Preoperative narcotic utilization: accuracy of patient self-reporting and its association with postoperative narcotic consumption

Regional anesthesia improves inpatient but not outpatient opioid demand in tibial shaft fracture surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing operative treatment of tibial shaft fractures have considerable pain largely managed with opioids. Regional anesthesia (RA) has been increasingly used to reduce perioperative opioid use.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 426 patients that underwent operative treatment of tibial shaft fractures with and without RA. Inpatient opioid consumption and 90-day outpatient opioid demand were measured.

RESULTS

RA significantly decreased inpatient opioid consumption for 48 h post-operatively (p = 0.008). Neither inpatient use after 48 h nor outpatient opioid demand differed in patients with RA (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

RA may help with inpatient pain control and reduce opioid use in tibial shaft fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective, therapeutic cohort study.

The Effects of Opioid Dependency Use on Postoperative Spinal Surgery Outcomes: A Review of the Available Literature

There is a lack of evidence to support the effectiveness of long-term opioid therapy in patients with chronic, noncancer pain. Despite these findings, opioids continue to be the most commonly prescribed drug to treat chronic back pain and many patients undergoing spinal surgery have trialed opioids before surgery for conservative pain management. Unfortunately, preoperative opioid use has been shown repeatedly in the literature to negatively affect spinal surgery outcomes. In this review article, we identify and summarize the main postoperative associations with preoperative opioid use that have been found in previously published studies by searching on PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and ScienceDirect; using keywords: Opioid dependency, postoperative, spinal surgery, specifically (1) increased postoperative chronic opioid use (24 studies); (2) decreased return to work (RTW) rates (8 studies); (3) increased length of hospital stay (LOS) (9 studies); and (4) increased healthcare costs (8 studies). The conclusions from these studies highlight the importance of recognizing patients on opioids preoperatively to effectively risk stratify and identify those who will benefit most from multidisciplinary counseling and guidance.

Association of inpatient opioid consumption on postoperative outcomes after open posterior spinal fusion for adult spine deformity

INTRODUCTION

Opioids are the most commonly used analgesic in the postoperative setting. However, few studies have analyzed the impact of high inpatient opioid use on outcomes following surgery, with no current studies assessing its effect on patients undergoing spinal fusion for an adult spinal deformity (ASD). Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for high inpatient opioid use, as well as to determine the impact of high opioid use on outcomes such as adverse events (AEs), hospital length of stay (LOS), cost of hospital admission, discharge disposition, and readmission rates in patients undergoing spinal fusion for ASD.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Premier healthcare database from the years 2016 and 2017. All adult patients > 40 years old who underwent thoracic or thoracolumbar fusion for ASD were identified using the ICD-10-CM diagnostic and procedural coding system. Patients were then categorized into three cohorts based on inpatient opioid use: Low MME (morphine milligram equivalents), Medium MME, and High MME. Patient demographics, comorbidities, treating hospital characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative AEs, LOS, discharge disposition, and total cost of hospital admission were assessed in the analysis. Multivariate regression analysis was done to determine independent predictors of high inpatient MME, prolonged LOS, and increased hospital cost.

RESULTS

Of 1673 patients included, 417 (24.9%) were classified as Low MME, 840 (50.2%) as Medium MME, and 416 (24.9%) as High MME. Age significantly decreased with increasing MME (Low: 71.0% 65 + years vs Medium: 62.0% 65 + years vs High: 47.4% 65 + years, p < 0.001), while the proportions of patients presenting with three or more comorbidities were similar across the cohorts (Low: 20.1% with 3 + comorbidities vs Medium: 18.0% with 3 + comorbidities vs High: 24.3% with 3 + comorbidities, p = 0.070). With respect to postoperative outcomes, the proportion of patients who experienced any AE (Low: 60.2% vs Medium: 68.8% vs High: 70.9%, p = 0.002), extended LOS (Low: 6.7% vs Medium: 20.7% vs High: 45.4%, p < 0.001), or non-routine discharge (Low: 66.6% vs Medium: 73.5% vs High: 80.1%, p = 0.003) each increased along with total MME. In addition, rates of 30-day readmission were greatest among the High MME cohort (Low: 8.4% vs Medium: 7.9% vs High: 12.5%, p = 0.022). On multivariate analysis, medium and high MME were associated with prolonged LOS [Medium: OR 4.41, CI (2.90, 6.97); High: OR 13.99, CI (8.99, 22.51), p < 0.001] and increased hospital cost [Medium: OR 1.69, CI (1.21, 2.39), p = 0.002; High: OR 1.66, CI (1.12, 2.46), p = 0.011]. Preadmission long-term opioid use [OR 1.71, CI (1.07, 2.7), p = 0.022], a prior opioid-related disorder [OR 11.32, CI (5.92, 23.49), p < 0.001], and chronic pulmonary disease [OR 1.39, CI (1.06, 1.82), p = 0.018] were each associated with a high inpatient MME on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that increasing inpatient MME consumption was associated with extended LOS and increased hospital cost in patients undergoing spinal fusion for ASD. Further studies identifying risk factors for increased MME consumption may provide better risk stratification for postoperative opioid use and healthcare resource utilization.

Postoperative opioid prescription and patient-reported outcomes after elective spine surgery: a Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative study

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess how postoperative opioid prescription dosage could affect patient-reported outcomes after elective spine surgery.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC) from January 2020 to September 2021 were included in this study. Opioid prescriptions at discharge were converted to total morphine milligram equivalents (MME). A reference value of 225 MME per week was used as a cutoff. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on prescribed total MME: ≤ 225 MME and > 225 MME. Primary outcomes included patient satisfaction, return to work status after surgery, and whether improvement of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 4-question short form for physical function (PROMIS PF) and EQ-5D was met. Generalized estimated equations were used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Regression analysis revealed that patients who had postoperative opioids prescribed with > 225 MME were less likely to be satisfied with surgery (adjusted OR [aOR] 0.81) and achieve PROMIS PF MCID (aOR 0.88). They were also more likely to be opioid dependent at 90 days after elective spine surgery (aOR 1.56).

CONCLUSIONS

The opioid epidemic is a serious threat to national public health, and spine surgeons must practice conscientious postoperative opioid prescribing to achieve adequate pain control. The authors' analysis illustrates that a postoperative opioid prescription of 225 MME or less is associated with improved patient satisfaction, greater improvement in physical function, and decreased opioid dependence compared with those who had > 225 MME prescribed.

Accuracy of self-reported opioid use in orthopaedic trauma patients

PURPOSE

Opioids have long been a mainstay of treatment for pain in patients with orthopaedic injuries, but little is known about the accuracy of self-reported narcotic usage in orthopaedic trauma. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported opioid usage in orthopaedic trauma patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all new patients presenting to the orthopaedic trauma clinic of a level 1 trauma centre with a chief complaint of recent orthopaedic-related injury over a 2-year time frame was conducted. Participants were administered a survey inquiring about narcotic usage within the prior 3 months. Responses were cross-referenced against a query of a statewide prescription drug monitoring program system.

RESULTS

The study comprised 241 participants; 206 (85.5%) were accurate reporters, while 35 (14.5%) were inaccurate reporters. Significantly increased accuracy was associated with hospital admission prior to clinic visit (β = - 1.33; χ² = 10.68, P < 0.01; OR: 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.62). Decreased accuracy was associated with higher pre-visit total morphine equivalent dose (MED) (β = 0.002; χ² = 11.30, P < 0.01), with accurate reporters having significantly lower pre-index visit MED levels compared to underreporters (89.2 ± 208.7 mg vs. 249.6 ± 509.3 mg; P = 0.04). An Emergency Department (ED) visit prior to the index visit significantly predicted underreporting (β = 0.424; χ² = 4.28, P = 0.04; OR: 2.34, 95% CI 1.01-5.38).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that most new patients presenting to an orthopaedic trauma clinic with acute injury will accurately report their narcotic usage within the preceding 3 months. Prior hospital admissions increased the likelihood of accurate reporting while higher MEDs or an ED visit prior to the initial visit increased the likelihood of underreporting.

Chronic Opioid Use Prior to ACDF Surgery Is Associated with Inferior Postoperative Outcomes: A Propensity-Matched Study of 17,443 Chronic Opioid Users

OBJECTIVE

Candidates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) have a higher rate of opioid use than does the public, but studies on preoperative opioid use have not been conducted. We aimed to understand how preoperative opioid use affects post-ACDF outcomes.

METHODS

The MarketScan Database was queried from 2007 to 2015 to identify adult patients who underwent an ACDF. Patients were classified into separate cohorts based on the number of separate opioid prescriptions in the year before their ACDF. Ninety-day postoperative complications, postoperative readmission, reoperation, and total inpatient costs were compared between opioid strata. Propensity score-matched patient cohorts were calculated to balance comorbidities across groups.

RESULTS

Of 81,671 ACDF patients, 31,312 (38.3%) were nonusers, 30,302 (37.1%) were mild users, and 20,057 (24.6%) were chronic users. Chronic opioid users had a higher comorbidity burden, on average, than patients with less frequent opioid use (P < 0.001). Chronic opioid users had higher rates of postoperative complications (9.1%) than mild opioid users (6.0%) and nonusers (5.3%) (P < 0.001) and higher rates of readmission and reoperation. After balancing opioid nonusers versus chronic opioid users along with demographic characteristics, preoperative comorbidity, and operative characteristics, postoperative complications remained elevated for chronic opioid users relative to opioid nonusers (8.6% vs. 5.7%; P < 0.001), as did rates of readmission and reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic opioid users had more comorbidities than opioid nonusers and mild opioid users, longer hospitalizations, and higher rates of postoperative complication, readmission, and reoperation. After balancing patients across covariates, the outcome differences persisted, suggesting a durable association between preoperative opioid use and negative postoperative outcomes.

Preoperative opioid usage predicts markedly inferior outcomes 2 years after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has proved to be a highly effective treatment for rotator cuff-deficient conditions and other end-stage shoulder pathologies. With value-based care emerging, identifying predictive factors of outcomes is of great interest. Although preoperative opioid use has been shown to predict inferior outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair, there is a paucity of data regarding its effect on outcomes after RTSA. We analyzed a series of RTSAs to determine the influence of preoperative opioid use on clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective review of primary RTSA patient data revealed 264 patients with ≥2 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up. Patients were classified as preoperative opioid users (71 patients) if they had taken narcotic pain medication for a minimum of 3 months prior to surgery or as opioid naive (193 patients) at the time of surgery. Assessments included preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, strength, and range of motion, as well as complications and revisions. Radiographs were analyzed for signs of loosening or mechanical failure. The Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests were used for comparisons between groups. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 69.9 years, and the mean follow-up time was 2.8 years. Opioid users were significantly younger (66.1 years vs. 70.7 years, P < .001) at the time of surgery and had significantly higher preoperative rates of mood disorders, chronic pain disorders, and disability status (all P < .05). Postoperatively, opioid users had inferior visual analog scale pain scores (2.59 vs. 1.25, P < .001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (63.2 vs. 75.2, P < .001), active forward elevation (P < .001), and internal and external rotational shoulder strength (all P < .05) compared with opioid-naive patients. Periprosthetic radiolucency (8.45% vs. 2.07%, P = .026) and subsequent revision arthroplasty (14.1% vs. 4.66%, P = .014) occurred more frequently in opioid users than in opioid-naive patients. Both groups improved from baseline preoperatively to most recent follow-up in terms of functional outcomes and pain.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative opioid use portended markedly inferior clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RTSA. Additionally, opioid users had significantly increased rates of periprosthetic radiolucency and revision. Preoperative opioid use appears to be a significant marker for adverse outcomes after RTSA.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines for Perioperative Spine: Preoperative Opioid Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Opioid use disorders in the United States have rapidly increased, yet little is known about the relationship between preoperative opioid duration and dose and patient outcomes after spine surgery. Likewise, the utility of preoperative opioid weaning is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this evidence-based clinical practice guideline is to determine if duration and dose of preoperative opioids or preoperative opioid weaning is associated with patient-reported outcomes or adverse events after elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the National Library of Medicine/PubMed database and Embase for studies relevant to opioid use among adult patients undergoing spine surgery. Clinical studies evaluating preoperative duration, dose, and opioid weaning and outcomes were selected for review.

RESULTS

A total of 41 of 845 studies met the inclusion criteria and none were Level I evidence. The use of any opioids before surgery was associated with longer postoperative opioid use, and longer duration of opioid use was associated with worse outcomes, such as higher complications, longer length of stay, higher costs, and increased utilization of resources. There is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of opioid weaning on postoperative opioid use, improving outcome, or reducing adverse events after spine surgery.

CONCLUSION

This evidence-based clinical guideline provides Grade B recommendations that preoperative opioid use and longer duration of preoperative opioid use are associated with chronic postoperative opioid use and worse outcome after spine surgery. Insufficient evidence supports the efficacy of an opioid wean before spine surgery (Grade I).The full guidelines can be accessed at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/1-preoperative-opioid-evaluation.

Evaluating the Impact of Psychiatric Disorders on Preoperative Pain Ratings, Narcotics Use, and the PROMIS-29 Quality Domains in Spine Surgery Candidates

Objective We aimed to study the relationship between psychiatric Disorders (PD), preoperative pain, and opioid medication intake, as well as the quality of life patient-reported outcome measures using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29 (PROMIS-29) questionnaire, during the 30-day interval preceding surgery, in a consecutive series of patients who were scheduled to undergo surgical spine procedures. We hypothesized that PD could affect preoperative narcotic use and pain interference in a fashion that was not linearly associated with preoperative pain in spine surgery candidates. Methods The records of consecutive adult patients who underwent elective spinal surgery between October 2016 and August 2017 at a single institution were reviewed. We included patients who underwent preoperative pain assessment within 30 days prior to their planned surgery using the PROMIS-29 questionnaire. Patients with PD were compared to controls. Results A total of 117 patients matched our criteria. The average rating of pain intensity was notably higher in the PD group as compared to controls (p=0.004). The PD group had more patients complaining of high pain levels (>6) as compared to the control group (p=0.026). Controls with high pain levels had a greater incidence of preoperative narcotic use as compared to the low-pain cohort (p=0.029). However, there was no difference in the actual dose of daily narcotic medication taken between the PD and control groups (P=0.099) or between the low- and high pain score groups in the control (p=0.291) and PD (p=0.441) groups, respectively. Patients with PD and higher pain ratings seemed to have a higher incidence of anxiety (p=0.005) and depression (p<0.001). That was not the case for controls. Conclusions PDs may impact the degree of preoperative pain interference and the intake of narcotic medication independently from pain intensity ratings.

Association Between Opioid Use and Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Randomized Trial Evaluating Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for the Relief of Chronic Low Back Pain

BACKGROUND

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a primary indication for opioid therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the hypothesis that CLBP patients reporting reduced opioid use have superior functional outcomes following basivertebral nerve (BVN) radiofrequency ablation.

METHODS

This post hoc analysis from a sham-controlled trial examined short-acting opioid use from baseline through 1 yr. Opioid use was stratified into 3 groups by two blinded external reviewers. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) measurements between those patients who increased or decreased their opioid usage compared to baseline.

RESULTS

Actively treated patients with decreased opioid use at 12 mo had a mean ODI improvement of 24.9 ± 16.0 (n = 27) compared to 7.3 ± 9.8 (n = 18) for patients reporting increased opioid use (P < .001). In the sham arm, the improvements in ODI were 17.4 ± 16.1 (n = 19) and 1.2 ± 14.3 (n = 5; P = .053) for the patients reporting decreased vs increased opioid usage, respectively. Actively treated patients reporting decreased opioid use had a mean improvement in VAS of 3.3 ± 2.5 (n = 27) compared to 0.6 ± 1.8 (n = 18) for patients reporting increased opioid use (P < .001). In the sham arm, the improvements in VAS were 2.5 ± 2.6 (n = 19) and 1.4 ± 1.9 (n = 5; P = .374) for patients reporting decreased vs increased opioid use, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Subjects undergoing BVN ablation who decreased opioid use had greater improvement in ODI and VAS scores compared with those reporting increased opioid usage. There is an association between functional benefit from BVN ablation and reduced opioid use.

Opioid use after adult spinal deformity surgery: patterns of cessation and associations with preoperative use

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of the study were to determine, among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD), the following: 1) how preoperative opioid use, dose, and duration of use are associated with long-term opioid use and dose; 2) how preoperative opioid use is associated with rates of postoperative use from 6 weeks to 2 years; and 3) how postoperative opioid use at 6 months and 1 year is associated with use at 2 years.

METHODS

Using a single-center, longitudinally maintained registry, the authors identified 87 patients who underwent ASD surgery from 2013 to 2017. Fifty-nine patients reported preoperative opioid use (37 high-dose [≥ 90 morphine milligram equivalents daily] and 22 low-dose use). The duration of preoperative use was long-term (≥ 6 months) for 44 patients and short-term for 15. The authors evaluated postoperative opioid use at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine associations of preoperative opioid use, dose, and duration with use at each time point (alpha = 0.05).

RESULTS

The following preoperative factors were associated with opioid use 2 years postoperatively: any opioid use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 14, 95% CI 2.5-82), high-dose use (aOR 7.3, 95% CI 1.1-48), and long-term use (aOR 17, 95% CI 2.2-123). All patients who reported high-dose opioid use at the 2-year follow-up examination had also reported preoperative opioid use. Preoperative high-dose use (aOR 247, 95% CI 5.8-10,546) but not long-term use (aOR 4.0, 95% CI 0.18-91) was associated with high-dose use at the 2-year follow-up visit. Compared with patients who reported no preoperative use, those who reported preoperative opioid use had higher rates of use at each postoperative time point (from 94% vs 62% at 6 weeks to 54% vs 7.1% at 2 years) (all p < 0.001). Opioid use at 2 years was independently associated with use at 1 year (aOR 33, 95% CI 6.8-261) but not at 6 months (aOR 4.3, 95% CI 0.95-24).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' preoperative opioid use, dose, and duration of use are associated with long-term use after ASD surgery, and a high preoperative dose is also associated with high-dose opioid use at the 2-year follow-up visit. Patients using opioids 1 year after ASD surgery may be at risk for long-term use.

Accuracy of Patient-Reported Preoperative Opioid Use and Impact on Continued Opioid Use After Outpatient Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic has created a national healthcare crisis, and little is known about the accuracy of self-reported narcotic usage in arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported opioid usage in patients undergoing outpatient arthroplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on all primary unilateral arthroplasty procedures performed in 2018 at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center, yielding a cohort of 959 arthroplasties. Patient's prescription records were queried in the Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System for 3 months before surgery and minimum 9 months after surgery. These data were cross-referenced against the patient-reported preoperative use of narcotics. Three groups were evaluated: (G1) no preoperative narcotics, (G2) accurately self-reported on narcotics, and (G3) on narcotics but did not disclose.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen patients (12%) were on preoperative opioids based on the Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System query, with only 35 of these patients (31%) self-reporting. G2 had significantly lower postoperative knee range of motion, Knee Society Pain score, Knee Society Clinical score, Knee Society Functional score, Harris Hip Score, and University of California Los Angeles activity scores than G1. Overnight stays occurred in 1.2% of patients in G1, 3% of patients in G2 (P = .5), and 6.3% of patient in G3 (P = .002). All aspects of postoperative narcotic use were significantly higher in G2 and G3 compared to G1. The relative risk for narcotic refill after 90 days in G2 was 4.6 (95% confidence interval 3.7-5.8, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients on preoperative narcotics did not disclose their use. Patients on narcotics preoperatively had significantly greater postoperative narcotic use including refills, total morphine milliequivalent, and risk of being on narcotics 90 days after surgery.

Preoperative Opioid Use and Clinical Outcomes in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioid use and opioid-related deaths have become an epidemic in the United States, leading to devastating economic and health ramifications. Opioids are the most commonly prescribed drug class to treat low back pain, despite the limited body of evidence supporting their efficacy. Furthermore, preoperative opioid use prior to spine surgery has been reported to range from 20% to over 70%, with nearly 20% of this population being opioid dependent.

OBJECTIVE

To review the medical literature on the effect of preoperative opioid use in outcomes in spine surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed manuscripts published prior to February 1, 2019, exploring the effect of preoperative opioid use on outcomes in spine surgery. We identified 45 articles that analyzed independently the effect of preoperative opioid use on outcomes (n = 32 lumbar surgery, n = 19 cervical surgery, n = 7 spinal deformity, n = 5 “other”).

RESULTS

Preoperative opioid use is overwhelmingly associated with negative surgical and functional outcomes, including postoperative opioid use, hospitalization duration, healthcare costs, risk of surgical revision, and several other negative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There is an urgent and unmet need to find and apply extensive perioperative solutions to combat opioid use, particularly in patients undergoing spine surgery. Further investigations are necessary to determine the optimal method to treat such patients and to develop opioid-combative strategies in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Predictors of long-term opioid dependence in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a focus on pre-operative opioid usage

PURPOSE

Predictors of long-term opioid usage in TLIF patients have not been previously explored in the literature. We examined the effect of pre-operative narcotic use in addition to other predictors of the pattern and duration of post-operative narcotic usage.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single academic institution of patients undergoing a one- or two-level primary TLIF between 2014 and 2017. Total oral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) for inpatient use were calculated and used as the common unit of comparison.

RESULTS

A multivariate binary logistic regression (R² = 0.547, specificity 95%, sensitivity 58%) demonstrated that a psychiatric or chronic pain diagnosis (OR 3.95, p = 0.013, 95% CI 1.34-11.6), pre-operative opioid use (OR 8.65, p < 0.001, 95% CI 2.59-29.0), ASA class (OR 2.95, p = 0.025, 95% CI 1.14-7.63), and inpatient total MME (1.002, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.001-1.003) were positive predictors of prolonged opioid use at 6-month follow-up, while inpatient muscle relaxant use (OR 0.327, p = 0.049, 95% CI 0.108-0.994) decreased the probability of prolonged opioid use. Patients in the pre-operative opioid use group had a significantly higher rate of opioid usage at 6 weeks (79% vs. 46%, p < 0.001), 3 months (51% vs. 14%, p < 0.001), and 6 months (40% vs. 5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-operative opioid usage is associated with higher total inpatient opioid use and a significantly higher risk of long-term opiate usage at 6 months. Approximately 40% of pre-operative narcotic users will continue to consume narcotics at 6-month follow-up, compared with 5% of narcotic-naïve patients. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Characterizing the Risk of Long-Term Opioid Utilization in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Single-institution retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether prescribing practices at discharge are associated with opioid dependence (OD) in patients undergoing discectomy or laminectomy procedures for degenerative indications.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Long-term opioid use in spine surgery is associated with higher healthcare utilization and worse postoperative outcomes. The impact of prescribing practices at discharge within this surgical population is poorly understood.

METHODS

A query of an administrative database was conducted to identify all patients undergoing discectomy or laminectomy procedures at our high-volume tertiary referral center between 2007 and 2016. For patients included in the analysis, opioid prescription data on admission and discharge were manually abstracted from the electronic health record, including opioid type, frequency, route, and dose, and then converted to daily morphine equivalent dose (MED) values. We defined OD as a consecutive narcotic prescription lasting for at least 90 days within the first 12 months after the index surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 819 total patients, 499 (60.9%) patients had an active opioid prescription before surgery. Postoperatively, 813 (99.3%) received at least one narcotic prescription within 30 days of index surgery, and 162 (19.8%) continued with sustained opioid use in the 12 months after surgery. In adjusted analysis, patients with OD had a higher incidence of preoperative depression (P = 0.012) and preoperative opioid use (P < 0.001), as well as a higher frequency of preoperative benzodiazepine prescriptions (P = 0.009), and discharge MED value exceeding 120 mg/day (P = 0.013). Postoperative OD was observed in 7.5% of previously opioid-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to test for an association between MED values prescribed at discharge and sustained opioid use after lumbar spine surgery. In addition to previously reported risk factors, discharge prescription dose exceeding 120 mg/day is independently associated with OD after spine surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

The Association of Preoperative Opioid Usage With Patient-Reported Outcomes, Adverse Events, and Return to Work After Lumbar Fusion: Analysis From the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC)

BACKGROUND

It is important to delineate the relationship between opioid use and spine surgery outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association between preoperative opioid usage and postoperative adverse events, patient satisfaction, return to work, and improvement in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures by using 2-yr data from a prospective spine registry.

METHODS

Preoperative opioid chronicity from 8693 lumbar fusion patients was defined as opioid-naïve (no usage), new users (&lt;6 wk), short-term users (6 wk-3 mo), intermediate-term users (3-6 mo), and chronic users (&gt;6 mo). Multivariate generalized estimating equation models were constructed.

RESULTS

All comparisons were to opioid-naïve patients. Chronic opioid users showed less satisfaction with their procedure at 90 d (Relative Risk (RR) 0.95, P = .001), 1 yr (RR 0.89, P = .001), and 2 yr (RR 0.89, P = .005). New opioid users were more likely to show improvement in ODI at 90 d (RR 1.25, P &lt; .001), 1 yr (RR 1.17, P &lt; .001), and 2 yr (RR 1.19, P = .002). Short-term opioid users were more likely to show ODI improvement at 90 d (RR 1.25, P &lt; .001). Chronic opioid users were less likely to show ODI improvement at 90 d (RR 0.90, P = .004), 1 yr (RR 0.85, P &lt; .001), and 2 yr (RR 0.80, P = .003). Chronic opioid users were less likely to return to work at 90 d (RR 0.80, P &lt; .001).

CONCLUSION

In lumbar fusion patients and when compared to opioid-naïve patients, new opioid users were more likely and chronic opioid users less likely to have improved ODI scores 2 yr after surgery. Chronic opioid users are less likely to be satisfied with their procedure 2 yr after surgery and less likely to return to work at 90 d. Preoperative opioid counseling is advised.

Intraosseous Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Multicenter Study

Background

The purpose of the present study is to report the 2-year clinical outcomes for chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients treated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the basivertebral nerve (BVN) in a randomized controlled trial that previously reported 1-year follow up.

Methods

A total of 147 patients were treated with RF ablation of the BVN in a randomized controlled trial designed to demonstrate safety and efficacy as part of a Food and Drug Administration-Investigational Device Exemption trial. Evaluations, including patient self-assessments, physical and neurological examinations, and safety assessments, were performed at 2 and 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Participants randomized to the sham control arm were allowed to cross to RF ablation at 12 months. Due to a high rate of crossover, RF ablation treated participants acted as their own control in a comparison to baseline for the 24-month outcomes.

Results

Clinical improvements in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Medical Outcomes Trust Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Summary were statistically significant compared to baseline at all follow-up time points through 2 years. The mean percent improvements in ODI and VAS compared to baseline at 2 years were 53.7 and 52.9%, respectively. Responder rates for ODI and VAS were also maintained through 2 years with patients showing clinically meaningful improvements in both: ODI ≥ 10-point improvement in 76.4% of patients and ODI ≥ 20-point improvement in 57.5%; VAS ≥ 1.5 cm improvement in 70.2% of patients.

Conclusions

Patients treated with RF ablation of the BVN for CLBP exhibited sustained clinical benefits in ODI and VAS and maintained high responder rates at 2 years following treatment. Basivertebral nerve ablation appears to be a durable, minimally invasive treatment for the relief of CLBP.

Association Between Preoperative Narcotic Use with Perioperative Complication Rates, Patient Reported Pain Scores, and Ambulatory Status After Complex Spinal Fusion (≥5 Levels) for Adult Deformity Correction

OBJECTIVE

The widespread over-use of narcotics has been increasing. However, whether narcotic use impacts surgical outcomes after complex spinal fusion remains understudied. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is an association between preoperative narcotic use with perioperative complication rates, patient-reported pain scores, and ambulatory status after complex spinal fusions.

METHODS

The medical records of 134 adult (age ≥18 years) patients with spinal deformity undergoing elective, primary complex spinal fusion (≥5 levels) for deformity correction in a major academic institution from 2005-2015 were reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, pain scores, and ambulatory status were collected for each patient.

RESULTS

Patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between both cohorts, except that the Narcotic-User cohort had a greater mean age (57.5 years vs. 50.7 years; P = 0.045) and prevalence of depression (39.4% vs. 16.2%; P = 0.003). Complication rates were similar between both cohorts. The Narcotic-User cohort had significantly higher pain scores at baseline (6.7 ± 2.4 vs. 4.0 ± 3.4; P < 0.001) and at the first postoperative pain score reported (6.7 ± 2.8 vs. 5.3 ± 2.9; P = 0.013), but had a significantly greater improvement from baseline to last pain score (Narcotic-User: -2.5 ± 3.9 vs. Non-User: -0.5 ± 4.7; P = 0.031). The Narcotic-User cohort had significantly greater ambulation on the first postoperative ambulatory day compared with the Non-User cohort (103.8 ± 144.4 vs. 56.4 ± 84.0; P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the preoperative use of narcotics may impact patient perception of pain and improvement after complex spinal fusions (≥5 levels). Consideration of patients' narcotic status preoperatively may facilitate tailored pain management and physical therapy regimens.

Preoperative Narcotic Use and Inferior Outcomes After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Our purpose was to determine whether the chronic use of preoperative narcotics adversely affected clinical and/or radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients (79 shoulders) with primary total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were evaluated clinically and radiographically at preoperative visits and postoperatively at a minimum follow-up of 2 years: 26 patients (28 shoulders) taking chronic narcotic pain medication for at least 3 months before surgery and 47 patients (51 shoulders) who were not taking narcotics preoperatively.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, significant differences were noted between the narcotic and nonnarcotic groups regarding American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores and visual analog scale scores, as well as forward elevation, external rotation, and all strength measurements (P < 0.01). The nonnarcotic group had markedly higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, better overall range of motion and strength, and markedly lower visual analog scale scores than the narcotic group.

CONCLUSION

Chronic preoperative narcotic use seems to be a notable indicator of poor outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Patients With Hip or Knee Arthritis Underreport Narcotic Usage

BACKGROUND

Patients taking narcotics chronically are more likely to have worse outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. These negative outcomes may be avoided when modifiable risk factors such as narcotic use are identified and improved before elective joint replacement. An accurate assessment of narcotic use is needed to identify patients before surgery. This study examines the amount of reported narcotic use in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis and compares this with the narcotic prescriptions recorded in our state's drug prescription monitoring database.

METHODS

All new patients seen during a 1-year period by our adult reconstruction practice were identified. Patients' electronic health records were reviewed to determine whether narcotic use was reported. A subsequent search was performed using the Arkansas Prescription Drug Monitoring Program to determine if the patient had been previously prescribed a narcotic.

RESULTS

A total of 502 patients were included in the study. One hundred seventy patients (34%) were prescribed a narcotic within 3 months of the clinic visit according to the Arkansas Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, but only 111 (22%) reported narcotic use in their electronic health record (P < .0001). Moreover, only 92 patients (54% of 170) prescribed a narcotic within 3 months reported it. Narcotic recipients were more likely to be under the age of 65 years (P = .0081), smokers (P < .0001), and current benzodiazepine users (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients significantly underreport their narcotic use to their physician. The availability of a state prescription drug monitoring program allows physicians to check the frequency of filled narcotic prescriptions by their patients.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Mixture Has Similar Pain Relief and Significantly Fewer Complications at Less Cost Compared to Indwelling Interscalene Catheter in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and costs of indwelling interscalene catheter (ISC) and liposomal bupivacaine (LBC), with and without adjunctive medications, in patients with primary shoulder arthroplasty are a source of current debate.

METHODS

In 214 arthroplasties, 156 patients had ISC and 58 had LBC injections that were mixed with morphine, ketorolac, and 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine. Charts were reviewed for visual analog scale pain scores, oral morphine equivalent (OME) usage, major complications, and costs.

RESULTS

Visual analog scale scores were not significantly different at 24 hours or at 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Average OME consumption at 24 hours was significantly more with LBC, but was not significantly different at 12 weeks. Relative risk of a major complication was nearly 4 times higher with ISC than with LBC. The average cost for the LBC mixture was $289.04, and for ISC, including equipment and anesthesia fees, was $1559.42.

CONCLUSION

The intraoperative LBC mixture provided equivalent pain relief with significantly fewer major complications and at markedly lower cost than ISC. LBC required almost twice as much OME to attain the same level of pain relief at 24 hours, but there was no significant difference in the cumulative amount of outpatient narcotic use.