Grade 2 meningioma and radiosurgery

Ki-67 labeling index predicts tumor progression patterns and survival in patients with atypical meningiomas following stereotactic radiosurgery

PURPOSE

This study investigated whether Ki-67 labeling index (LI) correlated with clinical outcomes after SRS for atypical meningiomas.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 39 patients with atypical meningiomas who underwent SRS over a 10-year study period. Ki-67 LI was categorized into 3 groups: low (< 5%), intermediate (5%-10%), and high (> 10%). Local tumor control rates (LCRs), progression-free rates (PFRs), disease-specific survival (DSS) rates, and adverse radiation-induced events (AREs) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up periods were 26 months. SRS was performed at a median prescription dose of 18 Gy for tumors with a median Ki-67 LI of 9.6%. The 3-year LCRs were 100%, 74%, and 25% in the low, intermediate, and high LI groups, respectively (p = 0.011). The 3-year PFRs were 100%, 40%, and 0% in the low, intermediate, and high LI groups (p = 0.003). The 5-year DSS rates were 100%, 89%, and 50% in the low, intermediate, and high LI groups (p = 0.019). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis showed a significant correlation of high LI with lower LCR (hazard ratio [HR], 3.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-13.04, p = 0.026), lower PFR (HR 3.80; 95% CI 1.46-9.88, p = 0.006), and shorter DSS (HR 6.55; 95% CI 1.19-35.95, p = 0.031) compared with intermediate LI. The ARE rates were minimal (8%) in the entire group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with high Ki-67 LI showed significantly more tumor progression and tumor-related death. Ki-67 LI might offer valuable predictive insights for the post-SRS management of atypical meningiomas.

Efficacy of radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery as adjuvant or salvage treatment in atypical and anaplastic (WHO grade II and III) meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The role of radiotherapy (RT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as adjuvant or salvage treatment in high-grade meningiomas (HGM) is still debated. Despite advances in modern neuro-oncology, HGM (WHO grade II and III) remains refractory to multimodal therapies. Published reports present aggregated data and are extremely varied in population size, exclusion criteria, selection bias, and inclusion of mixed histologic grades, making it extremely difficult to draw conclusions when taken individually. This current work aims to gather the existing evidence on RT and SRS as adjuvants following surgery or salvage treatment at recurrence after multimodality therapy failure and to conduct a systematic comparison between these two modalities. An extensive systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed. A total of 42 papers were eligible for final analysis (RT n = 27; SRS n = 15) after searching MEDLINE via PubMed, Web-of-science, Cochrane Wiley, and Embase databases. Adjuvant regimens were addressed in 37 papers (RT n = 26; SRS n = 11); salvage regimens were described in 5 articles (RT n = 1; SRS n = 4). The primary outcomes of the study were the overall recurrence rate and mortality. Other actuarial rates (local and distant control, OS, PFS, and complications) were retrieved and analyzed as secondary outcomes. A total of 2853 patients harboring 3077 HGM were included. The majority were grade II (87%) with a mean pre-radiation volume of 8.7 cc. Adjuvant regimen: 2742 patients (76.4% RT; 23.6% SRS) with an overall grade II/III rate of 6.6/1. Lesions treated adjSRS were more frequently grade III (17 vs 12%, p < 0.001), and received subtotal resection (57 vs 27%, p = 0.001) compared to the RT cohort. AdjSRS cohort had a significantly shorter mean follow-up than adjRT (36.7 vs 50.3 months, p = 0.01). The overall recurrence rate was 38% in adjRT vs 25% in adjSRS (p = 0.01), while mortality did not differ between the groups (20% vs 23%, respectively; p = 0.80). The median time to recurrence was 1.5 times longer in the RT group (p = 0.30). Five-year local control was 55% in adjRT and 26% in adjSRS (p = 0.01), while 5-year OS was 73% and 78% (p = 0.62), and 5-year PFS was 62% and 40% in adjRT and adjSRS (p = 0.008). No difference in the incidence of complications (24% vs 14%, p = 0.53). Salvage regimen: 110 patients (37.3% RT; 62.7% SRS) with a grade II/III rate of 8.6/1. The recurrence rate was 46% in salRT vs 24% in salSRS (p = 0.39), time to recurrence was 1.8 times longer in the salRT group (35 vs 18.5 months, p = 0.74). Mortality was slightly yet not significantly higher in salRT (34% vs 12%, p = 0.54). Data on local and distant control were only available for salSRS. The 5-year OS was 49% and 83% (p = 0.90), and the 5-year PFS was 39% and 50% in salRT and salSRS (p = 0.66), respectively. High-grade meningiomas (WHO grade II and III) receiving adjuvant RT showed a higher overall recurrence rate than meningiomas receiving adjuvant SRS. The adjRT cohort, however, achieved higher 5-year LC and PFS rates, thus suggesting a potentially longer time to recurrence compared to adjSRS patients, who, meanwhile, experienced a significantly shorter follow-up. This result must also consider the higher number of grade III lesions and the smaller extent of resection achieved in the adjSRS group. Overall mortality did not differ between the two groups. No differences in outcome measures were observed in salvage regimens.

Midline Skull Base Meningiomas: Transcranial and Endonasal Perspectives

Simple Summary

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. Over time, several corridors have been proposed, each one carrying its own pros and cons. During the last decades, the endoscopic endonasal route has been asserted among the classic routes for a growing number of midline and paramedian lesions. Therefore, the aim of our paper is to present a comprehensive review of the indications and techniques for the management of skull base meningiomas, emphasizing the ambivalent and complementary role of the low and high routes.

Abstract

Skull base meningiomas have always represented a challenge for neurosurgeons. Despite their histological nature, they may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to their deep-seated location and the surrounding neurovascular structures. The state of the art of skull base meningiomas accounts for both transcranial, or high, and endonasal, or low, routes. A comprehensive review of the pertinent literature was performed to address the surgical strategies and outcomes of skull base meningioma patients treated through a transcranial approach, an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA), or both. Three databases (PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Ovid Embase) have been searched. The review of the literature provided 328 papers reporting the surgical, oncological, and clinical results of different approaches for the treatment of skull base meningiomas. The most suitable surgical corridors for olfactory groove, tuberculum sellae, clival and petroclival and cavernous sinus meningiomas have been analyzed. The EEA was proven to be associated with a lower extent of resection rates and better clinical outcomes compared with transcranial corridors, offering the possibility of achieving the so-called maximal safe resection.

Trends in the use of radiation for meningioma across the United States

Purpose

Meningiomas are tumors originating from arachnoid cap cells on the surface of the brain or spinal cord. Treatment differs by grade but can consist of observation, surgery, radiation therapy or both. We utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to compare trends in the use stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the management of meningioma.

Materials and Methods

We queried the NCDB from 2004–2015 for meningioma patients (grade 1–3) treated with radiation therapy, either SRS or EBRT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of each treatment and to generate a propensity score. Propensity adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis and multivariable Cox hazards ratios were used to identify predictors of survival.

Results

We identified 5,406 patients with meningioma meeting above criteria with 45%, 44%, and 11% having World Health Organization (WHO) grade 1, 2, and 3 disease, respectively. Median follow up was 43 months. Predictors for SRS were grade 1 disease, distance from treatment facility, and histology. The only predictor of EBRT was grade 3 disease. Treatment year, histology, race and female sex were associated with improved survival. Five- and 10-year survival rates were 89.2% versus 72.6% (p < 0.0001) and 80.3% versus 61.4% (p = 0.29) for SRS and EBRT respectively. After propensity matching 226 pairs were generated. For SRS, 5-year survival was not significantly improved at 88.2% compared with EBRT (p = 0.056).

Conclusion

In the present analysis, predictors of SRS utilization in management of meningioma include WHO grade 1 disease, distance from treatment facility and histology whereas conventional EBRT utilization was associated with grade 2 and 3 disease. Future studies need to be performed in order to optimize management of atypical and malignant meningioma.

Progestin-related WHO grade II meningiomas behavior-a single-institution comparative case series

WHO grade II progestin-related meningiomas have been reported in recent series but we found no previous study describing their long-term outcome. Our study aimed to evaluate patients operated on for high-grade intracranial meningioma and who underwent long-term exposure to high dose of cyproterone acetate, nomegestrol acetate, and chlormadinone acetate. Our study retrospectively included 9 patients with high-grade progestin-related intracranial meningioma between December 2006 and September 2021. In each patient, clinico-radiological follow-up was performed every 6 months after diagnosis and treatment withdrawal recommendation. The mean progestative exposure was 11.4 years. Edema existence or absence of cleft sign on MRI were the key factors for surgical indication. All patients underwent surgery. Adjuvant radiotherapy was indicated in 1 patient, and Gamma Knife radiosurgery was proposed in 2 other patients for a second location of meningioma. Six patients harbored a grade II chordoid meningioma subtype with 100% PR expression and 3 patients a grade II atypical meningioma subtype with lower PR expression. The mean follow-up was 8.1 years and none of the 9 patients presented with a recurrence. Patients with grade II progestin-related meningiomas have less tumor recurrence after surgery than patients with sporadic grade II meningiomas, especially after progestin withdrawal. The presence/appearance of peri-meningioma edema and the absence of cleft sign before volumetric change should suggest the existence of an underlying WHO grade II meningiomas. In these cases, surgical resection may immediately be considered and adjuvant radiotherapy should be reserved for proven recurrence cases.

The role of single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for atypical meningiomas (WHO grade II): treatment results based on a 25-year experience

PURPOSE

To clarify the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for atypical meningiomas (AM).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 68 patients with AM having SRS from 1995 until 2019.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (28%) had undergone prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (median dose, 54 Gy). The median follow-up period was 52 months. Eighteen (26%), 17 (25%), and 33 (49%) patients received SRS as an upfront adjuvant (≤ 6 months), early salvage (7-18 months), or late salvage treatment (> 18 months), respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 52%, 35%, and 25%, respectively. The 3-, 5-, and 10-year disease-specific survivals were 85%, 78%, and 61%, respectively. Adverse radiation events (AREs) were observed in 12 patients (18%), with increased or new seizures being the most frequent complication (n = 7). Prior EBRT was associated with reduced PFS (HR 5.92, P < 0.01), reduced DSS (HR 5.84, P < 0.01), and an increased risk of ARE (HR 3.31, P = 0.04). Timing of SRS was correlated with reduced PFS for patients having early salvage treatment compared to upfront adjuvant (HR 3.17, P = 0.01) or late salvage treatment (HR 4.39, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

PFS for patients with residual/recurrent AM remains poor despite SRS. Prior EBRT was associated with worse tumor control, higher tumor-related mortality, and an increased risk of ARE. Further study on the timing of SRS is needed to determine if upfront adjunctive SRS improves tumor control compared to salvage SRS.

Advances in Multidisciplinary Management of Skull Base Meningiomas

The surgical management of Skull Base Meningiomas (SBMs) has radically changed over the last two decades. Extensive surgery for patients with SBMs represents the mainstream treatment; however, it is often challenging due to narrow surgical corridors and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Novel surgical technologies, including three-dimensional (3D) preoperative imaging, neuromonitoring, and surgical instruments, have gradually facilitated the surgical resectability of SBMs, reducing postoperative morbidity. Total removal is not always feasible considering a risky tumor location and invasion of surrounding structures and brain parenchyma. In recent years, the use of primary or adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has progressively increased due to its safety and efficacy in the control of grade I and II meningiomas, especially for small to moderate size lesions. Patients with WHO grade SBMs receiving subtotal surgery can be monitored over time with surveillance imaging. Postoperative management remains highly controversial for grade II meningiomas, and depends on the presence of residual disease, with optional upfront adjuvant radiation therapy or close surveillance imaging in cases with total resection. Adjuvant radiation is strongly recommended in patients with grade III tumors. Although the currently available chemotherapy or targeted therapies available have a low efficacy, the molecular profiling of SBMs has shown genetic alterations that could be potentially targeted with novel tailored treatments. This multidisciplinary review provides an update on the advances in surgical technology, postoperative management and molecular profile of SBMs.

Outcomes of salvage radiation for recurrent world health organization grade II meningiomas: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The optimal modality of radiation-intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-in patients with recurrent WHO grade II meningiomas is not well-established. The purpose of this study was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) in patients undergoing salvage IMRT vs SRS. We compared PFS in those with and without history of prior radiation.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with 71 tumor recurrences treated with IMRT or SRS were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two salvage treatments were performed on recurrent tumors never treated with prior radiation ('radiation-naïve' cohort), whereas 39 salvage treatments were performed on recurrent tumors previously treated with radiation ('re-treatment cohort').

RESULTS

In the 'radiation-naïve' cohort, 3-year PFS for IMRT and SRS was 68.8% and 60.7%, respectively (p = 0.61). The median tumor volume for patients treated with IMRT was significantly larger than for patients treated with SRS (5.7 vs 2.2 cm³; p = 0.04). The 3-year PFS for salvage IMRT or SRS in the 're-treatment' cohort was 45.4% vs 65.8% in the 'radiation-naïve' cohort (p = 0.008). When analyzing the outcome of multiple re-treatments, median PFS was 47 months for 1^st or 2nd salvage radiation (IMRT or SRS) compared to 16 months for the 3rd or greater salvage radiation treatment (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

For salvage radiation of recurrent grade II tumors that are 'radiation-naïve', comparable 3-year PFS rates were found between IMRT and SRS, despite the IMRT group having significantly larger tumors. Salvage radiation overall was less successful in the 're-treatment' cohort compared with the 'radiation-naïve' cohort. Additionally, the effectiveness of radiation significantly declines with successive salvage radiation treatments.

Proton Therapy for Intracranial Meningioma for the Treatment of Primary/Recurrent Disease Including Re-Irradiation

Meningeal tumors represent approximately 10-25% of primary brain tumors and occur usually in elderly female patients. Most meningiomas are benign (80-85%) and for symptomatic and/or large tumors, surgery, with or without radiation therapy (RT), has been long established as an effective means of local tumor control. RT can be delivered to inoperable lesions or to those with non-benign histology and for Simpson I-III and IV-V resection. RT can be delivered with photons or particles (protons or carbon ions) in stereotactic or non-stereotactic conditions. Particle therapy delivered for these tumors uses the physical properties of charged carbon ions or protons to spare normal brain tissue (i.e. Bragg peak), with or without or a dose-escalation paradigm for non-benign lesions. PT can substantially decrease the dose delivered to the non-target brain tissues, including but not limited to the hippocampi, optic apparatus or cochlea. Only a limited number of meningioma patients have been treated with PT in the adjuvant or recurrent setting, as well as for inoperable lesions with pencil beam scanning and with protons only. Approximately 500 patients with image-defined or WHO grade I meningioma have been treated with protons. The reported outcome, usually 5-year local tumor control, ranges from 85 to 99% (median, 96%). For WHO grade II or III patients, the outcome of only 97 patients has been published, reporting a median tumor local control rate of 52% (range, 38-71.1). Only 24 recurring patients treated previously with photon radiotherapy and re-treated with PT were reported. The clinical outcome of these challenging patients seems interesting, provided that they presented initially with benign tumors, are not in the elderly category and have been treated previously with conventional radiation dose of photons. Overall, the number of meningioma patients treated or-re-irradiated with this treatment modality is small and the clinical evidence level is somewhat low (i.e. 3b-5). In this review, we detail the results of upfront PT delivered to patients with meningioma in the adjuvant setting and for inoperable tumors. The outcome of meningioma patients treated with this radiation modality for recurrent tumors, with or without previous RT, will also be reviewed.

The effect of the revised WHO classification on the incidence of grade II meningioma

Introduction: A retrospective study over a three-year period at University Hospital of Wales (UHW) of the incidence of atypical cranial grade II meningioma both pre and post 2016 revision of The World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of tumours of the central nervous system.Subjects: All available histology from January 2015 to December 2017 of patients with cranial meningiomas.Method: Institutional online reporting system Welsh Clinical Portal to identify patients and view histology reports.Results: Overall 164 patient histology results were analysed (median age 59, age range 23-82, 74% females). There were 55 patients in 2015: 69.1% grade I, 29.1% grade II and 1.8% grade III. There were 109 patients in 2016/17; 68.8% grade I, 29.4% grade II, 1.8% grade III.Discussion: There is significant variability in the reported incidence of grade II meningioma, likely due to variation in local interpretation of diagnostic criteria. Neuropathologists at our institution have reported brain invasion as grade II prior to 2016. This was due to compelling published evidence that brain invasive meningiomas have recurrence and mortality rates similar to that of grade II meningioma as defined using other criteria. The new 2016 WHO criteria now recognise this specifically. As other institutions adapt to the amended 2016 guidelines we anticipate that there will be a greater consensus in line with our incidence rates of grade II meningioma.

Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients with Intracranial Meningiomas: impact of radiotherapy regimen on local control

We evaluated efficacy and tolerance of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation treatment (hFSRT) in the management of intracranial meningiomas. Between December 2008 and June 2016, 126 patients with 136 intracranial meningiomas were treated with robotic hFSRT. hFSRT was performed as primary irradiation and as a salvage option for the local recurrence after prior radiotherapy. The median prescription dose was 25 Gy (12–40) with a median number of fractions of 5 (3–10). After a median follow-up of 20.3 months (range 1–77 months), the 24-months local control (LC) rate was 81% in the primary hFSRT group and 39% after hFSRT in the re-irradiation group (p=0.002). The clinical control rate of symptoms in the overall population was 95% (95% CI: 89–98%). Progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population at 24 months was 70% (95% CI: 60%–79%). In the primary hFSRT group, PFS was significantly lower with the most hypofractionated schedules of 21–23 Gy in 3 fractions vs. 25–40 Gy in 5–10 fractions: 62% vs. 92% (p = 0.0006). The incidence of radionecrosis at 24 months was significantly lower in the primary hFSRT group, at 2% vs. 20% in the re-irradiation hFSRT group (p = 0.002).

Meningioma mimics: five key imaging features to differentiate them from meningiomas

There are a wide variety of intracranial mass lesions, both benign and malignant, which can closely mimic meningioma on imaging. We present five characteristic imaging features that can alert the radiologist to consider other differential diagnoses. Of the five imaging characteristics that were rarely seen in meningiomas, but common and specific for meningioma mimics, absence of dural tail is the most common (83.7%). Homogeneous T2 hyperintensity or T2 hypointensity are seen in nearly half of meningioma mimics and osseous destruction and leptomeningeal extension are present in 40.5% and 21.6% of meningioma mimics, respectively. The distinction between meningioma and its mimics is important because a large portion of the meningioma mimics requires substantially different clinical and surgical management.

Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Grade 2 Meningiomas

Purpose  This study aims to report long-term clinical outcomes after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for intracranial grade 2 meningiomas. Methods  In this Institutional Review Board approved study, we reviewed records of all patients with grade 2 meningiomas treated with GKRS between 1998 and 2014. Results  A total of 97 postoperative histopathologically confirmed grade 2 meningiomas in 75 patients were treated and are included in this study. After a mean follow-up of 41 months, 28 meningiomas had local recurrence (29.79%). Median time to local recurrence was 89 months (mean: 69, range: 47-168). The 3- and 5-year actuarial local control (LC) rates were 68.9 and 55.7%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 88.6 and 81.1%, respectively. There was a trend toward worse LC with tumors treated with radiation doses ≤ 13 versus > 13 Gy. There was no radiation necrosis or second malignant tumors noted in our series. Conclusion  This report, one of the largest GKRS series for grade 2 meningiomas, demonstrates that GKRS is a safe and effective treatment modality for patients with grade 2 meningiomas with durable tumor control and minimal toxicity. Adjuvant GKRS could be considered as a reasonable treatment approach for patients with grade 2 meningiomas.

Grade II meningiomas and Gamma Knife radiosurgery: analysis of success and failure to improve treatment paradigm

OBJECTIVE

Grade II meningiomas, which currently account for 25% of all meningiomas, are subject to multiple recurrences throughout the course of the disease and represent a challenge for the neurosurgeon. Radiosurgery is increasingly performed for the treatment of Grade II meningiomas and is quite efficient in controlling relapses locally at the site of the lesion, but it cannot prevent margin relapses. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the technical parameters involved in producing marginal relapses and to optimize loco-marginal control to improve therapeutic strategy.

METHODS

Eighteen patients presenting 58 lesions were treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) between 2010 and 2015 in Hopital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière. The median patient age was 68 years (25%−75% interval: 61–72 years), and the sex ratio (M/F) was 13:5. The median delay between surgery and first GKRS was 3 years. Patients were classified as having Grade II meningioma using World Health Organization (WHO) 2007 criteria. The tumor growth rate was computed by comparing 2 volumetric measurements before treatment. After GKRS, iterative MRI, performed every 6 months, detected a relapse if tumor volume increased by more than 20%. Patterns of relapse were defined as being local, marginal, or distal. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship between criterion and potential risk factors was tested by the log-rank test and univariable Cox model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 36 months (range 8–57 months). During this period, 3 patients presented with a local relapse, 5 patients with a marginal relapse, and 7 patients with a distal relapse. Crude local control was 84.5%. The local control actuarial rate was 89% at 1 year and 71% at 3 years. The marginal control actuarial rate was 81% at 1 year and 74% at 2 years. The distal control actuarial rate was 100% at 1 year, 81% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years. Median distal control was 38 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 71% at 1 year, 36% at 2 years, and 23% at 3 years. Median PFS was 18 months. Lesions treated with a minimum radiation dose of ≤ 12 Gy had significantly more local relapses than those treated with a dose > 12 Gy (p = 0.04) in univariate analysis.

Marginal control was significantly influenced by tumor growth rate, with a lower growth rate being highly associated with improved marginal control (p = 0.002). There was a trend toward a relationship between dose and marginal control, but it was not significant (p = 0.09). PFS was significantly associated with delay between first surgery and GKRS (p = 0.03). The authors noticed few complications with no sequelae.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to optimize loco-marginal control, radiosurgical treatment should require a minimum dose of > 12 Gy and an extended target volume along the dural insertion. Ideally, these parameters should correspond to the aggressiveness of the lesion, based on genetic features of the tumor.

Adjuvant Radiosurgery Versus Serial Surveillance Following Subtotal Resection of Atypical Meningioma: A Systematic Analysis

BACKGROUND

Atypical meningioma (AM) is an aggressive subtype of meningioma associated with a high recurrence rates (RR) following surgical resection. Recent studies have compared outcomes of various treatment strategies, but advantages of adjuvant radiosurgery (ARS) over serial surveillance (SS) following subtotal resection (STR) remain unclear. To further elucidate this issue, we systematically analyzed the current literature on AM and compared outcomes of ARS versus SS after STR.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were queried using relevant search terms. Retrospective case series that described patients with AM treated with ARS and SS after STR were included. Tests of proportions were performed to detect significant variations in RR, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), and 5-year overall survival (OS) between the treatment strategies (ARS vs. SS) and among individual studies.

RESULTS

A total of 619 patients (263 in the ARS group and 356 in the SS group) were identified. Mean RR, 5-year PFS, and 5-year OS were 53.5%, 50.3%, and 74.9%, respectively, for ARS versus 89.8%, 19.1%, and 89.8% for SS. RR differed between treatment strategies and ARS studies (P < 0.001), and 5-year PFS differed among treatment strategies, ARS, and SS studies (P < 0.001, P = 0.007, and P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The data presented here show significant differences in RR and 5-year PFS between ARS and SS, suggesting a potential benefit of ARS. As our understanding of the clinical outcomes of various treatment strategies for AM increases, we also move closer to integrating modalities, such as radiosurgery, into management guidelines.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT) for who grade I anterior clinoid meningiomas (ACM)

PURPOSE

While microsurgical resection plays a central role in the management of ACMs, extensive surgery may be associated with substantial morbidity particularly for tumors in intimate association with critical structures. In this study, we evaluated the use of HFSRT in the management of ACM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 22 patients with ACM were treated using HFSRT. Frameless image guided volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) was performed with a 6 MV linear accelerator (LINAC). The total dose was 25 Gy delivered in five fractions over five consecutive treatment days. Local control (LC) and progression free survival (PFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 was used in toxicity grading.

RESULTS

Out of the total 22 patients, outcomes of 19 patients with at least 36 months of periodic follow-up were assessed. Median patient age was 40 years old (range 24-77 years old). Median follow-up time was 53 months (range 36-63 months). LC and PFS rates were 100 and 89.4 % at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Only two patients (10.5 %) experienced clinical deterioration during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

LINAC-based HFSRT offers high rates of LC and PFS for patients with ACMs.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for atypical meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to evaluate outcomes in patients with atypical meningiomas (AMs) treated with surgery alone compared with surgery and radiotherapy at initial diagnosis, or at the time of first recurrence.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed AMs treated at the University of Utah from 1991 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and toxicity were assessed. Outcomes for patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy were compared with those for patients treated with surgery alone. Kaplan-Meier and the log-rank test for significance were used for LC and OS analyses.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine patients with 63 tumors were reviewed. Fifty-two patients were alive at the time of analysis with a median follow-up of 42 months. LC for all tumors was 57% with a median time to local failure (TTLF) of 48 months. The median TTLF following surgery and radiotherapy was 180 months, compared with 46 months following surgery alone (p = 0.02). Excluding Simpson Grade IV (subtotal) resections, there remained an LC benefit with the addition of radiotherapy for Simpson Grade I, II, and III resected tumors (median TTLF 180 months after surgery and radiotherapy compared with 46 months with surgery alone [p = 0.002]). Patients treated at first recurrence following any initial therapy (either surgery alone or surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy) had a median TTLF of 26 months compared with 48 months for tumors treated at first diagnosis (p = 0.007). There were 2 Grade 3 toxicities and 1 Grade 4 toxicity associated with radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant radiotherapy improves LC for AMs. The addition of adjuvant radiotherapy following even a Simpson Grade I, II, or III resection was found to confer an LC benefit. Recurrent disease is difficult to control, underscoring the importance of aggressive initial treatment.

Microsurgical management of primary jugular foramen meningiomas: a series of 22 cases and review of the literature

This study summarized clinical manifestations, surgical management, histological grading, and long-term outcome of jugular foramen meningiomas (JFMs). Retrospective study was performed in 22 consecutive patients with primary JFMs from January 2004 to October 2010, enrolling 10 men and 12 women with average age of 39.4 (14-57 years). The most common initial symptom is hearing disorder, followed by lower cranial nerve dysfunctions. The tumor was classified into type I (intracranial) in 1, type II (intracranial) in 15, type IV (intracranial-extracranial) in 6, and none type III (extracranial). Surgical approaches mainly included retrosigmoid in 7, far lateral in 10, and juxtacondylar in 5, with some variations. The gross total resection was achieved in 15 cases and subtotal resection in 7. Fourteen patients (63.6 %) developed new or worse neurological deficits immediately after operation, of whom 11 (78.6 %) got alleviation. Postoperatively, keeping airway patency and prevention from aspiration pneumonia is very important. Nasotracheal intubation is much more tolerated than orotracheal intubation for postoperative patient management. WHO grade 2 was found in four cases (18.2 %) and grade 3 in one. During the average time of follow-up in 83.2 months, only one (grade 3) died of tumor regrowth 20 months after surgery and radiosurgery. Five of 17 patients of grade 1 developed tumor regrowth. Radiosurgery provides a good tumor control for tumor regrowth in grade 1, or postoperative grade 2 tumor. In conclusion, JFMs has a favorable long-term overall survival; however, neurological preservation is still challenging, especially low cranial nerves.