Circular external fixator-assisted ankle arthrodesis following failed total ankle arthroplasty

Treatment Options of Prosthetic Joint Infections Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Background: This comprehensive systematic review aims to explore and discuss existing treatment modalities for infections in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA), providing insights that may contribute to the establishment of a "standard of care" for these challenging cases. The study analyses the intricate landscape of infected TAA, addressing gaps in the current literature and emphasizing the need to refine treatment strategies. With the reported incidence of periprosthetic joint infection after TAA surpassing rates observed in total hip and knee replacements, the research navigates through various treatment modalities, underscoring the lack of a universally accepted standard of care. Methods: In this systematic review, following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, we identified 15 papers addressing the management strategies for infected TAA (162 infected ankle arthroplasty cases).These databases were chosen for their extensive coverage, strong relevance to the research topic, and ease of access, ensuring a thorough and focused retrieval of pertinent literature on the treatment of infected ankle prostheses. The review involved the identification and evaluation of articles providing insights into complications, treatment outcomes, and risk factors. Extracted data were summarized and reported. A descriptive analysis was performed, and when feasible, a statistical analysis was conducted. Results: Treatment modalities included irrigation and debridement (48.8%), revision total ankle arthroplasty (36.3%), primary arthrodesis (7.9%), spacer arthroplasty (4.5%), and primary amputation (3.9%). Complication rates varied, with 46.5% for irrigation and debridement, 20% for two-stage revision, 7.14% for primary arthrodesis, and 25% for spacer arthroplasty. Conclusions: The rising prevalence of TAA underscores the need for a definitive treatment protocol due to severe complications. This review emphasizes careful patient selection and accurate diagnosis. Irrigation and debridement are effective for acute infections, while two-stage revision is a valid alternative for chronic infections. High-quality randomized controlled trials are important for establishing an evidence-based treatment protocol.

Limb Salvage by Means of Hindfoot Arthrodesis Utilizing Bulk Allograft and External Fixation

FORMAT

Retrospective Review.

LENGTH OF FOLLOW-UP

18 months.

CLASSIFICATION

Rearfoot and Ankle Reconstruction.

METHODOLOGY

Level 4 Retrospective Review.

PROCEDURES

A retrospective review was performed of 6 patients who had undergone limb salvage procedures between January 2016 and April 2019. Patients underwent surgery due to severe limb-threatening diagnosis including Charcot and/or osteomyelitis. Salvage arthrodesis was performed with bulk femoral head allograft incorporation using a hexapod external fixation system. The external fixation was retained for an average of 16 weeks. All patients were followed for a postoperative period of 16 months.

RESULTS

Successful rearfoot arthrodesis and limb salvage was achieved in ⅚ (83%) of patients.

DISCUSSION

This review demonstrates that limb salvage and arthrodesis are possible using femoral head allograft incorporation by external fixation alone. The involved patients had resolution of the osteomyelitis and Charcot deformity, salvage arthrodesis of the rearfoot and avoidance of a major limb amputation.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Total Ankle Replacement Infections: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Periprosthetic infection (PJI) after TAR is a serious complication, often requiring further surgery, including revision arthroplasty, conversion to ankle arthrodesis, or even amputation. This systematic review aims to summarize the current evidence on the management of TAR PJI and provide a comprehensive overview of this topic, especially from an epidemiologic point of view. Three different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched for relevant articles, and further references were obtained by cross-referencing. Seventy-one studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on cases of TAR PJI. A total of 298 PJIs were retrieved. The mean incidence of PJI was 3.8% (range 0.2-26.1%). Furthermore, 53 (17.8%) were acute PJIs, whereas most of them (156, 52.3%) were late PJIs. Most of the studies were heterogeneous regarding the treatment protocols used, with a two-stage approach performed in most of the cases (107, 35.9%). While the prevalence of ankle PJI remains low, it is potentially one of the most devastating complications of TAR. This review highlights the lack of strong literature regarding TAR infections, thus highlighting a need for multicentric studies with homogeneous data regarding the treatment of ankle PJI to better understand outcomes.

Simultaneous tibio-talar fusion and tibial lengthening for end-stage ankle arthritis

PURPOSE

Arthrodesis of the ankle joint is an accepted treatment option in patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. The goal is to achieve fusion between the tibia and the talus, thereby stabilizing the joint and alleviating pain. There might be associated limb length discrepancy, especially in post-traumatic and post-infectious cases. These patients require limb lengthening and arthrodesis. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with simultaneous ankle arthrodesis and lengthening using external fixation in adolescent and young adult patients.

METHODS

This retrospective case series included all patients treated in our hospital by concomitant ankle arthrodesis and tibial lengthening procedures on the same limb, using ring external fixation system. All surgeries included distal tibial joint surface resection and the talar dome, thereby correcting any associated deformity at the ankle. The arthrodesis was fixed and compressed using ring external fixator. A concurrent proximal tibial osteotomy was done, and limb lengthening, or bone transport was performed.

RESULTS

Eight patients operated between the years 2012-2020 were included in this study. Median patient age was 20.4 years (range 4-62 years), 50% women. Median limb lengthening was 20 mm (range 10-55 mm), and median final leg length discrepancy (LLD) was 7.5 mm (range 1-72 mm). The most common complication recorded was pin tract infection, which resolved with empiric antibiotics in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Based on our experience, combined arthrodesis and proximal tibial lengthening is efficient solution that provides stable ankle and restores length of the tibia even in complex and challenging situations.

The use of a 3D printed titanium implant for arthrodesis in the management of large osseous defects in the ankle

BACKGROUND

Large osseous defects (LOD) in the ankle occur because of multiple aetiologies. Advancement in 3-dimensional (3D) printing technologies has led to the use of custom implants and instrumentation their management. A 3D printed patient-specific porous titanium cage which allows for peripheral osteo-integration and autogenous bone-grafting could be an ideal implant in these cases.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a multi-centre, multi-surgeon consecutive cohort of patients requiring either TTC or AA for a large osseous defect between June 2019 - August 2020. A custom titanium prosthesis was 3D-printed according to CT measurements for implantation.

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 19.5 months (range 12-24 months). Plain radiographs and CT scans at 12 months confirmed osseointegration (stability) in 11of 13 patients (84%). Two patients developed late infection, one requiring revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

3D-Printed titanium implants in the management of LODs in the ankle offer a comparable success rate to other reported procedures, with unlimited geometric possibilities in the design allowing for accurate length correction. Their structural stability may offer an advantage over conventional bone graft techniques and limits the amount of bone-graft required.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

LOE III.

Complex Ankle Fusion With Circular Frames: Factors Influencing Outcomes, Complications, and Patient Satisfaction

BACKGROUND

Circular frames for ankle fusion are reserved for complex clinical scenarios. The literature is heterogenous and conflicting. We aim to present the indications and outcomes of this procedure.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study based on a prospective database of frame surgeries performed in a tertiary institution. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing complex ankle fusion with circular frames between 2005 and 2020, with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Data were collected on patient demographics, surgical indications, comorbidities, surgical procedures, external fixator time (EFT), length of stay (LOS), radiologic and clinical outcomes, and adverse events. Factors influencing radiologic and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

47 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range [IQR] 20-40). The median age at time of surgery was 63.5 years (IQR 58-71). Patients had a median of 2 previous surgeries (IQR 1-3). The median LOS was 8.5 days, and median EFT was 237 days (IQR 166-280). Simultaneous limb lengthening (median 3.3 cm, IQR 1.9-3.5) was performed in 11 patients, increasing the EFT by a mean of 4 months. Primary and final union rates were 91.5% and 95.7%, respectively. At last follow-up, ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good in 87.2%. ASAMI functional scores were good in 79.1%. Patient satisfaction was 83.7%. In addition, 97.7% of patients experienced adverse events, most commonly pin-site related, with major complications in 30.2% and reoperations in 60.5%. There were 3 amputations. Adverse events were associated with increased age, poor soft tissue condition, severe deformities, subtalar fusions, peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and prolonged EFT.

CONCLUSION

Complex ankle fusion using circular frames can achieve good outcomes, however time in frame may be prolonged with a high rate of adverse events. Identified risk factors for poorer outcomes should be considered in patient counselling and prognostication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic.

New Method of Tibio-calcaneal-Navicular Arthrodesis After Talectomy

Background:

After astragalectomy, patients still have a shortening of the limb, which can require various reconstructive manipulations. We have developed a simple and versatile tibio-calcaneal-navicular arthrodesis (TCNA) technique to reduce limb shortening.

Methods:

The main difference from the standard method of arthrodesis between the tibia and calcaneus is that in our method after astragalectomy, the tibia rests with the anterior edge against the os navicularis, and the posterior edge against the calcaneus. We have observed 14 patients (2 were female, 12 were male) operated by a new method of tibio-calcaneal-navicular arthrodesis (TCNA) from 2003 to 2020 years with various forms of osteomyelitis, fractures, and septic necrosis of the talus. The average age of the patients was 42.2 (ranged 20-75) years. Observation results will be assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score 1-1.5 years after surgery and treatment time in the Ilizarov apparatus.

Results:

In all patients, the wounds healed by primary intention. The average time of immobilization in the apparatus was 4.9 (ranged 3.5-6) months. The average limb shortening 2.0 ± 0.5 cm. AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score (n = 14) in all patients came up to 77.9 ± 6.8 (min 68, max 86) SD 12.8. Nonunion was noted in the region of the anterior edge of the tibia in 1 patient (7.1%), and in another patient a painless nonunion was formed (7.1%). Patients wore ordinary footwear without arch supporter and with heels up to 2 cm.

Conclusion:

Good and satisfactory results were obtained in all patients. The new TCNA method allows restoring the supporting ability of a limb, reduces shortening, and improves the quality of life for patients.

Level of Evidence:

Level IV, case series, low-quality cohort or case- control studies.

Lower Limb Salvage Using Patent-Specific 3D-Printed Titanium Cage Following Severe Left Ankle Traumatic Partial Amputation: A Pediatric Case Report

BACKGROUND

Patients with large bony defects of the ankle who wish to avoid amputation have limited surgical intervention options for limb salvage. Each of these interventions are technically complex and present significant risk for complications. The use of a patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage in conjunction with a tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis using a retrograde nail is another management option. This case adds to the scarce published literature on this technique.

CASE PRESENTATION

This report presents the case of a 16-year-old female who suffered a traumatic partial amputation of her left distal lower extremity following an all-terrain-vehicle accident that resulted in a 10.0 × 10.0 cm skin laceration and a 5-cm subsegmental bony loss of the distal tibia. She was successfully treated using a patient-specific 3D-printed titanium truss cage in conjunction with a TTC arthrodesis using a retrograde nail.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to amputate or attempt limb salvage in a severely injured lower limb is still a topic of active debate. However, literature has shown that patients who undergo limb salvage surgery have better psychological health outcomes and equivalent functional outcomes as patients who have undergone amputation. Therefore, research on techniques that optimize and advance limb salvage surgery is needed. As the numerous potential benefits and limitations of patient-specific 3D-printed implants are assessed throughout the field of orthopedics, further research and cost-analysis will be required. Cases such as the one presented add to the limited existing literature of patient-specific 3D-printed implant for treatment of large distal lower extremity bony defects.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level V (Case Report).

The outcomes of revision surgery for a failed ankle arthroplasty

Aims

Revision rates for ankle arthroplasties are higher than hip or knee arthroplasties. When a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) fails, it can either undergo revision to another ankle replacement, revision of the TAA to ankle arthrodesis (fusion), or amputation. Currently there is a paucity of literature on the outcomes of these revisions. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the outcomes of revision TAA with respect to surgery type, functional outcomes, and reoperations.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Cochrane reviews were searched for relevant papers. Papers analyzing surgical treatment for failed ankle arthroplasties were included. All papers were reviewed by two authors. Overall, 34 papers met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed.

Results

Six papers analyzed all-cause reoperations of revision ankle arthroplasties, and 14 papers analyzed failures of conversion of a TAA to fusion. It was found that 26.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.4% to 40.1%) of revision ankle arthroplasties required further surgical intervention and 13.0% (95% CI 4.9% to 23.4%) of conversion to fusions; 14.4% (95% CI 8.4% to 21.4%) of revision ankle arthroplasties failed and 8% (95% CI 4% to 13%) of conversion to fusions failed.

Conclusion

Revision of primary TAA can be an effective procedure with improved functional outcomes, but has considerable risks of failure and reoperation, especially in those with periprosthetic joint infection. In those who undergo conversion of TAA to fusion, there are high rates of nonunion. Further comparative studies are required to compare both operative techniques. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):596–606.

Periprosthetic ankle infection: eradication rate, complications, and limb salvage. A systematic review

BACKGROUND

This systematic review investigated the outcomes of revision surgery after periprosthetic ankle infection (PAI).

METHODS

According to the PRISMA statement, 9 studies with 131 PAIs surgically treated and analyzed were included. Demographics and surgical techniques with eradication rates and complications were reported.

RESULTS

Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (30.4%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS) (26.5%) were the most common microorganisms. The eradication rate was 91.7% with permanent antibiotic spacers (SPC), 84.4% with 2-stage, 79.4% with arthrodesis (AA), and 58.8% with debridement and implant retention (DAIR). DAIR showed a significantly lower eradication rate than 2-stage (p = 0.016) and SPC (p = 0.043). Amputations occurred in 25% of patients after SPC, 8.8% after AA and 3.9% after DAIR. SPC showed a significantly higher amputation rate than DAIR and 2-stage (p = 0.044, and p = 0.017, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

SPC and 2-stage revision show the highest eradication rates, but 2-stage has a lower risk of amputation.

Simultaneous Limb Lengthening With Ankle Fusion Using an Internal Lengthening Nail

We reviewed 18 limbs in 17 patients who underwent ankle fusion with simultaneous tibial lengthening with a magnetic internal lengthening nail. All patients had preoperative limb length discrepancy (LLD) (mean 4.9 cm (2.6-7.6 cm)) with ankle deformity. The ankle was fused from medial or lateral approaches using screws/plate constructs placed adjacent to the retrograde Precise nail. Lengthening was carried out by a distal 1/3 tibial osteotomy. Clinical and radiographic measures were performed after a mean follow-up of 20 months (12-37 months). The mean amount of lengthening performed was 4 cm (1.8-7.2 cm). The final mean LLD was 1 cm (0.7-1.1 cm), which was statistically significant (p<0.01) as compared to preoperative. The foot was plantigrade in all cases. The mean foot rotation was 10° (5-15°) external, relative to the knee. At final follow-up all patients reported minimal to no pain, and all claimed to be walking more functionally than before surgery. Ankle fusion and limb lengthening was achieved in all cases. Combining both treatments by using an internal lengthening nail was very effective and avoided leaving patients with a dysfunctional LLD or of having a separate limb lengthening procedure. This is the first report of such a combined treatment of ankle fusion with internal tibial lengthening nail.

A Staged Approach to Combined Extra-articular Limb Deformity Correction and Total Ankle Arthroplasty for End-Stage Ankle Arthritis

BACKGROUND

Patients presenting with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) in the setting of a concomitant extra-articular limb deformity pose a challenging problem that has not yet been described in the literature. We describe a case series of patients treated with external and internal fixation techniques followed by total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in a staged approach to treat this complex presentation.

METHODS

Eight patients with limb deformity and end-stage ankle OA who underwent staged deformity correction and TAA from 2016 to 2019 at our institution were retrospectively identified. Average age was 58.5 (range, 49-68) years, with an average follow-up of 2.6 (range, 0.8-4.2) years. All patients underwent limb reconstruction with either tibial osteotomy with a circular frame (n=6) or intramedullary nail (n=2). Limb deformities consisted of the following: posttraumatic tibial malunion (2), limb length discrepancy (1), acquired tibial deformity (1), genu varum (2), or genu valgum (2). Radiographic parameters were assessed pre- and postoperatively on 51-inch standing and ankle radiographs: limb length discrepancy (LLD), genu varum/valgum deformity, recurvatum deformity, mechanical axis deviation, medial proximal tibial angle, lateral distal tibial angle, anterior distal tibial angle, and tibiotalar alignment. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes were assessed using 2 metrics, the Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores (Physical Function, Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, Global Physical Function, and Global Mental Function).

RESULTS

Following staged limb deformity correction and TAA, all patients achieved correction of LLD and angular deformities of the lower limb, along with restoration of normal alignment of the ankle joint. There was significant mean improvement in all patient-reported LD-SRS and PROMIS domains, except for LD-SRS mental health. LD-SRS function improved from 2.6 (±0.7) to 4.6 (±0.2), P = .008; pain improved from 2.9 (±0.9) to 4.8 (±0.2), P = .012; self-image improved from 2.9 (±0.4) to 4.7 (±0.3), P < .001; and total LD-SRS improved from 3.3 (±0.4) to 4.8 (±0.2), P = .002. Average satisfaction was 4.9 (±0.3). PROMIS physical function improved from 32.3 (±6.8) to 51.3 (±5.3), P = .008; pain interference improved from 66.0 (±9.1) to 41.3 (±6.2), P = .004; pain intensity improved from 60.0 (±13.3) to 33.1 (±5.3), P = .007; global physical health improved from 39.3 (±6.8) to 60.7 (±5.1), P = .002; global mental health improved from 54.8 (±5.9) to 65.6 (±2.8), P = .007. There was one incidence of pin site infection and one reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Deformity correction with either external frame or intramedullary nail fixation followed by TAA in a staged approach was a viable surgical option in the treatment of end-stage ankle OA with concurrent extra-articular limb deformity. This unique approach was capable of achieving deformity correction with improved patient-reported outcomes, minimal complications, and good patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Results and Outcomes of Combined Cross Screw and Ilizarov External Fixator Frame in Ankle Fusion

Ankle fusion is a treatment option for end-stage ankle arthritis. Fusion site stability and optimal foot positioning are crucial parameters. We present the results of our double fixation technique, combining both cross-screw fixation and Ilizarov external fixator frame via transmalleolar approach. We reviewed the files from 52 patients operated for ankle fusion in our center. In our technique, we use a transmalleolar approach, initial stabilization with 2 cannulated, half-threaded cross screws, and final stabilization with an Ilizarov external fixator frame. Fusion stability, weightbearing time, complication rates, and final functional scores were recorded and evaluated. Mean frame removal time was 11.2 ± 2.1 weeks, and 71.6% of patients were fully weightbearing at that time. Absolute fusion stability was reported in 88.46% of patients at that time, while no pseudarthrosis was noted in final follow-up at 12 months. According to the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot-ankle score evaluation at 12 months, 90.4% of patients reported excellent and 9.6% good results. None of the patients was referred for symptomatic forefoot arthritis, and there were no cases of deep infection or deep vein thrombosis. Material-related complications were reported in 1 patient who was treated with implant removal after 1 year. Ankle fusion is a salvage procedure that offers optimal results in end-stage ankle arthritis. Our technique offers absolute fusion site stability with excellent functional results, minor complications, and the advantages of early protected weightbearing. Careful patient selection in addition to fine foot positioning should be regarded as crucial for the final outcome.

Tibial lengthening using a retrograde magnetically driven intramedullary lengthening device in 10 patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion

Background and purpose - Motorized intramedullary lengthening nails (ILNs) have been developed as an alternative to external fixators for long bone lengthening. The antegrade approach represents the standard method for tibial ILN insertion. In patients with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion a retrograde approach provides an alternative technique that has not been evaluated so far. We report the outcome of this method in 10 patients. Patients and methods - This retrospective study included 10 patients (mean age 18 years [13-25]) with preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion who underwent tibial lengthening with a retrograde ILN (PRECICE). The mean leg length discrepancy (LLD) was 58 mm (36-80). The underlying conditions were congenital (n = 9) and post tumor resection (n = 1). The main outcome measures were: ILN reliability, distraction achieved, distraction index (DIX), time to bone healing, consolidation index (CIX), complications, and functional results. Results - All patients achieved the goal of lengthening (mean 48 mm [26-80]). Average DIX was 0.6 mm/day (0.5-0.7) and mean CIX was 44 days/cm (26-60). Delayed consolidation occurred in 2 patients and healed after ILN dynamization or nail exchange with grafting. Toe contractures in 2 other patients were resolved with physiotherapy or tenotomy. Until last follow-up (mean 18 months [12-30]) no true complications were encountered, knee motion remained unaffected, and full osseous consolidation occurred in all patients. Interpretation - In patients with LLD and preexisting ankle and hindfoot fusion distal tibial lengthening using a retrograde ILN is a reliable alternative to the standard approach with equivalent bone healing potential and low complication rates leaving the knee unaffected.

Revision Surgery for Failed Total Ankle Replacement

Revision surgery for failed total ankle replacement is a challenge to the revision surgeon. Deformity, presence of infection, segmental bone defects, patient comorbidities, and soft tissue compromise all are significant considerations when determining appropriate procedures. Revision total ankle replacement, explant and fusion with or without lengthening, use of a trabecular metal cage, placement of an antibiotic cement spacer, grafting, and amputation all are viable options to treat patients with failed ankle arthroplasty.

Salvage Arthrodesis for Failed Total Ankle Replacement

Salvage arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement can be a successful procedure. The decision to perform salvage arthrodesis is based on many factors, but the following are the most important indications: severe loss of bonestock (tibia, talus, or both), inadequate soft tissue coverage, or the inability to eradicate an infection. With few revision implants on the market, salvage arthrodesis is currently the most common treatment for failed replacement and justification for revision ankle replacement is limited when any of these factors are present.

Distal tibial distraction osteogenesis-an alternative approach to addressing limb length discrepancy with concurrent hindfoot and ankle reconstruction

Background

Limb length discrepancy (LLD) in the setting of concurrent hindfoot and ankle deformity poses an added level of complexity to the reconstructive surgeon. Regardless of etiology, a clinically significant LLD poses additional challenges without a forthright and validated solution. The purpose of the current study is to determine whether reconstructive hindfoot and ankle surgery with concurrent lengthening through a distal tibial corticotomy is comparable to other treatment alternatives in the literature.

Patients and methods

A retrospective review of hindfoot and ankle deformity correction utilizing Ilizarov circular external fixation with concurrent distal tibial distraction osteogenesis from July 2009 to September 2014 was conducted.

Results

This study included 19 patients with a mean age of 47.47 ± 13.36 years with a mean follow up of 576.13 ± 341.89 days. The mean preoperative LLD was 2.70 ± 1.22 cm and the mean operatively induced LLD was 2.53 ± 0.59 cm. The mean latency period was 9.33 ± 3.47 days and distraction rate was 0.55 ± 0.16 mm/day. The mean distraction length was 2.14 ± 0.83 cm and mean duration of external fixation was 146.42 ± 58.69 days. The time to union of all hindfoot and ankle fusions was 121.00 ± 25.66 days with an overall fusion rate of 85.71%.

Conclusions

The successful treatment of hindfoot and ankle deformity correction in the setting of LLD using the technique of a distal tibial corticotomy and distraction osteogenesis is reported and illustrates an additional treatment technique with comparable measured outcomes to those previously described. We urge that each patient presentation be evaluated with consideration of all described approaches and associated literature to determine the current best reconstructive approach as future studies may validate or replace the accepted options at present.

What Is the Treatment "Algorithm" for an Infected Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA)?

RECOMMENDATION

The treatment of an infected total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is largely dictated by the acuity of the infection. The following treatment algorithm modified for TAA is recommended.¹⁹.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Limited.

DELEGATE VOTE

Agree: 100%, Disagree: 0%, Abstain: 0% (Unanimous, Strongest Consensus).

Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Background:

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a serious complication that results in significant consequences to the patient and threatens the survival of the ankle replacement. PJI in TAA may require debridement, placement of antibiotic spacer, revision arthroplasty, conversion to arthrodesis, or potentially below the knee amputation. While the practice of TAA has gained popularity in recent years, there is some minimal data regarding wound complications in acute or chronic PJI of TAA. However, of the limited studies that describe complications of PJI of TAA, even fewer studies describe the criteria used in diagnosing PJI. This review will cover the current available literature regarding total ankle arthroplasty infection and will propose a model for treatment options for acute and chronic PJI in TAA.

Methods:

A review of the current literature was conducted to identify clinical investigations in which prosthetic joint infections occurred in total ankle arthroplasty with associated clinical findings, radiographic imaging, and functional outcomes. The electronic databases for all peer-reviewed published works available through January 31, 2018, of the Cochrane Library, PubMed MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were explored using the following search terms and Boolean operators: “total ankle replacement” OR “total ankle arthroplasty” AND “periprosthetic joint infection” AND “diagnosis” OR “diagnostic criteria.” An article was considered eligible for inclusion if it concerned diagnostic criteria of acute or chronic periprosthetic joint infection of total ankle arthroplasty regardless of the number of patients treated, type of TAA utilized, conclusion, or level of evidence of study.

Results:

No studies were found in the review of the literature describing criteria for diagnosing PJI specific to TAA.

Conclusions:

Literature describing the diagnosis and treatment of PJI in TAA is entirely reliant on the literature surrounding knee and hip arthroplasty. Because of the limited volume of total ankle arthroplasty in comparison to knee and hip arthroplasty, no studies to our knowledge exist describing diagnostic criteria specific to total ankle arthroplasty with associated reliability. Large multicenter trials may be required to obtain the volume necessary to accurately describe diagnostic criteria of PJI specific to TAA.

Level of Evidence:

Level III, systematic review.

Large Osseous Defect Reconstruction Using a Custom Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium Truss Implant

Treatment of large osseous defects remains a difficult surgical challenge. Autografts and allografts have been known to undergo late collapse, because these options are not specifically designed to withstand the high loads of the foot and ankle. The inability to achieve the correct shape for reconstruction further limits their application. Large osseous defects will result during salvage after failed Lapidus bunionectomy, explantation of failed total ankle replacements, and nonunion of Evans calcaneal osteotomy. Each of 3 patients received a 4WEB custom 3-dimensional (3D) titanium truss implant (Patient Specific Custom Implant; 4WEB Medical, Inc., Frisco, TX) for reconstruction. The mean follow-up period was 17.33 ± 3.51 months. Significant improvement was seen in pain, with a successful return to activities of daily living. The 12-month postoperative computed tomography findings demonstrated incorporation of the implant to the surrounding cortical and cancellous bone. No signs of delayed complications, such as stress shielding or implant failure, were found. This is the first case series to describe the use of a custom 3D-printed titanium truss implant to successfully contribute to reconstruction in the setting of failed elective foot and ankle surgery. This technology might play an important role in limb salvage of osseous defects that would otherwise require bone block arthrodesis with structural allograft or autograft bone.

[Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement and conversion to ankle arthrodesis]

OBJECTIVE

To remove loosened prosthesis components, to perform augmentation, to address osseous defects, to perform neutrally aligned ankle arthrodesis, and to achieve postoperative pain relief.

INDICATIONS

Symptomatic, aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement (TAR) with/without substantial bone defect of the tibial and/or talar bone stock.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

General surgical or anesthesiological risks, periprosthetic infection, local or systemic infection, nonmanageable soft tissue problems.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Removal of both prosthesis components using the previous incision (mostly using anterior ankle approach). Careful debridement of bone stock at the tibial and talar side. Osseous augmentation of defects using autologous or homologous cancellous bone, if needed, using structural allografts.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

A soft wound dressing is used. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended. Patient mobilization starts on postoperative day 1 with 15 kg partial weight bearing using a stabilizing walking boot or cast for 6-8 weeks. Following clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, full weight bearing is initiated gradually after progressive osseous healing has been confirmed.

RESULTS

Between January 2007 and December 2012, ankle arthrodesis was performed in 9 patients with failed TAR (6 men and 3 women, mean age 56.4 ± 7.0 years, range 47.8-66.0 years). The mean time between the initial TAR and revision surgery was 4.5 ± 2.4 years (range 1.2-7.9 years). In one patient irrigation and debridement was performed due to superficial wound infection. Another patient had a delayed osseous healing 11 months after the revision surgery.

The painful total ankle arthroplasty: a diagnostic and treatment algorithm

The last decade has seen a considerable increase in the use of in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) to treat patients with end-stage arthritis of the knee. However, the longevity of the implants is still far from that of total knee and hip arthroplasties. The aim of this review is to outline a diagnostic and treatment algorithm for the painful TAA to be used when considering revision surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:5-11.

Salvage of Failed Total Ankle Replacement Using a Custom Titanium Truss

Subsidence of the talar component results in significant morbidity after total ankle replacement. When recognized, prompt revision could be needed to preserve the function of the implant; however, this is not always the case. In situations in which the implant cannot be revised, tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis might be necessary to salvage the extremity. The purpose of the present report is to describe the use of a custom titanium alloy truss to fill a bony void created by explantation of the implant components. Total ankle replacement was performed as the initial surgery to address end-stage osteoarthritis. Two years after the index procedure, the patient underwent revision of the polyethylene and talar components with subtalar arthrodesis secondary to progressive subtalar osteoarthritis and talar subsidence. The implant subsequently became infected and was removed. The patient underwent re-implantation after the infection had resolved, but significant talar subsidence required conversion to a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a custom titanium alloy truss and retrograde intramedullary nail. At the most recent follow-up appointment, the patient was weightbearing on a stable extremity and pain free. Radiographic examination confirmed appropriate implant alignment and evidence of bone formation throughout the titanium truss. Although our results are restricted to a single case with initial, limited follow-up data, combining sound structural mechanics with an open architecture and unique texture, the custom titanium truss appears to maintain the limb length and promote healing across a large void.

Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional Printed Titanium Truss Cage With Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis for Salvage of Persistent Distal Tibia Nonunion

Management of large structural defects of the ankle and hindfoot is challenging with modest outcomes in the literature. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail has been used for the treatment of talar avascular necrosis, severe tibial plafond fractures, ankle and hindfoot nonunions, Charcot arthropathy, and failed total ankle arthroplasty. External fixators and spatial frames provide robust multiplanar correction of deformity, but little is known in the literature regarding the salvage treatment of persistent nonunion refractory to frame treatment. In this report, we present the case of an open tibial plafond fracture with nonunion despite 1 year of fixator and frame management that was successfully treated using a patient-specific 3-dimensional printed titanium truss cage in combination with a retrograde TTC nail. At most recent 1-year follow-up, the patient had minimal pain, no wound complications, and was able to ambulate and work independently without an assistive device for the first time in 2 years since his original injury. The case presented here serves as a proof of principle that requires future research to determine its long-term clinical benefits, cost-effectiveness, and complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V: Expert Opinion.

Complex ankle arthrodesis: Review of the literature

Complex ankle arthrodesis is defined as an ankle fusion that is at high risk of delayed and nonunion secondary to patient comorbidities and/or local ankle/hindfoot factors. Risk factors that contribute to defining this group of patients can be divided into systemic factors and local factors pertaining to co-existing ankle or hindfoot pathology. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of these risk factors and their association with patients' outcomes after complex ankle fusions. Both external and internal fixations have demonstrated positive outcomes with regards to achieving stable fixation and minimizing infection. Recent innovations in the application of biophysical agents and devices have shown promising results as adjuncts for healing. Both osteoconductive and osteoinductive agents have been effectively utilized as biological adjuncts for bone healing with low complication rates. Devices such as pulsed electromagnetic field bone stimulators, internal direct current stimulators and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound bone stimulators have been associated with faster bone healing and improved outcomes scores when compared with controls. The aim of this review article is to present a comprehensive approach to the management of complex ankle fusions, including the use of biophysical adjuncts for healing and a proposed algorithm for their treatment.

Complex ankle arthrodesis: Review of the literature

Complex ankle arthrodesis is defined as an ankle fusion that is at high risk of delayed and nonunion secondary to patient comorbidities and/or local ankle/hindfoot factors. Risk factors that contribute to defining this group of patients can be divided into systemic factors and local factors pertaining to co-existing ankle or hindfoot pathology. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of these risk factors and their association with patients’ outcomes after complex ankle fusions. Both external and internal fixations have demonstrated positive outcomes with regards to achieving stable fixation and minimizing infection. Recent innovations in the application of biophysical agents and devices have shown promising results as adjuncts for healing. Both osteoconductive and osteoinductive agents have been effectively utilized as biological adjuncts for bone healing with low complication rates. Devices such as pulsed electromagnetic field bone stimulators, internal direct current stimulators and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound bone stimulators have been associated with faster bone healing and improved outcomes scores when compared with controls. The aim of this review article is to present a comprehensive approach to the management of complex ankle fusions, including the use of biophysical adjuncts for healing and a proposed algorithm for their treatment.

Evaluation and management of the painful total ankle arthroplasty

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an increasingly popular treatment option for patients with end-stage ankle arthritis. Although improved short- and long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes have been achieved with TAA, revision surgery may be necessary in the setting of aseptic loosening, subsidence, impingement, arthrofibrosis, or infection. Factors such as patient selection, implant design, and surgical technique can all contribute to TAA failure. Treatment of patients with a painful TAA is complex and requires careful consideration of symptom history, workup, and nonsurgical and surgical treatment options. Surgical management of failed TAA includes arthrodesis, revision surgery, or below-knee amputation.

Intermediate-term Results of Mobile-bearing Total Ankle Replacement

BACKGROUND

The literature analyzing total ankle replacement (TAR) results should be critically interpreted because studies made by the design surgeons are potentially subject to bias. European nondesigner surgeon studies reviewing the HINTEGRA TAR system are scarce in the literature. The present study is a European nondesigner surgeon study reviewing a consecutive series of 50 HINTEGRA TAR systems with a minimum follow-up of 2 years, focusing on clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

Fifty primary TAR procedures were performed between February 2008 and January 2012 by a single surgeon. Every patient underwent a standardized clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and annually thereafter. The mean time to final follow-up was 45 months.

RESULTS

The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score significantly increased from 43.5 preoperatively to 83.8 postoperatively. Clinical range of motion of the ankle also improved from 23.3 degrees preoperatively to 28.3 degrees postoperatively. In 70% of the TAR procedures, the talar component was positioned anteriorly with respect to the tibial axis. Radiological evidence of osteolysis was identified in 24 ankles. The failure rate in the present series was 10%, which was defined as having major revision surgery within 4 years.

CONCLUSION

The survival of the first 50 HINTEGRA TAR systems in this series was satisfactory from clinical and radiological points of view. However, the incidence of asymptomatic periprosthetic osteolytic lesions was quite high (24 ankles).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

As the number of total ankle replacements (TARs) performed has risen, so has the need for revision. The purpose of this investigation was to perform a systematic review of clinical outcomes following a salvage ankle arthrodesis from a failed TAR to identify patient- and technique-specific prognostic factors and to determine the clinical outcomes and complications following an ankle arthrodesis for a failed TAR.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies that analyzed ankle fusion after failed TAR with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

RESULTS

We included 16 studies (193 patients). The majority of patients (41%) underwent the index TAR for rheumatoid arthritis. The majority of these revision surgeries were secondary to component loosening, frequently of the talar component (38%). In the cases that were revised to an ankle arthrodesis, 81% fused after their first arthrodesis procedure. The intercalary bone graft group and the blade plate group had the highest rate of fusion after the first attempt at fusion at 100%, whereas the tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with cage group had the lowest fusion rate at 50%. The overall complication rate was 18.2%, whereas the overall nonunion rate was 10.6%.

CONCLUSION

A salvage ankle arthrodesis for a failed TAR results in favorable clinical end points and overall satisfaction at short-term follow-up if the patients achieve fusion. The bone graft fusion and blade plate group resulted in the highest first-attempt fusion rate, with a low complication rate. Future studies should include prospective, comparative control or surgical groups and use standardized outcome measurements that will make direct comparisons easier.

LEVELS

Level IV: Systematic Review of Level IV Studies.

The management of infection following total ankle replacement: demographics and treatment

BACKGROUND

Little has been published on the management of infected total ankle replacements. This study reviewed our experience with this difficult clinical problem.

METHODS

From 2002 to 2011 we retrospectively evaluated patients requiring prosthesis removal for infection following primary or revision total ankle replacement. Infections were classified as acute postoperative, late chronic, or remote hematogenous. The demographics, treatment, and outcome of the infected replacements were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 613 replacements performed during this time period, 15 infections occurred at our institution and 4 from other institutions were treated. These 19 cases included 15 late chronic infections, 3 early postoperative infections, and 1 acute hematogenous infection. Fourteen of the infections occurred in a subset of 433 prostheses (3.2%) placed between 2002 and 2009 when we used an implant with a unique design that necessitated a tibiofibular syndesmosis fusion for the tibial component support (Agility, Depuy). One infection occurred out of 139 other prostheses (0.7%) between 2009 and 2011 when we switched to an anatomic design fixed bearing implant system. Prosthesis salvage was attempted in the 3 early postoperative and 1 acute hematogenous cases, however they all required subsequent removal of the prosthesis. Mean time to removal of the prosthesis after the index arthroplasty was 18 months. Mean follow-up was 19 months from the time of prosthesis removal. Three of the 19 patients underwent successful revision with replacement, 6 with arthrodesis, 7 with a permanent antibiotic spacer, and 3 patients required a transtibial amputation.

CONCLUSION

Only a limited number of patients who develop a deep infection following primary or revision total ankle arthroplasty can expect to undergo successful joint-preserving revision ankle arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case series.

Arthrodesis After Failed Total Ankle Replacement

BACKGROUND

The literature on salvage procedures for failed total ankle replacement (TAR) is sparse. We report a series of 17 patients who had a failed TAR converted to a tibiotalar or a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2012, a total of 17 patients with a failed TAR underwent an arthrodesis. All patients were followed on a regular basis through chart review, clinical examination and radiological evaluation. The following variables were analyzed: pre- and postoperative Meary angle, cause of failure, method of fixation, type of graft, time to union, complications, and postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. The average follow-up was 30.1 months. The average period from the original arthroplasty to the arthrodesis was 49.8 months.

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 17 ankles were considered radiographically healed after the first attempt in an average time of 3.7 months and 3 after repeat arthrodesis. Bone grafts were used in 16 patients. The median postoperative AOFAS score was 74.5. The mean Meary angle of the hindfoot was 5 degrees of valgus.

CONCLUSION

Tibiotalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodeses were effective salvage procedures for failed TAR. Massive cancellous allografts were a good alternative to compensate for the large bone defect after removal of the prosthesis and to preserve the leg length.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Ankle salvage surgery with autologous circular pillar fibula augmentation and intramedullary hindfoot nail

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an intramedullary hindfoot nail is an established procedure for fusion of the ankle and subtalar joints. In cases involving ankle bone loss, such as in failed total ankle replacement, it can be difficult to salvage with sufficient bone restoration stability and a physiologic leg length and avoiding below the knee amputation. In addition to the alternatives of using a structural allograft or metal bone substitution, we describe the use of autologous ipsilateral circular pillar fibula augmentation in tibiotalocalcaneal retrograde nail arthrodesis combined with a ventral (anterior) plate in a prospective series of 6 consecutive cases with a mean follow-up duration of 26 ± 9.95 (range 12 to 34) months. The 6 patients (3 female and 3 male), with a mean age of 55 ± 13.89 (range 38 to 73) years were treated with revision surgery of the ankle (1 after talectomy, 5 [83.33%] after failed ankle replacement). The visual analog scale for pain and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot score were used to assess functional outcome, and radiographs and computed tomography scans were used to determine the presence of fusion. All patients improved clinically from pre- to postoperatively in regard to the mean pain visual analog scale score (from 7.5 to 2.0) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society hindfoot score (from 29 to 65 points, of an 86-point maximum for fused joints). Radiologically, no loss in the reduction or misalignment of the hindfoot was detected, and all cases fused solid. One patient (16.67%) required hardware removal. The fixation construct provided good clinical and radiologic outcomes, and we recommend it as an alternative to structural allografts or metallic bone grafts for revision ankle surgery with severe bone loss.