Observational study on associations between resilience indicators based on daily milk yield in first lactation and lifetime profitability

Resilience indicator traits in 3 dairy cattle breeds in Baden-Württemberg

In recent years, research in animal breeding has increasingly focused on the topic of resilience, which is expected to continue in the future due to the need for high-yielding, healthy, and robust animals. In this context, an established approach is the calculation of resilience indicator traits with time series analyses. Examples are the variance and autocorrelation of daily milk yield in dairy cows. We applied this methodology to the German dairy cow population. Data from the 3 breeds (German Holstein, German Fleckvieh, and German Brown Swiss) were obtained, which included 13,949 lactations from 36 farms from the state Baden-Württemberg in Germany working with automatic milking systems. Using the milk yield data, the daily absolute milk yields, deviations between observed and expected daily milk yields, and relative proportions of daily milk yields in relation to lactation performance were calculated. We used the variance and autocorrelation of these data as phenotypes in our statistical analyses. We estimated a heritability of 0.047 for autocorrelation and heritabilities between 0.026 and 0.183 for variance-based indicator traits. Furthermore, significant breed differences could be observed, with a tendency of better resilience in Brown Swiss. The breed differences can be due to both genetic and environmental factors. A high value of a variance-based indicator trait indicates a low resilience. Performance traits were positively correlated with variance-based indicator traits calculated from absolute daily milk yields, but they were negatively correlated with variance-based indicators calculated from relative daily milk yields. Thus, they can be considered as different traits. Although variance-based indicators based on absolute daily milk yields were affected by the performance level, variance-based indicators based on relative daily milk yields were corrected for the performance level and also showed higher heritabilities. Thus, they seem to be more suitable for practical use. Further studies need to be conducted to calculate the correlations between resilience indicators, functional traits, and health traits.

A comprehensive meta-analysis of genetic parameters for resilience and productivity indicator traits in Holstein cattle

Selection for resilience indicator (RIND) traits in Holstein cattle is becoming an important breeding objective as the worldwide population is expected to be exposed to increased environmental stressors due to both climate change and changing industry standards. However, genetic correlations between RIND and productivity indicator (PIND) traits, which are already being selected for and have the most economic value, are often unfavorable. As a result, it is necessary to fully understand these genetic relationships when incorporating novel traits into selection indices, so that informed decisions can be made to fully optimize selection for both groups of traits. In the past 2 decades, there have been many estimates of RIND traits published in the literature, albeit in small populations. To provide valuable pooled summary estimates, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for heritability and genetic correlation estimates for PIND and RIND traits in worldwide Holstein cattle. In total, 926 heritability estimates for 9 PIND and 27 RIND traits, along with 362 estimates of genetic correlation (PIND × RIND traits) were collected. Resilience indicator traits were grouped into the following subgroups: Metabolic Diseases, Hoof Health, Udder Health, Fertility, Heat Tolerance, Longevity, and Other. Pooled estimates of heritability for PIND traits ranged from 0.201 ± 0.05 (energy-corrected milk) to 0.377 ± 0.06 (protein content), while pooled estimates of heritability for RIND traits ranged from 0.032 ± 0.02 (incidence of lameness, incidence of milk fever) to 0.497 ± 0.05 (measures of body weight). Pooled estimates of genetic correlations ranged from -0.360 ± 0.25 (protein content vs. milk acetone concentration) to 0.535 ± 0.72 (measures of fat-to-protein ratio vs. milk acetone concentration). Additionally, out of 243 potential genetic correlations between PIND and RIND traits that could have been reported, only 40 had enough published estimates to implement the meta-analysis model. Our results confirmed that the interactions between PIND and RIND traits are complex, and all relationships should be evaluated when incorporating novel traits into selection indices. This study provides a valuable reference for breeders looking to incorporate RIND traits for Holstein cattle into selection indices.

The genetics of resilience and its relationships with egg production traits and antibody traits in chickens

BACKGROUND

Resilience is the capacity of an animal to be minimally affected by disturbances or to rapidly return to its initial state before exposure to a disturbance. Resilient livestock are desired because of their improved health and increased economic profit. Genetic improvement of resilience may also lead to trade-offs with production traits. Recently, resilience indicators based on longitudinal data have been suggested, but they need further evaluation to determine whether they are indeed predictive of improved resilience, such as disease resilience. This study investigated different resilience indicators based on deviations between expected and observed egg production (EP) by exploring their genetic parameters, their possible trade-offs with production traits, and their relationships with antibody traits in chickens.

METHODS

Egg production in a nucleus breeding herd environment based on 1-week-, 2-week-, or 3-week-intervals of two purebred chicken lines, a white egg-laying (33,825 chickens) and a brown egg-laying line (34,397 chickens), were used to determine deviations between observed EP and expected average batch EP, and between observed EP and expected individual EP. These deviations were used to calculate three types of resilience indicators for two life periods of each individual: natural logarithm-transformed variance (ln(variance)), skewness, and lag-one autocorrelation (autocorrelation) of deviations from 25 to 83 weeks of age and from 83 weeks of age to end of life. Then, we estimated their genetic correlations with EP traits and with two antibody traits.

RESULTS

The most promising resilience indicators were those based on 1-week-intervals, as they had the highest heritability estimates (0.02-0.12) and high genetic correlations (above 0.60) with the same resilience indicators based on longer intervals. The three types of resilience indicators differed genetically from each other, which indicates that they possibly capture different aspects of resilience. Genetic correlations of the resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals with EP traits were favorable or zero, which means that trade-off effects were marginal. The resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals also showed no genetic correlations with the antibody traits, which suggests that they are not informative for improved immunity or vice versa in the nucleus environment.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper gives direction towards the evaluation and implementation of resilience indicators, i.e. to further investigate resilience indicator traits based on 1-week-intervals, in breeding programs for selecting genetically more resilient layer chickens.

Unraveling the genomic background of resilience based on variability in milk yield and milk production levels in North American Holstein cattle through genome-wide association study and Mendelian randomization analyses

Breeding more resilient animals will benefit the dairy cattle industry in the long term, especially as global climate changes become more severe. Previous studies have reported genetic parameters for various milk yield-based resilience indicators, but the underlying genomic background of these traits remain unknown. In this study, we conducted GWAS of 62,029 SNPs with 4 milk yield-based resilience indicators, including the weighted occurrence frequency (wfPert) and accumulated milk losses (dPert) of milk yield perturbations, and log-transformed variance (LnVar) and lag-1 autocorrelation (rauto) of daily yield residuals. These variables were previously derived from 5.6 million daily milk yield records from 21,350 lactations (parities 1-3) of 11,787 North American Holstein cows. The average daily milk yield (ADMY) throughout lactation was also included to compare the shared genetic background of resilience indicators with milk yield. The differential genetic background of these indicators was first revealed by the significant genomic regions identified and significantly enriched biological pathways of positional candidate genes, which confirmed the genetic difference among resilience indicators. Interestingly, the functional analyses of candidate genes suggested that the regulation of intestinal homeostasis is most likely affecting resilience derived based on variability in milk yield. Based on Mendelian randomization analyses of multiple instrumental SNPs, we further found an unfavorable causal association of ADMY with LnVar. In conclusion, the resilience indicators evaluated are genetically different traits, and there are causal associations of milk yield with some of the resilience indicators evaluated. In addition to providing biological insights into the molecular regulation mechanisms of resilience derived based on variability in milk yield, this study also indicates the need for developing selection indexes combining multiple indicator traits and taking into account their genetic relationship for breeding more resilient dairy cattle.

Exploring milk loss and variability during environmental perturbations across lactation stages as resilience indicators in Holstein cattle

Genetic selection for resilience is essential to improve the long-term sustainability of the dairy cattle industry, especially the ability of cows to maintain their level of production when exposed to environmental disturbances. Recording of daily milk yield provides an opportunity to develop resilience indicators based on milk losses and fluctuations in daily milk yield caused by environmental disturbances. In this context, our study aimed to explore milk loss traits and measures of variability in daily milk yield, including log-transformed standard deviation of milk deviations (Lnsd), lag-1 autocorrelation (Ra), and skewness of the deviations (Ske), as indicators of general resilience in dairy cows. The unperturbed dynamics of milk yield as well as milk loss were predicted using an iterative procedure of lactation curve modeling. Milk fluctuations were defined as a period of at least 10 successive days of negative deviations in which milk yield dropped at least once below 90% of the expected values. Genetic parameters of these indicators and their genetic correlation with economically important traits were estimated using single-trait and bivariate animal models and 8,935 lactations (after quality control) from 6,816 Chinese Holstein cows. In general, cows experienced an average of 3.73 environmental disturbances with a milk loss of 267 kg of milk per lactation. Each fluctuation lasted for 19.80 ± 11.46 days. Milk loss traits are heritable with heritability estimates ranging from 0.004 to 0.061. The heritabilities differed between Lnsd (0.135-0.250), Ra (0.008-0.058), and Ske (0.001-0.075), with the highest heritability estimate of 0.250 ± 0.020 for Lnsd when removing the first and last 10 days in milk in a lactation (Lnsd2). Based on moderate to high genetic correlations, lower Lnsd2 is associated with less milk losses, better reproductive performance, and lower disease incidence. These findings indicate that among the variables evaluated, Lnsd2 is the most promising indicator for breeding for improved resilience in Holstein cattle.