In vitro activity of terbinafine (Lamisilr`): An update

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy and safety of two doses of terbinafine (500 and 1000 mg day-1) in the treatment of cutaneous or lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis. Vergleichende Bewertung der Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit zweier Terbinafin-Dosierungen (500 und 1000 mg/Tag) in der Therapie der kutanen und lymphokutanen Sporotrichose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral terbinafine (500 and 1000 mg day(-1)) in the treatment of cutaneous or lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis. A culture for Sporothrix schenckii was required for inclusion into this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients received either 250 mg b.i.d. or 500 mg b.i.d. oral terbinafine for up to a maximum of 24 weeks and were assessed up to 24 weeks post-treatment. The main efficacy outcome measure was cure, defined as no lesion and absence of adenopathy at the end of follow-up. Adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests, vital signs and ophthalmological examinations were also assessed. Sixty-three patients (14-85 years of age) were treated with 500 mg day(-1) (n = 28) or 1000 mg day(-1) terbinafine (n = 35). The majority of patients were cured after 12-24 weeks of treatment, and the response was dose-dependent throughout the study and at the end of follow-up. The cure rate was significantly higher in patients treated with 1000 mg day(-1) terbinafine compared with those treated with 500 mg day(-1) terbinafine (87% vs. 52%, respectively; P = 0.004). There were no cases of relapse after 24 weeks of follow-up in the 1000 mg day(-1) terbinafine group, compared with six relapses in the terbinafine 500 mg day(-1) group. Terbinafine was well tolerated and the frequency of drug-related AEs was slightly higher in the 1000 mg treatment group. Both doses of terbinafine were well-tolerated and effective for the treatment of sporotrichosis. The 1000 mg day(-1) terbinafine dose was more efficacious than 500 mg day(-1) in the treatment of cutaneous or lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis.

Terbinafine: a review of its use in onychomycosis in adults

Terbinafine, an orally and topically active antimycotic agent, inhibits the biosynthesis of the principal sterol in fungi, ergosterol, at the level of squalene epoxidase. Squalene epoxidase inhibition results in ergosterol-depleted fungal cell membranes (fungistatic effect) and the toxic accumulation of intracellular squalene (fungicidal effect). Terbinafine has demonstrated excellent fungicidal activity against the dermatophytes and variable activity against yeasts and non-dermatophyte molds in vitro. Following oral administration, terbinafine is rapidly absorbed and widely distributed to body tissues including the poorly perfused nail matrix. Nail terbinafine concentrations are detected within 1 week after starting therapy and persist for at least 30 weeks after the completion of treatment. Randomized, double-blind trials showed oral terbinafine 250 mg/day for 12 or 16 weeks was more efficacious than itraconazole, fluconazole and griseofulvin in dermatophyte onychomycosis of the toenails. In particular, at 72 weeks' follow-up, the multicenter, multinational, L.I.ON. (Lamisil vs Itraconazole in ONychomycosis) study found that mycologic cure rates (76 vs 38% of patients after 12 weeks' treatment; 81 vs 49% of recipients after 16 weeks' therapy) and complete cure rates were approximately twice as high after terbinafine treatment than after itraconazole (3 or 4 cycles of 400 mg/day for 1 week repeated every 4 weeks) in patients with toenail mycosis. Furthermore, the L.I.ON. Icelandic Extension study demonstrated that terbinafine was more clinically effective than intermittent itraconazole to a statistically significant extent at 5-year follow-up. Terbinafine produced a superior complete cure rate (35 vs 14%), mycologic cure rate (46 vs 13%) and clinical cure rate (42 vs 18%) to that of itraconazole. The mycologic and clinical relapse rates were 23% and 21% in the terbinafine group, respectively, compared with 53% and 48% in the itraconazole group. In comparative clinical trials, oral terbinafine had a better tolerability profile than griseofulvin and a comparable profile to that of itraconazole or fluconazole. Post marketing surveillance confirmed terbinafine's good tolerability profile. Adverse events were experienced by 10.5% of terbinafine recipients, with gastrointestinal complaints being the most common. Unlike the azoles, terbinafine has a low potential for drug-drug interactions. Most pharmacoeconomic evaluations have shown that the greater clinical effectiveness of oral terbinafine in dermatophyte onychomycosis translates into a cost-effectiveness ratio superior to that of itraconazole, fluconazole and griseofulvin.

CONCLUSION

Oral terbinafine has demonstrated greater effectiveness than itraconazole, fluconazole and griseofulvin in randomized trials involving patients with onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes. The drug is generally well tolerated and has a low potential for drug interactions. Therefore, terbinafine is the treatment of choice for dermatophyte onychomycosis.

Guidelines for treatment of onychomycosis

These guidelines for management of onychomycosis have been prepared for dermatologists on behalf of the British Association of Dermatologists. They present evidence-based guidance for treatment, with identification of the strength of evidence available at the time of preparation of the guidelines, and a brief overview of epidemiological aspects, diagnosis and investigation.

In vitro susceptibility of Microsporum canis and other dermatophyte isolates from veterinary infections during therapy with terbinafine or griseofulvin

We investigated the in vitro activity of terbinafine against fresh veterinary isolates of Microsporum canis and the potential of this organism to develop resistance in vivo during oral therapy. Dermatophyte cultures (n = 300) were obtained from naturally infected cats and dogs undergoing oral therapy with terbinafine or griseofulvin. M. canis comprised 92% of isolates; other species included Microsporum gypseum and Trichophyton mentagrophytes. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of terbinafine and griseofulvin were determined by broth macrodilution assay. Terbinafine was highly active against all three species with MIC90< or =0.03 microg ml(-1), in agreement with published data. However, terbinafine exhibited primary cidal activity against 66% of Microsporum isolates (n = 275) in contrast to the almost complete cidal effect in Trichophyton (n = 18). Griseofulvin was significantly less active than terbinafine (MIC90 = 4 microg ml(-1)) but had a primary cidal action on about 40% of the isolates. The data were analysed for changes in MIC and MFC during the course of therapy, which could be indicative for development of acquired resistance. Oral treatment of 37 animals with terbinafine for up to 39 weeks caused no increase in MIC or MFC of terbinafine, either in individual patients or in the whole group.

Therapeutic potential of terbinafine in subcutaneous and systemic mycoses

Mycoses vary widely in severity, and may present as superficial, subcutaneous and/or systemic infection. Effective treatments for most superficial mycoses now exist, but new agents with convenient dosing regimens and a low level of adverse events are still needed to reduce morbidity and mortality from serious subcutaneous and systemic fungal infections. In vitro, terbinafine exhibits a broad spectrum of activity against the pathogenic fungi responsible for deep mycoses. Clinical data, while not abundant, suggest that this in vitro activity of terbinafine is reflected in its in vivo efficacy. The limited data show that terbinafine is a useful first-line treatment in chromoblastomycosis patients and has efficacy in pulmonary aspergillosis. There are also data to suggest that terbinafine may be effective in treating histoplasmosis, Pneumocystis carinii infection, fungal mycetoma, and cutaneous leishmaniasis. Moreover, there is some evidence of terbinafine having synergistic activity with amphotericin B, itraconazole, and fluconazole against clinical isolates of Candida species. Thus, the therapeutic potential of terbinafine extends well beyond its current use in acute and chronic dermatophytoses to include a wide range of subcutaneous and systemic mycoses. Studies are needed to determine the optimum dose in each disease, and whether combination therapy would have advantages in certain circumstances.