Proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin versus proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-metronidazole as first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

Assessing the efficacy of cinnamon compounds against H. pylori through molecular docking, MD Simulations and ADMET analyses

Antibiotics are the drugs that are used for the management of microbial diseases. However, these conventional synthetic drugs can harmfully affect the human health. Since phytochemicals are extracted from natural sources and, are hence relatively safer for human health, they are the enticing alternatives in this regard. Cinnamon is also one of those plants which is being employed as herbal medication for centuries against certain microbial infections due its significant therapeutic effectiveness. A well-known pathogenic bacterium called H. pylori causes a wide range of illnesses in human body. This pathogen's pathogenicity is determined by certain virulent proteins. In this study, some of such proteins, which included virB4, virB8, and virB9 were selected to evaluate the therapeutic efficiency of cinnamon compounds. These proteins were identified in different isolates of H. pylori. The structural modelling of all these proteins were performed initially in order to proceed them for molecular docking analysis. While, the docking studies illustrated that one of the cinnamon compounds, cinnamyl acetate, showed significant binding interactions with virB4 and virB9. However, benzyl benzoate which is another cinnamon compound, docked well with virB8. Afterwards, the MD simulations were incorporated to explore the interaction motions and structural stability of all the docked complexes. In this regard, the resultant maps of Bfactor, eigenvalues and elastic network model, among other factors ensured the structural stabilities of all the respective complexes. After these crucial estimations, benzyl benzoate and cinnamyl acetate underwent the ADMET investigation to assess their pharmacokinetic characteristics. SwissADME and ADMETLab 2.0 server were employed for this investigation. The compiled findings these servers revealed that both, benzyl benzoate and cinnamyl acetate, exhibited a significant level of pharmacokinetic and drug-likeness conformity.

Mutations associated with Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial resistance in the Ecuadorian population

AIMS

We described the presence of Helicobacter pylori (HP) and estimated the prevalence of primary and secondary resistance using molecular detection in gastric biopsies of Ecuadorian patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

66.7% (238/357) of the patients demonstrated the presence of HP using CerTest qPCR. Of these, 69.79% (104/149) were without previous HP eradication treatment and 64.42% (134/208) with prior HP eradication treatment. The mutation-associated resistance rate for clarithromycin was 33.64% (primary resistance) and 32.82% (secondary resistance), whereas that in levofloxacin the primary and secondary resistance was 37.38% and 42%, respectively. For tetracycline and rifabutin, primary and secondary resistance was 0%. Primary and secondary resistance for metronidazole and amoxicillin could not be evaluated by genotypic methods (PCR and sequencing).

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis of mutations in gyrA, 23S rRNA and 16S rRNA is useful to detect bacterial resistance as a guide for eradication therapy following failure of the first-line regimen.

SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY

This study carried out in an Ecuadorian population indicates that the resistance of HP to first-line antibiotics is high, which may contribute to the high rates of treatment failure, and other treatment alternatives should be considered.

Molecular Docking of Anti Helicobacter pylori Antibiotics and Proton Pump Inhibitor: A Single Center Survey

Helicobacter pylorus (H. pylori) is a deadly bacterium responsible for significant worldwide Gastric Cancer (GC) related mortality. The present study aimed to screen all the anti-microbial drugs used to eradicate H .pylori infection and to identify the most efficient drug by using computational methods through molecular docking analysis. The 3-D structure of protein chorismate synthase of H. pylori was downloaded from the Protein data bank (PDB) online browser. The x-ray crystallography structures of 13 common drugs used against H.pylori infection were also downloaded from the drug bank. We screened all 13 common drugs through molecular docking to know the most efficient binding interaction between the diverse ligand-protein complexes. The results were further compared with clinical survey data from the patients with diverse gastrointestinal H. pylori infected cases. Among the screened compounds, by in-silico approach we found that fluoroquinolone (FLRQ) and tetracycline (TET) manifested more significant interactions with chorismate synthase (CS) protein along with binding energies of -9.2 and -8.1 kcal/mole respectively. Further, the drugs were also corroborated with the survey data from patients with varied gastrointestinal disorders in our study. With this computational study, we could find FLRQ and TET may be the most efficient drug for H. pylori treatment, which can be tried in case of anti H. Pylori treatment failure due to resistance. Hence, effective inter-analysis between the experimental and computational approaches is crucial to build up a strong inhibitor.

Proton-pump inhibitor and amoxicillin-based triple therapy containing clarithromycin versus metronidazole for Helicobacter pylori: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is one of the important risk factors of gastric related diseases and antibiotic therapy has become an effective treatment. At present, proton-pump inhibitor and amoxicillin-based triple therapy, including clarithromycin (PAC) and metronidazole (PAM), are two commonly used first-line therapies for H. pylori infection, which has a high incidence and possibly poor prognosis worldwide.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the databases PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Science Direct, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Only randomized clinical trials with full texts published were included.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving 3264 patients were included. The pooled risk ratios (RR) between the PAC and PAM groups were comparable in the intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates (71.0% versus 75.2%, RR = 0.96, p = 0.38) and per-protocol (PP) eradication rates (79.6% versus 80.1%, RR = 1.02, p = 0.65). PAM is highly effective in clarithromycin-resistant cases (70.4% versus 48.2%, RR = 0.65, p = 0.002) and that PAC showed significant efficacy in metronidazole-resistant cases (87.3% versus 58.6%, RR = 1.43, p = 0.0006). In subgroup analysis, when using low-dose PPI, the PAM group showed greater efficacy than the PAC group. Furthermore, we found that PAM showed higher effectiveness in the studies published in recent years, especially for people over 60 years old (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In general, both PAC and PAM regimens were effective and comparable in eradicating H. pylori. However, the PAM regimen showed greater efficacy than the PAC regimen in recent years, especially for people over 60 years old.

[The Efficacy of Bismuth-containing Quadruple Therapy after Moxifloxacin-based Sequential Therapy Failure in Helicobacter pylori Eradication]

Background/Aims

Moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy showed an excellent eradication rate as the first line treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. However, to the best of our knowledge, there were only a few studies on the treatment of those with failed moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy. Hence, this study was to investigate the efficacy of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in those with failed moxifloxacin-based sequential or reverse sequential therapy for H. pylori eradication.

Methods

Between January 2013 and March 2016, we retrospectively analyzed patients who failed to eradicate H. pylori using moxifloxacin-based sequential (rabeprazole 20 mg bid and amoxicillin 1 g bid for 5-7 days, followed by rabeprazole 20 mg bid, metronidazole 500 mg bid, and moxifloxacin 400 mg qd for 5-7 days) and 10 days moxifloxacin-based reverse sequential therapy as the first line treatment. Then we investigated the eradication rates of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as the second line treatment. All subjects had no history of H. pylori eradication before. Eradication rates were described as intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. H. pylori status was evaluated by ¹³C-urea breath test 6 weeks after the end of the treatment. Moreover, we examined any side effects that caused discontinuation of therapy.

Results

Twenty-three patients received bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as the second line treatment. The overall eradication rates by ITT and PP analyses were 60.87% (n=14/23) and 73.68% (n=14/19). All the patients showed good compliance, and there were no serious adverse events.

Conclusions

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy is insufficient as the second line eradication treatment after a failed attempt of moxifloxacin-based sequential or reverse sequential therapy. Large-scale clinical trials should be performed to establish better clinical evidence.

[The Efficacy of Moxifloxacin-containing Triple Therapy after Hybrid Therapy Failure in Helicobacter pylori Eradication]

Background/Aims

Hybrid therapy was successful in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) according to previous reports. However, to the best of our knowledge, there have only been a few studies evaluating the optimal choice after hybrid failure. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy after hybrid therapy failure in H. pylori eradication.

Methods

Between January 2013 and March 2016, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent failed hybrid therapy, as first line treatment, in eradicating H. pylori (rabeprazole and amoxicillin b.i.d for 14 days, in addition to clarithromycin and metronidazole b.i.d for final 7 days). Then, we investigated the eradication rates of moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy (rabeprazole, amoxicillin b.i.d and moxifloxacin qd) as the second line of treatment. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were used to determine the eradication rate. We evaluated the status of H. pylori by using ¹³C-urea breath test 6 weeks after the final treatment. Moreover, compliance and adverse effects of each patient were analyzed.

Results

Among those who failed the initial hybrid therapy, 11 patients received moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy. The overall eradication rates, as determined by ITT and PP, were 72.7% (n=8/11) and 80% (n=8/10), respectively. The compliance rate was 100%, and there were no serious adverse effects.

Conclusions

Moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy can be used as a second line therapy in case of hybrid therapy failure. A large scale study is necessary to confirm the findings of this study and establish clinical evidence.

Real-world practice and Expectation of Asia-Pacific physicians and patients in Helicobacter Pylori eradication (REAP-HP Survey)

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the study were: 1, to survey the most popular anti-H. pylori regimens in Asia-Pacific region and the real-world effectiveness of these regimens; and 2, to investigate the expectation gaps of eradication rate between physicians and patients.

DESIGN

A questionnaire was distributed to Asia-Pacific physicians who attended the Asia-Pacific Digestive Week 2015 meeting. Reported eradication rates from the literatures were compared with real-world rates of surveyed popular regimens within the region. In addition, a questionnaire was distributed to H. pylori-infected patients in three regions of Taiwan.

RESULTS

A total of 691 physicians and 539 patients participated in the survey. The top five most commonly used regimens were 7-day clarithromycin-based standard triple therapy (50.4%), 14-day clarithromycin-based standard triple therapy (31.0%), 10-day sequential therapy (6.1%), 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy (3.9%), and 14-day hybrid therapy (3.6%). All countries except for China had a significant gap between the expectation of physicians on anti-H. pylori therapy and the real-world eradication rate of most commonly adopted regimens (all P value <.05). The expectation on minimal eradication rate among patients was higher than that of physicians (91.4% vs 86.5%, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

It is time for physicians in Asia-Pacific countries to adopt newer and more efficacious anti-H. pylori regimens to meet the Kyoto consensus recommendation and their patients' expectations.

Anti-Helicobacter pylori Activity of Isocoumarin Paepalantine: Morphological and Molecular Docking Analysis

The Helicobacterpylori bacterium is one of the main causes of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcers, and even gastric cancer. It affects an average of half of the world population. Its difficult eradication depends upon multi-drug therapy. Since its classification as a group 1 carcinogenic by International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the importance of H. pylori eradication has obtained a novel meaning. There is considerable interest in alternative therapies for the eradication of H. pylori using compounds from a wide range of natural products. In the present study, we investigated the antibacterial property of the isocoumarin paepalantine against H. pylori and it exhibited significant anti-H. pylori activity at a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 128 μg/mL and at a minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 256 μg/mL. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed significant morphological changes of the bacterial cell as a response to a sub-MIC of paepalantine, suggesting a penicillin-binding protein (PBP) inhibition. Computational studies were carried out in order to study binding modes for paepalantine in PBP binding sites, exploring the active and allosteric sites. The data from the present study indicates that paepalantine exhibits significant anti-H. pylori activity, most likely by inhibiting membrane protein synthesis.

Effects of patient age and choice of antisecretory agent on success of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

The effects of patient age on the efficacy of eradication treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) remain unclear. The present study aimed to determine whether age affects eradication therapy involving vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB). We reviewed the cases of 3,261 patients who were administered first-line and second-line H. pylori eradication therapy at Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic. The first-line treatment was clarithromycin and amoxicillin combined with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or a PCAB. The second-line treatment was metronidazole and amoxicillin combined with a PPI or PCAB. The patients were divided into a young to middle-aged group (age ≤50 years) and an older group (age >50 years) as well as into PPI and PCAB groups. The PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin regimen demonstrated a significantly lower H. pylori eradication rate than the PCAB-clarithromycin-amoxicillin regimen (p<0.001). With the PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin regimen, the eradication rate in the young to middle-aged group was significantly lower than that in the older group (p<0.001). Lastly, age had no impact on the eradication rate of PCAB-based therapy or metronidazole-based therapy. In conclusion, with clarithromycin-based triple therapy, PCAB is a better choice of antisecretory agent compared to PPIs, especially in young to middle-aged patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: triple therapy combining a proton-pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and metronidazole for Helicobacter pylori first-line treatment

BACKGROUND

Due to clarithromycin resistance, the current efficacy of Helicobacter pylori first-line triple therapies including clarithromycin is low. It seems reasonable to explore alternative clarithromycin-free therapies.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy including a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and metronidazole (PAM) as first-line H. pylori therapy by systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies evaluating PAM in adult patients were included. Meta-analyses comparing PAM with other treatments were performed. The primary endpoint was the ITT eradication rate for H. pylori first-line treatment. In addition, sensitivity analyses ascertained the effects of treatment schedule, dosage and duration on cure rates.

RESULTS

Ninety-four studies (8061 patients) were included. Meta-analyses comparing PAM versus clarithromycin-including triple therapies showed a significant difference in favour of PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (PAC) (70% versus 77.1%; OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.56-0.88) and PPI, metronidazole and clarithromycin (PMC) therapy (66.4% versus 77.7%; OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.39-0.76). Sensitivity analyses showed a similar efficacy of PAM versus PAC when drugs were administered for 14 days (80% versus 84%; OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.44-1.12). There were not enough studies to perform further comparisons. Number of antibiotic doses (P = 0.012), length of treatment (P < 0.001) and use of high metronidazole doses (P = 0.021) were related to higher cure rates in the sensitivity analysis including observational studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PAM was less efficacious than clarithromycin-including triple therapies. However, its efficacy was similar to that of PAC when drugs were administered for 14 days, although ITT cure rates did not reach 90%. Use of 14 day, thrice daily and high-metronidazole-dose PAM treatments markedly increased the cure rate.

Esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-based triple therapy eradicated Helicobacter pylori comparably regardless of clarithromycin susceptibility and CYP2C19 genotypes

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of esomeprazole-based triple therapy compared with rabeprazole-based triple therapy according to CYP2C19 genotype and clarithromycin susceptibility status for first-line eradication therapy of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in Japan. We enrolled 219 H. pylori-infected patients, and randomly allocated patients to the EAC group (esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 200 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg for one week, with all drugs given twice daily) or RAC group (rabeprazole 10 mg, clarithromycin 200 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg for one week, with all drugs given twice daily). The H. pylori eradication rate according to the PP analyses was 75.0% (95% CI: 65.2–82.8%) in the EAC group and 71.4% (95% CI: 61.4–79.1%) in the RAC group. There were no statistically significant differences. The eradication rates of the clarithromycin-resistant/-sensitive strains were, respectively, 45.0% (95% CI: 30.7–60.2%)/98.0% (95% CI: 88.7–100%) in the EAC group and 39.5% (95% CI: 25.6–55.3%)/93.5% (95% CI: 81.9–98.4%) in the RAC group. The eradication rate of the clarithromycin-sensitive strains was significantly higher than that of the resistant strains in both groups. In conclusion, EAC and RAC therapies show a comparable efficacy regardless of the CYP2C19 genotype and clarithromycin susceptibility status in Japan.

Efficacy of the antimicrobial peptide TP4 against Helicobacter pylori infection: in vitro membrane perturbation via micellization and in vivo suppression of host immune responses in a mouse model

Helicobacter pylori infection is marked by a strong association with various gastric diseases, including gastritis, ulcers, and gastric cancer. Antibiotic treatment regimens have low success rates due to the rapid occurrence of resistant H. pylori strains, necessitating the development of novel anti-H. pylori strategies. Here, we investigated the therapeutic potential of a novel peptide, Tilapia Piscidin 4 (TP4), against multidrug resistant gastric pathogen H. pylori, based on its in vitro and in vivo efficacy.TP4 inhibited the growth of both antibiotic-sensitive and -resistant H. pylori (CagA+, VacA+) via membrane micelle formation, which led to membrane depolarization and extravasation of cellular constituents. During colonization of gastric tissue, H. pylori infection maintains high T regulatory subsets and a low Th17/Treg ratio, and results in expression of both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Treatment with TP4 suppressed Treg subset populations and pro- and anti- inflammatory cytokines. TP4 restored the Th17/Treg balance, which resulted in early clearance of H. pylori density and recovery of gastric morphology. Toxicity studies demonstrated that TP4 treatment has no adverse effects in mice or rabbits. The results of this study indicate that TP4 may be an effective and safe monotherapeutic agent for the treatment of multidrug resistant H. pylori infections.

Helicobacter pylori in gastric carcinogenesis

Gastric cancer still is a major concern as the third most common cancer worldwide, despite declining rates of incidence in many Western countries. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the major cause of gastric carcinogenesis, and its infection insults gastric mucosa leading to the occurrence of atrophic gastritis which progress to intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, early gastric cancer, and advanced gastric cancer consequently. This review focuses on multiple factors including microbial virulence factors, host genetic factors, and environmental factors, which can heighten the chance of occurrence of gastric adenocarcinoma due to H. pylori infection. Bacterial virulence factors are key components in controlling the immune response associated with the induction of carcinogenesis, and cagA and vacA are the most well-known pathogenic factors. Host genetic polymorphisms contribute to regulating the inflammatory response to H. pylori and will become increasingly important with advancing techniques. Environmental factors such as high salt and smoking may also play a role in gastric carcinogenesis. It is important to understand the virulence factors, host genetic factors, and environmental factors interacting in the multistep process of gastric carcinogenesis. To conclude, prevention via H. pylori eradication and controlling environmental factors such as diet, smoking, and alcohol is an important strategy to avoid H. pylori-associated gastric carcinogenesis.

Antibiotic treatment for Helicobacter pylori: Is the end coming?

Infection with the Gram-negative pathogen Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has been associated with gastro-duodenal disease and the importance of H. pylori eradication is underscored by its designation as a group I carcinogen. The standard triple therapy consists of a proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin, although many other regimens are used, including quadruple, sequential and concomitant therapy regimens supplemented with metronidazole, clarithromycin and levofloxacin. Despite these efforts, current therapeutic regimens lack efficacy in eradication due to antibiotic resistance, drug compliance and antibiotic degradation by the acidic stomach environment. Antibiotic resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole is particularly problematic and several approaches have been proposed to overcome this issue, such as complementary probiotic therapy with Lactobacillus. Other studies have identified novel molecules with an anti-H. pylori effect, as well as tailored therapy and nanotechnology as viable alternative eradication strategies. This review discusses current antibiotic therapy for H. pylori infections, limitations of this type of therapy and predicts the availability of newly developed therapies for H. pylori eradication.

Clarithromycin Versus Metronidazole as First-line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication rates achieved with a first-line regimen of clarithromycin (CLR) combined with amoxicillin (AMX) and a proton pump inhibitor have recently fallen to ≤80% because of the increasing incidence of CLR resistance in Japan. This randomized multicenter trial aimed to compare the eradication success of 2 first-line triple therapy regimens: rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (RAC) versus rabeprazole, amoxicillin, and metronidazole (RAM).

METHODS

A total of 124 consecutive patients infected with H. pylori were randomized into one of two 7-day therapeutic regimens: RAC (n=60) or RAM (n=64). Eradication was confirmed by the C-urea breath test. Adverse effects were also assessed.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat and per protocol H. pylori eradication rates were 73.3%/77.2% in the RAC group and 90.6%/93.5% in the RAM group. The eradication rate of RAM therapy was significantly higher than that of RAC therapy. CLR, metronidazole, and AMX resistance was found in 36.2%, 2.1%, and 0% of patients, respectively. In addition, no relevant differences in adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Metronidazole-based therapy (RAM) was superior to standard CLR-based therapy (RAC) for first-line H. pylori eradication. This reflects the progressive increase in CLR resistance observed in Japan.

Effect of supplementation with rebamipide for Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Several studies have reported that the application of rebamipide during the eradication of Helicobacter pylori can improve the eradication rate. However, the efficacy and safety are controversial. The present study systematically evaluated whether rebamipide improves the eradication rate of H. pylori by conducting a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in the following database: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the Igaku-chuo-zasshi database in Japan. A meta-analysis of all RCTs comparing rebamipide supplementation with non-rebamipide-containing therapy was performed.

RESULTS

We identified six randomized trials (611 patients). Pooled H. pylori eradication rates by per-protocol analysis were 73.3% and 61.4% for patients with or without rebamipide, respectively. The odds ratio was 1.74 (95% confidence interval. 1.19-2.53).

CONCLUSIONS

Supplementation with rebamipide might be effective in increasing the H. pylori eradication rates of proton-pump inhibitor-amoxicillin dual therapy.

Current Paradigm and Future Directions for Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection

OPINION STATEMENT

Once easily eradicated with triple or quadruple therapy, Helicobacter pylori infection has become increasingly resistant to traditional first-line treatment regimens because of emerging antibiotic resistance coupled with poor patient compliance with completing the treatment course. Given decreasing H. pylori eradication rates, there is considerable interest in evaluating new antibiotic combinations and regimens, the addition of probiotics, and the development of new paradigms such as concomitant, sequential, and hybrid medication dosing strategies. Unfortunately, efforts thus far have not universally improved treatment responses, as promising early results were often not extrapolated to wider populations. This is probably due largely to regional variation in H. pylori resistance patterns. Ideally, the standard of care should be dictated by knowledge of local H. pylori antimicrobial resistance patterns and clinical success rates rather than by empiric extrapolation from the literature. Unfortunately, such knowledge is usually lacking in the USA. The expectation of a first-line regimen is a minimum 80 % eradication rate in the local population. Standard triple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and clarithromycin may still be effective in some areas; however, in populations with high clarithromycin resistance, quadruple therapy with a metronidazole-based regimen may be a better choice, and concomitant, sequential, or hybrid dosing schedules should also be considered as possible first-line choices. Second- and third-line treatment regimens consist of levofloxacin-based and rifabutin-based therapies, respectively. Further work should be directed at establishing local resistance patterns and eradication rates, developing H. pylori-specific antibiotics, and starting culture-guided treatment programs. Ultimately, the development of an H. pylori vaccine would bypass any issues with antibiotic resistance by preventing the acquisition of infection altogether.

Efficacy of lansoprazole combined with conventional treatment in relieving gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with anxiety

AIM: To explore the efficacy of lansoprazole combined with conventional treatment in relieving gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with anxiety.

METHODS: One hundred and eighteen anxiety patients with gastrointestinal symptoms treated from January 2011 to March 2014 at our hospital were randomly divided into either a treatment group or a control group, with 59 cases in each groups. The control group was given conventional treatment and symptomatic treatment for gastrointestinal symptoms, and the treatment group was given oral lansoprazole tablets on the basis of the treatments in the control group. Esophageal pH value (EpH), esophageal pressure (LESP), duration of symptoms, number of fecal occult blood positive cases, numbers of cases of postprandial fullness, acid reflux, belching and irregular abdominal pain, and drug adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and 6 wk after treatment.

RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in EpH, LESP, number of fecal occult blood positive cases, or numbers of cases of postprandial fullness, acid reflux, belching and irregular abdominal pain between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). The EpH (5.68 ± 1.52 vs 4.98 ± 1.47) and LESP (12.46 mmHg ± 4.29 mmHg vs 9.76 mmHg ± 3.17 mmHg) were significantly higher, and the duration of symptoms, number of fecal occult blood positive cases, numbers of cases of postprandial fullness, acid reflux, belching, and irregular abdominal pain were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group 6 wk after treatment (P < 0.05). The numbers of cases of persistent abdominal pain, diarrhea, anemia and vomiting blood or bloody stool were also significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Lansoprazole combined with conventional treatment can significantly reduce the extent and duration of symptoms and the incidence of gastrointestinal complications in anxiety patients with gastrointestinal symptoms.

[Future trends of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in Korea]

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea shows a decreasing trend and has changed to that of developed country, especially for those below 30 years old. However, the primary antibiotic resistance rates are higher than those of developed countries. The reason for the decrease in the efficacy of standard triple therapy is mainly due to the increase in the resistance against clarithromycin. Sequential therapy seems to be more effective than the standard triple therapy, but the intention-to-treat eradication rate of sequential therapy in Korea, which is mostly under 80.0%, is still not satisfactory. Therefore, a promising regimen is needed. Recently, the Japanese health insurance system admitted 'H. pylori-infected gastritis'as an indication of eradication. Furthermore, the Kyoto Consensus Meeting on H. pylori Gastritis held from January 30th to February 1st, 2014, proposed that 'all H. pylori positive patients should be offered to receive H. pylori eradication'. This suggests that the concept of eradication has been changed from 'treatment' to 'prevention'. Various individualized tailored therapy based on the polymorphism, age and other demographic factors and antibiotic resistance has been attempted to maximize H. pylori eradication therapy. The aim of this article is to review the current epidemiology, H. pylori resistance state, treatment guideline, and to assess the possible future strategy and treatment for H. pylori infection in Korea.

Approach to Helicobacter pylori infection in geriatric population

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and its complications increase with age. The majority of infected individuals remain asymptomatic throughout the life but 10%-20% develops peptic ulcer disease and 1% gastric malignancies. The incidence of ulcers and their complications are more common in the older population resulting in higher hospitalization and mortality rates. The increased use of medications causing gastric mucosal damage and the decreased secretion of protective prostaglandins in elderly are major factors increasing gastric mucosal sensitivity to the destructive effects of H. pylori. Due to higher prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, upper GI endoscopy is mostly preferred in elderly for the diagnosis of infection. Therefore, “endoscopy and treat” strategy may be more appropriate instead of “test and treat” strategy for dyspeptic patients in older age. Urea breath test and stool antigen test can be used for control of eradication, except for special cases requiring follow-up with endoscopy. The indications for treatment and suggested eradication regimens are similar with other age groups; however, the eradication failure may be a more significant problem due to high antibiotic resistance and low compliance rate in elderly. Multidrug usage and drug interactions should always be considered before starting the treatment. This paper reviews briefly the epidemiology, diagnosis, disease manifestations, and treatment options of H. pylori in the geriatric population.

Detection of genotypic clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori by string tests

AIM

To evaluate the utility of the string test to detect genotypic clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism.

METHODS

Patients undergoing endoscopic examinations were enrolled in the present study. String tests were done on the next day of endoscopy. Segments of 23S rRNA were amplified from DNA obtained from string tests. PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism was accomplished by restriction enzymes BbsI and BsaI recognizing the mutation site A to G at 2143 or at 2142 of 23S rRNA domain V, respectively.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four patients with H. pylori infection underwent string tests. To compare phenotypic resistance, 43 isolates were successfully cultured in 79 patients in whom 23S rRNA was successfully amplified. Of five patients with clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori, 23S rRNA of H. pylori isolates from four patients could be digested by BsaI. In 38 susceptible isolates, 23S rRNA of H. pylori isolates from 36 patients could not be digested by either BsaI or BbsI. The sensitivity and specificity of the string test to detect genotypic clarithromycin resistance were 66.7% and 97.3%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 80% and 94.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

String test with molecular analysis is a less invasive method to detect genotypic resistance before treatment. Further large-scale investigations are necessary to confirm our results.

Molecular approaches and modern clinical strategies for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan

Thirty years have passed since Warren and Marshall's discovery of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Since then, not only peptic ulcer diseases and chronic gastritis but also non-cardia gastric cancers have been recognized as diseases originating from H. pylori infection. Several combination therapies consisting of multiple antibiotics have been developed as first- or second-line regimens to eradicate H. pylori infection. Our extensive experience in the field of anti-H. pylori medicine suggests that clinicians should consider a possible role for unidentified, invisible pathogens to elucidate the pathogenesis and improve the treatment of refractory diseases of unknown etiology.

Delay of second-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori can increase eradication failure

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The interval between first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment and second-line treatment may be critical to the second-line therapeutic effect. We attempted to assess the association between the second-line eradication rates and the treatment interval.

METHODS

Data of patients, who were administered the second-line H. pylori eradication regimen at Tokyo Medical Center between 2008 and 2012, were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 148 patients enrolled, one patient dropped out. The eradication rates were 88.6% (intention-to-treat [ITT]) and 89.3% (per-protocol [PP]) for early eradication group (eradication interval < 180 days, patients number 132) and 68.8% (ITT and PP) for delayed eradication group (eradication interval ≥ 180 days, patients number 16). The eradication rate in the delayed eradication group was significantly lower than in the early eradication group (P = 0.027 [ITT] and 0.021 [PP]). The eradication interval in the subjects showing eradication failure (124.0 ± 96.8 days, patients number 19) was significantly longer than those showing successful eradication (85.8 ± 56.9 days, patients number 128, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the delay of second-line treatment should be avoided.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection 2013

This review summarizes important studies regarding Helicobacter pylori therapy published from April 2012 up to March 2013. To begin with, the updated European Consensus Guidelines were published last year, highlighting the role of bismuth and nonbismuth quadruple regimen as first-line treatments. Cure rates for standard triple therapy remain acceptable in quite a few settings nowadays, and some reports on innovative triple therapies look promising. One study evaluating bismuth quadruple therapy as first-line therapy was reported. Regarding nonbismuth quadruple regimens, there is a trend of superiority emerging for the "concomitant" therapy over the "sequential" regimen. "Hybrid" therapy, a combination of sequential and concomitant therapy, has also shown advantage over sequential therapy. Levofloxacin-based therapies appear to be useful and versatile in second- and third-line therapies, with interesting results for newer generation quinolones, which may partially overcome antibiotic resistance. Some promising works have been reported for bismuth-based rescue therapy, using individualized therapies upon antimicrobial information, as well as for rifabutin fourth-line therapy. Probiotics appear to have an effect in terms of reducing side effects and improving compliance, but data on improvement of eradication rates remain controversial.

Sequential therapy versus standard triple-drug therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

Eradication rates following standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection are declining. Recent studies, conducted in a number of countries, have shown that sequential therapy for H. pylori infection yields high cure rates.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a sequential regimen as a first-line treatment of H. pylori infection with a standard triple treatment regime in Morocco.

METHODS

A total of 281 naive H. pylori-infected patients, confirmed by histological examination, were assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups: standard triple therapy [omeprazole (20 mg bid) + amoxicillin (1 g bid) + clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for 7 days] or sequential therapy [omeprazole (20 mg bid) + amoxicillin (1 g bid) for 5 days, followed by omeprazole (20 mg bid) + tinidazole (500 mg bid) + clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for an additional 5 days]. H. pylori eradication was checked 4-6 weeks after treatment initiation by using a ¹³C-urea breath test. Compliance and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

The two groups did not differ significantly in gender, age, previous disease history, endoscopic and histological features and smoking. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were 65.9 and 71 % in the standard triple therapy group, and 82.8 and 89.9 % in the sequential therapy group, respectively. The eradication rate was significantly higher in the sequential therapy group than in the standard triple therapy group (p < 0.001), There was no statistically significant difference in compliance (97.5 vs. 96.3 %) and incidence of side-effects (27.5 vs. 27.9 %) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, we conclude that for eradication of H. pylori infection, the 10-day sequential therapy is more effective than the standard triple therapy and is equally tolerated. These results confirm those of other studies in other countries.

Sequential therapy versus standard triple-drug therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

Eradication rates following standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection are declining. Recent studies, conducted in a number of countries, have shown that sequential therapy for H. pylori infection yields high cure rates.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a sequential regimen as a first-line treatment of H. pylori infection with a standard triple treatment regime in Morocco.

METHODS

A total of 281 naive H. pylori-infected patients, confirmed by histological examination, were assigned randomly to one of two treatment groups: standard triple therapy [omeprazole (20 mg bid) + amoxicillin (1 g bid) + clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for 7 days] or sequential therapy [omeprazole (20 mg bid) + amoxicillin (1 g bid) for 5 days, followed by omeprazole (20 mg bid) + tinidazole (500 mg bid) + clarithromycin (500 mg bid) for an additional 5 days]. H. pylori eradication was checked 4-6 weeks after treatment initiation by using a ¹³C-urea breath test. Compliance and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

The two groups did not differ significantly in gender, age, previous disease history, endoscopic and histological features and smoking. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were 65.9 and 71 % in the standard triple therapy group, and 82.8 and 89.9 % in the sequential therapy group, respectively. The eradication rate was significantly higher in the sequential therapy group than in the standard triple therapy group (p < 0.001), There was no statistically significant difference in compliance (97.5 vs. 96.3 %) and incidence of side-effects (27.5 vs. 27.9 %) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, we conclude that for eradication of H. pylori infection, the 10-day sequential therapy is more effective than the standard triple therapy and is equally tolerated. These results confirm those of other studies in other countries.

Improvement of reflux symptom related quality of life after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

The relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication therapy and the risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is controversial. We investigated the influence of H. pylori eradication on the risk of GERD by focusing on the quality of life (QOL) and evaluating reflux symptoms. Patients with H. pylori infection were administered triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. At 3 months and 1 year after the eradication therapy, surveys were conducted to determine the health-related QOL by quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia-Japanese version, (QOLRAD-J) and the severity of GERD symptoms by Carlsson-Dent questionnaire (CDQ). Forty patients were included in the analysis. Although no significant changes of these scores were apparent 3 months after H. pylori eradication, the QOLRAD-J and CDQ scores were significantly improved after 1 year. The degree of improvement was even more marked in cases with initially low scores. In conclusion, improved GERD-related QOL and reflux symptoms were noted 1 year after H. pylori eradication therapy. In addition, the degree of improvement was more marked in cases with severe reflux symptoms.