Supporting the health of trans patients in the context of Australian general practice

Improving the forensic genital examination for trans and gender diverse sexual assault complainants: three case reports

Trans and gender diverse people experience high rates of sexual violence and significant barriers to healthcare, including post-sexual assault healthcare. These barriers could lead to delays in presentations to sexual assault services and a reluctance to having forensic examinations, thereby impacting genital injury assessment and evidence collection. It is therefore important that clinicians working in sexual assault services understand how to best undertake forensic genital examinations, collect forensic genital specimens, and identify and document genital injuries in this population. This case report discusses three trans and gender diverse complainants of sexual assault seen at the Sexual Assault Resource Centre in Western Australia. These cases, along with an accompanying review of the literature, have been used to change the centre's practice towards this community to improve forensic genital examinations. This has included creating specific trans and gender diverse medical and forensic notes, improving clinician knowledge around trans and gender diverse genital examinations and genital injury profiles, creating an inclusive physical environment, improving trans and gender diverse patient knowledge around sexual assault services, and providing options for genital specimen collection.

The influence of care continuity and disclosure of sexual orientation in general practice on lesbian, bi+ and queer cisgender women's engagement with mental health services

BACKGROUND

Lesbian, bisexual+ and queer (LBQ+) cisgender women have considerable unmet mental health needs. The aims of this study were to examine LBQ+ cisgender women's prior engagement with general practitioners (GPs), and how this relationship shaped their mental health service use.

METHOD

Data from 2707 cisgender LBQ+ women were drawn from a national survey of adults who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, queer or questioning, asexual and other diverse sexuality and gender identities (LGBTIQA+) in Australia. Multivariable logistic regression analyses examined demographic predictors of continuity of care with GPs and GPs' awareness of LBQ+ women's sexual orientation. The relationship between these variables and recent mental health service use was then analysed, comparing LBQ+ women's engagement with services known to be LGBTIQA+ inclusive and those without an inclusive reputation.

RESULTS

LBQ+ cisgender women with a regular GP had greater odds of having accessed mental health services in the last 12months. Two-thirds had a regular GP, with the lowest odds among women aged 18-35years and highest odds among women with a disability. LBQ+ women who did not believe their regular GP knew of their sexuality had lower odds of having accessed LGBTIQA+ inclusive mental health services. These individuals were typically aged below 25years, bisexual+ or queer identified, had below undergraduate-level education, earned <$2000 AUD per week, or lived in an outer-suburban or regional area.

CONCLUSION

GPs may be missing opportunities to promote continuity of care through developing trusting relationships with specific sub-populations of LBQ+ women, which in turn appears to sustain inequitable access to mental health care. To offer appropriate care and referrals for this population, GPs should provide safe and inclusive environments to enable comfortable and supportive discussions about sexual orientation when this is relevant to a person's health care.

Fostering Gender-IQ: Barriers and Enablers to Gender-affirming Behavior Amongst an Australian General Practitioner Cohort

While the visible population of trans and gender diverse Australians has grown significantly in recent years, primary health-care access remains hindered by a lack of practitioner competency and stigmatization. This article draws on qualitative research of purposively selected gender-affirming general practitioners (GPs) in Australia to explore barriers, and enablers when treating trans and gender diverse patients. Perspectives and behaviors during the gender-affirming clinical encounter were theoretically informed through minority stress theory, and master narrative frameworks. Reflexive thematic analysis facilitated a rich description of exemplary gender-affirming primary care. A considerable gap exists between structural, clinical, and cultural behaviors among competent gender-affirming GPs in Australia, and the majority of practitioners evidenced in the literature. This critical analysis contributes to better understanding how gender-affirming Australian GPs diffuse minority stress, negotiate cis-normative biases, and foster a person-centered longitudinal therapeutic relationship with their trans and gender diverse patients. An encounter the article argues may also provide an essential buffer for GPs in Australia against the risk of professional burnout. Gender-affirming practice should be taught as a core competency and be required as professional development for GPs in Australia, to ensure a beneficial clinical encounter for the growing trans and gender diverse population.

Accessing and utilising gender-affirming healthcare in England and Wales: trans and non-binary people's accounts of navigating gender identity clinics

BACKGROUND

Transgender, or trans, people experience a number of barriers to accessing gender-affirming healthcare and have a range of barriers and facilitators to primary care and specialist services, commonly citing discrimination and cisgenderism playing a central role in shaping accessibility. The pathway through primary care to specialist services is a particularly precarious time for trans people, and misinformation and poorly applied protocols can have a detrimental impact on wellbeing.

METHOD

We recruited trans participants from an HIV Self-Testing Public Health Intervention (SELPHI) trial to interviews which explored contemporary gender-affirming service experiences, with an aim to examine the path from primary care services through to specialist gender services, in the UK.

RESULTS

A narrative synthesis of vignettes and thematic analysis of in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with twenty trans individuals. We summarise positive and negative accounts of care under three broad categories: Experiences with primary care physicians, referrals to gender identity clinics (GICs), and experiences at GICs.

CONCLUSIONS

We discuss implications of this research in terms of how to improve best practice for trans people attempting to access gender-affirming healthcare in the UK. Here we highlight the importance of GP's access to knowledge around pathways and protocols and clinical practice which treats trans patients holistically.

Perspectives of trans and gender diverse young people accessing primary care and gender-affirming medical services: Findings from Trans Pathways

Background: Increasing numbers of trans young people are seeking medical services worldwide, but there have been few qualitative investigations of the experiences of trans young people attempting to engage with these services to explore in-depth experiences of clinical interactions. Aims: We aimed to explore the experiences of trans young people accessing primary care and gender-affirming medical services in Australia for reasons related to their gender. Methods: Using data from a large mixed methods cross-sectional study, we explored the personal experiences of trans young people aged 14-25 (N = 859) receiving care within primary care services and gender-affirming medical services. Qualitative data on these service experiences were thematically analyzed. Results: Trans young people in Australia reported experiencing difficulties when accessing medical services, especially in relation to gender-affirming medical intervention, referrals to specialist services, and obtaining clinical support in an affordable and timely manner. We found that trans young people were frequently confronted with negative experiences due to clinicians lacking expertise in providing gender-affirming care. Trans young people also reported many positive experiences, including feeling their gender identity was valued and respected by certain services. Although many practitioners attempted to assist their trans patients, they often did not provide satisfactory care and young people were often left to navigate the health care system unsupported. These interactions were often constrained by long waiting times and service cost. Discussion: In general, clinicians require further training to be able to respectfully interact with trans patients and to adequately assist trans young people to obtain necessary medical care. The danger of providing such non-affirmative care to a trans young person is not only invalidating the young person's identity, but also an elevated risk of ill-health due to later avoidance of health care.