Painless motor radiculopathy of the cervical spine: clinical and radiological characteristics and long-term outcomes after operative decompression

Integrating jigsaw puzzle thinking into practice: the assessment of cervical spine radiculopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cervical spine radiculopathy (CSR) presents a complex socioeconomic problem for patients, clinicians, families, employers and healthcare systems. Due to the heterogeneity of clinical presentation and underlying mechanisms, clinical assessment can be challenging. This review will examine the literature on the underlying pathophysiology and studies investigating the holistic assessment strategies for this disabling condition. The authors will focus particular attention on the psychological factors associated with CSR and the physical and imaging strategies to establish a diagnosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Contemporary CSR assessment should identify the underlying pathomechanisms and how this may impact the somatosensory nervous system integrity and function. No physical assessment test in isolation will establish CSR diagnosis; therefore, clinicians should utilise a cluster of tests and recognise the potential limitations as part of a clinical reasoning framework. The assessment of the somatosensory nervous system can provide insights into particular subgroups of CSR presentation, which may provide interesting opportunities to continue to enhance individualised assessment and management strategies for CSR. The interplay between psychological factors can influence the diagnosis and recovery times for a person with CSR, and clinicians should continue to explore how these factors may influence a person's prognosis. The authors will discuss the opportunities for future research and limitations of contemporary approaches to assessment, underpinned by evidence, and how this supports a clinical assessment to establish CSR diagnosis.

SUMMARY

Research should continue to investigate how clinicians assess the interplay between physical and psychological factors to inform the establishment of CSR. Specifically, there is a need to investigate the validity and reliability of combining somatosensory, motor and imaging assessment findings to reach a diagnosis and inform onward management plans.

Neurological outcomes after surgery and postoperative rehabilitation for cervical radiculopathy due to disc disease: a 2-year-follow-up of a randomized clinical trial

Reports on neurological outcomes in patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR) undergoing surgery and postoperative rehabilitation are important to inform prognosis. This 2-year-follow-up of a randomized clinical trial aimed to compare secondary neurological outcomes between structured postoperative rehabilitation and a standard approach after surgery for CR. A secondary aim was to increase knowledge about recovery of neurological impairments in relation to patient-reported neck disability. Neurological outcomes included assessment of sensibility, motor function, arm reflexes and the Spurling test. A total of 153 and 135 participants (> 70% response rate) completed the clinical examination. Between-group differences, changes over time, and associations between persistent neurological impairments and the Neck Disability Index were investigated. No between-group differences were reported (p > 0.07), and neurological impairments in sensibility, motor function, and a positive Spurling test decreased over time in both groups (p < 0.04). Persistent impairments in sensibility and reflex arm were most frequent at follow-up, whereas, a persistent positive Spurling test, and impairments in motor function were associated with higher NDI score. Neurological outcomes improved over time in patients undergoing surgery for CR with no between-group differences., However, persistent neurological impairments were common, and associated with poorer outcome for patient-reported neck disability.Clinical registration: clinicaltrial.gov NCT01547611, 08/03/2012, Title: Outcome of physiotherapy after surgery for cervical disc disease: a prospective multi-centre trial.

Appraising The Evidence for Conservative versus Surgical Management of Motor Deficits in Degenerative Cervical Radiculopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

Understanding the prevalence and outcome of motor deficits in degenerative cervical radiculopathy is important to guide management. We compared motor radiculopathy outcomes after conservative and surgical management, a particular focus being painful vs painless radiculopathy.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched. We stratified each study cohort into 1 of 6 groups, I-VI, based on whether radiculopathy was painful, painless or unspecified, and whether interventions were surgical or non-surgical.

RESULTS

Of 10 514 initial studies, 44 matched the selection criteria. Whilst 42 (95.5%) provided baseline motor radiculopathy data, only 22 (50.0%) provided follow-up motor outcomes. Mean baseline prevalence of motor deficits was 39.1% (9.2%-73.3%) in conservative cohorts and 60.5% (18.5%-94.1%) in surgical cohorts. Group VI, 'surgically-managed motor radiculopathy with unclear pain status' had the largest number of cohorts. Conversely, no cohorts were found in Group III, 'conservatively-managed painless motor radiculopathy'. Large disparities in data quality made direct comparison of conservative vs operative management difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall pre-intervention prevalence of motor deficits in degenerative cervical radiculopathy is 56.4%. Many studies fail to report motor outcomes after intervention, meaning statistical evidence to guide optimal management of motor radiculopathy is currently lacking. Our study highlights the need for more evidence, preferably from a prospective long-term study, to allow direct comparisons of motor outcomes after conservative and surgical management.

Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Fusion and Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

Patients with lateral cervical disc and foraminal pathology can be treated with anterior and posterior approaches including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF), cervical total disc arthroplasty(TDA), and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy(MIS-PCF). Although MIS-PCF may have some advantages over the anterior approaches, few comparative studies and meta-analyses have been done to assess superiority.

METHODS

This study includes a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of studies directly comparing minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy to either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical total disc arthroplasty.

RESULTS

In comparing patients undergoing ACDF and MIS-PCF, operative time ranged from 68 to 97.8 minutes in the ACDF group compared to 28 to 93.9 minutes in the MIS-PCF group. Mean postoperative length of stay ranged from 33.84 to 112.8 hours in the ACDF group compared to 13.68 to 83.6 hours in the MIS-PCF group. The total complication rates were 3.72% in the ACDF group and 3.73% in the MIS-PCF group. A random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out which failed to show a statistically significant difference in the complication rate between the two procedures(OR .91; 95% CI 0.13, 6.43; P = .92, I² = 59%). The total reoperation rate was 3.5% in the ACDF group and 5.4% in the MIS-PCF group. A random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out which failed to show a statistically significant difference in the reoperation rate between the two procedures(OR .66; 95% CI 0.33, 1.33; P = .25, I² = 0). In comparing patients undergoing TDA and MIS-PCF, operative time ranged from 90.3 to 106.7 minutes in the TDA group compared to 77.4 to 93.9 minutes in the MIS-PCF group. Mean postoperative length of stay ranged from 103.2 to 165.6 hours in the TDA group and 93.6 to 98.4 hours in the MIS-PCF group. The complication rate ranged from 23.5 to 28.6% in the TDA group and 0 to 14.3% in the MIS-PCF group. The overall reoperation rates were 2.6% in the TDA group and 10.2% in the MIS-PCF group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear superiority between MIS-PCF and ACDF/TDA in terms of operative time, postoperative length of stay, or rate of complications/reoperations. Further studies with increased follow-up intervals >48 months, and higher sample sizes are necessary to determine the true superiority of MIS-PCF and anterior neck approaches in treatment of lateral disc and foraminal pathology.

Limitations of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy-a decompression method of posteriorly shifting the nerve root-in cases of large anterior osteophytes in cervical radiculopathy: A retrospective multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Posterior cervical foraminotomy against anterior osteophyte is an indirect decompression procedure but less invasive compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Residual compression to the nerve root may lead to poor surgical outcomes. Although clinical results of posterior cervical foraminotomy for osteophytes are not considered better than those of disk herniation, osteophyte size and the association of the decompression area with poor surgical outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the limitations of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy and discuss the methods to improve surgical outcomes.

METHODS

We analyzed 55 consecutive patients with degenerative cervical radiculopathy who underwent minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy. Minimum postoperative follow-up duration was 1 year. We divided the patients into nonimproved and improved groups. The cutoff value between preoperative and postoperative Neck Disability Index scores was 30% improvement. Preoperative imaging data comprised disk height, local kyphosis, spinal cord compression, anterior osteophytes in the foramen, and anterior osteophytes of >50% of the intervertebral foramen diameter. Postoperative imaging data comprised craniocaudal length and lateral width of decompressed lamina, preserved superior facet width, and area of decompressed lamina.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were divided into two groups: nonimproved (n = 19) and improved (n = 36). The presence of osteophytes itself was not significant; however, the presence of osteophytes of >50% of the foramen diameter increased in the nonimproved group (P = 0.004). Mean lateral width and mean area of decompressed lamina after surgery significantly increased in the improved group (P = 0.001, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The presence of anterior osteophytes >50% of the diameter of the foramen led to poor improvement of clinical outcomes in minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy. However, the larger the lateral width and area of the decompressed lamina, the better the surgical outcome.

A systematic review of validated classification systems for cervical and lumbar spinal foraminal stenosis based on magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

Foraminal stenosis is commonly investigated with radiological methods in patients with radiating pain in extremities. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the methodology to assess compression of the nerve roots. This systematic review was performed to identify validated classification systems for foraminal stenosis in the lumbar and cervical spine based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The search included Cochrane, Embase, Medline and PubMed databases going back 30 years and up to September 2021. Three categories of words were used in different variations; foraminal stenosis, MRI and scoring. For inclusion, at least one word from each category had to be present. Articles suggesting classification systems or reporting on their validation were selected for inclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 823 articles were identified and all abstracts were reviewed. Subsequently, a full-text review of 64 articles was performed and finally 14 articles were included. A total of three validated classification systems were found for the cervical and lumbar spine. The remaining 11 articles reported on validation or suggested modifications of the classification systems.

CONCLUSION

The three classification systems demonstrated moderate to good reliability and have all been shown feasible in the clinical setting. There is however a need for further studies testing the validity of these classifications in relation to both clinical findings and to surgical outcome data.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mimics

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common adult-onset motor neuron disorder characterized by progressive degeneration of cortical, bulbar, and spinal motor neurons. When a patient presents with a progressive upper and/or lower motor syndrome, clinicians must pay particular attention to any atypical features in the history and/or clinical examination suggesting an alternate diagnosis, as up to 10% percent of patients initially diagnosed with ALS have a mimic of ALS. ALS is a clinical diagnosis and requires the exclusion of other disorders that may have similar presentations but a more favorable prognosis or an effective therapy. Because there is currently no specific diagnostic biomarker that is sensitive or specific for ALS, understanding the spectrum of clinical presentations of ALS and its mimics is paramount. While true mimics of ALS are rare, the clinician must correctly identify these disorders to avoid the misdiagnosis of ALS and to initiate effective treatment where available.

Detailed features and prognostic factors of twenty-three patients with drop finger caused by cervical radiculopathy: a retrospective multicentre study

PURPOSE

It has been reported that C7 and C8 nerve root impairment can cause drop finger; however, the clinical characteristics of each injured nerve root and post-operative outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the detailed features and surgery-related prognostic factors of drop finger caused by cervical radiculopathy.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated the clinical characteristics, paralysis patterns and surgery-related prognostic factors of 23 patients with drop finger caused by cervical radiculopathy who underwent posterior cervical foraminotomy. We classified paralysis into three patterns based on the fingers predominantly exhibiting extensor digitorum communis (EDC) muscle weakness: index finger side-dominant, middle and ring fingers-dominant and little finger side-dominant.

RESULTS

The aetiologies were cervical disc hernia (CDH) in ten patients, cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) in eight and both CDH and CSR in five. The levels of the decompressed root were C7 in one patient, C8 in 11 and both C7 and C8 in 11. Scapular pain was frequently observed as the initial symptom (78%), especially in patients with only C8 nerve root disorder (91%). Drop finger recovered to a score of ≥ 3 on manual muscle testing in 17 patients; patients with the little finger side-dominant pattern tended to have poor recoveries. Patients with CDH improved significantly than those with CSR or both CDH and CSR (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Good surgical recovery of drop finger can be expected in patients with CDH and in those with index fingers-dominant and middle and ring fingers-dominant patterns.

Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems

The study design of this paper is systematic review. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the existing radiological grading systems that are used to assess cervical foraminal stenosis. The importance of imaging the cervical spine using CT or MRI in evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis is widely accepted; however, there is no consensus for standardized methodology to assess the compression of the cervical nerve roots. A systematic search of Ovid Medline databases, Embase 1947 to present, Cinahl, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ISRCTN and WHO international clinical trials was performed for reports of cervical foraminal stenosis published before 01 February 2020. In collaboration with the University of Leeds, a search strategy was developed. A total of 6952 articles were identified with 59 included. Most of the reports involved multiple imaging modalities with standard axial and sagittal imaging used most. The grading themes that came from this systematic review show that the most mature for cervical foraminal stenosis is described by (Kim et al. Korean J Radiol 16:1294, 2015) and (Park et al. Br J Radiol 86:20120515, 2013). Imaging of the cervical nerve root canals is mostly performed using MRI and is reported using subjective terminology. The Park, Kim and Modified Kim systems for classifying the degree of stenosis of the nerve root canal have been described. Clinical application of these scoring systems is limited by their reliance on nonstandard imaging (Park), limited validation against clinical symptoms and surgical outcome data. Oblique fine cut images derived from three dimensional MRI datasets may yield more consistency, better clinical correlation, enhanced surgical decision-making and outcomes.

Cervical spine radiculopathy epidemiology: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cervical spine radiculopathy (CSR) is a disabling condition that has significant negative impacts on a person's mental health, physical functioning and social participation. Research has reported variable CSR incidence and prevalence among different populations. To date, no systematic review has been completed investigating the prevalence or incidence of CSR; therefore, our objective was to determine the incidence and/or prevalence of CSR in adults.

DESIGN AND METHOD

A systematic review was conducted including searches of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and CINAHL from inception to February 25, 2020. Studies including data on incidence and/or prevalence of CSR were included. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified Hayden, Cote and Bombardier appraisal checklist. Data were analysed narratively.

RESULTS

Nine low- to high-quality studies were included in the final review. Incidence ranged between 0.832 and 1.79 per 1,000 person-years from two high-quality and one low-quality study. Prevalence values ranged from 1.21 to 5.8 per 1,000 from four medium- to high-quality studies. Prevalence values of 1.14% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-1.82] and 1.31% (95% CI: 0.66-1.96) for males and females, respectively, were reported from one medium-quality study. One medium-quality study reported an unadjusted prevalence value of 6.3% for males and females.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review investigating the epidemiology of CSR in an adult population. This review reports a variable incidence rate and prevalence of CSR among specific populations; however, this was based on nine studies. There is a priority to investigate CSR epidemiology across other populations globally and standardising CSR diagnostic criteria.