Successful treatment of a patient with congenital kyphoscoliosis associated with tethered cord

Disparities in Indications and Outcomes Reporting for Spinal Column Shortening for Tethered Cord Syndrome: The Need for a Standardized Approach

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To identify commonly reported indications and outcomes in spinal column shortening (SCS) procedures.

BACKGROUND

SCS is a surgical procedure used in patients with tethered cord syndrome-characterized by abnormal attachment of neural components to surrounding tissues-to shorten the vertebral column, release tension on the spinal cord/neural elements, and alleviate associated symptoms.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE searches captured SCS literature published between 1950 and 2023. Prospective/retrospective cohort studies and case series were included without age limit or required follow-up period. Review articles without new patient presentations, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, conference abstracts, and letters were excluded. Studies included adult and pediatric patients.

RESULTS

The 29 identified studies represented 278 patients (aged 5-76 yr). In 24.1% of studies, patients underwent primary tethered cord syndrome intervention through SCS. In 41.4% of studies, patients underwent SCS after failed previous primary detethering (24.1% of studies were mixed and 10.3% were unspecified). The most commonly reported nongenitourinary/bowel surgical indications were back pain (55.2%), lower-extremity pain (48.3%), lower-extremity weakness (48.3%), lower-extremity numbness (34.5%), and lower-extremity motor dysfunction (34.5%). Genitourinary/bowel symptoms were most often described as nonspecific bladder dysfunction (58.6%), bladder incontinence (34.5%), and bowel dysfunction (31.0%). After SCS, nongenitourinary/bowel outcomes included lower-extremity pain (44.8%), back pain (31.0%), and lower-extremity sensory and motor function (both 31.0%). Bladder dysfunction (79.3%), bowel dysfunction (34.5%), and bladder incontinence (13.8%) were commonly reported genitourinary/bowel outcomes. In total, 40 presenting surgical indication categories and 33 unique outcome measures were reported across studies. Seventeen of the 278 patients (6.1%) experienced a complication.

CONCLUSION

The SCS surgical literature displays variability in operative indications and postoperative outcomes. The lack of common reporting mechanisms impedes higher-level analysis. A standardized outcomes measurement tool, encompassing both patient-reported outcome measures and objective metrics, is necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Surgical correction of pediatric spinal deformities with coexisting intraspinal pathology: A case report and literature review

Background

Surgical correction of spinal deformities with coexisting intraspinal pathology (SDCIP) requires special consideration to minimize risks of further injury to an already abnormal spinal cord. However, there is a paucity of literature on this topic. Here, the authors present a pediatric patient with a residual pilocytic astrocytoma and syringomyelia who underwent surgical correction of progressive postlaminectomy kyphoscoliosis. Techniques employed are compared to those in the literature to compile a set of guidelines for surgical correction of SDCIP.

Methods

A systematic MEDLINE search was conducted using the following keywords; "pediatric," "spinal tumor resection," "deformity correction," "postlaminectomy," "scoliosis correction," "intraspinal pathology," "tethered cord," "syringomyelia," or "diastematomyelia." Recommendations for surgical technique for pediatric SDCIP correction were reviewed.

Results

The presented case demonstrates recommendations that primarily compressive forces on the convexity of the coronal curve should be used when performing in situ correction of SDCIP. Undercorrection is favored to minimize risks of traction on the abnormal spinal cord. The literature yielded 13 articles describing various intraoperative techniques. Notably, seven articles described use of compressive forces on the convex side of the deformity as the primary mode of correction, while only five articles provided recommendations on how to safely and effectively surgically correct SDCIP.

Conclusion

The authors demonstrated with their case analysis and literature review that there are no clear current guidelines regarding the safe and effective techniques for in situ correction and fusion for the management of pediatric SDCIP.

Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Scoliosis with Intraspinal Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of preoperative halo-gravity traction and 1-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of scoliosis with intramedullary anomalies.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients with scoliosis with intramedullary anomalies were evaluated. All patients were treated with preoperative halo-gravity traction and 1-stage posterior surgery. The average age was 11.4 years (range, 7-21 years). All patients were followed-up for at least 2 years (mean, 3.5 years; range, 2-5 years). Their radiologic presentations and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

The operating time was 7.9 hours, and the intraoperative bleeding amount was 1890 mL. Both the Cobb angle of scoliosis and kyphosis were significantly improved after halo-gravity traction and the operation (P < 0.05). Tethered cords were released, and intraspinal masses (neurofibromatosis and lipoma) were excised. Syringomyelia and split spinal cord malformations were left untreated. None of the patients experienced deterioration in their neurologic status after surgery. No severe complications, such as infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, failed internal fixation, or fractured pedicle screws or rods occurred after the operation. There was no deterioration of neurologic function, delayed infection, or pseudoarthrosis during the follow-up visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative halo-gravity traction and 1-stage posterior surgery provided patients who had scoliosis and intramedullary anomalies an effective and safe treatment option with few complications.

Posterior-Only Surgical Correction with Heavy Halo-Femoral Traction for the Treatment of Severe and Rigid Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Tethered Spinal Cord and Type II Split Cord Malformation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction for the treatment of severe and rigid congenital scoliosis (SRCS) associated with tethered spinal cord (TSC) and type II split cord malformation (SCM).

METHODS

Thirteen patients with SRCS associated with TSC and type II SCM underwent posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction. The preoperative mean coronal Cobb angle was 88.87° ± 12.15°; the mean flexibility was 15.28% ± 3.88%; and the mean angle of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis was 39.63° ± 18.47° and 56.99° ± 10.02°, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean duration of surgery was 320 ± 43.64 minutes and the mean blood loss was 1422.31 ± 457.59 mL. The mean follow-up period was 24.46 ± 7.53 months. After heavy halo-femoral traction, the mean coronal Cobb angle was reduced to 59.14° ± 8.75°. After posterior-only surgical correction, postoperative mean coronal Cobb angle was further reduced to 33.85° ± 8.77°. The postoperative mean correction rate was 62.46% ± 5.04%. The postoperative mean angle of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis was 29.31° ± 6.75° and 47.79° ± 3.68°, respectively. At the final follow-up, the corrective loss rate of Cobb angle was only 0.69%. There were no significant differences between final follow-up and preoperative modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association total scores. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 total score improved at the final follow-up evaluation compared with the preoperative total score.

CONCLUSIONS

Without prophylactic neurosurgical intervention and spine-shortening osteotomy, posterior-only surgical correction with heavy halo-femoral traction could be safe and effective for the treatment of SRCS associated with TSC and type II SCM.

Management of concomitant scoliosis and tethered cord syndrome in non-spina bifida pediatric population

BACKGROUND

The management of concomitant scoliosis and tethered cord syndrome in the non-spina bifida pediatric population is challenging. In the present study, we evaluate the efficacy of different treatment modalities and propose a treatment plan for the management of affected patients.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted by querying the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for papers published between January 1996 and June 2016 and reporting on concomitant scoliosis and tethered cord. We excluded animal studies, non-English papers as well as papers reporting on patients with multiple concomitant intraspinal anomalies such as spina bifida.

RESULTS

Out of 1993 articles, only 13 met our inclusion criteria. These 13 articles described six main management approaches: Observation, cord untethering only, cord untethering followed by deformity correction, simultaneous cord untethering and deformity correction, and deformity correction without untethering. Selection of the best approach is a function of the patient's symptomatology and Cobb angle.

CONCLUSION

We propose treatment plan for the management of patients with concomitant tethered cord syndrome and spinal deformity. Asymptomatic patients can be followed conservatively and managed as scoliosis patients with no need for untethering. Surgical management in a staged fashion seems appropriate in symptomatic patients with a Cobb angle less than 35°. In these patients, deformity can improve following untethering, thus sparing the patient the risks of surgical correction of scoliosis. Staged or non-staged cord untethering and curve correction seem to be adequate in symptomatic patients with Cobb angle >35° as these patients are likely to require both untethering and deformity correction.

More preoperative flexibility implies adequate neural pliability for curve correction without prophylactic untethering in scoliosis patients with asymptomatic tethered spinal cord, a retrospective study

Background

Tethered spinal cord is frequently associated with scoliosis. It is still controversial whether a prophylactic untethering is necessary before correction procedure in scoliosis patients with tethered spinal cord. In this study we determined the clinical outcome of a one-stage posterior scoliosis correction without a prophylactic untethering for treating scoliosis with an asymptomatic tethered spinal cord.

Methods

Seventeen (5 males and 12 females) scoliosis patients with tethered spinal cords were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent a one-stage posterior scoliosis correction without preventive untethering. Parameters of radiograph were used to assess correction result. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire was analyzed pre- and post-operatively to evaluate the clinical outcomes. The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score was used to assess the pre- and post-operative spinal cord function.

Results

The post-operative coronal Cobb angle was significantly decreased compared with preoperative. (23.8 ± 6.4° vs. 58.4 ± 12.6°, P < 0.01). The coronal Cobb angle was 22.4 ± 6.8° at the final follow-up evaluation. The apical vertebral translation (AVT) was also decreased significantly. (27.5 mm vs. 60.9 mm, P < 0.01). The SRS-22 total score was improved at the 1-year follow-up evaluation compared with the pre-operative SRS-22 total score (87 ± 4 vs. 70 ± 5, p < 0.05). The functional activities, pain, self-image, mental health, and surgery satisfactory scores at the final follow-up evaluation were all improved compared with the corresponding pre-operative scores, especially the self-image and mental health scores (p < 0.05). The spinal cord function was stable and there was no new neurological symptoms after scoliosis correction. No difference existed between the pre- and post-operative total mJOA score (26 ± 2 vs. 27 ± 2, p = 0.39), which including subjective symptom (p = 0.07), clinical symptom (p = 0.33), daily activities (p = 0.44) and bladder function (p = 0.67).

Conclusion

One-stage posterior scoliosis correction is a safe and effective surgical procedure for scoliosis patients combined with asymptomatic tethered spinal cord who have adequate spinal cord function reserve.