Conducted somatosensory evoked potentials during spinal surgery. Part 1: control conduction velocity measurements

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring: an updated position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are used to assess the functional status of somatosensory pathways during surgical procedures and can help protect patients' neurological integrity intraoperatively. This is a position statement on intraoperative SEP monitoring from the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) and updates prior ASNM position statements on SEPs from the years 2005 and 2010. This position statement is endorsed by ASNM and serves as an educational service to the neurophysiological community on the recommended use of SEPs as a neurophysiological monitoring tool. It presents the rationale for SEP utilization and its clinical applications. It also covers the relevant anatomy, technical methodology for setup and signal acquisition, signal interpretation, anesthesia and physiological considerations, and documentation and credentialing requirements to optimize SEP monitoring to aid in protecting the nervous system during surgery.

Measuring Spinal Cord Potentials and Cortico-Spinal Interactions After Wrist Movements Induced by Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Electroencephalographic (EEG) correlates of movement have been studied extensively over many years. In the present work, we focus on investigating neural correlates that originate from the spine and study their connectivity to corresponding signals from the sensorimotor cortex using multivariate autoregressive (MVAR) models. To study cortico-spinal interactions, we simultaneously measured spinal cord potentials (SCPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) of wrist movements elicited by neuromuscular electrical stimulation. We identified directional connections between spine and cortex during both the extension and flexion of the wrist using only non-invasive recording techniques. Our connectivity estimation results are in alignment with various studies investigating correlates of movement, i.e., we found the contralateral side of the sensorimotor cortex to be the main sink of information as well as the spine to be the main source of it. Both types of movement could also be clearly identified in the time-domain signals.

Assessment of thoracic spinal cord electrophysiological activity through magnetoneurography

OBJECTIVE

Noninvasive and detailed visualization of electrophysiological activity in the thoracic spinal cord through magnetoneurography.

METHODS

In five healthy volunteers, magnetic fields around current flowing in the thoracic spinal cord after alternating unilateral and synchronized bilateral sciatic nerve stimulation were measured using a magnetoneurograph system with superconductive quantum interference device biomagnetometers. The current distribution was obtained from the magnetic data by spatial filtering and visualized by superimposing it on the X-ray image. Conduction velocity was calculated using the peak latency of the current waveforms.

RESULTS

A sufficiently high magnetic signal intensity and signal-to-noise ratio were obtained in all participants after synchronized bilateral sciatic nerve stimulation. Leading and trailing components along the spinal canal and inward components flowing into the depolarization site ascended to the upper thoracic spine. Conduction velocity of the inward current in the whole thoracic spine was 42.4 m/s.

CONCLUSIONS

Visualization of electrophysiological activity in the thoracic spinal cord was achieved through magnetoneurography and a new method for synchronized bilateral sciatic nerve stimulation. Magnetoneurography is expected to be a useful modality in functional assessment of thoracic myelopathy.

SIGNIFICANCE

This is the first report to use magnetoneurography to noninvasively visualize electrophysiological activity in the thoracic spinal cord in detail.

SEP Montage Variability Comparison during Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring

Intraoperative monitoring is performed to provide real-time assessment of the neural structures that can be at risk during spinal surgery. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are the most commonly used modality for intraoperative monitoring. SEP stability can be affected by many factors during the surgery. This study is a prospective review of SEP recordings obtained during intraoperative monitoring of instrumented spinal surgeries that were performed for chronic underlying neurologic and neuromuscular conditions, such as scoliosis, myelopathy, and spinal stenosis. We analyzed multiple montages at the baseline, and then followed their development throughout the procedure. Our intention was to examine the stability of the SEP recordings throughout the surgical procedure on multiple montages of cortical SEP recordings, with the goal of identifying the appropriate combination of the least number of montages that gives the highest yield of monitorable surgeries. Our study shows that it is necessary to have multiple montages for SEP recordings, as it reduces the number of non-monitorable cases, improves IOM reliability, and therefore could reduce false positives warnings to the surgeons. Out of all the typical montages available for use, our study has shown that the recording montage Cz-C4/Cz-C3 (Cz-Cc) is the most reliable and stable throughout the procedure and should be the preferred montage followed throughout the surgery.

Anesthetic Management for Pediatric Spinal Fusion: Implications of Advances in Spinal Cord Monitoring

Currently, the detection of emerging injury through intraoperative neurologic monitoring is the best way to prevent neurologic injury. This requires a team approach that includes the anesthesiologist, neurophysiologist, and surgeon. The monitoring modalities available for the patient must be considered in planning the anesthetic management. In addition, intraoperative care for the patient requires an ongoing attention to how the anesthetic drugs affect spinal cord monitoring.

Intraoperative Monitoring Using Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

OBJECTIVE

To provide an educational service to the intraoperative neurophysiologist community by publishing a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring on the recommended appropriate and correct use of somatosensory evoked potentials as an intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring tool to protect patient well-being during surgery. This position statement presents the somatosensory evoked potential utilization basis, relevant anatomy, patient preparation, important systemic factors, anesthesia considerations, safety and technical considerations, documentation requirements, neurophysiologist credentials and staffing practice patterns, and monitoring applications for protecting brain, spinal nerve root, peripheral nerve, plexus and spinal cord function. In conclusion, a summary of major recommendations regarding the use of somatosensory evoked potentials in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is presented.

Impact of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring on cervical surgery

Controversy still exists about the necessity of somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring during cervical surgery. The purpose of this prospective study is to determine the impact of SSEP monitoring on anterior cervical surgery. Intraoperative SSEP monitoring was performed in 100 patients treated by an anterior cervical approach. The patients were divided into three groups according to their preoperative clinical condition. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was performed during five stages of the procedure: M1, after the induction of anesthesia; M2, during positioning; M3, during distraction of the intervertebral space; M4, throughout decompression; and M5, during graft placement. Normal SSEPs were obtained during M1 from all the patients in group 2. Pathologic SSEPs were recorded at M1 in 45 patients from group 1. No SSEPs were recorded at M1 in six patients in group 3. A deterioration of the SSEPs was observed in 35 patients during M2. Deteriorated SSEPs were observed during M3 in 14 patients. No deterioration of the SSEPs was recorded during M4. Intraoperative SSEP monitoring is easy to perform and helps to increase safety during anterior cervical surgery. Critical phases of the surgical procedure were identified and the surgical strategy was modified as a result of this study.

Spinal cord mapping as an adjunct for resection of intramedullary tumors: surgical technique with case illustrations

OBJECTIVE

Resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors may result in transient or permanent neurological deficits. Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials are commonly used to limit complications. We used both antidromically elicited SSEPs for planning the myelotomy site and direct mapping of spinal cord tracts during tumor resection to reduce the risk of neurological deficits and increase the extent of tumor resection.

METHODS

In two patients, 3 and 12 years of age, with tumors of the thoracic and cervical spinal cord, respectively, antidromically elicited SSEPs were evoked by stimulation of the dorsal columns and were recorded with subdermal electrodes placed at the medial malleoli bilaterally. Intramedullary spinal cord mapping was performed by stimulating the resection cavity with a handheld Ojemann stimulator (Radionics, Burlington, MA). In addition to visual observation, subdermal needle electrodes inserted into the abductor pollicis brevis-flexor digiti minimi manus, tibialis anterior-gastrocnemius, and abductor halluces-abductor digiti minimi pedis muscles bilaterally recorded responses that identified motor pathways.

RESULTS

The midline of the spinal cord was anatomically identified by visualizing branches of the dorsal medullary vein penetrating the median sulcus. Antidromic responses were obtained by stimulation at 1-mm intervals on either side of the midline, and the region where no response was elicited was selected for the myelotomy. The anatomic and electrical midlines did not precisely overlap. Stimulation of abnormal tissue within the tumor did not elicit electromyographic activity. Approaching the periphery of the tumor, stimulation at 1 mA elicited an electromyographic response before normal spinal cord was visualized. Restimulation at lower currents by use of 0.25-mA increments identified the descending motor tracts adjacent to the tumor. After tumor resection, the tracts were restimulated to confirm functional integrity. Both patients were discharged within 2 weeks of surgery with minimal neurological deficits.

CONCLUSION

Antidromically elicited SSEPs were important in determining the midline of a distorted cord for placement of the myelotomy incision. Mapping spinal cord motor tracts with direct spinal cord stimulation and electromyographic recording facilitated the extent of surgical resection.

Spinal cord monitoring

Over the past two decades, intraoperative spinal cord monitoring has matured into a widely used clinical tool. It is used when the spinal cord is at risk for damage during a surgical procedure. This includes orthopedic, neurosurgical, and certain cardiothoracic procedures. Both somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and direct motor pathway stimulation techniques are available. The SEP techniques are used most widely, are generally accepted, and have been shown to reduce surgical morbidity. A large multicenter study has shown that SEP monitoring reduces postoperative paraplegia by more than 50-60%. Techniques and literature on clinical applications are reviewed in this report.

Spinal tracts producing slow components of spinal cord potentials evoked by descending volleys in man

Slow negative (N) and slow positive (P) waves are frequently produced in the posterior epidural space at the lumbosacral enlargement by epidural stimulation of the rostral part of human spinal cord. The production of these slow potentials are thought to be responsible for analgesia at the stimulated segment as well as below that level. In order to define the spinal tract which mediates these slow potentials, we stimulated directly or from the epidural space the dorsal, dorsolateral, lateral and ventral columns at the cervical or thoracic level, and epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials (des.SCPs) at the lumbosacral enlargement in 7 patients who underwent spine or spinal cord surgery. The des.SCPs recorded in the lumbosacral enlargement consisted of polyphasic spike potentials followed by slow N and P waves. At a near threshold level of stimulus intensity the slow N and P potentials were consistently elicited only by stimulation of the dorsal column. The slow waves were also produced by intense stimulation of other tracts, but remained significantly (P < 0.05 - P < 0.01) smaller than those evoked by dorsal column stimulation when compared at the same stimulus intensity. Moreover, the slow P wave could not be elicited even by intense stimulation (10 times the threshold strength for the initial spike potentials) of the ventral column. Thus, the results suggest that the slow N and P waves are mostly mediated by the antidromic impulses descending through the dorsal column.

Spinal cord evoked potential monitoring after spinal cord stimulation during surgery of spinal cord tumors

Spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) after spinal cord stimulation were used as a method of spinal cord monitoring during surgery of 6 extramedullary and 14 intramedullary spinal cord tumors. SCEPs were recorded from an epidural electrode placed rostral to the level of the tumor. Electrical stimulation was applied on the dorsal spinal cord from a caudally placed epidural electrode. The wave forms of SCEPs consisted of a sharp negative peak (N1) in 15 cases and two negative peaks (N1 and N2) in 5 cases. The N2 wave was markedly attenuated by posterior midline myelotomy, whereas the N1 activity showed less-remarkable changes by myelotomy. An increase in N1 amplitude was observed after the removal of the tumor in four extramedullary and three intramedullary cases. Of six patients that showed decreased N1 amplitude after the removal of the tumor, five patients developed postoperative motor deficits. However, there were four false-negative cases and one false-positive case in regard to changes of N1 amplitude and postoperative motor deficits. Four false results occurred in intramedullary cases. In two of them, postoperative symptoms indicated intraoperative unilateral damage to the spinal cord. The position of the stimulating electrode, the difference in thresholds of the axons for electrical stimulation between the right and left side of the spinal cord, or the change of the distance between the electrode and the spinal cord surface may account for these false results. Thus, our analysis of the changes of SCEP wave forms and early postoperative symptoms indicates that the sensitivity of this monitoring method to detect intraoperative insults to the spinal cord is unsatisfactory in spite of the reproducible wave forms. We conclude that SCEP monitoring can be used as an alternative method or in combination with other types of evoked potentials in patients with severe spinal cord lesions who show abnormal somatosensory evoked potentials preoperatively.

Direct spinal versus peripheral nerve stimulation as monitoring techniques in epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials

We recorded spinal cord evoked potentials (SCEPs) and spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (spinal SEPs) in 30 operations following stimulation of the epidural spinal cord and the peripheral nerve, respectively, to compare their feasibility as an intraoperative technique for spinal cord monitoring. SCEPs produced quicker responses and had larger amplitudes with simpler waveforms. SCEPs could reflect residual function of the pathological spinal cord and predict the postoperative clinical outcome, findings which are not observed with spinal SEPs. Moreover, SCEPs had a much higher sensitivity to spinal cord insult. Therefore, we conclude that the SCEPs were more appropriate indicator than the spinal SEPs as an intra-operative monitoring method for spinal cord function.

Intraoperative recordings of spinal somatosensory evoked potentials to tibial nerve and sural nerve stimulation

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to stimulation of the tibial nerve at the knee (TN-K) and ankle (TN-A), and the sural nerve at the ankle (SN-A), were recorded from 3 or 4 spinal levels during surgery for scoliosis in 11 neurologically normal subjects. With stimulation of all 3 nerves, the propagation velocity along the spine was nonlinear: it was faster over cauda equina and midthoracic cord than over caudal spinal cord. Over the mid-thoracic cord, TN-K SSEP propagation was faster than that of TN-A and SN-A SSEPs, whereas over the caudal spinal cord these values were similar on stimulation of all 3 nerves. These data suggest that fast conducting second order afferent fiber systems contribute to spinal cord SSEPs evoked by stimulating both mixed and cutaneous peripheral nerves.

Distribution of lumbar spinal evoked potentials and their correlation with stimulation-induced paresthesiae

In 7 awake patients with neuropathic lower extremity pain, spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were elicited from the non-painful leg by electrical stimulation of the peroneal nerve and mechanical stimulation of the hallux ball. Recording was made epidurally in the thoraco-lumbar region by means of an electrode temporarily inserted for trial of pain-suppressing stimulation. In response to peroneal nerve stimulation, two major SEP complexes were found. The first complex consisted, as has been described earlier, of an initial positivity (P12), a spike-like negativity (N14), a slow negativity (N16) and a slow positivity (P23). The second complex consisted of a slow biphasic wave, conceivably mediated by a supraspinal loop. Both complexes had a similar longitudinal distribution with amplitude maxima at the T12 vertebral body. The SEP evoked by mechanical hallux ball stimulation had a relatively small amplitude, and there was no significant second complex. The relationship between stimulus intensity and SEP amplitude was negatively accelerating. The longitudinal distribution of spinal SEP was compared with the somatotopic distribution of paresthesiae induced by stimulation through the epidural electrode. It was found that stimulation applied at the level of maximal SEP generally induced paresthesiae in the corresponding peripheral region. Therefore, spinal SEP may be used as a guide for optimal positioning of a spinal electrode for therapeutic stimulation when implanted under general anesthesia. An attempt was made to record the antidromic potential in the peroneal nerve elicited from the dorsal columns by epidural stimulation. The antidromic response was, however, very sensitive to minimal changes of stimulus strength and body position of the patient, and was also contaminated by simultaneously evoked muscular reflex potentials. Thus, peripheral responses evoked by epidural stimulation appeared too unreliable to be useful for the permanent implantation of a spinal electrode for therapeutic stimulation.

[Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgery for scoliosis in young adults: apropos of 33 cases]

The risk of serious neurologic complications in spinal surgery for scoliosis is not insignificant. The recording of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (CSEP) is an electrophysiological method of monitoring during surgery. Measurement of CSEPs was carried out before, during and after surgery in a preliminary series of 33 patients. These recordings were made: after induction of anesthesia and exposure of the spine; after instrumentation but without correction; after maximum traction; and at termination of surgery. The aim of this work was to establish alarm criteria. Statistical analysis showed a significant increase in latencies after instrumentation without correction, and after maximum traction. The alarm criteria were determined as an increase of more than 5 msec in the first positive deflection associated with an unusual drop in amplitude (over 75%). If these anomalies persist, the "wake-up test" must be used. In practice, this monitoring has often aided in reducing the period of surgery by using the "wake-up test" in a few selected cases.

Conduction properties of epidurally recorded spinal cord potentials following lower limb stimulation in man

Spinal somatosensory evoked potentials were recorded in 35 neurologically normal patients undergoing surgery for scoliosis. During posterior procedures the recording electrodes were placed in the dorsal epidural space and during anterior operations in the intervertebral discs. Stimulation was of the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa and the posterior tibial and sural nerves at the ankle. At thoracic levels the response consisted of at least 3 components with different peripheral excitation thresholds and spinal conduction velocities (range 35-85 m/sec). All components were conducted mainly in tracts ipsilateral to the stimulus, component 1 being most laterally located. At low stimulus intensity only the fastest activity was recorded but this was markedly delayed over low thoracic segments and was recorded as a repetitive discharge rostrally. Higher intensities elicited additional components which were conducted at a slower but relatively uniform velocity; consequently they might overlap with or even overtake the fast activity at mid-to-low thoracic levels. Component 1 was much less prominent when the posterior tibial nerve was stimulated at the ankle and absent from the (cutaneous) sural nerve response; remaining potentials were conducted at velocities similar to those of components 2 and 3 following tibial nerve stimulation at the knee. Small 'stationary' potentials were recorded at all thoracic levels, probably due to the change in conductivity as the volley entered the spinal cord. Efferent activity was recorded at and below the thoraco-lumbar junction, possibly related to the H-reflex or F-wave. Similar, although smaller, afferent potentials were recorded from the anterior side of the vertebral column. Component 1 is likely to be due to the stimulation of group 1 muscle afferents which terminate in the dorsal horn and activate second order neurones, many of whose axons go to form the ipsilateral dorsal spinocerebellar tract. Components 2 and 3 are believed to be largely cutaneous in origin and to be conducted mainly in the dorsal columns.

Subpial spinal evoked potentials in patients undergoing junctional dorsal root entry zone coagulation for pain relief

Seven patients with complete avulsion of the brachial plexus underwent junctional coagulation lesions of the dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) for relief of intractable pain in the paralyzed arm. Intra-operative monitoring by recording spinal cord somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) resulting from tibial nerve stimulation was done using subpial recording electrodes situated dorsal to the posterior median sulcus at the C4 and T2 segment. SEP on the normal side showed an initial positive wave and two negative waves followed by a group of high frequency waves of relatively high amplitude which continued into high frequency, low amplitude potentials. The conduction velocity of the fastest spinal evoked potential components were, on average, 86 m/s. Recordings from the side of avulsion revealed a steep positive potential of high amplitude which appeared in five patients prior to the creation of the DREZ lesion. This effect was assumed to be secondary to spinal cord damage caused by avulsion. During the DREZ coagulation the SEP from the unaffected side did not change. On the side of DREZ coagulation the velocity of the fastest fibres decreased. Four patients reported sensory deficits after the operation, which were transient in three. In one of these patients, the first two negative potentials disappeared. In the fourth patient, who had permanent sensory deficits, the positive steep potential appeared after generation of the lesion. Our results point to the usefulness of the subpial SEPs monitoring during microneuro-surgical procedures on the spinal cord to provide further insight into evoked electrical activity of the normal and injured spinal cord, and to minimize post-operative neurological morbidity.

Spinal cord evoked injury potentials in patients with acute spinal cord injury

Six patients were examined in the acute stage of spinal cord injury, between 11 h and 12 days posttrauma. Quadripolar epidural electrodes were positioned either percutaneously using a Tuohy needle or directly into the epidural space during surgical intervention. These electrodes were combined with a common reference to obtain monopolar recordings of spinal cord evoked potentials resulting from either median nerve stimulation at the wrist or tibial nerve stimulation at the popliteal fossa. Spinal cord evoked injury potentials (SCEIPs), stationary potentials with positive polarity on the distal aspect of the lesion and negative polarity on the proximal aspect, were recorded in all cases. The average amplitude (n = 3) of the SCEIP resulting from tibial nerve stimulation as measured across the lesion was 13.5 microV with an average duration of 12.7 msec. For median nerve stimulation, the average amplitude (n = 3) of the SCEIP was 16.3 microV with an average duration of 6.7 msec. There was a change in polarity in all cases over a distance of less than 6 mm, the distance between the electrode contacts on the epidural electrode. In one case, recordings were performed initially at 11 h and repeated at 21 days posttrauma. In the latter recording, the SCEIP was still present but was five times smaller in amplitude. Coincidentally, the patient also showed clinical signs of improvement in sensory and motor spinal cord function. This study demonstrates the feasibility of recording the SCEIP in patients with acute spinal cord injury, describes the features of these SCEIPs, discusses their origins, and explores the utility of recording the SCEIP as an aid in determining the severity of the injury as well as a means of monitoring changes in spinal cord function.

Lumbar radiculopathy after spinal fusion for scoliosis

In 184 patients with no preoperative neurologic deficit who underwent operation for idiopathic scoliosis, somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was used. Four patients had neurologic deficits postoperatively. Two patients developed mild signs of intraspinal lesions involving upper motor neurons at high lumbar levels that resolved over 3-5 months. These patients and two others developed evidence of unilateral, moderate, lower motor neuron damage that was confirmed on electromyography. No changes in somatosensory evoked potentials occurred in these patients. Lumbar root damage may be difficult to recognize after operation and should be considered in patients with neurologic deficit after scoliosis surgery.

Effects of halothane dose and stimulus rate on canine spinal, far-field and near-field somatosensory evoked potentials

Evidence that canine spinal, far-field and near-field somatosensory evoked potentials resemble those recorded in humans and other species has been presented, and the vulnerability of each component to varying depths of halothane anesthesia is reported. Lumbar spinal peak latencies are not affected by halothane dose, but the negative peak is significantly prolonged by rapid rates of stimulation. Elevated stimulus rates and halothane doses reduce lumbar spinal cord potential amplitudes. Early far-field cephalic components are refractory to halothane. Late far-field components and near-field cortical potentials are substantially altered by increments in halothane dose. Both near-field and far-field responses are more readily identified in vertex-neck than vertex-brow derivations. Early far-field somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from vertex to neck, together with lumbar spinal cord potentials, may be the preferred monitoring technique when the use of halothane anesthesia is desired. Rapid rates of stimulation may facilitate earlier recognition of cord dysfunction, but supplement rather than replace baseline recordings at slow stimulus rates.

Thoracic aortic occlusion: somatosensory evoked potential monitoring and neurologic outcome in a canine model

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were monitored in 17 canines during spinal cord ischemia induced by balloon occlusion of the thoracic aorta. Graded distal aortic hypotension to 40 mmHg in seven animals had no significant effect upon the evoked potential. A significant alteration in the SEP did result in 21 +/- 9.8 minutes when distal aortic pressures were reduced in a graded fashion below 30 mmHg. Acute occlusion of the thoracic aorta (10 animals, distal pressure 15-25 mmHg) was associated with a change in the SEP in 8.4 +/- 4.3 minutes. Continuation of aortic occlusion for 30 minutes beyond an evoked potential change resulted in a moderate to severe motor deficit in all cases. Somatosensory evoked potentials obtained 72-96 hours after the ischemic injury were closely correlated with sensory deficits, but were not predictive of motor examination. Histologic examination of the spinal cords demonstrated central gray necrosis of the lumbar region in all animals with a severe deficit, and a variable degree of neuronal loss in the intermediate and dorsal gray matter zones in animals with moderate deficits. This balloon occlusion method is relevant as a model of spinal cord injury during aortic occlusion, such as may occur during aortic surgery.

Conduction characteristics of somatosensory evoked potentials to peroneal, tibial and sural nerve stimulation in man

Lumbar spine and scalp short latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) to stimulation of the posterior tibial, peroneal and sural nerves at the ankle (PTN-A, PN-A, SN-A) and common peroneal nerve at the knee (CPN-K) were obtained in 8 normal subjects. Peripheral nerve conduction velocities and lumbar spine to cerebral cortex propagation velocities were determined and compared. These values were similar with stimulation of the 3 nerves at the ankle but were significantly greater with CPN-K stimulation. CPN-K and PTN-A SSEPs were recorded from the L3, T12, T6 and C7 spines and the scalp in 6 normal subjects. Conduction velocities were determined over peripheral nerve-cauda equina (stimulus-L3), caudal spinal cord (T12-T6) and rostral spinal cord (T6-C7). Propagation velocities were determined from each spinal level to the cerebral cortex. With both CPN-K and PTN-A stimulation the speed of conduction over peripheral nerve and spinal cord was non-linear. It was greater over peripheral nerve-cauda equina and rostral spinal cord than over caudal cord segments. The CPN-K response was conducted significantly faster than the PTN-A response over peripheral nerve-cauda equina and rostral spinal cord but these values were similar over caudal cord. Spine to cerebral cortex propagation velocities were significantly greater from all spine levels with CPN-K stimulation. These data show that the conduction characteristics of SSEPs over peripheral nerve, spinal cord and from spine to cerebral cortex are dependent on the peripheral nerve stimulated.

Recording of spinal somatosensory evoked potentials for intraoperative spinal cord monitoring

The authors' experience with intradural and epidural recording of spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP's) during 26 cases of spinal surgery is described. The techniques of monitoring spinal cord function provided good quality SSEP waveforms in patients both with and without neurological deficits. The SSEP configuration and peak latencies remained stable for up to 5 hours during anesthesia with nitrous oxide, halothane, and fentanyl. Patterns of baseline SSEP's were characteristic of different spinal segments. Distortion and asymmetry of these baseline patterns were seen in several patients with spinal neoplasms. Loss of waveform components during surgery occurred with profound hypotension, overdistraction of the vertebral axis, dorsal midline myelotomy, and removal of intramedullary tumors. Persistent loss of waveform components was associated with an acquired neurological deficit. Fluctuations in the amplitude of the SSEP's were common but were not associated with postoperative neurological deficits. Spinal cord monitoring by means of SSEP recording would appear to be useful during extradural spinal surgery, but there are limitations associated with this technique during some types of intradural surgery.

Neuromonitoring

Neuromonitoring--the continuous or intermittent observation of nervous system functions--has become a field of interdisciplinary interest. Basically there are two major applications of neuromonitoring: in the operating theatre and the neurological or neurosurgical intensive care unit. Evoked potential recording, intracranial pressure measurement, serial EEG recording, cerebral blood flow measurement and ultrasound techniques have all been used as monitoring methods. The application of these techniques for operations, intensive care and the evaluation of brain death will be described.

Intraoperative evoked potentials recorded in man directly from dorsal roots and spinal cord

Direct spinal cord surface recordings of evoked spinal cord potentials have been made in 26 patients during neurosurgical procedures for intractable pain. Monopolar recordings at the dorsal root entry zone after peripheral nerve stimulation have been made at multiple levels for segmental localization and to monitor the state of the afferent path and dorsal horn. Dorsal root and dorsal column conduction has been tested on diseased and intact sides. Normal afferent conduction velocity was found to have an overall mean of 61.33 m/sec for cervicothoracic and lumbosacral peripheral nerves, and 50 m/sec for the dorsal columns. The normal mean amplitude for the slow negative wave (N1) recorded at the root entry was 52.54 muV, while that for the dorsal column conducted response recorded within 4 cm of the stimulus point on the dorsal columns was 347.5 muV. Several different placements of stimulating and recording electrodes are described, as well as their application. An interpretation of the resulting data is proposed.

Intraoperative evoked potential monitoring of the spinal cord: enhanced stability of cortical recordings

Intraoperative EP monitoring of spinal cord function depends upon a quickly obtained, reproducible EP. The records must be obtained in a hostile environment where artifacts and other sources of electrical noise cannot easily be eliminated: records are obtained continuously without interrupting the surgery. We studied EP reproducibility by measuring cortical EP amplitude range and latency range within individual patients. Reproducibility was enhanced by several changes in the stimulus and recording parameters: (1) Bipolar recording near the vertex (Cz-Pz, E1-E2) eliminated a significant amount of the artifacts and random variations seen in referential recordings. Bipolar recordings sacrifice some amplitude but the improved reproducibility is worthwhile. (2) Restricted filters (especially 30-3000 Hz) improve reproducibility still further, compared to the traditional open filters (1-1000 Hz). (3) Fast stimulation rates improve monitoring up to rates of about 5 stimuli/sec. At even faster rates too much amplitude attenuation usually occurs. Using these techniques stable intraoperative EPs were recorded from all 115 patients except those in whom EPs were abnormal even before surgery. Advantages and disadvantages compared to epidural recording techniques were discussed. Several further observations were made, including (1) monitoring could be done equally as well with stimulation either at the peroneal or at the posterior tibial nerve; (2) balanced nitrous oxide and narcotic anesthesia did attenuate EPs by about 60%, although this is not so much as to interfere seriously with monitoring.

Percutaneous flexible bipolar epidural neuroelectrode for spinal cord stimulation. Technical note

This article describes a new flexible bipolar neuroelectrode which is inserted percutaneously into the epidural space for segmental spinal cord stimulation. This electrode was used in experiments with dogs and monkeys for recording cortical somatosensory evoked potentials in order to identify intraoperative spinal cord ischemia during periods of aortic occlusion.

Somatosensory evoked potentials during spinal angiography and therapeutic transvascular embolization

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP's) were monitored during 42 angiographic examinations and 33 therapeutic embolization procedures in 41 patients. The SEP amplitude decreased in 36 of the 42 angiographic techniques, but recovered to baseline within 2 to 4 minutes in all but one case. Angiographic opacification of the anterior spinal artery reduced SEP amplitude in all but two patients, who had lost their proprioceptive sense and had no recognizable SEP prior to the procedure. No neurological complications resulted from any of the angiography procedures. Of the 33 embolizations, 15 were performed in 12 patients with arteriovenous malformations (AVM's) and 18 in 17 patients with spinal canal tumors. There was only one complication associated with embolization: that occurred in a patient with an intramedullary spinal cord AVM. Monitoring SEP amplitude in this series of patients provided a means of rapidly and reliably identifying the anterior spinal artery, served to assess the potential risk of contemplated steps in embolization, and aided in the execution of the angiographic procedures.

Spinal cord monitoring during surgery by direct recording of somatosensory evoked potentials. Technical note

A simple method of spinal cord monitoring that can be readily used during surgery for spinal disorders in children or adults is described. A spinal subdural recording electrode is placed rostral to the site of surgery and the peroneal nerve is stimulated in the popliteal fossa; in this way, large-amplitude polyphasic spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP's) can be directly recorded. The large amplitude of the spinal SEP's recorded intrathecally facilitates spinal cord monitoring by allowing: 1) rapid acquisition of the evoked response, which provides continuous monitoring during surgery; 2) relatively easy interpretation of the signal, there being no significant ultrashort- or long-latency components to the waveform; and 3) signal acquisition in an electrical environment that would be unacceptable using standard methods of spinal and cortical SEP recording.

Spinal and far-field components of human somatosensory evoked potentials to posterior tibial nerve stimulation analysed with oesophageal derivations and non-cephalic reference recording

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were elicited by stimulation of the right posterior tibial nerve at the ankle in 20 experiments on 18 normal adults. A non-cephalic reference on the left knee was used throughout (with triggering of averaging cycles from the ECG), except for recording the peripheral nerve potentials. The responses were recorded along the spine, from oesophageal probes and from the scalp. The peripheral nerve volley propagated at a mean maximum conduction velocity (CV) of 59.2 m/sec served to identify the spinal entry time (mean 19.7 msec) at spinal segments S1-S3, under the D12 spine. This entry time coincided with the onset of the N21 component which was interpreted as the dorsal column volley and considered equivalent to the neck N11 of the median nerve SEP. The large voltage of the spinal response at the D12 spine probably results from summation of N21 with a fixed latency N24 potential that phase reverses at oesophageal recording sites into a P24. The N24-P24 reflects a horizontal dipole in the dorsal horn and is equivalent to the N13-P13 of the neck SEP to median nerve stimulation. Spinal conduction between D12-C7 spines was spuriously overestimated because the true length of the dorsal spinal cord is shorter by about 13% than the distance measured on the skin over the dorsal convexity. This correction should be applied routinely and it leads to a mean maximum spinal CV of 57 m/sec. Several positive far fields with widespread scalp distribution and stationary latencies have been identified. The P17 (over spine and head) reflects the peripheral nerve volley at the upper buttock. The P21 is synchronous with the N21 at the D12 spine and reflects the initial volley in the dorsal column. No far-field equivalent has been found for the N24-P24, due to the horizontal axis of the corresponding dipole. The P26 far field reflects the ascending volley at spinal levels D10-D4. The P31 reflects the initial volley in the medial lemniscus. The P40 at Cz represents the cortical response of the foot projection. Average central CVs were calculated and discussed.

Conducted somatosensory evoked potentials during spinal surgery. Part 2: clinical applications

In 27 patients undergoing laminectomy, spinal cord function was monitored by epidural bipolar recordings of conducted spinal somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP's) across the laminectomy site, with calculation of spinal conduction velocity (CV). In control cases without myelopathy, the CV remained relatively constant (+/- 3%) even during prolonged operations, despite markedly changing levels of anesthesia. Acute CV changes were detected intraoperatively in three cases: these patients displayed improvement after extramedullary (Case 1) and intramedullary decompression (Case 2), and deterioration after direct unilateral dorsal column injury (Case 3). These intraoperative CV alterations correlated postoperatively with changes in the neurological examination. Although a unilateral lesion confined to the dorsal column abolished the ipsilateral SEP in Case 3, complete anterior quadrant lesions did not consistently change the CV (Case 4). This further suggests that the SEP is generated entirely by ipsilateral dorsal column activation. Accurate measurement of this dorsal column conduction velocity across the operative field provides a very sensitive means of monitoring spinal cord function during operations for neurosurgical spinal lesions.