Assessing bioavailability of ruminally protected methionine and lysine prototypes

Measuring bioavailability, utilization, and excretion of rumen-protected lysine in lactating cows using an isotope technique

Supplementing a diet with rumen-protected amino acids (AAs) is a common feeding strategy for efficient production. For a cost-effective use of rumen-protected AA, the accurate bioavailability of rumen-protected amino acids should be known and their metabolism after absorption needs to be well understood. The current study determined the bioavailability, absorption, utilization, and excretion of rumen-protected Lys (RP-Lys). Four ruminally cannulated cows in a 4 × 4 Latin square design (12 d for diet adaptation; 5 or 6 d for total collections) received the following treatments: L0, a basal diet; L25, the basal diet and L-Lys infused into the abomasum to provide 25.9 g/d L-Lys; L50, the basal diet and L-Lys infused into the abomasum to provide 51.8 g/d L-Lys; and RPL, the basal diet supplemented with 105 g/d (as-is) of RP-Lys to provide 26.7 g of digestible Lys. During the last 5 or 6 d in each period, 15N-Lys (0.38 g/d) was infused into the abomasum for all cows to label the pool of AA, and the total collection of milk, urine, and feces were conducted. 15N enrichment of samples on d 4 and 5 were used to calculate the bioavailability and Lys metabolism. We used a model containing a fast AA turnover (≤ 5 d) and slow AA turnover pool (> 5 d) to calculate fluxes of Lys. The Lys flux to the fast AA turnover pool (absorbed Lys + Lys from the slow AA turnover pool to fast AA turnover pool) was calculated using 15N enrichment of milk Lys. The flux of Lys from the fast AA turnover pool to milk and urine was calculated using 15N transfer into milk and urine. Then, absorbed Lys was estimated by the sum of Lys flux to milk and urine assuming no net utilization of Lys by body tissues. Duodenal Lys flow was estimated by 15N enrichment of fecal Lys. The bioavailability of RP-Lys was calculated from duodenal Lys flows and Lys absorption for RPL. Increasing Lys supply from L25 to L50 increased Lys utilization for milk by 9 g/d but also increased urinary excretion by 10 g/d. For RPL, absorbed Lys was estimated to be 136 g/d where 28 g of absorbed Lys originated from RP-Lys. In conclusion, 68% of bioavailability was obtained for RP-Lys. The Lys provided from RP-Lys was not only utilized for milk protein (48%) but also excreted in urine (20%) after oxidation.

Effects of Rumen-Protected Methionine Supplementation on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestion, Nitrogen Utilisation and Plasma Amino Acid Profiles of Liaoning Cashmere Goats

This study determined the effects of rumen-protected methionine (RPM) supplementation on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen (N) utilisation and plasma amino acid profiles of Liaoning cashmere goats during cashmere fibre growth. Twenty-four yearling male cashmere goats (body weight: 35.41 ± 1.13 kg) were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments: a corn-soybean meal basal diet deficient in methionine (negative control, NC) and a basal diet supplemented with 1, 2 and 3 g/kg of RPM. The RPM supplementation quadratically increased the average daily gain (ADG) and decreased the feed to gain ratio (p = 0.001) without affecting the final body weight and dry matter intake. In particular, compared to NC, 2 g/kg RPM supplementation increased the ADG by 35 g/d (p < 0.001) and resulted in the lowest feed to gain ratio (p < 0.001). RPM increased the apparent total tract digestibility of N and decreased the faecal N levels, both in a linear fashion (p = 0.005). Urinary N levels did not have an effect, but the N retention levels increased linearly with PRM (p = 0.032). Moreover, the RPM decreased the plasma urea N levels (p < 0.001) and increased the plasma Met levels quadratically (p < 0.001). In conclusion, RPM supplementation in the diet of cashmere goats can enhance the utilisation of N and improve ADG during the cashmere fibre growing period, and 2 g/kg of RPM in the diet is suggested.

One-carbon metabolism and related pathways in ruminal and small intestinal epithelium of lactating dairy cows

Physiological and environmental stresses such as the transition into lactation and heat load contribute to gastrointestinal tract (GIT) dysfunction. The nonruminant gastrointestinal tract has mechanisms to cope with pro-oxidant and pro-inflammatory stressors arising from the gut lumen or within intestinal cells. One-carbon metabolism (OCM) contributes to anti-oxidant capacity via the production of glutathione (GSH) and taurine, and the synthesis of phospholipid, creatine, and the osmolyte glycinebetaine among others. A multipronged approach was used to assess the biological relevance of OCM and closely-related pathways on GIT function in dairy cows. Ruminal papillae (Rum) and scrapings from duodenum (Duo), jejunum (Jej), and ileum (Ile) were collected at slaughter from eight multiparous Holstein cows averaging 128 ± 12 d in milk and producing 39 ± 5 kg/d. A MIXED model ANOVA with preplanned orthogonal contrasts was used for statistical analysis. Methionine adenosyl transferase 1 activity (MAT) was ~10-fold greater (P < 0.01) and cystathionine β-synthase activity doubled in Rum vs. small intestine. Total glutathione peroxidase (GPX) activity was greatest (P = 0.03) in Ile, but similar to Rum. Activity and mRNA abundance of betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase were undetectable. There was a 2.5-fold greater protein abundance of GPX1 (P < 0.01) and a ~2-fold greater abundance of GPX3 (P < 0.01) in Rum vs. small intestine. Among the various amino acids (AA) with roles in OCM or closely-related pathways (e.g. creatine synthesis), concentrations of arginine, aspartate, glutamine, methionine, and serine were lower (P < 0.01) in Rum vs. small intestine. Unlike AA, concentrations of OCM-related intermediates S-5'-adenosyl-homocysteine (SAH), glycinebetaine, carnitine, creatine (CRE), and cysteinesulfinic acid were greater (P < 0.01) while taurine was lower in Rum vs. small intestine. Intermediates of the folate cycle were undetectable. The fact that S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) was undetectable while MAT activity and SAH were greater in Rum suggested that availability of SAM (a methyl donor) is a key determinant of flux through the folate and methionine cycles in the GIT. Except for adenosine, concentrations of glutamate, glycine, α-ketoglutarate, hypotaurine, and GSH were lowest in Ile. Together, the data underscored unique differences in activity of one-carbon metabolism and related pathways across sections of the GIT.

An evaluation of the validity of an in vitro and an in situ/in vitro procedure for assessing protein digestibility of blood meal, feather meal and a rumen-protected lysine prototype

In vitro procedures are commonly used to estimate rumen protein degradability and protein digestibility of feed ingredients. However, it is unclear how well these assays correlate to in vivo data. The objectives of this work were to compare postruminal protein availability estimates from one in vitro procedure and one in situ/in vitro procedure with in vivo observations for blood meal (BM), feather meal (FM), and a rumen-protected lysine prototype (RP-Lys). The FM and BM used for this experiment were subsamples of material assessed in vivo by an isotope-based method and the RP-Lys subsamples were of a prototype tested in two in vivo trials: a lactation trial and by plasma appearance. Subsamples of the BM (n = 14) and the FM (n = 22) were sent to each of three different laboratories for in vitro or in situ/in vitro analysis of crude protein (CP) and determination of rumen undegraded protein (RUP) and digested RUP (dRUP). Subsamples of the RP-Lys (n = 5) were sent to one laboratory for in vitro analysis of CP, RUP, and dRUP. Two diets containing BM or FM were assessed using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) v6.55 with ingredient inputs derived from either the CNCPS feed library, the isotope dilution method, or an average of the in vitro results from the three laboratories to determine how much the differences among estimates affected ingredient values. In vitro dRUP estimates for BM from one laboratory closely matched those determined in vivo (66.7% vs. 61.2%, respectively), but no in vitro estimates for FM matched the in vivo values. Surprisingly, there were significant differences in protein digestibility estimates from the modified three-step procedure across the two laboratories for BM (P < 0.0001) and for FM (P < 0.0001) indicating significant variation among laboratories in application of the method. Within all laboratories, BM estimates were reported in a narrow range (CV values of 2.6 or less). However, when testing multiple samples of FM or the RP-Lys prototype, CV values within a laboratory ranged up to 11 and 34, respectively. For the RP-Lys, dRUP estimates from the in vitro method were roughly half of that determined by the in vivo methods suggesting poor concordance between the in vitro and in vivo procedures for this ingredient. The inconsistencies within and among laboratories accompanied with dissimilarities to in vivo data is problematic for application in nutrition models. Additional refinement to the in vitro techniques is warranted.

Plasma methionine appearance and residual potential of supplemented N-acetyl-L-methionine through ruminal or abomasal infusion in dairy cows

The present study investigated the plasma methionine (Met) and residual potential of N-acetyl-L-Met (NALM) in lactating dairy cows. Six cows (75 ± 20.1 days-in-milk) were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design. Within each square, cows were randomly assigned to a sequence of three dietary treatments during each of the three 13-day periods (10 days of treatment adaptation and 3 days of data collection and sampling). The three dietary treatments are as follows: basal diet without NALM (control); control diet with 30 g/day of NALM by rumen placement (30NALM), and control diet with 60 g/day of NALM by rumen placement (60NALM). Rumen NALM dosing led to a linear increase in plasma Met concentration. Abomasal infusion with NALM resulted in both linear and quadratic increases in plasma Met concentration. No NALM was detected in milk, liver, plasma, and muscle samples after rumen placement or abomasal infusion. Supplementation of NALM did not affect dry matter intake and milk yield. The absence of plasma NALM and increases in plasma Met concentration for both ruminal and abomasal NALM dosing suggest that NALM supplemented by either rumen placement or abomasal infusion to lactating dairy cows is deacetylated before entering the central circulation.

Rumen Bacterial Community of Grazing Lactating Yaks (Poephagus grunniens) Supplemented with Concentrate Feed and/or Rumen-Protected Lysine and Methionine

Simple Summary

Ruminal microorganisms, especially bacteria, play a vital role in utilizing fibrous material in ruminants. The yak is a bovid on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau that traditionally only grazes natural pasture all year. During lactation, energy intake of yaks is often well below requirements, and yaks lose body weight. Today, to mitigate body weight losses during lactation, suckling yaks are often offered supplementary feed. This study examined the effect of dietary supplements on rumen bacteria in lactating yak. The yaks were offered supplementary concentrate feed (C), rumen-protected Lys and Met (RPA), or both (RPA+C). The ratio of the relative abundance of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes in RPA+C was greater than in the RPA group, while there was no difference between C and RPA+C. The intakes of supplements resulted in a number of alterations in the abundances of bacteria at the genus level. When supplemented with C, yaks increased the concentration of ruminal total volatile fatty acids (VFAs), acetate, and butyrate. These results demonstrate that supplementary feed: (1) alters the composition of rumen microbiota and VFAs of lactating yaks; and (2) can be used to manipulate the composition of rumen microbiota.

Abstract

Traditionally, yaks graze only natural pasture all year round without supplements. Forage intake of lactating yaks is below energy and protein requirements, even in the summer, and suckling yaks lose a substantial amount of significant body weight. Today, to mitigate the loss in body weight, supplementary feed is being offered to lactating yaks. However, the effects of supplementary feed on ruminal bacterial communities in lactating yaks is unknown. In the current study, we examined the effect of supplementary feed on ruminal microbiota, using 16S rRNA sequencing, and on volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Twenty-four lactating yaks of similar body weight (218 ± 19.5 kg) and grazing natural pasture were divided randomly into four groups and received different supplements: (1) rumen-protected amino acids (RPA); (2) concentrate feed (C); (3) RPA plus C (RPA+C); and (4) no supplements (control-CON). The concentrations of total VFAs, acetate, and butyrate were greater (p < 0.05) when supplemented with concentrate feed (C and RPA+C) than without concentrate feed (CON and RPA). Bacteroidetes (B) and Firmicutes (F) were the dominant ruminal bacterial phyla in all groups. The ratio of relative abundance of F:B in RPA+C was greater than in the RPA group, while there was no difference between CON and RPC (interaction, p = 0.026). At the genus level, the relative abundances of Absconditabacteriales_SR1, Bacteroidales-RF16-group, Bacteroidales_BS11_gut_group, Prevotellaceae, and Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group were lesser (p < 0.05) with supplementary concentrate feed (C and RPA+C) than without concentrate feed (CON and RPA), whereas Butyrivibrio_2 and Pseudobutyrivibrio were greater (p < 0.05) with supplementary rumen-protected amino acids (RPA and RPA+C) than without rumen-protected amino acids (CON and C). These results demonstrate that supplementary feed: (1) alters the composition of rumen microbiota and concentrations of ruminal VFAs in lactating yaks; and (2) can be used to manipulate the composition of rumen microbiota.

Dietary fatty acid and starch content and supplemental lysine supply affect energy and nitrogen utilization in lactating Jersey cows

The effects of dietary fatty acid (FA) and starch content as well as supplemental digestible Lys (sdLys) on production, energy utilization, and N utilization were evaluated. Each factor was fed at 5 different amounts, and factor limits were as follows: 3.0 to 6.2% of dry matter (DM) for FA; 20.2 to 31.3% of DM for starch, and 0 to 17.8 g/d of sdLys. Dietary FA and starch were increased by replacing soyhulls with supplemental fat and corn grain, respectively, and sdLys increased with rumen-protected Lys. Fifteen unique treatments were fed to 25 Jersey cows (mean ± SD; 80 ± 14 d in milk) across 3 blocks in a partially balanced incomplete block design. Each block consisted of 4 periods of 28 d, where the final 4 d were used to determine milk production and composition, feed intake, energy utilization (via total collection and headbox-style indirect calorimetry), and N utilization (via total collection). Response surface models were used to evaluate treatment responses. Increasing dietary FA decreased DM intake and milk protein yield. When dietary starch was less than 24%, milk protein concentration increased with increasing sdLys, but when dietary starch was greater than 26% milk protein concentration decreased with increasing sdLys. Digestibility of FA increased when dietary FA increased from 3.0 to 4.2% and decreased as FA increased beyond 4.2%. Although neutral detergent fiber digestibility decreased as dietary starch increased, energy digestibility increased. As dietary FA increased, metabolizable energy (ME) content quadratically increased. Supply of ME increased as dietary FA increased from 3.0 to 4.2% and decreased as FA increased beyond 4.2%. Increasing dietary FA and starch decreased CH₄ production and urinary energy. Increasing dietary starch increased the efficiency of utilizing dietary N for milk N. Increasing sdLys quadratically decreased N balance as sdLys increased from 0 to 8 g/d and increased N balance as sdLys increased from 8 to 18 g/d. Increasing dietary FA can increase ME content, however, at high dietary FA, decreased DM intake and FA digestibility resulted in a plateau in ME content and a decrease in ME supply. Our results demonstrate that sdLys supply is important for milk protein when dietary starch is low, and some Lys may be preferentially used for muscle protein synthesis at the expense of milk protein when sdLys is high.

Histidine dose-response effects on lactational performance and plasma amino acid concentrations in lactating dairy cows: 1. Metabolizable protein-adequate diet

The objective of this experiment was to determine the effect of increasing digestible His (dHis) doses on milk production, milk composition, and plasma AA concentrations in lactating dairy cows fed diets that meet or exceed their energy and metabolizable protein (MP) requirements. In a companion paper (Räisänen et al., 2021) results are presented on the effect of increasing dHis dose with an MP-deficient basal diet. In this experiment, 16 Holstein cows (72 ± 15 d in milk) were used in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design experiment with four 28-d periods. Treatments were as follows: (1) control, total mixed ration (TMR) with 1.8% dHis of MP (TMR1; dHis1.8); (2) a different TMR with 2.2% dHis (TMR2; dHis2.2); (3) TMR2 supplemented with rumen-protected His (RP-His) to supply 2.6% dHis (dHis2.6); and (4) TMR2 supplemented with RP-His to supply 3.0% dHis of MP (dHis3.0). Estimated dHis intakes calculated at the end of the experiment were 46, 58, 69, and 79 g/d for dHis1.8, dHis2.2, dHis2.6, and dHis3.0, respectively. Contrasts were used to compare TMR1 with TMR2 and to test the linear and quadratic effects of RP-His inclusion rate on TMR2. We detected no effects of TMR or dHis dose on dry matter intake or milk yield, whereas energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield was quadratically increased, being greatest for cows on treatment dHis2.6. Milk true protein and lactose concentrations and milk true protein yield were not affected by TMR or dHis dose. Milk fat concentration and yield increased quadratically, and lactose yield tended to increase quadratically with increasing dHis dose. Calculated apparent efficiency of His utilization decreased quadratically with increasing dHis supply. Further, plasma concentration of His was greater for cows on TMR2 compared with TMR1. When an MP-adequate diet was fed to dairy cows, milk true protein concentration and yield were not affected by dHis supply, but milk fat and ECM yields of dairy cows were optimized at dHis supply of 69 g/d or 2.65% of MP.

Effects of rumen-protected methionine supplementation on the performance of high production dairy cows in the tropics

Increasing methionine availability in dairy cow diets during the first third of lactation may enhance their performance and health. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of supplementing rumen-protected methionine (Smartamine® M, SM) in a lactation diet with protein and energy levels calculated according to the literature. Seventy-six multiparous Holstein cows (39.1 ± 6.8 kg of milk/d and 65 ± 28 DIM) were assigned to 1 of 2 dietary treatments (38/treatment) according to a randomized complete block design with a 2-wk (covariate) and 10-wk experimental period. Treatments were a basal diet (CON; 3.77 Lys:1Met); and CON + 23 g SM (2.97 Lys:1 Met). Individual milk samples were taken every 2 weeks to determine milk composition. Blood was collected from 24 cows on d+30 d to measure plasma AA levels. Body weight and body condition score (BCS) were measured at the beginning and the end of the experiment. The SM diet promoted higher milk yield (41.7 vs. 40.1 kg/d; P = 0.03). Energy-corrected milk yield (41.0 vs. 38.0 kg/d), milk protein yield (1.30 vs. 1.18 kg/d), milk protein (3.14% vs. 2.97%) and casein (2.39% vs. 2.28%) were also different (P < 0.01) as well as milk fat yield (1.42 vs. 1.29 kg/d; P = 0.02). A trend (P = 0.06) for higher milk fat % (3.41% vs. 3.21%) was observed. Both diets resulted in similar body weight, but CON-fed cows tended (P = 0.08) to have higher BCS. Higher plasma methionine levels were determined with SM compared with CON (29.6 vs. 18.4 μM; P < 0.01), but lysine and histidine were not different. Dietary supplementation of RPM improved productive performance by increasing milk yield and milk components yields, suggesting better dietary AA utilization when Met levels are adjusted in Lys-adequate lactation diets.

Effect of rumen-protected lysine supplementation of diets based on corn protein fed to lactating dairy cows

This trial tested whether rumen-protected Lys (RPL) supplementation would improve the nutritive value of rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) from corn protein. Thirty-two lactating Holstein cows were blocked by days in milk and parity into 8 squares of 4 cows each in replicated 4 × 4 Latin squares. Treatments provided all supplemental crude protein from: (1) soy protein (67% expeller soybean meal plus 33% solvent soybean meal); (2) a blend of soy and corn protein (33% expeller soybean meal, 17% solvent soybean meal, 25% corn gluten meal plus 25% distillers dried grains with solubles); (3) corn protein (50% corn gluten meal plus 50% distillers dried grains with solubles); or (4) corn protein plus RPL [diet 3 top-dressed with RPL (125 g/d of AjiPro-L Generation 1, supplying an estimated 20 g of absorbable Lys/d)]. Diets contained (dry matter basis) 22% alfalfa silage, 43% corn silage, 18% ground high-moisture and dry corn, 2.4% mineral-vitamin premix, 1.5 to 3.9% soy hulls, 15% crude protein, 30 to 32% neutral detergent fiber and predicted to contain equal rumen-degradable protein, RUP, and metabolizable protein. Cows within squares were randomly assigned to treatment sequences and fed diets for 4-wk periods before switching; production data and blood samples were collected during last 2 wk of each period. Data were analyzed using the mixed procedures of SAS. Intake was highest on diet 1, intermediate on diets 2 and 3, and lowest on diet 4; body weight gain was highest on diet 3, intermediate on diets 1 and 2 and lowest on diet 4. Intakes and body weight changes were reflected by differences in milk/dry matter intake, which was highest on diets 2 and 4 and lowest on diet 3. Milk yield was lower on diet 3 (44.3 kg/d) than on diets 1, 2, and 4 (average 45.8 kg/d) and protein yield was highest on diets 1 and 2 (average 1.35 kg/d), intermediate on diet 4 (1.30 kg/d), and lowest on diet 3 (1.25 kg/d). No effects of diet were detected on ruminal metabolites. Free nonessential amino acids and total protein AA were elevated in blood plasma on diet 3, reflecting reduced utilization for milk protein synthesis. These results indicated that 50% dilution of soybean meal RUP with that from corn protein did not reduce yield and that supplementing RPL to the corn protein-based diet increased yield 1.1 kg of milk/d and 50 g of true protein/d.

Effects of rumen-protected lysine and histidine on milk production and energy and nitrogen utilization in diets containing hydrolyzed feather meal fed to lactating Jersey cows

Hydrolyzed feather meal (HFM) is high in crude protein, most of which bypasses rumen degradation when fed to lactating dairy cows, allowing direct supply of AA to the small intestine. Compared with other feeds that are high in bypass protein, such as blood meal or heat-treated soybean meal, HFM is low in His and Lys. The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of supplementing rumen-protected (RP) Lys and His individually or in combination in a diet containing 5% HFM on milk production and composition as well as energy and N partitioning. Twelve multiparous Jersey cows (mean ± SD: 91 ± 18 d in milk) were used in a triplicated 4 × 4 Latin square with 4 periods of 28 d (24-d adaptation and 4-d collection). Throughout the experiment, all cows were fed the same TMR, with HFM included at 5% of diet DM. Cows were grouped by dry matter intake and milk yield, and cows within a group were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: no RP Lys or RP His; RP Lys only [70 g/d of Ajipro-L (24 g/d of digestible Lys), Ajinomoto Co. Inc., Tokyo, Japan]; RP His only [32 g/d of experimental product (7 g/d of digestible His), Balchem Corp., New Hampton, NY]; or both RP Lys and His. Plasma Lys concentration increased when RP Lys was supplemented without RP His (77.7 vs. 66.0 ± 4.69 µM) but decreased when RP Lys was supplemented with RP His (71.4 vs. 75.0 ± 4.69 µM). Plasma concentration of 3-methylhistidine decreased with RP Lys (3.19 vs. 3.40 ± 0.31 µM). With RP His, plasma concentration of His increased (21.8 vs. 18.7 ± 2.95 µM). For milk production and milk composition, no effects of Lys were observed. Supplementing RP His increased milk yield (22.5 vs. 21.6 ± 2.04 kg/d) and tended to increase milk protein yield (0.801 vs. 0.772 ± 0.051 kg/d). Across treatments, dry matter intake (18.5 ± 0.83 kg/d) and energy supply (32.2 ± 2.24 Mcal of net energy for lactation) were not different. Supplementing RP His did not affect N utilization; however, supplementing RP Lys increased N balance (25 vs. 16 ± 9 g/d). The lack of production responses to RP Lys suggests that Lys was not limiting or that the increase in Lys supply was not large enough to cause an increase in milk protein yield. However, increased N balance and decreased 3-methylhistidine with RP Lys suggest that increased Lys supply increased protein accretion and decreased protein mobilization. Furthermore, His may be a limiting AA in diets containing HFM.