Influence of adjuvants on the induction of autoantibodies to the thyrotropin receptor

Role of cytokines in the pathogenesis and suppression of thyroid autoimmunity

Autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD) are one of the most common organ-specific autoimmune disorders, of which Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) and Graves' disease (GD) are 2 of the most common clinical expressions. HT is characterized by hypothyroidism that results from the destruction of the thyroid by thyroglobulin-specific T cell-mediated autoimmune response. In contrast, GD is characterized by hyperthyroidism due to excessive production of thyroid hormone induced by thyrotropin receptor-specific stimulatory autoantibodies. Cytokines play a crucial role in modulating immune responses that affect the balance between maintenance of self-tolerance and initiation of autoimmunity. However, the role of cytokines is often confusing and is neither independent nor exclusive of other immune mediators. A regulatory cytokine may either favor induction of tolerance against thyroid autoimmune disease or favor activation and/or exacerbation of autoimmune responses. These apparently contradictory functions of a given cytokine are primarily influenced by the nature of co-signaling delivered by other cytokines. Consequently, a thorough understanding of the role of a particular cytokine in the context of a specific immune response is essential for the development of appropriate strategies to modulate cytokine responses to maintain or restore health. This review provides a summary of recent research pertaining to the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of AITD with a particular emphasis on the therapeutic applications of cytokine modulation.

Animal Models of Graves' Hyperthyroidism

An animal model of Graves' disease (GD) will help us to clearly understand the role of thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR)-specific T cells and TSHR-Abs during the development of GD and to develop TSHR-specific immunotherapy. This review focuses on four different recent approaches towards the development of an animal model of GD. These approaches are: (1) Immunization of AKR/N mice with fibroblasts coexpressing syngeneic major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II and TSHR. (2) Immunization of selected strains of mice with an expression vector containing TSHR cDNA. (3) Immunization of BALB/c mice with syngeneic M12 cells or xenogenic HEK-293 cells expressing full-length or extracellular domain of TSHR (ETSHR). (4) Injection of adenovirus-expressing TSHR into BALB/c mice.

Insight into Graves' hyperthyroidism from animal models

Graves' hyperthyroidism can be induced in mice or hamsters by novel approaches, namely injecting cells expressing the TSH receptor (TSHR) or vaccination with TSHR-DNA in plasmid or adenoviral vectors. These models provide unique insight into several aspects of Graves' disease: 1) manipulating immunity toward Th1 or Th2 cytokines enhances or suppresses hyperthyroidism in different models, perhaps reflecting human disease heterogeneity; 2) the role of TSHR cleavage and A subunit shedding in immunity leading to thyroid-stimulating antibodies (TSAbs); and 3) epitope spreading away from TSAbs and toward TSH-blocking antibodies in association with increased TSHR antibody titers (as in rare hypothyroid patients). Major developments from the models include the isolation of high-affinity monoclonal TSAbs and analysis of antigen presentation, T cells, and immune tolerance to the TSHR. Studies of inbred mouse strains emphasize the contribution of non-MHC vs. MHC genes, as in humans, supporting the relevance of the models to human disease. Moreover, other findings suggest that the development of Graves' disease is affected by environmental factors, including infectious pathogens, regardless of modifications in the Th1/Th2 balance. Finally, developing immunospecific forms of therapy for Graves' disease will require painstaking dissection of immune recognition and responses to the TSHR.

Adjuvants and Antibody Production: Dispelling the Myths Associated with Freund's Complete and Other Adjuvants

Adjuvants have been used for more than 70 yr to enhance the immune response of the host animal to an antigen. Among the mechanisms that adjuvants use to enhance the immune response are the "depot" effect, antigen presentation, antigen targeting, immune activation/modulation, and cytotoxic lymphocyte induction. The immunostimulatory properties of adjuvants result in inflammation, tissue destruction, and the potential for resulting pain and distress in the host animal. The inflammatory lesions produced by adjuvants such as Freund's complete adjuvant (FCA) have led some to conclude that pain and distress are present, even in cases where the scientific evidence fails to support this conclusion. Recommendations and regulations in the literature, based on available scientific evidence, provide guidance on total adjuvant volumes, volumes per site, routes of injection, booster injections, and adjuvants used for antibody production. Among the numerous adjuvants that are used for experimental antibody production reviewed in this article, many claim to be less inflammatory, tissue destructive, and painful than FCA while producing equal or superior antibody responses. Although no adjuvant surpasses FCA for experimental antibody production against a wide range of antigenic molecules, many produce excellent antibody responses with less inflammation and tissue destruction. Balancing the requisite degree of immuno-stimulation and the extent of inflammation, necrosis, and potential pain and distress requires consideration of the nature of the antigen, the host immune responsiveness, the adjuvant's mechanisms of action, and the desired end-product. In cases where the antigen is a weak immunogen or has a very limited availability, the type and role of adjuvant becomes a critical component in producing an acceptable immune response and humoral antibody response.

Comparison of immune responses to extracellular domains of mouse and human thyrotropin receptor

The mouse and human thyrotropin receptors show greater than 87% homology in their amino acid sequences. However, glycosylated extracellular domains of mouse (mET-gp) and human (hET-gp) thyrotropin receptors showed differences in their ability to react with patient autoantibodies to thyrotropin receptor (TSHR). To test for potential differences in their immunogenicity, we immunized BALB/c mice with either gel pure non-glycosylated ectodomain of human TSHR (ETSHR II), or hET-gp (hET-gp III), or mET-gp (mET-gp III). Alternatively, mice were primed with gel pure hET-gp or mET-gp and subsequently immunized with insect cells expressing hET-gp (hET-gp II) or mET-gp (mET-gp II) respectively. All groups of mice immunized with TSHR developed high titers of antibodies against the respective immunogens. As shown earlier, sera obtained from mice immunized with ETSHR showed strong reactivity to peptide 1 (aa 22-41) and weak reactivity to peptides 23 (aa 352-371), 24 (aa 367-386), 25 (aa 382-401), and 26 (aa 397-415). Mice immunized with hET-gp or mET-gp showed comparable titers to peptides 1 and 23 and lower reactivity to other peptides. Mice immunized with hET-gp showed higher TBII reactivity (52.2%) compared to mice immunized with either ETSHR (20.9%) or mET-gp (34.5%). Peptides from the C-terminal region of ETSHR could neutralize the TBII activities of sera from mice immunized with ETSHR or hET-gp but not mET-gp. Compared to corresponding control mice, T4 levels in mET-gp II mice were only marginally higher. These data suggested that outcome of immunization with mouse ETSHR is comparable to that seen after immunization with human ETSHR.