Outcome of modified Kidner procedure with subtalar arthroereisis for painful accessory navicular associated with planovalgus deformity

Clinical outcomes of subtalar arthroereisis for the treatment of stage 1 flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity

BACKGROUND

The use of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct to the surgical treatment of stage 1 flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is controversial. The aim was to investigate the clinical outcomes and report the implant removal rate of subtalar arthroereisis as an adjunct for stage 1 PCFD.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 212 consecutive feet undergoing operative management of stage 1 PCFD with adjunctive subtalar arthroereisis between October 2010 and April 2018. The primary outcome was the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Secondary outcomes included Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), Euroqol-5D-5L Index and implant removal rate.

RESULTS

Post-operative clinical FAOS outcomes were collected for 153 feet (72.2%). At mean 2.5-year follow-up, the mean ± standard deviation FAOS for each domain was as follows; Pain: 81.5 ± 18.5, Symptoms: 79.5 ± 12.9, Activities of Daily Living: 82.5 ± 15.4 and Quality of Life: 64.2 ± 23.7. EQ-5D-5L Index was 0.884 ± 0.152. Pre-operative scores were available for 20 of these feet demonstrating a statistically significant improvement in all FAOS, FADI and EQ-5D-5L domains (p < 0.05). The implant removal rate for persistent sinus tarsi pain was 48.1% (n = 102).

CONCLUSION

Use of a subtalar arthroereisis implant as an adjunct to conventional procedures in stage 1 flexible PCFD can result in significant improvement in pain and function. Patients should be counselled as to the relatively frequent rate of subsequent implant removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Accessory navicular in children

Accessory navicular (AN) is a developmental variation of the secondary ossification center of the navicular tuberosity. Ten percent of patients with AN will have pain symptoms that affect walking and life. As the AN changes the position of the posterior tibial tendon insertion, children with AN often have posterior tibial tendon function insufficiency and flexible flat foot. Surgical treatment is often required after failure of conservative treatment. This article reviewed the etiology, clinical manifestations, complications, and treatment methods of AN.

A modified method for reconstruction of posterior tibial tendon after resection of juvenile painful type II accessory navicular

BACKGROUND

The surgical treatment of accessory navicular (AN) is divided into simple resection of AN and Kidner surgery used to reconstruct posterior tibial tendon (PTT) after AN resection. However, both of these procedures have certain disadvantages. Herein, we proposed a modified method to reconstruct PTT and compared the short-term clinical effect of our method with the modified Kidner procedure.

METHODS

We collected data from 23 adolescent children with painful type II AN treated in our department between January 2015 and June 2020. The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hind foot (AOFAS-AH) Scores, the Meary Angle, and Pitch Angle of the lateral weight-bearing plain radiographs status were recorded before and after the operation to evaluate the treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

In the modified Kidner surgery (MK) group, the median AOFAS-AH increased from 61 (59-68) to 87 (83-91) (P < 0.05); the Pitch angle of the lateral weight-bearing plain radiographs increased from 13.0 (8-18) to 17.4 (14-22), and the Meary angle decreased from 18.3 (14-24) to 14.2 (8-20) (P < 0.05). In the PTT preservation folded suture (FS) group, the median AOFAS-AH increased from 61 (59-68) to 87 (85-91) (P < 0.05); the Pitch angle of the lateral weight-bearing plain radiographs increased from 12.3 (7-18) to 18.4 (15-26), and the Meary angle decreased from 17.8 (13-23) to 5.7 (3-8) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in AOFAS-AH postoperative scores between the FS group and MK group; however, the improvement on Pitch and Meary angle of the lateral weight-bearing plain radiographs was significantly better in the FS group than in MK group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For painful type II AN in juvenile patients, the insertion-preserving folding suture procedure had similar short-term results on AOFAS-AH scores but greater improvement in the Meary angle and the Pitch Angle than the modified Kidner method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Subtalar arthroereisis post-operative management in children: A literature review

PURPOSE

Subtalar arthroereisis is a minimally-invasive technique for the treatment of flexible flatfoot. Some issues regarding the procedure are still debated, such as post-operative management. The aim of this study is to offer a review of the pertaining literature to identify current post-operative protocols and describe possible differences among them.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for all papers related to subtalar arthroereisis in children specifying the post-operative protocols. After reviewing all studies according to excluding criteria, 50 articles were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Based on the literature review, different post-operative protocols emerged in the treatment of patients undergoing subtalar arthroereisis, in particular regarding length of hospital stay, type and duration of immobilization, weight-bearing management, adopted rehabilitation scheme, sport resumption and implant removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important finding was the existence of a wide variety in post-operative management after subtalar arthroereisis in children, thus confirming that no clear consensus still exists in this field.

Is Kidner procedure necessary during subtalar arthroereisis for pediatric flexible flatfoot that combined with symptomatic type 2 accessory navicular? A retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Kidner procedure is thought to be able to eliminate the medial foot pain and contribute to restoring the medial longitudinal foot arch, making it particularly suitable for surgical treatment of pes planus that combined with symptomatic type 2 accessory navicular (AN). However, controversy remains, and the clinical evidence is still lacking. The aim of the current study is to verify the necessity of Kidner procedure during subtalar arthroereisis (STA) for pediatric flexible flatfoot (PFF) that combined with symptomatic type 2 AN.

METHODS

Forty pediatric patients (72 feet) who had undergone STA for flexible flatfoot and were also diagnosed with symptomatic type 2 AN concomitantly were reviewed retrospectively and divided into two groups (STA + Kidner vs STA alone). The visual analog scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, the Oxford ankle foot questionnaire for children (OAFQC), and the radiographic parameters that quantifying pes planus were evaluated as primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of complications.

RESULTS

There were 35 feet in the STA + Kidner group and 37 feet in the STA alone group, with mean follow-up periods of 2.7 years and 2.1 years, respectively. The VAS, AOFAS, OAFQC scores and radiographic parameters presented no significant difference between the two groups both preoperatively and at final follow-up (P > 0.05 for each). The complications of STA surgery occurred equally in both groups, and Kidner procedure could lead to more incision problems (22.9% vs. 2.7%) and a longer time to return to activity.

CONCLUSION

Kidner procedure may be unnecessary during surgical treatment of PFF that combined with painful type 2 AN. Correcting the PFF while leaving the AN alone has a high possibility of relieving the pain in the AN region, and tibialis posterior tendon (TPT) rerouting hardly aids in reconstruction of the medial foot arch.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Clinical Outcomes of Fusion in Type II Accessory Naviculars With or Without Asymptomatic Flatfeet

BACKGROUND

Few studies have reported the clinical outcomes of fusion surgeries for type II accessory naviculars. Whether the combination of accessory naviculars and asymptomatic flatfoot will result in worse outcomes in accessory navicular surgeries remains to be elucidated. Our study aims to report the clinical outcomes of fusion for type II accessory naviculars and make a subgroup comparison among accessory navicular patients with or without asymptomatic flatfeet.

METHODS

From May 2017 to June 2021, all painful type II accessory naviculars with or without asymptomatic flatfeet in our inpatient center were reviewed, and those who only underwent fusion surgeries were included in the retrospective study. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scores, Tegner activity level scores, complications, patient-reported satisfaction, and imaging results (Meary angle in the weightbearing lateral view, talo-first metatarsal angle and talonavicular coverage angle in the weightbearing anteroposterior view) were used to describe outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-two eligible patients responded to the latest follow-up request and were included in this study. The mean follow-up duration was 37.1 ± 16.0 months. The average VAS pain score improved from 4.7 ± 1.8 preoperatively to 0.9 ± 1.2 at the latest follow-up (P<.001). The average AOFAS midfoot score improved from 67.1 ± 8.5 preoperatively to 90.2 ± 10.7 at the latest follow-up (P<.001). The preoperative and postoperative Tegner activity level scores were similar (3.3 ± 1.5 vs 3.5 ± 1.6, P=.136). The overall complication rate was 37.5%. The most common complication was nonunion (31.3%). The overall satisfaction rate was 90.6%. Similar outcomes were observed between the flatfoot and the nonflatfoot subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Fusion for painful type II accessory naviculars resulted in good symptom relief, function improvement, and patient satisfaction at midterm follow-up, but the nonunion rate was relatively high. Fusion for painful type II accessory naviculars with or without asymptomatic mild to moderate flatfoot brought about similar clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Subtalar arthroereisis combined with medial soft tissue reconstruction in treating pediatric flexible flatfoot with accessory navicular

PURPOSE

Accessory navicular is accompanied by the deformity of valgus flexible flatfoot. The surgical treatment includes reconstruction of insertion of posterior tibial tendon following resection of the accessory navicular. However, this treatment could not correct completely the deformity of valgus flexible flatfoot. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of subtalar arthroereisis combined with medial soft tissue reconstruction in treating 8-14-year-old flexible flatfoot patients with accessory navicular.

METHODS

Clinical data of 35 pediatric flatfoot patients (with 50 feet) with accessory navicular who underwent subtalar arthroereisis and medial soft tissue reconstruction between April 2013 and September 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Anteroposterior, lateral, and hindfoot alignment radiological images were measured in the weight-bearing position, and visual analog scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale, and satisfaction degree were evaluated. Also, surgical complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time of the patients was 30 ± 9.3 months. None of the patients presented wound complications, and no implant loosening was detected. The AOFAS and VAS scores improved significantly (P < 0.001). Radiological parameters, such as the talar first metatarsal angle and talonavicular coverage angle on anteroposterior foot view, Meary's angle and calcaneal pitch angle on the lateral view, and calcaneus valgus angle on hindfoot alignment view improved significantly (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications were observed in three patients.

CONCLUSION

Subtalar arthroereisis combined with medial soft tissue reconstruction significantly alleviated pain and improved the functions in pediatric and adolescent flexible flatfoot patients with accessory navicular; also, the radiological manifestations and functions improved.

Subtalar Arthroereisis for Surgical Treatment of Flexible Flatfoot

Various surgical techniques are known for the treatment of flexible flatfoot in children after failure of nonsurgical attempts. Data collected in a review of the last 10-year period (2010-2020) show that among the 691 feet undergoing subtalar arthroereisis with endorthesis, average age at surgery was 11.40 years and in the 1856 feet that underwent subtalar arthroereisis with calcaneo-stop 11.69 years, while the complications rate was 9.00% and 6.38%, respectively. These data confirm that subtalar arthroereisis with calcaneo-stop may have an advantage over subtalar arthroereisis with endorthesis as the screw is not placed across the subtalar joint but instead into the calcaneus.

Biomechanical assessment of two types and two different locations of subtalar arthroereisis implants for flexible flatfoot: A cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Subtalar arthroereisis refers to the implantation of a sinus tarsi implant for the treatment of flexible flatfoot. The purpose of this study was to compare the ability to correct the flatfoot deformity and contact pressure of the posterior subtalar joint between two types of self-locking wedge implants and between two different positions for the same device in a cadaveric flatfoot model.

METHODS

The flatfoot model was created in ten cadaver feet through ligament sectioning and cyclic loading. Three kinds of arthroereisis procedures were evaluated: Talar-Fit (type I self-locking wedge implant) anchored in the sinus portion of the tarsal sinus (T-sinus group), Talar-Fit in the canalis portion (T-canalis group), and HyProCure (type II) in the canalis portion (H group). Corrective ability in the sagittal and transverse planes were measured with clinometers. Contact pressure was measured with pressure-sensitive films.

FINDINGS

T-canalis group provided more sagittal (mean difference for size 10 mm: 1.9°, P = 0.014; mean difference for size 11 mm: 3.1°, P = 0.037) and transverse (mean difference for size 8 mm: 1.8°, P = 0.049; mean difference for size 11 mm: 2.2°, P = 0.049) corrections than T-sinus group. The flattening process shifted the peak pressure of the posterior subtalar joint to the posteromedial side (P < 0.05) and arthroereisis helped the distribution of contact pressure restore uniformity (all P > 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

A self-locking wedge implant inserted in the canalis portion of the tarsal sinus achieved better correction than an implant inserted in the sinus portion.

Flexible Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity: Is There Any Role for Arthroereisis in the Adult Patient?

Over the last two decades there is a growing interest in the adult literature for subtalar joint arthroereisis. Parallel to this interest, there have been improvements in the design and biomechanics of the implant, although the main indication of subtalar joint arthroereisis in adults is not clear. Most studies show significant improvement in postoperative clinical scores and visual analog scores. Sinus tarsi pain, being the most common complication, is the main determinant of clinical satisfaction. This review focuses on the role and complications of subtalar joint arthroereisis in the adult population.

Lateral column osteotomy versus subtalar arthroereisis in the correction of Grade IIB adult acquired flatfoot deformity: A clinical and radiological follow-up at 24 months

BACKGROUND

Adult acquired flat foot deformity (AAFD) is a spectrum of conditions which can be progressive if untreated. Surgical correction and restoration of anatomical relationship are often required in the treatment of symptomatic Grade II AAFD after a failed course of conservative treatment. There is a paucity of literature recommending best practice-especially in the adult population. The authors aim to compare radiological and clinical outcomes of two widely employed surgical techniques in the treatment of symptomatic AAFD.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 76 patients with Grade IIB AAFD and had undergone either lateral column lengthening (LCL) or subtalar arthroereisis (STA) surgical correction of their symptomatic AAFD. Each technique was augmented with both bony osteotomy and soft tissue transfer as determined by on table assessment. Clinical and radiological outcomes were reviewed 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

LCL and STA groups had comparable radiological outcomes at 24 months after surgery. However, LCL group demonstrated superior American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot (90.3 ± 12.6 vs 81.1 ± 20.6, p < 0.001) as well as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) midfoot scores (0.5 ± 1.6 vs 1.3 ± 2.4, p < 0.001) at 24 months compared to the STA group. STA had a higher complication rate (20.6% vs 4.4%), with all cases complaining of sinus tarsi pain requiring subsequent removal of implant.

CONCLUSION

There is a role for either techniques in the treatment of symptomatic AAFD. LCL whilst more invasive has demonstrated superior outcome scores and lower complication rates at 24 months compared to STA. Patients need to be counselled appropriately to appreciate the benefits of each technique.

Evaluation and Management of Common Accessory Ossicles of the Foot and Ankle in Children and Adolescents

Accessory ossicles are a common radiographic finding about the foot and ankle in children and adolescents. They are often noted incidentally during evaluation of foot and ankle injuries, and most can be managed nonsurgically. Although over 20 accessory ossicles have been described around the foot and ankle, five specific structures generate the most concern in pediatric patients. An accessory navicular presents commonly with medial midfoot pain and may require surgical intervention after failure of nonsurgical treatment. Although an accessory navicular can be treated surgically with simple excision, there is some recent evidence that supports concomitant reconstruction of associated flatfoot deformities. Os trigonum, an ossicle posterior to the talus, is also commonly asymptomatic. However, os trigonum may be associated with persistent posterior ankle pain, and open and endoscopic resection techniques are successful. Os subfibulare is an uncommon ossicle that may be associated with recurrent ankle sprains. Recent literature reports successful return to activities after ossicle excision and ligament reconstruction. Os subtibiale may be confused with a medial malleolar fracture in skeletally immature patients. Os peroneum may contribute to lateral midfoot pain.

Treatment for Flexible Flatfoot in Children With Subtalar Arthroereisis and Soft Tissue Procedures

Background: Children with flexible flatfoot is common in clinics and there is no unified conclusion on surgical treatment. And for some patients with severe deformities, the correction of the subtalar joint arthroereisis combine the release of the Achilles tendon or gastrocnemius muscle release is still not satisfactory. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the therapeutic outcomes of subtalar arthroereisis combined with Achilles tendon or gastrocnemius recession and medial soft tissue (spring ligament, talonavicular joint capsule, tibionavicular ligaments and tibiospring ligaments) tightening for treating flexible flatfoot with severe deformities. Methods: Thirty patients (32 feet) with pediatric flexible flatfoot who underwent subtalar arthroereisis and soft tissue procedures during January 2016 to January 2018. There were 18 males (20 feet) and 12 females (12 feet) with an average age of 9.5 years (range, 8-12 years). We used the AOFAS scores and VAS scores combined with angles measure to evaluate the pre-operative and post-operative status. Results: Thirty patients (32 feet) were followed up for 25.3 months on average (range, 18-36 months). There was no infection. Post-operative foot pain, arch collapse, and other symptoms improved. At last follow-up, the Meary angle was decreased from 17.5° ± 4.4° to 4.1° ± 1.2° (P < 0.05), the talar-first metatarsal (AP) was decreased from 15.3° ± 3.1° to 4.8° ± 1.3°(P < 0.05), The mean AOFAS score was rose from 66.6 ± 5.8 to 88.6 ± 7.9 (P < 0.05), the mean VAS score was decreased from 6.6 ± 0.6 to 1.7 ± 0.3 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The subtalar arthroereisis combined with soft tissue procedures can effectively correct flexible flatfoot in children and it is a significant method for severe forefoot abduction reconstruction. Level of Evidence: IV.

Mid-term Results of Subtalar Arthroereisis with Talar-Fit Implant in Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot and Identifying the Effects of Adjunctive Procedures and Risk Factors for Sinus Tarsi Pain

Objectives

To (i) report the mid‐term outcomes of subtalar arthroereisis using Talar‐Fit implant for the treatment of flexible flatfoot patients; (ii) compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between arthroereisis with and without adjunctive operative procedures to investigate the effects of adjuncts on the outcomes; and (iii) analyze the risk factors associated with sinus tarsi pain, which is the most common postoperative complication of arthroereisis.

Methods

Thirty‐one flexible flatfoot children and adolescents (46 feet) treated with subtalar arthroereisis using Talar‐Fit implant from June 2014 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The feet were divided into four treatment groups: (i) arthroereisis alone, (ii) arthroereisis with gastrocnemius recession, (iii) arthroereisis with Kidner procedure, and (iv) arthroereisis with gastrocnemius recession and Kidner procedure. Clinical function was evaluated based on the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score. The following angles were measured for radiographic evaluation: talar‐first metatarsal angle, calcaneal pitch angle, and talar declination angle on the lateral view; and talar‐first metatarsal angle, talocalcaneal angle, and anteroposterior talonavicular coverage angle on the anteroposterior (AP) view. The paired Student's t‐test was used to compare the pre‐ and postoperative angular measurements and AOFAS scores. The Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was undertaken to determine the outcome differences among four treatment groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors for sinus tarsi pain. P value <0.05 is considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean follow‐up of the feet was 32.8 months (range, 10–71 months). The mean AOFAS score significantly improved from 55.5 ± 14.5 preoperatively to 86.3 ± 9.9 (P < 0.001). Comparison of radiographic outcomes showed that the lateral talar‐first metatarsal angle decreased by a mean of 19.1° ± 11.9° (P < 0.001), the calcaneal pitch angle increased by a mean of 5.4° ± 3.4° (P < 0.001), the talar declination angle decreased by a mean of 14.8° ± 9.9° (P < 0.001), the AP talar‐first metatarsal angle decreased by a mean of 15.6° ± 10.3° (P < 0.001), the AP talocalcaneal angle decreased by a mean of 7.2° ± 8.3° (P = 0.001), and the AP talonavicular coverage angle decreased by a mean of 20.4° ± 9.0° (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences with regard to AOFAS score and all angle measurements on both the AP and lateral views among the four treatment groups. There was one dislocation case caused by a fall 6 weeks after surgery, which was treated nonoperatively. The incidence of sinus tarsi pain was 13% and logistic regression analysis indicated that patients with a longer distance from the tail end of the implant to the lateral calcaneal wall had 38.8% greater odds of developing sinus tarsi pain.

Conclusions

The mid‐term clinical and radiographic results were satisfactory in patients who underwent the subtalar arthroereisis procedure using Talar‐Fit implant, alone or in combination with other adjuncts, for the treatment of flexible flatfoot.

Outcomes Following Revision Surgery After Failed Kidner Procedure for Painful Accessory Navicular

BACKGROUND

The Kidner procedure is performed to treat painful accessory navicular syndrome, with varying results. Recurrent pain remains a complication, and to date, there is a paucity of literature regarding the causes of recurrent pain and surgical outcomes of revision.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients who underwent revision surgery for recurrent pain after the Kidner procedure were identified. All patients had their tendon inspected and treated, and all had a medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy. Revision was indicated after 6 months of failed conservative therapy. Pre- and postrevision radiographic measurements included lateral talo-first metatarsal angle (Meary's angle), talonavicular coverage angle, calcaneal pitch, and hindfoot moment arm (HMA). Meary's angle >4 degrees was considered a planus deformity and HMA >9.1 mm was considered a hindfoot valgus deformity; patients fulfilling both criteria were categorized as having planovalgus deformity. Measurements in the contralateral foot were performed to determine whether alignment of the involved side was attributed to failed treatment or a preexisting deformity. Visual analog scale and Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores were compared and average follow-up was 20.1 months (range, 14-26).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 20 of 21 (95%) patients had a form of valgus heel alignment (planovalgus, n = 11; hindfoot valgus only, n = 9), and 1 had an isolated planus deformity. The contralateral side revealed similar deformity, with 17 of 21 (81%) patients having a form of valgus heel alignment (planovalgus, n = 13; hindfoot valgus only, n = 4) and 4 patients with an isolated planus deformity. All patients underwent realignment surgery with medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy. All radiographic parameters except Meary's angle (P = .885) significantly improved postoperatively along with significantly improved clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent pain following the Kidner procedure was associated with valgus heel alignment. Revision surgery including realignment procedure alleviated pain and improved functional outcomes with minimal complications. Therefore, we recommend assessing heel alignment in patients presenting with recurrent pain following the Kidner procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Painful Accessory Navicular and Spring Ligament Injuries in Athletes

Painful accessory navicular and spring ligament injuries in athletes are different entities from more common posterior tibialis tendon problems seen in older individuals. These injuries typically affect running and jumping athletes, causing medial arch pain and in severe cases a pes planus deformity. Diagnosis requires a detailed physical examination, standing radiographs, and MRI. Initial treatment focuses on rest, immobilization, and restriction from sports. Orthotic insoles may alleviate minor pain, but many patients need surgery to expedite recovery and return to sports. The authors review their approach to these injuries and provide surgical tips along with expected rehabilitation to provide optimal outcomes.

Short- to Mid-Term Outcomes Following the Use of an Arthroereisis Implant as an Adjunct for Correction of Flexible, Acquired Flatfoot Deformity in Adults

BACKGROUND

The use of an arthroereisis implant for the treatment of adolescent flatfoot deformity has been described. However, data that address the outcomes of patients treated with an arthroereisis implant in adults are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications following the use of a subtalar arthroereisis implant as an adjunct for correction acquired flatfoot deformity secondary to posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed querying all patients undergoing surgical flatfoot correction between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2015. The experimental group included patients undergoing arthroereisis augmentation at the time of flatfoot correction. Patients undergoing the same flatfoot correction without the use of an arthroereisis implant were used as controls. Radiographic measurements were evaluated preoperatively and at final radiographic follow-up and included talonavicular (TN) coverage angle, and lateral talar-first metatarsal angle (T1MA). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and postoperative Short Form-36, VAS, and satisfaction at final orthopedic follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients underwent flatfoot correction and were augmented with an arthroereisis implant and were matched with 30 controls. Postoperative, mid-term T1MA and regional analysis was found to be improved in the experimental group versus control. Patients undergoing adjunct subtalar arthroereisis demonstrated an increased likelihood of achieving radiographically normal talonavicular coverage <7° compared with our control group at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The adjunct use of an arthroereisis implant resulted in improved and maintained radiographic and clinical measurements in patients undergoing stage II flatfoot.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggest utility of a subtalar arthroereisis implant as an adjunct to flatfoot correction with little additional risk of harm to the patient.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Case-control study.

The role of arthroereisis of the subtalar joint for flatfoot in children and adults

Subtalar arthroereisis has been reported as a minimally-invasive, effective and low-risk procedure in the treatment of flatfoot mainly in children but also in adults.It has been described as a standalone or adjunctive procedure, and is indicated in the treatment of flexible flatfoot, tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction, tarsal coalition and accessory navicular syndrome.Different devices for subtalar arthroereisis are currently used throughout the world associated with soft-tissue and bone procedures, depending on the surgeon rather than on standardised or validated protocols.Sinus tarsi pain is the most frequent complication, often requiring removal of the implant.To date, poor-quality evidence is available in the literature (Level IV and V), with only one comparative non-randomised study (Level II) not providing strong recommendations. Long-term outcome and complication rates (especially the onset of osteoarthritis) are still unclear. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:438-446. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170009.

Accessory Navicular is Associated With Wider and More Prominent Navicular Bone in Pediatric Patients by Radiographic Measurement

BACKGROUND

Accessory navicular (AN) is a common anatomic variant that is known to cause medial foot pain. Surgery may be required for excision if conservative measures fail. Often, the medial border of the navicular is excised in addition to the AN during surgery. The purpose of this radiographic study is to determine if the presence of an AN is associated with a wider or more prominent navicular in pediatric patients compared with normal controls.

METHODS

This study included pediatric patients who received an initial plain anteroposterior foot radiograph between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2012 and were between the ages of 10 and 20 years. Feet with an AN were compared with those without, while controlling for age. Male and female patients were analyzed independently. Feet with fractures, deformities, or previous surgeries were excluded. Radiographic measurements included the navicular width and the protrusion of the navicular bone medially.

RESULTS

A total of 592 feet were included. An AN was identified in 73 feet. Male patients were analyzed separately from females. Cases with 1 AN bone had similar-sized native navicular bones in the contralateral normal foot compared with controls with 2 normal feet (P>0.05). The presence of an AN was associated with a larger navicular width (male: P=0.02, female: P=0.02) and a larger medial protrusion percent (male: P<0.01, female: P<0.01). Age was controlled for.

CONCLUSION

On radiographic examination, feet with an AN had wider native navicular bones that protruded more medially than feet without an AN.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-diagnostic.

Subtalar Arthroereisis Implant Removal in Adults: A Prospective Study of 100 Patients

Subtalar joint arthroereisis (STA) can be used in the management of adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD), including posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. The procedure is quick and normally causes little morbidity; however, the implant used for STA often needs to be removed because of sinus tarsi pain. The present study evaluated the rate and risk factors for removal of the implant used for STA in adults treated for AAFD/posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, including patient age, implant size, and the use of endoscopic gastrocnemius recession. Patients undergoing STA for adult acquired flatfoot were prospectively studied from 1996 to 2012. The inclusion criteria were an arthroereisis procedure for AAFD/posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, age >18 years, and a follow-up period of ≥2 years. The exclusion criteria were hindfoot arthritis, age <18 years, and a follow-up period of <2 years. A total of 100 patients (average age 53 years) underwent 104 STA procedures. The mean follow-up period was 6.5 (range 2 to 17) years. The overall incidence of implant removal was 22.1%. Patient age was not a risk factor for implant removal (p = .09). However, implant size was a factor for removal, with 11-mm implants removed significantly more frequently (p = .02). Endoscopic gastrocnemius recession did not exert any influence on the rate of implant removal (p = .19). After STA for AAFD, 22% of the implants were removed. No significant difference was found in the incidence of removal according to patient age or endoscopic gastrocnemius recession. However, a significant difference was found for implant size, with 11-mm implants explanted most frequently.

Prospective comparison of subtalar arthroereisis with lateral column lengthening for painful flatfeet

We prospectively compared subtalar arthroereisis with lateral column calcaneal lengthening for the treatment of painful flatfeet. Twenty-four feet (mean age of patients 12.8 years) were treated. Kinematic motion analysis, pedobarometry, and radiography were performed, and the Oxford Ankle-Foot Questionnaire for Children was administered for each patient before surgery and at the 1-year follow-up. We found statistically significant improvements in both groups, with no difference in their outcomes. Both groups showed significantly improved hindfoot and midfoot motion and positioning. Hindfoot range of motion was preserved. Radiography and pedobarometry also revealed significant improvements. Subtalar arthroereisis is a valid and potentially less-invasive alternative to lateral column lengthening that merits further investigation.

Concomitant calcaneo-cuboid-cuneiform osteotomies and the modified Kidner procedure for severe flatfoot associated with symptomatic accessory navicular in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Accessory navicular can become symptomatic in childhood, and in some cases, the condition is associated with progressive flattening of the longitudinal arch. Moreover, some severe, rigid flatfoot deformities are associated with an accessory navicular. We investigated the results of concomitant calcaneo-cuboid-cuneiform osteotomies (triple C) and the modified Kidner procedure for severe flatfoot associated with a symptomatic accessory navicular in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Twenty-one feet of 13 patients (nine boys, four girls; mean age 12.7 years) with severe flatfoot associated with a symptomatic accessory navicular who were treated with concomitant triple C and the modified Kidner procedure were evaluated based on clinical and radiographic examinations preoperatively and at a mean follow-up of 22.4 months (range, 12-36 months). We measured 12 variables on the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral weight-bearing radiographs, and we used the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons (ACFAS) score for clinical assessment.

RESULTS

We found significant improvements (p < 0.001) in eight of the 12 radiographic measurements: the AP talo-first metatarsal (MTT) angle, AP talo-navicular coverage angle, AP talo-calcaneal angle, lateral talo-first MTT angle, calcaneal pitch, lateral talo-calcaneal angle, lateral talo-horizontal angle, and naviculo-cuboid overlap. Average ACFAS scores were significantly improved at the time of the last follow-up (p < 0.001). The only complication was overcorrection of the hindfoot in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant triple C and the modified Kidner procedure result in favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes in the treatment of severe flatfoot associated with a symptomatic accessory navicular in children and adolescents.

Ongoing pain and deformity after an excision of the accessory navicular

Although a painful accessory navicula and a pes planus often coexist, they are not necessarily causally related, and each condition should be assessed and treated individually. A child or adolescent will notice the rubbing of an accessory navicula against footwear as the foot and boney swelling grows. The cause of persistent local pain such as inadequate bony resection, scar pain, irritation of the tibialis posterior tendon, and so forth should be sought and addressed; management will depend on the specific presentation and previous procedure performed. The cause of the ongoing pain should be investigated.