1
|
Chan K, Keane A, Pradhan S, King T, Moroco A, Goyal N, Choi KY. Postoperative Urinary Complications in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstructive Surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2024; 133:284-291. [PMID: 37902061 PMCID: PMC10865755 DOI: 10.1177/00034894231208256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to evaluate the postoperative urinary complications and the optimal timing of foley catheter removal in patients who underwent free flap reconstructive surgery for head and neck pathology. METHODS A retrospective case-control study of head and neck patients who underwent free flap reconstructive surgery at a single institution between January 2009 and December 2021 was conducted. Patient risk factors for postoperative urinary retention (POUR) were analyzed. Fisher Exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were used to evaluate rates of foley replacement, straight catheterization, and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and associated risk factors. RESULTS Two hundred and eleven patients were included in this study. Older age, lower BMI, lower intraoperative fluid volumes, and need for straight catheterization were statistically significant for POUR requiring foley replacement. Shorter total (P = .04) and postoperative (P = .01) foley duration showed statistical significance for POUR requiring straight catheterization. About 60% of patients who had straight catheterization required a foley replacement (P < .001). Only one patient (0.5%) developed a urinary tract infection (UTI). CONCLUSION Foley catheter duration impacts the risk of POUR requiring straight catheterization and subsequently, foley replacement. Optimal timing for foley catheter removal in the postoperative period remains to be elucidated. Removal of catheters between 21 and 48 hours after surgery may decrease the risk of POUR without increasing the rate of CAUTI in patients with head and neck pathology undergoing free flap reconstructive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Chan
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Allison Keane
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Sandeep Pradhan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Tonya King
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Annie Moroco
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Neerav Goyal
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Karen Y. Choi
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bridges T, Meade M, Brush P, Lee Y, Narayanan R, McCurdy MA, Lambrechts M, Charlton A, Jenkins E, Juniewicz R, Destine H, Kaye ID, Kurd M, Canseco J, Hilibrand A, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder G, Kepler C. Early Diet Liberalization After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Improves Postoperative Recovery. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231223461. [PMID: 38149647 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231223461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to assess the impact of diet liberalization on short-term outcomes in patients undergoing anterior interbody lumbar fusion (ALIF). METHODS A retrospective review was performed for patients undergoing ALIF at our tertiary care center institution from 2010 to 2022. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographics, surgical characteristics, and 90-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS We included 515 patients in this study with 102 patients receiving a full diet on the same day as their operation. All other patients had a delay of at least 1 day (average 1.6 days) until a full diet was provided. This group was found to have a higher rate of postoperative ileus (10.2% vs 2.9%) and urinary retention (16.0% vs 3.9%). The readmission rate and percent of patients presenting to the emergency department within 90 days postoperatively were similar. On multivariate regression analysis, same-day, full-diet patients had decreased odds of developing urinary retention (OR = .17) and a shorter length of hospital stay (Estimate: -.99). Immediate full diet had no impact on the development of ileus (OR: .33). CONCLUSIONS An immediate postoperative full diet following an anterior approach to the lumbar spine was not found to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative ileus in patients deemed appropriate for early diet liberalization. Moreover, an early full diet was found to reduce length of hospitalization and risk of postoperative urinary retention. Reconsideration of postoperative diet protocols may help optimize patient outcomes and recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Bridges
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jefferson Health in New Jersey, Stratford, NJ, USA
| | - Matthew Meade
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jefferson Health in New Jersey, Stratford, NJ, USA
| | - Parker Brush
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Yunsoo Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rajkishen Narayanan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael A McCurdy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark Lambrechts
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alex Charlton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Eleanor Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Robert Juniewicz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Henson Destine
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ian David Kaye
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mark Kurd
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jose Canseco
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alan Hilibrand
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander R Vaccaro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gregory Schroeder
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christopher Kepler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Instituteat Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heard JC, Lee Y, Lambrechts MJ, Ezeonu T, Dees AN, Wiafe BM, Wright J, Toci GR, Schwenk ES, Canseco JA, Kaye ID, Kurd MF, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK. Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Anesthetics and Surgical Approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:1189-1196. [PMID: 37695724 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after lumbar fusion surgery can lead to longer hospital stays and thus increased risk of developing other postoperative complications. Therefore, we aimed to determine the relationship between POUR and (1) surgical approach and (2) anesthetic agents, including sugammadex and glycopyrrolate. METHODS After institutional review board approval, L4-S1 single-level lumbar fusion surgeries between 2018 and 2021 were identified. A 3:1 propensity match of patients with POUR to those without was conducted, controlling for patient age, sex, diabetes status, body mass index, smoking status, history of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and the number of levels decompressed. POUR was defined as documented straight catheterization yielding >400 mL. We compared patient demographic, surgical, anesthetic, and postoperative characteristics. A bivariant analysis and backward multivariable stepwise logistic regression analysis ( P -value < 0.200) were performed. Significance was set to P < 0.05. RESULTS Of the 899 patients identified, 51 met the criteria for POUR and were matched to 153 patients. No notable differences were observed between groups based on demographic or surgical characteristics. On bivariant analysis, patients who developed POUR were more likely to have been given succinylcholine (13.7% vs. 3.92%, P = 0.020) as an induction agent. The independent predictors of POUR identified by multivariable analysis included the use of succinylcholine {odds ratio (OR), 4.37 (confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 16.46), P = 0.022} and reduced postoperative activity (OR, 0.99 [CI, 0.993 to 0.999], P = 0.049). Factors protective against POUR included using sugammadex as a reversal agent (OR, 0.38 [CI, 0.17 to 0.82], P = 0.017). The stepwise regression did not identify an anterior surgical approach as a notable predictor of POUR. CONCLUSION We demonstrate that sugammadex for anesthesia reversal was protective against POUR while succinylcholine and reduced postoperative activity were associated with the development of POUR. In addition, we found no difference between the anterior or posterior approach to spinal fusion in the development of POUR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C Heard
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA (Heard, Lee, Ezeonu, Dees, Wiafe, Wright, Toci, Canseco, Kaye, Kurd, Hilibrand, Vaccaro, Schroeder, and Kepler), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (Lambrechts), and the Department Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA (Schwenk)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Porche K, Maciel CB, Lucke-Wold B, Mehkri Y, Murtaza Y, Goutnik M, Robicsek SA, Busl KM. Pre-operative prediction of post-operative urinary retention in lumbar surgery: a prospective validation of machine learning model. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:3868-3874. [PMID: 37768336 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07954-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Predicting urinary retention is difficult. The aim of this study is to prospectively validate a previously developed model using machine learning techniques. METHODS Patients were recruited from pre-operative clinic. Prediction of urinary retention was completed pre-operatively by 4 individuals and compared to ground truth POUR outcomes. Inter-rater reliability was calculated with intercorrelation coefficient (2,1). RESULTS 171 patients were included with age 63 ± 14 years, 58.5% (100/171) male, BMI 30.4 ± 5.9 kg/m2, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2.6 ± 0.5, 1.7 ± 1.0 levels, 56% (96/171) fusions. The observed rate of POUR was 25.7%. The model's performance was found to be 0.663 (0.567-0.759). With a regression model probability cutoff of 0.24 and a neural network cutoff of 0.23, the following predictive power was achieved: specificity 90.6%, sensitivity 22.7%, negative predictive value 77.2%, positive predictive value 45.5%, and accuracy 73.1%. Intercorrelation coefficient for the regression aspect of the model was found to be 0.889 and intercorrelation coefficient for the neural network aspect of the model was found to be 0.874. CONCLUSIONS This prospective study confirms performance of the prediction model for POUR developed with retrospective data, showing great correlation. This supports the use of machine learning techniques in the prediction of postoperative complications such as urinary retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Porche
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, PO Box 100265, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
| | - Carolina B Maciel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, PO Box 100265, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Brandon Lucke-Wold
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, PO Box 100265, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Yusuf Mehkri
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Yasmeen Murtaza
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Michael Goutnik
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Steven A Robicsek
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Katharina M Busl
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, PO Box 100265, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jasinski J, Tong D, Yoon E, Claus C, Lytle E, Houseman C, Bono P, Soo TM. Preventing Postoperative Urinary Retention (POUR) in Patients Undergoing Elective Lumbar Surgery: A Quality Improvement Project. Qual Manag Health Care 2023; 32:270-277. [PMID: 36913773 DOI: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is associated with significant morbidity. Our institution's POUR rate was elevated among patients undergoing elective lumbar spinal surgery. We sought to demonstrate that our quality improvement (QI) intervention would significantly lower our POUR rate and length of stay (LOS). METHODS A resident-led QI intervention was implemented from October 2017 to 2018 on 422 patients in an academically affiliated community teaching hospital. This consisted of standardized intraoperative indwelling catheter utilization, postoperative catheterization protocol, prophylactic tamsulosin, and early ambulation after surgery. Baseline data on 277 patients were collected retrospectively from October 2015 to September 2016. Primary outcomes were POUR and LOS. The focus, analyze, develop, execute, and evaluate (FADE) model was used. Multivariable analyses were used. P value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS We analyzed 699 patients (277 pre-intervention vs 422 post-intervention). The POUR rate (6.9% vs 2.6%, Δ confidence interval [CI] 1.15-8.08, P = .007) and mean LOS (2.94 ± 1.87 days vs 2.56 ± 2.2 days, Δ CI 0.066-0.68, P = .017) were significantly improved following our intervention. Logistic regression demonstrated that the intervention was independently associated with significantly decreased odds for developing POUR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.38, CI 0.17-0.83, P = .015). Diabetes (OR = 2.25, CI 1.03-4.92, P = .04) and longer surgery duration (OR = 1.006, CI 1.002-1.01, P = .002) were independently associated with increased odds of developing POUR. CONCLUSIONS After implementing our POUR QI project for patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery, the institutional POUR rate significantly decreased by 4.3% (62% reduction) and LOS, by 0.37 days. We demonstrated that a standardized POUR care bundle was independently associated with a significant decrease in the odds of developing POUR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Jasinski
- Division of Neurosurgery, Ascension Providence Hospital, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Southfield
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nie JW, Hartman TJ, MacGregor KR, Oyetayo OO, Zheng E, Federico VP, Massel DH, Sayari AJ, Singh K. Preoperative predictors of prolonged hospitalization in patients undergoing lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:2615-2624. [PMID: 37318634 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05648-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to examine the preoperative factors associated with increased postoperative length of stay in patients undergoing LLIF in the hospital setting. METHODS Patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected from a single-surgeon database. Patients undergoing LLIF in the hospital setting were separated into postoperative LOS <48 h (H) and LOS ≥ 48H. Univariate analysis for preoperative characteristics was utilized to determine covariates for multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression was then utilized to determine significant predictors of extended postoperative length of stay. Secondary univariate analysis of inpatient complications, operative, and postoperative characteristics were calculated to determine postoperative factors associated with prolonged hospitalization. RESULTS Two-hundred and forty patients were identified with 115 patients' LOS ≥ 48H. Univariate analysis identified age/Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score/gender/insurance type/number of contiguous fused levels/preoperative PROMs of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) back/VAS leg/Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS-PF)/Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)/degenerative spondylolisthesis diagnoses/foraminal stenosis/central stenosis for multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable logistic regression calculated significant positive predictors of LOS ≥ 48H to be age/3-level fusion/preoperative ODI scores. Negative predictors of LOS ≥ 48H were the diagnosis of foraminal stenosis/preoperative PROMIS-PF/male gender. The secondary analysis determined that patients with longer operative time/estimated blood loss/transfusion/postoperative day 0 and 1 pain and narcotic consumption/complications of altered mental status/postoperative anemia/fever/ileus/urinary retention were associated with prolonged hospitalization. CONCLUSION Older patients undergoing LLIF with greater preoperative disability and 3-level fusion were more likely to require prolonged hospitalization. Male patients with higher preoperative physical function and who were diagnosed with foraminal stenosis were less likely to require prolonged hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James W Nie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Timothy J Hartman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Keith R MacGregor
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Omolabake O Oyetayo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Eileen Zheng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Vincent P Federico
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Dustin H Massel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Arash J Sayari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Butler AJ, Mohile N, Phillips FM. Postoperative Spinal Hematoma and Seroma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2023; 31:908-913. [PMID: 37071898 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-01022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Fluid collections after spine surgery are rare complications, although potentially grave, and may be broadly grouped into two major categories. Symptomatic postoperative epidural hematomas have some known risk factors and can present with a widely variable profile of signs and symptoms. Treatment involves emergent surgical evacuation to reduce the risk of permanent neurologic deficit. Postoperative seroma may lead to disruption of wound healing and deep infection and has been associated with the use of recombinant human bone mineral protein. These diagnoses may present diagnostic challenges; thorough understanding of the involved pathophysiology, meticulous clinical evaluation, and radiographic interpretation are critical to appropriate management and optimal outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Butler
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital Northwell Health, New York, NY (Butler), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL (Mohile), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (Phillips)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shan L, Sun P, Zhang W, Zheng X, Li H, Wang S. Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1214349. [PMID: 37693901 PMCID: PMC10485607 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1214349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prophylactic effect of alpha blockers against postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in orthopaedic patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched between 1 January 1990 and 1 March 2023. The studies reporting the preventive efficacy of alpha blockers on POUR after orthopaedic procedures were identified. The pooled rates of POUR in the Intervention group (patients receiving alpha blockers) and the Control group (patients not receiving alpha blockers) were estimated and compared. The risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed based on surgical type. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to confirm the robustness of pooled results. Results: Seven studies containing 1,607 patients were identified. The rates of POUR were similar between the two groups (Intervention group: 126/748 [16.8%] VS. Control group: 168/859 [19.6%]; RR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 1.09; p = 0.130; Heterogeneity: I2 = 67.1%; p = 0.006). No significant difference in the incidence of POUR was observed in either the Arthroplasty subgroup or Spine surgery subgroup. The result of TSA suggested that the total sample size of the existing evidence might be insufficient to draw conclusive results. Administrating alpha blockers was associated with a higher risk of complications (88/651 [13.5%] VS. 56/766 [7.3%]; RR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.37; p = 0.0005; Heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; p = 0.69). Conclusion: Prophylactic alpha blockers do not reduce the risk of POUR in orthopaedic procedures, and administrating these drugs was associated with a higher risk of complications. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=409388.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianliang Shan
- Department of Hand Surgery/Foot and Ankle Surgery, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, Shandong, China
| | - Ping Sun
- Department of Hand Surgery/Foot and Ankle Surgery, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, Shandong, China
| | - Wenping Zhang
- Department of Hand Surgery/Foot and Ankle Surgery, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, Shandong, China
| | - Xuelian Zheng
- Dongying Vocational Institute, Dongying, Shandong, China
| | - Hua Li
- Department of Bone/Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Songling Wang
- Department of Hand Surgery/Foot and Ankle Surgery, Shengli Oilfield Central Hospital, Dongying, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reed LA, Mihas AK, Fortin TA, Donley CJ, Pratheep G, Rajaram Manoharan S, Theiss SM, Viswanathan VK. Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Current Literature and Meta-Analysis. Global Spine J 2023; 13:1658-1670. [PMID: 36562179 PMCID: PMC10448081 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221146493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication following lumbar spine surgery (LSS) and timely recognition is imperative to avoid long-term consequences. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to systematically review the literature in order to identify risk factors associated with POUR after LSS. METHODS In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed using Pubmed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE database for articles on POUR following LSS. A meta-analysis was performed comparing patients with and without POUR; and the factors associated with this adverse event were analyzed. The pooled data were reported as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CI; P < .05). Heterogeneity among the studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS The meta-analysis included 10 studies compromised of 30,300 patients. Based on our analysis, patients who were male, were older in age, underwent instrumented fusion, had diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, or benign prostatic hypertrophy had significantly higher risk of developing POUR. Additionally, patients in who developed POUR had significantly longer surgical times and higher volumes of intra-operative fluid administration, as compared with non-POUR patients. The POUR patients also had a significantly higher association with urinary tract infection. Prior surgery, BMI, length of stay, and smoking status did not reveal any statistical association with POUR. CONCLUSIONS Risk factors associated with POUR following LSS include male gender, older age, longer surgical times, fusion procedures, larger volumes of intraoperative infusions, and associated comorbidities like DM, CAD, and BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan A. Reed
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Alexander K. Mihas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Travis A. Fortin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Connor J. Donley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Guna Pratheep
- Department of Spine Surgery, Ganga Medical Center and Hospitals, Coimbatore, India
| | | | - Steven M. Theiss
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shi Y, Li F, Jiang X. The effect of multi-acupuncture point moxibustion combined with Chinese herbal medicine penetration on improving stool and urination after orthopedic surgery. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino) 2022; 68:503-506. [PMID: 35762090 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5985.22.03218-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Shi
- Department of Orthopedics, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, China
| | - Fengyan Li
- Department of Cardiology, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, China
| | - Xueqin Jiang
- Delivery Room, Yantai Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Yantai, China -
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Choi J, Kim JS, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Kim HJ, Deletis V, Park KS. Intraoperative bulbocavernosus reflex monitoring in posterior lumbar fusion surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 144:59-66. [PMID: 36274572 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2021] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the utility of intraoperative bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring in posterior lumbar fusion surgery. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 153 patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion with intraoperative BCR monitoring. Voiding function was assessed at discharge and two follow-ups. RESULTS BCR was preserved in 151 patients and completely disappeared in two patients at the end of surgery. For patients in whom BCR was preserved, voiding difficulties at discharge and 1-month and 6-month follow-ups were noted in 16 (10.6%), 9 (6.0%), and 0 (0.0%) patients, respectively. However, patients with BCR loss experienced voiding difficulties at all three time-points. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in voiding between those with preserved and disappeared BCRs at 6 months postoperatively. BCR disappeared during surgery but recovered before the end of surgery in six patients. Among these patients, one experienced transient voiding difficulties postoperatively but with good recovery. However, the other five patients did not experience postoperative voiding difficulties. CONCLUSIONS BCR had low sensitivity for voiding dysfunction at discharge, but had high accuracy at 6-month follow-up examinations. BCR loss was associated with new voiding dysfunction. SIGNIFICANCE Intraoperative BCR monitoring is a potentially useful tool for enhancing safety during posterior lumbar fusion by predicting postoperative voiding dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jongsuk Choi
- Department of Neurology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun-Soon Kim
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-Jae Hyun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Jeong Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho-Joong Kim
- Spine Center and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Vedran Deletis
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Dubrava, Zagreb, Croatia and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kyung Seok Park
- Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li H, Zhang W, Xu G, Wang D, Xu C, Zhang H, Zhang L, Li J, Tang P. Prophylactic tamsulosin can reduce the risk of urinary retention after surgery in male patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg 2022; 9:930707. [DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.930707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe meta-analysis aimed to estimate the efficacy of prophylactic tamsulosin on postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in male patients.MethodsPapers were searched in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases with predetermined keywords up to March 1, 2022. The studies reporting the preventive efficacy of prophylactic tamsulosin on POUR among men were identified. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated based on the random-effects model. Meta-regression was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity.ResultsThere were 11 studies with 1,046 patients in the tamsulosin group and 1,113 patients in the control group. The risk of POUR was significantly lower in the tamsulosin group (123/1,046 [11.8%] vs. 238/1,119 [19.0%]; RR = 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43 to 0.87; P = 0.006; heterogeneity: I2 = 57%; P = 0.009). Administration of tamsulosin was related to higher risk of adverse events (57/688 [8.3%] vs. 33/624 [5.3%]; RR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.13 to 2.48; P = 0.010; heterogeneity: I2 = 33%; P = 0.20). The level of evidence and mean age of the included patients were identified as the potential sources of heterogeneity.ConclusionThe present meta-analysis indicated that prophylactic tamsulosin helps in preventing POUR and younger patients might benefit more from this preventive regimen. Administrating tamsulosin was also associated with a possibly higher risk of adverse events.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hernandez NS, Wang AY, Kanter M, Olmos M, Ahsan T, Liu P, Balonov K, Riesenburger RI, Kryzanski J. Assessing the impact of spinal versus general anesthesia on postoperative urinary retention in elective spinal surgery patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022; 222:107454. [PMID: 36201900 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common and vexing complication in elective spine surgery. Efficacious prevention strategies are still lacking, and existing studies focus primarily on identifying risk factors. Spinal anesthesia has become an attractive alternative to general anesthesia in elective lumbar surgery, with the potential of having a differential impact on POUR. METHODS 422 spinal anesthesia procedures were prospectively collected between 2017 and 2021 and compared to 416 general anesthesia procedures retrospectively collected between 2014 and 2017, at a single academic center by the same senior neurosurgeon. The main outcome was POUR, defined as the need for straight bladder catheterization or indwelling bladder catheter placement after surgery due to failure to void. A power calculation was performed prior to data collection. RESULTS The general anesthesia group had a higher rate of POUR (9.1 %) compared with the spinal anesthesia group (4.3 %), p = 0.005. At baseline, the spinal anesthesia cohort had an older average age and fewer patients with a history of previous spine surgery. Other comorbid conditions were comparable between the groups. For perioperative characteristics, spinal anesthesia patients had higher ASA scores, shorter operative times, shorter lengths of hospital stay, less operative levels, and zero use of intraoperative bladder catheterization. Acute pain service consult was similar between the groups. A multivariable logistic regression revealed that spinal anesthesia was associated with a significantly lower rate of urinary retention in the spinal anesthesia group (p = 0.0130), after adjusting for potentially confounding factors. Other statistically significant risk factors for POUR included diabetes, (p = 0.003), BPH (p = 0.014), operative time (p = 4.94e-06), and ASA score (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS We collect and analyze one of the largest available cohorts of patients undergoing simple and complex surgeries under spinal and general anesthesia, finding that spinal anesthesia is independently associated with a lower incidence of POUR compared to general anesthesia, even when adjusted for potentially confounding risk factors. Further prospective trials are needed to explore this finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andy Y Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew Kanter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle Olmos
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tameem Ahsan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Penny Liu
- Department of Anesthesia, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - James Kryzanski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rughani A, Cushing D, Lary CW, Cox S, Jumper B, Johnson N, Florman J. Does tamsulosin decrease postoperative urinary retention in spine surgery? A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 2022; 137:1172-1179. [PMID: 35148516 DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.jns212393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors' objective was to determine whether preoperative administration of tamsulosin decreases postoperative urinary retention after spine surgery. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial performed at a single institution between 2016 and 2019, eligible males aged 50 to 85 years were administered tamsulosin or placebo for 5 days prior to elective spine surgery. Patients were excluded if they were taking alpha adrenergic blocking drugs; were allergic to tamsulosin, lactose, or sulfa drugs; had a preexisting indwelling urinary catheter, orthostatic hypotension, history of urological surgery, or renal failure; or were scheduled for cataract surgery within 2 weeks. Screening identified 1051 eligible patients (140 declined participation, 150 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 151 did not enroll for other reasons). A total of 610 patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.4 mg oral tamsulosin or an identical placebo capsule for 5 days preoperatively and 2 days postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 497 patients were included in the final statistical analysis. The overall rate of postoperative urinary retention was 9.7%, and tamsulosin had no observed effect on reducing the rate of postoperative urinary retention as compared with placebo (9.4% vs 9.9%, p = 0.96). There were no significant differences in the reported adverse events between groups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to model the effects of patient, surgical, and anesthetic factors on postoperative urinary retention, and the study drug remained an insignificant factor. CONCLUSIONS This study did not detect an effect of perioperative tamsulosin on reducing the rate of postoperative urinary retention in male patients aged 50 to 85 years who underwent elective spine surgery. This study does not support the routine use of tamsulosin to reduce postoperative urinary retention in patients without a previous prescription. It is unknown if subpopulations exist for which prophylactic tamsulosin may reduce postoperative urinary retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Rughani
- 1Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah Cushing
- 1Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine
| | - Christine W Lary
- 3Center for Outcomes Research and Education, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Portland, Maine
| | - Sara Cox
- 1Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine
| | - Brian Jumper
- 4Department of Urology, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine; and
| | - Nathaniel Johnson
- 5Department of Urology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Jeffrey Florman
- 1Neuroscience Institute, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Tufts University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brant JE, Smith S, Radoslovich SS, Wyland A, Walker JR, Lieberman EG, Yoo JU. Effects of delayed postoperative void and preoperative urologic symptoms on delay in time of discharge for elective lumbar decompression surgery. Spine J 2022; 22:810-818. [PMID: 34963631 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Almost half of all patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery have preoperative lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). These symptoms could affect postoperative voiding and subsequently length of stay. PURPOSE To investigate the association between preoperative LUTS and time to first void and between time to first void and time to discharge among patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data among patients at a single academic medical center. PATIENT SAMPLE All patients ≥18 years of age undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery between July 2017 and March 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES The physiologic measure of a delayed time to first void was defined as an initial postoperative void of > 4 hours after anesthesia stop time. The outcome of prolonged time to discharge was defined as a stay of >24 hours after anesthesia stop time. METHODS At their preoperative visit, patients completed the validated International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (range, 0-35 points), which is applicable for LUTS assessment in both sexes. Clinically relevant LUTS are defined as an IPSS score of ≥8. Patients were followed from their preoperative visit to surgery admission discharge. Association of LUTS with time to first void and time to first void with admission discharge were estimated using risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from a multivariable Poisson regression with a robust variance estimate adjusted for potential confounding variables including age, sex, IPSS, and intraoperative Foley catheter use. RESULTS The analytic cohort included 170 patients with an average age of 57 years and 103 (61%) were men. Preoperative LUTS prevalence was 45%, and 111 (65%) of patients voided within 4 hours after surgery. For patients with preoperative LUTS, the unadjusted RR for a first void of >4 hours was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.82-1.32) (p=.77). Adjustment for age, sex, intraoperative Foley catheter use, revision surgery, previous spine surgery, single versus multiple levels, and lumbar location did not materially alter the risk: the multivariable RR was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.82-1.31) (p=.74). The unadjusted RR for a discharge of > 24 hours for patients with a time to first void of > 4 hours was 2.17 (95% CI: 1.51-3.10) (p<.001). After adjusting for age, sex, intraoperative Foley catheter use, IPSS, revision surgery, previous spine surgery, single versus multiple levels, and lumbar location, the multivariable RR was 1.72 (95% CI: 1.22-2.41) (p=.002). CONCLUSIONS Regardless of preoperative LUTS status, an initial first void of >4 hours after surgery is associated with a longer time to discharge among patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression surgery. Future studies are needed to determine if encouraging early postoperative voiding results in timely discharge and shorter length of stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason E Brant
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 2360, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Spencer Smith
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 2360, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Stephanie S Radoslovich
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 2360, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Alden Wyland
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 2360, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jorge R Walker
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 2360, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Lieberman
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 2360, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jung U Yoo
- Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, Oregon Health & Science University, Sam Jackson Hall, Suite 2360, 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Porche K, Maciel CB, Lucke-Wold B, Robicsek SA, Chalouhi N, Brennan M, Busl KM. Preoperative prediction of postoperative urinary retention in lumbar surgery: a comparison of regression to multilayer neural network. J Neurosurg Spine 2022; 36:32-41. [PMID: 34507288 PMCID: PMC9608355 DOI: 10.3171/2021.3.spine21189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is a common complication after spine surgery and is associated with prolongation of hospital stay, increased hospital cost, increased rate of urinary tract infection, bladder overdistention, and autonomic dysregulation. POUR incidence following spine surgery ranges between 5.6% and 38%; no reliable prediction tool to identify those at higher risk is available, and that constitutes an important gap in the literature. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a preoperative risk model to predict the occurrence of POUR following routine elective spine surgery. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of consecutive adults who underwent lumbar spine surgery between June 1, 2017, and June 1, 2019. Patient characteristics, preexisting ICD-10 codes, preoperative pain and opioid use, preoperative alpha-1 blocker use, details of surgical planning, development of POUR, and management strategies were abstracted from electronic medical records. A binomial logistic model and a multilayer perceptron (MLP) were optimized using training and validation sets. The models' performance was then evaluated on model-naïve patients (not a part of either cohort). The models were then stacked to take advantage of each model's strengths and to avoid their weaknesses. Four additional models were developed from previously published models adjusted to include only relevant factors (i.e., factors known preoperatively and applied to the lumbar spine). RESULTS Overall, 891 patients were included in the cohort, with a mean of 59.6 ± 15.5 years of age, 52.7% male, BMI 30.4 ± 6.4, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2.8 ± 0.6, and a mean of 5.6 ± 5.7 comorbidities. The rate of POUR was found to be 25.9%. The two models were comparable, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.737 for the regression model and 0.735 for the neural network. By combining the two models, an AUC of 0.753 was achieved. With a regression model probability cutoff of 0.24 and a neural network cutoff of 0.23, maximal sensitivity and specificity were achieved, with specificity 68.2%, sensitivity 72.9%, negative predictive value 88.2%, and positive predictive value 43.4%. Both models individually outperformed previously published models (AUC 0.516-0.645) when applied to the current data set. CONCLUSIONS This predictive model can be a powerful preoperative tool in predicting patients who will be likely to develop POUR. By using a combination of regression and neural network modeling, good sensitivity, specificity, and NPV are achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Porche
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Carolina B. Maciel
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Brandon Lucke-Wold
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Steven A. Robicsek
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Nohra Chalouhi
- Lillian S. Wells Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Meghan Brennan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Katharina M. Busl
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cui P, Kong C, Wang P, Wang S, Lu S. The Potential Risk Factors for Prolonged Length of Stay Despite an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Elderly Patients Undergoing Short-Level Lumbar Fusion Surgery. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2022; 13:21514593221144179. [DOI: 10.1177/21514593221144179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify the risk factors associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS) despite an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in short-level lumbar fusion surgery. Methods We gathered data for all patients undergoing short-level lumbar fusion surgery from January to November 2021. Given the discharge criteria, a threshold was set according to mean LOS, and two groups were spontaneously formed: LOS shorter than the threshold for discharge (control group, n = 114) and LOS longer or equal to the threshold for discharge (delayed group, n = 72). Preoperative metrics were compared to identify risk factors associated with prolonged LOS. Results A total consecutive 186 patients with complete medical records were enrolled (77 males and 109 females; mean age 71.08 ± 5.70 years). After dichotomization according to the threshold for discharge, there were 114 patients in control group and 72 in delayed group. Statistical analysis demonstrated that age ≥75 years ( P = .002), female sex ( P < .001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade ≥ 3 ( P = .035), operation time ( P < .001), anesthesia time ( P < .001), ambulation time >1 day ( P = .027), removal of urinary catheter time >1 day ( P = .019), fusion levels ( P < .001), Clavien-Dindo grade > 1 ( P <.001) and allogeneic transfusion ( P = .009) were significantly related to prolonged LOS. Binary logistic regression revealed that age (odds ratio (OR) 5.149; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.045-12.966, P = .001), sex (OR 5.185, 95% CI 2.183-12.317, P < .001) and Clavien-Dindo grade > 1(OR 15.936, 95% CI 5.220-48.652, P < .001) were independent risk factors of prolonged LOS. Conclusions In this retrospective study, we analyzed the potential risk factors associated with delayed LOS despite implementing ERAS, further, binary logistic regression exhibited that age ≥75 years old, female sex and Clavien-Dindo grade >1 were independently correlated with prolonged LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Cui
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Kong
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Shuaikang Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Shibao Lu
- Department of Orthopedics, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tan CMP, Kaliya-Perumal AK, Ho GWK, Oh JYL. Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Thoracolumbosacral Spinal Fusion: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes. Cureus 2021; 13:e19724. [PMID: 34934587 PMCID: PMC8684364 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is an often-underestimated common complication following spine surgery, and it is essential to avoid its untoward long-term consequences. Besides, a dilemma exists regarding the appropriate timing for the postoperative removal of indwelling catheter (IDC). Hence, we aim to describe the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of POUR and also come up with recommendations for the removal of IDC. Methods Electronic records of patients who underwent elective thoracolumbosacral spinal fusion surgery from January 2017 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Excluded were those who underwent fusion for indications such as trauma, cauda equina syndrome, infection, and malignancy. Both surgery-related and patient-related risk factors were tabulated, and their association with the likely development of POUR was assessed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results One hundred sixty-eight patients (median age=64.1 years; 58.9% female) were included, with the incidence of POUR being 7.8%. Our findings suggest surgery-related factors, both intra- and postoperative, including operating time (p=0.008), anesthetic time (p=0.005), number of fusion levels (p<0.001), mobilization status prior to trial off catheter (TOC; p=0.021), and TOC timing (p=0.029) may have an association with POUR. In addition, patient-related factors, including the use of beta-blockers (p=0.020) and pre-operative mobility status (p<0.001), may also be associated with the likely development of POUR. Conclusion POUR seems to be a frequent complication following thoracolumbosacral spinal fusion surgery, which was found to have an association with some surgery-related and patient-related factors. While most of these factors are non-modifiable, certain modifiable risk factors provide the surgeon an opportunity to prevent POUR. Considering these factors, we recommend appropriate and timely mobilization of the patient prior to removal of IDC, which is to be performed preferably in the daytime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Glen Wen Kiat Ho
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, SGP
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention following elective spine surgery: a meta-analysis. Spine J 2021; 21:1802-1811. [PMID: 34015508 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Limited studies have investigated risk factors for postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following elective spine surgery. Furthermore, some discrepancies have been found in the results of existing observational studies. PURPOSE This study aimed to review the available literature on risk factors associated with POUR following elective spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. PATIENT SAMPLE A total of 31,251 patients (POUR=2,858, no POUR=28,393) were included in the meta-analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES Demographics, type of elective spine surgery, country, definition of POUR, and potential risk factors for POUR were evaluated. METHODS The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Binary outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR). Weighted mean differences (WMD) or standardized mean differences (SMD), with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were used for meta-analysis of continuous outcomes. RESULTS Eleven studies (2 prospective and 9 retrospective) were included in the analysis. Patients with POUR were older than those without POUR (WMD, 7.13; 95% CI, 4.50-9.76). Male patients were found to have an increased risk of POUR (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.64). The following variables were also identified as significant risk factors for POUR: benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; OR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.89-7.62), diabetes mellitus (DM; OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.17-1.93), and previous urinary tract infection (UTI; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.28-2.24). Moreover, longer operative time (WMD, 19.88; 95% CI, 5.01-34.75) and increased intraoperative fluid support (SMD, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.52) were observed in patients with POUR. In contrast, spine surgical procedures involving fewer levels (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65-0.86), and ambulation on the same day as surgery (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81) were associated with a decreased risk of POUR. CONCLUSIONS Based on our meta-analysis, older age, male gender, BPH, DM, and a history of UTI are risk factors for POUR following elective spine surgery. We also found that longer operative time and increased intravenous fluid support would increase the risk of POUR. Additionally, multi-level spine surgery may have a negative effect on postoperative voiding.
Collapse
Key Words
- CAD, coronary artery disease
- CI, confidence Interval
- DM, diabetes mellitus
- Elective surgery
- IAP, intra-abdominal pressure
- IQR, interquartile range
- Meta-analysis Abbreviations: BPH, benign prostatic hyperplasia
- OR, odds ratio
- POUR, postoperative urinary retention
- PVR, post-void residual
- Postoperative urinary retention
- Risk factor
- SD, standard deviation
- SMD, standardized mean differences
- Spine surgery
- Systematic review
- UTI, urinary tract infection
- WMD, weighted mean difference
Collapse
|
20
|
Yrjälä T, Helenius L, Taittonen M, Oksanen H, Keskinen H, Kolari T, Helenius I. Predictors of postoperative urinary retention after posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 30:3557-3562. [PMID: 34611717 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07016-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine predictors for postoperative urinary retention in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. Postoperative urinary retention affects almost every third adolescent after spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis. There are limited data regarding the risk factors of postoperative urinary retention in this patient group. METHODS A retrospective study with prospectively collected urinary retention data from paediatric spine register with 159 consecutive patients (114 females, mean age 15.6 years, range 10-21 years) undergoing pedicle screw instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at a university hospital between May 2010 and April 2020. Postoperative urinary retention was defined as an inability to void after catheter removal and documented residual over 300 mL as confirmed using an ultrasound or by catheterization. RESULTS Postoperative urinary retention was diagnosed in 33% (53 of 159) of the patients during hospital stay. Opioid amount on the day of catheter removal (OR 6.74 [95% CI: 2.47, 18.36], p < 0.001), male gender (OR 2.26 [95% CI: 1.01, 5.05], p = 0.048), and increasing weight (OR 1.04 [95% CI: 1.01, 1.07], p = 0.014) were associated with postoperative urinary retention. Mean opioid consumption on the day of catheter removal was 0.81 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.66, 0.96) in the retention group vs 0.57 mg/kg (95% CI: 0.51, 0.64) in the non-retention group, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS Higher total opioid consumption, opioid amount on the day of catheter removal, higher weight, and male gender increases the risk of postoperative urinary retention in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommi Yrjälä
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521, Turku, Finland.
| | - Linda Helenius
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521, Turku, Finland
| | - Markku Taittonen
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20521, Turku, Finland
| | - Hanna Oksanen
- Department of Paediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Heli Keskinen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Terhi Kolari
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Ilkka Helenius
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Efficacy of an opioid-sparing analgesic protocol in pain control after less invasive cranial neurosurgery. Pain Rep 2021; 6:e948. [PMID: 34368598 PMCID: PMC8341305 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
An opioid-sparing protocol for postoperative pain management in less invasive cranial neurosurgery significantly lowered opioid usage while reducing pain scores. Introduction: Opioid overuse in postoperative patients is a worrisome trend, and potential alternatives exist which warrant investigation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in treating postoperative cranial surgery pain has been hampered by concern for inadequate pain control and increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. A safe and effective alternative to opioid-based pain management is critical to improving postoperative care. Objective: The objective of this retrospective study was to determine whether an NSAID-based opioid-sparing pain management protocol (OSP) is effective in analgesic control of less invasive cranial surgery patients at 6-, 12-, and 24-hour postoperatively. Secondary aims included investigating differences in hemorrhagic complications. Methods: Five hundred sixty-six consecutive patients who underwent cranial surgery before and after implementation of the celecoxib-based OSP were eligible. Propensity score matching was used to match patients in each cohort. Results: The opioid-sparing cohort had lower pain scores at 6 hours (3.45 vs 4.19, P = 0.036), 12 hours (3.21 vs 4.00, P = 0.006), and 24 hours (2.90 vs 3.59, P = 0.010). Rates of postoperative hemorrhage were not significantly different (5% intervention vs 8% control, P = 0.527). The opioid-sparing pain management protocol provided comparable or better pain control in the first 24 hours after less invasive cranial surgery. Hemorrhage rates did not change with the use of an NSAID-based OSP. Conclusion: An effective alternative to the current standard opioid-based pain management is feasible for less invasive cranial surgery. Determinations of hemorrhage risk and more complex cranial surgery will require larger prospective randomized trials.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bowman JJ, Edwards CC, Dean C, Park J, Edwards CC. Incidence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention Following Lumbar Spine Fusion. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:E397-E402. [PMID: 34050045 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective cohort study (observational-retrospective chart review). OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine clinical rates and correlations of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in elective spine decompression and fusion procedures. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA POUR is a common postoperative complication that often has a major adverse impact on a patient's recovery from elective lumbar spine surgery. The etiology of POUR in most cases is unknown. Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery are considered to be at increased risk for POUR due to prone positioning during surgery and intraoperative cauda equina nerve root manipulation. Current studies reporting on POUR after elective spine surgery provide limited insight regarding risk factors and effective prevention strategies for this at-risk population. The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for POUR after elective lumbar spine surgery and strategies for reducing its incidence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two hundred consecutive patients aged 50 years or older undergoing combined lumbar decompression and fusion procedures over a 5-month period at a single institution were prospectively observed. Demographic and clinical data were prospectively recorded, including: medical history, surgical data, medications administered, complications, and postoperative hospital course. Factors correlating with POUR through a univariate analysis with P≤0.20 were considered for multivariate analysis. RESULTS POUR occurred in 19 of 200 patients. Those with POUR were more likely to be male (20% vs. 4%, odds ratio=6.2). Administration of scopolamine (P=0.02), neostigmine (P=0.01), and the total number of levels operated on (P=0.02) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of POUR. Length of surgery, surgical level, the performance of an interbody fusion did not have a bearing on the development of POUR (P>0.05). DISCUSSION We describe a single institution's experience of POUR incidence in 200 consecutive patients aged 50 years or older undergoing single or multilevel lumbar spine fusion procedures by 1 of 4 surgeons. Specific demographic and clinical risk factors were identified and a codified classification for POUR in a surgical population is presented.The results of this study will help clinicians appropriately counsel patients undergoing elective lumbar fusion about the potential development of POUR. The perioperative administration of scopolamine and neostigmine should be cautiously considered in men over 50 years of age due to the increased POUR risk. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative scopolamine and neostigmine administration in men over 50 should be avoided when possible to minimize the risk of POUR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
|
23
|
Leitner L, Wanivenhaus F, Bachmann LM, Liechti MD, Aguirre JA, Farshad M, Kessler TM. Bladder management in patients undergoing spine surgery: An assessment of care delivery. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2021; 6:100059. [PMID: 35141624 PMCID: PMC8820009 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower urinary tract dysfunction is common in the early postoperative phase after spine surgery. Although it is essential for an optimal patient management to balance benefits and harms, it is not known which patient benefit from a perioperative indwelling catheter. We therefore evaluated urological parameters prior and after spine surgery performing a quality assessment of our current clinical practice in bladder management. METHODS Preoperatively, all patients completed the International Prostate Symptom Score and were interviewed for urological history. Decision for preoperative urethral catheter placement was individually made by the responsible anesthesiologist according to an in-house protocol. Within and between group analyses using univariate and probability matching statistics were performed for patients with intraoperative urethral catheter-free management (n = 54) and those with a preoperatively placed catheter (n = 46). Post void residual (PVR) was measured prior and after surgery or after removal of the urethral catheter, respectively. The outcome measures consisted of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) and postoperative urological complications (PUC), defined as POUR and any catheter-related adverse events. RESULTS Hundred patients undergoing spine surgery were prospectively evaluated. Sixteen of the 54 (30%) patients with urethral catheter-free management developed POUR. Length of surgery and volume of intravenous infusion were associated with POUR (p < 0.05). In the 46 preoperatively catheterized patients, re-catheterization was required in 6 (13%). In a fairly homogenous subgroup of 72 patients with a probability of PUC between 15 and 40%, no significant association between intraoperative urethral catheter-free management and the occurrence of PUC was found (odds ratio 2.09, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 6.33; p = 0.193). CONCLUSIONS In case of postoperative PVR monitoring allowing de novo catheterization as appropriate, urethral catheter-free management seems to be a valuable option in spine surgery since it does not to increase PUC but minimizes unnecessary catheterizations with their related complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenz Leitner
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Florian Wanivenhaus
- Spine Division, Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Martina D. Liechti
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - José A. Aguirre
- Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Mazda Farshad
- Spine Division, Department of Orthopedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M. Kessler
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Sugiyama K, Harada N, Kondo K, Wada A, Takahashi H, Sugo N. Relationship between Preoperative Neuroradiological Findings and Intraoperative Bulbocavernosus Reflex Amplitude in Patients with Intradural Extramedullary Tumors. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2021; 61:484-491. [PMID: 34078828 PMCID: PMC8365236 DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The current study aimed to evaluate the relationship between preoperative neuroradiological findings and intraoperative bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) amplitude in patients with intradural extramedullary tumors. A total of 24 patients with lesions below the 12th thoracic vertebra were included in the analysis. Objective and subjective urinary symptoms were investigated using data obtained from medical records and the core lower urethral symptom score (CLSS) questionnaire. The lesion compression rate was evaluated with MRI. In the epiconus-to-conus medullaris (Epi-CM) group, BCR amplitude changes were found to be correlated with the compression rate (p <0.05). The preoperative CLSS of the group with a BCR amplitude of <50% was worse than that of the group with ≥50% (p <0.01). The group did not experience symptom improvement 6 months postoperatively based on the CLSS. The preoperative CLSS of the group with compression rate of ≥80% on imaging was worse than that of the group with <80% (p <0.05). In the group with preoperative compression rate of ≥80%, CLSS at 1 month and 6 months postoperatively was improved as compared to preoperative CLSS (p <0.01, p <0.05). Hence, BCR amplitude changes are associated with the degree of lesion compression on preoperative images and pre- and postoperative urinary symptoms. Patients with intradural extramedullary Epi-CM lesions with strong compression are likely to present with low BCR amplitude and worsened postoperative symptoms. It is considered that the risk of postoperative urinary symptoms increases even with careful surgical manipulation under these conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kunio Sugiyama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Naoyuki Harada
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University
| | - Kosuke Kondo
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University
| | - Akihito Wada
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toho University School of Medicine
| | - Hiroshi Takahashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Toho University School of Medicine
| | - Nobuo Sugo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine.,Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kerolus MG, Yerneni K, Witiw CD, Shelton A, Canar WJ, Daily D, Fontes RBV, Deutsch H, Fessler RG, Buvanendran A, O'Toole JE. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Decreases Length of Stay and Opioid Consumption. Neurosurgery 2021; 88:648-657. [PMID: 33469652 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid requirements in the perioperative period in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery remain problematic. Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques have been developed, there still remain substantial challenges to reducing length of hospital stay (LOS) because of postoperative opioid requirements. OBJECTIVE To study the effect of implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway in patients undergoing a 1-level MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) at our institution. METHODS We implemented an ERAS pathway in patients undergoing an elective single-level MIS TLIF for degenerative changes at a single institution. Consecutive patients were enrolled over a 20-mo period and compared with a pre-ERAS group prior to the implementation of the ERAS protocol. The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included reduction in morphine milligram equivalent units (MME), pain scores, postoperative urinary retention (POUR), and incidence of postoperative delirium. Patients were compared using the chi-square and Welch's 2-sample t-tests. RESULTS A total of 299 patients were evaluated in this study: 87 in the ERAS group and 212 in the pre-ERAS group. In the ERAS group, there was a significant reduction in LOS (3.13 ± 1.53 vs 3.71 ± 2.07 d, P = .019), total admission MME (252.74 ± 317.38 vs 455.91 ± 498.78 MME, P = .001), and the number of patients with POUR (48.3% vs 65.6%, P = .008). There were no differences in pain scores. CONCLUSION This is the largest ERAS MIS fusion cohort published to date evaluating a single cohort of patients in a generalizable manner. This ERAS pathway has shown a substantial decrease in LOS and opioid requirements in the immediate perioperative and postoperative period. There is further work to be done to evaluate patients undergoing other complex spine surgical interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mena G Kerolus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ketan Yerneni
- Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Christopher D Witiw
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Alena Shelton
- Rush University Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Deval Daily
- Rush University Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ricardo B V Fontes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Harel Deutsch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Richard G Fessler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - John E O'Toole
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Debono B, Wainwright TW, Wang MY, Sigmundsson FG, Yang MMH, Smid-Nanninga H, Bonnal A, Le Huec JC, Fawcett WJ, Ljungqvist O, Lonjon G, de Boer HD. Consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar spinal fusion: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Spine J 2021; 21:729-752. [PMID: 33444664 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) evidence-based protocols for perioperative care have led to improvements in outcomes in numerous surgical areas, through multimodal optimization of patient pathway, reduction of complications, improved patient experience and reduction in the length of stay. ERAS represent a relatively new paradigm in spine surgery. PURPOSE This multidisciplinary consensus review summarizes the literature and proposes recommendations for the perioperative care of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery with an ERAS program. STUDY DESIGN This is a review article. METHODS Under the impetus of the ERAS® society, a multidisciplinary guideline development group was constituted by bringing together international experts involved in the practice of ERAS and spine surgery. This group identified 22 ERAS items for lumbar fusion. A systematic search in the English language was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies were included, and the evidence was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Consensus recommendation was reached by the group after a critical appraisal of the literature. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-six articles were included to develop the consensus statements for 22 ERAS items; one ERAS item (prehabilitation) was excluded from the final summary due to very poor quality and conflicting evidence in lumbar spinal fusion. From these remaining 21 ERAS items, 28 recommendations were included. All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on the best available evidence. These included nine preoperative, eleven intraoperative, and six postoperative recommendations. They span topics from preoperative patient education and nutritional evaluation, intraoperative anesthetic and surgical techniques, and postoperative multimodal analgesic strategies. The level of evidence for the use of each recommendation is presented. CONCLUSION Based on the best evidence available for each ERAS item within the multidisciplinary perioperative care pathways, the ERAS® Society presents this comprehensive consensus review for perioperative care in lumbar fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bertrand Debono
- Paris-Versailles Spine Center (Centre Francilien du Dos), Paris, France; Ramsay Santé-Hôpital Privé de Versailles, Versailles, France.
| | - Thomas W Wainwright
- Research Institute, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK; The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Michael Y Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Freyr G Sigmundsson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Södra Grev Rosengatan, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Michael M H Yang
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Section of Neurosurgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Aurélien Bonnal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinique St-Jean- Sud de France, Santécité Group. St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier Metropole, France
| | - Jean-Charles Le Huec
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery - Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine, Bordeaux, France
| | - William J Fawcett
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- School of Medical Sciences, Department of Surgery, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Guillaume Lonjon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Orthosud, Clinique St-Jean- Sud de France, SantéCité Group. St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier Metropole, France
| | - Hans D de Boer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, Martini General Hospital Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Strickland AR, Usmani MF, Camacho JE, Sahai A, Bruckner JJ, Buraimoh K, Koh EY, Gelb DE, Ludwig SC. Evaluation of Risk Factors for Postoperative Urinary Retention in Elective Thoracolumbar Spinal Fusion Patients. Global Spine J 2021; 11:338-344. [PMID: 32875879 PMCID: PMC8013941 DOI: 10.1177/2192568220904681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case series. OBJECTIVES Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) represents a common postoperative complication of all elective surgeries. The aim of this study was to identify demographic, comorbid, and surgical factors risk factors for POUR in patients who underwent elective thoracolumbar spine fusion. METHODS Following institutional review board approval, patients who underwent elective primary or revision thoracic and lumbar instrumented spinal fusion in a 2-year period in tertiary and academic institution were reviewed. Sex, age, BMI, preoperative diagnosis, comorbid conditions, benign prostatic hyperplasia, diabetes, primary or revision surgery status, narcotic use, and operative factors were collected and analyzed between patients with and without POUR. RESULTS Of the 217 patients reviewed, 54 (24.9%) developed POUR. The average age for a patient with POUR was 67 ± 9, as opposed to 59 ± 10 for those without (P < .0001). Single-level fusions were associated with a 0% incidence of POUR, compared with 54.5% in 6 or more levels. The average hospital stay was increased by 1 day for those who had POUR (5.8 ± 3.3 vs 4.9 ± 3.9 days). There was no significant association with other demographic variables, comorbid conditions, or surgical factors. CONCLUSIONS POUR was a common complication in our patient cohort, with an incidence of 24.9%. Our findings demonstrate that patients who developed POUR are significantly older and have larger constructs. Patients who developed POUR also had longer in-hospital stays. Although our study supports other findings in the spine literature, more prospective data is needed to define diagnostic criteria of POUR as well as its management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jael E. Camacho
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amil Sahai
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Eugene Y. Koh
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Daniel E. Gelb
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Steven C. Ludwig
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Steven C. Ludwig, University of Maryland, Department of Orthopaedics, 110 South Paca Street, 6th Floor, Suite 300, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Licina A, Silvers A, Laughlin H, Russell J, Wan C. Pathway for enhanced recovery after spinal surgery-a systematic review of evidence for use of individual components. BMC Anesthesiol 2021; 21:74. [PMID: 33691620 PMCID: PMC7944908 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-021-01281-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Enhanced recovery in spinal surgery (ERSS) has shown promising improvements in clinical and economical outcomes. We have proposed an ERSS pathway based on available evidence. We aimed to delineate the clinical efficacy of individual pathway components in ERSS through a systematic narrative review. Methods We included systematic reviews and meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled studies, and observational studies in adults and pediatric patients evaluating any one of the 22 pre-defined components. Our primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, morbidity outcomes (e.g., pulmonary, cardiac, renal, surgical complications), patient-reported outcomes and experiences (e.g., pain, quality of care experience), and health services outcomes (e.g., length of stay and costs). Following databases (1990 onwards) were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL). Two authors screened the citations, full-text articles, and extracted data. A narrative synthesis was provided. We constructed Evidence Profile (EP) tables for each component of the pathway, where appropriate information was available. Due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, we did not conduct a meta-analyses. GRADE system was used to classify confidence in cumulative evidence for each component of the pathway. Results We identified 5423 relevant studies excluding duplicates as relating to the 22 pre-defined components of enhanced recovery in spinal surgery. We included 664 studies in the systematic review. We identified specific evidence within the context of spinal surgery for 14/22 proposed components. Evidence was summarized in EP tables where suitable. We performed thematic synthesis without EP for 6/22 elements. We identified appropriate societal guidelines for the remainder of the components. Conclusions We identified the following components with high quality of evidence as per GRADE system: pre-emptive analgesia, peri-operative blood conservation (antifibrinolytic use), surgical site preparation and antibiotic prophylaxis. There was moderate level of evidence for implementation of prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery, multimodal perioperative analgesia, intravenous lignocaine and ketamine use as well as early mobilization. This review allows for the first formalized evidence-based unified protocol in the field of ERSS. Further studies validating the multimodal ERSS framework are essential to guide the future evolution of care in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01281-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Licina
- Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia.
| | - Andrew Silvers
- Monash Health, Clayton, Australia, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Jeremy Russell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Crispin Wan
- Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pertsch NJ, Darveau SC, Tang OY, Toms SA, Weil RJ. Urinary Tract Infection after Elective Spine Surgery: Timing, Predictive Factors, and Outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:337-346. [PMID: 33534444 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors associated with the timing of urinary tract infection (UTI) after elective spine surgery, and to determine whether postoperative UTI timing affects short-term outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common post-surgical complication; however, the predominant timing, location, and potential differential effects have not been carefully studied. METHODS We analyzed elective spine surgery patients from 2012 to 2018 in the ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). We grouped patients with postoperative UTI by day of onset relative to discharge, to create cohorts of patients who developed inpatient UTI and post-discharge UTI. We compared both UTI cohorts with a control (no UTI) population and with each other to identify differences in baseline characteristics including demographic, comorbidity and operative factors. We performed multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of UTI in each cohort and to assess adjusted risks of poor outcomes associated with UTI timing. RESULTS A total of 289,121 patients met inclusion criteria and 0.88% developed UTI (n = 2553). Only 31.6% of UTIs occurred before discharge (n = 806), with 68.4% occurring after discharge (n = 1747). The inpatient UTI cohort had significantly longer operative time, more fusion procedures, more posterior procedures, and more procedures involving the lumbar levels than the post-discharge cohort. Predictors of inpatient UTI included procedure type, spine region, and approach. Predictors of post-discharge UTI included length-of-stay and discharge destination. Both UTI cohorts were significantly associated with sepsis; however, post-discharge UTI carried a higher odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 24.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 21.05-29.45, P < 0.001 vs. aOR = 14.31, 95% CI = 11.09-18.45, P < 0.001). Inpatient UTI was not associated with 30-day readmission, although post-discharge UTI was (aOR = 8.23, 95% CI = 7.36-9.20, P < 0.001). Conversely, inpatient UTI was associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality (aOR = 3.23, 95% CI = 1.62-6.41, P = 0.001), but post-discharge UTI was not. CONCLUSION Predictive factors and outcomes differ based on timing of UTI after elective spine surgery. Before discharge, procedure -specific details predict UTI, but after discharge they do not. These findings suggest that traditional thinking about UTI prevention may need modification.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan J Pertsch
- The Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Spencer C Darveau
- The Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Oliver Y Tang
- The Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Steven A Toms
- The Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| | - Robert J Weil
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ahmadi Amoli H, Vaghef Davari F, Rahmanian B, Sharifi A, Shariat Moharari R, Rahimpour E, Rahmanian M, Gooran S. Prophylactic postoperative condom sheet placement: A randomized clinical trial to test a new concept. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 62:415-418. [PMID: 33552504 PMCID: PMC7858678 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is one of the most common complications after surgery with several risk factors. However, its precise etiology is not completely understood. So far, the effect of prophylactic condom sheet placement on the prevention of POUR has not been addressed. This study was designed to understand whether preventive condom sheet decreases the rate of POUR. Materials and methods This randomized clinical trial was carried out in an educational hospital during 2018-2019. All male patients, who underwent anorectal surgery with spinal anesthesia, were included and randomly allocated into two groups (with and without postoperative condom sheet placement). Results A total of 172 patients were included in this study (86 patients per group). Twenty-three (13.4%) patients developed POUR. The incidence of POUR was 15.1% among patients with condom sheets and 11.6% in patients without condom sheets, which was not significantly different (P > 0.5). POUR development had a significant correlation with the use of morphine and history of hypertension in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion Based on the present results, it seems that condom sheet placement did not effectively prevent POUR in patients; therefore, ambulation of patients after surgery is a more effective strategy for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Farzad Vaghef Davari
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Amirsina Sharifi
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Ehsan Rahimpour
- Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Shahram Gooran
- Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Risk Factors Associated With Development of Urinary Retention Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion: Special Attention to the Use of Glycopyrrolate in Anesthesia Reversal. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:E133-E138. [PMID: 32890297 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN The study is designed as a retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors of postoperative urinary retention in spine surgery patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Postoperative urinary retention is a common complication in patients undergoing operative procedures requiring anesthesia. Current studies have shown significant risk factors for postoperative urinary retention, but most are nonmodifiable and subsequently of limited usefulness in preventing this complication. Several new studies have shown possible modifiable risk factors, but current data are inconsistent in terms of their statistical significance. METHODS A total of 814 consecutive patients who underwent open posterior lumbar laminectomy and fusion were included in the retrospective cohort study. Pre, intra-, and postoperative characteristics were collected in all patients to identify risk factors for postoperative urinary retention. RESULTS Glycopyrrolate use (odds ratio [OR] 2.60; P = 0.001), decreased body mass index (OR 0.96; P = 0.018), previous diagnosis of benign prostate hyperplasia (OR 3.34; P ≤ 0.001), and postoperative urinary tract infection (OR 5.60, P = 0.005) were associated with postoperative urinary retention. Previous history of lumbar spine surgery (OR 0.55; P = 0.019) was associated with decreased rates of postoperative urinary retention. CONCLUSION Glycopyrrolate use, benign prostate hyperplasia, and postoperative urinary tract infection were independent risk factors for postoperative urinary retention. The use of glycopyrrolate is a potentially modifiable risk factor for postoperative urinary retention.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
|
32
|
Kopel J, Sharma DP. Spinal surgery and urinary retention: A review of the literature. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1177/2051415820916932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective: Postoperative urinary retention is a common complication for patients recovering from general anesthesia or invasive surgery near the spinal column. However, no study has systematically reviewed the incidence of postoperative urinary retention for spinal surgeries performed at the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spinal regions. In this review, we critically analyze and summarize the known literature on the incidence and risk factors associated with postoperative urinary retention after spinal surgery. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed at the end of September 2019 within the PubMed database. Results: The average incidence of postoperative urinary retention from nine of the 10 studies was 17.2% with one paper that did not report on postoperative urinary retention incidence. Furthermore, age, male gender, location and history of spinal surgery, duration of surgery, benign prostatic hypertrophy, and Foley catheter were reported as major risk factors for postoperative urinary retention and spinal surgery. Conclusion: Overall, spinal cord and postoperative urinary retention remains a poorly understood area requiring further investigation into the incidence, risk factors, and surgical methods influence postoperative urinary retention and post-operative outcomes. We believe an overview of such data can help revise guidelines for the management of postoperative urinary retention and raise awareness of its prevalence in elderly patients undergoing spinal surgery. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kopel
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, United States of America
| | - Dr Pranav Sharma
- Staff Physician, Department of Urology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ifrach J, Basu R, Joshi DS, Flanders TM, Ozturk AK, Malhotra NR, Pessoa R, Kallan MJ, Maloney E, Welch WC, Ali ZS. Efficacy of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathway in Elderly Patients Undergoing Spine and Peripheral Nerve Surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 197:106115. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 07/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
34
|
Incidence of and risk factors for postoperative urinary retention in men after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2020; 72:943-950. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
35
|
Doherty RJ, Wahood W, Yolcu YU, Zreik J, Goyal A, Gazelka HM, Habermann EB, Sebastian A, Bydon M. Chronic opioid use is associated with increased postoperative urinary retention, length of stay and non-routine discharge following lumbar fusion surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 197:106161. [PMID: 32854090 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of chronic opioid use (COU) is increasing with health related complications impacting both patients and healthcare services. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify the impact of COU on postoperative urinary retention (PUR) in patients following lumbar fusion surgery as well as its impact on length of stay (LOS) and non-routine discharges (NRD). MATERIALS & METHODS The State Inpatient Databases were utilised to identify patients undergoing elective lumbar fusion procedures. Patients with and without COU were separated into groups and matched using 3:1 propensity score matching. PUR, LOS in the upper quartile and discharge to a location other than home were the outcomes of interest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the impact of COU on the above outcomes and Wald chi-square tests were used to determine the factors with the most significant associations. RESULTS COU was significant for PUR (p = 0.037), prolonged LOS (p < 0.001), and NRD (p < 0.001). Factors most significantly associated with PUR were Elixhauser Mortality Index and COU both with p < 0.05. Factors associated with prolonged LOS and NRD were Elixhauser Mortality Index, COU, and insurance status. CONCLUSION COU has a notable impact on PUR, LOS, and NRD. The Elixhauser Mortality Index and insurance status of patients also showed predictive utility for these outcomes. This knowledge enables us to identify sources of pressure for health services and approach them strategically through increased awareness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronan J Doherty
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Waseem Wahood
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA
| | - Yagiz U Yolcu
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jad Zreik
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Anshit Goyal
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Halena M Gazelka
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Elizabeth B Habermann
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery Surgical Outcomes Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Arjun Sebastian
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Neuro-Informatics Laboratory, Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Karani R, Mahdy A, Asghar F. Postoperative Urinary Retention in Patients Who Undergo Joint Arthroplasty or Spine Surgery. JBJS Rev 2020; 8:e18.00040. [PMID: 32759614 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.18.00040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) may result from orthopaedic procedures and potentially lead to bacteremia and chronic voiding difficulties.
Risk factors for POUR include age, undergoing joint arthroplasty, male sex, intraoperative intravenous fluid administration, operative time, and history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Indwelling catheterization is the preferred management strategy for patients at risk for developing POUR. A consistent definition of POUR is needed in order to draw conclusions from future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv Karani
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Ayman Mahdy
- Departments of Urology (A.M.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (F.A.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Ferhan Asghar
- Departments of Urology (A.M.) and Orthopaedic Surgery (F.A.), University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Knight BA, Bayne AP, Zusman N, Barney N, Yang S. Postoperative management factors affect urinary retention following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 2020; 8:703-709. [PMID: 32077085 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00090-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES This study investigates postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and the effects of postoperative analgesia and mobility on retention. High opioid use and decreased postoperative mobility are proposed risk factors for retention in adults. There is a paucity of literature on POUR in the adolescent population undergoing surgery for AIS. The impact of pain control and mobility on POUR in these patients is unknown. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adolescents (11-18 years) undergoing elective PSF for AIS at a single institution (2012-2018). POUR was defined as the inability to void > 8 h after catheter removal. Possible risk factors for retention including opioid usage and ambulatory status at the time of catheter removal were assessed on univariate and binomial logistic regression analyses. RESULTS One hundred and thirty-six patients were included, with 21 (15.4%) experiencing POUR. On the day of catheter removal, 24 patients had not attempted ambulation; these patients had 2.5 times higher rate of POUR than those who were walking (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.04). Patients who developed retention ambulated a mean threefold shorter distance than those without POUR (45 vs. 136 feet, p = 0.04). On binomial logistic regression, decreased ambulation distance was associated with retention (p = 0.038). While opioid use was not significant on univariate analysis, higher opioid use on the day of catheter removal predicted retention on logistic regression (p = 0.001). POUR resolved in all patients (median duration 0.5 days, range 0-12 days). CONCLUSIONS The development of POUR after PSF for AIS affects one in six patients but resolves quickly. Non-ambulatory patients and patients who received large doses of opioids on the day of catheter removal were more likely to develop POUR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Alexander Knight
- Department of Urology, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Aaron P Bayne
- Department of Urology, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Natalie Zusman
- Department of Orthopaedics, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code CDW6, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Nicole Barney
- Department of Orthopaedics, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code CDW6, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Scott Yang
- Department of Orthopaedics, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code CDW6, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ongaigui C, Fiorda-Diaz J, Dada O, Mavarez-Martinez A, Echeverria-Villalobos M, Bergese SD. Intraoperative Fluid Management in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review. Front Surg 2020; 7:45. [PMID: 32850944 PMCID: PMC7403195 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.00045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluid management has been widely recognized as an important component of the perioperative care in patients undergoing major procedures including spine surgeries. Patient- and surgery-related factors such as age, length of the surgery, massive intraoperative blood loss, and prone positioning, may impact the intraoperative administration of fluids. In addition, the type of fluid administered may also affect post-operative outcomes. Published literature describing intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing major spine surgeries is limited and remains controversial. Therefore, we reviewed current literature on intraoperative fluid management and its association with post-operative complications in spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinna Ongaigui
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Juan Fiorda-Diaz
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Olufunke Dada
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Ana Mavarez-Martinez
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, NY, United States
| | | | - Sergio D Bergese
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
Background
Early ambulation after total hip arthroplasty predicts early discharge. Spinal anesthesia is preferred by many practices but can delay ambulation, especially with bupivacaine. Mepivacaine, an intermediate-acting local anesthetic, could enable earlier ambulation than bupivacaine. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that patients who received mepivacaine would ambulate earlier than those who received hyperbaric or isobaric bupivacaine for primary total hip arthroplasty.
Methods
This randomized controlled trial included American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I to III patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. The patients were randomized 1:1:1 to 52.5 mg of mepivacaine, 11.25 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine, or 12.5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was ambulation between 3 and 3.5 h. Secondary outcomes included return of motor and sensory function, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, transient neurologic symptoms, urinary retention, intraoperative hypotension, intraoperative muscle tension, same-day discharge, length of stay, and 30-day readmissions.
Results
Of 154 patients, 50 received mepivacaine, 53 received hyperbaric bupivacaine, and 51 received isobaric bupivacaine. Patient characteristics were similar among groups. For ambulation at 3 to 3.5 h, 35 of 50 (70.0%) of patients met this endpoint in the mepivacaine group, followed by 20 of 53 (37.7%) in the hyperbaric bupivacaine group, and 9 of 51 (17.6%) in the isobaric bupivacaine group (P < 0.001). Return of motor function occurred earlier with mepivacaine. Pain and opioid consumption were higher for mepivacaine patients in the early postoperative period only. For ambulatory status, 23 of 50 (46.0%) of mepivacaine, 13 of 53 (24.5%) of hyperbaric bupivacaine, and 11 of 51 (21.5%) of isobaric bupivacaine patients had same-day discharge (P = 0.014). Length of stay was shortest in mepivacaine patients. There were no differences in transient neurologic symptoms, urinary retention, hypotension, muscle tension, or dizziness.
Conclusions
Mepivacaine patients ambulated earlier and were more likely to be discharged the same day than both hyperbaric bupivacaine and isobaric bupivacaine patients. Mepivacaine could be beneficial for outpatient total hip arthroplasty candidates if spinal is the preferred anesthesia type.
Editor’s Perspective
What We Already Know about This Topic
What This Article Tells Us That Is New
Collapse
|
40
|
Does minimally invasive spine surgery reduce the rate of perioperative medical complications? A retrospective single-center experience of 1435 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2020; 30:122-127. [PMID: 32700125 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06536-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE It is unclear if minimally invasive techniques reduce the rate of perioperative complications when compared to traditional open approaches to the lumbar spine. Our aim was to evaluate perioperative complications in patients that underwent MIS and conventional open techniques for degenerative lumbar pathology. METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database identified 1435 patients that underwent surgery for degenerative lumbar pathology from January 2013-2016. We evaluated the rates of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia. Groups were analyzed based on decompression alone as compared with decompression and fusion for both MIS and traditional open techniques. RESULTS Patients that underwent traditional open lumbar decompression surgery were more likely to develop a DVT (P = .01) than those undergoing MIS decompression. There was no significant difference in rates of PE (P = .99), UTI (P = .24), or pneumonia (P = .56). Patients that underwent traditional open lumbar fusion surgery compared to MIS fusion were also more likely to have a PE (P = .03). There was no significant difference in rates of DVT (P = .22), UTI (P = .43), or pneumonia (P = .24). CONCLUSION Minimally invasive spinal surgery was found to reduce the rate of DVT for decompression surgeries and reduce the rate of PE for fusion surgeries.
Collapse
|
41
|
Elderly as a Predictor for Perioperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Multilevel Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Regression Modeling Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020; 45:735-740. [PMID: 31860630 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a single-institute retrospective study. OBJECTIVE To describe perioperative and postoperative complications in elderly who underwent multilevel minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) while identifying predictors of complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The number of elderly patients undergoing spinal fusion is rising. Spinal surgery in the elderly is considered high risk with high rates of complications. Perioperative and postoperative complications in elderly undergoing multilevel MIS TLIF is, however, not known. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on 467 consecutive patients who underwent multilevel MIS TLIF at a single institution from 2013 to 2017. Two cohorts, 70 years or older and 50 to 69 years old were analyzed. Multiple logistic regressions with minor and major complication rates as the dependent variables were performed to identify predictors of complication based on previously cited risk factors. A p-value of 0.008 or less was considered significant. RESULTS One hundred fifty-two elderly and 315 nonelderly patients underwent multilevel MIS TLIFs. The average age was 76.4 and 60.4 years for the elderly and nonelderly cohorts. We observed 13 major (8.44%) and 72 minor (47.4%) complications in the elderly. No difference was noted in complication rates between the cohorts, except for urinary tract infection (P = .004) and urinary retention (P = .014). There were no myocardial infarctions; hardware complications; visceral, vascular, and neural injuries; or death. Length of stay, comorbidity, and length of surgery were predictive of major and minor complications. CONCLUSION Elderly may undergo multilevel MIS TLIF with comparable complication rates. Age was not a predictor of complications. Rather, attention should focus on evaluation of comorbidity and limiting operative times. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
|
42
|
Cremins M, Vellanky S, McCann G, Mancini M, Sanzari L, Yannopoulos A. Considering healthcare value and associated risk factors with postoperative urinary retention after elective laminectomy. Spine J 2020; 20:701-707. [PMID: 32006710 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2019] [Revised: 01/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mitigating common complications such as postoperative urinary retention (POUR) following elective spine surgery is prudent. Identifying patients at risk for POUR and recognizing associated factors, to avoid a more complicated postoperative episode should be a priority and easily achievable. Understanding the financial burden of complications, such as POUR, is also important for value-based healthcare, not only for providers, but for employers and payors as well. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to examine patient and surgical factors that may lead to increased risk for POUR and its associated cost following elective lumbar laminectomies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This is a retrospective study of the incidence of postoperative urinary retention after elective one- and two-level primary lumbar laminectomies. PATIENT SAMPLE We followed patients undergoing one- and two-level primary elective lumbar laminectomies performed between April 2014 and December 2016. OUTCOME MEASURES Patient factors included age, gender, body-mass index, and comorbidities. Surgical factors included surgical time, intraoperative fluid volume requirements, anesthesia type, and surgical levels involved. Other outcome variables included length of stay, discharge disposition, 30-day all-cause readmissions and emergency department visits, 90-day complications, and variable direct costs. METHODS The incidence of POUR was evaluated and compared with patient and surgical factors and cost-specific variables to identify correlations and potential risk for POUR after one- and two-level primary lumbar laminectomies. RESULTS Analysis included 333 patients - 203 one-level laminectomies and 130 two-level laminectomies. The overall incidence of POUR was 17.4%. Age, male gender, and history of urinary retention were significantly associated with POUR. There was a significantly increased risk of POUR with increased surgical time, but not with anesthesia type. There were also no significant differences in body-mass index, other study comorbidities, intraoperative fluid requirements, readmission, emergency department visit, and complication rates between groups. On average, patients with POUR had a significantly longer length of stay than patients without POUR. In addition, more POUR patients were discharged to acute rehabilitation facilities and had higher average variable direct cost compared tonon-POUR patients. CONCLUSIONS POUR is a significant risk after elective laminectomy. This study supports several widely accepted beliefs regarding POUR risk, while challenging others. It also highlights the burden of POUR development after surgery. At our institution, we developed a protocol supported by these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Cremins
- Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Rd, North Haven, CT 06473, USA
| | - Smitha Vellanky
- Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Rd, North Haven, CT 06473, USA
| | - Grace McCann
- Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Rd, North Haven, CT 06473, USA.
| | - Michael Mancini
- Spine Institute of Connecticut, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, 114 Woodland St, Hartford, CT 06105, USA
| | - Laura Sanzari
- Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, 370 Bassett Rd, North Haven, CT 06473, USA
| | - Aris Yannopoulos
- Musculoskeletal Outcomes Institute, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, 114 Woodland St, Hartford, CT 06105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Narain AS, Parrish JM, Jenkins NW, Haws BE, Khechen B, Yom KH, Kudaravalli KT, Guntin JA, Singh K. Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications After Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:125-132. [PMID: 32355616 DOI: 10.14444/7018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The prevention of perioperative and postoperative complications is necessary to avoid poor postoperative outcomes and increased costs. Previous investigations have identified risk factors for complications after various spine procedures, but no such study exists in a population solely undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). The purpose of this study is to determine risk factors for the development of complications up to 2 years after MIS TLIF procedures. Methods Patients who underwent primary, single-level MIS TLIF from 2007 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of medical and surgical complications up to 2 years postoperatively was determined. Patients were categorized according to demographic, comorbidity, and procedural characteristics. Bivariate Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to determine if an association existed between patient characteristics and complication incidence. A final multivariate model including all patient characteristics as controls was created using backwards, stepwise regression until only those variables with P < .05 remained. Results 390 patients were analyzed. Upon bivariate analysis, age >50 years (P = .025), diabetes mellitus (P = .001), and operative duration >105 minutes (P = .016) were associated with increased medical complication rates. Regarding surgical complications, age ≤50 years (P < .001), obesity (P = .012), and diabetes mellitus (P = .042) were identified as risk factors on bivariate analysis. Upon final multivariate analysis, operative time >105 minutes (P = .009) and diabetes mellitus (P = .001) were independent risk factors for medical complications. Independent risk factors for surgical complications on multivariate analysis included age ≤50 years (P < .001), diabetes mellitus (P = .002), and obesity (P = .030). Conclusions Diabetic patients and those who underwent longer operations were at increased risk of medical complications, while younger patients, obese patients and those also with diabetes mellitus were at increased risk of surgical complications up to 2 years after MIS TLIF. Practitioners can use this information to identify patients who require preventative care before their procedure or increased postoperative vigilance and monitoring after single-level MIS TLIF. Level of Evidence 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur S Narain
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - James M Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nathaniel W Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brittany E Haws
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Benjamin Khechen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kelly H Yom
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Krishna T Kudaravalli
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jordan A Guntin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Local anesthetic with sedation is a viable alternative to general anesthesia for lumbar spinal decompressions: A retrospective cohort feasibility study and short-term analysis of outcomes. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1097/bco.0000000000000855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
45
|
BİRİCİK E, GÜNEŞ Y. Nörocerrahi ve Eras (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery). ARŞIV KAYNAK TARAMA DERGISI 2020. [DOI: 10.17827/aktd.604717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
46
|
Mesfin FB, Hoang S, Ortiz Torres M, Ngnitewe Massa'a R, Castillo R. Retrospective Data Analysis and Literature Review for a Development of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Cureus 2020; 12:e6930. [PMID: 32190483 PMCID: PMC7067352 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective While enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are associated with shorter length of stay and improved outcomes in multiple surgical specialties, its application to spine surgery has been limited. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common spinal procedure with a relative efficacy and safety profile that makes it suitable for the application of ERAS principles. Reviewing our outcomes and practice and incorporating evidence-based clinical studies, we propose the development of an ERAS pathway for ACDF. Methods This is a retrospective review of ACDF cases performed at a single institution by a single surgeon from 2014 to 2017. Primary outcome measures included length of stay, complications, and 30-day readmission rates. The 1- and 2-level and the 3- and 4-level groups were also each consolidated into a single cohort for comparison. A comprehensive review of evidence-based literature pertaining to ACDF was then performed. Best-practice recommendations derived from the literature were incorporated into the proposed ERAS protocol. Results In this series of 75 1-level, 77 2-level, 44 3-level and 20 4-level ACDF procedures, the average surgical time (minutes) was 68, 90, 118 and 141; length of stay (days) was 1, 1, 1.4, and 1.7; drain usage (%) was 1.3, 2.6, 13.6 and 10; and 30-day readmission rates (%) were 2.7, 3.9, 4.5, and 15, respectively. Combining the 1- and 2-level as a single group and 3- and 4-level as another cohort, the 3- and 4-level cohort had a significantly higher rate of drain usage and estimated blood loss (EBL) but there was not a difference in length-of-stay, complications or 30-day readmission rates. Conclusions Given the relative equivalent safety profile between 1- and 2-level as compared to 3- and 4-level ACDF, the proposed ERAS pathway can be applied to all patients, and not just restricted to 1-level or 2-level ACDF. Taking into account feasibility parameters as deduced from a review of institutional outcomes, this pathway can streamline same-day discharge and improve the patient experience. Its success will be predicated on an iterative improvement process deriving from optimal prospective outcome measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stanley Hoang
- Neurosurgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| | | | | | - Raul Castillo
- Anesthesiology, University of Missouri Health Care and University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zakaria HM, Lipphardt M, Bazydlo M, Xiao S, Schultz L, Chedid M, Abdulhak M, Schwalb JM, Nerenz D, Easton R, Chang V. The Preoperative Risks and Two-Year Sequelae of Postoperative Urinary Retention: Analysis of the Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MSSIC). World Neurosurg 2020; 133:e619-e626. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
48
|
Inui T, Inokuchi K, Watanabe Y, Matsui K, Nakayama Y, Ishii K, Suzuki T, Kurozumi T, Kawano H. Comparison of the operative time for open door laminoplasty using titanium plate spacers or hydroxyapatite block spacers: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14:475. [PMID: 31888719 PMCID: PMC6936073 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1539-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Background Titanium plate (TP) and hydroxyapatite (HA) spacers are widely used during open-door laminoplasty, performed with the patient in a prone position. Reducing operative time is an important consideration, particularly to reduce the risk of postoperative complications in older patients. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to compare the operative time for open-door laminoplasty using TP or HA spacers. Methods Consecutive patients with a spinal cord injury, without bone injury, and ≥ 50 years of age were included. Multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the operative time between patients in the TP and HA group, adjusting for known factors that can influence surgical and postoperative outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to confirm the robustness of the primary outcome. The cumulative incidence of postoperative complications over 1-year after surgery was also compared. Results Of the 164 patients forming our study group, TP spacers were used in 62 and HA in 102. Operative time was significantly shorter for the TP (128 min) than HA (158 min) group (p < 0.001). Both multivariate and propensity score matching analyses confirmed a significant reduction in operative time for the TP, compared to HA, group (regression coefficient, − 30 min and − 38 min, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions The use of TP spacers reduced the operative time for cervical open-door laminoplasty by about 30 min, compared to the use of HA spacers, with no difference in the rate of postoperative complications.
Collapse
|
49
|
Sheha ED, Derman PB. Complication avoidance and management in ambulatory spine surgery. JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY 2019; 5:S181-S190. [PMID: 31656873 DOI: 10.21037/jss.2019.08.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The positive safety profile and potential cost savings associated with ambulatory spine surgery have resulted in an increasing number of spine procedures being performed on an outpatient basis. As indications become more inclusive and the variety and volume of ambulatory procedures grow, the incidence of complications may rise. Limiting adverse events in the outpatient setting starts with patient selection. Surgeons should be aware of the potential complications and associated risk factors for common ambulatory spine procedures and employ strategies to limit and appropriately manage them. Protocols which include patient education, multimodal anesthesia and analgesia, standardized post-operative monitoring, and safe discharge planning are also essential for maximizing safety in the ambulatory setting.
Collapse
|
50
|
Nevo A, Haidar AM, Navaratnam A, Humphreys M. Urinary Retention Following Non-urologic Surgery. CURRENT BLADDER DYSFUNCTION REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11884-019-00518-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|