Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for hemorrhagic arteriovenous malformations with or without prior resection or embolization

Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Focused Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Based on Rupture Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive treatment option for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). However, SRS cures are delayed, making it less favorable for higher risk ruptured bAVMs (rbAVMs) than unruptured (ubAVMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis explores the long-term outcomes of SRS-focused protocols for rbAVMs and ubAVMs. This study adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Literature search was conducted using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and hand-search on January 30th, 2025. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies: distinguishing cohorts by rupture status, reporting post-SRS outcomes, and without overlapping series. Pooled analysis was performed from 24 articles using DerSimonian-Laird random effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. All analyses were performed using R. For rbAVMs, the pooled rupture, obliteration, and mortality rates were 7.14% (95% CI: 5.76%-8.64%), 65.0% (95% CI: 57.2%-72.4%), and 0.87% (95% CI: 0.00%-5.14%), respectively, and for ubAVMs, 6.13% (95% CI: 4.71%-7.69%), 59.5% (95% CI: 51.3%-67.3%), and 0.89% (95% CI: 0.00%-3.82%), respectively. Subgroup meta-analyses of rupture rates and obliteration rates showed no significant differences based on prior treatments (Q = 2.47, p = 0.48; Q = 4.34, p = 0.23; respectively) or volume-staging protocols (Q = 4.90, p = 0.18; Q = 1.12, p = 0.77, respectively). Meta-regression analysis for rbAVMs demonstrated a positive correlation between intranidal aneurysms and rupture rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 100%), an inverse correlation between Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade I-II bAVMs and obliteration rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 68.6%), and a positive correlation between SM grade III-V bAVMs and obliteration rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 68.0%). Meta-regression analysis for ubAVMs demonstrated an inverse correlation between eloquent-region lesions and rupture rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 31.3%), and surprisingly a positive correlation between mean age and obliteration rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 23.8%). SRS-focused studies show similar long-term outcomes regardless of rupture status, but presence of underlying factors indicates the need for individualized risk-benefit analysis.

Efficacy of radiosurgery with and without angioembolization: A subgroup analysis of effectiveness in ruptured versus unruptured arteriovenous malformations - An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Congenital arterial defects such as cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) increase brain bleeding risk. Conservative therapy, microsurgical removal, percutaneous embolization, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), or a combination may treat this serious disease. This study compares angioembolization with SRS to SRS alone in ruptured or unruptured brain ateriovenous malformations (BAVM) patients.

Methods

We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations for this study. Until September 2023, PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for literature. English-language studies comparing SRS alone to embolization with SRS on ruptured or non-ruptured AVMs that could not be operated on were considered. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed research study quality.

Results

Results included 46 studies with a total of 7077 participants. There was a greater obliteration rate in the SRS-only group (60.4%) than in the embolization plus SRS group (49.73%). Particularly in the SRS-only group, ruptured AVMs showed a noticeably greater obliteration rate than unruptured AVMs (P = 0.002). However, no notable differences were found in hemorrhagic events or radiation-induced changes between the two groups; however, the SRS-only group had a slightly greater, yet not statistically significant, mortality rate.

Conclusion

Our data showed that ruptured brain AVMs had a much greater obliteration rate than unruptured ones, mostly due to SRS alone, without embolization. The aggregated data showed no significant changes, whereas SRS alone decreased radiation-induced alterations and hemorrhagic rates but with increased mortality. SRS alone may have a higher risk-to-reward ratio for nidus obliteration in ruptured brain AVM patients, so it should be used without embolization, although more research is needed to determine the effects of immediate and late complications.

Association of the combined stereotactic radiosurgery and embolization strategy and long-term outcomes in brain arteriovenous malformations with a volume >10 ml: A nationwide multicenter observational prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To assess the long-term outcome of large brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (volume > 10 ml) underwent combined embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (E+SRS) versus SRS alone.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from a nationwide multicenter prospective collaboration registry (MATCH study, August 2011-August 2021) and categorized into E+SRS and SRS alone cohorts. Propensity score-matched survival analysis was employed to control for potential confounding variables. The primary outcome was a composite event of non-fatal hemorrhagic stroke or death. Secondary outcomes were favorable patient outcomes, AVM obliteration, favorable neurological outcomes, seizure, worsened mRS score, radiation-induced changes (RIC), and embolization complications. Furthermore, the efficacy of distinct embolization strategies was evaluated. Hazard ratios (HRs) were computed utilizing Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Among 1063 AVMs who underwent SRS with or without prior embolization, 176 patients met the enrollment criteria. Following propensity score matching, the final analysis encompassed 98 patients (49 pairs). Median (interquartile range) follow-up duration for primary outcomes spanned 5.4 (2.7-8.4) years. Overall, the E+SRS strategy demonstrated a trend toward reduced incidence of primary outcomes compared to the SRS alone strategy (1.44 vs 2.37 per 100 patient-years; HR, 0.58 [95 % CI, 0.17-1.93]). Regardless of embolization degree or strategy, stratified analyses further consistently revealed a similar trend, albeit without achieving statistical significance. Secondary outcomes generally exhibited equivalence, but the combined approach showed potential superiority in most measures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests a trend toward lower long-term non-fatal hemorrhagic stroke or death risks with the E+SRS strategy when compared to SRS alone in large AVMs (volume > 10 ml).

The role of procedural factors on the outcomes of embolization followed by radiosurgery for the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: systematic review and proportional meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

Multimodal therapy for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVM) with embolization followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (E + SRS) has shown varying outcomes. Its benefits over other treatment modalities have been questioned. The goal of this systematic review was to determine the factors associated with cure and complication rates of this treatment strategy.

METHODS

A literature search in Medline and Global Index Medicus, from inception to October 2023, was performed. Studies reporting relevant outcome data from bAVM patients treated with E + SRS were included. Data on several patient, lesion and procedure-related factors were collected. Embolization intent was classified as Targeted (of high-risk features), Devascularizing (feeder embolization/flow reduction) and Occluding (intent-to-cure, nidus embolization). The primary outcome was obliteration rate. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS bleeding (PSB), post-embolization neurological complications (PENC) and post-SRS neurological complications (PSNC). Subgroup analyses included embolic agent, embolization intent and radiosurgery type. Proportional meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included in the review. The pooled obliteration rate was 56.45% (95% CI 50.94 to 61.88). Meta-regression analyses showed higher obliteration rates with Copolymers and lower obliteration rates with Devascularizing embolization. The pooled PSB, PENC and PSNC rates were 5.50%, 13.75% and 5.02%, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed higher rates of PSB, PENC and PSNC with Devascularizing embolization, Liquid & Solid embolic agents and Targeted & Devascularizing intent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Embolic agent and embolization intent were procedural factors associated with treatment outcomes of E + SRS in the management of bAVM patients. The efficacy and safety profiles favor copolymers as embolic agents and disfavor Devascularizing as embolization intent.

STUDY REGISTRATION

The protocol of the systematic review was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42023474171.

Radiosurgery With Prior Embolization Versus Radiosurgery Alone for Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The addition of adjuvant embolization to radiosurgery has been proposed as a means of improving treatment outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). However, the relative efficacy and safety of radiosurgery with adjuvant embolization vs radiosurgery alone remain uncertain. Moreover, previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have included a limited number of studies and did not consider the effects of baseline characteristics, including AVM volume, on the outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preradiosurgery embolization for intracranial AVMs with consideration to matching status between participants in each treatment group.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, up to January 2023. All studies evaluating the utilization of preradiosurgery embolization were included.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies (9 matched and 71 unmatched) with a total of 12 088 patients were included. The mean age of the included patients was 32.41 years, and 48.91% of the patients were female. Preradiosurgery embolization was used for larger AVMs and patients with previous hemorrhage ( P < .01, P = .02, respectively). The obliteration rate for preradiosurgery embolization (49.44%) was lower compared with radiosurgery alone (61.42%, odds ratio = 0.56, P < .01), regardless of the matching status of the analyzed studies. Although prior embolization was associated higher rate of cyst formation ( P = .04), it lowered the odds of radiation-induced changes ( P = .04). The risks of minor and major neurological deficits, postradiosurgery hemorrhage, and mortality were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that although preradiosurgery embolization is a suitable option to reduce the AVM size for future radiosurgical interventions, it may not be useful for same-sized AVMs eligible for radiosurgery. Utilization of preradiosurgery embolization in suitable lesions for radiosurgery may result in the added cost and burden of an endovascular procedure.

The impact of embolization on radiosurgery obliteration rates for brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

There exists no consensus in the literature regarding the impact of pre-stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) embolization on obliteration rates and clinical outcome after radiosurgery treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM). We performed a systematic review of four databases and included studies with at least 10 patients evaluating obliteration rates of intracranial AVMs treated with SRS alone (SRS cohort) and combined pre-SRS embolization followed by SRS (E + SRS cohort). Meta-analytic results were pooled together via random-effects models. A total of 43 studies, with 7103 patients, were included in our analysis. Among our included patients, complete obliteration was achieved in 51.5% (964/1871) of patients in the E + SRS cohort as compared to 61.5% (3217/5231) of patients in the SRS cohort. Meta-analysis of the pooled data revealed that obliteration was significantly lower in the E + SRS cohort (pooled OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.54-0.75, p < 0.0001). The use of pre-SRS embolization was significantly associated with lower AVM obliteration rates when compared to treatment with SRS alone. Our analysis seeks to provide a macroscopic insight into the complex interaction between pre-SRS embolization and brain AVM obliteration rates and prognosis. Pre-SRS embolization may still be beneficial in select patients, and further studies are needed to identify patients who benefit from neoadjuvant AVM embolization.

Effect of embolization before stereotactic radiosurgery for brain arteriovenous malformations: a case-control study with propensity score matching

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether endovascular embolization prior to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has a negative impact on nidus obliteration for patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs).

METHODS

A total of 704 eligible patients with AVM who did not undergo prior surgery or radiotherapy were evaluated. Of these patients, 593 were treated with SRS only, and 111 were treated with embolization followed by SRS (E+SRS). Most patients in the E+SRS group (88%) underwent embolization with n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. In the comparison of radiosurgical outcomes between patients treated with SRS only and E+SRS, these groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching to eliminate differences in basic characteristics. The primary outcome was to compare the nidus obliteration rates between the SRS-only and E+SRS groups. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of cumulative hemorrhage rates and the incidence of cyst formation or chronic encapsulated hematoma after SRS between these groups.

RESULTS

In the unmatched cohorts, the actuarial 3-, 5-, and 8-year nidus obliteration rates after a single SRS session were 49.6%, 69.4%, and 74.1% in the SRS-only group, respectively, and 30.7%, 50.9%, and 68.6% in the E+SRS group, respectively (p = 0.001). In the matched cohort of 98 patients in each group, the rates were 47.1%, 62.0%, and 69.6% in the SRS-only group and 32.5%, 55.3%, and 75.0% in the E+SRS group, respectively (p = 0.24). There was no significant difference in either cumulative hemorrhage or the incidence of cyst formation or chronic encapsulated hematoma between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-SRS embolization did not affect nidus obliteration rates, cumulative hemorrhage rates, or the incidence of cyst formation or chronic encapsulated hematoma as late adverse radiation effects in patients with AVM treated with SRS.

Efficacy and safety of embolization for arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia and thalamus via the transarterial approach

Background

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of transarterial embolization in the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) within the basal ganglia and thalamus.

Methods

A retrospective clinical study was performed on 22 patients with bAVMs localized within the basal ganglia and thalamus who were treated with transarterial embolization (December 2012 and January 2019) in our center. The bAVMs were embolized via the transarterial approach with Onyx or Glubran according to the anatomical structure. A detachable or undetachable microcatheter was used in the procedure according to the length of the feeding artery. The data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Among the 22 patients, 9 bAVMs were located in the basal ganglia and 13 were located in the thalamus. Twenty patients presented with hemorrhage (90.9%), leaving 2 patients (9.1%) who had no symptoms. According to the Spetzler-Martin grading classification, 13 bAVMs (59.1%) were grade 3, 7 (31.8%) were grade 4, and 2 (9.1%) were grade 5. Procedure-related complications occurred in only 1 patient (4.5%). No deaths related to the operation occurred. All patients achieved anatomic stabilization and no bleeding was observed in the follow-up.

Conclusions

Selective embolization via the transarterial approach is safe and effective for bAVMs originating within the basal ganglia and thalamus. Our results demonstrate a low rate of complications and an elevated degree of anatomical disruption in the endovascular treatment of bAVMs stemming from the basal ganglia and thalamus.

Awake surgery for right frontal lobe glioma can preserve visuospatial cognition and spatial working memory

PURPOSE

Awake surgery is the standard treatment to preserve motor and language functions. This longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the resection rate and preservation of neurocognitive functions in patients with right frontal lobe glioma who underwent awake surgery.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients (mean age, 48.0 years) with right frontal lobe glioma who underwent awake surgery at our hospital between 2013 and 2019 were included. Fourteen, thirteen, and six cases had WHO classification grades of II, III, and IV, respectively. We evaluated visuospatial cognition (VSC) and spatial working memory (SWM) before and three months after surgery. Relevant brain areas for VSC and SWM were intraoperatively mapped, whenever the task was successfully accomplished. Therefore, patients were divided into an intraoperative evaluation group and a non-evaluation group for each function, and the resection rate and functional outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The removal rate in the evaluation group for VSC and SWM were similar to that in the non-evaluation group. Chronic impairment rate of VSC was significantly lower in the evaluation than in the non-evaluation group (5.6% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.034). No patient showed postoperative SWM impairment in the evaluation group as opposed to the non-evaluation group (16.7%, p = 0.049). The probability of resection of the deeper posterior part of the middle frontal gyrus, the relevant area of VSC, was higher in the non-evaluation group than in the evaluation group.

CONCLUSIONS

We statistically verified that awake surgery for right frontal lobe glioma results in successful preservation of VSC and SWM with satisfying resection rates.