A prospective pharmacologic evaluation of age-related toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer

Impact of Age on Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor (PARPi)-Induced Lymphopenia: A Scoping Review of the Literature and Internal Analysis of a Retrospective Database

BACKGROUND

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are increasingly used in oncology; their hematological toxicities affect classically red, platelet and neutrophil lineages, but some opportunistic infections have been reported concomitantly to deep lymphopenias.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to provide an external and internal analysis of the crossed impacts of PARPi and age on lymphopenia risk.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A scoping review was performed on the PubMed and Embase databases to assess the reporting of lymphocyte rates in original studies on PARPi treatment for adult patients up to 1 April 2022. A retrospective cohort was extracted from the medical charts of all patients treated for gynecological cancer at our institution from 2015 to 2022 in accordance with ethical regulations.

RESULTS

The scoping review research strategy retrieved 5840 abstracts; 225 studies were selected for full-text analysis. Lymphopenia was reported in 41.8% of the studies; frequency of all-grade and grade ≥ 3 lymphopenia reached 20.5% and 8.9%, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 lymphopenia was significantly higher in studies including older patients (median age ≥ 60 years vs. < 60 years), at 7.5% vs. 10.3% (p < 0.0001). PARIB-OLD-HCL included 46 patients, 19 of whom were aged < 70 years (median 44 years) and 27 of whom were aged ≥ 70 years (median 79 years); the frequency of all-grade and grade ≥ 3 lymphopenia reached 67% (< 70 years: 63%; ≥ 70 years: 70%) and 13% (< 70 years: 5%; ≥ 70 years: 19%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lymphopenia events were much more frequent in real-life than in previously reported studies, particularly in older patients. Future work is needed to improve patient follow-up and discuss prophylactic strategies.

Immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of an International Experts Panel Meeting by the Italian Association of Thoracic Oncology (AIOT)

BACKGROUND

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the front-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently the standard of care. However, as clinical trials include a very limited number of elderly patients, evidence on the safety and efficacy of using ICI-based regimens is still limited.

METHODS

A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2022 to review the available evidence on the use of ICI-based regimens in the first-line setting in elderly patients with NSCLC and provide a position paper on the field both in clinical practice and in a research setting.

RESULTS

All panelists agreed that age per se is not a limitation for ICI treatments, as the elderly should be considered only as a surrogate for other clinical factors of frailty. Overall, ICI efficacy in the elderly population is supported by reviewed data. In addition, the panelists were confident that available data support the safety of single-agent immunotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC. Conversely, concerns were expressed on the safety of chemo + ICI-based combination, which were considered mainly related to the toxicities of chemotherapy components. Therefore, suggestions were proposed to tailor combined approaches in the elderly patients with NSCLC. The panelists defined high, medium, and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to implementing the real-world assessment of elderly patients treated with ICIs, who are mostly underrepresented in pivotal clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the current evidence, the panelists outlined the significant limitations affecting the clinical practice in elderly patients affected by NSCLC, and reached common considerations on the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ICI monotherapy and ICI combinations in the first-line setting.

Management of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Elderly Patients

Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is one of the most difficult cancers in the head and neck region due to the complex geometry of the tumour and the surrounding critical organs. High-dose radical radiotherapy with or without concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy is the primary treatment modality. Around 10%–15% of NPC patients have their diagnosis at age after 70. The management of NPC in elderly patients is particularly challenging as they encompass a broad range of patient phenotypes and are often prone to treatment-related toxicities. Chronologic age alone is insufficient to decide on the management plan. Comprehensive geriatric assessment with evaluation on patients’ functional status, mental condition, estimated life expectancy, comorbidities, risks and benefits of the treatment, patients’ preference, and family support is essential. In addition, little data from randomized controlled trials are available to guide treatment decisions in elderly patients with NPC. In deciding which treatment strategy would be suitable for an individual elderly patient, we reviewed the literature and reviewed the analysis of primary studies, reviews, and guidelines on management of NPC. This review also summarises the current evidence for NPC management in elderly adults from early to late stage of disease.

Systemic therapy for older patients with early breast cancer

Over a third of breast cancers are diagnosed in patients ≥70 years. With the ageing of the population, the number of older breast cancer patients will continue to rise. Older patients are under-represented in clinical studies underpinning breast cancer therapy, and frequently do not receive guideline-concordant care. This review outlines the evidence on the efficacy and the safety of systemic treatment options for the management of early-stage breast cancer (EBC) in older adults and identifies where critical data gaps exist. Chemotherapy is beneficial for older patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative EBC, whilst the benefit for those with ER-positive disease is less certain. Careful consideration should be given to the side-effect profile of the treatment regimen chosen, owing to the risks of myelosuppression and cardiac damage, as well as toxicities, such as neuropathy, that may impact independence. The impact of chemotherapy on quality of life (QOL) outcomes appears significant but reversible in this population. Gene expression profiling, benefit and chemotherapy toxicity prediction tools integrating global health considerations hold promise to better inform chemotherapy decisions in this population. Benefits on targeted anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) agents is maintained in older EBC patients with a favourable safety profile. Endocrine therapy including aromatase inhibitors is the standard of care in this population, and extended treatment decisions should consider effects on bone health and life expectancy. More trials recruiting older adults with pragmatic designs and meaningful endpoints for this population are warranted to better inform systemic treatment decisions and discussion with patients.

Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab emtansine in older patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: a real-world study

INTRODUCTION

Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is an antibody-drug conjugate and its survival advantage has been shown in advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, clinical trials underrepresent patients ⩾65 years of age, leading to a lack of information in this population. We analyzed the real-world outcomes of older women who were treated with T-DM1 therapy.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter, observational, retrospective analysis of patients aged ⩾65 years treated with T-DM1. A total of 93 patients from 10 cancer centers were involved in the study. Our goal was to determine the survival, response rates, and toxicity profile in T-DM1-treated patients, as well as the factors that influence survival.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 12.2 months. Objective response rate was 29%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 8.47 and 15.0 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Score 2 was found to be an independent prognostic factor for worse PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.81, p = 0.032) and OS (HR 2.33, p = 0.006). Any adverse event (AE) was seen in 92.5% of patients; grade 3 or 4 AEs were seen in 30.1%. Dose reduction or treatment discontinuation rates were 11.8% and 6.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of T-DM1 was acceptable and it was generally well-tolerated among older patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.

Systemic therapy for early breast cancer in older adults: current status and prospects

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we describe the evidence on the efficacy and the safety of systemic treatments for the management of early breast cancer (EBC) in older individuals.

RECENT FINDINGS

Chemotherapy has a temporary impact on quality of life (QoL) for older EBC patients and improves survival outcomes for those with oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative disease. Benefits were seen also in the context of comorbidities, although these may be influenced by selection bias. The Cancer and Aging Research Group-Breast Cancer tool can predict the risk of severe toxicities on chemotherapy in older patients. Gene expression profiling is less frequently used in older adults although it holds promise to better inform patient selection also in this age group.Postneoadjuvant systemic therapy and novel agents remain poorly described in older patients with EBC. No disease-free survival benefits were seen in older patients receiving abemaciclib plus adjuvant endocrine therapy.

SUMMARY

Chemotherapy is beneficial for selected older patients with high-risk, ER-negative EBC. Although its impact on QoL is temporary, preferences, higher risk of toxicity and competing risks need to be carefully considered. Open questions remain on novel therapeutic approaches and gene expression profile in older EBC patients and more real-world evidence is warranted.

Quality of life for older patients with cancer: a review of the evidence supporting melatonin use

Purpose

The proportion of older populations living with cancer is on the increase. Maintaining or improving their quality of life (QoL) has become an important goal in the treatment of cancer and has become an endpoint in clinical trials. Melatonin regulates a wide variety of physiological functions and is involved in the initiation of sleep and the improvement of QoL. With age, the secretion of melatonin decreases and could lead to a deterioration in QoL.

Methods

Literature searches were conducted using the PubMed database. The search terms and derivatives of “metastatic cancer”, “older patients”, “quality of life” and “melatonin” were used. Titles and abstracts were screened to identify whether studies were relevant for full-text screening.

Results

There is major concern about the symptoms older cancer patients encounter during treatment because they can impact their QoL. Melatonin supplementation presents several benefits for older patients: improvement in survival, decrease in symptoms induced by cancer and cancer treatment, and also improvements in quality of life.

Conclusion

It therefore seems appropriate to study the impact of melatonin supplementation during cytotoxic therapy on QoL among elderly patients with metastatic cancer. The use of melatonin as a therapeutic strategy seems particularly suitable for elderly patients, a population known to secrete significantly less melatonin. However, to date, no studies have been conducted in this population.

The predictive value of G8 and the Cancer and aging research group chemotherapy toxicity tool in treatment-related toxicity in older Chinese patients with cancer

INTRODUCTION

Older patients experience a higher risk of treatment-related toxicity (TRT). The G8 screening tool was developed to separate cancer older patients fit to receive standard treatment from those who are frail and experiencing functional decline due to reduced organ function and multiple comorbidities. The Cancer and Aging Research Group chemotherapy toxicity tool (CARG-tt) questionnaire was developed to predict chemotherapy toxicity in geriatric patients. This prospective observational study evaluated the performance of G8 and CARG-tt in predicting severe TRT in older Chinese cancer patients.

METHODS

Chinese patients aged ≥65 with a diagnosis of solid malignancy and scheduled to receive anti-cancer treatment (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) were enrolled from March 2016 to July 2017 at the Department of Clinical Oncology at Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong. All patients completed the G8 and CARG-tt screening and pre-treatment assessments before starting treatment. Patients were monitored for any severe TRT, which was defined by grades 3-5 using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03, treatment discontinuation, or unexpected hospitalization from starting to 30 days after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients (male: 154, 59.5%; median age: 73.4, age range: 65-93) were enrolled in the study. Two hundred and ten (81.1%) patients received chemotherapy while the rest (n = 49, 18.9%) received targeted therapy. Overall, 146 patients (56.8%) experienced severe TRT. The mean G8 score was 12.4 (SD: 2.8). The G8 score had a significant association with unexpected admission (cutoff: 14, 41.3% vs. 26.5%, p = 0.03) but not significant in other types of TRTs. The mean CARG-tt score was 7.67 (SD: 3.7); it was not associated with severe TRTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The G8 and CARG-tt demonstrated a weak prediction of severe TRT in older Chinese cancer patients. Future studies need to develop predictive tools for TRT in patients receiving novel antineoplastic therapies, with a focus on subgroup analysis for different populations.

Adapting care for older cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) COVID-19 Working Group

The COVID-19 pandemic poses a barrier to equal and evidence-based management of cancer in older adults. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) formed a panel of experts to develop consensus recommendations on the implications of the pandemic on several aspects of cancer care in this age group including geriatric assessment (GA), surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatment, palliative care and research. Age and cancer diagnosis are significant predictors of adverse outcomes of the COVID-19 infection. In this setting, GA is particularly valuable to drive decision-making. GA may aid estimating physiologic reserve and adaptive capability, assessing risk-benefits of either providing or temporarily withholding treatments, and determining patient preferences to help inform treatment decisions. In a resource-constrained setting, geriatric screening tools may be administered remotely to identify patients requiring comprehensive GA. Tele-health is also crucial to ensure adequate continuity of care and minimize the risk of infection exposure. In general, therapeutic decisions should favor the most effective and least invasive approach with the lowest risk of adverse outcomes. In selected cases, this might require deferring or omitting surgery, radiotherapy or systemic treatments especially where benefits are marginal and alternative safe therapeutic options are available. Ongoing research is necessary to expand knowledge of the management of cancer in older adults. However, the pandemic presents a significant barrier and efforts should be made to ensure equitable access to clinical trials and prospective data collection to elucidate the outcomes of COVID-19 in this population.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of phase III randomised controlled trials for adjuvant therapy following resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)

BACKGROUND

Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have reported various systemic adjuvant therapy regimens following resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The most commonly applied include modified FOLFRINOX (mFFX), Gemcitabine/Capecitabine (GemCap) and S1, usually compared to gemcitabine (Gem) alone. However, many of these regimens have not been directly compared in RCTs. This network meta-analysis aims to characterise the impact of adjuvant therapies on overall and disease-free survival in patients having resection of PDAC.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) abstracts to identify published phase III RCTs articles up to 9th May 2019 that examined adjuvant systemic therapy in resected pancreatic cancer. Data including study characteristics and outcomes including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were extracted. Indirect comparisons of all regimens were simultaneously compared using random-effects network meta-analyses (NMA) which maintains randomisation within trials.

RESULTS

Twelve phase III RCTs involving 4947 patients and nine different regimens (5-Flourouracil/Folinic acid (5-FU/FA), Gemcitabine, Gemcitabine/Erlotinib (GemErl), GemCap), mFFX, S1, chemoradiotherapy (CRT), CRT with either 5-FU or Gemcitabine) were identified. S1 was ranked best for overall and disease-free survival followed by mFFX. Whilst there were no significant difference between S1 and mFFX for overall survival (mean difference: 1.6 months, p = 0.8), S1 had significantly longer disease-free survival than mFFX (mean difference: 2.8 months, p < 0.001). Furthermore, S1 was ranked best for lowest overall and haematological grade 3/4 toxicities.

CONCLUSION

This network meta-analysis demonstrates that chemotherapy with S1 or mFFX is superior to GemCap for adjuvant treatment for PDAC, improves survival after surgical resection and should be considered as reasonable standard treatment options in the adjuvant setting and as control arm for future adjuvant clinical trials.

Gamma Tocopherol Reduced Chemotherapeutic-Induced ROS in an Ovarian Granulosa Cell Line, But Not in Breast Cancer Cell Lines In Vitro

Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide are used to treat breast cancer, but they also cause infertility through off-target cytotoxicity towards proliferating granulosa cells that surround eggs. Each chemotherapeutic generates reactive oxygen species (ROS) but the effects of the combination, or the antioxidants alpha (αToc) and gamma tocopherol (γToc) on ROS in breast cancer or ovarian cells are unknown. Human breast cancer (MCF7, T47D) and ovarian cancer (OVCAR, COV434) cells were loaded with DCDFA and exposed (1, 2, 3, 24 h) to the MCF7-derived EC25 values of individual agents, or to combinations of these. ROS were quantified and viable cells enumerated using crystal violet or DAPI. Each chemotherapeutic killed ~25% of MCF7, T47D and OVCAR cells, but 57 ± 2% (doxorubicin) and 66 ± 2% (cyclophosphamide) of the COV434 granulosa cells. The combined chemotherapeutics decreased COV434 cell viability to 34 ± 5% of control whereas doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + γToc reduced ROS within 3 h (p < 0.01) and reduced cytotoxicity to 54 ± 4% (p < 0.05). αToc was not cytotoxic, whereas γToc killed ~25% of the breast cancer but none of the ovarian cells. Adding γToc to the combined chemotherapeutics did not change ROS or cytotoxicity in MCF7, T47D or OVCAR cells. The protection γToc afforded COV434 granulosa cells against chemotherapy-induced ROS and cytotoxicity suggests potential for fertility preservation.

Effect of Chemotherapeutics and Tocopherols on MCF-7 Breast Adenocarcinoma and KGN Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Lines In Vitro

The combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide commonly used to treat breast cancer can cause premature ovarian failure and infertility. α-Tocopherol is a potent antioxidant whereas γ-tocopherol causes apoptosis in a variety of cancer models in vitro including breast cancer. We hypothesised that the combination of doxorubicin (Dox) and 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4-Cyc) would be more cytotoxic in vitro than each agent alone, and that α-tocopherol would reduce and γ-tocopherol would augment the cytotoxicity of the combined chemotherapeutics. Human MCF-7 breast cancer and KGN ovarian cells were exposed to Dox, 4-Cyc, combined Dox and 4-Cyc, α-tocopherol, γ-tocopherol, or a combination of Dox and 4-Cyc with α-tocopherol or γ–tocopherol. Cell viability was assessed using a crystal violet assay according to four schedules: 24h exposure, 24h exposure + 24h culture in medium, 24h exposure + 48h culture in medium, or 72h continuous exposure. Supernatants from each separate KGN culture experiment (n=3) were examined using an estradiol ELISA. Dox was cytotoxic to both MCF-7 and KGN cells, but 4-Cyc only killed MCF-7 cells. γ-Tocopherol significantly decreased MCF-7 but not KGN cell viability. The combined chemotherapeutics and γ-tocopherol were more cytotoxic to MCF-7 than KGN cells, and α-tocopherol reduced the cytotoxicity of the combined chemotherapeutics towards KGN ovarian cells, but not MCF-7 cells. The addition of both γ-tocopherol and α-tocopherol to the chemotherapeutic combination of Dox and cyclophosphamide has the potential to increase in vitro chemotherapeutic efficacy against breast cancer cells whilst decreasing cytotoxicity towards ovarian granulosa cells.

Feasibility and efficiency of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a single agent or double agents vs radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of two centers

The incidence of elderly patients with esophageal cancer (OC) is increasing as the population ages. Until now, the treatment strategy in these patients has been unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficiency and tolerance of treatment with radiotherapy alone (RT alone), single‐agent‐based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT‐1), or double‐agent‐based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT‐2) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with OC. A total of 271 patients with OC aged 65 years or older were included in this study. The median overall survival (OS), median progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment‐related toxicities were assessed. The median OS time for all patients was 23.6 ± 2.3 months, with 2‐year survival rates of 48.0 ± 3.0%. The median PFS time was 13.6 ± 1.3 months with the 2‐year PFS rate was 33.0 ± 4.0%. Among patients who received CCRT‐1, better OS, and PFS were found in patients who received docetaxel than in patients received fluorouracil and platinum. In a subgroup analysis, 118 patients who underwent RT alone had a median OS time of 15.6 ± 1.9 months and median PFS time of 10.4 ± 0.9 months. The median OS time of patients who received CCRT‐1 was 28.8 ± 10.1 months compared with 27.8 ± 2.5 months for the patients treated with CCRT‐2 (P = 0.537). The similar results were observed for median PFS, with 16.5 ± 3.2 months in the CCRT‐1 group and 17.0 ± 2.0 months in the CCRT‐2 group (P = 0.321). Grade ≥3 leukocytopenia and grade ≥2 weight loss during treatment occurred in 40.6% and 17.9% of patients, respectively, in the CCRT‐2 group, which was higher than that observed in the CCRT‐1 group. Our results suggested that CCRT could be considered as an acceptable treatment for elderly patients with OC. The CCRT‐1 group presented with a lower incidence of treatment toxicities but comparable survival outcomes, compared to the CCRT‐2 group. Docetaxel was superior to fluorouracil and platinum in terms of OS.

Predicting 90-Day Mortality in Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Curative Surgery

Purpose: To propose a risk classification scheme for locoregionally advanced (Stages III and IV) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) by using the Wu comorbidity score (WCS) to quantify the risk of curative surgeries, including tumor resection and radical neck dissection. Methods: This study included 55,080 patients with LA-HNSCC receiving curative surgery between 2006 and 2015 who were identified from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database; the patients were classified into two groups, mortality (n = 1287, mortality rate = 2.34%) and survival (n = 53,793, survival rate = 97.66%), according to the event of mortality within 90 days of surgery. Significant risk factors for mortality were identified using a stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. The WCS was calculated using the relative risk of each risk factor. The accuracy of the WCS was assessed using mortality rates in different risk strata. Results: Fifteen comorbidities significantly increased mortality risk after curative surgery. The patients were divided into low-risk (WCS, 0–6; 90-day mortality rate, 0–1.57%), intermediate-risk (7–11; 2.71–9.99%), high-risk (12–16; 17.30–20.00%), and very-high-risk (17–18 and >18; 46.15–50.00%) strata. The 90-day survival rates were 98.97, 95.85, 81.20, and 53.13% in the low-, intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk patients, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001). The five-year overall survival rates after surgery were 70.86, 48.62, 22.99, and 18.75% in the low-, intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk patients, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The WCS is an accurate tool for assessing curative-surgery-related 90-day mortality risk and overall survival in patients with LA-HNSCC.

Frailty assessment predicts toxicity during first cycle chemotherapy for advanced lung cancer regardless of chronologic age

BACKGROUND

Improved assessment strategies are needed to individualize treatment for adults of all ages receiving palliative chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Our aim was to evaluate the utility of the Fried Frailty Index (FFI) and a cancer-specific geriatric assessment (GA) to predict chemotherapy toxicity and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We conducted a multi-site pilot study of 50 patients with newly diagnosed advanced NSCLC, age ≥ 18 years. All participants received carboplatin AUC 6, paclitaxel 200 mg/m² every 3 weeks. FFI and the GA were administered prior to chemotherapy. A GA toxicity risk score was calculated. Grade 3-5 toxicity was assessed during 1st two cycles of chemotherapy. OS was measured from chemotherapy initiation. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate the association between baseline characteristics and toxicity and OS respectively.

RESULTS

Among 50 participants, 48 received chemotherapy and were evaluable. The mean age was 68.5 y (range 42-86), 79% male, 85% KPS ≥80. The median OS was 8 months. Many (27%) met FFI criteria for frailty with ≥3 impairments. Impairments detected by the GA were common. In multivariable analyses both FFI ≥ 3 and GA toxicity risk score > 7 were independently associated with higher odds of toxicity (Odds ratio [OR] 7.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-44.6 and OR 4.3; 95% CI 1.0-17.7, respectively) in first cycle chemotherapy. Neither score was associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty predicts chemotherapy toxicity during first cycle. Frailty assessment may inform toxicity risk regardless of chronologic age.

Quality of life of elderly patients with solid tumours undergoing adjuvant cancer therapy: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The measurement of quality of life (QoL) in elderly cancer population is increasingly being recognised as an important element of clinical decision-making and the evaluation of treatment outcome. This systematic review aimed to summarise the evidence of QoL during and after adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted of studies published in CINAHL plus, CENTRAL, PubMed, PsycINFO and Web of Science from the inception of these databases to December 2016. Eligible studies included RCTs and non-RCTs in which QoL was measured in elderly patients (aged 65 years or above) with stage I-III solid tumours who were undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Because of the heterogeneity and the insufficient data among the included studies, the results were synthesised narratively.

RESULTS

We included 4 RCTs and 14 non-RCTs on 1785 participants. In all four RCTs, the risk of bias was low or unclear for most items but high for detection. Of the 14 non-RCTs, 5 studies were judged to have a low or moderate risk of bias for all domains, and the other 9 studies had a serious risk of bias in at least one domain. The bias was observed mainly in the confounding and in the selection of participants for the study. For most elderly patients with breast cancer, the non-significant negative change in the QoL was transient. A significant increase in the QoL during the course of temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma but a decreasing trend in QoL after radiotherapy was shown. This review also shows a uniform trend of stable or improved QoL during adjuvant therapy and at follow-up evaluations across the studies with prostate, colon or cervical cancer population.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy may not have detrimental effects on QoL in most elderly patients with solid tumours.

Pharmacokinetics of Chemotherapy in the Older Patient

Background

The number of individuals aged 65 years and older is growing rapidly, and the majority of cancers are diagnosed in this age group. Age-related changes in physiology can affect chemotherapy pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in older patients.

Methods

We review the literature regarding the impact of age on the pharmacokinetics of commonly used chemotherapy drugs and discuss age-related changes in physiology and pharmacology that can affect chemotherapy tolerance in older patients.

Results

The data on age-related changes in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics are conflicting. While a few studies report age-related differences in chemotherapy pharmacokinetics, most found no significant difference or subtle differences in pharmacokinetics with aging. A difference in pharmacodynamics was commonly seen, however, with older patients at increased risk of myelosuppression and toxicity from age-related decline in organ function. The majority of these studies were performed in a small cohort of patients, thus limiting the generalizability of these results.

Conclusions

Additional studies are needed to address the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cancer therapies in the older patient. Multicenter pharmacokinetic studies of adequate sample size, which include a thorough evaluation of physiologic factors and geriatric assessment parameters, would provide further insight into the factors affecting treatment tolerance. These studies would also help to guide appropriate chemotherapy dosing and interventions in order to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity in the older patient.

Association of pre-chemotherapy peripheral blood pro-inflammatory and coagulation factors with reduced relative dose intensity in women with breast cancer

Background

Chemotherapy decreases the risk of relapse and mortality in early-stage breast cancer (BC), but it comes with the risk of toxicity. Chemotherapy efficacy depends on relative dose intensity (RDI), and an RDI < 85% is associated with worse overall survival. The pro-inflammatory (interleukin (IL)-6, C-reactive protein (CRP)) and coagulation factors (D-dimer) serve as biomarkers of aging. The purpose of this study is to determine if these biomarkers are associated with reduced RDI in women with stage I–III BC.

Methods

This study enrolled women with stage I–III BC. Prior to adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy, peripheral blood was collected for biomarker measurement. Dose reductions and delays were captured and utilized to calculate the RDI delivered. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to describe the association between pre-chemotherapy IL-6, CRP, and D-dimer levels and an RDI < 85%, controlling for relevant tumor and patient factors (age, stage, receptor status, chemotherapy regimen, and pre-chemotherapy physical function and comorbidity).

Results

A total of 159 patients (mean age 58 years, range 30–81, SD 11.3) with stage I–III BC were enrolled. An RDI < 85% occurred in 22.6% (N = 36) of patients and was associated with higher pre-chemotherapy IL-6 (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04–1.25; p = 0.006) and D-dimer (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.27–4.24; p = 0.006) levels, increased age (p = 0.001), increased number of comorbidities (p = 0.01), and decreased physical function by the Medical Outcomes Survey Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale (p = 0.009) in univariate analysis. A multivariate model, including two biomarkers (IL-6 and D-dimer), age, ADL, BC stage, and chemotherapy regimen, demonstrated a significant association between the increased biomarkers and reduced RDI < 85% (OR 2.54; p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Increased pre-chemotherapy biomarkers of aging (IL-6 and D-dimer) are associated with reduced RDI (<85%). Future studies are underway to validate these findings.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01030250. Registered on 3 November 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-017-0895-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Pharmacogenomics, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics in the Era of Targeted Therapies

The complex nature of the pharmacologic aspects of cancer therapeutics has become more apparent in the past several years with the arrival of a cascade of target-based agents and the difficult challenge of bringing individualized precision medicine to oncology. Interpatient variability in drug action, singularly in novel agents, is in part caused by pharmacogenomic (PG), pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic (PD) factors, and drug selection and dosing should take this into consideration to optimize the benefit for our patients in terms of antitumor activity and treatment tolerance. In this regard, somatic genetic evaluation of tumors is useful in not only predicting response to initial targeted therapies but also in anticipating and guiding therapy after the development of acquired resistance; therapeutic drug monitoring of novel small molecules and monoclonal antibodies must be incorporated in our day-to-day practice to minimize the negative effect on clinical outcome of interindividual variability on pharmacokinetic processes of these drugs for all patients, but especially for fragile patient populations and those with organ dysfunction or comorbidities. For these populations, incorporating frailty assessment tools into trials of newer agents and validating frailty-based dose adjustment should be an important part of further drug development.

An update on adjuvant systemic therapy for elderly patients with early breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Elderly women with early breast cancer require an individualized approach to risk assessment and treatment. Unfortunately, there are limited data to inform optimal adjuvant therapy decisions in this population. Cytotoxic chemotherapy, biologic treatments and endocrine agents, while important in reducing breast cancer recurrence and mortality, are associated with the potential for adverse effects that may be of particular significance to elderly patients.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize the evidence for geriatric assessment in elderly patients with early breast cancer, outline special considerations for the use of chemotherapy and trastuzumab in older adults, and describe the age-specific risks of endocrine therapy in the adjuvant breast cancer setting.

EXPERT OPINION

The treatment of elderly women with early breast cancer should take into account cancer risk, life expectancy, comorbidities, functional status, physiologic changes, and patient values. Formal geriatric assessment may better inform treatment recommendations for individual patients. In general, there is no strong evidence to suggest that older women benefit less from standard adjuvant therapies than do their younger counterparts. When choosing between endocrine therapies, the differential risks associated with each agent should be considered and particular attention to the fracture risk on aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is warranted. Enrolment of women over 70 years of age into breast cancer clinical trials should be encouraged to better inform treatment guidelines.

Validation of a Prediction Tool for Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults With Cancer

PURPOSE

Older adults are at increased risk for chemotherapy toxicity, and standard oncology assessment measures cannot identify those at risk. A predictive model for chemotherapy toxicity was developed (N = 500) that consisted of geriatric assessment questions and other clinical variables. This study aims to externally validate this model in an independent cohort (N = 250).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients age ≥ 65 years with a solid tumor, fluent in English, and who were scheduled to receive a new chemotherapy regimen were recruited from eight institutions. Risk of chemotherapy toxicity was calculated (low, medium, or high risk) on the basis of the prediction model before the start of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-related toxicity was captured (grade 3 [hospitalization indicated], grade 4 [life threatening], and grade 5 [treatment-related death]). Validation of the prediction model was performed by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

The study sample (N = 250) had a mean age of 73 years (range, 65 to 94 [standard deviation, 5.8]). More than one half of patients (58%) experienced grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Risk of toxicity increased with increasing risk score (36.7% low, 62.4% medium, 70.2% high risk; P < .001). The area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.71), which was not statistically different from the development cohort (0.72; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.77; P = .09). There was no association between Karnofsky Performance Status and chemotherapy toxicity (P = .25).

CONCLUSION

This study externally validated a chemotherapy toxicity predictive model for older adults with cancer. This predictive model should be considered when discussing the risks and benefits of chemotherapy with older adults.

Toxicity of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer

Treatment with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, as currently given, causes cell damage by induction of double-strand DNA breaks. Because BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins play a role in the repair of DNA damage, the efficacy of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy may be increased in BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer patients. As a downside, acute chemotherapy-related toxicity may also be increased. We selected all female patients who were treated at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for primary or locoregional recurrence of breast cancer (PBC/LR) between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2014. The primary outcome was the relative total dose intensity (RTDI), calculated for anthracyclines and taxanes separately. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of febrile neutropenia, delay in chemotherapy administration, and switch to another chemotherapy regimen due to toxicity. In total, 701 patients treated for PBC/LR were eligible for data analyses, among which 85 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (n = 67 BRCA1 and n = 18 BRCA2). The mean RTDI for anthracyclines was not significantly different between both groups (98.7 % in the BRCA1/2, 96.6 % in the sporadic group, p = 0.27). Also the mean RTDI for taxanes was not significantly different between the groups (93.6 % in the BRCA1/2-associated, 90.0 % in the sporadic group, p = 0.12). Linear regression analysis revealed no significant effect of BRCA1/2 mutation carriership on the RTDIs. No significant differences were found in the percentages of patients presenting with febrile neutropenia, having a delay in chemotherapy administration or switching to an altered chemotherapy regimen. Additionally, the odds ratios showed no significant effect of BRCA1/2 mutation carriership on the secondary outcome variables. (Neo)adjuvant chemotherapy-related toxicity was not different between BRCA1/2-associated and sporadic breast cancer patients suggesting that the DNA damage repair mechanism of non-cancer cells with only one normal copy of either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene is sufficiently functional to handle acute chemotherapy-associated toxicity.

Effect of age on drug metabolism in women with breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The aging of the population will increase the number of breast cancer patients requiring treatment in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting. Hormones, chemotherapy and targeted drugs all have a role in treatment. Older patients have been underrepresented in clinical trials making evidence-based decisions difficult. The increase in comorbidity and aging, polypharmacy and changes in function make pharmacotherapy decisions more complicated. Knowledge of the issues is critical in the prescribing of effective and safe therapy. There are factors associated with advancing age that can result in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations in processing of hormonal agents, chemotherapy and targeted drugs.

AREAS COVERED

A review of the literature pertaining to pharmacokinetic changes in aging in breast cancer was untaken. Studies are reviewed involving single agents and some combinations.

EXPERT OPINION

Older patients should be considered for standard therapies. Their specific problems need to be evaluated by geriatric-specific assessment including functional status, end organ dysfunction and polypharmacy. There are few instances for age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and when present are usually not clinically significant. When changes are present, they are often the result of comorbidity, drug interactions and drug scheduling issues. The older patients may be more sensitive to certain toxicities such as cardiac toxicity, neuropathy and myelosuppression.

Pharmacokinetics of Selected Anticancer Drugs in Elderly Cancer Patients: Focus on Breast Cancer

Background: Elderly patients receiving anticancer drugs may have an increased risk to develop treatment-related toxicities compared to their younger peers. However, a potential pharmacokinetic (PK) basis for this increased risk has not consistently been established yet. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically review the influence of age on the PK of anticancer agents frequently administered to elderly breast cancer patients. Methods: A literature search was performed using the PubMed electronic database, Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and available drug approval reviews, as published by EMA and FDA. Publications that describe age-related PK profiles of selected anticancer drugs against breast cancer, excluding endocrine compounds, were selected and included. Results: This review presents an overview of the available data that describe the influence of increasing age on the PK of selected anticancer drugs used for the treatment of breast cancer. Conclusions: Selected published data revealed differences in the effect and magnitude of increasing age on the PK of several anticancer drugs. There may be clinically-relevant, age-related PK differences for anthracyclines and platina agents. In the majority of cases, age is not a good surrogate marker for anticancer drug PK, and the physiological state of the individual patient may better be approached by looking at organ function, Charlson Comorbidity Score or geriatric functional assessment.

The risk factors of toxicity during chemotherapy and radiotherapy in breast cancer patients according to the presence of BRCA gene mutation

Aim of the study

Treatment toxicity may decrease the treatment effectiveness due to the need to reduce the dose or increase the interval between cycles. The aim of this study was to distinguish the risk factors for treatment side effects in breast cancer patients and to assess the impact of BRCA1/2 mutations on the treatment toxicity.

Material and methods

The analysis was conducted on the medical history of 370 patients who were treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy between 2006 and 2012 in the Clinical Oncology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology in Gliwice in Poland (COI). All patients were tested for the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Results

In the studied group 13% (48) of the patients were BRCA mutation carriers. Neutropaenia after the first cycle of chemotherapy occurred more commonly in mutation carriers compared to non-carriers (29% vs. 10%), p = 0.0002. Radiotherapy acute skin toxicity was present in 3% of patients with similar rates in both groups, p = 0.950. Toxicity grade 3–4 was present more frequently in patients younger than 70 years (p = 0.02) of age, patients with viral hepatitis (p = 0.045), hypertension (p = 0.039), and cardiovascular disease (p = 0.044). Lower WBC count before treatment was observed more frequently in patients with neutropaenia (p = 0.002), especially in mutation carriers, p = 0.0015.

Conclusions

Risk factors for anthracycline-based chemotherapy side effects were: age below 70 years, lower WBC value at baseline, history of infectious diseases, hypertension, and cardiovascular comorbidity. The presence of BRCA mutations may be a risk factor for neutropaenia, but it did not affect radiotherapy toxicity.

Optimal management of the elderly patient with head and neck cancer: Issues regarding surgery, irradiation and chemotherapy

Head and neck cancer (HNC) represents the sixth most common malignancy and accounts for approximately 6% of new cancer cases annually worldwide. As life expectancy constantly increases, the onset of HNC in patients older than 65 years of age at diagnosis is not rare and up to one fourth of cases occurs in patients older that 70 years at age. Because elderly cancer patients are severely under-represented in clinical trials, there is a clear need to address the particular aspects of this specific patient group, especially in the context of novel multidisciplinary therapeutic approaches. The frailty of elderly patients with HNC is attributed to the high incidence of smoking and alcohol abuse in this malignancy and the presence of substantial cardiovascular, respiratory or metabolic comorbidities. In the current work, I provide an overview of current and emerging treatment approaches, in elderly patients with HNC. In particular, I discuss modern surgical approaches that improve radical excision rates while preserving functionality, the incorporation of modern radiotherapeutic techniques and the introduction of novel chemotherapeutic combinations and molecular targeted agents in an effort to reduce toxicity without compromising efficacy. Finally, there is an urgent need to increase accrual and active participation of elderly patients with HNC in clinical trials, including biomarker evaluation in biopsy specimens towards an individualized therapeutic approach.

Systematic review with network meta-analysis: adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer

BACKGROUND

Major adjuvant therapies for biliary tract cancer (BTC) include fluorouracil, gemcitabine and chemoradiation (CRT), but the optimum regimen remains inconclusive.

AIM

To compare these therapies in terms of patient survival rates after resection and toxic effects.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for controlled trials comparing the above three therapies with each other or observation alone until 31 January 2014. We estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) for death and odds ratios (ORs) for toxic effects among different therapies. Subgroup analyses based on positive lymph node or resection margin were also performed.

RESULTS

Twelve eligible articles were included. Gemcitabine improved 5-year survival (HR 2.12, 95% CI, confidence interval 1.23-4.02, P = 0.01), whereas fluorouracil (HR 1.61, 95% CI 0.74-3.67) and CRT (HR 1.55, 95% CI 0.82-3.32) provided a poorer survival outcome compared with gemcitabine after 1 year. Similarly, for 5-year survival rates, although differing, CRT did not provide a significant improvement in survival (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20-0.97) compared with gemcitabine. Fluorouracil did not appear to provide benefit over gemcitabine (HR 1.56, 95% CI 0.77-3.35). CRT was ranked highest for toxic effects including haematological (OR 5.45, 95% CI 0.01-483.85) and nonhaematological (OR 5.77, 95% CI 0.01-3807.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy with gemcitabine is the optimum adjuvant treatment with a balanced benefit-toxicity ratio for resected biliary tract cancer. Chemoradiation was more likely to cause toxic effects.

Effects of comorbidities and functional living activities on survival in geriatric breast cancer patients

AIM OF THE STUDY

We evaluated the possible effects of comorbid diseases and functional capacity on the survival of elderly female patients with breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 159 breast cancer patients aged 65 years or older. Functional status of the patients was evaluated using Katz's index of activities of daily living (ADL) and Lawton and Brody's Instrumental ADL (IADL) scale.

RESULTS

ADL-based evaluation revealed 121 patients (76.1%) were independent, 34 (21.4%) semi-dependent and 4 (2.5%) dependent whereas IADL-based evaluation showed 69 patients (43.4%) were independent, 67 patients (42.1%) semi-dependent and 23 patients (14.5%) dependent. Among the patients, 69 (43.4%) had one comorbid disease, 62 (39.0%) had two and 26 (16.4%) had three or more. Of the entire cohort, 60.4% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on ADL index, overall survival (OS) was significantly better in semi-dependent and independent patients than in dependent patients (p = 0.001). In the upfront non-metastatic patient subgroup, disease-free survival (DFS) was favourable in the independent patients according to ADL index (p = 0.001). Having more than one comorbid disease had an unfavourable effect on OS. In the multiple regression analysis of non-metastatic patients, stage, triple-negative histology and ADL index remained significant in terms of OS (p = 0.008, HR: 3.17, CI: 1.35-7.44; p = 0.027, HR: 2.78, CI: 1.172-6.91; and p = 0.006, HR: 0.29, CI: 0.12-0.70, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly patients with breast cancer, evaluation of daily living activities and comorbid diseases are as important as staging and subclassification of breast cancer in the determination of prognosis and survival.

Treatment options for early breast cancer in elderly women

In clinical practice, approximately 50% of new cases of breast cancer occur in women over the age of 65 years, although very few elderly women have been enrolled in the numerous randomized trials conducted so far. Notwithstanding less aggressive biologic features compared with younger patients, breast cancer impacts on mortality of elderly women, especially if not adequately treated. As confirmed by meta-analyses, hormonal therapy is the most effective adjuvant measure for patients with localized disease, whereas the decrease in the benefit of cytotoxic treatment with increased risk of toxicity make the decision on when and how to administer it a major challenge for the medical oncologist. Careful evaluation of biological prognostic factors, performance status and geriatric parameters, such as functional independence, comorbidities and cognitive function of the patient, along with determination of her life expectancy and preferences, represent the relevant information on which the oncologist should ground their decision for integrated treatment with conservative surgery, radiotherapy and hormonochemotherapy in otherwise healthy women, or attenuated or palliative measures for the frail patients, in order to maximize the balance of benefits and toxicities. The aims of this review are to summarize the most relevant concepts for decision making in the clinical practice and discuss the results of recent research concerning the additional needs of elderly women with early breast cancer.

Adjuvant treatments for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Major adjuvant treatments for pancreatic adenocarcinoma include fluorouracil, gemcitabine, chemoradiation, and chemoradiation plus fluorouracil or gemcitabine. Since the optimum regimen remains inconclusive, we aimed to compare these treatments in terms of overall survival after tumour resection and in terms of grade 3-4 toxic effects with a systematic review and random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, trial registries, and related reviews and abstracts for randomised controlled trials comparing the above five treatments with each other or observation alone before April 30, 2013. We estimated relative hazard ratios (HRs) for death and relative odds ratios (ORs) for toxic effects among different therapies by combining HRs for death and survival durations and ORs for toxic effects of included trials. We assessed the effects of prognostic factors on survival benefits of adjuvant therapies with meta-regression.

FINDINGS

Ten eligible articles reporting nine trials were included. Compared with observation, the HRs for death were 0·62 (95% credible interval 0·42-0·88) for fluorouracil, 0·68 (0·44-1·07) for gemcitabine, 0·91 (0·55-1·46) for chemoradiation, 0·54 (0·15-1·80) for chemoradiation plus fluorouracil, and 0·44 (0·10-1·81) for chemoradiation plus gemcitabine. The proportion of patients with positive lymph nodes was inversely associated with the survival benefit of adjuvant treatments. After adjustment for this factor, fluorouracil (HR 0·65, 0·49-0·84) and gemcitabine (0·59, 0·41-0·83) improved survival compared with observation, whereas chemoradiation resulted in worse survival than fluorouracil (1·69, 1·12-2·54) or gemcitabine (1·86, 1·04-3·23). Chemoradiation plus gemcitabine was ranked the most toxic, with significantly higher haematological toxic effects than second-ranked chemoradiation plus fluorouracil (OR 13·33, 1·01-169·36).

INTERPRETATION

Chemotherapy with fluorouracil or gemcitabine is the optimum adjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and reduces mortality after surgery by about a third. Chemoradiation plus chemotherapy is less effective in prolonging survival and is more toxic than chemotherapy.

FUNDING

None.

Important Role of the Dihydrouracil/Uracil Ratio in Marked Interpatient Variations of Fluoropyrimidine Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in patients causes severe toxicities in 5-fluorouracil/floxuridine (5-FU/FUDR) treatments. To determine the plasma dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (DUUR) as a potential index for setting 5-FU/FUDR doses, the authors conducted a prospective study on the relationships of the DUUR with 5-FU/FUDR pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Forty gestational trophoblastic tumor (GTT) patients were treated with 30 mg/kg of 5-FU or prodrug FUDR during a 10-day cycle. The pretreatment DUURs of the patients were determined prior to the treatments, and plasma 5-FU and FUDR concentrations on day 1 of the test cycle were measured to calculate the corresponding pharmacokinetic parameters. The absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and human chorionic gonadotrophins (HCG/beta-HCG) were recorded as the efficacy indexes. The correlation of the DUUR with pharmacokinetic parameters and efficacy indexes was analyzed to look for a relationship between individual doses (in milligrams) and the varied DUUR. Pretreatment DUUR was significantly correlated with the corresponding plasma AUC (r > 0.80, P < .01), the plasma drug clearance (r > 0.78, P < .01), the ANC (r > 0.76, P < 0.01), and the decrease of HCG/beta-HCG levels (r > 0.5, P < 0.01). In addition, the charts for setting 5-FU/FUDR doses were designed for further validation in clinical trials. These findings indicate the important roles of the DUUR in remarkable interpatient variations of fluoropyrimidine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and propose a better index for setting individual 5-FU/FUDR doses based on interpatient variations in DPD levels.

Outcomes of the oldest patients with primary CNS lymphoma treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Up to 20% of all primary CNS lymphoma (PCNLS) patients are aged 80 years or older, yet data are limited on how best to treat this rapidly growing population. Despite demographic pressures and the proven efficacy of methotrexate (MTX)-based regimens, automatic de-escalation of care based on age is standard practice outside of tertiary care centers. We performed a retrospective review of all PCNSL patients aged 80 years or older treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from 1993 to 2011. Demographic and clinical variables were evaluated as predictors of survival by multivariate analysis. Twenty-three of 24 patients were treated with chemotherapy (92% with high-dose MTX, typically in combination with vincristine and procarbazine). One patient received ocular radiation alone for disease limited to the eyes. Response to treatment was noted in 62.5% of patients; 9 (37.5%) had refractory disease. Median overall survival was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.8-53), and median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.4-29.5). Two-year survival rate was 33%; 3-year survival rate was 17%. Three patients lived more than 4 years postdiagnosis. Most patients tolerated therapy well, and despite low baseline creatinine clearance, no significant renal toxicity was noted. Response status and deep brain involvement were identified as the most important predictors of survival. Multidrug regimens containing high-dose MTX are feasible and efficacious among the oldest patients, particularly those who achieve a complete response by their fifth treatment cycle. Aggressive therapy should be offered to select patients irrespective of advanced age.

Are aging biomarkers clinically relevant in oncogeriatrics?

Immunosenescence and inflammaging have been depicted for long as age-related heterogeneous blood phenotypic changes ("immunoaging"). Some of them can be reproduced in animal models either by accelerating telomere shortening or by forcing DNA damage response. According to these models, "immunoaging" is the consequence of replicative senescence of hematopoietic stem cells. This increasing knowledge may impact oncogeriatrics in the future since (1) an increasing evidence links hematopoietic and cancer stem cells regulations; (2) immunosenescence may be linked to cancer immunotolerance and the increasing rate of cancer incidence with age; (3) immunoaging has a major consequence during cancer treatment, since it explains increased hematological toxicities observed in the elderly and (4) it favors secondary cancers and mainly hemopathies. For all these reasons, aging biomarkers, among which are telomere length peripheral blood sampling but also analyses of telomere-linked proteins like shelterin complex or DNA-damage markers will probably be clinically relevant in the future.

Adjuvant treatment of older patients with lung cancer

Although advances in the molecular biology of lung cancer have rapidly impacted management of patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the principal treatment in the adjuvant setting of early stage NSCLC remains platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. The evidence available from clinical trials demonstrates a similar benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in fit, older patients as well as younger patients. Observational studies suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients provides comparable survival benefit, along with increased toxicity. The lower use of chemotherapy in the older population also suggests that the selection of appropriate patients remains an important part of the decision process. Carboplatin therapy may be substituted for cisplatin in selected older patients, and different options exist for the second cytotoxic chemotherapy agent. As in all patients, and particularly in this vulnerable population receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, supportive care is vital. Increasing enrollment of the older population in clinical trials will be important to improve the evidence for our decision-making in the future.

Management of cancer in the older adult

Cancer incidence and mortality rise exponentially in the elderly. With the aging of the population there is an urgent need to address this issue with evidence-based guidelines. Delayed diagnosis and incomplete workup and treatment are well documented in this population. Incorporation of a geriatric evaluation in oncology practice should be routinely implemented to prevent adverse outcomes. Treatment decisions in the elderly should not be based solely on survival gains but should also take quality of life into consideration. Cancer treatment is safe and effective in the elderly population. Social issues and other comorbidities should be addressed to improve compliance and outcome. Many unanswered questions regarding the optimal management of elderly cancer patients can be addressed only with the new clinical trials. Eliminating age bias among health care providers by providing education will help achieve optimal care for the elderly with cancer.

Predicting the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older patients: the Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients (CRASH) score

BACKGROUND

Tools are lacking to assess the individual risk of severe toxicity from chemotherapy. Such tools would be especially useful for older patients, who vary considerably in terms of health status and functional reserve.

METHODS

The authors conducted a prospective, multicentric study of patients aged ≥70 years who were starting chemotherapy. Grade 4 hematologic (H) or grade 3/4 nonhematologic (NH) toxicity according to version 3.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events was defined as severe. Twenty-four parameters were assessed. Toxicity of the regimen (Chemotox) was adjusted using an index to estimate the average per-patient risk of chemotherapy toxicity (the MAX2 index). In total, 562 patients were accrued, and 518 patients were evaluable and were split randomly (2:1 ratio) into a derivation cohort and a validation cohort.

RESULTS

Severe toxicity was observed in 64% of patients. The Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients (CRASH) score was constructed along 2 subscores: H toxicity and NH toxicity. Predictors of H toxicity were lymphocytes, aspartate aminotransferase level, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living score, lactate dehydrogenase level, diastolic blood pressure, and Chemotox. The best model included the 4 latter predictors (risk categories: low, 7%; medium-low, 23%; medium-high, 54%; and high, 100%, respectively; P(trend) < .001). Predictors of NH toxicity were hemoglobin, creatinine clearance, albumin, self-rated health, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance, Mini-Mental Status score, Mini-Nutritional Assessment score, and Chemotox. The 4 latter predictors provided the best model (risk categories: 33%, 46%, 67%, and 93%, respectively; P(trend) < .001). The combined risk categories were 50%, 58%, 77%, and 79%, respectively; P(trend) < .001). Bootstrap internal validation and independent sample validation demonstrated stable risk categorization and P(trend) < .001.

CONCLUSIONS

The CRASH score distinguished several risk levels of severe toxicity. The split score discriminated better than the combined score. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first score systematically integrating both chemotherapy and patient risk for older patients and has a potential for future clinical application.

Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

Older adults are vulnerable to chemotherapy toxicity; however, there are limited data to identify those at risk. The goals of this study are to identify risk factors for chemotherapy toxicity in older adults and develop a risk stratification schema for chemotherapy toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients age ≥ 65 years with cancer from seven institutions completed a prechemotherapy assessment that captured sociodemographics, tumor/treatment variables, laboratory test results, and geriatric assessment variables (function, comorbidity, cognition, psychological state, social activity/support, and nutritional status). Patients were followed through the chemotherapy course to capture grade 3 (severe), grade 4 (life-threatening or disabling), and grade 5 (death) as defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

RESULTS

In total, 500 patients with a mean age of 73 years (range, 65 to 91 years) with stage I to IV lung (29%), GI (27%), gynecologic (17%), breast (11%), genitourinary (10%), or other (6%) cancer joined this prospective study. Grade 3 to 5 toxicity occurred in 53% of the patients (39% grade 3, 12% grade 4, 2% grade 5). A predictive model for grade 3 to 5 toxicity was developed that consisted of geriatric assessment variables, laboratory test values, and patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. A scoring system in which the median risk score was 7 (range, 0 to 19) and risk stratification schema (risk score: percent incidence of grade 3 to 5 toxicity) identified older adults at low (0 to 5 points; 30%), intermediate (6 to 9 points; 52%), or high risk (10 to 19 points; 83%) of chemotherapy toxicity (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

A risk stratification schema can establish the risk of chemotherapy toxicity in older adults. Geriatric assessment variables independently predicted the risk of toxicity.

Health care use and primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors

OBJECTIVES

We examined health care use in conjunction with primary prophylaxis use of colony stimulating factors (CSF) during patients' initial course of chemotherapy.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified adults aged 25 years and older with a diagnosis of breast, colorectal, or nonsmall cell lung cancer between 2002 and 2005 from the Western Washington Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Puget Sound registry. We linked these records to health insurance claims from four payers representing 75% of those insured in the state. Claims records were used to determine chemotherapy regimen type, CSF use, febrile neutropenia occurrences, and supportive care. Chemotherapy regimens were categorized as conferring high, intermediate, or low risk of myelosuppression according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. CSF use was described as primary prophylaxis, other, or none. Antibiotics and antifungal and antiviral agents per National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for supportive care for cancer infection were categorized using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System and National Drug Code assignments.

RESULTS

Use of CSF as primary prophylaxis is not significantly associated with a reduction in antibiotic use or inpatient or outpatient visits. Primary prophylactic CSF use was associated with less use of antiviral drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

CSF use is not associated with a reduction in health care use, with the exception of antiviral drug use. Given the expense associated with CSF use, pragmatic trials and additional research are needed to further assess the affects of CSF on health care use.