Audit of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in a hospital with highly prevalent fluoroquinolone resistance

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia at high risk of serious infections: Exploring pros and cons

BACKGROUND

The use of fluoroquinolones to prevent infections in neutropenic patients with cancer or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a controversial issue, with international guidelines providing conflicting recommendations. Although potential benefits are clear, concerns revolve around efficacy, potential harms, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) implications.

DISCUSSION

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduces neutropenic fever (NF) bloodstream infections and other serious bacterial infections, based on evidence from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in adults and children. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis may also reduce infection-related morbidity and healthcare costs; however, evidence is conflicting. Adverse effects of fluoroquinolones are well recognized in the general population; however, studies in the cancer cohort where it is used for a defined period of neutropenia have not reflected this. The largest concern for routine use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis remains AMR, as many, but not all, observational studies have found that fluoroquinolone prophylaxis might increase the risk of AMR, and some studies have suggested negative impacts on patient outcomes as a result.

CONCLUSIONS

The debate surrounding fluoroquinolone prophylaxis calls for individualized risk assessment based on patient characteristics and local AMR patterns, and prophylaxis should be restricted to patients at the highest risk of serious infection during the highest risk periods to ensure that the risk-benefit analysis is in favor of individual and community benefit. More research is needed to address important unanswered questions about fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with cancer or receiving HSCT.

Impact of Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis on Neutropenic Fever, Infections, and Antimicrobial Resistance in Newly Diagnosed AML Patients

INTRODUCTION

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is recommended during induction chemotherapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to reduce risk of neutropenic fever and systemic bacterial infections. We evaluated the effectiveness of primary fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in an area with high fluoroquinolone resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of newly diagnosed adult AML patients who received frontline therapy at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, NY, between 2012 and 2019. Primary outcome was development of neutropenic fever. Secondary outcomes were development of systemic bacterial infections and infections with multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridioides difficile. Infectious outcomes were collected through 6 months after therapy initiation. We estimated the effect of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis with a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of 121 included patients, 87 received antibiotic prophylaxis and 34 did not. There was no difference in baseline characteristics, although the prophylaxis group had longer neutropenia duration (median 30 vs. 23 days, P = .013). The prophylaxis group had a reduced risk of neutropenic fever (hazard ratio 0.59, P = .039). The prophylaxis group had fewer gram-positive (P = .043) and gram-negative (P = .049) bloodstream infections and fewer clinically documented infections during frontline therapy (P = .005) and follow-up (P = .026). There was no difference in incidence of C. difficile or infection with fluoroquinolone-resistant or multidrug-resistant organisms. There was no mortality difference between groups.

CONCLUSION

In an area with high fluoroquinolone resistance, primary fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in newly diagnosed AML patients reduced the risk of neutropenic fever and systemic bacterial infections without increased antimicrobial resistance. Prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Variation in Clinical Practice and Attitudes on Antibacterial Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy: A Survey of Cancer Centers Across the United States

Background

Contemporary information regarding fever and neutropenia (FN) management, including approaches to antibacterial prophylaxis, empiric therapy, and de-escalation across US cancer centers, is lacking.

Methods

This was a self-administered, electronic, cross-sectional survey of antimicrobial stewardship physicians and pharmacists at US cancer centers. The survey ascertained institutional practices and individual attitudes on FN management in high-risk cancer patients. A 5-point Likert scale assessed individual attitudes.

Results

Providers from 31 of 86 hospitals (36%) responded, and FN management guidelines existed in most (29/31, 94%) hospitals. Antibacterial prophylaxis was recommended in 27/31 (87%) hospitals, with levofloxacin as the preferred agent (23/27, 85%). Cefepime was the most recommended agent for empiric FN treatment (26/29, 90%). Most institutional guidelines (26/29, 90%) recommended against routine addition of empiric gram-positive agents except for specific scenarios. Eighteen of 29 (62%) hospitals explicitly provided guidance on de-escalation of empiric, systemic antibacterial therapy; however, timing of de-escalation was variable according to clinical scenario. Among 34 individual respondents, a majority agreed with use of antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk patients (25, 74%). Interestingly, only 10 (29%) respondents indicated agreement with the statement that benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis outweigh potential harms.

Conclusion

Most US cancer centers surveyed had institutional FN management guidelines. Antibiotic de-escalation guidance was lacking in nearly 40% of centers, with heterogeneity in approaches when recommendations existed. Further research is needed to inform FN guidelines on antibacterial prophylaxis and therapy de-escalation.

Antibiotic prophylaxis and the gastrointestinal resistome in paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a cohort study with metagenomic sequencing analysis

Background

Although antibiotic prophylaxis with levofloxacin can reduce the risk of serious infection in immunocompromised patients, the potential contribution of prophylaxis to antibiotic resistance is a major drawback. We aimed to identify the effects of levofloxacin prophylaxis, given to paediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia to prevent infections during induction chemotherapy, on antibiotic resistance in gastrointestinal microbiota after completion of induction and consolidation therapy.

Methods

This prospective, single-centre (St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA) cohort study included children (≤18 years) receiving therapy for newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and who received either primary levofloxacin prophylaxis or no antibacterial prophylaxis (aside from Pneumocystis jirovecii prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and provided at least two stool samples, including one after completion of induction therapy. We used metagenomic sequencing to identify bacterial genes that confer resistance to fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, or other antibiotics, and to identify point mutations in bacterial topoisomerases (gyrA, parC) that confer resistance to fluoroquinolones. We then used generalised linear mixed models to compare the prevalence and relative abundance of antibiotic resistance gene groups after completion of induction and consolidation therapy between participants who had received levofloxacin and those who received no prophylaxis.

Findings

Between Feb 1, 2012, and April 30, 2016, 118 stool samples (32 baseline, 49 after induction, and 37 after consolidation) were collected from 49 evaluable participants; of these participants, 31 (63%) received levofloxacin prophylaxis during induction therapy and 18 (37%) received no antibacterial prophylaxis. Over the course of induction therapy, there was an overall increase in the relative abundance of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance genes (estimated mean fold change 5·9, 95% CI 3·6-9·6; p<0·0001), which was not modified by levofloxacin prophylaxis (p=0·46). By contrast, the prevalence of topoisomerase point mutations increased over the course of induction therapy in levofloxacin recipients (mean prevalence 10·4% [95% CI 3·2-25·4] after induction therapy vs 3·7% [0·2-22·5] at baseline) but not other participants (0% vs 0%; p<0·0001). There was no significant difference between prophylaxis groups with respect to changes in aminoglycoside, β-lactam, vancomycin, or multidrug resistance genes after completion of induction or consolidation therapy.

Interpretation

Analysing the gastrointestinal resistome can provide insights into the effects of antibiotics on the risk of antibiotic-resistant infections. In this study, antibiotic prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole or levofloxacin during induction therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia appeared to increase the short-term and medium-term risk of colonisation with bacteria resistant to these antibiotics, but not to other drugs. More research is needed to determine the longer-term effects of antibacterial prophylaxis on colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Funding

Children's Infection Defense Center at St Jude Children's Research Hospital, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities, and National Institutes of Health.

Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma in patients with a high rate of fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative bacteria colonization

BACKGROUND

Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis used to be a standard precaution during autologous stem cell transplantation. Its benefit, with a high prevalence of fluoroqinolone resistance in the population, has recently been under scrutiny.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of cessation of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis during stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 104 patients with multiple myeloma transplanted during the period from January 2013 to April 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. 67 received standard ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (group A) and 37 received no antibacterial prophylaxis (group B).

RESULTS

Febrile episodes during neutropenia, bloodstream infection (BSI) and mortality in these two cohorts were evaluated. Gram negative BSI was assessed for the colonization of quinolone-resistant gram-negative pathogens. Secondary Clostridium difficile enterocolitis presence was determined in both cohorts. There were 42 (63%), 7 (10%), and 0 febrile episodes, BSI and gram-negative BSI respectively in group A, and 34 (92%), 12 (32%), and 4 (11%) respectively in group B. The differences in the number of febrile episodes (P=0.0011) and deaths (P=0.0427) were statistically significance. Mortality was 0 and 3 (8%) in group A and group B, respectively. There was no significant difference in colonization with quinolone-resistant gram negative pathogens (25 (37%) versus 11 (30%)) between groups. The occurrence of Clostridium difficile colitis was the same in both groups.

CONCLUSION

We resumed ciprofloxacin prophylaxis for the following reasons. There was a significant reduction in febrile episodes, and consequently a sparing effect of antibiotics used for treatment of this condition. No difference in Clostridium difficile colitis occurred and the mortality rate of 8% in group B was unacceptably high.

A comparison of levofloxacin and oral third-generation cephalosporins as antibacterial prophylaxis in acute leukaemia patients during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia

Background

There is demonstrated benefit with fluoroquinolones as infection prophylaxis in neutropenic patients; however, side effects, drug interactions and increasing resistance necessitate investigation of alternative therapies.

Objectives

To compare the incidence of febrile neutropenia in high-risk patients with haematological malignancy receiving a fluoroquinolone with those receiving an oral third-generation cephalosporin (OTGC) as antibacterial prophylaxis during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Methods

A retrospective, matched, single-centre study comparing clinical and microbiological outcomes in acute leukaemia patients receiving fluoroquinolones versus OTGCs as antibacterial prophylaxis after chemotherapy.

Results

A total of 120 patients (levofloxacin n = 80, OTGC n = 40) were included and matched. The 30 day incidence of febrile neutropenia was 89.7% (95% CI = 82.4-93.9). The rates of febrile neutropenia were similar between antimicrobials (OTGC versus levofloxacin HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.54-1.52, P = 0.70). The most frequent site of infection was the bloodstream (line related) (n = 24, 62%) and the majority (n = 28, 72%) of infections were caused by Gram-positive organisms. Groups were similar in terms of site of infection (P = 0.91) and morphology of recovered microorganisms (P = 0.74). There were significantly more cultures positive for Enterobacter spp. in the OTGC group (P = 0.043). Three patients died during follow-up (from first dose up to 30 days after the last dose) (30 day survival = 99.2%, 95% CI = 97.5-100), with only two of the reported deaths attributable to infection.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate comparable rates of febrile neutropenia and culture positivity with an increase in cultures positive for Enterobacter spp. when OTGCs are compared with levofloxacin for antibacterial prophylaxis during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Further prospective, randomized investigation is warranted.

Incomplete recovery of the fecal flora of hematological patients with neutropenia and repeated fluoroquinolone prophylaxis

Background

Routine fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies is still controversial, because of antibiotic resistance concerns. The recovery of the fecal microbiota to the initial composition in patients receiving multiple courses of quinolone prophylaxis and repeated chemotherapy has not been evaluated.

Methods

We prospectively examined the changes in the fecal bacterial composition before and after levofloxacin prophylaxis. A sequential observation of bacterial resistance in patients receiving multiple prophylactic courses was also conducted.

Results

In this trial, 68 cases, including (35 with the first course and 33 with the second and subsequent courses) were registered. The disappearance of quinolone-susceptible (QS) Entero-bacteriaceae and dominant emergence of quinolone-resistant (QR) coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) and QR Enterococci were observed after the first prophylaxis. The detection of QS Enterobacteriaceae was recovered before the second and subsequent courses to a level of the initial composition (28/35 samples, 80.0% before the first course vs 23/33 samples, 69.7% before the second and subsequent courses, P=0.41). In contrast, the detection rate of QR CNS and Enterococci significantly increased at the second and subsequent courses, even before prophylaxis (8/35 samples, 22.9% before the first course vs 20/33 samples, 60.6% before the second and subsequent courses, P=0.003). The incomplete recovery of the initial bacterial composition was associated with a prophylactic interval of within 30 days. Of the patients receiving multiple prophylactic courses, six had QR Escherichia coli, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, at the first course, and four (66.3%) of the six patients had persistent detection of QR E. coli at the second course.

Conclusion

In patients receiving multiple courses of prophylactic quinolone, along with a common chemotherapy schedule, newly emergent resistant bacteria could be frequently persistent in their fecal flora.

Prophylactic levofloxacin in pediatric neutropenic patients during autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Using fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in pediatric neutropenic patients is a controversial issue due to the concern about emergence of resistant strains in addition to the lack of pediatric studies. This study was performed to assess the effectiveness of levofloxacin prophylaxis in pediatric patients during autologous stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

This was an observational study of pediatric patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation, comparing patients who received levofloxacin prophylaxis to historical controls.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included (46 patients in the control group and 50 patients received levofloxacin). The median duration till onset of first fever was 11 d in the control group as compared to 15 d in patients who received levofloxacin (p ≤ 0.001). The incidence of infectious complications was higher in patients without levofloxacin (4/46) than those with levofloxacin (1/50). The median duration of empirical antibiotic use was 10 d in the levofloxacin group compared with 14 d in the control group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Levofloxacin prophylaxis delayed first spike of fever, decreased the incidence of septic complications, and shortened the duration of empiric antibiotic use, but its impact on emergence of resistant organisms should be closely monitored.

Role of antimicrobial prophylaxis during treatment of adults with acute leukemia

Patients with acute leukemia (AL) are at high risk for developing bacterial, viral and fungal infections during chemotherapy. Because these infections cause considerable morbidity and mortality, prevention is attractive. In recent decades, several trials have established the benefit of prophylactic antimicrobials in patients with AL. Administration of prophylactic fluoroquinolone, acyclovir and triazole is recommended in neutropenic patients with AL by both the USA and European national guidelines. The potential for antimicrobial resistance as a long-term consequence of prophylaxis, however, is a concern. The recent development of nonculture-based diagnostic tests for invasive fungal infections has made early diagnosis and targeted treatment a promising future strategy as an alternative to mold-active prophylaxis.

Clinical and microbiologic outcomes of quinolone prophylaxis in children with acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

Intensifying treatment for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has improved survival, with infections now being a leading cause of morbidity. Because quinolone prophylaxis is effective in adults with AML and in transplant populations, ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (CPx) was introduced as the standard for pediatric AML. We report here the impact of CPx in this population.

METHODS

Prevalence of fever and neutropenia, frequency and pathogen spectrum of infections, antibiotic use, supportive care and mortality before and after implementation of CPx were retrospectively compared in children with AML.

RESULTS

The cohort included 35 patients with de novo and 10 with relapsed AML, who together underwent 153 chemotherapy courses. Fever and neutropenia resulting in the use of empiric antibiotics occurred in 90% of chemotherapy courses (137/153); this was associated with proven bacteremia in 26%. The use of CPx did not change the incidence of febrile or infectious episodes, number of days of fever or antibiotic treatment or mortality. CPx was associated with a significant decrease in infections caused by Gram-negative rods (13.4% vs 4.7%) but a concomitant significant increase in bacteremia caused by viridans streptococci (12% vs 28%), resulting in no significant overall difference in the incidence of bacteremia between the 2 groups (35.9% vs 31.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

CPx neither alter the incidence of overall bacteremia nor change the pattern of fever or use of supportive care. Our experience supports further investigation into the use of extended-spectrum quinolone prophylaxis during therapy for pediatric AML.

Infection control issues in patients with haematological malignancies in the era of multidrug-resistant bacteria

Drug-resistant Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria are now increasingly identified as a cause of infections in immunocompromised hosts. Bacteria identified include the multidrug-resistant (MDR) and even pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae spp. The threat from MDR pathogens has been well-documented in the past decade with warnings about the consequences of inappropriate use of antimicrobial drugs. Resistant bacteria can substantially complicate the treatment of infections in critically ill patients and can have a substantial effect on mortality. Inappropriate antimicrobial treatment can affect morbidity, mortality, and overall health-care costs. Evidence-based data for prevention and control of MDR pathogen infections in haematology are scarce. Although not yet established a bundle of infection control and prevention measures with an anti-infective stewardship programme is an important strategy in infection control, diagnosis, and antibiotic selection with optimum regimens to ensure a successful outcome for patients.

Impact of peri-transplant vancomycin and fluoroquinolone administration on rates of bacteremia in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients: a 12-year single institution study

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the effect of peri-transplant prophylaxis on the epidemiology of bacteremia in a 12-year contemporary cohort of allogeneic HSCT recipients at our center.

METHODS

This was an observational study of 1052 consecutive adult HSCT from 2000 to 2011. Formal prophylaxis with vancomycin only, fluoroquinolone (FQ) only, or vancomycin + FQ was implemented in 2006. The cumulative incidence of day 100 bacteremia was compared between the Early Period (2000-2005) and the Recent Period (2006-2011). Predictors for pre-engraftment bacteremia were analyzed with Cox-proportional hazard models in a subcohort of 821 HSCT who received myeloablative or reduced intensity conditioning (MA/RIC).

RESULTS

The incidence of bacteremia decreased in the Recent Period (32% vs 27%; P = 0.002), whereas the rates of resistance in gram-negative rods (GNR) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were similar between the two Periods (P values are not statistically significant.) In multivariate analyses, prophylaxis with vancomycin only or vancomycin + FQ was protective (HR = 0.5; CI = 0.30-0.72) and (HR = 0.3; CI = 0.12-0.52, P < 0.01). Vancomycin or vancomycin + FQ eliminated viridans streptococcal bacteremia (VSB); vancomycin + FQ decreased GNR bacteremia (HR = 0.35; CI = 0.15-0.85).

CONCLUSIONS

Vancomycin-based prophylaxis peri-transplant in MA/RIC HSCT was associated with elimination of VSB and may be considered at centers with high incidence of this infection.

Prophylaxis with levofloxacin: impact on bacterial susceptibility and epidemiology in a hematopoietic stem cell transplant unit

Background

The emergence of resistance has been demonstrated in cancer treatment centers where prophylaxis with fluoroquinolone is used.

Objective

Considering the importance of epidemiological monitoring as a strategy in choosing protocols involving antibiotics, this study aimed to evaluate the emergence of quinolone resistance and changes in the local epidemiology in a hematopoietic stem cell transplant service.

Methods

For this study, 60 positive cultures before the prophylactic use of levofloxacin (period A: 2007-2008) and 118 cultures after starting the use of prophylactic levofloxacin (period B: 2010-2011) were evaluated.

Results

Resistance increased for all the different types of bacteria isolated (from 46.0% to 76.5%; p-value = 0.0002). Among Gram-negative bacteria, resistance increased from 21.4% to 60.7% (p-value = 0.0163) and among Gram-positive bacteria, it increased from 55.6% to 82.9% (p-value = 0.0025). The use of levofloxacin increased from 19.44 defined daily doses per 1,000 patient-days in period A to 166.64 in period B. The use of broad spectrum antibiotics remained unchanged. Considering bacteria associated with infection, 72 and 76 were isolated in periods A and B, respectively. There was a reduction in the rate of Gram-negative bacteria in cultures associated with infection (3.81 vs. 2.00 cultures/1,000 patient-days; p-value = 0.008).

Conclusion

The study of prophylaxis with levofloxacin demonstrated that there was a decrease in infections by Gram-negative bacteria; however, bacterial resistance increased, even though the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics remained unchanged. Constant monitoring of local epidemiology combined with research on clinical outcomes is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylaxis.

© 2014 Associação Brasileira de Hematologia, Hemoterapia e Terapia Celular. All rights reserved.

Clinical impact of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in the fecal flora of hematological patients with neutropenia and levofloxacin prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia and hematological malignancies is said to be effective on febrile netropenia (FN)-related infection and mortality; however, the emergence of antibiotic resistance has become a concern. Ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin prophylaxis are most commonly recommended. A significant increase in the rate of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in fecal flora has been reported following ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. The acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli after levofloxacin use has not been evaluated.

METHODS

We prospectively examined the incidence of quinolone-resistant E. coli isolates recovered from stool cultures before and after levofloxacin prophylaxis in patients with neutropenia from August 2011 to May 2013. Some patients received chemotherapy multiple times.

RESULTS

In this trial, 68 patients were registered. Levofloxacin-resistant E. coli isolates were detected from 11 and 13 of all patients before and after the prophylaxis, respectively. However, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.65). Multiple prophylaxis for sequential chemotherapy did not induce additional quinolone resistance among E. coli isolates. Interestingly, quinolone-resistant E. coli, most of which were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers, were already detected in approximately 20% of all patients before the initiation of prophylaxis. FN-related bacteremia developed in 2 patients, accompanied by a good prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Levofloxacin prophylaxis for neutropenia did not result in a significant acquisition of quinolone-resistant E. coli. However, we detected previous colonization of quinolone-resistant E. coli before prophylaxis, which possibly reflects the spread of ESBL. The epidemic spread of resistant E. coli as a local factor may influence strategies toward the use of quinolone prophylaxis.

Antimicrobial stewardship in patients with cancer

Consensus guidelines recommend antimicrobial stewardship in all hospitals with the following goals in mind: appropriate and judicious use of antimicrobial agents leading to increased drug safety, reduced antimicrobial utilization, reduction in the development and selection of resistant organisms, cost containment, and improved patient outcomes. Patients with cancer, especially those with hematologic malignancies and neutropenia, develop serious infections often and receive antimicrobial therapy frequently. Consequently, there is considerable opportunity to practice antimicrobial stewardship in this population. Several antimicrobial stewardship strategies such as antimicrobial restriction, cycling, prospective audit and feedback, and de-escalation have been evaluated in patients with cancer. The primary focus has been on the prevention and treatment of bacterial infections in febrile neutropenic patients. These efforts should be expanded to include fungal, viral, and other infections.

Primary prophylaxis of bacterial infections and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors : guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (DGHO)

Bacterial infections are the most common cause for treatment-related mortality in patients with neutropenia after chemotherapy. Here, we discuss the use of antibacterial prophylaxis against bacteria and Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in neutropenic cancer patients and offer guidance towards the choice of drug. A literature search was performed to screen all articles published between September 2000 and January 2012 on antibiotic prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients. The authors assembled original reports and meta-analysis from the literature and drew conclusions, which were discussed and approved in a consensus conference of the Infectious Disease Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Oncology (AGIHO). Antibacterial prophylaxis has led to a reduction of febrile events and infections. A significant reduction of overall mortality could only be shown in a meta-analysis. Fluoroquinolones are preferred for antibacterial and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole for PCP prophylaxis. Due to serious concerns about an increase of resistant pathogens, only patients at high risk of severe infections should be considered for antibiotic prophylaxis. Risk factors of individual patients and local resistance patterns must be taken into account. Risk factors, choice of drug for antibacterial and PCP prophylaxis and concerns regarding the use of prophylactic antibiotics are discussed in the review.