Microbial contamination in open globe injury

Utility of wound cultures in the management of open globe injuries: a 5-year retrospective review

Background

Endophthalmitis after open globe injury can be devastating to vision recovery. As treatment of endophthalmitis is often empiric, some surgeons may obtain cultures at presentation of trauma in anticipation of later infection. This study examines the usefulness of wound cultures obtained during globe repair.

Results

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed, with 168 open globes included. Cultures of the wound site had been taken in all cases included in this study. Wound cultures were positive in 63% of cases but were not used for clinical decision-making for any patient in this study. Two patients had evidence of endophthalmitis at presentation, with results of vitreous culture matching those from the wound. No patient later developed endophthalmitis after open globe repair.

Conclusions

Despite a high rate of wound contamination, few cases of endophthalmitis (1.2%) were seen in this series. In no case did the results of wound culture impact choice of antibiotic prophylaxis or treatment. Cultures obtained at the time of open globe repair were not cost effective in the subsequent management of the injury.

Survey of Intraocular Antibiotics Prophylaxis Practice after Open Globe Injury in China

Purpose

To elucidate the Chinese practice of intraocular antibiotics administration for prophylaxis after open globe injury.

Methods

A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was performed online by scanning a Quickmark (QR) code with smartphones at the 20^th Chinese National Conference of Ocular Trauma in November 2014.

Results

A total of 153 (30.6%) of all participators at the conference responded. Of the respondents, 20.9% were routinely administered with prophylactic intraocular injection of antibiotics at the conclusion of the primary eye repair, and 56.9% were used only in cases with high risk of endophthalmitis development. The intraocular route of delivery was mainly included with intracameral injection (47.9%) and intravitreal injection (42.0%). Cephalosporins (53.8%) and vancomycin (42.0%) were the main choices of antibiotic agents, followed by fluoroquinolones (24.3%), and aminoglycosides (13.4%). Only 21.9% preferred a combination of two or more two drugs routinely. In addition, significantly more respondents from the referral eye hospital (92.7%) replied using intraocular antibiotics injection for prophylaxis compared to those respondents from the primary hospital (69.4%) (p = 0.001, Fisher’s exact test).

Conclusions

Intraocular antibiotics injection for post-traumatic endophthalmitis prophylaxis is widely used in China. However, the choice of antibiotic agents and the intraocular route of delivery vary. A well-designed clinical trial is needed to establish a standardized protocol of intraocular antibiotics administration for post-traumatic endophthalmitis prophylaxis.

Needle contamination in the setting of intravitreal injections

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To evaluate the risk of intravitreal needle contamination through speaking versus breathing in an office setting.

METHODS

This was a prospective sampling assay. Participants held a sterile 30-gauge half-inch needle 25 cm from their mouth for 30 seconds under 2 conditions: (1) while speaking and (2) while breathing silently. Needles were then cultured and assayed after 6 days of incubation. Absolute colony-forming units were compared between conditions and against control sterile needles and oral swab cultures.

RESULTS

Ten physicians were sampled with 15 samples per physician. Participants grew an average of 0.21 colonies (median = 1 CFU) from their talking samples and 0.07 colonies (median = 1 CFU) from their silent breathing samples. Oral swab plates grew an average of 373.4 colonies. None of the control needle plates grew colony-forming units. A nominal regression analysis showed no significant difference between talking and silent samples (P = 0.457).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in needle contamination was found between talking and breathing. Compared with oral swab plates, a significant difference exists between the amount of flora colonizing the oropharynx and that which was found on the needle cultures (P < 0.0001). These findings suggest that speaking versus remaining silent makes no difference in regard to needle contamination with oral flora during intravitreal injection.

Identification of Curvularia lunata by polymerase chain reaction in a case of fungal endophthalmitis

Curvularia is a dematiaceous mold that infects plant species and is found in the soil. In humans, it is known to cause keratitis after trauma to the eye. We report the findings of persistent fungal endophthalmitis in a 74-year-old female patient who had undergone prior cataract surgery. Mold identification and antifungal susceptibilities were done on 2 separate samples of vitreous fluid and they were found to be consistent with Curvularia lunata by the use of PCR amplification methods.