Evidence-based management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of nonoperative management

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Intra-Axial Brain Tumors: Everything the Neuroradiologist Should Know

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive cytoreductive treatment option for patients with intracranial tumors. Utilizing real-time MR thermometry, LITT delivers tailored, targeted, and permanent cytotoxic thermal injury to intra-axial pathology. As a minimally invasive and nonionizing treatment option proved to be an effective, less morbid, and more efficient alternative to surgery, the utility of LITT has rapidly expanded. Along with this growth comes the need for neurosurgeons and neuroradiologists to accurately assess the radiographic outcomes of LITT in a standardized, dependable, and longitudinal fashion. We present a comprehensive overview of the indications and mechanisms of action of LITT for intra-axial brain tumors as well as guidance on thorough pre-, intra-, and postoperative imaging assessments. Using detailed case examples describing the contemporary uses of LITT, we hope to provide a foundational understanding of LITT that will inform imaging assessment and guide accurate multi disciplinary tumor board discussion.

[Indications for surgical treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracic spine and lumbar spine]

Fractures of the thoracic (Th) and lumbar (L) vertebrae are among the most frequent fracture entities in Germany and particularly affect the thoracolumbar junction (TLJ; Th11-L2). Based on expert recommendations and consensus meetings, the thoracolumbar AOSpine injury score was established for patients with healthy bone and the osteoporotic fracture (OF) score for geriatric patients with the respective classifications for treatment decisions. In both cohorts, the treatment decision is based on the fracture morphology, neurological status and patient-specific contextual factors. In terms of fracture morphology, surgical treatment is generally indicated for distraction and rotation/translation injuries. The treatment decision for compression fractures is more complex as additional factors must be taken into consideration. The decision in patients with healthy bone is primarily influenced by imaging morphological criteria (deformity and destruction) whereas in osteoporotic patients the decision is influenced by individual criteria, such as the general condition, the possibility of low pain mobilization and concomitant diseases. Overall, the treatment decision for fractures of the TLJ is not dogmatic as individual factors must be considered and high-quality studies are lacking.

Predictive accuracy of machine learning models for conservative treatment failure in thoracolumbar burst fractures

BACKGROUND

The management of patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures remains a topic of debate, with conservative treatment being successful in most cases but not all. This study aimed to assess the utility of machine learning models (MLMs) in predicting the need for surgery in patients with these fractures who do not respond to conservative management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 357 patients with traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures treated conservatively between January 2017 and October 2023 was conducted. Various potential risk factors for treatment failure were evaluated, including age, gender, BMI, smoking, diabetes, vertebral body compression rate, anterior height compression, Cobb angle, interpedicular distance, canal compromise, and pain intensity. Three MLMs-random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and k-nearest neighborhood (k-NN)-were used to predict treatment failure, with the RF model also identifying factors associated with treatment failure.

RESULTS

Among the patients studied, most (85.2%) completed conservative treatment, while 14.8% required surgery during follow-up. Smoking (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.54-2.86; p = 0.011) and interpedicular distance (OR: 2.31; 95% CI: 1.22-2.73; p = 0.003) were found to be independent risk factors for treatment failure. The MLMs demonstrated good performance, with SVM achieving the highest accuracy (0.931), followed by RF (0.911) and k-NN (0.896). SVM also exhibited superior sensitivity and specificity compared to the other models, with AUC values of 0.897, 0.854, and 0.815 for SVM, RF, and k-NN, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the effectiveness of MLMs in predicting conservative treatment failure in patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures. These models offer valuable prognostic insights that can aid in optimizing patient management and clinical outcomes in this specific patient population.

Thoracolumbar injuries: non operative treatment: indications, management

INTRODUCTION

Thoracolumbar spine injuries can result from various traumatic events such as falls, motor vehicle accidents, and sports injuries. While surgical intervention is often indicated for complex fractures and in case of neurological deficits, non-operative treatment remains a viable option for certain types of injuries.

AIMS

This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the specific indications and treatment options of non-operative thoracolumbar spine injuries. It seeks to provide evidence-based recommendations for selecting patients suitable for conservative management based on fracture type and stability, absence of neurological deficits, spine deformity, integrity of the posterior ligament complex and patient specific factors.

Efficacy and Safety of Conservative Treatment Compared With Surgical Treatment for Thoracolumbar Fracture With Score 4 Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

This was a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The clinical outcomes, radiologic outcome, and complications were compared between surgical treatment and conservative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) score of 4.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The thoracolumbar fracture is the main reason leading to the spinal cord injury. Some studies suggested that the treatment of TLICS=4 is a "gray zone." Hence, the efficacy and safety of surgical treatment and conservative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with scores 4 TLICS was still debated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chongqing VIP Database (VIP), and Wan Fang Database was performed up to October 2021. Relevant studies were identified using specific eligibility criteria and data was extracted and analyzed based on primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies involving 555 patients were included (3 randomized controlled trials and 7 retrospective studies). There was no significant difference of hospital time (standardized mean difference=0.24, 95% CI: -1.50 to 1.97, P =0.79) and Oswestry Disability Index (mean difference=2.97, 95% CI: -1.07 to 7.01, P =0.15) between surgery and nonsurgery. The length of returning to work was shorter in surgical treatment (standardized mean difference=1.27, 95% CI: 0.07-2.46, P =0.04). Visual Analog Scale in surgical treatment was lower at 1, 3, and 6 months (respectively, P <0.00001, P =0.003, and P =0.02). However, there existed no significant difference between surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment at 12 and >24 months (respectively, P =0.18 and 0.17). Cobb angle was lower in surgical treatment at postoperative at 6, 12, and >24 months (respectively, P =0.005, P <0.00001, P =0.002, and P =0.0002). Finally, the surgical treatment had a lower incidence of complications (odds ratio=3.89, 95% CI: 1.90-7.94, P =0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence recommended that surgical treatment is superior to conservative treatment of TLICS score of 4 at the early follow-up. Surgical treatment had lower Cobb angle, Visual Analog Scale scores, and complications compared with a nonsurgical TLICS score of 4. However, these findings needed to be verified further by multicenter, double-blind, and large-sample randomized controlled trials.

Outcome of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures in elderly: A systematic review

Introduction

Adequate guidelines for treatment of people over 65 years, suffering traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures without neurologic deficit, are currently lacking.

Research question

The aim of this study was to systematically review the available literature regarding the outcome of conservative and surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spinal trauma in elderly patients.

Material and methods

A systematic review according the PRISMA guidelines was performed. Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central register were searched until June 2021. Risk of bias of the included studies was evaluated. Clinical and radiological results, as well as complications of conservative or surgical treatment were reviewed.

Results

Six articles were included (one prospective randomized trial, two prospective and three retrospective cohort studies). In these studies conflicting results were observed with regard to pain, radiological results and complications following both conservative and surgical treatment strategies for thoracolumbar spine fractures in elderly.

Discussion and conclusion

Treatment of thoracolumbar fractures in elderly should focus on early mobilization to reduce complications and hospital stay. This may improve functional outcome and prevent worsening of frailty in this vulnerable group of patients. To elucidate the optimal treatment for elderly patient with thoracolumbar fractures, future research should focus on patient specific treatment rather than the mere difference between outcome of surgical and conservative treatment.

The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Treatment Algorithm in Decision Making for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the alignment of the AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification system and treatment algorithm with contemporary surgical decision making.

METHODS

183 cases of thoracolumbar burst fractures were reviewed by 22 AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts. These experienced clinicians classified the fracture morphology, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex and degree of comminution. Management recommendations were collected.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant stepwise increase in rates of operative management with escalating category of injury (P < .001). An excellent correlation existed between recommended expert management and the actual treatment of each injury category: A0/A1/A2 (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.69, P = .71), A3/4 (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.98-2.66, P = .58) and B1/B2/C (1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.14, P = .99). Thoracolumbar A4 fractures were more likely to be surgically stabilized than A3 fractures (68.2% vs 30.9%, P < .001). A modifier indicating indeterminate ligamentous injury increased the rate of operative management when comparing type B and C injuries to type A3/A4 injuries (OR 39.19, 95% CI 20.84-73.69, P < .01 vs OR 27.72, 95% CI 14.68-52.33, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification system introduces fracture morphology in a rational and hierarchical manner of escalating severity. Thoracolumbar A4 complete burst fractures were more likely to be operatively managed than A3 fractures. Flexion-distraction type B injuries and translational type C injuries were much more likely to have surgery recommended than type A fractures regardless of the M1 modifier. A suspected posterior ligamentous injury increased the likelihood of surgeons favoring surgical stabilization.

Impact of different surgical and non-surgical interventions on health-related quality of life after thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: protocol for a comprehensive systematic review with network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is no international consensus on how to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBFs) without neurological deficits. The planned systematic review with network meta-analyses (NMA) aims to compare the effects on treatment outcomes, focusing on midterm health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a comprehensive and systematic literature search, identifying studies comparing two or more treatment modalities. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science from January 2000 until July 2023 for publications. We will include (randomised and non-randomised) controlled clinical trials assessing surgical and non-surgical treatment methods for adults with TLBF. Screening of references, data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment will be done independently by two reviewers. We will extract relevant studies, participants and intervention characteristics. The RoB will be assessed using the revised Cochrane RoB V.2.0 tool for randomised trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for controlled trials. The OR for dichotomous data and standardised mean differences for continuous data will be presented with their respective 95% CIs. We will conduct a random-effects NMA to assess the treatments and determine the superiority of the therapeutic approaches. Our primary outcomes will be midterm (6 months to 2 years after injury) overall HRQoL and pain. Secondary outcomes will include radiological or clinical findings. We will present network graphs, forest plots and relative rankings on plotted rankograms corresponding to the treatment rank probabilities. The ranking results will be represented by the area under the cumulative ranking curve. Analyses will be performed in Stata V.16.1 and R. The quality of the evidence will be evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required. The research will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Operative results of AO A3 and A4 traumatic injuries in the thoracic and lumbar spine. A multicenter surveillance study of 4230 patients from the German Spine Registry (DWG-Register)

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis, classification and treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, continue to be controversial. Surgery is generally the preferred treatment for unstable fractures while stable fractures are managed conservatively. This study aims to describe surgical procedures, outcomes, complications, demography, clinical features and differences between A3 and A4 fractures (AO classification) of the thoracolumbar region. A subgroup of patients <91 years with osteoporotic fractures is included and analyzed.

METHODS

Analysis of data from the DWG-Register German spine registry on operative treatment for thoracolumbar AO A3 and A4 fractures out of 170 departments from January 2017 to May 2021. The evaluated variables included age, gender, surgical approach (posterior, anterior combined), and re-operation.

RESULTS

In total, 4230 AO A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures were identified in the registry; 2898 A3 (group 1) and 1332 A4 (group 2). The preoperative ASIA-impairment scale score in group 1 was significantly different compared with group 2 (P=0.02). Surgical procedures such as decompression/stabilization with rod-screw system cemented/non-cemented, as well as an anterior approach, were statistically significant between the groups. Odds ratio was calculated for variables that could be influenced for the type of fracture (A3 or A4): decompression 4.89, OR time >2 hours 48.22, osteoporosis 6.46 and posterior access 9.85.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides multicenter results from a huge number of surgically treated AO A3 and A4 fractures. Anterior approaches are more often used in A4 type fractures, probably because of its inherent instability related to burst fractures, surprisingly, not associated with the occurrence of added perioperative complications. Nevertheless, A3 type fractures are presented with worse ASIA Impairment-Scale at admission, in comparison with A4 type fractures of the thoracolumbar region.

Lateral-Opening Injection Tool Used in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty to Treat Asymptomatic Osteoporotic Vertebral Burst Fractures: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

The adequate management of asymptomatic osteoporotic vertebral burst fractures (OVBFs) was still controversial. Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) could achieve quick recovery with minor trauma, but there were certain safety problems by traditional bone cement injection method. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of lateral-opening injection tool used in PVP treating patients with asymptomatic OVBFs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of OVBFs treated in our institute from March 2016 to March 2020. A total of 66 patients (mean age 72.10 ± 7.98 years, with 21 men and 45 women) who were diagnosed with acute asymptomatic OVBFs with mild spinal canal compromise were treated with PVP by using a lateral-opening injection tool. Two puncture needles were simultaneously placed transpedicularly in the fractured vertebra, and the inner core was removed, and the lateral-opening injection tool was inserted. The adjustment of lateral hole was to improve the distribution height of bone cement and avoid the entry of bone cement into the posterior wall of vertebral body. Related clinical outcomes and images were assessed, including back pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), vertebral height ratio (fractured vertebral height/average adjacent nonfractured vertebral height), kyphosis Cobb angle, union of the fractured vertebral posterior wall, distribution of bone cement, surgical data, and complications.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time of all cases was 21.23 ± 9.35 months. The mean amount of bone cement was 3.28 ± 0.35 ml in the vertebrae and the mean operative time was 34.02 ± 5.23 min. There were 60 cases of bone cement that contacted the upper and lower endplates on at least one side. There was no cement leakage into the spinal canal or fracture displacement of the posterior wall of the vertebral body in all cases. The VAS scores were 3.78 ± 0.42 at 1 day postoperatively and 0.53 ± 0.40 at the last follow-up, significantly lower than 8.40 ± 0.48 preoperatively (p < 0.05). The average height ratio of anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body after operation increased compared with that pre-operation (p < 0.05), and the postoperative kyphosis angle decreased (p < 0.05). At 6 months follow-up, there was no significant height loss of the vertebral body. Computed tomography examination 3 months postoperatively showed that the fracture of posterior vertebral wall healed well in all cases. There were seven cases of bone cement leakage without clinical symptoms and two adjacent vertebral fractures caused by falling. There were no cases of deep vein embolism, lower limb muscle atrophy, pneumonia, decubitus.

CONCLUSION

The lateral opening tool can be safely and effectively used in the PVP treatment on asymptomatic OVBFs with mild spinal canal compromise.

Classifications and level of evidence trends from the most influential literature on thoracolumbar burst fractures: A bibliometric analysis

Background

There are known classifications that describe thoracolumbar (TL) burst type injury but it is unclear which have the most influence on management. Our objective is to investigate the association of classification publications with the quantity and type of the most influential articles on TL burst fractures.

Methods

Web of Science was searched, and exclusion and inclusion criteria were used to extract the top 100 cited articles on TL burst fractures. The effects on type, number, and other variables were separated into four eras as defined by four major classification publications.

Results

30 out of the top 100 articles represent level 1 or 2 evidence. The most influential journal was Spine, accounting for 35 articles and 4,537 citations. The highest number of articles (53) was published between the years 1995-2005, culminating with the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity Classification Score (TLICS) paper. After 2005, there was an increase in average citations per year. Following 2013, the number of highly influential articles decreased, and systematic reviews (SRs) became a larger proportion of the literature. There was a statistically significant increase in the level of 1 and 2 evidence articles with time until the publication of TLICS. The predictive value of time for higher levels of evidence was only seen in the pre-2005 years (AUC: 0.717, 95% CI 0.579-0.855, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

In 1994, two articles marked the beginning of an era of highly influential TL burst fracture literature. The 2005 TLICS score was associated with a preceding increase in LOE and productivity. Following 2005, the literature saw a decrease in productivity and an increase in systematic review/meta-analysis (SR-MAs). These trends represent an increase in scholarly discussion that led to a systematic synthesis of the existing literature after publication of the 2005 TLICS article.

Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Anterior and Posterior Approaches

Background

A thoracolumbar burst fracture (BF) is a severe type of compression fracture, which is the most common type of traumatic spine fractures. Generally, surgery is the preferred treatment, but whether the optimal approach is either an anterior or a posterior approach remains unclear. This study aims to determine whether either method provides an advantage.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted, identifying studies comparing anterior versus posterior surgical approaches in patients with thoracolumbar BFs. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Seven studies were included.

Results

An operative time of 87.97 min (53.91, 122.03; p<0.0001) and blood loss of 497.04 mL (281.8, 712.28; p<0.0001) were lower in the posterior approach. Length of hospital stay, complications, reintervention rate, neurological outcomes, postoperative kyphotic angle, and costs were similar between both groups.

Conclusions

Surgical intervention is usually selected to rehabilitate patients with BFs. The data obtained from this study suggest that a posterior approach represents a viable alternative to an anterior approach, with various advantages such as a shorter operative time and decreased bleeding.

Artery of Davidoff and Schechter: A Large Angiographic Case Series of Dural AV Fistulas

The artery of Davidoff and Schechter (ADS) is the only meningeal branch of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA), supplying the medial tentorial margin and posterior portions of the falx. Given its small size, it is rarely identified on angiographic studies, unless enlarged in pathologies such as dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs) or vascularized masses. This artery was first described by Wollschlaeger and Wollschlaeger in 1965, and to date, only a few reports have described its significance. The objective of this study is to report our experience with the ADS in dural fistulas from 2 tertiary medical centers and to emphasize the importance of recognizing this artery during angiographic examination of vascular tentorial and posterior fossa lesions. To our knowledge, this report demonstrates the largest angiographic case series published to date, recognizing a total of 7 patients with ADS arising secondary to a posterior fossa or tentorial DAVF and one of the largest reported series of DAVFs supplied by the ADS treated by endovascular and surgical techniques. Our cases validate the importance of prompt identification of the ADS for the diagnosis as well as endovascular treatment of vascular malformations in the posterior fossa and tentorial region.

How Should Patients with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score of 4 Be Treated?

The thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) system help surgeons decide whether patients should undergo initial operative treatment or nonoperative treatment. However, the best treatment for patients with TLICS 4 fracture remains unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for nonoperative treatment failure in patients with TLICS 4 fracture and establish treatment standards for TLICS 4 fractures. This study included 44 patients with TLICS 4 fracture who initially received nonoperative treatment. We divided these patients into two groups: the successful nonoperative treatment group included 18 patients, and the operative treatment group after nonoperative treatment failure included 26 patients. In multiple logistic regression analysis, spinal canal compromise (odd ratio = 1.316) and kyphotic angle (odd ratio = 1.416) were associated with nonoperative treatment failure in patients with TLICS 4 fracture. Other factors, including age, sex, BMI, initial VAS score, and loss of vertebral body height, were not significantly associated with nonoperative treatment failure in these patients. Spinal canal compromise and kyphotic angle were associated with nonoperative treatment failure in patients with TLICS 4 fracture. Therefore, we recommend the surgeon observe spinal canal compromise and kyphotic angle more carefully when deciding on the treatment of patients with TLICS 4 fracture.

Safety and efficacy studies of kyphoplasty, mesh-container-plasty, and pedicle screw fixation plus vertebroplasty for thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral burst fractures

Background

Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP), percutaneous mesh-container-plasty (PMCP), and pedicle screw fixation plus vertebroplasty (PSFV) were three methods for osteoporotic vertebral burst fractures (OVBF). The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of PKP, PMCP, and PSFV for OVBFs.

Methods

This retrospective study included 338 consecutive patients with thoracolumbar OVBFs who underwent PKP (n = 111), PMCP (n = 109), or PSFV (n = 118) and compared their epidemiological data, surgical outcomes, and clinical and radiological features. Clinical evaluations of VAS and ODI and radiological evaluations of height restoration, deformity correction, cement leakage, and canal compromise were calculated preoperatively, postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively.

Results

Cement leakage (31/111 vs. 13/109 and 16/118, P < 0.05) was significantly higher in group PKP than in groups PSFV and PMCP. VAS and ODI scores improved postoperatively from 7.04 ± 1.15 and 67.11 ± 13.49 to 2.27 ± 1.04 and 22.00 ± 11.20, respectively, in group PKP (P < 0.05); from 7.04 ± 1.29 and 67.26 ± 12.79 to 2.17 ± 0.98 and 21.01 ± 7.90, respectively, in group PMCP (P < 0.05); and from 7.10 ± 1.37 and 67.36 ± 13.11 to 3.19 ± 1.06 and 33.81 ± 8.81, respectively, in the PSFV group (P < 0.05). Moreover, postoperative VAS and ODI scores were significantly higher in group PSFV than in groups PKP and PMCP (P < 0.05). However, VAS scores were not significantly different in the three groups 2 years postoperatively (P > 0.05). Postoperative anterior (81.04 ± 10.18% and 87.51 ± 8.94% vs. 93.46 ± 6.42%, P < 0.05) and middle vertebral body height ratio (83.01 ± 10.16% and 87.79 ± 11.62% vs. 92.38 ± 6.00%, P < 0.05) were significantly higher in group PSFV than in groups PMCP and PKP. Postoperatively, Cobb angle (10.04 ± 4.26° and 8.16 ± 5.76° vs. 4.97 ± 4.60°, P < 0.05) and canal compromise (20.76 ± 6.32 and 19.85 ± 6.18 vs. 10.18 ± 6.99, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in group PSFV than in groups PMCP and PKP.

Conclusion

Despite relatively worse radiological results, PMCP is a safe and minimally invasive surgical method that can obtain better short-term clinical results than PKP and PSFV for OVBFs.

Establishing the Injury Severity of Subaxial Cervical Spine Trauma: Validating the Hierarchical Nature of the AO Spine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System

STUDY DESIGN

Global cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to validate the AO Spine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification by examining the perceived injury severity by surgeon across AO geographical regions and practice experience.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous subaxial cervical spine injury classifications have been limited by subpar interobserver reliability and clinical applicability. In an attempt to create a universally validated scheme with prognostic value, AO Spine established a subaxial cervical spine injury classification involving four elements: injury morphology, facet injury involvement, neurologic status, and case-specific modifiers.

METHODS

A survey was sent to 272 AO Spine members across all geographic regions and with a variety of practice experience. Respondents graded the severity of each variable of the classification system on a scale from zero (low severity) to 100 (high severity). Primary outcome was to assess differences in perceived injury severity for each injury type over geographic regions and level of practice experience.

RESULTS

A total of 189 responses were received. Overall, the classification system exhibited a hierarchical progression in subtype injury severity scores. Only three subtypes showed a significant difference in injury severity score among geographic regions: F3 (floating lateral mass fracture, P = 0.04), N3 (incomplete spinal cord injury, P = 0.03), and M2 (critical disk herniation, P = 0.04). When stratified by surgeon experience, pairwise comparison showed only two morphological subtypes, B1 (bony posterior tension band injury, P = 0.02) and F2 (unstable facet fracture, P = 0.03), and one neurologic subtype (N3, P = 0.02) exhibited a significant difference in injury severity score.

CONCLUSION

The AO Spine Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System has shown to be reliable and suitable for proper patient management. The study shows this classification is substantially generalizable by geographic region and surgeon experience, and provides a consistent method of communication among physicians while covering the majority of subaxial cervical spine traumatic injuries.Level of Evidence: 4.

Invasive Treatments for Low Back Disorders

OBJECTIVE

This abbreviated version of the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine's Low Back Disorders guideline reviews the evidence and recommendations developed for invasive treatments used to manage low back disorders.

METHODS

Comprehensive systematic literature reviews were accomplished with article abstraction, critiquing, grading, evidence table compilation, and guideline finalization by a multidisciplinary expert panel and extensive peer-review to develop evidence-based guidance. Consensus recommendations were formulated when evidence was lacking and often relied on analogy to other disorders for which evidence exists. A total of 47 high-quality and 321 moderate-quality trials were identified for invasive management of low back disorders.

RESULTS

Guidance has been developed for the invasive management of acute, subacute, and chronic low back disorders and rehabilitation. This includes 49 specific recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Quality evidence should guide invasive treatment for all phases of managing low back disorders.

Percutaneous mesh-container-plasty for osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures: A prospective, nonrandomized comparative study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of percutaneous mesh-container-plasty (PMCP) versus percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures.

METHODS

A prospective study of 122 patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures was conducted. The patients were nonrandomly assigned to receive PKP (62; 16 men, 46 women) and PMCP (60; 14 men, 46 women). The epidemiological data, surgical outcomes, and clinical and radiological features were compared between the 2 groups. Cement leakage, height restoration, deformity correction, canal compromise, and cement distribution were calculated from the radiographs. Visual pain analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and short-form 36 health survey domains role physical (SF-36 rp) and bodily pain (SF-36 bp) were calculated before surgery and immediately and 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

Although VAS, ODI, SF-36 bp, and SF-36 rp scores improved from 7 (6-9), 71.28±16.38, 22 (0-32), and 25 (0-50) preoperatively to 2 (1-3), 20.02±8.97, 84 (84-84), and 75 (75-100) immediately postoperatively in the PMCP group (p<0.05) and from 7 (6-8), 71.40±13.52, 22 (10.5-31.75), and 25 (0-50) preoperatively to 2 (1-3), 21.78±11.21, 84 (84-84), and 75 (75-100) immediately postoperatively in the PKP group (p<0.05), there was no difference between the 2 groups. The mean cost in the PKP group was less than that in the PMCP group ($5109±231 vs. $6699±201, p<0.05). Anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body height ratios in the PMCP group were greater than those in the PKP group postoperatively (88.44%±3.76% vs. 81.10%±11.78%, 86.15%±3.50% vs. 82.30%±11.02%, and 93.91%±3.01% vs. 91.43%±6.71%, respectively, p<0.05). The Cobb angle in the PMCP group was lower than that in the PKP group postoperatively (6.67°±4.39° vs. 8.99°±4.06°, p<0.05). Cement distribution in the PMCP group was higher than that in the PKP group (30.48%±5.62% vs. 27.18%±4.87%, p<0.05). Cement leakage was observed to be lesser in the PMCP group (2/60) than in the PKP group (10 vs. 62, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both PKP and PMCP treatments seem to have significant ability in pain relief and functional recovery. Despite its higher cost, PMCP treatment may have a better inhibition ability of cement leakage, cement distribution, height restoration, and improvement in segmental kyphosis than PKP treatment for osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, Therapeutic Study.

Reliability and Clinical Usefulness of Current Classifications in Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

A validated classification remains the key to an appropriate treatment algorithm of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. Considering the development of many classifications, it is remarkable that consensus about treatment is still lacking. We conducted a systematic review to investigate which classification can be used best for treatment decision making in thoracolumbar fractures.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane using the following search terms: classification (mesh), spinal fractures (mesh), and corresponding synonyms. All hits were viewed by 2 independent researchers. Papers were included if analyzing the reliability (kappa values) and clinical usefulness (specificity or sensitivity of an algorithm) of currently most used classifications (Magerl/AO, thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score [TLICS] or thoracolumbar injury severity score, and the new AO spine).

RESULTS

Twenty articles are included. The presented kappa values indicate moderate to substantial agreement for all 3 classifications. Regarding the clinical usefulness, > 90% agreement between actual treatment and classification recommendation is reported for most fractures. However, it appears that over 50% of the patients with a stable burst fracture (TLICS 2, AO-A3/A4) in daily practice are operated, so in these cases treatment decision is not primarily based on classification.

CONCLUSION

AO, TLICS, and new AO spine classifications have acceptable accuracy (kappa > 0.4), but are limited in clinical usefulness since the treatment recommendation is not always implemented in clinical practice. Differences in treatment decision making arise from several causes, such as surgeon and patient preferences and prognostic factors that are not included in classifications yet. The recently validated thoracolumbar AO spine injury score seems promising for use in clinical practice, because of inclusion of patient-specific modifiers. Future research should prove its definite value in treatment decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Without the appropriate treatment, the impact of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures can be devastating. Therefore it is important to achieve consensus in the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with selective transforaminal endoscopic decompression for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, efficacy, and indications of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) combined with selective transforaminal endoscopic decompression (TED) in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture (TBLF).

Methods

From August 2015 to October 2018, a total of 41 patients with single-segment TLBF (28 men and 13 women) were enrolled in this study. X-ray and computed tomography were obtained before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and 1 year after surgery to evaluate spinal recovery. In addition, we used the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA), and the Frankel classification of neurological deficits to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments.

Results

The average follow-up time was 22.02 ± 8.28 months. The postoperative Cobb angle, vertebral body compression ratio, vertebral wedge angle, mid-sagittal canal diameter compression ratio, and Frankel grade were significantly improved. There were also significant improvements in the VAS (7.61 ± 1.41 vs. 1.17 ± 0.80, P < 0.001), ODI (89.82 ± 7.44 vs. 15.71 ± 13.50, P < 0.001), and JOA (6.90 ± 2.91 vs. 24.90 ± 3.03, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our results showed that PPSF combined with selective TED in the treatment of TLBF had excellent efficacy, high safety, less secondary injury than other treatments, and a wide range of indications and that it could accurately distinguish patients who did not need spinal canal decompression after posterior fixation. PPSF combined with selective TED is therefore a good choice for the treatment of TLBF.

Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation combined with transforaminal endoscopic spinal canal decompression for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture with severe neurologic deficit: A case report

RATIONALE

The most common fractures of the spine are associated with the thoracolumbar junction (T10-L2). And burst fractures make up 15% of all traumatic thoracolumbar fractures, which are often accompanied by neurological deficits and require open surgeries. Common surgeries include either anterior, posterior or a combination of these approaches. Here, we report the first attempt to treat thoracolumbar burst fracture (TLBF) with severe neurologic deficits by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) and transforaminal endoscopic spinal canal decompression (TESCD).

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 46-year-old Chinese woman suffered from severe lower back pain with grade 0 muscle strength of lower limbs, without any sensory function below the injury level, with an inability to urinate or defecate after a motor vehicle accident. Imaging studies confirmed that she had Magerl type A 3.2 L1 burst fracture.

DIAGNOSES

Burst fracture at L1.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent PPSF at the level of T12 to L2, but her neurological function did not fully recover after the operation. One week after the injury, we performed TESCD on her.

OUTCOMES

There was an immediate improvement in her neurological function in just 1 day after 2-stage operation. During the 6-month follow-up period, her neurological functions gradually recovered, and she was able to defecate and urinate. At the last follow-up visit, her spinal cord function was assessed to be at Frankel grade D.

LESSONS

PPSF plus TESCD can achieve complete spinal cord decompression, promote neurological recovery, and is therefore an effective method for the treating lumbar burst fractures with severe neurologic deficits.

Traumatic Fractures of the Thoracic Spine

The majority of traumatic vertebral fractures occur at the thoracolumbar junction and the lumbar spine and less commonly at the mid-thoracic and upper thoracic spine. In accordance, a high number of articles are dealing with thoracolumbar fractures focusing on the thoracolumbar junction. Nonetheless, the biomechanics of the thoracic spine differ from the thoracolumbar junction and the lumbar vertebral spine. The aim of this review is to screen the literature dealing with acute traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures in patients with normal bone quality. Thereby, the diagnostic of thoracic vertebral body fractures should include a CT examination. Ideally, the CT should include the whole thoracic cage particularly in patients suffering high energy accidents or in those with clinical suspicion of concomitant thoracic injuries. Generally, concomitant thoracic injuries are frequently seen in patients with thoracic spine fractures. Particularly sternal fractures cause an increase in fracture instability. In case of doubt, long segment stabilization is recommended in patients with unstable mid- und upper thoracic fractures, particularly in those patients with a high grade of instability.

Does Combined Anterior-Posterior Approach Improve Outcomes Compared with Posterioronly Approach in Traumatic Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures?: A Systematic Review

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the surgical, radiological, and functional outcomes of posterior-only versus combined anterior-posterior approaches in patients with traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. The ideal approach (anterior-only, posterior-only, or combined anterior-posterior) for the surgical management of thoracolumbar burst fracture remains controversial, with each approach having its advantages and disadvantages. A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed (registration no., CRD42018115120). The authors reviewed comparative studies evaluating posterior-only approach compared with combined anterior-posterior approaches with respect to clinical, surgical, radiographic, and functional outcome measures. Five retrospective cohort studies were included. Postoperative neurological deterioration was not reported in either group. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and postoperative length of stay were increased among patients in the combined anterior-posterior group in one study and equivalent between groups in another study. No significant difference was observed between the two approaches with regards to long-term postoperative Cobb angle (mean difference, -0.2; 95% confidence interval, -5.2 to 4.8; p =0.936). Moreover, no significant difference in functional patient outcomes was observed in the 36item Short-Form Health Survey, Visual Analog Scale, and return-to-work rates between the two groups. The available evidence does not indicate improved clinical, radiologic (including kyphotic deformity), and functional outcomes in the combined anterior-posterior and posterior-only approaches in the management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures. Further studies are required to ascertain if a subset of patients will benefit from a combined anterior-posterior approach.

Reducing Radiation and Lowering Costs With a Standardized Care Pathway for Nonoperative Thoracolumbar Fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

There is marked variation in the management of nonoperative thoracolumbar (TL) compression and burst fractures. This was a quality improvement study designed to establish a standardized care pathway for TL fractures treated with bracing, and to then evaluate differences in radiographs, length of stay (LOS), and cost before and after the pathway.

METHODS

A standardized pathway was established for management of nonoperative TL burst and compression fractures (AOSpine classification type A1-A4 fractures). Bracing, radiographs, costs, complications, and LOS before and after pathway adoption were analyzed. Differences between the neurosurgery and orthopedic spine services were compared.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2015, 406 nonoperative burst and compression TL fractures were identified. A total of 183 (45.1%) were braced, 60.6% with a custom-made thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) and 39.4% with an off-the-shelf TLSO. The number of radiographs significantly reduced after initiation of the pathway (3.23 vs 2.63, P = .010). A total of 98.6% of braces were custom-made before the pathway; 69.6% were off-the-shelf after the pathway. The total cost for braced patients after pathway adoption decreased from $10 462.36 to $8928.58 (P = .078). Brace-associated costs were significantly less for off-the-shelf TSLO versus custom TLSO ($1352.41 vs $3719.53, respectively, P < .001). The mean LOS and complication rate did not change significantly following pathway adoption. The orthopedic spine service braced less frequently than the neurosurgery service (40.7% vs 52.2%, P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized care pathways can reduce cost and radiation exposure without increasing complication rates in nonoperative management of thoracolumbar compression and burst fractures.

Spinal injuries in airborne accidents: a demographic overview of 148 patients in a level-1 trauma center

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the type and severity of spinal injury in airborne sports, as well as patients demographics in this unique set of athletes. Paragliding is one of the most popular airborne sports in Switzerland, which thought to be no less dangerous with a high potential for spinal injury. Few studies on spinal column injuries have been performed in these high-risk athletes with only inconsistent findings.

METHODS

Patient charts were analyzed for all airborne sports injuries affecting the spine from 2010 to 2017 at a level-1 trauma center in Switzerland. To classify the injuries, we used the newest AOSpine classification, ASIA-grading and the injury severity score (ISS). In total, 235 patients were admitted to the emergency department due to an airborne injury. A total of 148 patients (148/235, 63.0%) which were predominantly male (125/235, 84.5%) at a mean age of 39.4 years suffered 334 spinal fractures and 5 spinal contusions. The mean ISS was 17.3, and the L1 vertebra was most commonly affected (47.6% of cases, 68/148).

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients (54.5% or 78/148) required spine surgery due to instability or neurological deficits (31/148 patients; 20.9%). Concomitant injuries were identified in 64.2% of cases (n = 95).

CONCLUSION

Due to the increasing popularity of airborne sports, age of patients and severity of injuries (ISS) increased compared with the literature. The thoracolumbal spine is at especially high risk. To prevent further complications, the treatment procedure has to be sought carefully and algorithm should be introduced in clinics to avoid delay in diagnostics and surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Is cast an option in the treatment of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures?

Background:

Thoracolumbar vertebral fractures are common in high-energy trauma and often are associated to other concomitant injuries. Currently, brace and Closed Reduction and Casting (CRC) are the two conservative treatments proposed by literature. Despite CRC was widely used in the past, today brace is preferred. The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical and radiographic outcomes of thoracolumbar type A fractures, not associated with other injuries, treated with CRC.

Materials and Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated all patients treated from 2008 to 2015, with a mean age of 26.69 years (range 15–45). All patients were affected by AO type A fracture: 26 type A1, 17 type A2, and 21 type A3. All patients were evaluated by X-ray, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Radiological evaluations included vertebral kyphosis (VK), segmental kyphosis (SK), regional kyphosis (RK) angle, and vertebral ratio (VR) measures. Patients were clinically assessed through visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Short Form 36 Health Survey.

Results:

Seventy-four patients (41 males and 33 females) were included in the study. At follow-up (mean 28.48 months ± 5.16), we found significant improvements in VK (P = 0.000013), SK (P = 0.000455), and RK (P = 0.000016). No significant differences were observed in VR (P = 0.26). Good clinical results were reported in patients in all scores and 90.7% of patients returned to work.

Conclusions:

Closed reduction and casting is still a reliable treatment option in selected thoracolumbar fractures without spinal cord involvement. A correct fracture evaluation, patient compliance, and motivation are essentials.

Level of evidence:

IV.

Predictors of adverse discharge disposition in adult spinal deformity and associated costs

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

With advances in the understanding of adult spinal deformity (ASD), more complex osteotomy and fusion techniques are being implemented with increasing frequency. Patients undergoing ASD corrections infrequently require extended acute care, longer inpatient stays, and are discharged to supervised care. Given the necessity of value-based health care, identification of clinical indicators of adverse discharge disposition in ASD surgeries is paramount.

PURPOSE

Using the nationwide and surgeon-created databases, the present study aimed to identify predictors of adverse discharge disposition after ASD surgeries and view the corresponding differences in charges.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective analysis of patients on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and of cost data from Medicare PearlDiver Database.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgery for correction of ASD were included in the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary analysis was performed to compare patients discharged to home with patients who either expired or were discharged to locations other than home. Secondary analysis was performed to determine the cost differences across discharge groups.

METHODS

Patients on NSQIP undergoing thoracolumbar ASD-corrective surgery with a primary diagnosis of scoliosis (ICD-9 code 737.x) and over the age of 18 were isolated. Predictors (demographic, clinical, and complications) of not-home (NH; rehab or skilled nursing facility) discharge were analyzed using binary logistic regression controlling for levels fused, decompressions, osteotomies, and revisions. Average 30- and 90-day costs of care were reported in home, rehab, and skilled nursing facility discharge groups in patients undergoing 8+ level thoracolumbar fusion.

RESULTS

A total of 1,978 patients undergoing lumbar ASD-corrective surgery were included for analysis (average age: 59.3 years, sex: 64% female). Average length of stay was 6.58 days. On multivariate regression analysis, age over 60 years (odds ratio [OR]: 0.28, confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.34) and female sex (p=.003) were independent predictors of adverse discharge status. Partially dependent preoperational functional status, defined as reliance on another person to complete some activities of daily living, increased likelihood of adverse discharge disposition (OR: 0.57, CI: 0.35-0.90). Despite controlling for all clinical variables except for the ones specific to each analysis, Smith-Petersen osteotomy (OR: 0.51, CI: 0.40-0.64), interbody device placement (OR: 0.80, CI: 0.64-0.98), and fixation to the iliac (OR: 0.54, CI: 0.41-0.70) increased the likelihood of adverse discharge. Complications most associated with adverse discharge were urinary tract infections (OR: 0.34, CI: 0.21-0.57) and blood transfusions (OR: 0.42, CI: 0.34-0.52). Relative to home discharge, 30-day costs of care were +$21,061 more expensive in rehab discharges, but not different in skilled nursing facility discharges (+$5,791, p=.177). The 90-day costs of care were $23,815 in rehab discharges (p<.001), but again not different from skilled nursing facility discharges (+$6,091, p=.212).

CONCLUSIONS

Discharge destination to rehabilitation has a significant impact on the cost of thoracolumbar ASD surgeries. Patient selection can predict patients at higher risk of discharges to rehab or skilled nursing facility.

The shape and mobility of the thoracic spine in asymptomatic adults - A systematic review of in vivo studies

A comprehensive knowledge of the thoracic shape and kinematics is essential for effective risk prevention, diagnose and proper management of thoracic disorders and assessment of treatment or rehabilitation strategies as well as for in silico and in vitro models for realistic applications of boundary conditions. After an extensive search of the existing literature, this study summarizes 45 studies on in vivo thoracic kyphosis and kinematics and creates a systematic and detailed database. The thoracic kyphosis over T1-12 determined using non-radiological devices (34°) was relatively less than measured using radiological devices (40°) during standing. The majority of kinematical measurements are based on non-radiological devices. The thoracic range of motion (RoM) was greatest during axial rotation (40°), followed by lateral bending (26°), and flexion (21°) when determined using non-radiological devices during standing. The smallest RoM was identified during extension (13°). The lower thoracic level (T8-12) contributed more to the RoM than the upper (T1-4) and middle (T4-8) levels during flexion and lateral bending. During axial rotation and extension, the middle level (T4-8) contributed the most. Coupled motion was evident, mostly during lateral bending and axial rotation. With aging, the thoracic kyphosis increased by about 3° per decade, whereas the RoM decreased by about 5° per decade for all load directions. These changes with aging mainly occurred in the lower region (T6-12). The influence of sex on thoracic kyphosis and the RoM has been described as partly contradictory. Obesity was found to decrease the thoracic RoM. Studies comparing standing, sitting and lying reported the effect of posture as significant.

Outcomes in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures With a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Score (TLICS) of 4 Treated With Surgery Versus Initial Conservative Management

STUDY DESIGN

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether surgery or nonoperative treatment has better clinical outcomes in neurologically intact patients with an intermediate severity thoracolumbar burst fracture.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Optimal management, whether initial operative or nonoperative treatment, for thoracolumbar injury classification score (TLICS) 4 burst fractures remains controversial. Better insight into the treatment which affords patients a better clinical outcome could significantly affect patient care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive cases of TLICS 4 burst fracture patients from 2007 to 2013 and minimum 6-month follow-up. Potential confounders examined included age, sex, injury severity score, initial kyphotic angle, injured facets, and interspinous widening. Outcomes were determined by standardized questionnaires [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Physical Component Score (SF-12 PCS), and back pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)] and analyzed using regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients with burst fractures were identified, of which 67/230 (29%) were TLICS 4 and 47/67 (70%) had completed follow-up. No difference on univariate analysis was found between nonsurgical and surgical groups in mean ODI scores (P=0.27, t test), nor mean time to return to work (P=0.10, t test).Regarding outcomes, linear regression analysis revealed no association between having surgery and ODI (P=0.29), SF-12 PCS (P=0.59), or VAS (P=0.33). Furthermore, no difference was found between groups for employed patients working versus not working (P=0.09, the Fisher test), nor in mean time to return to work (P=0.30, Cox regression).

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the largest studies examining TLICS 4 burst fracture patients, adjusting for both clinical and radiologic confounders and reporting patient outcomes with minimum 6-month follow-up. No differences were found in outcomes between patients treated either surgically or nonsurgically. Studies focusing on early postoperative differences or cost-effectiveness might help in decision making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Short-segment decompression and fixation for thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures with neurological deficits

Objective

We assessed our results of short-segment decompression and fixation for osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficits.

Methods

We evaluated 20 elderly patients (age, 60–89 years; mean, 73.2 years) with osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures and neurological deficits. They underwent short-segment decompression and fixation and followed up for 40.6 (range, 24–68) months. A visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to measure back pain and disability. We also analyzed patients’ radiologic findings and neurological status. Perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

Results

At the latest follow-up, the average VAS score for back pain and ODI scores had significantly improved. The radiologic assessment showed significant improvements in local kyphosis, anterior vertebral height, and the vertebral wedge angle compared with the original measures. Neurological function also improved in 18 of 20 patients. No major complications occurred perioperatively. Our techniques included preservation of the posterior ligament complex, decortication of facet joints for fusion, no tapping to increase the screw insertional torque, pre-contouring of the rods according to the “adaptive” curve obtained from postural reduction, and postoperative spinal bracing.

Conclusions

Posterior short-segment decompression and fixation could be an effective surgical option for osteoporotic thoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological deficits.

Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Thoracolumbar burst fractures are high-energy vertebral injuries, which commonly can be treated nonoperatively. Consideration of the injury pattern, extent of comminution, neurological status, and integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex may help determine whether operative management is appropriate. Several classification systems are contingent upon these factors to assist with clinical decision-making. A multitude of operative procedures have been shown to have good radiographic and clinical outcomes with extended follow-up, and treatment choice should be based on the individual's clinical and radiographic presentation.

Comparison of surgical or nonsurgical treatment outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar fracture with Score 4 of TLICS: A randomized, single-blind, and single-central clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Thoracolumbar fractures are among the most common types of damages caused to the spinal cord .Therefore, the aim of this study was the comparison of surgical or nonsurgical treatment outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar fracture with score 4 of the thoracolumbar injury classification and severity (TLICS) METHODS:: This study was clinical trial and double blind. Patients with thoracolumbar fracture with score 4 of TLICS entered at this research. We divided patients in 2 groups randomly (each group 25 patients) and then we followed patients for 1 year after start of treatment. We checked duration of bedridden and absence work, pain every 3 months for 1 year and radiography every 3 months for 1 year.

RESULTS

Pain in operative group was lower than nonoperative group (P = .02). Regional sagittal angles (RSA) in operative group was lower than nonoperative group in all time (P = .0001). Mean of time of return to work in operative group was lower than nonoperative group (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain and mean of time of return to work and RSA in operative group was lower than nonoperative group. The present data suggest the use of operative method in patients with thoracolumbar fracture with score 4 of TLICS.

Non neurologic burst thoracolumbar fractures fixation: Case-control study

STUDY DESIGN

Burst fractures not associated with any neurological deficits are frequent but not therapeutic agreement on their management is available to date. This case-control study was conducted to try to help guide therapeutic decision in the treatment of such fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This case-control study includes consecutive retrospective evaluation of 25 case-patients treated by posterior short-segment fixation associated with kyphoplasty (SFK) in the treatment of A3 thoracolumbar unstable fractures, as compared to a control-group composed of 82 patients treated by long-segment (LF) pedicle screws.

RESULTS

SFK patients bled significantly less than the LF patients (p=0.04). Assessment of deformation progression, vertebral height restoration and reduction of the regional kyphotic angle in the SFK and LF groups revealed no statistically significant superiority of one approach on another. In contrast, the height of endplates was significantly increased in the SFK group (p=0.006). The patients' pain levels were significantly improved in the SFK group (p=0.002). However, patients from the SFK group stood earlier postoperatively (1.7 vs 3.7days, p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

We believe that SFK in vertebral fractures is as efficient as LF for bone consolidation and spine stabilization. In addition, SFK patients may use fewer analgesics.

Spine Trauma-What Are the Current Controversies?

Although less common than other musculoskeletal injuries, spinal trauma may lead to significantly more disability and costs. During the last 2 decades there was substantial improvement in our understanding of the basic patterns of spinal fractures leading to more reliable classification and injury severity assessment systems but also rapid developments in surgical techniques. Despite these advancements, there remain unresolved issues concerning the management of these injuries. At this moment there is persistent controversy within the spinal trauma community, which can be grouped under 6 headings. First of all there is still no unanimity on the role and timing of medical and surgical interventions for patients with associated neurologic injury. The same is also true for type and timing of surgical intervention in multiply injured patients. In some common injury types like odontoid fractures and burst type (A3-A4) fractures in thoracolumbar spine, there is wide variation in practice between operative versus nonoperative management without clear reasons. Also, the role of different surgical approaches and techniques in certain injury types are not clarified yet. Methods of nonoperative management and care of elderly patients with concurrent complex disorders are also areas where there is no consensus. In this overview article the main reasons for these controversies are reviewed and the possible ways for resolutions are discussed.

Does Surgical Intervention or Timing of Surgery Have an Effect on Neurological Recovery in the Setting of a Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture?

Traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures are one of the most common forms of spinal trauma with the majority occurring at the junctional area where mechanical load is maximal (AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System Subtype A3 or A4). Burst fractures entail the involvement of the middle column, and therefore, they are typically associated with bone fragment in the spinal canal, which may cause compression of the spinal cord, conus medullaris, cauda equina, or a combination of these. Fortunately, approximately half of the patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures are neurologically intact due to the wide canal diameter. Recent evidences have revealed that functional outcomes in the long term may be equivalent between operative and nonoperative management for neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures. Nevertheless, consensus has not been met regarding the optimal treatment strategy for those with neurological deficits. The present review article summarizes the contemporary evidences to discuss the role of nonoperative management in the presence of neurological deficits and the optimal timing of decompression surgery for neurological recovery. In summary, although operative management is generally recommended for thoracolumbar fracture with significant neurological deficits, the evidence is weak, and nonoperative management can also be an option for those with solitary radicular symptoms. With regards to timing of operative management, high-quality studies comparing early and delayed intervention are lacking. Extrapolating from the evidence in cervical spine injury leads to an assumption that early intervention would also be beneficial for neurological recovery, but further studies are warranted to answer these questions.

Comparison of the Posterior Vertebral Column Resection With the Expandable Cage Versus the Nonexpandable Cage in Thoracolumbar Angular Kyphosis

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the radiographic and clinical results of anterior support with nonexpandable cage with those of expandable cage.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The goals of surgical treatment in patients with thoracolumbar angular kyphosis are to improve the neurological deficit through neural decompression, to restore the normal alignment by correction of deformity, and to stabilize the spinal column by arthrodesis. Mesh cages have been traditionally used for reconstruction after corpectomy. However, expandable cages are gaining popularity due to some advantages over mesh cages, structural autograft or allograft, and poly-ether-ether-ketone/carbon fiber.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective study in a consecutive series of 42 subjects with a male-to-female ratio of 15:27, a mean age of 65.3±10.9 years, and a mean follow-up period of 36.4±7.1 months, who underwent posterior vertebral column resection at our medical institutions between 2006 and 2011. They consist of 32 patients with posttraumatic kyphosis with a mean kyphotic angle of 33.1 degrees (range, 12.2-58.1 degrees) and 10 patients with tuberculous kyphosis with a mean kyphotic angle of 53.9 degrees (range, 22.6-126.0 degrees). The mean follow-up period was 36.4 months (range, 28-54 mo). We compared the clinical outcomes between the 2 groups based on radiographic findings, neurological status, and complications. Intervertebral heights and kyphosis at the level of vertebral column resection were used to measure the radiographic outcomes. Neurological outcome was evaluated using the modified Frankel grading system.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the mean kyphosis angle was 3.0±10.8 and 6.7±7.2 degrees (P=0.094). At a final follow-up, these values were 4.7±10.1 and 12.3±18.9 degrees in the corresponding order (P=0.099). There were 19 (80.0%) and 21 (86.4%) patients with solid arthrodesis of grade 1. On modified Frankel grading system, all the patients but one achieved improvement. But there was no significant difference in the grade between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Also in our series, there were 12 patients with cage subsidence and 6 with screw loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonexpandable cage and expandable cage are viable options for anterior support; both cages allow for correction of kyphosis with good fusion rate with similar neurological outcomes. Expandable cage is effective for the anterior support of posterior vertebral column resection.

Perioperative morbidity and mortality after lumbar trauma in the elderly

OBJECT Traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine are common injuries, accounting for approximately 90% of all spinal trauma. Lumbar spine trauma in the elderly is a growing public health problem with relatively little evidence to guide clinical management. The authors sought to characterize the complications, morbidity, and mortality associated with surgical and nonsurgical management in elderly patients with traumatic fractures of the lumbar spine. METHODS Using the National Sample Program of the National Trauma Data Bank, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients ≥ 55 years of age who had traumatic fracture to the lumbar spine. This group was divided into middle-aged (55-69 years) and elderly (≥ 70 years) cohorts. Cohorts were subdivided into nonoperative, vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, noninstrumented surgery, and instrumented surgery. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to characterize and identify predictors of medical and surgical complications, mortality, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, number of days on ventilator, and hospital discharge in each subgroup. Adjusted odds ratios, mean differences, and associated 95% CIs were reported. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05, and the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was applied for each outcome analysis. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2012, 22,835 people met the inclusion criteria, which represents 94,103 incidents nationally. Analyses revealed a similar medical and surgical complication profile between age groups. The most prevalent medical complications were pneumonia (7.0%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (3.6%), and deep venous thrombosis (3%). Surgical site infections occurred in 6.3% of cases. Instrumented surgery was associated with the highest odds of each complication (p < 0.001). The inpatient mortality rate was 6.8% for all subjects. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that age ≥ 70 years was an independent predictor of mortality (OR 3.16, 95% CI 2.77-3.60), whereas instrumented surgery (multivariable OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.28-0.52) and vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.45) were associated with decreased odds of death. In surviving patients, both older age (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.30-0.34) and instrumented fusion (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.33-0.41) were associated with decreased odds of discharge to home. CONCLUSIONS The present study confirms that lumbar surgery in the elderly is associated with increased morbidity. In particular, instrumented fusion is associated with periprocedural complications, prolonged hospitalization, and a decreased likelihood of being discharged home. However, fusion surgery is also associated with reduced mortality. Age alone should not be an exclusionary factor in identifying surgical candidates for instrumented lumbar spinal fusion. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Microscope-assisted endoscopic interlaminar ligation of spinal arteriovenous fistulas: technical note

Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (SDAVFs) are the most common type of spinal arteriovenous malformations, and microsurgical ligation is the treatment modality most frequently used for these lesions. Developments in endoscopic techniques have made endoscopy an even less invasive alternative to routine microsurgical approaches in spine surgery, but endoscopic management of SDAVF or other intradural spinal lesions has not been reported to date. The authors describe the use of a microscope-assisted endoscopic interlaminar approach for the ligation of the proximal draining vein of an L-1 SDAVF in a 58-year-old man. A complete cure was confirmed by postoperative angiography. The postoperative course was uneventful, and short-term follow-up showed improvements in the patient's neurological function. The authors conclude that the endoscopic interlaminar approach with microscope assistance is a safe, minimally invasive, innovative technique for the surgical management of SDAVFs in selected patients.

Nonoperative Management in Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The identification of factors that lead to the failure of nonoperative management in neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBF) can be controversial, particularly in the neurologically intact. Surgery for intact burst fractures has been advocated for early mobilization and a shorter hospital stay. These goals, however, have not always been achieved, rejuvenating an interest in nonoperative treatment.

METHODS

Sixty-eight neurologically intact patients with burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2), and a thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) of 2, were treated at our institution. Based on CT scans, patients were scored based on the load-sharing classification (LSC) scale. Initial treatment consisted of bracing in clamshell thoracolumbar orthosis and gradual mobilization.

RESULTS

Owing to pain limiting mobilization, 18 patients failed nonoperative management and required instrumentation. Those who failed nonsurgical management were significantly more kyphotic (8° ± 10) and stenotic (52% ± 14%) than those successfully treated nonoperatively (3° ± 7 and 63 ± 12%, respectively). The LSC score of those undergoing surgery (6.9 ± 1.1) was also greater than those successfully treated nonoperatively (5.8 ± 1.3, P = 0.006). Length of hospitalization was longer, and hospital charges higher in those requiring surgery compared to the nonoperative group. At follow-up there was no difference between groups in the visual analog score for pain (VAS) or the Oswestry disability index.

CONCLUSION

Owing to pain limiting mobilization, a quarter of neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures and a TLICS score of 2 failed nonsurgical management. The greater the kyphosis, stenosis, and fragmentation of the fracture, the more likely patients required surgery. In addition to the TLICS classification, other radiographic and clinical parameters should be included in selecting appropriate treatment strategy. The cost savings with nonoperative treatment of intact burst fractures, when appropriate, are significant.

Decision-Making Process in Patients with Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Burst Fractures with Thoracolumbar Injury Severity and Classification Score Less than Four

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

PURPOSE

To develop a strategy to determine a sound method for decision-making based on postoperative clinical outcome satisfaction.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

The ideal management of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures (TLBF) without neurological compromise remains controversial.

METHODS

This was a prospective study. Patients with thoracolumbar injury severity and classification score (TLICS) <4 were treated nonoperatively, with bed rest and bracing until the pain decreased sufficiently to allow mobilization. Surgery was undertaken in patients with intractable pain despite an appropriate nonoperative treatment (surgery group). The Oswestry disability index (ODI) measure was observed at baseline and at the last follow-up. Clinically success was defined at least a 30% improvement from the baseline ODI scores in both the conservative and surgery groups. All case records were assessed for gender, age, residual canal and angulations at the site of the fracture in order to determine which patients benefited from surgery or conservative treatment and which did not.

RESULTS

In all 113 patients with T11-L5, TLBFs were treated. The patients' mean age was 49.2 years. Patients successfully completed either nonoperative (n=99) or surgical (n=14) treatment based on ODI. Clinical examinations revealed that all of the patients had intact neurology. The mean follow-up period was 29.5 months. There was a significant difference between the two groups based on age and residual canal. The mean ODI score significantly improved for both groups (p <0.01). According to the findings, a decision matrix was proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings confirm that TLICS <4, age, and residual canal can be used to guide the treatment of TLBF in conservative decision-making.

Short Segment Spinal Instrumentation With Index Vertebra Pedicle Screw Placement for Pathologies Involving the Anterior and Middle Vertebral Column Is as Effective as Long Segment Stabilization With Cage Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro, cadaveric biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare single-segment posterior instrumentation and fracture-level screws with single/multilevel posterior fixation and corpectomy in a simulated, unstable burst fracture model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal extent of instrumentation for surgical cases of non-neoplastic vertebral body pathologies remains uncertain. Although several clinical studies demonstrate advantages of short segment instrumentation with index-level screws over more extensive corpectomy and anterior-posterior techniques, a comprehensive biomechanical comparison of these techniques is currently lacking.

METHODS

Six bovine spines (T11-L5) were tested in flexion, extension, lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) following simulated burst fracture at L2. Posterior instrumentation included 1 level above/below (1LF) and 2 levels above/below fracture level (2LF), intermediate or index screws at fracture level (FF), and cross-connectors above/below fracture level (CC). Anterior corpectomy devices included expandable corpectomy spacers with/without integrated screws, ACDi and ACD, respectively FORTIFY-Integrated/FORTIFY; Globus Medical, Inc., PA. Constructs were tested in the following order: (1) Intact; (2) 1LF; (3) 1LF and CC; (4) 1LF and FF; (5) 1LF, CC, and FF; (6) 2LF; (7) 2LF and CC; (8) 2LF and FF; (9) 2LF, CC, and FF; (10) 2LF and ACD; (11) 2LF, ACD, and CC; (12) 1LF and ACDi; (13) 1LF, ACDi, and CC.

RESULTS

During flexion, all constructs except 1LF reduced motion relative to intact (P ≤ 0.05). Anterior support was most stable, but no differences were found between constructs (P ≥ 0.05). Every construct reduced motion in extension, though no differences were found between constructs and intact (P ≥ 0.05). During LB, all constructs reduced motion relative to intact (P ≤ 0.05); 2LF constructs further reduced motion (P ≤ 0.05). No construct returned AR motion to intact, with significant increases in 1LF and ACDi, 2LF and ACD, and 2LF, ACD, and CC (P ≤ 0.05). Cross-connectors and fracture screws reinforced each other in posterior-only constructs, providing maximum stability (P ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This biomechanical comparison study found no significant superiority of combined anterior-posterior constructs over short segment fracture screw fixation, only multilevel posterior instrumentation with and without anterior support, providing increased stability in LB. Biomechanical equivalency suggests that short segment fracture screw intervention may provide appropriate stabilization for non-neoplastic pathologies involving the anterior and middle vertebral columns.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Is there a regional difference in morphology interpretation of A3 and A4 fractures among different cultures?

OBJECT The aim of this study was to determine if the ability of a surgeon to correctly classify A3 (burst fractures with a single endplate involved) and A4 (burst fractures with both endplates involved) fractures is affected by either the region or the experience of the surgeon. METHODS A survey was sent to 100 AOSpine members from all 6 AO regions of the world (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East) who had no prior knowledge of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Respondents were asked to classify 25 cases, including 6 thoracolumbar burst fractures (A3 or A4). This study focuses on the effect of region and experience on surgeons' ability to properly classify these 2 controversial fracture variants. RESULTS All 100 surveyed surgeons completed the survey, and no significant regional (p > 0.50) or experiential (p > 0.21) variability in the ability to correctly classify burst fractures was identified; however, surgeons from all regions and with all levels of experience were more likely to correctly classify A3 fractures than A4 fractures (p < 0.01). Further analysis demonstrated that no region predisposed surgeons to increasing their assessment of severity of burst fractures. CONCLUSIONS A3 and A4 fractures are the most difficult 2 fractures to correctly classify, but this is not affected by the region or experience of the surgeon; therefore, regional variations in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures (A3 and A4) is not due to differing radiographic interpretation of the fractures.

A Worldwide Analysis of the Reliability and Perceived Importance of an Injury to the Posterior Ligamentous Complex in AO Type A Fractures

Study Design Survey of spine surgeons. Objective To determine the reliability with which international spine surgeons identify a posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury in a patient with a compression-type vertebral body fracture (type A). Methods A survey was sent to all AOSpine members from the six AO regions of the world. The survey consisted of 10 cases of type A fractures (2 subtype A1, 2 subtype A2, 3 subtype A3, and 3 subtype A4 fractures) with appropriate imaging (plain radiographs, computed tomography, and/or magnetic resonance imaging), and the respondent was asked to identify fractures with a PLC disruption, as well as to indicate if the integrity of the PLC would affect their treatment recommendation. Results Five hundred twenty-nine spine surgeons from all six AO regions of the world completed the survey. The overall interobserver reliability in determining the integrity of the PLC was slight (kappa = 0.11). No substantial regional or experiential difference was identified in determining PLC integrity or its absence; however, a regional difference was identified (p < 0.001) in how PLC integrity influenced the treatment of type A fractures. Conclusion The results of this survey indicate that there is only slight international reliability in determining the integrity of the PLC in type A fractures. Although the biomechanical importance of the PLC is not in doubt, the inability to reliably determine the integrity of the PLC may limit the utility of the M1 modifier in the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.

Optical coherence tomography of traumatic aneurysms of the internal carotid artery: report of 2 cases

The pathophysiology of extracranial traumatic aneurysm formation has not been fully elucidated. Intraarterial optical coherence tomography (OCT), an imaging modality capable of micrometer cross-sectional resolution, was used to evaluate patients presenting with saccular traumatic aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (ICA). Two consecutive trauma patients diagnosed with saccular traumatic aneurysms of the cervical ICA, per the institutional screening protocol for traumatic cerebrovascular injury, underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with OCT. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated disruption of the intima with preservation and stretching of the more peripheral layers. In 1 patient the traumatic aneurysm was associated with thrombus formation and a separate, more proximal dissection not visible on CT angiography (CTA) or DSA. Imaging with OCT indicates that saccular traumatic aneurysms may develop from disruption of the intima with at least partial preservation of the media and adventitia. This provides in vivo evidence that saccular traumatic aneurysms result from a partial arterial wall tear rather than complete disruption. Interestingly, OCT was also able to detect arterial injury and thrombi not visible on CTA or DSA.

Establishing the injury severity of thoracolumbar trauma: confirmation of the hierarchical structure of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System

STUDY DESIGN

Survey of spine surgeons.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a validated regional and global injury severity scoring system for thoracolumbar trauma.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System was recently published and combines elements of both the Magerl system and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System; however, the injury severity of each fracture has yet to be established.

METHODS

A survey was sent to 100 AOSpine members from all 6 AO regions of the world (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East). Each respondent was asked to numerically grade the severity of each variable of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System including the morphology, neurological grade, and patient specific modifiers. A grade of zero was considered to be not severe at all, and a grade of 100 was the most severe injury possible.

RESULTS

Seventy-four AOSpine surgeons from all 6 AO regions of the world numerically graded the severity of each variable of the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System to establish the injury severity score. The reported fracture severity increased significantly (P < 0.0001) as the subtypes of fracture type A and type B increased, and a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in severity was established for burst fractures with involvement of 2 versus 1 endplates. Finally, no regional or experiential difference in severity or classification was identified.

CONCLUSION

Development of a globally applicable injury severity scoring system for thoracolumbar trauma is possible. This study demonstrates no regional or experiential difference in perceived severity or thoracolumbar spine trauma. The AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System provides a logical approach to assessing these injuries and enables rational strategies for treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.