Characterization of metabolites in domestic sow urine after intravenous administration of radioactive estrogen and corticosteroids

Rapid comparison of metabolites in humans and rats of different sexes using untargeted UPLC-TOFMS and an in-house software platform

Metabolite differences between sexes have rarely been observed in a global manner, but it has recently been made possible by the advancement in metabolomics techniques. In this study, untargeted ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry and an in-house software platform were used for a rapid comparison of sex differences in urinary metabolites in humans and in urinary and serum metabolites in Sprague Dawley (SD) rats. In addition, the species differences of urinary metabolites between humans and SD rats were also observed. Principle component analysis showed that all the observed metabolite sex differences were more distinct in SD rats than in humans, indicating that the sex differences of human urinary metabolites is small compared with that of SD rats. In SD rats, the observed metabolite sex differences were more distinct in urine than in serum, indicating the importance of urine analysis for metabolomics studies. The species differences in the urinary metabolites of humans and SD rats were much more distinct than any of the observed sex differences. Many sex- and species-related markers were discovered and putatively identified. In both humans and SD rats, steroid metabolites appeared to constitute a major sex difference in urinary metabolites. This provides new proof of the special importance of steroid metabolites in sex differences from an untargeted metabolomics investigation, which is rare for sex differences. Contrary patterns involving adrenocortical activity appeared to exist between rodents and humans, which agrees with previous reports. In the serum metabolites of SD rats, sex differences in ascorbic acid or its isomer and pantothenic acid or its isomer, but not in steroid metabolites, were prominent. Human-specific α-N- phenylacetyl-l-glutamine and androsterone glucuronide were among the putative identities of the markers discriminating humans and SD rats. This study demonstrated the feasibility of an in-house software platform and provides metabolite-related information on sex and species differences.

Fate and transformation of an estrogen conjugate and its metabolites in agricultural soils

In the environment, conjugated estrogens are nontoxic but may hydrolyze to their potent unconjugated, 'free' forms. Compared to free estrogens, conjugated estrogens would be more mobile in the environment because of their higher water solubility. To identify the fate of a conjugated estrogen in natural agricultural soils, batch experiments were conducted with a (14)C labeled prototype conjugate, 17β-estradiol-3-glucuronide (E2-3G). Initially, aqueous dissipation was dominated by biological hydrolysis of E2-3G and its oxidized metabolite, estrone glucuronide (E1-3G), both of which were transformed into the free estrogens, 17β-estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1), respectively. Following hydrolysis, hydrophobic sorption interactions of E2 and E1 dominated. Depending on soil organic matter contents, dissolved E2-3G persisted from 1-14 d, which was much longer than what others reported for free estrogens (generally <24 h). Biodegradation rate constants of E2-3G were smaller in the subsoil (0.01-0.02 h(-1)) compared to topsoil (0.2-0.4 h(-1)). Field observations supported our laboratory findings where significant concentrations (425 ng L(-1)) of intact E2-3G were detected in groundwater (6.5-8.1 m deep) near a swine (Sus scrofa domesticus) farm. This study provides evidence that conjugate estrogens may be a significant source of free estrogens to surface water and groundwater.

The potential steroid hormone contribution of farm animals to freshwaters, the United Kingdom as a case study

The combined farm animal population is considerably larger than the human one in the United Kingdom, implying a possibly important contribution to the environmental load of steroid hormones entering water. To make comparisons on the amount of steroid hormones produced by the different livestock, information was gathered on the structure of the UK farm animal populations and the amount of hormones excreted by animals at each of their life stages. An individual normalised dairy cow excretes two orders of magnitude more, and a normalised pig excretes more than one order of magnitude more steroid oestrogens than a normalised human. In terms of excretion, the combined farm animal population (including sheep and poultry) probably generates around four times more oestrogens than the human population in the UK. The biggest contributor on the animal side is the relatively small dairy cow population. If steroid oestrogens behave like herbicides, in which a worst case loss to surface waters is around 1%, then it could be argued that farm animals are responsible for 15% of all the oestrogens in UK waters. When simulations were made with the MACRO pesticide leaching model, predicted concentrations for field drains failed to exceed 1 ng/L. The rapid biodegradation rates, and high sorption rates taken from the literature and used in the model suggested less than 0.001% of oestrogens would reach the field drains. This survey suggests that direct excretion of steroid hormones by animals into water courses, or discharges from farmyard drains, are likely to be more important sources of contamination rather than via normal agricultural scenarios.