Clinical effect of hormonal replacement therapy with estradiol associated with noretisterone or drospirenone. A prospective randomized placebo controlled study

Effect of hormone therapy on blood pressure and hypertension in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Menopausal hormone therapy (HT) includes a wide variety of hormonal compounds, and its effect on blood pressure is still uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess evidence regarding the effect of HT on blood pressure in postmenopausal women and its association with arterial hypertension.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials and prospective observational studies. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and the incidence of hypertension were assessed. All stages were independently performed by two reviewers. For blood pressure outcome, standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated as effect measures. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. The results are presented based on the HT type. The incidence of hypertension was compared using descriptive analyses.

FINDINGS

Eleven studies were included with 81,041 women evaluated, of which 29,812 used HT. The meta-analysis, conducted with 8 studies and 1,718 women, showed an increase in SBP with the use of oral conjugated equine estrogens plus progestogen (SMD = 0.60 mm Hg, 95% CI = 0.19 to 1.01). However, oral or transdermal use of estradiol plus progestogen (SMD = -2.00 mm Hg, 95% CI = -7.26 to 3.27), estradiol alone, and tibolone did not show any significant effect. No significant effect on DBP was observed for any formulation. Women who used oral estrogen plus progestogen had a higher risk of incident hypertension than those who never used it.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The effect of HT on blood pressure is influenced by the formulation used, especially the type of estrogen. The combined formulations of conjugated equine estrogens plus progestogen increased SBP and the risk of hypertension, which was not observed among estradiol plus progestogen, estradiol alone, and tibolone users.

The effect of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate on blood pressure and inflammation markers: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have explored the impact of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate administration on blood pressure and inflammation markers, however, their findings have often been contradictory. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to assess the effects of this drug combination on systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant published RCTs. The pooled mean change and standard deviation (SD) of the outcomes were calculated using the STATA software (version 14) for Statistical Computing.

RESULTS

A total of 18 publications were included in the current meta-analysis. In total, there were 12 RCT arms on SBP, 12 RCT arms on DBP, and 6 RCT arms on CRP levels. The administration of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate intake increased SBP (WMD: 3.48 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.73, 6.23, P = 0.013), particularly in subjects aged ≥ 60 years (WMD: 5.89 mmHg, 95% CI: 1.71, 10.07, P = 0.006) or with a body mass index (BMI) < 30 kg/m² (WMD: 6.55 mmHg, 95% CI: 2.64, 10.46, P = 0.012), as well as in the RCTs which lasted ≥ 6 months (WMD: 6.47 mmHg, 95% CI: 3.03, 9.90, P < 0.001),when 17β-estradiol dosages were ≥ 2 mg/day (WMD: 4.12 mmHg, 95% CI: 1.03, 7.22, P = 0.009; I² = 99%, P < 0.001) and in RCTs conducted on healthy postmenopausal women (WMD: 4.22 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.43, 8.01, P = 0.02; I² = 94%, P < 0.001). DBP decreased following this drug combination in the RCTs which lasted < 6 months (WMD: -1.42 mmHg, 95% CI: -2.27, -0.57, P = 0.001). CRP concentrations increased following the use of this drug combination (WMD: 1.01 mg/L, 95% CI: 0.62, 1.41, P < 0.001), especially in participants aged < 60 years (WMD: 1.22 mg/L, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.68, P < 0.001) or with a BMI < 30 kg/m² (WMD: 0.97 mg/L, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.27, P < 0.001), as well as in RCTs with a duration of ≥ 6 months (WMD: 1.15 mg/L, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.73, P < 0.001), when 17β-estradiol dosages were ≥ 2 mg/day (WMD: 0.97 mg/L, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.27, P < 0.001; I² = 55%, P = 0.107) and in RCTs conducted on healthy postmenopausal women (WMD: 1.22 mg/L, 95% CI: 0.77, 1.68, P < 0.001; I² = 90%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The administration of 17β-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate increases SBP and CRP concentrations and, when prescribed for less than 6 months, decreases DBP. However, despite being statistically significant, the impact of this drug combination on SBP and DBP is not clinically relevant as the variation in blood pressure values was low.

Pharmacological and metabolic effects of drospirenone as a progestin-only pill compared to combined formulations with estrogen

The spironolactone derivative drospirenone is combined with ethinylestradiol or estetrol in combined oral contraceptives. Formulations with 17-β-estradiol are used to treat climacteric symptoms. A drospirenone-only formulation has been introduced for contraception. Here, the pharmacological properties of drospirenone, the impact of the different formulations on metabolic and laboratory parameters, and the resulting clinical implications are reviewed. Ethinylestradiol, an inhibitor of CYP metabolic enzymes, changes the pharmacokinetics of drospirenone, leading to a higher drospirenone exposure with ethinylestradiol/drospirenone compared to the drospirenone-only preparation. In addition, several metabolic alterations have been described. The impact of estetrol is less pronounced, and for 17-β-estradiol/drospirenone and drospirenone-only, decreased triglyceride and cholesterol levels were observed. Ethinylestradiol induces various pro-coagulatory factors, leading to hypercoagulability. The effect is significantly reduced with estetrol, and no influence was observed with the drospirenone-only preparation. The anti-mineralocorticoid activity of drospirenone seems to positively counteract the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system-activating action of ethinylestradiol. There is no influence on blood pressure with ethinylestradiol/drospirenone and estetrol/drospirenone formulations, while in clinical trials, a reduction has been observed with 17-β-estradiol/drospirenone and drospirenone-only. Anti-aldosterone activity via non-renal mineralocorticoid receptors is associated with cardiovascular health, while interactions with parathyroid hormone signaling impact bone structure and vascular calcification. Though the clinical relevance is unclear for drospirenone, data in this context are reviewed. To sum up, the advantages of drospirenone in hormonal contraception and treatment of menopausal symptoms have been demonstrated for all the formulations described here. Combination with estrogen confers benefits and risks, which must be considered.

Anti-osteoporosis treatments changed body composition in postmenopausal women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether the widespread anti-osteoporosis treatments in postmenopausal women also benefit the change of body composition (lean body mass [LBM] and body fat mass [FM]) remains controversial. In order to solve this issue and find out the most effective treatment, we conducted this meta-analysis.

METHODS

We searched the literature, via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane to screen citations from inception to March 26, 2022, for inclusion in this study. Only clinical trials that used anti-osteoporosis treatments in postmenopausal women and displayed the alteration of body composition were included. Stata 14.0 was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis results presented that: compared with placebo, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was associated with increased LBM (standardized mean differences [SMD] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.02-0.61) and reduced FM (SMD = -0.30, 95% CI = -0.51 to -0.09) in postmenopausal women. Compared with placebo, physical exercise training showed an effect of decreasing FM (SMD = -0.66, 95% CI = -0.94 to -0.38) but not significant influence LBM (SMD = 1.31, 95% CI = -0.29 to 2.91). The network meta-analysis of our study showed that oral estrogen and progestogen plus exercise (OEPE) treatment might be the most effective anti-osteoporosis treatment (surface under the cumulative ranking curve 99.9) to reduce FM in postmenopausal women.

CONCLUSIONS

anti-osteoporosis treatments, especially HRT, affect body composition. Furthermore, the combination of HRT and exercise training are the most effective treatment to reduce FM while maintaining LBM.

Quality of life of patients with bilateral oophorectomy before the age of 45 for the treatment of endometriosis

INTRODUCTION

The study aimed to evaluate the quality of life and associated factors among women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy (BO) before the age of 45 for the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study was carried out in 52 women who were treated from January 2014 to December 2019 in 2 public and private DIE surgical centers in Toulouse. All women answered the Menopausal Quality of Life questionnaire (MenQOL). Mean MenQOL scores were compared according to age at BO, smoking, BMI, level of education, delay between BO and the survey and post-BO hormone replacement therapy (HRT) using Mann-Whitney and Anova tests. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlations between all the MEnQOL domain scores and clinical variables. The variables associated with the outcomes in univariate analyses with p < 0.2 were jointly evaluated using multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of the survey was 43.4 ± 3.4 years while the mean age at BO was 40.5 ± 3.4 years. The mean MenQOL score was 3.96 (± 1.45), with the highest scores in the sexual (4.77) and vasomotor (4.01) domains. BMI and smoking were independently and significantly associated with the mean total MenQOL score, all domain scores being significantly higher in overweight/obese women. A trend towards worse MenQOL scores was found in patients who had BO before the age of 41. We did not find any difference according to whether or not they were taking HRT.

CONCLUSION

This is a first study evaluating quality of life in a specific population of oophorectomized women under the age of 45 using MenQOL for DIE. While BO is effective in relieving pain in women with severe DIE, the induced premature menopause is associated with a poor quality of life, which deserves further attention.

Hormone therapy in the postmenopausal years: considering benefits and risks in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Menopausal symptoms can be very distressing and considerably affect a woman's personal and social life. It is becoming more and more evident that leaving bothersome symptoms untreated in midlife may lead to altered quality of life, reduced work productivity and, possibly, overall impaired health. Hormone therapy (HT) for the relief of menopausal symptoms has been the object of much controversy over the past two decades. At the beginning of the century, a shadow was cast on the use of HT owing to the concern for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks, and breast cancer, arising following publication of a large randomized placebo-controlled trial. Findings of a subanalysis of the trial data and extended follow-up studies, along with other more modern clinical trials and observational studies, have provided new evidence on the effects of HT.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The goal of the following paper is to appraise the most significant clinical literature on the effects of hormones in postmenopausal women, and to report the benefits and risks of HT for the relief of menopausal symptoms.

SEARCH METHODS

A Pubmed search of clinical trials was performed using the following terms: estrogens, progestogens, bazedoxifene, tibolone, selective estrogen receptor modulators, tissue-selective estrogen complex, androgens, and menopause.

OUTCOMES

HT is an effective treatment for bothersome menopausal vasomotor symptoms, genitourinary syndrome, and prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Women should be made aware that there is a small increased risk of stroke that tends to persist over the years as well as breast cancer risk with long-term estrogen-progestin use. However, healthy women who begin HT soon after menopause will probably earn more benefit than harm from the treatment. HT can improve bothersome symptoms, all the while conferring offset benefits such as cardiovascular risk reduction, an increase in bone mineral density and a reduction in bone fracture risk. Moreover, a decrease in colorectal cancer risk is obtainable in women treated with estrogen-progestin therapy, and an overall but nonsignificant reduction in mortality has been observed in women treated with conjugated equine estrogens alone or combined with estrogen-progestin therapy. Where possible, transdermal routes of HT administration should be preferred as they have the least impact on coagulation. With combined treatment, natural progesterone should be favored as it is devoid of the antiapoptotic properties of other progestogens on breast cells. When beginning HT, low doses should be used and increased gradually until effective control of symptoms is achieved. Unless contraindications develop, patients may choose to continue HT as long as the benefits outweigh the risks. Regular reassessment of the woman's health status is mandatory. Women with premature menopause who begin HT before 50 years of age seem to have the most significant advantage in terms of longevity.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

In women with bothersome menopausal symptoms, HT should be considered one of the mainstays of treatment. Clinical practitioners should tailor HT based on patient history, physical characteristics, and current health status so that benefits outweigh the risks.

Sex hormone-like Effects of Icariin on T-cells immune modulation in spontaneously hypertensive rats

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Epimedium brevicornu Maxim as a Chinese herb, is recommended for the treatment of menopausal women with hypertension for 50 years. Icariin, as the main hydrophilic ingredient of Epimedium brevicornu Maxim, has been proven to be a plant sex hormone and lower blood pressure down. Here, we hypothesized that Icariin can regulate T cells differentiation which leads to the blood pressure decrease in castrated SHR rats.

AIM OF THE STUDY

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of the exogenous estrogen, androgen and Icariin on T-cell modulation in hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two weeks after castration, both male and female SHR rats were given estradiol, testosterone, and Icariin intervention respectively. Body weight, blood pressure, and heart rate were tested weekly. After six weeks, proportion of T helper cells (Th), cytotoxic T cells (Tc), and regulatory T cells (Tregs) in both peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and splenocytes were tested by flowcytometry. Serum levels of estrogen, testosterone, AngII, TNF-α, IL-17 were tested by Elisa. Aortic arches were isolated for HE and Masson staining. The expressions of ERβ and AR in aorta were tested by Western-blot.

RESULTS

In both male and female SHR rats, we found that Icariin and estradiol lower blood pressure, but testosterone elevates blood pressure. Similar as testosterone, Icariin can attenuate Tc and Th proportions and elevate Tregs proportion in both peripheral blood and splenocyte in male SHR, which can be blunt by flutamide. Besides, Icariin performs similar function as estradiol that attenuates Tc proportions and elevates Tregs proportion in both peripheral blood and splenocytes in female SHR, which leads to the lower blood pressure and can be partly blunt by fulvestrant. Testosterone increases AngII and TNF-α levels in serum, leading to the higher blood pressure in both male and female SHR rats.

CONCLUSION

These results verified that Icariin, as a plant sex hormone, can regulate T cells differentiation related to blood pressure decrease in SHR rats.

Norethisterone and its acetate - what's so special about them?

INTRODUCTION

Progestogens (progestins) are widely used for contraception, in postmenopausal hormone therapy, and in treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding and endometriosis. Norethisterone (NET) and its acetate (NETA) differ from other progestogens by their partial conversion to ethinylestradiol (EE). We review their special characteristics and focus on the clinically relevant risk factors associated with estrogen action, such as migraine with aura and risk of thrombosis.

METHODS

Narrative review based on a medical literature (OvidMedline and PubMed) search.

RESULTS

NET converts to significant amounts of EE; 10-20 mg NET corresponds to 20-30 µg EE. The effects of NET on the endometrium are pronounced, making it a good choice for treating abnormal uterine bleeding, endometriosis, and endometrial hyperplasia. NET also has beneficial effects on bone mineral density and positive or neutral effects on cardiovascular health. Conversely, long-term use of NET is associated with a slightly increased breast cancer risk, and the risk of venous thromboembolism is moderately increased. This risk seems to be dose-dependent; contraceptive use carries no risk, but therapeutic doses might be associated with an increased risk. Studies suggest an association between combinations of EE and progestogens and ischaemic stroke, which in particular concerns women with migraine. No studies have, however, assessed this risk related to the therapeutic use of NET.

CONCLUSIONS

NET is a potent progestogen, especially when considering the endometrium. Its partial conversion to EE, however, is important to remember. Clinical consideration is required with women at high risk for either breast cancer or thromboembolism, or experiencing migraine with aura.

Effects of Bushen Yiqi Huoxue Decoction () in Treatment of Patients with Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To explore the therapeutic effect of Bushen Yiqi Huoxue Decoction ( BYHD) in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR).

METHODS

A total of 180 patients with DOR diagnosed from December 2013 to December 2014 were equally assigned into progynova and duphaston (E+D) group, Zuogui Pill () group and BYHD group with 60 cases in each by computerized randomization. Patients received E+D, Zuogui Pill or BYHD for 12 months, respectively. Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E₂), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian volume, endometrial thickness, and the resistance indices (RIs) of ovarian arteries and uterine arteries were observed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Nine women (4 from the E+D group, 3 from the Zuogui Pill group, and 2 from the BYHD group) withdrew from the study. After 6 months, Zuogui Pill and BYHD significantly decreased FSH and LH and increased endometrial thickness and AMH (all P<0.01). BYHD also resulted in E₂ elevation (P<0.05), ovary enlargement (P<0.05), AFC increase (P<0.01), and RI of ovarian arteries decrease (P<0.05). After 12 months, further improvements were observed in the Zuogui Pill and BYHD groups (all P<0.01), but BYHD showed better outcomes, with lower FSH, larger ovaries and a thicker endometrium compared with the Zuogui Pill group (all P<0.01). However, E+D only significantly increased endometrial thickness (P<0.01) and no significant improvements were observed in the RI of uterine arteries in the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

BYHD had a favorable therapeutic effect in patients with DOR by rebalancing hormone levels, promoting ovulation, and repairing the thin endometrium. The combination of tonifying Shen (Kidney), benefiting qi and activating blood circulation may be a promising therapeutic strategy for DOR.

Menopausal hyperinsulinism and hypertension - new approach

Aim: to test effects of estradiol (E2) 1 mg and drospirenone (DRSP) 2 mg in treatment of normal weight menopausal women with typical menopausal symptoms, hyperinsulinism, and grade I hypertension.Material and methods: The participants were 133 menopausal women, mean age 51.82 ± 3.25 years, body mass index (BMI) 24.9 ± 2.6 kg/m², waist/hip 0.80 ± 0.05, amenorrhoeic period 2.12 ± 2.10 years. All patients were treated with E2 1 mg and DRSP 2 mg during 12 months period. Blood samples were taken at 8 am before and during 12 months of therapy for: glycemia, lipids, hormonal analysis, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), E2, testosterone (T), prolactin (PRL), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG). Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed with 75 g glucose in order to assess insulin secretion. All had grade I hypertension 24 h blood pressure monitoring was performed before and after 12 months of therapy.Results: E2/DRSP significantly decreased total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) and apolipoprotein A (ApoA). Insulin area under the curve (AUC) significantly decreased (6586.1 ± 4194.2 vs. 5315.3 ± 2895.0, p < .05) and homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) (3.53 ± 2.18 vs. 3.0 ± 1.8, p < .05). FSH, LH decreased, E2 increased significantly. Of 24 h day blood pressure decreased significantly.Conclusions: E2/DRSP represents suitable therapy for hyperinsulinemic, grade I hypertensive menopausal women with typical symptoms and normal weight.

A heartfelt message, estrogen replacement therapy: use it or lose it

The issue of cardiovascular and cognitive health in women is complex. During the premenopausal phase of life, women have healthy blood pressure levels that are lower than those of age-matched men, and they have less cardiovascular disease. However, in the postmenopausal stage of life, blood pressure in women increases, and they are increasingly susceptible to cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairments, and dementia, exceeding the incidence in men. The major difference between pre- and postmenopausal women is the loss of estrogen. Thus, it seemed logical that postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy, with or without progestin, generally referred to as menopausal hormone treatment (MHT), would prevent these adverse sequelae. However, despite initially promising results, a major randomized clinical trial refuted the benefits of MHT, leading to its falling from favor. However, reappraisal of this study in the framework of a "critical window," or "timing hypothesis," has changed our perspective on the benefit-to-risk ratio of MHT, and this review discusses the historical, current, and future approaches to MHT.

Effects of different menopausal hormone replacement regimens on body composition in Chinese women

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different menopausal hormone therapy regimens on body composition in healthy postmenopausal Chinese women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty-three healthy postmenopausal Chinese women were randomly assigned to either group A (0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogens [CEE] plus 100 mg micronized progesterone [MP]), group B (0.3 mg CEE plus 100 mg MP), or group C (0.625 mg CEE plus 10 mg dydrogesterone). Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

One hundred and two women completed the trial at 1 year. A small but significant gain in lean body mass (619 ± 1019 g, p = 0.002) and a decrease of fat mass in all separate regions was observed in group A. A significant shift from gynoid to android fat distribution was observed in group B and group C (android/gynoid fat percentage ratios increased by 0.06 ± 0.08, p = 0.000 and 0.03 ± 0.08, p = 0.018, respectively), whereas no significant change was observed in group A (0.02 ± 0.06, p = 0.103).

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy postmenopausal Chinese women, 0.625 mg of CEE combined with 100 mg of MP was associated with a more favorable fat distribution compared with 0.3 mg CEE plus 100 mg MP or 0.625 mg CEE plus 10 mg dydrogesterone.

Long-term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND: Hormone therapy (HT) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and dementia in older women. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005. OBJECTIVES: To assess effects of long-term HT (at least 1 year's duration) on mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, cancer, gallbladder disease, fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases to September 2016: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. We searched the registers of ongoing trials and reference lists provided in previous studies and systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised double-blinded studies of HT versus placebo, taken for at least 1 year by perimenopausal or postmenopausal women. HT included oestrogens, with or without progestogens, via the oral, transdermal, subcutaneous or intranasal route. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) for continuous data, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We assessed the quality of the evidence by using GRADE methods. MAIN RESULTS: We included 22 studies involving 43,637 women. We derived nearly 70% of the data from two well-conducted studies (HERS 1998; WHI 1998). Most participants were postmenopausal American women with at least some degree of comorbidity, and mean participant age in most studies was over 60 years. None of the studies focused on perimenopausal women.In relatively healthy postmenopausal women (i.e. generally fit, without overt disease), combined continuous HT increased the risk of a coronary event (after 1 year's use: from 2 per 1000 to between 3 and 7 per 1000), venous thromboembolism (after 1 year's use: from 2 per 1000 to between 4 and 11 per 1000), stroke (after 3 years' use: from 6 per 1000 to between 6 and 12 per 1000), breast cancer (after 5.6 years' use: from 19 per 1000 to between 20 and 30 per 1000), gallbladder disease (after 5.6 years' use: from 27 per 1000 to between 38 and 60 per 1000) and death from lung cancer (after 5.6 years' use plus 2.4 years' additional follow-up: from 5 per 1000 to between 6 and 13 per 1000).Oestrogen-only HT increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (after 1 to 2 years' use: from 2 per 1000 to 2 to 10 per 1000; after 7 years' use: from 16 per 1000 to 16 to 28 per 1000), stroke (after 7 years' use: from 24 per 1000 to between 25 and 40 per 1000) and gallbladder disease (after 7 years' use: from 27 per 1000 to between 38 and 60 per 1000) but reduced the risk of breast cancer (after 7 years' use: from 25 per 1000 to between 15 and 25 per 1000) and clinical fracture (after 7 years' use: from 141 per 1000 to between 92 and 113 per 1000) and did not increase the risk of coronary events at any follow-up time.Women over 65 years of age who were relatively healthy and taking continuous combined HT showed an increase in the incidence of dementia (after 4 years' use: from 9 per 1000 to 11 to 30 per 1000). Among women with cardiovascular disease, use of combined continuous HT significantly increased the risk of venous thromboembolism (at 1 year's use: from 3 per 1000 to between 3 and 29 per 1000). Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use.Risk of fracture was the only outcome for which strong evidence showed clinical benefit derived from HT (after 5.6 years' use of combined HT: from 111 per 1000 to between 79 and 96 per 1000; after 7.1 years' use of oestrogen-only HT: from 141 per 1000 to between 92 and 113 per 1000). Researchers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinically meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer.One trial analysed subgroups of 2839 relatively healthy women 50 to 59 years of age who were taking combined continuous HT and 1637 who were taking oestrogen-only HT versus similar-sized placebo groups. The only significantly increased risk reported was for venous thromboembolism in women taking combined continuous HT: Their absolute risk remained low, at less than 1/500. However, other differences in risk cannot be excluded, as this study was not designed to have the power to detect differences between groups of women within 10 years of menopause.For most studies, risk of bias was low in most domains. The overall quality of evidence for the main comparisons was moderate. The main limitation in the quality of evidence was that only about 30% of women were 50 to 59 years old at baseline, which is the age at which women are most likely to consider HT for vasomotor symptoms. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT, provided they do not have specific contraindications. HT may be unsuitable for some women, including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease, increased risk of thromboembolic disease (such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis) or increased risk of some types of cancer (such as breast cancer, in women with a uterus). The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented.HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia, nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women. Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis, it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable. Data are insufficient for assessment of the risk of long-term HT use in perimenopausal women and in postmenopausal women younger than 50 years of age.

Effect of combined drospirenone with estradiol for hypertensive postmenopausal women: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Postmenopausal hypertensive is associated with estrogen deficiency. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of drospirenone combined with 17-β-estradiol (DRSP/E2) in postmenopausal hypertensive women. A systemic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (up to Oct. 2015) was performed. Studies were screened independently by two researchers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria which included only the randomized controlled trials (RCT) about the drospirenone with 17-β-estradiol for postmenopausal women with hypertension. The methodological quality was evaluated by Cochrane handbook 5.1.0 and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3.0 software. Five randomized controlled trials involved 1121 patients who met the eligibility criteria. Overall, DRSP/E2 group was superior in reducing clinical blood pressure (BP) and 24-h mean BP. There was no significant change in potassium levels on DRSP/E2 group versus control group, suggesting probability potassium sparing effect of this hormone therapy. The incidences of adverse events were low and similar. The current evidences indicate that DRSP 3 mg/E2 2 mg can significantly lower both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in postmenopausal hypertensive women.