1
|
Burgess L, Nguyen E, Tseng CL, Guckenberger M, Lo SS, Zhang B, Nielsen M, Maralani P, Nguyen QN, Sahgal A. Practice and principles of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100716. [PMID: 38226025 PMCID: PMC10788412 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is the dominant treatment modality for painful spine and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM). Historically, this was achieved with conventional low dose external beam radiotherapy, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for these indications. Meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated improved pain response and more durable tumor control with SBRT for spine metastases. However, in the setting of NSBM, there is limited evidence supporting global adoption and large scale randomized clinical trials are in need. SBRT is technically demanding requiring careful consideration of organ at risk tolerance, and strict adherence to technical requirements including immobilization, simulation, contouring and image-guidance procedures. Additional considerations include follow up practices after SBRT, with appropriate imaging playing a critical role in response assessment. Finally, there is renewed research into promising new technologies that may further refine the use of SBRT in both spinal and NSBM in the years to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Burgess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Beibei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Nielsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel PP, Cao Y, Chen X, LeCompte MC, Kleinberg L, Khan M, McNutt T, Bydon A, Kebaish K, Theodore N, Larry Lo SF, Lee SH, Lubelski D, Redmond KJ. Oncologic and Functional Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for High-Grade Malignant Spinal Cord Compression. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101327. [PMID: 38260225 PMCID: PMC10801652 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although surgical decompression is the gold standard for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) from solid tumors, not all patients are candidates or undergo successful surgical Bilsky downgrading. We report oncologic and functional outcomes for patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to high-grade MESCC. Methods and Materials Patients with Bilsky grade 2 to 3 MESCC from solid tumor metastases treated with SBRT at a single institution from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received upfront surgery before SBRT were included only if postsurgical Bilsky grade remained ≥2. Neurologic examinations, magnetic resonance imaging, pain assessments, and analgesic usage were assessed every 3 to 4 months post-SBRT. Cumulative incidence of local recurrence was calculated with death as a competing risk, and overall survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Results One hundred forty-three patients were included. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 5.1%, 7.5%, and 14.1% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. At first post-SBRT imaging, 16.2% of patients with initial Bilsky grade 2 improved to grade 1, and 53.8% of patients were stable. Five of 13 patients (38.4%) with initial Bilsky grade 3 improved to grade 1 to 2. Pain response at 3 and 6 months post-SBRT was complete in 45.4% and 55.7%, partial in 26.9% and 13.1%, stable in 24.1% and 27.9%, and worse in 3.7% and 3.3% of patients, respectively. At 3 and 6 months after SBRT, 17.8% and 25.0% of patients had improved ambulatory status and 79.7% and 72.4% had stable status. Conclusions We report the largest series to date of patients with high-grade MESCC treated with SBRT. The excellent local control and functional outcomes suggest SBRT is a reasonable approach in inoperable patients or cases unable to be successfully surgically downgraded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palak P. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yilin Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xuguang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael C. LeCompte
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lawrence Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Majid Khan
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Todd McNutt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Khaled Kebaish
- Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Sheng-fu Larry Lo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hoftstra, Manhasset, New York
| | - Sang H. Lee
- Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Kristin J. Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tanaka O, Taniguchi T, Nakaya S, Adachi K, Kiryu T, Makita C, Matsuo M. Stereotactic body radiation therapy to the spine: contouring the cauda equina instead of the spinal cord is more practical as the organ at risk. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:407-415. [PMID: 37795406 PMCID: PMC10547411 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is recognized as a curative treatment for oligometastasis. The spinal cord becomes the cauda equina at the lumbar level, and the nerves are located dorsally. Recently, a consensus has been reached that the cauda equina should be contoured as an organ at risk (OAR). Here, we examined the separate contouring benefits for the spinal canal versus the cauda equina only as the OAR. Materials and methods A medical physicist designed a simulation plan for 10 patients with isolated lumbar metastasis. The OAR was set with three contours: the whole spinal canal, cauda equina only, and cauda equina with bilateral nerve roots. The prescribed dose for the planning target volume (PTV) was 30 Gy/3 fx. Results For the constrained QAR doses, D90 and D95 were statistically significant due to the different OAR contouring. The maximum dose (Dmax) was increased to the spinal canal when the cauda equina max was set to ≤ 20 Gy, but dose hotspots were observed in most cases in the medullary area. The Dmax and PTV coverage were negatively correlated for the cauda equina and the spinal canal if Dmax was set to ≤ 20 Gy for both. Conclusions A portion of the spinal fluid is also included when the spinal canal is set as the OAR. Thus, the PTV coverage rate will be poor if the tumor is in contact with the spinal canal. However, the PTV coverage rate increases if only the cauda equina is set as the OAR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osamu Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asahi University Hospital, Gifu City, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuya Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asahi University Hospital, Gifu City, Gifu, Japan
| | - Shuto Nakaya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asahi University Hospital, Gifu City, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kousei Adachi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asahi University Hospital, Gifu City, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takuji Kiryu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asahi University Hospital, Gifu City, Gifu, Japan
| | - Chiyoko Makita
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu City, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masayuki Matsuo
- Department of Radiology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu City, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nguyen EK, Ruschin M, Zhang B, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Detsky J, Chen H, Sahgal A, Tseng CL. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases: a review of 24 Gy in 2 daily fractions. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:15-27. [PMID: 37155133 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04327-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has proven to be a highly effective treatment for selected patients with spinal metastases. Randomized evidence shows improvements in complete pain response rates and local control with lower retreatment rates favoring SBRT, compared to conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT). While there are several reported dose-fractionation schemes for spine SBRT, 24 Gy in 2 fractions has emerged with Level 1 evidence providing an excellent balance between minimizing treatment toxicity while respecting patient convenience and financial strain. METHODS We provide an overview of the 24 Gy in 2 SBRT fraction regimen for spine metastases, which was developed at the University of Toronto and tested in an international Phase 2/3 randomized controlled trial. RESULTS The literature summarizing global experience with 24 Gy in 2 SBRT fractions suggests 1-year local control rates ranging from 83-93.9%, and 1-year rates of vertebral compression fracture ranging from 5.4-22%. Reirradiation of spine metastases that failed prior cEBRT is also feasible with 24 Gy in 2 fractions, and 1-year local control rates range from 72-86%. Post-operative spine SBRT data are limited but do support the use of 24 Gy in 2 fractions with reported 1-year local control rates ranging from 70-84%. Typically, the rates of plexopathy, radiculopathy and myositis are under 5% in those series reporting mature follow up, with no cases of radiation myelopathy (RM) reported in the de novo setting when the spinal cord avoidance structure is limited to 17 Gy in 2 fractions. However, re-irradiation RM has been observed following 2 fraction SBRT. More recently, 2-fraction dose escalation with 28 Gy, with a higher dose constraint to the critical neural tissues, has been reported suggesting improved rates of local control. This regimen may be important in those patients with radioresistant histologies, high grade epidural disease, and/or paraspinal disease. CONCLUSION The dose-fractionation of 24 Gy in 2 fractions is well-supported by published literature and is an ideal starting point for centers looking to establish a spine SBRT program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric K Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Beibei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vilotte F, Pasquier D, Blanchard P, Supiot S, Khalifa J, Schick U, Lacornerie T, Vieillevigne L, Marre D, Chapet O, Latorzeff I, Magne N, Meyer E, Cao K, Belkacemi Y, Bibault J, Berge-Lefranc M, Faivre J, Gnep K, Guimas V, Hasbini A, Langrand-Escure J, Hennequin C, Graff P. Recommendations for stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. A GETUG (French society of urological radiation oncolgists) consensus using a national two-round modified Delphi survey. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 37:33-40. [PMID: 36052019 PMCID: PMC9424259 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The relevance of metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) remains to be demonstrated through phase III trials. Multiple SBRT procedures have been published potentially resulting in a disparity of practices. Therefore, the french society of urological radiation oncolgists (GETUG) recognized the need for joint expert consensus guidelines for metastasis-directed SBRT in order to standardize practice in trials carried out by the group. Materials and methods After a comprehensive literature review, 97 recommendation statements were created regarding planning and delivery of spine bone (SBM) and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM) SBRT. These statements were then submitted to a national online two-round modified Delphi survey among main GETUG investigators. Consensus was achieved if a statement received ≥ 75 % agreements, a trend to consensus being defined as 65-74 % agreements. Any statement without consensus at round one was re-submitted in round two. Results Twenty-one out of 29 (72.4%) surveyed experts responded to both rounds. Seventy-five statements achieved consensus at round one leaving 22 statements needing a revote of which 16 achieved consensus and 5 a trend to consensus. The final rate of consensus was 91/97 (93.8%). Statements with no consensus concerned patient selection (3/19), dose and fractionation (1/11), prescription and dose objectives (1/9) and organs at risk delineation (1/15). The voting resulted in the writing of step-by-step consensus guidelines. Conclusion Consensus guidelines for SBM and NSBM SBRT were agreed upon using a validated modified Delphi approach. These guidelines will be used as per-protocole recommendations in ongoing and further GETUG clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Vilotte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - D. Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - P. Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - S. Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Boulevard Professeur Jacques Monod, 44800 Saint Herblain, France
| | - J. Khalifa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1 AV Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - U. Schick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU de Brest, Hôpital Morvan, avenue Foch, 29200 Brest, France
| | - T. Lacornerie
- Division of Radiation Medical Physics, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000 Lille, France
| | - L. Vieillevigne
- Division of Radiation Medical Physics, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1 AV Irène Joliot Curie, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - D. Marre
- Division of Radiation Medical Physics, Groupe ONCORAD Garonne, Clinique Pasteur, Bât Atrium, 1 rue de la petite vitesse, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - O. Chapet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CH Lyon Sud 165 Chemin Du Grand Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-bénite, France
| | - I. Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Groupe ONCORAD Garonne, Clinique Pasteur, Bât Atrium, 1 rue de la petite vitesse, 31300 Toulouse, France
| | - N. Magne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis AV Albert Raimond, 42270 Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | - E. Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Av. du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - K. Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Paris, 26 rue d’Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Y. Belkacemi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, 1 rue Gustave Eiffel, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - J.E. Bibault
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - M. Berge-Lefranc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Saint Michel, rue du Docteur Schweitzer, 17000 La Rochelle, France
| | - J.C. Faivre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 Av. de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - K. Gnep
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, AV de la Bataille Flandres Dunkerque, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - V. Guimas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Boulevard Professeur Jacques Monod, 44800 Saint Herblain, France
| | - A. Hasbini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinique Pasteur, 32 r Auguste Kervern, 29200 Brest, France
| | - J. Langrand-Escure
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, 108 bis AV Albert Raimond, 42270 Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| | - C. Hennequin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Saint Louis, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - P. Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie Saint Cloud, 35 rue Dailly, 92210 Saint Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Radiation myelopathy following stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine metastases. J Neurooncol 2022; 159:23-31. [PMID: 35737172 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04037-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now considered a standard of care treatment option in the management of spine metastases. One of the most feared complications of spine SBRT is radiation myelopathy (RM). METHODS We provided a narrative review of RM following spine SBRT based on review of the published literature, including data on spinal cord dose constraints associated with the risk of RM, strategies to mitigate the risk, and management options for RM. RESULTS There are limited published data of cases of RM following spine SBRT with detailed spinal cord dosimetry. The HyTEC report provided recommendations for the point maximal dose (Dmax) for the spinal cord that is associated with a < 5% risk of RM for 1-5 fractions spine SBRT. In the setting of spine SBRT reirradiation after previous conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT), factors associated with RM are: SBRT spinal cord Dmax, cumulative spinal cord Dmax, and the time interval between previous RT and SBRT reirradiation. There are various strategies to mitigate the risk of RM, including accurate delineation of the spinal cord (or thecal sac), strict adherence to the recommended spinal cord dose constraints, and robust treatment immobilisation set-up and delivery. Limited effective treatment options are available for patients who develop RM, and these include corticosteroids, hyperbaric oxygen, and bevacizumab; however, none have been supported by high quality evidence. CONCLUSION RM is a rare but devastating complication following SBRT for spine metastases. There are strategies to minimise the risk of RM to ensure safe delivery of spine SBRT.
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu L, Huang W, Cai W, Sun Z, Fang M, Ji Y, Wang S, Zhang J, Hu T, Cheng M, Yan W. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Separation Surgery and Piecemeal Spondylectomy for Spinal Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis. Front Surg 2021; 8:686930. [PMID: 34881284 PMCID: PMC8645642 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.686930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the outcomes between piecemeal spondylectomy and separation surgery for patients with spinal metastasis. Summary of Background Data: Piecemeal spondylectomy and separation surgery are two widely-used treatment options for spinal metastasis. However, no studies have compared the surgical outcomes between both treatment modalities. Methods: Patients with spinal metastasis who underwent piecemeal spondylectomy or separation surgery between August 2017 and April 2020 at our spine center were recruited. Demographic, preoperative, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to analyze overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with spinal metastasis. Results: Overall, 26 patients were treated with piecemeal spondylectomy, and 29 underwent separation surgery with postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in neurological status. The piecemeal spondylectomy group had significantly more blood loss (1784.62 ± 833.64 vs. 1165.52 ± 307.38 ml) and required longer operative time (4.76 ± 0.93 vs. 3.73 ± 1.15 h) than the separation surgery group. No significant difference in OS was found between the groups (P = 0.064); however, patients in the separation surgery group experienced less local recurrence than those in the piecemeal spondylectomy group (P = 0.0014). Notably, significant differences were detected in the development of complications between the groups (P = 0.029). Conclusion: Separation surgery led to less blood loss and reduced complications and had shorter operation time than piecemeal spondylectomy. Although no significant differences were found in OS between the groups, separation surgery was associated with better PFS compared with piecemeal spondylectomy. These findings suggest that separation surgery has some advantages over piecemeal spondylectomy for patients with spinal metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lun Xu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wending Huang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiluo Cai
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - ZhengWang Sun
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Meng Fang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingzheng Ji
- Department of Orthopedic, Naval Medical Center of PLA, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuoer Wang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianing Zhang
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tu Hu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Mo Cheng
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wangjun Yan
- Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Faruqi S, Chen H, Fariselli L, Levivier M, Ma L, Paddick I, Pollock BE, Regis J, Sheehan J, Suh J, Yomo S, Sahgal A. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Postoperative Spine Malignancy: A Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) Practice Guidelines. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:e65-e78. [PMID: 34673275 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine safety and efficacy of postoperative spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the published literature, and to present practice recommendations on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed, specific to postoperative spine SBRT, using PubMed and Embase databases. A meta-analysis for 1-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF) probability was conducted. RESULTS The literature search revealed 251 potentially relevant articles after duplicates were removed. Of these 56 were reviewed in-depth for eligibility and 12 met all the inclusion criteria for analysis. 7 studies were retrospective, 2 prospective observational and 3 were prospective phase I/II clinical trials. Outcomes for a total of 461 patients and 499 spinal segments were reported. 10 studies used an MRI fused to CT-simulation for treatment planning, 2 investigations reported on all patients receiving a CT-myelogram at the time of planning. Meta-analysis for 1 year LC and OS was 88.9% and 57%, respectively. The crude reported VCF rate was 5.6%. One case of myelopathy was described in a patient with a previously irradiated spinal segment. One patient developed an esophageal fistula requiring surgical repair. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative spine SBRT delivers a high 1-year LC with acceptably low toxicity. Patients that may benefit from this include those with oligometastatic disease, radioresistant histology, paraspinal masses and/or those with a history of prior irradiation to the affected spinal segment. The ISRS recommends a minimum interval of 8 to 14 days after invasive surgery prior to simulation for SBRT, with initiation of radiotherapy within 4 weeks of surgery. An MRI fused to the planning CT, and/or the use of a CT-myelogram, are necessary for target and organ-at-risk delineation. A planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV) of 1.5 to 2mm for the spinal cord is advised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salman Faruqi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura Fariselli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milano, Unità di Radioterapia, Milan, Italy
| | - Marc Levivier
- Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lijun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ian Paddick
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bruce E Pollock
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jean Regis
- Department of Functional Neurosurgery, Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - John Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Shoji Yomo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sahgal A, Chang JH, Ma L, Marks LB, Milano MT, Medin P, Niemierko A, Soltys SG, Tomé WA, Wong CS, Yorke E, Grimm J, Jackson A. Spinal Cord Dose Tolerance to Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:124-136. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
10
|
Zeng KL, Sahgal A, Husain ZA, Myrehaug S, Tseng CL, Detsky J, Sarfehnia A, Ruschin M, Campbell M, Foster M, Das S, Lipsman N, Bjarnason GA, Atenafu EG, Maralani PJ, Soliman H. Local control and patterns of failure for "Radioresistant" spinal metastases following stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to a "Radiosensitive" reference. J Neurooncol 2021; 152:173-182. [PMID: 33453002 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03691-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The concept of a radioresistant (RR) phenotype has been challenged with use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We compared outcomes following SBRT to RR spinal metastases to a radiosensitive cohort. METHODS Renal cell, melanoma, sarcoma, gastro-intestinal, and thyroid spinal metastases were identified as RR and prostate cancer (PCA) as radiosensitive. The primary endpoint was MRI-based local failure (LF). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF). RESULTS From a prospectively maintained database of 1394 spinal segments in 605 patients treated with spine SBRT, 173 patients/395 RR spinal segments were compared to 94 patients/185 PCA segments. Most received 24-28 Gy in 2 fractions (68.9%) and median follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 1.4-84.2 months). 1- and 2-year LF rates were 19.2% and 22.4% for RR metastases, respectively, which were significantly greater (p < 0.001) than PCA (3.2% and 8.4%, respectively). Epidural disease (HR: 2.47, 95% CI 1.65-3.71, p < 0.001) and RR histology (HR: 2.41, 95% CI 1.45-3.99, p < 0.001) predicted for greater LF. Median OS was 17.4 and 61.0 months for RR and PCA cohorts, respectively. Lung/liver metastases, polymetastatic disease and epidural disease predicted for worse OS. 2-year VCF rates were ~ 13% in both cohorts. Coverage of the CTV V90 (clinical target volume receiving 90% of prescription dose) by ≥ 87% (HR: 2.32, 95% CI 1.29-4.18, p = 0.005), no prior spine radiotherapy (HR: 1.96, 95% CI 1.09-3.55, p = 0.025), and a greater Spinal Instability Neoplasia Score (p = 0.013) predicted for VCF. CONCLUSIONS Higher rates of LF were observed after spine SBRT in RR metastases. Optimization strategies include dose escalation and aggressive management of epidural disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Liang Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Zain A Husain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Arman Sarfehnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Mikki Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Monica Foster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nir Lipsman
- Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Georg A Bjarnason
- Division of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pejman Jabehdar Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rothrock RJ, Li Y, Lis E, Lobaugh S, Zhang Z, McCann P, Santos PMG, Yang TJ, Laufer I, Bilsky MH, Schmitt A, Yamada Y, Higginson DS. Hypofractionated spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy for high-grade epidural disease. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33:680-687. [PMID: 32707555 DOI: 10.3171/2020.4.spine20118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize the clinical outcomes when stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) alone is used to treat high-grade epidural disease without prior surgical decompression, the authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients treated at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2014 and 2018. The authors report locoregional failure (LRF) for a cohort of 31 cases treated with hypofractionated SBRT alone for grade 2 epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) with radioresistant primary cancer histology. METHODS High-grade epidural disease was defined as grade 2 ESCC, which is notable for radiographic deformation of the spinal cord by metastatic disease. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and cumulative incidence functions were generated to examine the survival and incidence experiences of the sample level with respect to overall survival, LRF, and subsequent requirement of vertebral same-level surgery (SLS) due to tumor progression or fracture. Associations with dosimetric analysis were also examined. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients undergoing 31 episodes of hypofractionated SBRT alone for grade 2 ESCC between 2014 and 2018 were identified. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative incidences of LRF were 10.4% (95% CI 0-21.9) and 22.0% (95% CI 5.5-38.4), respectively. The median survival was 9.81 months (95% CI 8.12-18.54). The 1-year cumulative incidence of SLS was 6.8% (95% CI 0-16.0) and the 2-year incidence of SLS was 14.5% (95% CI 0.6-28.4). All patients who progressed to requiring surgery had index lesions at the thoracic apex (T5-7). CONCLUSIONS In carefully selected patients, treatment of grade 2 ESCC disease with hypofractionated SBRT alone offers a 1-year cumulative incidence of LRF similar to that in low-grade ESCC and postseparation surgery adjuvant hypofractionated SBRT. Use of SBRT alone has a favorable safety profile and a low cumulative incidence of progressive disease requiring open surgical intervention (14.5%).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Patrick McCann
- 5Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Redmond KJ, Sciubba D, Khan M, Gui C, Lo SFL, Gokaslan ZL, Leaf B, Kleinberg L, Grimm J, Ye X, Lim M. A Phase 2 Study of Post-Operative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Solid Tumor Spine Metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:261-268. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
13
|
Moraes FY, Chen X, Yan M, Spratt DE, Redmond K, Jackson WC, Yamada YJ. Evolving Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Spine Metastases: Defining Dose and Dose Constraints. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2020; 31:167-189. [PMID: 32147009 DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2019.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
When treating solid tumor spine metastases, stereotactic high-dose-per-fraction radiation, given in a single fraction or in a hypofractionated approach, has proved to be a highly effective and safe therapeutic option for any tumor histology, in the setting of de novo therapy, as salvage treatment of local progression after previous radiation, and in the postoperative setting. There are variations in practice based on the clinical presentation, goals of therapy, as well as institutional preferences. As a biologically potent therapy, a thoughtful and careful attention to detail with patient selection, treatment planning, and delivery is crucial for treatment success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Y Moraes
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Xuguang Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael Yan
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kristen Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - William C Jackson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Yoshiya Josh Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kowalchuk RO, Waters MR, Richardson KM, Spencer K, Larner JM, Sheehan JP, McAllister WH, Kersh CR. A comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastases to the sacral spine and treatment of the thoracolumbar spine. JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT 2020; 7:95-103. [PMID: 33282463 PMCID: PMC7717089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Background: This study compares the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for sacral and thoracolumbar spine metastases. Methods: This analysis considered each sacral spine SBRT treatment at a single institution and a cohort of consecutive thoracolumbar treatments. Results: 28 patients with 35 sacral treatments and 41 patients with 49 thoracolumbar treatments were included. Local control was 63% and 90%, respectively. The sacral cohort contained more lesions with ≥2 vertebrae and epidural and paraspinal involvement. Sacral patients had larger treatment volumes, increased rates of subsequent SBRT, decreased propensity for pain improvement, and decreased local control (p=0.02 on Kaplan-Meier analysis). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PTV > 50 cc and epidural involvement were correlated with decreased local control. No cases had grade ≥3 toxicity. Conclusion: SBRT for sacral spine metastases is a distinct disease process than metastases to the thoracolumbar spine, resulting in lower rates of local control and pain improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O. Kowalchuk
- University of Virginia/Riverside, Radiosurgery Center, 500 J Clyde Morris Blvd, Newport News, VA 23601, USA
| | - Michael R. Waters
- University of Virginia/Riverside, Radiosurgery Center, 500 J Clyde Morris Blvd, Newport News, VA 23601, USA
| | - K. Martin Richardson
- University of Virginia/Riverside, Radiosurgery Center, 500 J Clyde Morris Blvd, Newport News, VA 23601, USA
| | - Kelly Spencer
- University of Virginia/Riverside, Radiosurgery Center, 500 J Clyde Morris Blvd, Newport News, VA 23601, USA
| | - James M. Larner
- University of Virginia, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - Jason P. Sheehan
- University of Virginia, Department of Neurosurgery, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA
| | - William H. McAllister
- Riverside Regional Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, 500 J Clyde Morris Blvd, Newport News, VA 23601, USA
| | - Charles R. Kersh
- University of Virginia/Riverside, Radiosurgery Center, 500 J Clyde Morris Blvd, Newport News, VA 23601, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alghamdi M, Sahgal A, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Yang VXD, Das S, Wilson J, Campbell M, Lee YK, Cawricz M, Da Costa L, Atenafu EG, Tseng CL. Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases and the Impact of Epidural Disease Grade. Neurosurgery 2019; 85:E1111-E1118. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Postoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (pSBRT) is an emerging indication for spinal metastases (SM).
OBJECTIVE
To report our experience with pSBRT for SM.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review was performed for prospectively collected data of patients treated between September 2008 to December 2015 with pSBRT and followed with serial spinal MRIs every 2 to 3 mo until death or last follow-up. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictive factors.
RESULTS
A total of 83 spinal segments in 47 patients treated with a median dose of 24 Gy in 2 fractions were included, with mostly lung and breast primaries. A total of 59.3% had preoperative high-grade epidural disease (ED) and 39.7% were unstable. The 12-mo cumulative incidence of local failure was 17% for all segments, and 33.3%, 21.8%, and 0% in segments with postoperative high-grade, low-grade, and no ED, respectively. Downgrading preoperative ED was predictive of better local control (P = .03). The grade of postoperative ED was also predictive for local control (P < .0001), as was a longer interval between prior radiotherapy and pSBRT in those previously irradiated (P = .004). The 12-mo overall survival rate was 55%. One case of radiculopathy, 3 vertebral compression fractures, and no cases of myelopathy, hardware failure, or skin breakdown were observed.
CONCLUSION
pSBRT is an effective and safe treatment. The association between downgrading preoperative ED and better local control following pSBRT is confirmed and supports the concept of separation surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majed Alghamdi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Al Baha University, Al Baha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Victor X D Yang
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sunit Das
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jefferson Wilson
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mikki Campbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Young K Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Monica Cawricz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Leo Da Costa
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mossa-Basha M, Gerszten PC, Myrehaug S, Mayr NA, Yuh WT, Jabehdar Maralani P, Sahgal A, Lo SS. Spinal metastasis: diagnosis, management and follow-up. Br J Radiol 2019; 92:20190211. [PMID: 31322920 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Spine metastatic disease is an increasingly common occurrence in cancer patients due to improved patient survival. Close proximity of the bony spinal column to the spinal cord limits many conventional treatments for metastatic disease. In the past decade, we have witnessed dramatic advancements in therapies, with improvements in surgical techniques and recent adoption of spine stereotactic radiotherapy techniques leading to improved patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary approaches to patient evaluation, treatment and follow-up are essential. Imaging plays an ever increasing role in disease detection, pre-treatment planning and assessment of patient outcomes. It is important for the radiologist to be familiar with imaging algorithms, best practices for surgery and/or radiotherapy and imaging findings in the post-treatment period that may indicate disease recurrence. In this review, we present a multidisciplinary discussion of spine metastases, with specific focus on pre-treatment imaging, planning, current treatment approaches, and post-treatment assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter C Gerszten
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Nina A Mayr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - William Tc Yuh
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Pejman Jabehdar Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zeng KL, Tseng CL, Soliman H, Weiss Y, Sahgal A, Myrehaug S. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Oligometastatic Spine Metastases: An Overview. Front Oncol 2019; 9:337. [PMID: 31119099 PMCID: PMC6504814 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The oligometastatic state is hypothesized to represent an intermediary state of cancer between widely metastatic disease and curable, localized disease. Advancements in radiotherapy have allowed for delivery of high precision, dose escalated treatment known as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to targets throughout the body with excellent rates of local control. Recently, the first phase II randomized trial comparing conventional radiotherapy to comprehensive SBRT of oligometastatic disease demonstrated an overall survival and progression free survival advantage. The spine is a common site of metastasis, and a complex site for SBRT given the adjacent spinal cord and the tumor embedded within the bone tissue putting the patient at risk of fracture. Although there are expert spine SBRT guidelines for practice, there are as yet no reported randomized trials that proves superiority as compared to conventional radiation. The use of SBRT in patients with oligometastatic disease and spinal metastases is the focus of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kang Liang Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yonatan Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Meleis A, Jhawar SR, Weiner JP, Majmundar N, Mahtabfar A, Lin Y, Jabbour S, Danish S, Goyal S. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Nonsurgical Patients with Metastatic Spinal Disease and Epidural Compression: A Retrospective Review. World Neurosurg 2019; 122:e198-e205. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
19
|
Ito K, Nihei K, Shimizuguchi T, Ogawa H, Furuya T, Sugita S, Hozumi T, Keisuke Sasai, Karasawa K. Postoperative re-irradiation using stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. J Neurosurg Spine 2018; 29:332-338. [DOI: 10.3171/2018.1.spine171155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to clarify the outcomes of postoperative re-irradiation using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) in the authors’ institution and to identify factors correlated with local control.METHODSCases in which patients with previously irradiated MESCC underwent decompression surgery followed by spine SBRT as re-irradiation between April 2013 and May 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical procedures were mainly performed by the posterior approach and included decompression and fixation. The prescribed dose for spine SBRT was 24 Gy in 2 fractions. The primary outcome was local control, which was defined as elimination, shrinkage, or no change of the tumor on CT or MRI obtained approximately every 3 months after SBRT. In addition, various patient-, treatment-, and tumor-specific factors were evaluated to determine their predictive value for local control.RESULTSTwenty-eight cases were identified in the authors’ institutional databases as meeting the inclusion criteria. The histology of the primary disease was thyroid cancer in 7 cases, lung cancer in 6, renal cancer in 3, colorectal cancer in 3, and other cancers in 9. The most common previous radiation dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions (15 cases). The mean interval since the most recent irradiation was 16 months (range 5–132 months). The median duration of follow-up after SBRT was 13 months (range 4–38 months). The 1-year local control rate was 70%. In the analysis of factors related to local control, Bilsky grade, number of vertebral levels in the treatment target, the interval between the latest radiotherapy and SBRT, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA), the prognostic index for spinal metastases (PRISM), and the revised Tokuhashi score were not significantly correlated with local control. The favorable group classified by the Rades prognostic score achieved a significantly higher 1-year local control rate than the unfavorable group (1-year local control rate: 100% vs 33%; p < 0.01). Radiation-induced myelopathy and vertebral compression fracture were observed in 1 and 3 patients, respectively. No other grade 3 or greater toxicities were encountered.CONCLUSIONSThe results indicate that spine SBRT as postoperative re-irradiation was effective, and it was especially useful for patients classified as having a good survival prognosis according to the Rades score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Ito
- 1Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, and
- 3Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiji Nihei
- 1Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, and
| | | | - Hiroaki Ogawa
- 1Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, and
| | - Tomohisa Furuya
- 1Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, and
| | - Shurei Sugita
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital; and
| | - Takahiro Hozumi
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital; and
| | - Keisuke Sasai
- 3Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Husain ZA, Sahgal A, Chang EL, Maralani PJ, Kubicky CD, Redmond KJ, Fisher C, Laufer I, Lo SS. Modern approaches to the management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression. CNS Oncol 2017; 6:231-241. [PMID: 28718323 PMCID: PMC6009217 DOI: 10.2217/cns-2016-0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2016] [Accepted: 02/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is an oncologic emergency requiring prompt treatment to maximize neurologic function, ambulatory function and local control. Traditionally, options for MESCC included external beam radiation therapy with or without surgery. Surgery has usually been reserved for the patient with optimal performance status, single level MESCC or mechanical instability. Advances in external beam radiation therapy such as the development of stereotactic body radiation therapy have allowed for the delivery of high-dose radiation, allowing for both long-term pain and local control. Surgical advances, such as separation surgery, minimal access spine surgery and percutaneous instrumentation, have decreased surgical morbidity. This review summarizes the latest advances and evidence in MESCC to enable modern management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zain A Husain
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Norris Cancer Center & Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Pejman Jabehdar Maralani
- Department of Medical imaging, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Charlotte D Kubicky
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health Science Center, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Charles Fisher
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada
| | - Ilya Laufer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Barzilai O, Laufer I, Yamada Y, Higginson DS, Schmitt AM, Lis E, Bilsky MH. Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine for Treatment of Spinal Metastases Into a Decision Framework: Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanicals Stability, and Systemic Disease. J Clin Oncol 2017. [PMID: 28640703 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.72.7362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer are frequently affected by spinal metastases. Treatment is palliative, with the principle goals of pain relief, preservation of neurologic function, and improvement in quality of life. In the past decade, we have witnessed a dramatic change in the treatment paradigms due to the development of improved surgical strategies and systemic and radiation therapy. The most important change to these paradigms has been the integration of spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS), allowing delivery of tumoricidal radiation doses with sparing of nearby organs at risk. High-dose SSRS provides durable tumor control when used either as definitive therapy or as a postoperative adjuvant therapy. Integration of SSRS has fundamentally changed the indications for and type of surgery performed for metastatic spine tumors. Although the role for surgical intervention is well established, a clear trend toward less-aggressive, often minimally invasive techniques has been observed. Targeted therapies are also rapidly changing the way cancer is being treated and have demonstrated improved survival for a number of malignancies. As these treatment decisions become more complex, a multidisciplinary approach including medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, interventionalists, and pain specialists is required. In this article, the current evidence affecting the treatment of spinal metastases is integrated into a decision framework that considers four principal assessments of a patient's spine disease: NOMS (neurologic, oncologic, mechanical instability, and systemic disease).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ori Barzilai
- Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Yoshiya Yamada, Daniel S. Higginson, Adam M. Schmitt, Eric Lis, and Mark H. Bilsky, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ilya Laufer and Mark H. Bilsky, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Ilya Laufer
- Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Yoshiya Yamada, Daniel S. Higginson, Adam M. Schmitt, Eric Lis, and Mark H. Bilsky, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ilya Laufer and Mark H. Bilsky, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Yoshiya Yamada, Daniel S. Higginson, Adam M. Schmitt, Eric Lis, and Mark H. Bilsky, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ilya Laufer and Mark H. Bilsky, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Daniel S Higginson
- Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Yoshiya Yamada, Daniel S. Higginson, Adam M. Schmitt, Eric Lis, and Mark H. Bilsky, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ilya Laufer and Mark H. Bilsky, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Adam M Schmitt
- Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Yoshiya Yamada, Daniel S. Higginson, Adam M. Schmitt, Eric Lis, and Mark H. Bilsky, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ilya Laufer and Mark H. Bilsky, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Eric Lis
- Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Yoshiya Yamada, Daniel S. Higginson, Adam M. Schmitt, Eric Lis, and Mark H. Bilsky, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ilya Laufer and Mark H. Bilsky, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Mark H Bilsky
- Ori Barzilai, Ilya Laufer, Yoshiya Yamada, Daniel S. Higginson, Adam M. Schmitt, Eric Lis, and Mark H. Bilsky, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Ilya Laufer and Mark H. Bilsky, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tseng CL, Eppinga W, Charest-Morin R, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Maralani PJ, Campbell M, Lee YK, Fisher C, Fehlings MG, Chang EL, Lo SS, Sahgal A. Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Indications, Outcomes, and Points of Caution. Global Spine J 2017; 7:179-197. [PMID: 28507888 PMCID: PMC5415159 DOI: 10.1177/2192568217694016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A broad narrative review. OBJECTIVES The objective of this article is to provide a technical review of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning and delivery, indications for treatment, outcomes, complications, and the challenges of response assessment. The surgical approach to spinal metastases is discussed with an overview of emerging minimally invasive techniques. METHODS A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted on the techniques, outcomes, and developments in SBRT and surgery for spinal metastases. RESULTS The optimal management of patients with spinal metastases is complex and requires multidisciplinary assessment from an oncologic team that is familiar with the shifting paradigm as a consequence of evolving techniques in surgery and stereotactic radiation, as well as new developments in systemic agents. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score and the epidural spinal cord compression (Bilsky) grading system are useful tools that facilitate communication among oncologic team members and can direct management by providing a baseline assessment of risks prior to therapy. The combined multimodality approach with "separation surgery" followed by postoperative spine SBRT achieves thecal sac decompression, improves tumor control, and avoids complications that may be associated with more extensive surgery. CONCLUSION Spine SBRT is a highly effective treatment that is capable of delivering ablative doses to the target while sparing the critical organs-at-risk, chiefly the critical neural tissues, within a short and manageable schedule. At the same time, surgery occupies an important role in select patients, particularly with the expanding availability and expertise in minimally invasive techniques. With rapid adoption of spine SBRT in centers outside of the academic setting, it is imperative for the practicing oncologist to understand the relevance and application of these evolving concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Lin Tseng
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada,Chia-Lin Tseng, Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4 N 3M5.
| | - Wietse Eppinga
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Hany Soliman
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Mikki Campbell
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Young K. Lee
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charles Fisher
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Eric L. Chang
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Arjun Sahgal
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bian C, Chen N, Li XL, Zhou XG, Lin H, Jiang LB, Liu WM, Chen Q, Dong J. Surgery Combined with Radiotherapy to Treat Spinal Tumors: A Review of Published Reports. Orthop Surg 2017; 8:97-104. [PMID: 27384717 DOI: 10.1111/os.12230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2015] [Accepted: 02/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal tumors result in high morbidity and a high rate of lower limb paralysis. Both surgical therapy and radiation therapy (RT) are used to treat spinal tumors; however, how best to combine these two therapies to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks is still being debated. It is also difficult to decide the optimal timing, course and dose of RT, especially in pregnant women and children. The aim of this review is to assist surgeons who are dealing with spinal tumors by providing comprehensive information about advanced techniques for administering RT with greater precision and safety, and about the impact of various ways of combining surgery and RT on therapeutic outcomes. We here review published reports about treating spinal tumors with a combination of these two forms of therapy and attempt to draw appropriate conclusions concerning selection of optimal treatment protocols. Our conclusion is that postoperative radiotherapy, especially with high-precision, low-dose and multiple fractions, and brachytherapy are promising therapies to combined with surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chong Bian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nong Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Qingpu Branch, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi-Lei Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiao-Gang Zhou
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hong Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Li-Bo Jiang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wang-Mi Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qian Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Dong
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Huo M, Sahgal A, Pryor D, Redmond K, Lo S, Foote M. Stereotactic spine radiosurgery: Review of safety and efficacy with respect to dose and fractionation. Surg Neurol Int 2017; 8:30. [PMID: 28303210 PMCID: PMC5339918 DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.200581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Accepted: 12/30/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment option for spinal metastases with demonstrated efficacy in the upfront, postoperative, and re-treatment settings, as well as for tumor histologies considered radioresistant. Uncertainty exists regarding the optimal dose and fractionation schedule, with single and multifraction regimens commonly utilized. METHODS A literature search of the PubMed and Medline databases was conducted to identify papers specific to spine SBRT and the effect of varying dose/fractionation regimens on outcomes. Bibliographies of relevant papers were searched for further references, and international spine SBRT experts were consulted. RESULTS Local control rates generally exceed 80% at 1 year, while high rates of pain control have been attained. There is insufficient evidence to suggest superiority of either single or multiple fraction regimens with respect to local control and pain control. Low rates of toxicity have been reported, assuming strict dose constraints are respected. Radiation myelopathy may be the most morbid toxicity, although the rates are low. The risk of vertebral compression fracture appears to be associated with higher doses per fraction such as those used in single-fraction regimens. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score should be considered when evaluating patients for spine SBRT, and prophylactic stabilisation may be warranted. Pain flare is a relatively common toxicity which may be mediated with prophylactic dexamethasone. Because of the treatment complexity and potentially serious toxicities, strict quality assurance should occur at the organizational, planning, dosimetric, and treatment delivery levels. CONCLUSION Both single and multifraction regimens are safe and efficacious in spine SBRT for spinal metastases. There may be advantages to hypofractionated treatment over single-fraction regimens with respect to toxicity. Ongoing investigation is underway to define optimal dose and fractionation schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Huo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Pryor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kristin Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA
| | - Simon Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - Matthew Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Redmond KJ, Lo SS, Soltys SG, Yamada Y, Barani IJ, Brown PD, Chang EL, Gerszten PC, Chao ST, Amdur RJ, De Salles AAF, Guckenberger M, Teh BS, Sheehan J, Kersh CR, Fehlings MG, Sohn MJ, Chang UK, Ryu S, Gibbs IC, Sahgal A. Consensus guidelines for postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases: results of an international survey. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 26:299-306. [PMID: 27834628 DOI: 10.3171/2016.8.spine16121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases is increasingly performed, few guidelines exist for this application. The purpose of this study is to develop consensus guidelines to promote safe and effective treatment for patients with spinal metastases. METHODS Fifteen radiation oncologists and 5 neurosurgeons, representing 19 centers in 4 countries and having a collective experience of more than 1300 postoperative spine SBRT cases, completed a 19-question survey about postoperative spine SBRT practice. Responses were defined as follows: 1) consensus: selected by ≥ 75% of respondents; 2) predominant: selected by 50% of respondents or more; and 3) controversial: no single response selected by a majority of respondents. RESULTS Consensus treatment indications included: radioresistant primary, 1-2 levels of adjacent disease, and previous radiation therapy. Contraindications included: involvement of more than 3 contiguous vertebral bodies, ASIA Grade A status (complete spinal cord injury without preservation of motor or sensory function), and postoperative Bilsky Grade 3 residual (cord compression without any CSF around the cord). For treatment planning, co-registration of the preoperative MRI and postoperative T1-weighted MRI (with or without gadolinium) and delineation of the cord on the T2-weighted MRI (and/or CT myelogram in cases of significant hardware artifact) were predominant. Consensus GTV (gross tumor volume) was the postoperative residual tumor based on MRI. Predominant CTV (clinical tumor volume) practice was to include the postoperative bed defined as the entire extent of preoperative tumor, the relevant anatomical compartment and any residual disease. Consensus was achieved with respect to not including the surgical hardware and incision in the CTV. PTV (planning tumor volume) expansion was controversial, ranging from 0 to 2 mm. The spinal cord avoidance structure was predominantly the true cord. Circumferential treatment of the epidural space and margin for paraspinal extension was controversial. Prescription doses and spinal cord tolerances based on clinical scenario, neurological compromise, and prior overlapping treatments were controversial, but reasonable ranges are presented. Fifty percent of those surveyed practiced an integrated boost to areas of residual tumor and density override for hardware within the beam path. Acceptable PTV coverage was controversial, but consensus was achieved with respect to compromising coverage to meet cord constraint and fractionation to improve coverage while meeting cord constraint. CONCLUSIONS The consensus by spinal radiosurgery experts suggests that postoperative SBRT is indicated for radioresistant primary lesions, disease confined to 1-2 vertebral levels, and/or prior overlapping radiotherapy. The GTV is the postoperative residual tumor, and the CTV is the postoperative bed defined as the entire extent of preoperative tumor and anatomical compartment plus residual disease. Hardware and scar do not need to be included in CTV. While predominant agreement was reached about treatment planning and definition of organs at risk, future investigation will be critical in better understanding areas of controversy, including whether circumferential treatment of the epidural space is necessary, management of paraspinal extension, and the optimal dose fractionation schedules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, The John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Igor J Barani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Norris Cancer Center and Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California
| | - Peter C Gerszten
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neurooncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Robert J Amdur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Antonio A F De Salles
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Bin S Teh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Cancer Center and Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville
| | - Charles R Kersh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Riverside Radiation Oncology Specialists, Newport News, Virginia
| | - Michael G Fehlings
- Division of Neurosurgery and Spine Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto
| | - Moon-Jun Sohn
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Radiosurgery Center, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Goyang; and
| | - Ung-Kyu Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Samuel Ryu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Iris C Gibbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chang JH, Shin JH, Yamada YJ, Mesfin A, Fehlings MG, Rhines LD, Sahgal A. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases: What are the Risks and How Do We Minimize Them? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41 Suppl 20:S238-S245. [PMID: 27488294 PMCID: PMC5552170 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic literature review. OBJECTIVES To summarize the risks of 3 key complications of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases, that is, radiation myelopathy (RM), vertebral compression fracture (VCF), and epidural disease progression, and to discuss strategies for minimizing them. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA RM, VCF and epidural disease progression are now recognized as important risks following SBRT for spine metastases. It is unclear at this stage exactly how large these risks are and what strategies can be employed to minimize these risks. METHODS A systematic review of the literature using MEDLINE and a review of the bibliographies of reviewed articles on SBRT for spinal metastases were conducted. RESULTS The initial literature search revealed a total of 376 articles, of which 38 were pertinent to the study objectives. The risk of RM following SBRT was found to be dependent on the maximum dose to the spinal cord and estimated to be ≤5% if the recommended published thecal sac dose constraints are adhered to. The crude risk of VCF was 13.7% (range: 0.7%-40.5%), and, on average, 45% were surgically salvaged. It has been shown that the risk of VCF is dependent on several anatomic and tumor-related factors including the SBRT dose per fraction. The crude risk of local failure at 1 year was 21.4% (range: 12%-27%) of which 67% (range: 38%-96%) occurred within the epidural space. The grade of epidural disease has been shown to be associated with the risk of local failure. CONCLUSION The risk of RM after spinal SBRT is low in particular if recommended dose metrics are adhered to. There is a significant risk of both VCF and epidural disease progression after spinal SBRT. These risks can potentially be minimized by identifying the risk factors for these complications, and performing careful radiotherapy and surgical planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joe H. Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John H. Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Yoshiya J. Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Addisu Mesfin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Michael G. Fehlings
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spinal Program, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laurence D. Rhines
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Redmond KJ, Robertson S, Lo SS, Soltys SG, Ryu S, McNutt T, Chao ST, Yamada Y, Ghia A, Chang EL, Sheehan J, Sahgal A. Consensus Contouring Guidelines for Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Solid Tumor Malignancies to the Spine. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 97:64-74. [PMID: 27843035 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop consensus contouring guidelines for postoperative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten spine SBRT specialists representing 10 international centers independently contoured the clinical target volume (CTV), planning target volume (PTV), spinal cord, and spinal cord planning organ at risk volume (PRV) for 10 representative clinical scenarios in postoperative spine SBRT for metastatic solid tumor malignancies. Contours were imported into the Computational Environment for Radiotherapy Research. Agreement between physicians was calculated with an expectation minimization algorithm using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation with κ statistics. Target volume definition guidelines were established by finding optimized confidence level consensus contours using histogram agreement analyses. RESULTS Nine expert radiation oncologists and 1 neurosurgeon completed contours for all 10 cases. The mean sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 (range, 0.71-0.89) and 0.94 (range, 0.90-0.99) for the CTV and 0.79 (range, 0.70-0.95) and 0.92 (range, 0.87-0.99) for the PTV), respectively. Mean κ agreement, which demonstrates the probability that contours agree by chance alone, was 0.58 (range, 0.43-0.70) for CTV and 0.58 (range, 0.37-0.76) for PTV (P<.001 for all cases). Optimized consensus contours were established for all patients with 80% confidence interval. Recommendations for CTV include treatment of the entire preoperative extent of bony and epidural disease, plus immediately adjacent bony anatomic compartments at risk of microscopic disease extension. In particular, a "donut-shaped" CTV was consistently applied in cases of preoperative circumferential epidural extension, regardless of extent of residual epidural extension. Otherwise more conformal anatomic-based CTVs were determined and described. Spinal instrumentation was consistently excluded from the CTV. CONCLUSIONS We provide consensus contouring guidelines for common scenarios in postoperative SBRT for spinal metastases. These consensus guidelines are subject to clinical validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Scott Robertson
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Samuel Ryu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Todd McNutt
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Samuel T Chao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amol Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eric L Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Norris Cancer Center and Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jason Sheehan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Postoperative Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Spine Metastases: A Critical Review to Guide Practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:1414-1428. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2015] [Revised: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|