancer mortality. Analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS During 2003-2007, 3,089 women were allocated to IMNI (right-sided, n = 1,491) or no IMNI (left-sided, n = 1,598). With a median follow-up of 14.8 years, 589 patients with and 701 patients without IMNI had died. The corresponding 15-year OS rates were 60.1% and 55.4%. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.96; P = .007) in favor of IMNI. The 15-year risk of developing distant recurrence was 35.6% (523 recurrences) and 38.6% (602 recurrences) with vs. without IMNI (adjusted HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.79 to 0.99; P = .04]). The 15-year breast cancer mortality with IMNI was 31.7% (467 deaths) compared with 33.9% (537 deaths) without IMNI (adjusted HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78 to 1.00; P = .05]). The distribution of other deaths was similar across groups. CONCLUSION In patients with node-positive early breast cancer treated with IMNI or without IMNI depending on breast cancer laterality, IMNI reduced the risk of distant recurrence and death from breast cancer, thereby improving long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise B J Thorsen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Martin Berg
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Lars Stenbygaard
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Mette H Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Marie Overgaard
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Thorsen LBJ, Offersen BV. Reply to Y. Lu et al and E. Hindié et al. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3670-3671. [PMID: 35787109 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lise B J Thorsen
- Lise B.J. Thorsen, MD, PhD, and Birgitte V. Offersen, MD, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark, Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Lise B.J. Thorsen, MD, PhD, and Birgitte V. Offersen, MD, PhD, Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark, Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Oncology, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhao XR, Fang H, Tang Y, Hu ZH, Jing H, Liang L, Yan XN, Song YW, Jin J, Liu YP, Chen B, Tang Y, Qi SN, Li N, Lu NN, Men K, Hu C, Zhang YH, Li YX, Wang SL. POstmastectomy radioThErapy in Node-posiTive breast cancer with or without Internal mAmmary nodaL irradiation (POTENTIAL): a study protocol for a multicenter prospective phase III randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1185. [PMID: 34742270 PMCID: PMC8571887 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08852-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various randomized trials have demonstrated that postmastectomy radiotherapy (RT) to the chest wall and comprehensive regional nodal areas improves survival in patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer. Controversy exists as to whether the internal mammary node (IMN) region is an essential component of regional nodal irradiation. Available data on the survival benefit of IMN irradiation (IMNI) are conflicting. The patient populations enrolled in previous studies were heterogeneous and most studies were conducted before modern systemic treatment and three-dimensional (3D) radiotherapy (RT) techniques were introduced. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of IMNI in the context of modern systemic treatment and computed tomography (CT)-based RT planning techniques. METHODS POTENTIAL is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, parallel, phase III, randomized controlled trial investigating whether IMNI improves disease-free survival (DFS) in high-risk breast cancer with positive axillary nodes (pN+) after mastectomy. A total of 1800 patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive IMNI or not. All patients are required to receive ≥ six cycles of anthracycline and/or taxane-based chemotherapy. Randomization will be stratified by institution, tumor location (medial/central vs. other quadrants), the number of positive axillary nodes (1-3 vs. 4-9 vs. ≥10), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs. no). Treatment will be delivered with CT-based 3D RT techniques, including 3D conformal RT, intensity-modulated RT, or volumetric modulated arc therapy. The prescribed dose is 50 Gy in 25 fractions or 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions. Tiered RT quality assurance is required. After RT, patients will be followed up at regular intervals. Oncological and toxilogical outcomes, especially cardiac toxicities, will be assessed. DISCUSSION This trial design is intended to overcome the limitations of previous prospective studies by recruiting patients with pN+ breast cancer, using DFS as the primary endpoint, and prospectively assessing cardiac toxicities and requiring RT quality assurance. The results of this study will provide high-level evidence for elective IMNI in patients with breast cancer after mastectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrails.gov , NCT04320979 . Registered 25 Match 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04320979.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu-Ran Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Hui Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhi-Hui Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Hao Jing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lin Liang
- Heart Failure Center, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China
| | - Xue-Na Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yong-Wen Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yue-Ping Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shu-Nan Qi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ning Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ning-Ning Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Kuo Men
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Chen Hu
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21205-2013, USA.
| | - Yu-Hui Zhang
- Heart Failure Center, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, China.
| | - Ye-Xiong Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Shu-Lian Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Excluding Lung Tissue from the PTV during Internal Mammary Irradiation. A Safe Technique for OAR-Sparing? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13081951. [PMID: 33919587 PMCID: PMC8073233 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13081951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The planning treatment volume (PTV) during internal mammary irradiation (IMNI) regularly overlaps with lung tissue and is often in close proximity to the heart. Thus, exclusion of lung tissue from the PTV is a potential technique to spare the organs at risk (OARs) during adjuvant breast cancer irradiation. Using an innovative dose recalculation and accumulation algorithm, we evaluated the safety of exclusion of lung tissue from the PTV. According to our data, exclusion of lung tissue from the PTV to spare the OARs leads to significant dose reduction in the target volume and can, therefore, not be recommended. Abstract The current study aims to determine whether exclusion of lung tissue from planning treatment volume (PTV) is a valid organ at risk (OAR)-sparing technique during internal mammary irradiation (IMNI). Twenty patients with left-sided breast cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy including IMNI after mastectomy or lumpectomy with daily ConeBeam CT (CBCT; median n = 28) were enrolled in the current study. The daily dose distribution of the patients was estimated by recalculating treatment plans on CBCT-scans based on a standard PTV (PTV margin: 5mm-STD) and a modified PTV, which excluded overlapping lung tissue (ExLung). Using 3D-deformable dose accumulation, the dose coverage in the target volume was estimated in dependence of the PTV-margins. The estimated delivered dose in the IMN-CTV was significantly lower for the ExLung PTV compared to the STD PTV: ExLung: V95%: 76.6 ± 22.9%; V90%: 89.6 ± 13.2%, STD: V95%: 95.6 ± 7.4%; V90%: 99.1 ± 2.7%. Daily CBCT imaging cannot sufficiently compensate the anatomic changes and intrafraction movement throughout the treatment. Therefore, to ensure adequate delivery of the prescribed dose to the IMN-CTV, exclusion of lung tissue from the PTV to spare the OARs is not recommended.
Collapse
|
12
|
Milo MLH, Thorsen LBJ, Johnsen SP, Nielsen KM, Valentin JB, Alsner J, Offersen BV. Risk of coronary artery disease after adjuvant radiotherapy in 29,662 early breast cancer patients: A population-based Danish Breast Cancer Group study. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:106-113. [PMID: 33515670 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT) for early breast cancer (BC) reduces the risk of recurrence and improves overall survival. However, thoracic RT may cause some incidental RT dose to the heart with subsequent risk of heart disease. During 2000-2010, CT-based RT planning was gradually introduced. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of cardiac events in left-sided compared with right-sided BC patients treated during a non-CT-based (1999-2007) vs a CT-based period (2008-2016). MATERIAL AND METHODS Information on BC and cardiac events among Danish women was obtained from population-based medical registers. Patients diagnosed with BC during 1999-2016, were included. A cardiac event was defined as coronary artery disease or severe valvular heart disease. RESULTS Among 29,662 patients, 22,056 received RT. For those irradiated during the non-CT-based period, the 10-year cumulative risk of cardiac event was 1.7% (95% CI 1.4-2.0) at median follow-up of 11.1 years. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for cardiac event in left-sided vs right-sided patients was 1.44 (1.07-1.94) and a trend towards worse outcome was seen within the first 10 years after RT and approached statistical significance with longer follow-up. Among patients irradiated during the CT-based period, the 10-year cumulative risk of cardiac event was 2.1% (1.8-2.4) at median 6.8 years follow-up. The IRR for cardiac event in left-sided vs right-sided patients was 0.90 (0.69-1.16) and no trend towards worse outcome within the first 10 years was observed. CONCLUSION This study confirmed a higher risk of cardiac events in left-sided vs right-sided BC patients irradiated during a non-CT-based period. For patients irradiated during a CT-based period, no increased risk of cardiac events in left-sided vs right-sided patients was observed within the first 10 years after RT, whilst information on cardiac events beyond 10 years after RT was limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Søren Paaske Johnsen
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | - Jan Brink Valentin
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jan Alsner
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhao Y, Zhu J, Zhang X, Wu G, Xu Y, Shen P, Wei X, Kong D, Ji S, Yang B. Integrated IMRT vs segmented 3D-CRT of the chest wall and supraclavicular region for Breast Cancer after modified Radical Mastectomy: An 8-year follow-up. J Cancer 2021; 12:1548-1554. [PMID: 33532000 PMCID: PMC7847649 DOI: 10.7150/jca.51125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two radiotherapy techniques for breast cancer patients with post-mastectomy. The intensity-modulated radiotherapy for treating the chest wall and regional nodes contoured as a whole planning target volume was compared with the conventional segmented 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Materials and methods: Patients who received the two post-mastectomy radiation therapies were retrospectively analyzed. The chest wall and supra/infraclavicular region +/- internal mammary nodes were contoured as a whole planning target volume on the planning computed tomography. We evaluated differences in survival, recurrence, and late side effects between the integrated intensity-modulated radiotherapy group and the conventional segmented group. Results: A total of 223 patients were recruited. The mean follow-up was 104.3 months. Of these patients, 129 received integrated radiotherapy and 94 patients received segmented radiotherapy. The 8-year disease-free survival rates were 86.0% and 73.4% for patients treated with integrated radiotherapy and traditional segmented radiotherapy, respectively (P = 0.022). The 8-year overall survival rates were 91.4% and 86.2% for patients treated with integrated radiotherapy and traditional segmented radiotherapy, respectively (P = 0.530). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that radiotherapy was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival. No significant difference was observed in late side-effects between the two groups. Conclusion: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for treating the chest wall and regional nodes contoured as a whole planning target volume reduces the recurrence rate for post-mastectomy breast cancer patients with tolerable toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutian Zhao
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, P.R. China
| | - Jiahao Zhu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, P.R. China
| | - Xiaojun Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, P.R. China
| | - Gang Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, P.R. China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, P.R. China
| | - Peipei Shen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, P.R. China
| | - Xianding Wei
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, P.R. China
| | - Dong Kong
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, P.R. China
| | - Shengjun Ji
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215000, P.R. China
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Utilization patterns and temporal trends of internal mammary nodal irradiation at a tertiary cancer center. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 182:367-379. [PMID: 32474745 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05708-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The role and uptake of internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI) is variable. This study was designed to quantify the rates and determinants of IMNI at a tertiary cancer center. METHODS Consecutively treated breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant locoregional radiation therapy (RT) from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017 were sorted by IMNI receipt, disease risk and time period of RT delivery (2012-2015 vs 2016-2017). Differences between risk categories and groups were evaluated using χ2/Fisher's and Mann-Whitney test for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with IMNI receipt. RESULTS A total of 1566 patients were eligible, with 376 in Group 1 (IMNI), and 1190 in Group 2 (no IMNI). The proportion of patients receiving IMNI increased significantly each year (p < 0.0001), and 83% of patients receiving IMNI had pT1-2/pN1 disease. On univariable analysis, younger age, lymphovascular invasion, medial/central quadrant, higher stage, PR negative, mastectomy, axillary dissection, receipt of chemotherapy and nodal positivity had higher odds of IMNI. On multivariable analysis, younger age (p = < 0.001), medial/central quadrant (p = 0.0026), PR negative (p = 0.0011), mastectomy (p = 0.0055), increasing nodal positivity (p < 0.0001) and late cohort (p = 0.001) had increased likelihood of IMNI. The use of deep-inspiration breath hold was significantly higher in those receiving IMNI (45% vs 26%, p < 0.0001), and permitted achievement of acceptable mean heart and lung doses. CONCLUSIONS There was a significant increase in IMNI utilization after 2015. Younger age, medial/central quadrant, PR-negative and node-positive disease predicted for receipt of IMNI. Modern RT techniques permit the safe delivery of IMNI.
Collapse
|
15
|
Rogé M, Thureau S, Dampierre J, Dubray B, Rivera S. [Prophylactic nodal radiotherapy for breast cancer]. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:904-912. [PMID: 31594695 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Adjuvant radiotherapy is a key treatment in early-stage breast cancer. The meta-analysis by the Early Breast Cancer Trialist's Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) has demonstrated a decreased risk of locoregional relapse and death after whole-breast radiotherapy. Prophylactic lymph nodes irradiation in breast cancer has also proven to be beneficial in several therapeutic trials. At a time when three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy has become the standard procedure and with the development of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, defining nodal volumes is essential and practices should be harmonized to assess and compare the efficiency and toxicity of radiotherapy. Furthermore, the indication of lymph nodes irradiation has to take into account the risk/benefit balance as expanding the irradiated volume can increase radio-induced toxicity. Selection of patients receiving this treatment is essential. The aim of this update is to define nodal volumes, to precise the indications of their irradiation and to present the expected benefits as well as the potential side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rogé
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Henri-Becquerel, 1, rue d'Amiens,76000 Rouen, France.
| | - S Thureau
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Henri-Becquerel, 1, rue d'Amiens,76000 Rouen, France
| | - J Dampierre
- Service de pneumologie oncologie thoracique et soins intensifs respiratoires, centre hospitalier universitaire de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - B Dubray
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Henri-Becquerel, 1, rue d'Amiens,76000 Rouen, France
| | - S Rivera
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Sud, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang C, Shi D, Yang P. BNP as a potential biomarker for cardiac damage of breast cancer after radiotherapy: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16507. [PMID: 31335723 PMCID: PMC6709106 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To analyze whether BNP could be a potential biomarker for cardiac damage of breast cancer after radiotherapy. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest and Medline were searched using the key words "breast cancer" ("breast tumor", "breast neoplasm", or "breast carcinoma"), "brain natriuretic peptide" (or BNP) and "radiotherapy" (or "radiation therapy"). Four articles were selected and analyzed using the STATA 12.0 software package. The standard mean difference (SMD) and its standard error for BNP were calculated to assess the relationship between BNP and radiotherapy for breast cancer patients. RESULTS In total, 172 patients with breast cancer were identified. The pooled SMD was -0.233 (95% CI -1.113, -0.057). The pooled estimated SMD for all studies showed obvious significant difference (z = 3.99, P = .000). There was no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis suggested that BNP could be a biomarker of cardiac damage at high heart absorbed doses according to radiotherapy, especially for left breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease; Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease; Jilin Provincial Molecular Biology Research Center for Precision Medicine of Major Cardiovascular Disease; Jilin Provincial Cardiovascular Research Institute
| | - Dan Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Japan Union hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Ping Yang
- Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University; Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease; Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Endothelial Function and Genetic Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease; Jilin Provincial Molecular Biology Research Center for Precision Medicine of Major Cardiovascular Disease; Jilin Provincial Cardiovascular Research Institute
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Internal Mammary Node Irradiation (IMNI) Improves Survival Outcome for Patients With Clinical Stage II-III Breast Cancer After Preoperative Systemic Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 103:895-904. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2018] [Revised: 10/10/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
18
|
Taylor C, McGale P, Brønnum D, Correa C, Cutter D, Duane FK, Gigante B, Jensen MB, Lorenzen E, Rahimi K, Wang Z, Darby SC, Hall P, Ewertz M. Cardiac Structure Injury After Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer: Cross-Sectional Study With Individual Patient Data. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36:2288-2296. [PMID: 29791285 PMCID: PMC6067799 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.77.6351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Incidental cardiac irradiation can cause cardiac injury, but little is known about the effect of radiation on specific cardiac segments. Methods For 456 women who received breast cancer radiotherapy between 1958 and 2001 and then later experienced a major coronary event, information was obtained on the radiotherapy regimen they received and on the location of their cardiac injury. For 414 women, all with documented location of left ventricular (LV) injury, doses to five LV segments were estimated. For 133 women, all with documented location of coronary artery disease with ≥ 70% stenosis, doses to six coronary artery segments were estimated. For each segment, numbers of women with left-sided and right-sided breast cancer were compared. Results Of women with LV injury, 243 had left-sided breast cancer and 171 had right-sided breast cancer (ratio of left v right, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.73), reflecting the higher typical LV radiation doses in left-sided cancer (average dose left-sided, 8.3 Gy; average dose right-sided, 0.6 Gy; left minus right dose difference, 7.7 Gy). For individual LV segments, the ratios of women with left- versus right-sided radiotherapy were as follows: inferior, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.25); lateral, 1.42 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.95); septal, 2.09 (95% CI, 1.37 to 3.19); anterior, 1.85 (95% CI, 1.39 to 2.46); and apex, 4.64 (95% CI, 2.42 to 8.90); corresponding left-minus-right dose differences for these segments were 2.7, 4.9, 7.2, 10.4, and 21.6 Gy, respectively ( Ptrend < .001). For women with coronary artery disease, the ratios of women with left- versus right-radiotherapy for individual coronary artery segments were as follows: right coronary artery proximal, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.91); right coronary artery mid or distal, 1.69 (95% CI, 0.85 to 3.36); circumflex proximal, 1.46 (95% CI, 0.72 to 2.96); circumflex distal, 1.11 (95% CI, 0.45 to 2.73); left anterior descending proximal, 1.89 (95% CI, 1.07 to 3.34); and left anterior descending mid or distal, 2.33 (95% CI, 1.19 to 4.59); corresponding left-minus-right dose differences for these segements were -5.0, -2.5, 1.6, 3.5, 9.5, and 38.8 Gy ( Ptrend = .002). Conclusion For individual LV and coronary artery segments, higher radiation doses were strongly associated with more frequent injury, suggesting that all segments are sensitive to radiation and that doses to all segments should be minimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Taylor
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paul McGale
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dorthe Brønnum
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Candace Correa
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Cutter
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Frances K. Duane
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bruna Gigante
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maj-Britt Jensen
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ebbe Lorenzen
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kazem Rahimi
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zhe Wang
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sarah C. Darby
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marianne Ewertz
- Carolyn Taylor, Paul McGale, David Cutter, Frances K. Duane, Zhe Wang, and Sarah C. Darby, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford; Kazem Rahimi, George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Dorthe Brønnum, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjoerring; Maj-Britt Jensen, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Ebbe Lorenzen and Marianne Ewertz, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Candace Correa, Community Cancer Center, Normal, IL; Bruna Gigante and Per Hall, Karolinska Institutet; Bruna Gigante, Danderyd Hospital; and Per Hall, South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Thompson MK, Poortmans P, Chalmers AJ, Faivre-Finn C, Hall E, Huddart RA, Lievens Y, Sebag-Montefiore D, Coles CE. Practice-changing radiation therapy trials for the treatment of cancer: where are we 150 years after the birth of Marie Curie? Br J Cancer 2018; 119:389-407. [PMID: 30061587 PMCID: PMC6117262 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0201-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2017] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
As we mark 150 years since the birth of Marie Curie, we reflect on the global advances made in radiation oncology and the current status of radiation therapy (RT) research. Large-scale international RT clinical trials have been fundamental in driving evidence-based change and have served to improve cancer management and to reduce side effects. Radiation therapy trials have also improved practice by increasing quality assurance and consistency in treatment protocols across multiple centres. This review summarises some of the key RT practice-changing clinical trials over the last two decades, in four common cancer sites for which RT is a crucial component of curative treatment: breast, lung, urological and lower gastro-intestinal cancer. We highlight the global inequality in access to RT, and the work of international organisations, such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Clinical and Translational Radiotherapy Research Working Group (CTRad), that aim to improve access to RT and facilitate radiation research. We discuss some emerging RT technologies including proton beam therapy and magnetic resonance linear accelerators and predict likely future directions in clinical RT research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mareike K Thompson
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | | | - Anthony J Chalmers
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G61 1QH, UK
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Emma Hall
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Robert A Huddart
- Section of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds; Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospitals, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Charlotte E Coles
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Berg M, Lorenzen EL, Jensen I, Thomsen MS, Lutz CM, Refsgaard L, Nissen HD, Offersen BV. The potential benefits from respiratory gating for breast cancer patients regarding target coverage and dose to organs at risk when applying strict dose limits to the heart: results from the DBCG HYPO trial. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:113-119. [PMID: 29205080 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1406139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The potential benefits from respiratory gating (RG) compared to free-breathing (FB) regarding target coverage and dose to organs at risk for breast cancer patients receiving post-operative radiotherapy (RT) in the DBCG HYPO multicentre trial are reported. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients included in the DBCG HYPO trial were randomized between 50 Gy in 25 fractions (normofractionated) versus 40 Gy in 15 fractions (hypofractionated). A tangential forward field-in-field dose planning technique was used to cover the clinical target volume (CTV) with the intent to limit dose to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA) to 20 Gy and 17 Gy in the normo- and hypofractionated arms, respectively. Treatment plan data for 1327 patients from four Danish centres was retrospectively analyzed. FB right-sided patients served as control group for the left-sided patients regarding CTV V95% (relative volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose), mean heart dose (MHD) and mean lung dose (MLD). RESULTS Median CTV V95% was for FB right-sided, FB left-sided and RG left-sided patients 94.6, 92.6 and 94.7% for normofractionated therapy, respectively, and 94.6, 91.8 and 94.4% for hypofractionated therapy and did not differ significantly for RG left-sided plans compared to FB right-sided in either study arm. CTV V95% was significantly lower for FB versus RG for left-sided plans in both arms. Median MHD was 0.7, 1.8 and 1.5 Gy (normofractionated therapy) versus 0.6, 1.5 and 1.2 Gy (hypofractionated therapy), respectively. The corresponding median MLD was 9.0, 8.3 and 7.3 Gy versus 7.3, 6.4 and 5.8 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS RG for left-sided breast cancer patients ensured similar CTV V95% as for FB right-sided patients. MLD was lower for RG due to the increased lung volume. MHD was generally low due to strict protocol-defined maximum dose to LADCA, but for left-sided patients RG led to significantly lower MHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Berg
- Department of Medical Physics, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Ebbe L. Lorenzen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ingelise Jensen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mette S. Thomsen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark Aarhus
| | | | - Lasse Refsgaard
- Department of Medical Physics, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jensen MB, Laenkholm AV, Offersen BV, Christiansen P, Kroman N, Mouridsen HT, Ejlertsen B. The clinical database and implementation of treatment guidelines by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group in 2007-2016. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:13-18. [PMID: 29202621 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1404638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since 40 years, Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) has provided comprehensive guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. This population-based analysis aimed to describe the plurality of modifications introduced over the past 10 years in the national Danish guidelines for the management of early breast cancer. By use of the clinical DBCG database we analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of guideline revisions in Denmark. METHODS From the DBCG guidelines we extracted modifications introduced in 2007-2016 and selected examples regarding surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatment. We assessed introduction of modifications from release on the DBCG webpage to change in clinical practice using the DBCG clinical database. RESULTS Over a 10-year period data from 48,772 patients newly diagnosed with malignant breast tumors were entered into DBCG's clinical database and 42,197 of these patients were diagnosed with an invasive carcinoma following breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. More than twenty modifications were introduced in the guidelines. Implementations, based on prospectively collected data, varied widely; exemplified with around one quarter of the patients not treated according to a specific guideline within one year from the introduction, to an almost immediate full implantation. CONCLUSIONS Modifications of the DBCG guidelines were generally well implemented, but the time to full implementation varied from less than one year up to around five years. Our data is registry based and does not allow a closer analysis of the causes for delay in implementation of guideline modifications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maj-Britt Jensen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) Secretariat and Statistical Office, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Peer Christiansen
- Breast Unit, Aarhus University Hospital/Randers Regional Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Niels Kroman
- Department of Breast Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henning T. Mouridsen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) Secretariat and Statistical Office, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bent Ejlertsen
- Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) Secretariat and Statistical Office, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Davidson T, Ben-David M, Galper S, Haskin T, Howes M, Scaife R, Kanana N, Amit U, Weizman N, Chikman B, Goshen E, Ben-Haim S, Symon Z, Goldstein J. Use of 18 F-FDG PET-CT imaging to determine internal mammary lymph node location for radiation therapy treatment planning in breast cancer patients. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:373-381. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2016] [Revised: 10/31/2016] [Accepted: 11/02/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
23
|
Internal mammary lymph nodes radiotherapy of breast cancer in the era of individualized medicine. Oncotarget 2017; 8:81583-81590. [PMID: 29113416 PMCID: PMC5655311 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Inclusion internal mammary lymph nodes as a part of regional nodal irradiation have a potential to reduce local recurrence, distant recurrence, and improve survival in breast cancer. However, the increased risk of cardiac toxicity and lungs injure associated with internal mammary lymph nodes irradiation has drew more and more attention. Estimating risk of metastasis in internal mammary lymph nodes based on axillary lymph nodes metastasis status is not always reliable: low-risk do not always mean negative in internal mammary lymph nodes and high-risk do not always indicate positive in internal mammary lymph nodes. Inaccurate prediction of in internal mammary lymph nodes metastasis might lead to over- or under-treatment of in internal mammary lymph node. Internal mammary sentinel lymph node biopsy is a minimally invasive technique which has a high potential to accurately evaluate the metastasis status in in internal mammary lymph nodes and improve accuracy of nodal staging. This technique might be a useful tool to guide individualized internal mammary lymph nodes irradiation.
Collapse
|
24
|
Rehammar JC, Johansen JB, Jensen MB, Videbæk L, Jørgensen OD, Lorenzen E, Ewertz M. Risk of pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator after radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer in Denmark, 1982–2005. Radiother Oncol 2017; 122:60-65. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2016] [Revised: 07/02/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
25
|
Alongi F, Meattini I, Mazzola R, Giaj Levra N, Fiorentino A, Livi L. In Regard to Boero et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:855-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
26
|
Lorenzen EL, Brink C, Taylor CW, Darby SC, Ewertz M. Uncertainties in estimating heart doses from 2D-tangential breast cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2016; 119:71-6. [PMID: 26935984 PMCID: PMC4871929 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2015] [Revised: 01/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose We evaluated the accuracy of three methods of estimating radiation dose to the heart from two-dimensional tangential radiotherapy for breast cancer, as used in Denmark during 1982–2002. Material and methods Three tangential radiotherapy regimens were reconstructed using CT-based planning scans for 40 patients with left-sided and 10 with right-sided breast cancer. Setup errors and organ motion were simulated using estimated uncertainties. For left-sided patients, mean heart dose was related to maximum heart distance in the medial field. Results For left-sided breast cancer, mean heart dose estimated from individual CT-scans varied from <1 Gy to >8 Gy, and maximum dose from 5 to 50 Gy for all three regimens, so that estimates based only on regimen had substantial uncertainty. When maximum heart distance was taken into account, the uncertainty was reduced and was comparable to the uncertainty of estimates based on individual CT-scans. For right-sided breast cancer patients, mean heart dose based on individual CT-scans was always <1 Gy and maximum dose always <5 Gy for all three regimens. Conclusions The use of stored individual simulator films provides a method for estimating heart doses in left-tangential radiotherapy for breast cancer that is almost as accurate as estimates based on individual CT-scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebbe L Lorenzen
- Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Carsten Brink
- Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Carolyn W Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah C Darby
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marianne Ewertz
- Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Palumbo I, Palumbo B, Fravolini ML, Marcantonini M, Perrucci E, Latini ME, Falcinelli L, Sabalich I, Tranfaglia C, Schillaci G, Mannarino E, Aristei C. Brain natriuretic peptide as a cardiac marker of transient radiotherapy-related damage in left-sided breast cancer patients: A prospective study. Breast 2016; 25:45-50. [PMID: 26547836 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2015] [Revised: 09/04/2015] [Accepted: 10/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Our study evaluated brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) changes over time after adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in women with left-sided breast cancer investigating its correlation with heart dosimetric parameters. METHODS Forty-three patients underwent clinical cardiac examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography and BNP measurement before RT (T0) and 1 (T1), 6 (T6) and 12 months (T12) after. After T12 cardiac assessment was performed annually in each patient. Mean values and standard deviation (SD) of BNP, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), V20, V25, V30, V45 and mean dose were calculated. Normalized BNP (BNPn) was calculated as follows: BNPnT1 = BNPT1/BNPT0, BNPnT6 = BNPT6/BNPT0, BNPnT12 = BNPT12/BNPT0. Absolute BNP and BNPn values were used for data analysis. RESULTS Median follow-up from the end of RT to the last check-up was 87 months (range 37-120 months). Minimum follow-up was 74 months except for two patients, who died at respectively 37 and 47 months after RT. In all patients LVEF did not change significantly (p = 0.22) after RT. BNP increased significantly (p < 0.001), particularly 1 and 6 months after RT. It slightly decreased after 12 months. BNP did not correlate with V20, V25, V30, V45, mean dose and MHD. All BNPn correlated significantly (p < 0.05) with V20, V25, V30, V45, mean dose and MHD. Four patients had a cardiac event; in the only subject who developed myocardial infarction, V20, V25, V30 and V45 were the highest and BNP increased from T1 and persisted high even at T12. CONCLUSION Our results confirm that BNP could be a useful minimally invasive marker of early RT related cardiac impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - B Palumbo
- Nuclear Medicine and Health Physics Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - M L Fravolini
- Department of Engineering, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - M Marcantonini
- Medical Physics Unit, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - E Perrucci
- Radiation Oncology Division, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - M E Latini
- Radiology Division, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - L Falcinelli
- Radiation Oncology Division, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - I Sabalich
- Nuclear Medicine and Health Physics Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - C Tranfaglia
- Nuclear Medicine and Health Physics Section, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - G Schillaci
- Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - E Mannarino
- Internal Medicine, Angiology and Arteriosclerosis Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Italy
| | - C Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Thorsen LBJ, Offersen BV, Danø H, Berg M, Jensen I, Pedersen AN, Zimmermann SJ, Brodersen HJ, Overgaard M, Overgaard J. DBCG-IMN: A Population-Based Cohort Study on the Effect of Internal Mammary Node Irradiation in Early Node-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 34:314-20. [PMID: 26598752 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.63.6456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE It is unknown whether irradiation of the internal mammary lymph nodes improves survival in patients with early-stage breast cancer. A possible survival benefit might be offset by radiation-induced heart disease. We assessed the effect of internal mammary node irradiation (IMNI) in patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this nationwide, prospective population-based cohort study, we included patients who underwent operation for unilateral early-stage node-positive breast cancer. Patients with right-sided disease were allocated to IMNI, whereas patients with left-sided disease were allocated to no IMNI because of the risk of radiation-induced heart disease. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were breast cancer mortality and distant recurrence. Analyses were by intention to treat. RESULTS A total of 3,089 patients were included. Of these, 1,492 patients were allocated to IMNI, whereas 1,597 patients were allocated to no IMNI. With a median of 8.9 years of follow-up time, the 8-year overall survival rates were 75.9% with IMNI versus 72.2% without IMNI. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94; P = .005). Breast cancer mortality was 20.9% with IMNI versus 23.4% without IMNI (adjusted HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = .03). The risk of distant recurrence at 8 years was 27.4% with IMNI versus 29.7% without IMNI (adjusted HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.01; P = .07). The effect of IMNI was more pronounced in patients at high risk of internal mammary node metastasis. Equal numbers in each group died of ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSION In this naturally allocated, population-based cohort study, IMNI increased overall survival in patients with early-stage node-positive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany.
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany
| | - Hella Danø
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany
| | - Martin Berg
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany
| | - Ingelise Jensen
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany
| | - Anders Navrsted Pedersen
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany
| | - Sune Jürg Zimmermann
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Brodersen
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany
| | - Marie Overgaard
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Lise Bech Jellesmark Thorsen, Birgitte Vrou Offersen, Marie Overgaard, and Jens Overgaard, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus; Hella Danø, Herlev Hospital, Herlev; Martin Berg, Vejle Hospital, Vejle; Ingelise Jensen, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg; Anders Navrsted Pedersen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen; Sune Jürg Zimmermann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; and Hans-Jürgen Brodersen, St Franziskus-Hospital, Flensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Grau C, Overgaard J, Høyer M, Tanderup K, Lindegaard JC, Muren LP. Biology-guided adaptive radiotherapy (BiGART) is progressing towards clinical reality. Acta Oncol 2015; 54:1245-50. [PMID: 26390238 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2015.1076992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cai Grau
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- b Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Morten Høyer
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | - Kari Tanderup
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
- c Department of Medical Physics , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| | | | - Ludvig Paul Muren
- a Department of Oncology , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
- c Department of Medical Physics , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Offersen BV, Boersma LJ, Kirkove C, Hol S, Aznar MC, Biete Sola A, Kirova YM, Pignol JP, Remouchamps V, Verhoeven K, Weltens C, Arenas M, Gabrys D, Kopek N, Krause M, Lundstedt D, Marinko T, Montero A, Yarnold J, Poortmans P. ESTRO consensus guideline on target volume delineation for elective radiation therapy of early stage breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2015; 114:3-10. [PMID: 25630428 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 450] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2014] [Revised: 11/15/2014] [Accepted: 11/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Delineation of clinical target volumes (CTVs) is a weak link in radiation therapy (RT), and large inter-observer variation is seen in breast cancer patients. Several guidelines have been proposed, but most result in larger CTVs than based on conventional simulator-based RT. The aim was to develop a delineation guideline obtained by consensus between a broad European group of radiation oncologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS During ESTRO teaching courses on breast cancer, teachers sought consensus on delineation of CTV through dialogue based on cases. One teacher delineated CTV on CT scans of 2 patients, followed by discussion and adaptation of the delineation. The consensus established between teachers was sent to other teams working in the same field, both locally and on a national level, for their input. This was followed by developing a broad consensus based on discussions. RESULTS Borders of the CTV encompassing a 5mm margin around the large veins, running through the regional lymph node levels were agreed, and for the breast/thoracic wall other vessels were pointed out to guide delineation, with comments on margins for patients with advanced breast cancer. CONCLUSION The ESTRO consensus on CTV for elective RT of breast cancer, endorsed by a broad base of the radiation oncology community, is presented to improve consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre - GROW (MAASTRO), The Netherlands
| | - Carine Kirkove
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium
| | - Sandra Hol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | | - Albert Biete Sola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Pignol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent Remouchamps
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Sainte Elisabeth (AMPR), Namur, Belgium
| | - Karolien Verhoeven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Caroline Weltens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Meritxell Arenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan, Reus, Spain
| | - Dorota Gabrys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Neil Kopek
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Dept. of Radiation Oncology and OncoRay, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden and Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Dan Lundstedt
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhuset, Gothenborg, Sweden
| | - Tanja Marinko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - John Yarnold
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical centre, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hennequin C, Fourquet A. Controverse sur l’irradiation de la chaîne mammaire interne dans le cancer du sein. Cancer Radiother 2014; 18:351-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2014] [Accepted: 06/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
32
|
Thorsen LBJ, Thomsen MS, Berg M, Jensen I, Josipovic M, Overgaard M, Overgaard J, Skogholt P, Offersen BV. CT-planned internal mammary node radiotherapy in the DBCG-IMN study: benefit versus potentially harmful effects. Acta Oncol 2014; 53:1027-34. [PMID: 24957557 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2014.925579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The DBCG-IMN is a nationwide population-based cohort study on the effect of internal mammary node radiotherapy (IMN-RT) in patients with node positive early breast cancer. Due to the risk of RT-induced heart disease, only patients with right-sided breast cancer received IMN-RT, whereas patients with left-sided breast cancer did not. At seven-year median follow-up, a 3% gain in overall survival with IMN-RT has been reported. This study estimates IMN doses and doses to organs at risk (OAR) in patients from the DBCG-IMN. Numbers needed to harm (NNH) if patients with left-sided breast cancer had received IMN-RT are compared to the number needed to treat (NNT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Ten percent of CT-guided treatment plans from the DBCG-IMN patients were selected randomly. IMNs and OAR were contoured in 68 planning CT scans. Dose distributions were re-calculated. IMNs and OAR dose estimates were compared in right-sided versus left-sided breast cancer patients. In six left-sided patients, IMN-RT was simulated, and OAR doses were compared to those in the original plan. The NNH resulting from the change in mean heart dose (MHD) was calculated using a published model for risk of RT-related ischemic heart death. RESULTS In original plans, the absolute difference between right- and left-sided V90% to the IMNs was 38.0% [95% confidence interval (5.5%; 70.5%), p < 0.05]. Heart doses were higher in left-sided plans. With IMN-RT simulation without regard to OAR constraints, MHD increased 4.8 Gy (0.9 Gy; 8.7 Gy), p < 0.05. Resulting NNHs from ischemic heart death were consistently larger than the NNT with IMN-RT. CONCLUSION Refraining from IMN-RT on the left side may have spared some ischemic heart deaths. Assuming left-sided patients benefit as much from IMN-RT as right-sided patients, the benefits from IMN-RT outweigh the costs in terms of ischemic heart death.
Collapse
|
33
|
Risk of second primary lung cancer in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2014; 111:366-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2014] [Revised: 05/05/2014] [Accepted: 05/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|