Fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures. A comparison between sliding screw plate and four cancellous bone screws

The small screw-apex distance is potentially associated with femoral head osteonecrosis in adults with femoral neck fractures treated by closed reduction and percutaneous 3 parallel cannulated screws

OBJECTIVE

Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) are among the most common fractures in elderly individuals. Surgery is the main treatment for FNFs, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is one of the unacceptable complications. This study aimed to assess both the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with FNFs treated with three parallel cannulated screws and to identify relationship between screws position and ONFH.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 100 patients who were treated with closed reduction and fixed with 3 parallel cannulated screws met the inclusion criteria between January 2014 and December 2020 at authors' institution. The follow-up duration, age, sex, affected side, and injury-to-surgery interval were collected; the neck-shaft angle of both hips, screw-apex distance (SAD) and the tip-apex distance (TAD)were measured; and the Garden classification, quality of reduction and presence of ONFH were evaluated.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 37 males and 63 females, with 60 left and 40 right hips affected. The mean age of patients was 54.93 ± 12.24 years, and the mean follow-up was 56.3 ± 13.38 months. The overall incidence of ONFH was 13%. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of ONFH by affected side, age, fracture displacement, injury-to-surgery interval, neck-shaft angle deviation, or reduction quality. The SAD was significantly shorter in ONFH patients than in normal patients for all three screws (p = 0.02, 0.02, and 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The short SAD of all screws is associated with femoral head necrosis of FNFs treated with 3 cannulated screws. The short SAD indicated that screws malpositioning in the weight-bearing area of the femoral head, potentially harming the blood supply and compromising the anchorage of the primary compressive trabeculae in this region.

Comparative Study for Osteosynthesis of Femoral Neck Fractures: Cannulated Screws versus Femoral Neck System

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare the radiological results of fixation using the femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated screw (CS) for treatment of femoral neck fractures.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study of patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent internal fixation and had follow-up of more than six months from 2010 to 2020 was conducted. A total of 87 patients were enrolled in the study. The FNS group included 20 patients and the CS group included 67 patients. Classification of fractures was performed according to Garden and Pauwels classification. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, sliding distance of the implant, lateral soft tissue irritation caused by implants, and complications were evaluated.

Results

The mean operation time was 40.30 minutes in the FNS group and 46.84 minutes in the CS group. The mean intraoperative bleeding volume was 51.25 mL in the FNS group and 72.16 mL in the CS group. Bone union was achieved in 18 patients in the FNS group (90.0%) and in 61 patients in the CS group (91.0%). The mean sliding distance of the implant was 4.06 mm in the FNS group and 3.92 mm in the CS group. No patients in the FNS group and 12 patients in the CS group complained of soft tissue irritation.

Conclusion

A shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, and less irritation of soft tissue were observed in the FNS group. FNS could be an alternative to CS for fixation of femoral neck fractures.

Comparison of femoral neck system to multiple cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws in the treatment of femoral neck fractures

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term outcomes of the femoral neck system (FNS) with multiple cancellous screws (MCS) and dynamic hip screws (DHS) in the treatment of femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 157 patients with fresh femoral neck fractures treated with FNS (from September 2019 to October 2020), MCS, and DHS (from January 2018 to October 2020). According to internal fixation methods, all patients were divided into the FNS group (54 cases), MCS group (51 cases), and DHS group (52 cases). Demographic data were also collected, recorded, and compared, including the follow-up time, days of hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times (IFT), weight-bearing time (WBT), length of femoral neck shortening (LFNS), Harris hip score, and complications (such as internal fixation failure, bone nonunion, and avascular necrosis of the femoral head) between the three groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 157 patients with a mean age of 61.8 (range, 18-89) years were analyzed. In the FNS group, IFT (median 10.5) was significantly lower than that in the MCS group (median 21) and DHS group (median 20.5) (P<0.05), and WBT was significantly earlier than that of the MCS group (P<0.05). In the FNS group, the median hospitalization time, operation time, and blood loss were 2 (2, 4) days, 45 (40-59) min, and 30 (20, 50) ml, respectively. They were all significantly less than 3.5 (3, 6) days, 72 (55-88.75) min, and 50 (30, 50) ml in the DHS group, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in LFNS, quality of reduction, internal fixation failure rate, and Harris hip score at the latest follow-up (P>0.05). No surgical complications such as incision infection, deep infection, pulmonary embolism, or femoral head necrosis were found in any of the three groups.

CONCLUSION

FNS, MCS, and DHS are all effective for femoral neck fractures. However, a lower IFT of FNS shortens the operation time. Compared to MCS, FNS has the advantages of being a simple operation, with early WBT; compared to DHS, a minimally invasive operation is the main advantage of FNS.

Curative efficacy of surgical procedures for older patients with femoral neck fracture: a network meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Femoral neck fractures have a higher incidence in older people with poor prognosis, inducing serious social problems. Common treatment methods include total hip arthroplasty, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, double-screw fixation, multiple-screw fixation, and dynamic hip system.

METHODS

We searched through four electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, for articles regarding femoral neck fractures, bone screw, and hip prosthesis published up to February 11, 2020. All included articles were used for quality evaluation and data extraction. Extracted data were expressed as odds ratios or weighted mean differences, with 95% confidence intervals. We conducted a network meta-analysis for Harris hip score, complications, 1-year mortality rate, reoperation rate, intraoperative blood loss, and duration of operation using STATA version 16.0 software.

RESULTS

Twenty-two randomized controlled trials and nine cohort studies included in this study involved 3861 patients. Total hip arthroplasty significantly improved the postoperative function of patients with femoral neck fractures. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve value of the Harris hip score for more than 1 year after total hip arthroplasty was 98.2.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated no significant difference in mortality among different treatment groups. Total hip arthroplasty can provide satisfactory outcomes in hip joint function, and double-screw fixation results in the lowest intraoperative risk. In general, total hip arthroplasty results in a lower incidence of adverse events and is especially recommended for patients with femoral neck fractures. This article has been retrospectively registered on the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (INPLASY) on November 27, 2020. Registration number: INPLASY2020110123.

Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a major healthcare problem, presenting a considerable challenge and burden to individuals and healthcare systems. The number of hip fractures globally is rising rapidly. The majority of intracapsular hip fractures are treated surgically.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relative effects (benefits and harms) of all surgical treatments used in the management of intracapsular hip fractures in older adults, using a network meta-analysis of randomised trials, and to generate a hierarchy of interventions according to their outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and five other databases in July 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, reference lists of retrieved articles and conducted backward-citation searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing different treatments for fragility intracapsular hip fractures in older adults. We included total hip arthroplasties (THAs), hemiarthroplasties (HAs), internal fixation, and non-operative treatments. We excluded studies of people with hip fracture with specific pathologies other than osteoporosis or resulting from high-energy trauma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. One review author completed data extraction which was checked by a second review author. We collected data for three outcomes at different time points: mortality and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) - both reported within 4 months, at 12 months, and after 24 months of surgery, and unplanned return to theatre (at end of study follow-up). We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) with Stata software, using frequentist methods, and calculated the differences between treatments using risk ratios (RRs) and standardised mean differences (SMDs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also performed direct comparisons using the same codes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 119 studies (102 RCTS, 17 quasi-RCTs) with 17,653 participants with 17,669 intracapsular fractures in the review; 83% of fractures were displaced. The mean participant age ranged from 60 to 87 years and 73% were women.  After discussion with clinical experts, we selected 12 nodes that represented the best balance between clinical plausibility and efficiency of the networks: cemented modern unipolar HA, dynamic fixed angle plate, uncemented first-generation bipolar HA, uncemented modern bipolar HA, cemented modern bipolar HA, uncemented first-generation unipolar HA, uncemented modern unipolar HA, THA with single articulation, dual-mobility THA, pins, screws, and non-operative treatment. Seventy-five studies (with 11,855 participants) with data for at least two of these treatments contributed to the NMA. We selected cemented modern unipolar HA as a reference treatment against which other treatments were compared. This was a common treatment in the networks, providing a clinically appropriate comparison. In order to provide a concise summary of the results, we report only network estimates when there was evidence of difference between treatments. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for serious and very serious risks of bias and when estimates included possible transitivity, particularly for internal fixation which included more undisplaced fractures. We also downgraded for incoherence, or inconsistency in indirect estimates, although this affected few estimates. Most estimates included the possibility of benefits and harms, and we downgraded the evidence for these treatments for imprecision.  We found that cemented modern unipolar HA, dynamic fixed angle plate and pins seemed to have the greatest likelihood of reducing mortality at 12 months. Overall, 23.5% of participants who received the reference treatment died within 12 months of surgery. Uncemented modern bipolar HA had higher mortality than the reference treatment (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.85; derived only from indirect evidence; low-certainty evidence), and THA with single articulation also had higher mortality (network estimate RR 1.62, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.32; derived from direct evidence from 2 studies with 225 participants, and indirect evidence; very low-certainty evidence). In the remaining treatments, the certainty of the evidence ranged from low to very low, and we noted no evidence of any differences in mortality at 12 months.  We found that THA (single articulation), cemented modern bipolar HA and uncemented modern bipolar HA seemed to have the greatest likelihood of improving HRQoL at 12 months. This network was comparatively sparse compared to other outcomes and the certainty of the evidence of differences between treatments was very low. We noted no evidence of any differences in HRQoL at 12 months, although estimates were imprecise. We found that arthroplasty treatments seemed to have a greater likelihood of reducing unplanned return to theatre than internal fixation and non-operative treatment. We estimated that 4.3% of participants who received the reference treatment returned to theatre during the study follow-up. Compared to this treatment, we found low-certainty evidence that more participants returned to theatre if they were treated with a dynamic fixed angle plate (network estimate RR 4.63, 95% CI 2.94 to 7.30; from direct evidence from 1 study with 190 participants, and indirect evidence). We found very low-certainty evidence that more participants returned to theatre when treated with pins (RR 4.16, 95% CI 2.53 to 6.84; only from indirect evidence), screws (network estimate RR 5.04, 95% CI 3.25 to 7.82; from direct evidence from 2 studies with 278 participants, and indirect evidence), and non-operative treatment (RR 5.41, 95% CI 1.80 to 16.26; only from indirect evidence). There was very low-certainty evidence of a tendency for an increased risk of unplanned return to theatre for all of the arthroplasty treatments, and in particular for THA, compared with cemented modern unipolar HA, with little evidence to suggest the size of this difference varied strongly between the arthroplasty treatments.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There was considerable variability in the ranking of each treatment such that there was no one outstanding, or subset of outstanding, superior treatments. However, cemented modern arthroplasties tended to more often yield better outcomes than alternative treatments and may be a more successful approach than internal fixation. There is no evidence of a difference between THA (single articulation) and cemented modern unipolar HA in the outcomes measured in this review. THA may be an appropriate treatment for a subset of people with intracapsular fracture but we have not explored this further.

Clinical Results of Dual SC Screw: A Mini-Sliding Hip Screw with an Anti-rotating Screw for Femoral Neck Fractures

Backgroud

Dual SC screw (DSCS) is a unique concept internal fixation device consisting of a sliding screw and barrel assembly that enables compression force to be applied to the femoral neck fracture side. There are two types of barrels: a thread barrel and a plate barrel that has a one-holed side plate to prevent varus deformity. We report clinical results of the application of a DSCS with combined use of a thread barrel screw as an anti-rotational screw and a plate barrel screw as a compression hip screw.

Methods

We used DSCS for femoral neck fractures in 196 hip joints of 190 patients between November 2005 and June 2017. Among them, 70 hips in 66 patients (13 men and 53 women; mean age, 73.2 years) were followed up for at least 24 months. There were 53 nondisplaced fractures (Garden's classification stage 1 or 2) and 17 displaced fractures (stage 3 or 4). We evaluated the postoperative walking ability of the patients who were followed up for at least 24 months and examined details of all complications.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 37.4 months (range, 24–144 months). Forty-two (64%) out of the 66 patients who were followed up for at least 2 years were able to walk independently with or without a cane. The incidence of complications was 11.5% in nondisplaced fractures and 17.5% in displaced fractures, and arthroplasty was required in 5.8% and 5.0%, respectively. The most frequent complication was secondary displacement including cutout and shortening of the femoral neck, but no implants showed varus displacement.

Conclusions

The application of DSCS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures had satisfactory results. The complication rate was low, and there was no postoperative varus displacement of DSCS in either displaced or nondisplaced fractures. We suggest DSCS is a reliable option for both displaced and nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.

Treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture with medial femoral neck support screw: a biomechanical and clinical study

A femoral neck fracture is currently one of the most common types of fracture in clinical practice. The incidence continues to increase due to traffic accidents, trauma, and osteoporosis. This research includes a biomechanical study and a clinical retrospective study. In the biomechanical studies, three groups' effects (Control Group: 3CCS, DHS group, and study Group: 3CCS + mFNSS group) were compared by vertical compression tests, torsion tests, and fatigue tests. All the data were collected and analyzed. We subsequently performed a retrospective analysis of 131 patients with femoral neck fractures. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, quality of postoperative fracture reduction, and follow-up observation of fracture healing, screw retreatment rates and fixation failure rates, as well as femoral head necrosis rates and hip function in two groups with 3CCS and 3CCS + mFNSS were compared. By the biomechanical study, we found that 3CCS + Mfnss group were biomechanically superior to 3CCS group and superior to the DHS group in terms of resistance to torsion. However, it was less effective than the DHS group in compressive strength and fatigue resistance. In terms of clinical application, 3CCS + mFNSS group was found to have lower screw retreatment rates and femoral head necrosis rates, and to have better fracture healing rates than group with 3CCS, indicating that medial support screws can effectively resist the vertical shear forces of fracture ends and promote the stability and healing of fracture ends, as well as to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

Modified F configuration in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a finite element analysis

Background

The optimal treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture (FNF) in young patients remains a worldwide challenge in orthopedic surgery.

Methods

Finite element models of four internal fixations were developed to treat Pauwels type III FNF: a: the traditional inverted triangular parallel cannulated screw (PCS) model, b: the F-technique cannulated screw model, c: the modified F-technique cannulated screw model using a fully threaded screw instead of a partially threaded distally, d: the dynamic hip screw coupled with derotational screw (DHS + DS) model. Under the same conditions, finite element analyses were carried out to compare the displacement and von Mises stress distribution of four internal fixations and femurs, the maximum crack distances of the fracture surfaces, Z axis displacements of four models as well as the stress distribution in the subtrochanteric region.

Results

The modified F-technique configuration resulted in a more stable fixation as compared to the other three configurations, with respect to the maximum displacement and stress peaks of femur and internal fixations, the maximum crack distances of the fracture surfaces, Z axis displacements of four configurations as well as the stress distribution in the subtrochanteric region.

Conclusions

Our results suggested that modified F-technique configuration show a better performance in resisting shearing and rotational forces in treating Pauwels type III FNF compared to those using traditional inverted triangular PCS, the F-technique configuration or DHS + DS, providing a new choice for the treatment of FNFs.

Internal fixation implants for intracapsular hip fractures in older adults

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a major healthcare problem, presenting a huge challenge and burden to patients, healthcare systems and society. The increased proportion of older adults in the world population means that the absolute number of hip fractures is rising rapidly across the globe. The majority of hip fractures are treated surgically. This review evaluates evidence for types of internal fixation implants used in joint-preserving surgery for intracapsular hip fractures.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative effects (benefits and harms) of different implants for the internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures in older adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos, Proquest Dissertations and Theses, and National Technical Information Service in July 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, reference lists of retrieved articles and conducted backward-citation searches.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing implants used for internal fixation of fragility intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in older adults. Types of implants were smooth pins (these include pins with fold-out hooks), screws, or fixed angle plates. We excluded studies in which all or most fractures were caused by specific pathologies other than osteoporosis or were the result of a high energy trauma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. One review author extracted data and assessed risk of bias which was checked by a second review author. We collected data for seven outcomes: activities of daily living (ADL), delirium, functional status, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), mobility, mortality (reported within four months of surgery as early mortality, and at 12 months since surgery), and unplanned return to theatre for treating a complication resulting directly or indirectly from the primary procedure (such as deep infection or non-union). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for these outcomes using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 38 studies (32 RCTs, six quasi-RCTs) with 8585 participants with 8590 intracapsular fractures. The mean ages of participants in the studies ranged from 60 to 84 years; 73% were women, and 38% of fractures were undisplaced. We report here the findings of the four main comparisons, which were between different categories of implants. We downgraded the certainty of the outcomes for imprecision (when data were available from insufficient numbers of participants or the confidence interval (CI) was wide), study limitations (e.g. high or unclear risks of bias), and inconsistency (when we noted substantial levels of statistical heterogeneity). Smooth pins versus fixed angle plate (four studies, 1313 participants) We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in independent mobility with no more than one walking stick (1 study, 112 participants), early mortality (1 study, 383 participants), mortality at 12 months (2 studies, 661 participants), and unplanned return to theatre (3 studies, 736 participants). No studies reported on ADL, delirium, functional status, or HRQoL. Screws versus fixed angle plates (11 studies, 2471 participants) We found low-certainty evidence of no clinically important differences between the two implant types in functional status using WOMAC (MD -3.18, 95% CI -6.35 to -0.01; 2 studies, 498 participants; range of scores from 0 to 96, lower values indicate better function), and HRQoL using EQ-5D (MD 0.03, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.06; 2 studies, 521 participants; range -0.654 (worst), 0 (dead), 1 (best)). We also found low-certainty evidence showing little or no difference between the two implant types in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.31; 7 studies, 1690 participants), and unplanned return to theatre (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.26; 11 studies, 2321 participants). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in independent mobility (1 study, 70 participants), and early mortality (3 studies, 467 participants). No studies reported on ADL or delirium. Screws versus smooth pins (seven studies, 1119 participants) We found low-certainty evidence of no or little difference between the two implant types in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.35; 6 studies, 1005 participants; low-certainty evidence). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two implant types in early mortality (3 studies, 584 participants) and unplanned return to theatre (5 studies, 862 participants). No studies reported on ADL, delirium, functional status, HRQoL, or mobility. Screws or smooth pins versus fixed angle plates (15 studies, 3784 participants) In this comparison, we combined data from the first two comparison groups. We found low-certainty evidence of no or little difference between the two groups of implants in mortality at 12 months (RR 1.04, 95% CI.083 to 1.31; 7 studies, 1690 participants) and unplanned return to theatre (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.18; 14 studies, 3057 participants). We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the two groups of implants in independent mobility (2 studies, 182 participants), and early mortality (4 studies, 850 participants). We found no additional evidence to support the findings for functional status or HRQoL as reported in 'Screws versus fixed angle plates'. No studies reported ADL or delirium.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is low-certainty evidence that there may be little or no difference between screws and fixed angle plates in functional status, HRQoL, mortality at 12 months, or unplanned return to theatre; and between screws and pins in mortality at 12 months. The limited and very low-certainty evidence for the outcomes for which data were available for the smooth pins versus fixed angle plates comparison, as well as the other outcomes for which data were available for the screws and fixed angle plates, and screws and pins comparisons means we have very little confidence in the estimates of effect for these outcomes. Additional RCTs would increase the certainty of the evidence. We encourage such studies to report outcomes consistent with the core outcome set for hip fracture, including long-term quality of life indicators such as ADL and mobility.

Treatment of femoral neck fractures: sliding hip screw or cannulated screws? A meta-analysis

Purpose

Femoral neck fractures are still unsolved problems nowadays; sliding hip screw (SHS) and cannulated compression screw (CCS) are the most commonly used devices. We evaluated the clinical outcomes and complications in the treatment of femoral neck fractures between SHS and CCS in this meta-analysis to find which is better.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library up to 24 August 2020 and retrieved any studies comparing sliding hip screw and cannulated compression screw in treatment of femoral neck fractures; the main outcomes and complications were extracted from the studies which were included.

Results

Nine studies involving 1662 patients (828 patients in the SHS group and 834 patients in the CCS group) were included in this study. SHS had higher rate of avascular necrosis (RR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.08–1.56, p = 0.005), and CCS had higher rate of implant removal (RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.43–0.93, p = 0.02). No significant statistical difference in non-union, implant failure, infection, replacement, mortality, orthopedic complications, non-orthopedic complications, and total revision between SHS and CCS group.

Conclusion

Both devices have their pros and cons; SHS had a higher rate of avascular necrosis, and CCS had a higher rate of implant removal rate. No significant statistical difference in non-union, implant failure, infection, replacement, mortality, orthopedic complications, non-orthopedic complications, and total revision between SHS and CCS group.

Dynamic hip screws versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Dynamic hip screw (DHS) and cannulated screws (CS) are widely used for femoral neck fractures. However, there is no definite result as to which surgical method bring less complications. We performed this study to compare the complication (mortality, non-union, avascular necrosis (AVN), and revision) of DHS and CS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures patients.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other relevant studies related the comparison of DHS versus CS for femoral neck fractures from inception to Jan 7, 2020. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Newcastle-Ottawa (NOS), respectively. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.2 software.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs and seven retrospective cohort studies were included for meta-analysis. CS was found to be superior to DHS with respect to AVN rate (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.08-1.99; p = 0.01, I² = 0%). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to mortality, non-union, and revision (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DHS and CS have similar complication including mortality, revision rate, and non-union, but CS has superior to DHS on ANV. However, further studies are required to provide more robust evidence owing to some limitations.

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Modified Cannulated Screws Fixation of Unstable Femoral Neck Fracture with Comminuted Posteromedial Cortex

Purpose

To verify the biomechanical importance with respect to the integrity of posteromedial cortex of femoral neck fracture (FNF) and demonstrate whether the modified fixation of cannulated screws (CSs) could increase the biomechanical strength.

Methods

A total of 24 left artificial femurs were randomly divided into three groups. The osteotomy was made in the center of the femoral neck at a 20° angle to the shaft axial. The posteromedial cortices of femoral neck were removed in groups B and C. In group A, 8 femurs with intact posteromedial cortex were fixed with three parallel partial thread screws (PTSs), forming a standard triangle. In group B, the femurs were stabilized with the same fixation of CSs like group A. In group C, two inferior PTSs were replaced by two fully thread screws (FTSs).

Results

The lower A-P and axial stiffness and load to failure along with higher axial displacement were found in group B compared with group A (p≤0.001 for all). Between groups B and C, the modified fixation of CSs increased A-P and axial stiffness and load to failure and reduced the axial displacement (p≤0.001 for all).

Conclusions

We verified that the comminuted posteromedial cortex affected the biomechanical strength adversely and resulted in higher displacement. The modified fixation of CSs characterized by two inferior FTSs could improve the biomechanical performance and buttress the femoral head fragment better.

Failure Patterns of Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation in Young Patients

The primary purpose of this study was to describe the failure patterns of femoral neck fracture fixation in young patients. The secondary purpose was to determine if pattern of failure varies by type of implant. Adult patients (age range, 18-55 years) who experienced a "fixation failure" following internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture were identified from 5 level 1 trauma centers. Failure was defined by screw cutout, implant breakage, varus collapse (<120° neck-shaft angle), or severe fracture shortening (≥1 cm). When multiple complications were identified, mechanical failures were preferentially noted for the analysis. Failure patterns were compared between patients who received multiple cancellous screws and patients who received a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw. Severe fracture shortening was the most common complication identified (61%). No differences in the incidence of severe shortening (P=.750) or implant breakage (P=1.000) were detected between the fixation groups. However, among the failures with a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw construct, a greater portion were related to screw cutout (38% for a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw vs 7% for screws, P=.019). Failures with multiple screws were associated with varus collapse (25% for screws vs 0% for a sliding hip screw plus a derotation screw, P=.037). Severe shortening was the most common fixation failure. Sliding hip screw plus derotation screw implants were associated with screw cutout. Multiple cancellous screw implants failed by varus collapse. Selecting a surgical implant based on its likely failure pattern may allow surgeons to minimize the severity of failure or the need for secondary conversion to hip arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):e376-e380.].

Sliding hip screws versus cancellous screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Both sliding hip screws (SHS) and cancellous screws are used in the surgical management of intracapsular femoral neck fracture. However, there is paucity of information as to which is the superior treatment modality. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis study to compare the clinical outcomes of SHS and cancellous screws for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in adult patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL, up to December 2017. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing the clinical outcomes of SHS and cancellous screws for femoral neck fractures were retrieved with no language or publication year restrictions. Data retrieved included operative details, nonunion rate, avascular necrosis, reoperation, infection and mortality, hip pain, functional hip scores, and medical complications. These were pooled as risk ratio or mean difference (MD) with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed by Chi-square test.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 1934 patients were included in the final analysis. The pooled estimate showed that the SHS group was associated with more intraoperative blood loss (MD = 110.01 ml, 95% CI [52.42, 167.60], p = 0.00002) than the cancellous screws. There was no significant difference in terms of operative time, postoperative hip function, nonunion, avascular necrosis, reoperation rate, infection, fracture healing, hip pain, medical complications, and mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study, the cancellous screws group was associated with less intraoperative blood loss in comparison with the SHS group. No other significant differences were found between the two interventions.

Reduction Techniques for Young Femoral Neck Fractures

Young femoral neck fractures remain challenging fractures to treat. Reduction has repeatedly been shown to be the single most important determinant of patient outcome, and treating surgeons should do all they can to achieve anatomic reduction because this is an outcome variable within the surgeon's control. Whether an open or closed reduction is performed, we hope to provide the reader with reduction strategies when faced with this difficult fracture pattern. In addition, we hope to review indications and techniques for using the various treatment implants/modalities that are currently available as they pertain to reduction and fixation.

Technologies for Young Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation

Fixation of young femoral neck fractures represents a challenge in the field of orthopaedic trauma surgery. Conventional methods, including cannulated screw and sliding hip screw constructs, have been studied and found to have similar results with regards to patient outcomes, which has made choosing an optimum fixation strategy difficult. In all of these cases, quality of reduction has been shown to be the most important factor when it comes to creating a favorable environment for fracture healing. Some of these patients, however, continue to have negative sequelae including nonunion, avascular necrosis, femoral head collapse, and poor hip function as a result. In this article, we review the 2 most commonly used constructs and present 2 novel fixation constructs for the fixation of femoral neck fractures in physiologically young patients, including the Smith & Nephew Conquest system and the Aesculap Targon system. We outline techniques for usage of these systems and proposed advantages to these systems compared with conventional fixation methods. We also discuss the results of previously published studies regarding conventional fixation methods and compare with some limited studies that have been published on these newer technologies.

Threading the Needle: Intrapelvic Displacement of a Femoral Neck Fracture through the Obturator Foramen

Despite timely and appropriate management, displaced femoral neck fractures are often devastating injuries for the young patient. The risk of negative sequelae is further amplified with increasing displacement and vertical fracture patterns. Open anatomic reduction with rigid internal fixation is essential to maximize the healing potential in displaced fractures of the femoral neck. Successful primary osteosynthesis of significantly displaced femoral neck fractures in the young patient has been reported in the literature. We present a unique case of open reduction and internal fixation of a high-energy femoral neck fracture with extrusion of the head through the obturator foramen into the pelvis without associated acetabular or pelvic injury.

Biomechanics-Hot Topics Part I

This study summarizes presentations of a symposium on biomechanically related hot topics of the 2015 Basic Science Focus Forum. Each topic emphasizes a biomechanical challenge common to all 4 of these presentations: an ideal fixation technique should deliver ample stability and sufficient flexibility to prevent fixation failure and to restore normal function.

Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Reoperation rates are high after surgery for hip fractures. We investigated the effect of a sliding hip screw versus cancellous screws on the risk of reoperation and other key outcomes.

METHODS

For this international, multicentre, allocation concealed randomised controlled trial, we enrolled patients aged 50 years or older with a low-energy hip fracture requiring fracture fixation from 81 clinical centres in eight countries. Patients were assigned by minimisation with a centralised computer system to receive a single large-diameter screw with a side-plate (sliding hip screw) or the present standard of care, multiple small-diameter cancellous screws. Surgeons and patients were not blinded but the data analyst, while doing the analyses, remained blinded to treatment groups. The primary outcome was hip reoperation within 24 months after initial surgery to promote fracture healing, relieve pain, treat infection, or improve function. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00761813.

FINDINGS

Between March 3, 2008, and March 31, 2014, we randomly assigned 1108 patients to receive a sliding hip screw (n=557) or cancellous screws (n=551). Reoperations within 24 months did not differ by type of surgical fixation in those included in the primary analysis: 107 (20%) of 542 patients in the sliding hip screw group versus 117 (22%) of 537 patients in the cancellous screws group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·83, 95% CI 0·63-1·09; p=0·18). Avascular necrosis was more common in the sliding hip screw group than in the cancellous screws group (50 patients [9%] vs 28 patients [5%]; HR 1·91, 1·06-3·44; p=0·0319). However, no significant difference was found between the number of medically related adverse events between groups (p=0·82; appendix); these events included pulmonary embolism (two patients [<1%] vs four [1%] patients; p=0·41) and sepsis (seven [1%] vs six [1%]; p=0·79).

INTERPRETATION

In terms of reoperation rates the sliding hip screw shows no advantage, but some groups of patients (smokers and those with displaced or base of neck fractures) might do better with a sliding hip screw than with cancellous screws.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Stichting NutsOhra, Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, Physicians' Services Incorporated.

Clinical results of surgical treatment for femoral neck fractures with the Targon® FN

84 cases (male 15 cases, female 69 cases) of intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with the Targon^® FN (TFN) were available for review. Mean patient age was 74.0 years (range 36-100 years). 55 fractures were undisplaced whereas 29 were displaced. Mean follow-up term was 16.4 months. We surveyed patient mobility before injury and after operation as well as postoperative complications. On a four-stage mobility scale we found 3/55 patients with undisplaced fractures loosing mobility by more than one grade (5.5%), whereas 5/29 (17.2%) displayed this kind of functional decline after displaced fractures. Overall postoperative complication rate was 10.7% (9 cases). These complications included nonunion (1 case), avascular necrosis (7 cases) and peri-implant fracture (1case). Internal fixation with the TFN seems to have an acceptable complication rate in both undisplaced and displaced fractures compared to other recent studies.

Dynamic hip screw fixation versus multiple screw fixation for intracapsular hip fracture

PURPOSE

To compare dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation with multiple screw fixation for intracapsular hip fractures in terms of complications and conversion to hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Records of 52 884 patients aged ≥50 years who underwent internal fixation using a dynamic hip screw (n=18 014, 34.1%) or multiple screws (n=34 870, 65.9%) for intracapsular femoral neck fracture from September 2007 to September 2013 were extracted from the hospital admission database that covers all admissions to the National Health Service hospitals in England using the ICD-10 and OPCS-4 codes. Gender, age, and Charlson comorbidity score of each patient were recorded, as were complications at specific time intervals and revision to hemiarthroplasty or THA at one and 4 years.

RESULTS

Compared with DHS fixation, multiple screw fixation resulted in shorter hospital stay (15 vs. 13 days, p<0.001) and lower rates of 30-day myocardial infarction (2% vs. 1.5%, p=0.022), 30-day lower respiratory tract infection (12.4% vs. 10.6%, p=0.001), 90-day mortality (10.4% vs. 8.6%, p=0.001), and avascular necrosis (0.1% vs. 0.06%, p=0.032), but a higher rate of conversion to hemiarthroplasty or THA at one or 4 years (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Multiple screw fixation for intracapsular hip fracture was associated with a higher conversion rate to hemiarthroplasty or THA at one and 4 years, compared with DHS fixation.

Comparative study of multiple cancellous screws versus sliding hip screws in femoral neck fractures of young adults

PURPOSE

Both cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) and sliding hip screw (SHS) are used in femoral neck fracture fixations, but which is superior is yet to be determined. This study was aimed to compare the clinicoradiological outcome of femoral neck fracture treated with SHS or CCS in young adults.

METHODS

Adults (16e60 years) with femoral neck fracture were divided into Group 1 fixed with SHS and Group 2 fixed with three CCS after closed reduction. Pain relief, functional recovery and postoperative radiographs at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and then yearly for upto 4 years were analyzed.

RESULTS

Group 1 (n=40) achieved radiological union at mean of 7.6 months, with the union rate of 87.5% (n=35), avascular necrosis (AVN) rate of 7.5% (n=3) and mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) of 86.15 at the end of 4 years. In Group 2 (n=45) these parameters were union at 7.1 months, union rate of 82.22% (n=37), AVN rate of 6.67% (n=3) and HHS of 88.65. Comparative results were statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in clinicoradiological outcome between the two implants.

The Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) Identifies Radiographic Nonunion of Femoral Neck Fractures

BACKGROUND

The Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) is a previously validated outcome instrument designed to improve intra- and interobserver reliability when describing the radiographic healing of femoral neck fractures. The ability to identify fractures that have not healed is important for defining nonunion in clinical trials and predicting patients who will likely require additional surgery to promote fracture healing. We sought to investigate the utility of the RUSH score to define femoral neck fracture nonunion.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What RUSH score threshold yields at least 98% specificity to diagnose nonunion at 6 months postinjury? (2) Using the threshold identified, are patients below this threshold at greater risk of reoperation for nonunion and for other indications?

METHODS

A representative sample of 250 out of a cohort of 725 patients with adequate 6-month hip radiographs was analyzed from a multinational elderly hip fracture trial (FAITH). All patients had a femoral neck fracture and were treated with either multiple cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw. Two reviewers independently determined the RUSH score based on the 6-month postinjury radiographs and interrater reliability was assessed with the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). There was substantial reliability between the reviewers assigning the RUSH scores (ICC, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.85). The RUSH score is a checklist-based system that quantifies four measures of healing: cortical bridging, cortical fracture disappearance, trabecular consolidation, and trabecular fracture disappearance.. Fracture healing was determined by two independent methods: (1) concurrently by the treating surgeon using both clinical and radiographic assessments as per routine clinical care; and (2) retrospectively by a Central Adjudication Committee using complete obliteration of the fracture line on radiographs alone. Receiver operating characteristic tables were used to define a RUSH threshold score that was > 98% specific for fracture nonunion.

RESULTS

A threshold score of < 18 was associated with a 100% specificity (95% CI, 97%-100%) and a positive predictive value of 100% (95% CI, 73%-100%) for radiographic nonunion. In contrast, using the fracture healing assessments of the treating surgeons failed to identify a useful discriminatory nonunion threshold and the highest positive predictive value was 43%. With respect to complications, patients with RUSH scores below 18 had greater risk of undergoing reoperation for nonunion (reoperation when < 18: six of 13 [46%]; reoperation when ≥ 18: 11 of 237 [54%]; relative risk [RR], 9.9 [95% CI, 4.4-22.7]; p < 0.001) and for all indications (reoperation when < 18: eight of 13 [62%]; reoperation when ≥ 18: 54 of 237 [38%]; RR, 2.7 [95% CI, 1.7-4.4]; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The 6-month RUSH score is a reliable method for assessing radiographic healing. Our results highlight the discordance between radiographic determinations and clinician assessments of fracture healing and stress the need for clinical data to be incorporated in research studies evaluating fracture healing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Endosteal Biologic Augmentation for Surgical Fixation of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To report outcomes of a cohort with displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs) treated with a length/angle-stable construct augmented with an endosteal fibular allograft serving as a biologic dowel.

DESIGN

Prospective.

SETTING

Level I Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

The study group consists of 27 patients with isolated FNF surgically treated by a single surgeon.

INTERVENTION

Open reduction of the femoral neck, fixed with a length- and angle-stable construct of 2 fully threaded cannulated screws augmented with an endosteal fibular allograft serving as a biologic dowel.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the fixation construct and the viability of both the femoral head and the fibular allograft, host response to the allograft and osseous union were evaluated using a specialized sequence of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

This construct resulted in high union rates (89%; 24 of 27). Two patients suffered early catastrophic failure and 1 patient developed fracture nonunion, all of wish underwent uneventful conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Three additional patients (11%) had removal of symptomatic implants. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were excellent. Twelve-month MRIs revealed either partial or complete osseous incorporation of 86% the fibular allografts without signs of adverse reaction of the host to the allograft. Femoral head osteonecrosis segments were noted in 76% of patients on MRI; however, radiographically, there were no signs of osteonecrosis or segmental collapse.

CONCLUSIONS

The fibular allograft reconstructs the comminuted femoral neck, and the osteointegration overtime increases the strength of the host bone-graft interface. This added strength seems to provide the stability needed to better preserve the intraoperative reduction, obtain good outcomes, and reduce the complications associated with FNF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Incidence, Magnitude, and Predictors of Shortening in Young Femoral Neck Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To describe the incidence and magnitude of femoral neck fracture shortening in patients age younger than 60 years. Secondarily, to examine predictors of fracture shortening.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Level I trauma centre.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-five patients with a median age of 51 years (interquartile range: 42-56 years) were included. Seventy-one percent were male, 75% were displaced fractures, and 78% were treated with cancellous screws.

INTERVENTION

Internal fixation with multiple cancellous screws or sliding hip screw (SHS) + derotation screw.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Radiographic femoral neck shortening at a minimum of 6 weeks after fixation.

RESULTS

Fifty-four percent of patients had ≥5 mm of femoral neck shortening (22% had between ≥5 and <10 mm and 32% ≥10 mm). Initially, displaced fractures shortened more than undisplaced fractures (mean: 8.1 vs. 2.2 mm, P < 0.001), and fractures treated with SHS + derotation screw shortened more than fractures with cancellous screws alone (10.7 vs. 5.5 mm, P = 0.03). Even when adjusting for initial fracture displacement, fractures treated with SHS + derotation screw shortened an average of 2.2 mm more than fractures treated with screws alone (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of clinically significant shortening in our young femoral neck fracture population was higher than anticipated, and 32% of patients experienced severe shortening of >1 cm. Our findings highlight the need for further research to determine the impact of severe shortening on functional outcome and to determine if implant selection affects fracture shortening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cannulated versus non-cannulated cancellous screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: a synthetic bone biomechanical study

PURPOSE

To compare the compressive strength of cannulated versus non-cannulated cancellous screws for undisplaced femoral neck fractures in synthetic bones.

METHODS

18 synthetic proximal femurs simulating an AO B1 valgus impacted femoral neck fracture in osteoporotic bone were used. The fracture angles were between 55º and 63º (Pauwels grade 2). Fixation was made using 6.5-mm non-cannulated screws (n=6), 6.5-mm cannulated screws (n=6), or 7.3-mm cannulated screws (n=6). A custom-built jig was designed to guide the insertion of the screws in an identical triangular configuration. Screws were tightened by a single operator using a torque-measuring screwdriver. The femoral head was subjected to progressive axial loading at 5 mm/min. The load to failure and displacement were recorded.

RESULTS

The 3 groups did not differ significantly except that the load to failure was higher in the construct with 6.5-mm non-cannulated screws than that with 6.5-mm cannulated screws (1222 N vs 1008 N, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

The compressive strength of a synthetic bone hip fracture model fixed with non-cannulated screws was higher than that of cannulated screws of the same diameter.

The Targon FN system for the management of intracapsular neck of femur fractures: minimum 2-year experience and outcome in an independent hospital

Background

The Targon FN implant was developed in 2007 to treat intracapsular neck of femur fractures. Early results from the design centre have shown good results in terms of fracture complications. We wished to see if these results can be reproduced in an independent institution.

Methods

The records of consecutive patients, treated with this implant between 2008 and 2011 at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, were identified and collected for this study. Operations were performed by all grades of surgeons under supervision as appropriate. These patients went on to have both clinical and radiological assessment for fracture healing and function.

Results

Fifty-one patients were identified with 43 patients available for final follow-up. The average age was 66 years with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. A non-union rate of 0% in the undisplaced fracture group and 1 in 12 (8%) in the displaced fracture group was observed. An avascular necrosis rate of 6% and 8% was observed for undisplaced and displaced fracture types, respectively. No significant change in premorbid to postoperative ambulation was observed and there was no wound complication.

Conclusions

Our study shows similar results with those of the design centre and which are superior to those currently found in the literature for the more traditional fixation methods. It also shows that the promising results with this new implant as seen from the design institutions can be reproduced by all cadres of surgeons in non-specialist practice.

Fixed angle devices versus multiple cancellous screws: what does the evidence tell us?

Complications, including nonunion and avascular necrosis, are relatively common after internal fixation of a femoral neck fracture. Young patients are particularly impacted by these complications as salvage options often result in a suboptimal functional result. The quality of reduction appears to be of primary importance; however, it is unknown whether the choice of internal fixation affects the incidence of complications. In this article, we present the rationale and evidence for available internal fixation options. Current evidence is insufficient to recommend an optimal method of internal fixation, and this review demonstrates the need for high-quality randomised, controlled trials to study this problem.

Fixation using alternative implants for the treatment of hip fractures (FAITH): design and rationale for a multi-centre randomized trial comparing sliding hip screws and cancellous screws on revision surgery rates and quality of life in the treatment of femoral neck fractures

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are a common type of fragility fracture that afflict 293,000 Americans (over 5,000 per week) and 35,000 Canadians (over 670 per week) annually. Despite the large population impact the optimal fixation technique for low energy femoral neck fractures remains controversial. The primary objective of the FAITH study is to assess the impact of cancellous screw fixation versus sliding hip screws on rates of revision surgery at 24 months in individuals with femoral neck fractures. The secondary objective is to determine the impact on health-related quality of life, functional outcomes, health state utilities, fracture healing, mortality and fracture-related adverse events.

METHODS/DESIGN

FAITH is a multi-centre, multi-national randomized controlled trial utilizing minimization to determine patient allocation. Surgeons in North America, Europe, Australia, and Asia will recruit a total of at least 1,000 patients with low-energy femoral neck fractures. Using central randomization, patients will be allocated to receive surgical treatment with cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw. Patient outcomes will be assessed at one week (baseline), 10 weeks, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post initial fixation. We will independently adjudicate revision surgery and complications within 24 months of the initial fixation. Outcome analysis will be performed using a Cox proportional hazards model and likelihood ratio test.

DISCUSSION

This study represents major international efforts to definitively resolve the treatment of low-energy femoral neck fractures. This trial will not only change current Orthopaedic practice, but will also set a benchmark for the conduct of future Orthopaedic trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The FAITH trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT00761813).

Predictors of early failure in young patients with displaced femoral neck fractures

INTRODUCTION

This study compares early failure rates of sliding hip screw (SHS) and cannulated screw (CS) constructs in young patients.

METHODS

Patients <60 years of age, with displaced femoral neck fractures treated with CS or SHS fixation were included. Primary outcome was failure within 6 months.

RESULTS

One patient (3%) with SHS fixation and 6 patients (21%) with CS fixation failed within 6 months (P = 0.04). Regression analysis demonstrated type of fixation (P = 0.005) and reduction quality (P = 0.04) are independent predictors of early failure.

CONCLUSIONS

SHS constructs demonstrate a significantly lower short-term failure rate than CS constructs.

The application of closed reduction internal fixation and iliac bone block grafting in the treatment of acute displaced femoral neck fractures

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the preliminary clinical and radiographic outcomes of acute displaced femoral neck fracture treated by closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) with free iliac bone block grafting with comparison to a routine protocol of CRIF without bone grafting.

Methods

From December 2008 to February 2010, 220 adult patients with acute displaced femoral neck fractures were enrolled in this study. In study group, there were 124 patients (57 males, 67 females) with a mean age of 44.8 years (range, 20-64 years). There were 70 transcervical fractures and 54 subcapital fractures. The patients were treated by CRIF and free iliac bone block grafting. The control group consisted of 96 adult patients (46 males, 50 females) with a mean age of 46.3 years (range, 23-64 years). There were 61 transcervical fractures and 35 subcapital fractures. The patients in control group were treated by CRIF without bone grafting.

Results

In study group, 112 patients were followed up for an average of 27.4 months (range, 24-34 months). All fractures healed within 5 months. However, 10 patients presented AVN of the femoral heads. The mean Harris score was 88.6 (range, 41-100). In control group, 68 patients were followed up for an average of 31.2 months (range, 24-42 months). The rates of AVN of the femoral head and fracture nonunion in control group were 26.5% (18/68) and 16.2% (11/68), respectively, significantly higher than those in study group (both P<0.05). The mean Harris score in control group was 83.8 (41–100), significantly lower than that in study group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Acute displaced femoral neck fractures can be treated by CRIF and free iliac bone block grafting in a minimally invasive manner. This technique can guarantee uneventful fracture healing and significantly reduce the rate of femoral head osteonecrosis.

Radiographic union score for hip substantially improves agreement between surgeons and radiologists

Background

Despite the prominence of hip fractures in orthopedic trauma, the assessment of fracture healing using radiographs remains subjective. The variability in the assessment of fracture healing has important implications for both clinical research and patient care. With little existing literature regarding reliable consensus on hip fracture healing, this study was conducted to determine inter-rater reliability between orthopedic surgeons and radiologists on healing assessments using sequential radiographs in patients with hip fractures. Secondary objectives included evaluating a checklist designed to assess hip fracture healing and determining whether agreement improved when reviewers were aware of the timing of the x-rays in relation to the patients’ surgery.

Methods

A panel of six reviewers (three orthopedic surgeons and three radiologists) independently assessed fracture healing using sequential radiographs from 100 patients with femoral neck fractures and 100 patients with intertrochanteric fractures. During their independent review they also completed a previously developed radiographic checklist (Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH)). Inter and intra-rater reliability scores were calculated. Data from the current study was compared to the findings from a previously conducted study where the same reviewers, unaware of the timing of the x-rays, completed the RUSH score.

Results

The agreement between surgeons and radiologists for fracture healing was moderate for “general impression of fracture healing” in both femoral neck (ICC = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.71) and intertrochanteric fractures (0.50, 95% CI: 0.33-0.62). Using a standardized checklist (RUSH), agreement was almost perfect in both femoral neck (ICC = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82-0.87) and intertrochanteric fractures (0.88, 95% CI: 0.86-0.90). We also found a high degree of correlation between healing and the total RUSH score using a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, there was an area under the curve of 0.993 for femoral neck cases and 0.989 for intertrochanteric cases. Agreement within the radiologist group and within the surgeon group did not significantly differ in our analyses. In all cases, radiographs in which the time from surgery was known resulted in higher agreement scores compared to those from the previous study in which reviewers were unaware of the time the radiograph was obtained.

Conclusions

Agreement in hip fracture radiographic healing may be improved with the use of a standardized checklist and appears highly influenced by the timing of the radiograph. These findings should be considered when evaluating patient outcomes and in clinical studies involving patients with hip fractures. Future research initiatives are required to further evaluate the RUSH checklist.

Proximal femoral fractures: Principles of management and review of literature

The purpose of this study was to review the principles involved in the management of proximal femoral fractures as reported in the literature.

METHODS

A medical literature search in the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane database was undertaken to review strategies and principles in proximal femoral fracture treatment. Randomized control trials and meta analysis were given preference while case reports/small series were rejected.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Early anatomical reduction and surgical fixation remains the best option to reduce the risk of complications like non-union and avascular necrosis in treating fracture neck femurs. Cancellous screws continue to be the preferred treatment for fixation of neck femur fractures in younger population until the benefit of using sliding hip screws is validated by large multicentric studies. In the geriatric age group, early prosthetic replacement brings down the mortality and morbidity associated with neck femur fractures. Sliding hip screw (DHS) is the best available option for stable inter trochanteric fractures. The use of intramedullary nails e.g. PFN is beneficial in treating inter trochanteric fractures with comminution and loss of lateral buttress. Intramedullary implants have been proven to have increased success rates in subtrochanteric fractures and should be preferred over extramedullary plate fixation systems.

Results of cephallomedullary nail fixation for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with a cephalomedullary device.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

Between 2002 and 2008, 18 patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures were treated at our Level I trauma center with a cephalomedullary nail. There were 12 males and six females. Six patients were younger than 60 years of age with a mean age of 63 years (range, 40-88 years). Thirteen fractures were midcervical (Orthopaedic Trauma Association [OTA] 31-B2.2 and B2.3), and five fractures were subcapital (OTA 31-B3). Patients with basicervical fractures (OTA 31-B2.1) and nondisplaced subcapital fractures (OTA 31-B1) were excluded.

INTERVENTION

All patients underwent cephalomedullary nail fixation of their femoral neck fractures under the supervision of fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Postoperative radiographs were evaluated for fracture reduction quality. Clinical follow-up was available on 13 patients with a minimum of 12 months (range, 12-25 months). A radiographic and chart review was done to identify complications and outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven of eight fractures that healed were anatomically reduced. No failures occurred in the six patients younger than 60 years. Fixation failed in five of 13 fractures (38.4%) with varus collapse as the typical failure mode. The mean time to failure in these cases was 3.8 months (range, 1-7 months). Overall, the failure rate for the subcapital fractures was 100% (three of three) and for midcervical 20% (two of 10) with all failures being in patients older than 60 years (71.4%). Osteonecrosis without fixation failure or cutout occurred in one case.

CONCLUSION

Cephalomedullary nail fixation of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures demonstrated mixed results. For younger patients with midcervical fractures that were well reduced, the fixation performed well. Displaced subcapital fractures in patients older than 60 years demonstrated a 100% failure rate. As a result, we cannot advocate cephalomedullary fixation for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures in patients older than 60 years, although in younger patients, these implants may provide an alternative to side-plate based fixation devices.

Poor citation of prior evidence in hip fracture trials

BACKGROUND

Failure to cite prior evidence in the medical literature may result in publication redundancy and inefficient use of research funding. We evaluated trials in which internal fixation was compared with arthroplasty for the treatment of hip fractures in order to determine the extent to which these randomized trials cited all relevant previous trials.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase for all relevant articles on four topics: internal fixation compared with arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty, sliding hip screws compared with other fixation devices, and surgical delay of hip fracture treatment. We determined the proportion of previous studies that were cited in comparison with the total number of previous studies that were citable (i.e., the citation rate) as well as the proportion of times that a study was cited in comparison with the total number of times that it could have been cited (i.e., the hit rate). A cumulative meta-analysis was performed for the "internal fixation compared with arthroplasty" topic to determine whether compelling evidence favoring one intervention existed at an earlier time.

RESULTS

In total, sixty studies were assessed and yielded an overall citation rate of 48%. All "highly cited" studies reported a positive result (favoring arthroplasty), and 60% were published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American or British volume). The results of a study and the journal of publication significantly affected the hit rate (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our review of studies of hip fracture treatment suggests poor citation of the previous literature. Studies in higher-impact journals with positive results are more likely to be cited in subsequent studies. Therefore, redundancy in publication and unnecessary surgical trials often occur.

Evidence summary: systematic review of surgical treatments for geriatric hip fractures

BACKGROUND

There is a growing body of literature on surgical treatments for elderly patients with a hip fracture and the effects of various surgical procedures on complications and postoperative outcomes. No single review has previously summarized the literature on the effects of surgical procedures on outcomes after treatment across all types of hip fractures. We conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review to organize the clinical evidence for patient-centered outcomes across all types of geriatric hip fractures.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scirus, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials and observational studies published between 1985 and 2008. We also manually searched reference lists from relevant systematic reviews.

RESULTS

We found eighty-four [corrected] articles representing seventy-four [corrected] unique, randomized, controlled trials, including thirty-three [corrected] on femoral neck fractures, forty on intertrochanteric fractures, and one on subtrochanteric fractures. Nine observational studies addressed the link between patient characteristics and outcome variables by fracture type. Age, sex, prefracture functioning, and cognitive impairment are related to mortality and functional outcomes. Fracture type does not appear to be independently related to patient outcomes. Mortality, pain, function, and quality of life did not differ by surgical implant class, or by implants within a class. Neither the randomized controlled trials nor the observational literature include the full complement of potential covariates that can impact treatment outcomes after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The broader questions about the relationship of patient factors, fracture type, and specific treatments to the outcomes of mortality, functional status, and quality of life cannot be addressed with the existing literature. Research should include comprehensive conceptual models that capture complete sets of important independent variables. Studies of musculoskeletal outcomes, including hip fracture, require well-defined patient groups and consistent use of validated outcome measures.

Future perspectives: the need for large clinical trials

Fragility fractures represent a growing problem with large economic and patient burdens that are likely to increase as the population ages. The elderly patient with osteopenic bone presents a unique surgical challenge with appreciable risks associated with each surgical treatment option. As demonstrated in this supplement, the current evidence suggests that the best surgical treatment options for patients with fragility fractures remains largely unknown. Additional evidence, from large clinical trials, is required before definitive treatment recommendations can be made in many cases. In this article, we review the example of the femoral neck fracture to illustrate this point.

Displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults treated with closed reduction and internal fixation

This article describes the effect of closed reduction and internal fixation with 3 different screw configurations for acute completely displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults. From 2001 to 2006, 136 patients (age range, 20-50 years) who had acute unilaterally completely displaced femoral neck fractures were evaluated retrospectively. All fractures were managed with closed reduction and internal fixation with 3 cannulated screws. The follow-up period was 55 months on average (range, 36-90 months). One hundred twenty-two patients were available for final evaluation of union condition and late complication. Twenty-three patients (18.9%) had nonunion, 15 (12.3%) had fixation failure, and 21 (17.2%) had avascular necrosis of the femoral head. The average duration from injury to surgery was 18.4 hours in the union group and 23.3 hours in the nonunion group, with no statistical significance (P=.196). The average duration from injury to surgery was 17.3 hours in the avascular necrosis of the femoral head group and 22.3 hours in the non-avascular necrosis of the femoral head group, with no statistical significance (P=.155). Vertical- and separated-type screw configurations resulted in a significantly higher nonunion rate (P=.001 and P=.0017, respectively) than parallel configuration. The complication rate in treating completely displaced femoral neck fractures with internal fixation in young adults is high, and screw configuration may further affect results.

Valgus osteotomy for delayed presentation of femoral neck fractures Pauwels Grade III

Fracture displacement, a high Pauwels angle, and delayed presentation decrease the potential for healing of femoral neck fractures. In the young individual, head preservation is paramount. Valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy may increase the healing potential of femoral neck fractures in the presence of those detrimental factors. Ten patients younger than 60 years of age with delayed presentation of displaced Pauwels III femoral neck fractures were treated by osteosynthesis and valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy fixed by dynamic hip screws. All osteotomies and nine fractures united with one case developing avascular necrosis.

Optimal internal fixation for femoral neck fractures: multiple screws or sliding hip screws?

INTRODUCTION

The number of hip fractures is likely to exceed 500,000 in the United States and 88,000 in Canada annually over the next 40 years. Hip fractures are associated with a 30% mortality rate at 1 year and profound temporary, and sometimes permanent, impairment of independence and quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

Although much focus has centered around the comparison of arthroplasty versus internal fixation devices in the treatment of femoral neck fractures, the optimal approach for internal fixation has been largely ignored. Identifying the optimal technique for internal fixation could reduce the historically high rates of revision surgery that have fueled arguments against fixing patients with displaced femoral neck fractures.

RESULTS

Both indirect and direct comparisons suggest a possible benefit for a sliding hip screw over multiple cancellous screws in reducing the need for revision surgery. The indirect nature of the comparison from the meta-analysis of arthroplasty versus internal fixation, and the small sample sizes, methodological limitations, and nonsignificant pooled estimate from the direct comparisons, leaves the issue very much in doubt.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the rationale for arthroplasty continues to gain popularity, previous studies suggest that we have yet to identify the best approach for internal fixation. Previous trials suggest that the issue is largely unresolved and solutions will likely come from larger randomized trials comparing alternative devices for fixing the hip.

The dynamic locking blade plate, a new implant for intracapsular hip fractures: biomechanical comparison with the sliding hip screw and Twin Hook

Internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures results in a high failure rate with non-union and avascular necrosis being the two most important complications. In order to prevent these possible complications treatment should consist of an anatomical reduction and stable fixation by insertion of a low volume, dynamic implant, providing angular and rotational stability to the femoral head. According to these principles a new implant, the dynamic locking blade plate (DLBP) was designed for the fixation of intracapsular hip fractures. We performed a biomechanical analysis in synthetic bone to compare the rotational stability and cut out resistance of the DLBP with a conventional sliding hip screw (SHS) and the more recently developed Twin Hook. The rotational stability of the DLBP proved to be three times higher than the rotational stability of a SHS and two times higher than the Twin Hook. There was no major difference in cut out resistance between the different implants. The design of the DLBP and possible advantages with regard to the healing of an intracapsular hip fracture are discussed.

Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures

During the past 10 years, there has been a worldwide effort in all medical fields to base clinical health care decisions on available evidence as described by thorough reviews of the literature. Hip fractures pose a significant health care problem worldwide, with an annual incidence of approximately 1.7 million. Globally, the mean age of the population is increasing, and the number of hip fractures is expected to triple in the next 50 years. One-year mortality rates currently range from 14% to 36%, and care for these patients represents a major global economic burden. Surgical options for the management of femoral neck fractures are closely linked to individual patient factors and to the location and degree of fracture displacement. Nonsurgical management of intracapsular hip fractures is limited. Based on a critical, evidence-based review of the current literature, we have found minimal differences between implants used for internal fixation of displaced fractures. Cemented, unipolar hemiarthroplasty remains a good option with reasonable results. In the appropriate patient population, outcomes following total hip arthroplasty are favorable and appear to be superior to those of internal fixation.

Osteosynthesis for a T-shaped fracture of the femoral neck and trochanter: a case report

Ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck and trochanter are uncommon. We report a 30-year-old man with a T-shaped fracture separating the trochanter and neck from the head. He underwent osteosynthesis using a dynamic compression plate, screws, and pins. Bone union occurred 4 months postoperatively. At the one-year follow-up, the patient was free of pain and had no evidence of avascular necrosis. It is important to preserve the femoral head in young patients by preventing further compromise of the tenuous blood supply.