Multiple chemical sensitivities--syndrome and solution

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: It's time to catch up to the science

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is a complex medical condition associated with low dose chemical exposures. MCS is characterized by diverse features and common comorbidities, including fibromyalgia, cough hypersensitivity, asthma, and migraine, and stress/anxiety, with which the syndrome shares numerous neurobiological processes and altered functioning within diverse brain regions. Predictive factors linked to MCS comprise genetic influences, gene-environment interactions, oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, cell dysfunction, and psychosocial influences. The development of MCS may be attributed to the sensitization of transient receptor potential (TRP) receptors, notably TRPV1 and TRPA1. Capsaicin inhalation challenge studies demonstrated that TRPV1 sensitization is manifested in MCS, and functional brain imaging studies revealed that TRPV1 and TRPA1 agonists promote brain-region specific neuronal variations. Unfortunately, MCS has often been inappropriately viewed as stemming exclusively from psychological disturbances, which has fostered patients being stigmatized and ostracized, and often being denied accommodation for their disability. Evidence-based education is essential to provide appropriate support and advocacy. Greater recognition of receptor-mediated biological mechanisms should be incorporated in laws, and regulation of environmental exposures.

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity

Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (MCS), a condition also known as Chemical Sensitivity (CS), Chemical Intolerance (CI), Idiopathic Environmental Illness (IEI) and Toxicant Induced Loss of Tolerance (TILT), is an acquired multifactorial syndrome characterized by a recurrent set of debilitating symptoms. The symptoms of this controversial disorder are reported to be induced by environmental chemicals at doses far below those usually harmful to most persons. They involve a large spectrum of organ systems and typically disappear when the environmental chemicals are removed. However, no clear link has emerged among self-reported MCS symptoms and widely accepted objective measures of physiological dysfunction, and no clear dose-response relationship between exposure and symptom reactions has been observed. In addition, the underlying etiology and pathogenic processes of the disorder remain unknown and disputed, although biologic and psychologic hypotheses abound. It is currently debated whether MCS should be considered a clinical entity at all. Nevertheless, in the last few decades MCS has received considerable scientific and governmental attention in light of the many persons reporting this illness. In this review, we provide a general overview of the history, definition, demographics, prevalence, and etiologic challenges in defining and understanding MCS.

Exploratory Investigation of a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Intervention and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Odor Sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced odor sensitivity is a phenomenon that potentially underlies conditions such as multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS). Currently, there are no treatments that have been shown to effectively decrease odor sensitivity. Given similarities of odor hypersensitivity/MCS to pain sensitization disorders such as fibromyalgia, there may be a potential for interventions that improve pain tolerance to modulate odor sensitivity.

METHODS

This exploratory study randomized 72 healthy community adult volunteers to receive one of six treatments in between two assessments of thermal pain tolerance and odor threshold. Participants were randomized to receive either cathodal, anodal, or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) aimed at dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. In addition, participants were provided a brief cognitive behavioral intervention (CBI) for pain consisting of task framing, cognitive restructuring, and distraction technique training, or a control intervention consisting of information about pain.

RESULTS

Persons who received a brief CBI showed significantly increased odor thresholds (reduced sensitivity) during intervention (F (1,62) = 7.29, p = .009, ηp = .11), whereas the control intervention was not associated with altered odor thresholds. Moreover, in those who received brief CBI, more severe anxiety associated with larger reductions in odor sensitivity (ρ = .364, p = .035). There was no effect of tDCS (F (2,62) = .11, p = .90) nor interaction between tDCS and CBI (F (2,62) = .32, p = .73).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the connection between anxiety and MCS, results suggest that CBT techniques for somatic processes may show promise in treating conditions characterized by increased sensitivity to odors (e.g., MCS).

Personality, mental distress, and subjective health complaints among persons with environmental annoyance

The aim of this study was to assess possible early determinants of idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI), contributing to an integrated model for the development of IEI. Questionnaires concerning personality traits, current mental distress, subjective health complaints, work load and satisfaction, and options for recovery, were given to 84 persons from the general population attributing annoyance to (i) chemicals/smells (smell-annoyed (SA) n= 29); (ii) electrical equipment (electrically annoyed (EA) n= 16); and (iii) both smells and electricity (generally annoyed (GA) n= 39), but otherwise healthy and in active work. Compared to referents ( n= 54), the EA and GA groups showed strongly elevated scores on 5/6 scales within the trait anxiety/neuroticism personality dimension, while the SA group had a slight elevation on only one anxiety scale. Current mental distress and subjective health complaints scores were generally elevated in the EA and GA groups, but only partially in the SA group. Higher proportions of the EA, GA, and SA groups reported low satisfaction with their work situation, including more frequent fatigue after work and a higher, and often unfulfilled, need for recovery. The findings suggest that trait anxiety is prominent already at prodromal stages of IEI, possibly indicating that trait anxiety facilitates the acquisition of attribution of health complaints to environmental factors.

Discriminating between organic and psychological determinants of multiple chemical sensitivity: a case study

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is a controversial disorder characterized by a diverse set of debilitating symptoms purportedly induced by environmental chemicals. Many cases of putative MCS are believed to have a strong psychogenic component, making it difficult to differentiate between organic and psychogenic causes. In this case report we describe a procedure that can aid in this differentiation. A patient who met a strict set of criteria for MCS was tested on two test occasions. On the first, the patient was found to have no olfactory dysfunction, as determined from standardized olfactory tests. On the second, odorants, as well as a blank stimulus, were presented to the patient with instructions as to whether they were harmful or harmless. The patient's task was to estimate the intensity of each odorant and report any induced MCS-related symptoms. Potentially harmful odorants presented as harmless were judged significantly less intense, and triggered fewer symptoms, than harmless odorants presented as harmful. When an odorless stimulus was presented as harmful, the patient provided higher intensity evaluations and exhibited more symptoms than when it was presented as harmless. These phenomena were not present in three non-MCS controls. This straight-forward procedure allowed us to determine that the MCS symptoms of this patient were largely psychological and may be of general value for identifying psychogenic cases of MCS.

Issues with the integration of technical information in planning for and responding to nontraditional disasters

In the post-9/11 environment, it has become recognized that the response to man-made disasters (such as chemical spills, bioterrorism, and radiation dispersal) requires a much broader range of tools and technical knowledge than needed for natural disasters (i.e., hurricanes, earthquakes, or drought). This need also requires that those who develop technical information for disaster planning maintain a broader perspective of how the information will be used and what the priorities are for developing new information. In addition, the ability to communicate information within a context understandable to the "end user" has become more critical. The intent of this article is to present issues to help those who traditionally collect and interpret technical information (toxicology, risk assessment, mitigation planners, etc.) to better understand how their information is used in planning for and responding to incidents. These issues are similar to those experienced when trying to provide the users of information provided on material safety data sheets (MSDS) with an understanding of the value and limits of such information in decision making. Confounding the problem are the many sources that provide exposure limits and the limited amount of time the user has to understand the limits of the data during an emergency. While the Federal Response Plan integrates the efforts of multiple agencies, the "on-scene" responders are faced with trying to respond to contradictory strategies and applications of information. Sources of response technical information need to better communicate the limits of application/interpretation of that information in emergency situations.

Psychiatric morbidity and low self-attentiveness in patients with environmental illness

Controversy surrounds the origin of symptoms attributed to environmental pollutants or widely used chemicals, and the authors believed that a psychiatric evaluation could advance understanding of this contentious condition. They assessed psychiatric morbidity, somatization, and self-attentiveness in patients seen in their Environmental Clinic. Two hundred ninety-five consecutive patients underwent SCID-I and -II interviews and were investigated with self-rating scales for self-attentiveness and somatization. The authors found a high prevalence of mental disorders (66% had a current SCID diagnosis, and 75% had a lifetime SCID diagnosis) and a low level of self-attentiveness, which was not necessarily associated with psychiatric disease. Among patients visiting an Environmental Clinic, mental disorders were common and needed to be diagnosed and treated by standard interventions. Patients who did not meet diagnostic criteria for a psychiatric disorder had relatively low somatization scores and low private self-attentiveness. These "externalizers" could benefit from an intervention that teaches them to focus on their internal and emotional lives. In these patients, the authors consider low self-attentiveness a major feature that may act as a pathogenic factor for environmental illness.

Generalization of acquired somatic symptoms in response to odors: a pavlovian perspective on multiple chemical sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

Somatic symptoms that occur in response to odors can be acquired in a pavlovian conditioning paradigm. The present study investigated 1) whether learned symptoms can generalize to new odors, 2) whether the generalization gradient is linked to the affective or irritant quality of the new odors, and 3) whether the delay between acquisition and testing modulates generalization.

METHODS

Conditional odor stimuli (CS) were (diluted) ammonia and niaouli. One odor was mixed with 7.4% CO2-enriched air (unconditional stimulus) during 2-minute breathing trials (CS+ trial), and the other odor was presented with air (CS- trial). Three CS+ and three CS- trials were conducted in a semirandomized order (acquisition phase). The test phase involved one CS+-only (CS+ without CO2) and one CS- test trial, followed by three trials using new odors (butyric acid, acetic acid, and citric aroma). Half of the subjects (N = 28) were tested immediately, and the other half were tested after 1 week. Ventilatory responses were measured during and somatic symptoms were measured after each trial.

RESULTS

Participants had more symptoms in response to CS+-only exposures, but only when ammonia was used as the CS+. Also, generalization occurred: More symptoms were reported in response to butyric and acetic acid than to citric aroma and only in participants who had been conditioned. Both the selective conditioning and the generalization effect were mediated by negative affectivity of the participants. The delay between the acquisition and test phases had no effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms that occur in response to odorous substances can be learned and generalize to new substances, especially in persons with high negative affectivity. The findings further support the plausibility of a pavlovian perspective of multiple chemical sensitivity.

Chemical sensitivity and fatigue syndromes from hypoxia/hypercapnia

The multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome (MCS) and other chronic syndromes causing fatigue, headache and other protean CNS symptoms without observable signs, are proposed to result from hypoxia/hypercapnia (H/H) due to disturbed breathing. The concept is explained in terms of sleep apnea (SA), although H/H could result from causes other than SA. Reasons for considering this etiologic linkage are as follows: 1. MCS symptoms resemble those of SA. 2. The only physical signs associated with MCS (upper airway inflammation and obstruction) can aggravate SA. 3. The only neuropsychiatric finding common among MCS symptomatics, reduced verbal recall, is associated with SA. 4. Many MCS symptomatics attribute onset of their condition to a pesticide or solvent exposure. Solvent neurotoxicity may cause cacosmia, a symptom of MCS and SA. 5. Improved upper airway patency, a first-line therapy in SA, may improve symptoms in some MCS-like conditions. Implications for diagnosis and treatment of MCS are discussed.

Olfaction and symptoms in the multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome

Whereas most idiosyncratic environmental sensitivity complaints do not fit known diagnoses, the multiple chemical sensitivities syndrome (MCS) is an extreme presentation that has defined diagnostic criteria. MCS symptomatics claim that they acquired a sensitized state as the result of a chemical exposure, usually to a solvent or pesticide, but not to a fragrance. Before this exposure, they did not experience symptoms. Following sensitization, symptoms increasing in number and severity with time are attributed by the MCS symptomatic to various exposures that are innocuous to most individuals. Although phenomenological studies have provided no evidence that particular odors elicit MCS symptoms, low levels of fragrances and perfumes are frequently associated with the reporting of MCS symptoms. This evaluation examines proposed mechanisms by which odorants and fragrances might cause either sensitization or elicitation of MCS symptoms, including altered odor sensitivity, primary irritancy or irritancy-induced upper airway reactivity, neurogenic switching of trigeminal irritancy signals, time-dependent sensitization and limbic kindling, CNS toxicity, and various psychiatric conditions. In no case was there persuasive evidence that any olfactory mechanism involving fragrance underlies either induction of a sensitized state or the triggering of MCS symptoms. Fragrances and other odorants could, however, be associated with symptoms as claimed by MCS symptomatics, because they are recognizable stimuli, but fragrance has not been demonstrated to be causal in the usual sense.

Multiple chemical sensitivity as a conditional response

Pavlovian conditioning may contribute to some cases of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS). On the basis of the conditioning analysis, environmental stimuli (especially olfactory cues) present at the time of a toxicant overdose become associated with the toxicant and elicit aversive conditional responses. Similar associations have been reported in patients receiving chemotherapy, and the literature on such 'pretreatment nausea' in cancer patients is relevant to understanding the role of conditioning in MCS. Evaluation of the contribution of conditioning to MCS has been complicated by confounding interpretations that emphasize conditional responses with interpretations which emphasize the psychiatric status of the patient. Appreciation of the contribution of Pavlovian conditioning to MCS will lead to a better understanding of this complex disorder.

Pavlovian conditioning and multiple chemical sensitivity

Pavlovian conditioning processes may contribute to some symptoms of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS). This review summarizes the potential relevance of the literature on conditional taste and olfactory aversions, conditional sensitization, and conditional immunomodulation to understanding MCS. A conditioning-based perspective on MCS suggests novel research and treatment strategies.