Cerebrospinal fluid fistula from fractured acrylic cranioplasty plate. Case report

Histological Processing of CAD/CAM Titanium Scaffold after Long-Term Failure in Cranioplasty

Cranioplasty is a frequently performed procedure after craniectomy and includes several techniques with different materials. Due to high overall complication rates, alloplastic implants are removed in many cases. Lack of implant material osseointegration is often assumed as a reason for failure, but no study has proven this in cranioplasty. This study histologically evaluates the osteointegration of a computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) titanium scaffold with an open mesh structure used for cranioplasty. A CAD/CAM titanium scaffold was removed due to late soft tissue complications 7.6 years after cranioplasty. The histological analyses involved the preparation of non-decalcified slices from the scaffold’s inner and outer sides as well as a light-microscopic evaluation, including the quantification of the bone that had formed over the years. Within the scaffold pores, vital connective tissue with both blood vessels and nerves was found. Exclusive bone formation only occurred at the edges of the implant, covering 0.21% of the skin-facing outer surface area. The inner scaffold surface, facing towards the brain, did not show any mineralization at all. Although conventional alloplastic materials for cranioplasty reduce surgery time and provide good esthetic results while mechanically protecting the underlying structures, a lack of adequate stimuli could explain the limited bone formation found. CAD/CAM porous titanium scaffolds alone insufficiently osseointegrate in such large bone defects of the skull. Future research should investigate alternative routes that enable long-term osteointegration in order to reduce complication rates after cranioplasty. Opportunities could be found in mechano-biologically optimized scaffolds, material modifications, surface coatings, or other routes to sustain bone formation.

Evaluation of titanium mesh cranioplasty and polyetheretherketone cranioplasty: protocol for a multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Cranioplasty is a common surgery in neurosurgery department. However, restoring the integrity of skull brings many challenges to surgeons, and the selection of ideal implant materials is throughout the history of cranioplasty. Although titanium mesh was still preferred by many neurosurgeons in cranial reconstruction, the new polyetheretherketone (PEEK) material, for example, is gaining popularity for craniofacial reconstruction today. There remain limited data that compare the outcome of PEEK cranioplasty and titanium mesh cranioplasty. It is necessary to conduct a study to compare outcome of different materials for cranioplasty.

METHODS/DESIGN

In this multicentre, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled study, we will randomise 140 patients in a 1:1 ratio to PEEK cranioplasty versus titanium cranioplasty. Eligible patients are adults who were diagnosed with cranial defect (due to severe traumatic brain injury, ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke, infiltrative tumour and so on), the defect size is over 25 cm², and they need to agree to participate in this trial. Instead of standard examinations, the enrolled patients receive neurological, motor, cognitive function and cerebral hemodynamics examinations as well as cosmetic evaluation. The procedures are repeated 3, 6 months after cranioplasty. The primary outcome, defined as infection or implant exposure after surgery, is the implant failure rate within 6 months. Secondary outcomes include postoperative complication rates, neurological outcomes, motor function, cerebral hemodynamics, cosmetic outcome and the total cost over a 6-month period.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial protocol has been approved by Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. All patients will be fully informed the implant materials, potential complications after surgery, responsibilities during the trial, and they will sign the informed consent before joining in this trial. If the patient's cognitive function is impaired, the patient's next of kin would be carefully informed. The results will be disseminated through academic conferences, student theses and will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900024625; Pre-results.

Calvarial Reconstruction

Calvarial reconstruction is a challenge to reconstructive surgeons, especially considering protection of intracranial contents. In recent years, the advent of multiple reconstructive materials adds tools to the surgical armamentarium. Options include autologous split calvarial and rib grafts and alloplastic materials such as titanium mesh, methyl methacrylate, calcium hydroxyapatite, and polyetheretherketone. The most important aspect of cranial reconstruction still lies in finding the most aesthetic, safe, and reliable means of filling a defect.

Evolution of cranioplasty techniques in neurosurgery: historical review, pediatric considerations, and current trends

Cranial bone repair is one of the oldest neurosurgical practices. Reconstructing the natural contours of the skull has challenged the ingenuity of surgeons from antiquity to the present day. Given the continuous improvement of neurosurgical and emergency care over the past century, more patients survive such head injuries, thus necessitating more than ever before a simple, safe, and durable means of correcting skull defects. In response, numerous techniques and materials have been devised as the art of cranioplasty has progressed. Although the goals of cranioplasty remain the same, the evolution of techniques and diversity of materials used serves as testimony to the complexity of this task. This paper highlights the evolution of these materials and techniques, with a particular focus on the implications for managing pediatric calvarial repair and emerging trends within the field.

Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis

Cranioplasty, one of the oldest surgical procedures used to repair cranial defects, has undergone many revolutions over time to find the ideal material to improve patient prognosis. Cranioplasty offers cosmetic and protective benefits for patients with cranial defects. The first primitive cranioplasty procedures date back to 7000 bc and used metal and gourds to repair cranial defects. Cranioplasty was first documented by Fallopius who described repair using gold plates; the first bone graft was documented by van Meekeren. The first significant improvement for this procedure began with experimentation involving bone grafts in the late 19th century as a more natural approach for repairing cranial defects. The next impetus for advancement came because of wartime injuries incurred during World Wars I and II and involved experimentation with synthetic materials to counter the common complications associated with bone grafts. Methyl methacrylate, hydroxyapatite, ceramics, and polyetheretherketone implants among other materials have since been researched and used. Research now has shifted toward molecular biology to improve the ability of the patient to regenerate bone using bone growth factors. This paper reviews the evolution of materials used over time in addition to the various advantages and pitfalls associated with each change. It is important for neurosurgeons to be mindful of how these techniques have evolved in order to gain a better understanding of this procedure and how it has been adapted.

World War II, tantalum, and the evolution of modern cranioplasty technique

Cranioplasty is a unique procedure with a rich history. Since ancient times, a diverse array of materials from coconut shells to gold plates has been used for the repair of cranial defects. More recently, World War II greatly increased the demand for cranioplasty procedures and renewed interest in the search for a suitable synthetic material for cranioprostheses. Experimental evidence revealed that tantalum was biologically inert to acid and oxidative stresses. In fact, the observation that tantalum did not absorb acid resulted in the metal being named after Tantalus, the Greek mythological figure who was condemned to a pool of water in the Underworld that would recede when he tried to take a drink. In clinical use, malleability facilitated a single-stage cosmetic repair of cranial defects. Tantalum became the preferred cranioplasty material for more than 1000 procedures performed during World War II. In fact, its use was rapidly adopted in the civilian population. During World War II and the heyday of tantalum cranioplasty, there was a rapid evolution in prosthesis implantation and fixation techniques significantly shaping how cranioplasties are performed today. Several years after the war, acrylic emerged as the cranioplasty material of choice. It had several clear advantages over its metallic counterparts. Titanium, which was less radiopaque and had a more optimal thermal conductivity profile (less thermally conductive), eventually supplanted tantalum as the most common metallic cranioplasty material. While tantalum cranioplasty was popular for only a decade, it represented a significant breakthrough in synthetic cranioplasty. The experiences of wartime neurosurgeons with tantalum cranioplasty played a pivotal role in the evolution of modern cranioplasty techniques and ultimately led to a heightened understanding of the necessary attributes of an ideal synthetic cranioplasty material. Indeed, the history of tantalum cranioplasty serves as a model for innovative thinking and adaptive technology development.

Simple and safe method of cranial reconstruction after posterior fossa craniectomy

BACKGROUND

Reconstructing the posterior fossa after surgical intervention in this region is important both for prevention of postoperative complication such as headache and for cosmetic purposes. Several methods have been reported that use either synthetic or natural graft, the latter being either autograft or allograft. The previously described methods require either surgical intervention on a second setting or an additional procedure that prolongs the time of the surgery and may contribute to morbidity. The present report describes a simple modified method of reconstructing the postcraniectomy defect by using the patients' own bone dust, tissue glue, and gel foam sheets.

METHODS

The method of reconstruction requires collection of as much as possible of the produced bone dust at the time of craniectomy, adding tissue glue, placing in between 2 sheets of gel foam, and shaping it to match the surgical defect.

RESULTS

Ten cases of various posterior fossa pathologies managed at King Faisal hospital of the university between January 2000 and September 2004 had reconstruction of the posterior fossa after craniectomy during the same operative setting using the described method of cranial reconstruction. No complication was noted. Patients did not have any delayed postcraniectomy pain at reconstruction site. Postoperative plane x-ray of the skull and computed tomography showed good healing and shaping of the suboccipital bone at the surgical defect.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstructive cranioplasty is an important part of any posterior fossa exposure. The present report describes a safe and simple method that gives acceptable results both clinically and radiologically.

Long-term results following reconstruction of craniofacial defects with titanium micro-mesh systems

INTRODUCTION

Reconstruction of craniofacial defects can be carried out with autogenous tissue (calvarium, rib, iliac crest), allogeneic implants (AAA-bone, lyophilized cartilage) or alloplastic material (methacrylate, hydroxyapatite, titanium implants and mesh systems). Selection of the implant material used for reconstruction is still controversial.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

At the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kantonsspital Luzern, 20 patients with defects in the craniofacial and/or orbito-ethmoidal region have been treated using titanium micro-mesh between 1991 and 1998. Two different mesh systems, micro-titanium augmentation mesh and dynamic mesh, have been used for bony reconstruction in non load-bearing areas. The defects were caused by acute trauma, osteomyelitis of the frontal bone and previous operations. The titanium micro-mesh was used with the following indications: (1) immediate reconstruction in the primary treatment of comminuted fractures with bone loss in non load-bearing areas, (2) treatment of contour irregularities (possibly in combination with bone or cartilage grafts). All patients were followed up clinically and radiographically at quarterly intervals for a year.

RESULTS

No wound infections, exposures or loss of the mesh have been observed. Long-term stability of the reconstructions was excellent. When walls of the paranasal sinuses were reconstructed complete repneumatisation took place.

CONCLUSIONS

Advantages of this reconstructive technique are: (1) universal applicability (craniofacial, orbital, sinus defects, comminuted fractures); (2) stable 3-D reconstruction of complex anatomic structures were easily performed; (3) immediate availability with no donor site morbidity as bone or cartilage grafts were not necessary; (4) combination with bone or cartilage grafts is possible; and (5) very low susceptibility to infection.

Repairing holes in the head: a history of cranioplasty

Cranioplasty is almost as ancient as trephination, yet its fascinating history has been neglected. There is strong evidence that Incan surgeons were performing cranioplasty using precious metals and gourds. Interestingly, early surgical authors, such as Hippocrates and Galen, do not discuss cranioplasty and it was not until the 16th century that cranioplasty in the form of a gold plate was mentioned by Fallopius. The first bone graft was recorded by Meekeren, who in 1668 noted that canine bone was used to repair a cranial defect in a Russian man. The next advance in cranioplasty was the experimental groundwork in bone grafting, performed in the late 19th century. The use of autografts for cranioplasty became popular in the early 20th century. The destructive nature of 20th century warfare provided an impetus to search for alternative metals and plastics to cover large cranial defects. The metallic bone substitutes have largely been replaced by modern plastics. Methyl methacrylate was introduced in 1940 and is currently the most common material used. Research in cranioplasty is now directed at improving the ability of the host to regenerate bone. As modern day trephiners, neurosurgeons should be cognizant of how the technique of repairing a hole in the head has evolved.

Repair of human skull defects using osteoinductive bone alloimplants

To estimate the efficacy of cranioplasty in clinical practice, autolyzed, antigen-extracted, allogenic (AAA) bone was prepared from cortical bones of human organ donors. AAA bone implants consisted of completely demineralized bone powder, completely demineralized pliable bone chips, surface-demineralized bone chips with pliable crevices, surface-demineralized rigid bone chips, or combinations thereof. 21 patients received AAA bone cranioplasties and were followed-up for between 12 and 58 months (average: 29 months). No infection or rejection of any of the AAA bone implants occurred. X-ray assessments as well as bone scintigraphies revealed osseous integration and remodelling of the AAA bone implants with minimal resorption, with the exception of completely demineralized AAA bone chips which showed partial resorption (2 cases). However, the partial resorption of completely demineralized AAA bone chips ceased after the implants had been remodelled. In 4 cases, the osteosynthesis material was removed between 10 and 18 months after the cranioplasty. In another case, a re-entry was necessary because of recurrence of an intracranial tumor. All of these five AAA bone reconstructions showed bleeding surfaces and osseous consolidations at the time of re-entry. A bone biopsy taken from one of these cranioplasties showed osteoinduction on the surface of the AAA bone implants. This first clinical review of cranial reconstructions using osteoinductive AAA bone implants emphasizes the therapeutical application of AAA bone for cranioplasty. Large AAA bone chips from human skull bones facilitate the reproduction of the skull's convexity especially when combined with preoperative stereolithography-based planning.

Imaging after titanium cranioplasty

Titanium cranioplasty has been used in our unit for reconstruction of cranial defects following trauma, tumour resection and bone loss due to postcraniotomy infection. It has previously been assumed that imaging to assess recurrence of disease progression after cranioplasty would be severely compromised in the presence of metallic material. Titanium is a non-ferrous metal of low atomic number, which is relatively radiolucent and allows exceptionally clear images to be obtained without significant degradation of image quality, on CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Cases are presented that demonstrate the use of CT contrast cisternography and MR imaging after titanium cranioplasty. On the basis of its strength, biocompatibility and excellent handling characteristics, allied to its suitability for all post-operative imaging techniques, we conclude that titanium plate is the material of choice for cranioplasty.

Hydroxylapatite cranioplasty directly over dura

Seven patients who had noticeable defects of their frontal bone were reconstructed with dense hydroxylapatite (HA) particles with or without autogenous bone placed directly over the dura. The results indicate that HA is well tolerated over dura; no meningitis occurred with follow-up of one to 3 1/2 years. The clinical response was excellent and complications were minor, generally related to particle control and settling.