Saudi practical guidelines on biologic treatment of psoriasis

Review on recommendations on the use of biologic therapy for the management of moderate-severe psoriasis in Saudi Arabia: an expert opinion

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with a significant global burden, impacting patients both physically and psychologically. While its exact etiology remains unclear, genetic predisposition and environmental triggers play key roles.

AREAS COVERED

Biologic therapies have revolutionized psoriasis management, offering targeted and effective disease control. However, despite their proven benefits, these treatments remain underutilized, limiting optimal outcomes and contributing to disparities in care. This expert consensus examines current challenges in biologics use and provides evidence-based recommendations for managing moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Saudi Arabia.

EXPERT OPINION

Optimizing biologic therapy use is crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing disease burden. By addressing gaps in clinical practice, this consensus aims to streamline management approaches and reduce treatment disparities in Saudi Arabia.

Prescribing patterns and persistence of biological therapies for psoriasis management: a retrospective cohort study from Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Biological therapies are effective for psoriasis, but patient responses vary, often requiring therapy switching or discontinuation.

OBJECTIVES

To identify physicians' prescribing patterns of biological therapies at a referral tertiary center in Saudi Arabia and assess the probability of biologic persistence following treatment initiation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of biologic-naïve adult psoriasis patients who initiated therapy from October 2013 to July 2022 in Dammam. Descriptive statistics and a Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated treatment persistence at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients received adalimumab (n = 89), etanercept (n = 17), risankizumab (n = 30), ustekinumab (n = 14), and ixekizumab (n = 1). At 6 months, all therapies demonstrated 100% persistence. At 12 months, persistence was highest for ustekinumab (100%) and lowest for etanercept (88.2%). At 24 months, ustekinumab maintained 100% persistence, followed by risankizumab (96.6%), adalimumab (94.3%), and etanercept (76.4%). At 36 months, risankizumab had the highest persistence (96.6%), followed by adalimumab (83.1%), ustekinumab (78%), and etanercept (70.6%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were lack of effectiveness and intolerability.

CONCLUSION

This study shows changing psoriasis treatment patterns with new therapies. Risankizumab demonstrated high long-term persistence, while etanercept and ustekinumab showed declining persistence, suggesting evolving treatment considerations.

National consensus on biologic dose reduction in psoriasis: a modified eDelphi procedure

BACKGROUND

Dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis is applied in daily practice, although guidelines are lacking. Striving for clear criteria is important, as it leads to a consistent application of dose reduction.

OBJECTIVE

To achieve consensus on criteria for biologic dose reduction in psoriasis patients with stable and low disease activity.

METHODS

An online Delphi procedure (eDelphi) was conducted. Dutch dermatologists were invited to participate in a maximum of 3 voting rounds. Proposed statements were selected based on literature review and included criteria for the application of dose reduction and dosing schedules. Biologic dose reduction was defined as 'application of injection interval prolongation'. Proposed statements were rated using a 9-point Likert scale; consensus was reached when ≥70% of all voters rated 'agree' (7-9) and <15% rated 'disagree' (1-3).

RESULTS

A total of 27 dermatologists participated and reached a consensus on 15 recommendations over 2 voting rounds. Agreed statements included criteria for dose reduction eligibility, criteria for dose reduction (dis)continuation, and dosing schedules for adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab. Based on the eDelphi outcomes, an algorithm fit for implementation in current practice was developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations of this national consensus process can guide clinicians, and consequently their patients, toward consistent application of biologic dose reduction.

Consensus statements for pharmacological management, monitoring of therapies, and comorbidity management of psoriatic arthritis in the United Arab Emirates

OBJECTIVE

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by heterogeneous clinical manifestations, substantially impacts the quality of life of affected individuals. This article aims at developing consensus recommendations for the management of PsA and associated comorbidities and screening and monitoring requirements of PsA therapies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) population.

METHODS

An extensive review of present international and regional guidelines and publications on the pharmacological management, monitoring of therapies in the context of PsA was performed. Key findings from guidelines and literature were reviewed by a panel of experts from the UAE at several meetings to align with current clinical practices. Consensus statements were formulated based on collective agreement of the experts and members of Emirates Society for Rheumatology.

RESULTS

The consensus recommendations were developed to aid practitioners in clinical decision-making with respect to dosage recommendations for pharmacological therapies for PsA, including conventional drugs, non-biologic, and biologic therapies. Consensus recommendations for therapeutic options for the treatment of PsA domains, including peripheral arthritis, axial disease, enthesitis, dactylitis, psoriasis, and nail disease, were developed. The panel emphasized the importance of monitoring PsA therapies and arrived at a consensus on monitoring requirements for PsA therapies. The expert panel proposed recommendations for the management of common comorbidities associated with PsA.

CONCLUSION

These consensus recommendations can guide physicians and healthcare professionals in the UAE in making proper treatment decisions, as well as efficiently managing comorbidities and monitoring therapies in patients with PsA.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the management of psoriasis: systematic review, critical appraisal, and quality assessment with the AGREE II instrument

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is considered one of the stubborn lifelong dermatologic diseases, making the patients seized in their social cage. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and expert opinions ensure that patients with psoriasis render the most recent and developed care. This systematic review assessed and compared the most recently approved international CPGs with the AGREE II instrument.

METHODS

After we identified our research question, we searched the bibliographic international databases to identify and screen for relevant and eligible guidelines that address the topic of interest. Four independent reviewers (Senior Expert Dermatologist in Psoriasis) have critically appraised the selected guidelines via the AGREE II instrument. We conducted inter-rater analysis and percent agreement among raters and calculation of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) 'Kappa'.

RESULTS

Out of 33 articles for CPGs, only Four eligible CPGs fulfill the inclusion criteria. Selected CPGs were critically appraised; first from the American College of Rheumatology that is also National Psoriasis Foundation (ACR/NPF-2018), second from the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE-2017) for Psoriasis: Assessment and Management, third from the Saudi practical guidelines on the biologic treatment for Psoriasis (Saudi CPGs, 2015), and lastly from the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD/NPF-2019) Management and Treatment of Psoriasis with Awareness and Attention to Comorbidities. The complete assessments (OA) of two CPGs (AAD/NPF and NICE) scored greater than 80%; 'six domains' of AGREE II had greater score that is congruent with results; (1) scope and motive, (2) shareholder involvement, (3) rigor of growth, (4) clarity of speech, (5) validity, and (6) journalistic independence domains. Domain (3) scored (84, 71, and 90%), domain (5) (51%, 47, and 90%), domain (6) (70, 52, and 90%) for (Saudi CPGs, AAD/NPF, and NICE), respectively. Generally, the clinical recommendations were significantly better for NICE CPGs.

CONCLUSIONS

Four evidence-based 'CPGs' introduced a high-quality methodological analysis. NICE indicated the greatest quality followed by Saudi CPGs and AAD/NPF and all four CPGs were suggested for practice.

Monitoring the effect of TNF-alpha inhibitors on laboratory parameters and adverse effects in different diseases: a retrospective, single-center study

BACKGROUND

The introduction of biological treatments has revolutionized the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Multiple clinical trials have established the efficacy of biological agents in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Nevertheless, there are no clear indications for optimal monitoring intervals during treatment.

OBJECTIVES

Collect and analyze laboratory evaluation data from patients receiving biological therapy to provide a better understanding of the need for laboratory investigations before and during treatment with biological agents, and to analyze adverse events and other factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort SETTINGS: Tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from the electronic medical records of patients attending the dermatology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology clinics from June 2014 to June 2019. The laboratory parameters of patients who have received one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab) were collected starting at baseline and up to at least one year from treatment initiation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The time points at which patients developed significantly abnormal laboratory results during treatment with one of the TNF-alpha inhibitors.

SAMPLE SIZE

250 patients RESULTS: Most patients were treated with adalimumab (38.4%); a similar proportion (38%) with infliximab, whereas only 23.6% were treated with etanercept. The majority of the significant abnormal laboratory results occurred at baseline, 3-6 and 9-12 months. Most abnormalities were among patients using infliximab, followed by etanercept, and then adalimumab. The median number of laboratory abnormalities for dermatology patients was significantly lower than that for gastroenterology patients (P<.001), and for rheumatology patients (P=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Because dermatology patients showed a lower median number of laboratory abnormalities than patients treated by other specialties in our study, we believe that dermatology patients require less frequent laboratory monitoring. Therefore, we recommend laboratory evaluation at baseline, after 3-6 months, 1 year from the beginning of treatment, and annually thereafter for patients using TNF-alpha inhibitor agents. However, more frequent testing might be warranted according to patient comorbidities, concomitant medications, and physician judgment.

LIMITATIONS

Single center and retrospective design.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

Consensus statements for evaluation and nonpharmacological Management of Psoriatic Arthritis in UAE

OBJECTIVE

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a chronic inflammatory arthropathy, is often underdiagnosed in Middle Eastern countries, substantially impacting the treatment of affected individuals. This article aims to highlight current unmet clinical needs and provide consensus recommendations for region-specific evaluation methods and nonpharmacological therapies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

METHOD

An extensive literature review was conducted, focusing especially on global and regional guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of PsA. These form the basis of the consensus statements formulated. Additionally, an expert panel of key opinion leaders from the UAE reviewed these guidelines and available literature at an advisory board meeting to identify unmet needs, bridge clinical gaps in the UAE, and develop consensus statements for the evaluation and treatment of PsA.

RESULT

The consensus statements were developed based on overarching principles for the management of PsA, evaluation of patients with PsA, and nonpharmacological approaches for the management of PsA. The overarching principles included adopting a targeted, multidisciplinary approach, along with collaboration between rheumatologists and dermatologists in cases of clinically significant skin involvement. The panel also highlighted the value of composite disease severity measures for characterizing clinical manifestations of PsA. In terms of nonpharmacological management approaches, lifestyle modification (comprising dietary change, exercise, and cessation of smoking) and psychotherapy were recommended.

CONCLUSION

The consensus statements will aid healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making in the context of PsA.

Systemic Management of Psoriasis Patients in Indian Scenario: An Expert Consensus

Background:

Psoriasis is a common inflammatory disease with significant comorbidities, and regardless of its extent, it affects the patients' quality of life. The various modalities of treating psoriasis comprise topical or systemic medications, phototherapy, and an array of biologic agents. There is a lack of Indian recommendations on the management of psoriasis with these different modalities and challenges faced by the clinicians in day-to-day practice.

Aim:

To develop India-specific consensus for systemic management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Method and Results:

A panel of dermatology experts, based on the evidence and international recommendations, coupled with their own clinical experience, developed recommendations for systemic management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Conclusion:

These recommendations are meant to provide guidance in terms of choice of systemic therapies, dosing, effectiveness, and safety. It also addresses clinical challenges that may be experienced during psoriasis management.

Dose reduction of the new generation biologics (IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors) in psoriasis: study protocol for an international, pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study-the BeNeBio study

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease for which biologics are effective treatments. Dose reduction (DR) of the first generation biologics seems a promising way for more efficient use of expensive biologics. A substantial part of patients on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alfa inhibitors and ustekinumab could successfully lower their dose, after following a tightly controlled DR strategy. The objective of this study is to assess whether controlled DR of interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors in psoriasis patients with low disease activity is non-inferior (NI) to usual care (UC).

METHODS

This is an international, prospective, multicenter, pragmatic, randomized, non-inferiority trial. A total of 244 patients with stable low disease activity (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 5) for at least 6 months and using secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, guselkumab, risankizumab, or tildrakizumab in the standard dose, together with stable low disease activity, defined as a PASI ≤ 5 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤ 5 at the moment of inclusion, will be randomized 2:1 to DR or UC. In the DR group, dosing intervals will be prolonged stepwise to achieve 66% and 50% of the original dose. Disease activity is monitored every 3 months by PASI and DLQI. In case of disease flare (i.e., PASI and/or DLQI increase), treatment is adjusted to the previous effective dose. The primary outcome is the incidence proportion of persistent flares (PASI > 5 for ≥ 3 months), which will be compared between arms. Secondary outcomes include proportion of patients with successful DR, (course of) PASI and DLQI, serious adverse events (SAEs), health-related quality of life, costs, and pharmacokinetic profile. Outcomes of DR will be compared to UC.

DISCUSSION

With this study, we aim to assess whether DR of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibiting biologics can be achieved for psoriasis patients with low disease activity, without losing disease control. Reducing the dose may lead to more efficient use of biologics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04340076 . Registered on April 9 2020.

Attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologics for psoriasis: a survey among dermatologists worldwide

Dose reduction (DR) of biologics, where possible, seems promising for more efficient use of expensive biologics. For implementation of DR strategies, it is essential to get insight in factors that influence implementation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the attitudes and behaviour regarding dose reduction of biologic therapies for psoriasis among psoriasis expert dermatologists worldwide. A 27-question e-survey was sent through the International Psoriasis Council (IPC) to its 114 dermatologist councilors worldwide. The survey assessed demographics, general and DR prescription behaviour, and motivations for and barriers against application of DR. Of 57 respondents, 53 respondents who prescribed biologics were included for analysis. Thirty-seven (69.8%) applied DR (i.e., ‘DR dermatologists’), and 16 (30.2%) did not (i.e., ‘Non-DR dermatologists’). DR strategies varied among respondents. Regarding criteria for starting DR, differences were reported in required treatment duration, and interpretation and duration of stable low disease activity. In addition, the prolongation of intervals between injections varied between respondents. For most ‘DR dermatologists’ (n = 32/37, 86.5%), cost savings were one of the main reasons to apply DR. Fifteen out of 16 ‘Non-DR dermatologists’ (94%) did not apply DR due to lack of scientific evidence. In conclusion, DR of biologics for psoriasis is part of clinical practice in psoriasis experts globally. Barriers for applying DR included lack of evidence or guidelines, and uncertainty on DR effects and risks. Although growing evidence shows DR feasibility, future studies are needed to accumulate and broaden evidence, along with development of (inter)national guidelines on DR strategies.

Saudi consensus statement on biologic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis (2020)

Psoriasis is a common chronic and complex inflammatory skin disease that affects over 125 million people worldwide. Management of psoriasis in daily clinical practice in Saudi Arabia is variable. Local preferences for management differ, which may have a bearing on the treatment selection. Biologic therapy is now a well-established strategy for managing moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. There is a clear need for national consensus statements due to the extended role and high availability of literature on these agents. As a result of an initiative of the Ministry of Health, a multidisciplinary expert panel of dermatologists and pharmacists with practical experience in the clinical management of psoriasis were invited to be part of a work group to update the previous practical guidelines on the biologic treatment of psoriasis published in the Journal of Dermatological Treatment, 2014. The overall aim of this consensus document is to deliver evidence-based recommendations on the use, screening, and monitoring of biologic therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. These recommendations also address the use of biologic therapy in special patient populations. They were developed after rigorous evaluation of existing international guidelines as well as the latest emerging evidence. Updates of the present consensus document will be provided as needed to incorporate new data or agents.

The Unmet Need for Clinical Guidelines on the Management of Patients with Plaque Psoriasis in Africa and the Middle East

Purpose

Dermatologists practicing in African and Middle Eastern countries face numerous challenges when managing patients with plaque psoriasis, especially those with disease in a difficult-to-treat anatomic area or those who are a pediatric, geriatric, or pregnant patient. The publication of comprehensive, up-to-date, region-specific clinical guidelines may help to address some of these challenges and improve outcomes. We conducted a literature review to identify recent guidelines and other publications describing patients with plaque psoriasis in Africa and the Middle East.

Patients and Methods

An online literature search of the PubMed database was conducted to identify publications reporting clinical guidelines and research studies on plaque psoriasis. The search included all articles published from January 2008 to March 2020 inclusive. The titles and abstracts of all search results were screened by a reader to identify those that described patients in Africa or the Middle East.

Results

A total of 145 publications were identified by the literature search and screened by a reader. There were 10 publications that described patients in Africa or the Middle East: 4 research articles, 3 reviews, 2 guidelines, and 1 case study. The 2010 guidelines from South Africa made recommendations for treating plaque psoriasis of varying severity, although without specific recommendations for difficult-to-treat anatomic areas or pediatric, geriatric, or pregnant patients. The 2014 guideline on biologics from Saudi Arabia included recommendations for the use of these agents in patients with plaque psoriasis, including difficult-to-treat anatomic areas and pediatric patients (TNF inhibitors only), but provided no recommendations for pregnant or geriatric patients.

Conclusion

There is an urgent unmet need for comprehensive clinical guidelines on the management of patients with plaque psoriasis in Africa and the Middle East. Region-specific studies on the epidemiology, burden of disease, and the safety and effectiveness of newer pharmacotherapies are needed to support the development of such guidelines.

Considerable variation among Iranian dermatologists in the knowledge and attitudes regarding the use of biologic agents to manage psoriasis. Int J Womens Dermatol 2020;5:356-360. [PMID: 31909157 PMCID: PMC6938863 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2019.09.010]

Background

Many international guidelines have been introduced with the aim of helping clinicians by providing evidence-based advice for the prescription of biologic therapies in psoriasis. Because no local or regional guideline is available, the treatment of psoriasis with biologics is mainly based on clinical experiences regarding the international guideline among Iranian dermatologists.

Objective

To assess the knowledge and attitudes among Iranian specialists regarding the use of biologic agents to manage psoriasis.

Methods

Data were collected using an electronic questionnaire specifically designed for this study based on a review of the literature. The designed Google form consisted of 53 multiple choice questions divided into five sections.

Results

A total of 111 dermatologists agreed to participate in this study. There was considerable variation among the responding dermatologists in terms of their knowledge and attitudes toward biologics. There were some significant associations between knowledge and attitudes of dermatologists toward biologics and their personal and professional characteristics.

Conclusions

More comprehensive educational approaches, both in the dermatology residency and postgraduation periods, could be very beneficial to promote the knowledge and attitude of the dermatologist in treating psoriasis with biologic agents. This study could be one of the first steps to develop a country-based or a region-based plan to improve the knowledge and attitude among dermatologists regarding the use of biologic drugs in psoriasis and possibly to reach a better status to prescribe these agents in the management of psoriasis.

Experience and challenges for biologic use in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Africa and the Middle East region

The incidence of psoriasis in Africa and the Middle East (AfME) is high as in other regions and represents a significant problem for both dermatologists and patients. Psoriasis co-morbidities such as obesity, cardiovascular disease and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are also particularly common in these regions and may be under-recognized and under-treated. Despite this, regional guidelines to aid physicians on the appropriate use of biologic agents in their clinical practice are limited. A group of expert dermatologists from across the AfME region were surveyed to help establish best practice across the region, alongside supporting data from the literature. Although biologics have significantly improved patient outcomes since their introduction, the results of this survey identified several unmet needs, including the lack of consensus regarding their use in clinical practice. Discrepancy also exists among AfME physicians concerning the clinical relevance of immunogenicity to biologics, despite increasing data across inflammatory diseases. Significant treatment and management of challenges for psoriasis patients remain, and a move towards individualized, tailored care may help to address these issues. The development of specific local guidelines for the treatment of both psoriasis and PsA could also be a step towards understanding the distinct patient profiles in these regions.