Tandem lumbar and cervical spinal stenosis. Natural history, prognostic indices, and results after surgical decompression

Development of a comprehensive treatment algorithm for tandem spinal stenosis: decision making and surgical strategy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) can present with a constellation of myriad neurological symptoms and signs. Whole spine MRI has improved the diagnosis but does not aid therapeutic decision-making. While most studies have focused on cervico-lumbar TSS, there is inadequate literature on TSS of other regions. Further, there are no guidelines on the optimal surgical strategy for patients with TSS.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data PURPOSE: To develop a clinico-radiological treatment algorithm for TSS involving all the regions of the spine PATIENT SAMPLE: About 238 patients treated for TSS with a minimum follow-up of 2 year.

METHODOLOGY

The patients were classified based on the areas of stenosis namely cervico-lumbar (Type A -186), cervico-thoracic (Type B -11), thoracolumbar (Type C -24), and cervical, thoracic & lumbar (Type D -17). The criteria for diagnosis of TSS were cord compression and T2 signal intensity changes in cervical/ thoracic regions, and/or Schiza's grade ≥C lumbar canal stenosis (LCS). In the sequence of surgical algorithm, clinical severity was taken as the prime factor followed by cord signal changes. In clinical severity, symptoms were given predominance over clinical signs, myelopathy over radiculopathy and proximal over distal compressions. The outcomes were evaluated through Nurick's grade (NG) and ODI.

RESULTS

Type A cervico-lumbar TSS was divided into four sub-types. Type A1-patients with clinical myelopathy without symptoms of LCS underwent cervical decompression alone (n=58). NG improved from 3.8±0.98 to 1.74±0.74 (p<.05). Only 11(18%) required lumbar decompression later. Patients with LCS (Type A2) without clinical myelopathy underwent lumbar decompression alone (n=97). Four (4.1%) developed myelopathy during follow-up requiring a cervical surgery. Patients with predominant LCS symptoms with only signs of myelopathy (Type A3, n=7) underwent lumbar decompression initially but all required cervical surgery within 2 years. Type A4 (n=24) with both myelopathy and claudication symptoms were treated by combined staged decompressions procedures. The NG improved from 3.4±0.7 to 1.6±0.4 (p<.05). Type B (n=11) had patients with myelopathy due to compression at cervical and thoracic regions. They were sub-divided based on upper limb myelopathy. In patients with both upper and lower limb myelopathy (Type B1, n=11), cervical decompression was done first (n=6) followed by staged thoracic decompression. The NG improved from 4.6±0.5 to 1.8±0.3 (p<.05). In patients with predominant lower limb myelopathy (Type B2, n=5), only thoracic surgery was performed. Only one required cervical surgery later. In Type C thoracic & lumbar TSS (n=24), 20 were treated by thoracic decompression based on signs of myelopathy. The mean NG improved from 4.1±0.7 to 1.9±0.9 (p<.05). Six cases required lumbar level surgery later. Four patients who had only LCS symptoms underwent lumbar decompression. Type D with stenosis at all three regions presented variedly, and underwent staged decompression (n=17).

CONCLUSION

Based on clinical features of myelopathy and claudication, along with specific diagnostic MRI criteria, the present study comprehensively classified all possible types of TSS. The algorithm provides specific surgical strategies for each subtype, based on a large cohort of patients. More than MRI evidence of stenosis and signal changes, clinical symptoms and signs were helpful in formulating treatment.

A Rare Case of Bilateral Foot Drop Following Cervical Decompression in Tandem Spinal Stenosis

This case report describes a 70-year-old male presenting with limb weakness, urinary retention and tandem cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis with complicating white cord syndrome, a rare reperfusion injury post decompression surgery. Initially admitted following an unwitnessed fall, the patient's neurological examination indicated that progressive weakness of the limbs and sensory loss etiology is cervical and lumbar spondylosis with severe spinal canal stenosis, confirmed by imaging. Due to rapid deterioration, he underwent C5 corpectomy, cervical decompression and fusion. Informed consent for surgery was obtained from the patient. Post-surgery, he experienced transient improvements but soon developed delirium, worsening right-sided weakness, and bilateral foot drop. Diagnosis of white cord syndrome was made because of repeat cervical MRI findings having signal changes in cervical spine. Subsequent treatment included intravenous steroids, antibiotics, and eventual lumbar interbody fusion. The multifactorial nature of his postoperative complications including hyperactive delirium and urinary tract infection, underscores the complexities associated with tandem stenosis and white cord syndrome management. The case highlights the need for early intervention in tandem spinal stenosis cases, cautious intraoperative monitoring, and risk factors management for reperfusion injury, stressing the role of comprehensive postoperative care to improve functional outcomes.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications of Simultaneous versus Staged Surgical Decompression for Tandem Spinal Stenosis

Introduction  Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) refers to the narrowing of the spinal canal at two distinct anatomic areas. Symptoms can present due to either cervical myelopathy or lumbar stenosis. Consequently, determining the symptomatic anatomical levels requiring surgery can pose a challenge. We sought to identify the surgical approach associated with better patient-reported outcomes. Materials and Methods  The Information Management System was queried using the International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Edition codes to identify patients who underwent simultaneous or staged decompression surgery for TSS between 2011 and 2020. Patient records were reviewed to collect data on age, sex, comorbidities, surgical approach, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score, and complications. The mJOA is a validated composite assessment used to quantify postoperative neurological status. Multivariable regression models were utilized to identify factors associated with better postoperative neurological recovery. Results  Among 42 patients included in the analytical cohort, 33 (78.6%) underwent simultaneous cervical and lumbar decompression, while 9 (21.4%) underwent staged decompression (cervical followed by lumbar). The patient's age, sex, comorbid conditions, and American Society of Anesthesiologists level were similar between the two groups. Furthermore, simultaneous decompression was associated with higher blood loss (676.97 vs. 584.44 mL) and an increased need for transfusion (259.09 vs. 111.11 mL) compared with staged decompression. Moreover, patients who underwent simultaneous decompression experienced a higher number of postoperative complications (10 vs. 1; p  = 0.024). Notably, postoperative mJOA scores improved in both groups; however, the improvement was more pronounced in the staged group (mJOA score: 15.16% [ ± 2.18] vs. 16.56% [ ± 1.59]). On follow-up visits, patients who underwent staged decompression showed better recovery rates (mJOA score: 78.20% [ ± 24.45] vs. 59.75% [ ± 25.05]). Conclusion  The patient's clinical history and examination findings should be the main determinants of surgical decision-making. Our study showed a slightly higher postoperative mJOA score and a recovery rate with fewer complications in staged decompression of TSS.

Tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is a condition characterized by the narrowing of the spinal canal in multiple segments of the spine. Predominantly observed in the cervical and lumbar regions, TSS also manifests in the conjunction of the cervical and thoracic spine. The simultaneous occurrence of cervical and thoracic spinal stenosis engenders intricate symptoms, potentially leading to missed and delayed diagnosis. Furthermore, the presence of tandem cervical and thoracic stenosis (TCTS) introduces a notable impact on the decision-making calculus of surgeons when contemplating either one-staged or two-staged surgery. Currently, there is no agreed-upon strategy for surgical intervention of TCTS in the literature.

METHODS

Medical databases in English (Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and Chinese (CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP CMJD) were searched using Medical Subject Heading queries for the terms "tandem cervical and thoracic stenosis", "cervical stenosis AND thoracic stenosis", "tandem spinal stenosis" and "concomitant spinal stenosis" from January 1980 to March 2023. We included studies involving adult individuals with TCTS. Articles exclusively focused on disorders within a single spine region or devoid of any mention of spinal disorders were excluded.

RESULTS

Initially, a total of 1625 literatures underwent consideration for inclusion in the study. Following the elimination of the duplicates through the utilization of EndNote, and a meticulous screening process involving scrutiny of abstracts and full-texts, 23 clinical studies met the predefined inclusion criteria. Of these, 2 studies solely focused on missed diagnosis, 19 studies exclusively discussed surgical strategy for TCTS, and 2 articles evaluated both surgical strategy and missed diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed a missed diagnosis rate of 7.2% in TCTS, with the thoracic stenosis emerging as the predominant area susceptible to oversight. Therefore, the meticulous identification of TCTS assumes paramount significance as the inaugural step in its effective management. While both one-staged and two-staged surgeries have exhibited efficacy in addressing TCTS, the selection of the optimal surgical plan should be contingent upon the individualized circumstances of the patients.

The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Cervical Spinal Cord Compression in Individuals Presenting With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of asymptomatic cervical spinal cord compression (CSCC) in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

METHODS

A systematic electronic search was conducted in Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science without language restriction, with no starting date limit to June 8, 2023, to define the prevalence of asymptomatic CSCC in symptomatic LSS patients. Asymptomatic CSCC was defined based on radiographic studies. All types of studies were included in the review. Meta-analysis was performed on the reported prevalence of asymptomatic CSCC in LSS.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 10,272 articles. After a full-text review, five studies were included in the final review, comprising a total of 1043 cases. Two studies had a low risk for bias, two moderate, and one estimated to be high risk. The range of prevalence of asymptomatic CSCC in LSS in the five included studies was between 24% and 61%. Meta-analysis on the reported prevalence of asymptomatic CSCC patients with symptomatic LSS demonstrated that the random pooled prevalence was 35% (95% CI: 23 to 48).

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic CSCC appears to occur in a high number of patients, with this study noting its presence in one-third of patients with LSS. Based on these findings, we strongly recommend that spine surgeons exercise particular caution during the positioning of patients who are undergoing surgery for lumbar stenosis. Furthermore, it is imperative to monitor individuals with symptomatic LSS closely for any potential signs of emerging myelopathy.

Three region spinal decompression in the same session: a case report

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Multiregional spinal stenosis [tandem spinal stenosis (TSS)] is not rare but operating on multiple regions at the same sitting is. Decompression of cervical and lumbar spine in the same session has a frequency of 5-25% all TSS cases, the most frequent one is TSS. Decompression in three different regions is so rare that there is only one case in the literature. We report the second.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

A 72-year-old man with pain in legs and arms, neurogenic claudication, progressive loss of balance, radiculopathy and myelopathy in lower and upper extremities whose cervical-thoracic and lumbar spinal stenosis were treated with decompressive surgery in the same session. Total time of surgery for three regions was 330 min. No complications were observed. The patient was mobilized on day 1 postoperative and was discharged from the hospital on day 3. By month 3, motor function had improved almost completely, and pyramidal findings have decreased.

CONCLUSION

Multiregional spinal stenosis of three spinal regions at the same time is a rare case and these cases, surgery of three regions can be carried out in the same session respectively.

Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials rescue from postoperative neurological deficit due to inadequate neck position for the case of lumbar surgery with asymptomatic cervical stenosis

PURPOSE

Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) are an intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring method that reduces adverse outcomes in various spine surgeries. Although spine surgeons rarely use TES-MEPs for simple lumbar decompression surgery, we herein firstly report the efficacy of TES-MEPs for lumbar spinal canal stenosis with asymptomatic coexisting cervical canal stenosis.

METHODS

We report the case of a 71-year-old man who underwent lumbar decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. He had asymptomatic cervical spinal canal stenosis before surgery.

RESULTS

TES-MEPs showed apparent derivation failure of wave amplitudes from the upper and lower limb muscles immediately after posture change from supine to prone for operative preparation. The cervical alignment was corrected. Subsequently, the TES-MEP wave amplitudes became derivable immediately.

CONCLUSIONS

While TES-MEPs can be used to prevent neurological deficits in lumbar spine surgery, it can also be used to indirectly monitor other spinal lesions. Based on our experience, we recommend using TES-MEPs even in lumbar spine surgery.

Outcomes in surgical treatment for tandem spinal stenosis: systematic literature review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) refers to a narrowing of the spinal canal in distinct, noncontiguous regions. TSS most commonly occurs in the cervical and lumbar regions. Decompressive surgery is indicated for those with cervical myelopathy or persistent symptoms from lumbar stenosis despite conservative management. Surgical management typically involves staged procedures, with cervical decompression taking precedence in most cases, followed by lumbar decompression at a later time. However, several studies have shown favorable outcomes in simultaneous decompression.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to provide a literature review and compare surgical outcomes in patients undergoing staged vs simultaneous surgery for TSS.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Systematic literature review.

METHODS

A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines to identify original research articles for tandem spinal stenosis. PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science were used for electronic literature search. Original articles from 2005 to 2021 with more than eight adult patients treated surgically for cervical and lumbar TSS in staged or simultaneous procedures were included. Articles including pediatric patients, primarily thoracic stenosis, stenosis secondary to neoplasm or infectious disease, minimally invasive surgery, and non-English language were excluded. Demographic, perioperative, complications, functional outcome, and neurologic outcome data including mJOA (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association), Nurick grade (NG), and ODI (Oswestry disability index), were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 667 articles were initially identified. After preliminary screening, 21 articles underwent full-text screening. Ten articles met our inclusion criteria. A total of 831 patients were included, 571 (68%) of them underwent staged procedures, and 260 (32%) underwent simultaneous procedures for TSS. Mean follow-ups ranged from 12 to 85 months. There was no difference in estimated blood loss (EBL) between staged and simultaneous groups (p=.639). Simultaneous surgeries had shorter surgical time than staged surgeries (p<.001). Mean changes in mJOA, NG, and ODI was comparable between staged and simultaneous groups. Complications were similar between the groups. There were more major complications reported in simultaneous operations, although this was not statistically significant (p=.301).

CONCLUSION

Staged and simultaneous surgery for TSS have comparable perioperative, functional, and neurologic outcomes, as well as complication rates. Careful selection of candidates for simultaneous surgery may reduce the length of stay and consolidate rehabilitation, thereby reducing hospital-associated costs.

Current understanding of tandem spinal stenosis: epidemiology, diagnosis, and surgical strategy

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is defined as the concomitant occurrence of stenosis in at least two or more distinct regions (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar) of the spine and may present with a constellation of signs and symptoms. It has four subtypes, including cervico-lumbar, cervico-thoracic, thoraco-lumbar, and cervico-thoraco-lumbar TSS. The prevalence of TSS varies depending on the different subtypes and cohorts.

The main aetiologies of TSS are spinal degenerative changes and heterotopic ossification, and patients with developmental spinal stenosis, ligament ossification, and spinal stenosis at any region are at an increased risk of developing TSS.

The diagnosis of TSS is challenging. The clinical presentation of TSS could be complex, concealed, or severe, and these features may be confusing to clinicians, resulting in an incomplete or delayed diagnosis. Additionally, a consolidated diagnostic criterion for TSS is urgently required to improve consistency across studies and form a basis for establishing treatment guidelines.

The optimal treatment option for TSS is still under debate; areas of controversies include choice of the decompression range, choice between simultaneous or staged surgical patterns, and the order of the surgeries.

The present study reviews publications on TSS, consolidates current awareness on prevalence, aetiologies, potential risk factors, diagnostic dilemmas and criteria, and surgical strategies based on TSS subtypes. This is the first review to include thoracic spinal stenosis as a candidate disorder in TSS and aims at providing the readers with a comprehensive overview of TSS.

Simultaneous decompression of all stenotic regions versus decompression of only the most symptomatic region in patients with tandem spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Selection of anatomic region of spine for decompression in patients with symptomatic tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) remains a challenge due to the confusing clinical presentation as well as uncertain evidence. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies were conducted to compare the outcomes between simultaneous decompression of all stenotic regions (cervical and lumbar, Group 1) and decompression of only the most symptomatic stenotic region (cervical/lumbar, Group 2) in patients with TSS.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, and a comprehensive literature search with well-established inclusion and exclusion criteria with JOA score as an outcome measure was done on PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE database (till January 2021). Observational studies reporting outcomes after simultaneous decompression or only the most symptomatic region were included. NIH quality assessment tool was used to check the quality of each study, and treatment effects were calculated using Dersimonian and Laird random effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the analysis out of which all were retrospective observational studies (Level 4 evidence) except one (Level 3 evidence). Overall proportional meta-analysis showed no significant difference in change in JOA scores, operative time, blood loss, total and major complications between Group 1 and Group 2. However, minor complications were significantly increased on performing decompression of both regions simultaneously (p = 0.04). On performing subgroup analysis comparing cervical surgery cohort with lumbar surgery cohort, no difference was found in change in JOA score and requirement of second-stage surgery.

CONCLUSION

Decompression of the most symptomatic region alone irrespective of its location has equal clinical outcomes with less complication rate than simultaneous decompression in patients with TSS.

Single-Site Retrospective Assessment of Surgical Outcomes in Non-Ambulatory Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).

OBJECTIVE

To better characterize outcomes following cervical decompression in those with severe, non-ambulatory forms of DCM.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

DCM represents a collection of age-related degenerative processes of the cervical spine that can result in motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction, leading to significant reductions in quality of life. Individuals with severe, non-ambulatory forms of DCM are often treated with spinal decompression although the extent of neurological improvement for this patient population is unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 48 non-consecutive non-ambulatory patients who underwent cervical decompression surgery between January 2007 and December 2018. Paired t tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare Nurick grade and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score before and after surgery. Patient demographics, operative details, and postsurgical complications were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Patients experienced significant improvements in both Nurick grade and mJOA score following cervical decompression surgery. The mean Nurick grade improved from 4.10 ± 0.31 to 2.21 ± 0.82 (P < 0.001, paired t test; 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.08 to -1.71), while the mean mJOA score improved from 10.58 ± 1.51 to 13.60 ± 1.58 (P < 0.001, paired t test; 95% CI 2.59-3.45). The average follow-up duration was 2.50 ± 1.83 years. Following surgery, 44 of the 48 patients in the study gained the ability to ambulate without the aid of a walking frame or someone else's assistance.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that patients with severe forms of DCM experienced significant improvement in neurological function following cervical decompression surgery. These improvements indicate that cervical decompression surgery is effective in this patient population and has the potential to improve neurological status.Level of Evidence: 3.

The value of cervical MRI in surgical lumbar canal stenosis patients

Background

The prevalence of cervical canal stenosis alone is estimated to be present in 4.9% of the adult population. Co-existence of dual pathology may complicate clinical presentation and necessitates a wise and individually based decision process.

Objectives

To estimate the co-existence of cervical canal stenosis in surgical lumbar canal stenosis patients and its reflection on decision-making regarding surgery.

Methods

It is a prospective study that was conducted on 70 cases with symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis by investigating them for cervical canal stenosis clinically and radiologically.

Results

The co-existence of cervical and lumbar canal stenoses was seen in 62 cases (88.57%); cases with relative cervical stenosis were 25 (35.714%) and absolute cervical stenosis was 37 (52.857%). Cases with no cervical stenosis were 8 (11.428%) and cases with relative lumbar stenosis were 22 (31.428%), while cases with absolute lumbar stenosis were 48 (68.571%). Cases with symptomatic cervical canal stenosis were 30 (42.857%). Cases with asymptomtic cervical canal stenosis were 32 (45.71%).

Conclusion

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is not uncommon and MRI cervical spine should be done for every lumbar canal stenosis patient especially if indicated by history or clinical examination.

Extent and characteristic of relationships in canal dimension and canal body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine

A known prevalence of concurrent cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis was shown to be 5–25%, but there is a lack of evidence regarding direct relationships in canal dimension and canal-body ratio between cervical and lumbar spine. Total 247 patients (mean age: 61 years, male: 135) with cervical and lumbar computed tomography scans were retrospectively reviewed. Midsagittal vertebral body and canal diameters in reconstructed images were measured at all cervical and lumbar vertebrae, and canal-body ratios were calculated. The canal diameter and ratio were also compared according to the gender and age, and correlation analysis was performed for each value. There were significant correlations between cervical (C3–C7) and lumbar (L1–L5) canal dimension (p < 0.001). C5 canal diameter was most significantly correlated with L4 canal diameter (r = 0.435, p < 0.001). Cervical canal-body ratios (C3–C7) were also correlated with those of lumbar spine (L1–L5) (p < 0.001). The canal-body ratio of C3 was most highly correlated with L3 (r = 0.477, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, mean canal-body ratios of C3 and L3 were significantly smaller in male patients than female (p = 0.038 and p < 0.001) and patient’s age was inversely correlated with C5 canal diameter (r = − 0.223, p < 0.001) and C3 canal-body ratio (r = − 0.224, p < 0.001). Spinal canal dimension and canal-body ratio have moderate degrees of correlations between cervical and lumbar spine and the elderly male patients show the tendency of small canal diameter and canal-body ratio. This relationship of cervical and lumbar spine can be an important evidence to explain to the patients.

Simultaneous or Staged Decompressions for Patients with Tandem Spinal Stenosis

Objective

To compare the clinical effects of cervical decompression first, lumbar decompression first, or simultaneous decompression of both lesions in the treatment of tandem spinal stenosis (TSS).

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis. From January 2013 to December 2018, 51 TSS patients underwent our surgery and postoperative investigation. Among the 51 subjects, 27 females and 24 males, aged 49–77 years with an average age of 66.3 ± 6.8, were selected. According to the different operation sequences, all patients were divided into three groups. In simultaneous operation group, five patients underwent cervical and lumbar vertebrae surgery at the same time. In first cervical surgery group, 28 patients underwent cervical vertebra surgery first, followed by lumbar spine surgery after a period of recovery. And in first lumbar surgery group, 18 patients underwent lumbar vertebrae surgery first. The choice for neck surgery is posterior cervical single‐door vertebroplasty, the surgery of lumber is plate excision and decompression needle‐rod system internal fixation. The outcome measures are visual analogue scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association cervical (JOA‐C) and lumbar (JOA‐L) scores, which were assessed at 3 months and 1 year after the operation by telephone interview. In addition, operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were also recorded.

Results

All the patients in the study had surgery performed successfully by the same group of orthopaedic surgeons. The preoperative VAS scores of simultaneous operation group, first cervical surgery group, and first lumbar surgery group were 8.00 ± 1.00, 8.36 ± 0.68, and 8.17 ± 0.71 (P > 0.05). The preoperative JOA‐C scores were 7.00 ± 2.35, 6.54 ± 1.53, and 7.83 ± 1.04 (P < 0.05). And the preoperative JOA‐L scores were 7.20 ± 2.17, 4.64 ± 2.36, and 5.78 ± 1.22 respectively (P < 0.05). During the final 1‐year follow‐up, the JOA‐C improvement rates of simultaneous operation group, first cervical surgery group, and first lumbar surgery group were 85.68% ± 5.44%, 84.27% ± 5.02%, and 83.34% ± 10.25%, respectively (P > 0.05), and the JOA‐L improvement rates were 80.04% ± 3.35%, 81.65% ± 3.74%, and 80.21% ± 4.76% (P > 0.05). The difference among them was not statistically significant. In addition, operation time (OP), blood loss (BL), and hospital stay (HS) in the simultaneous operation group were 245.00 ± 5.00 min, 480.00 ± 27.39 mL, and 16.60 ± 0.55 days, respectively. While those parameters in the first cervical surgery group were 342.50 ± 18.18 min, 528.21 ± 43.97 mL, and 22.75 ± 2.15 days, and in the first lumbar surgery group they were 346.11 ± 24.77 min, 519.44 ± 43.99 mL, and 22.89 ± 1.64 days. The average blood loss in simultaneous operation group was less (P > 0.05); meanwhile, the operation time and hospital stay time were significantly shorter in the simultaneous operation group than in the first cervical surgery group and first lumbar surgery group (P < 0.05). Only one case of fat liquefaction occurred in first cervical surgery group, which healed spontaneously after a regular change of dressing for 1 month.

Conclusions

Under the condition of ensuring the surgical effect, the choice of staged surgery or concurrent surgery according to the patients' own symptoms of cervical and lumbar symptoms could both obtain satisfactory results, and the damage of simultaneous surgery was less than that of staged surgery.

Simultaneous or staged operation for tandem spinal stenosis: surgical strategy and efficacy comparison

Background

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) has a complex clinical presentation, and there is no consensus on the optimal surgical strategy. This study retrospectively compared the efficacy of different staged operations and simultaneous decompression for patients with TSS.

Methods

We reviewed data from 132 patients with TSS who received surgical procedures from January 2011 to June 2018. Patients were classified into three groups according to the most symptomatic area of compression (group C: first-stage surgery for cervical compression; group L: first-stage surgery for lumbar compression; group CL: simultaneous surgery for both). Medical records were reviewed for age, gender, comorbidities, operation time, combined estimated blood loss, and time of hospitalization. The JOA-C, JOA-L, NDI, and ODI scores, and complications were also examined.

Results

Postoperative outcomes were followed for 32.1 ± 5.4 months. There were significant differences in the re-operation rate and the interval time between the two types of staged operations (p = 0.005 and p = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in gender (p = 0.639), operation time (p = 0.138), combined estimated blood loss (p = 0.116), or complications (p = 0.652) among the three groups, while the simultaneous group was significantly younger (p = 0.027), with fewer comorbidities (p < 0.001) and a shorter hospitalization time (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, the JOA-C and JOA-L scores were increased, while the NDI and ODI scores were decreased, compared with the preoperative scores.

Conclusions

TSS can be effectively managed by either simultaneous or staged decompressions. First-stage surgery for cervical stenosis significantly lowers the requirement for second-stage lumbar surgery. One-stage simultaneous decompression is safe and effective with the advantage of reduce hospitalization time, without an increase in operative time or bleeding. However, the surgical indications should be strictly controlled and is recommended for younger patients with fewer comorbidities.

Surgical outcomes of single stage surgery for Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) in elderly and younger patients: A comparative study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the outcomes of single stage surgery for Tandem Spinal Stenosis (TSS) in elderly (Age ≥65 years) and younger patients (Age <65 years).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Tandem spinal stenosis among elderly is common and often missed diagnosed with delayed presentation. Literature evaluating efficacy and safety of single staged surgery for TSS in elderly patients is scanty.

METHODS

Analysis of 74 patients with TSS managed with single stage posterior surgery from 2007 to 2016 was done. A total of 62 patients who satisfied our inclusion criteria were evaluated and subdivided into two groups based on age; Study group (age ≥65years)] (n = 32) and control group (age <65years) (n = 30). Perioperative, clinical/radiological parameters and postoperative complications and recovery rate were noted.

RESULTS

The Mean ODI and mJOA showed significant improvement post-operatively in both groups however there was no significant difference between the two groups at final follow-up. There was no statistical difference in operative time, blood loss and hospital stay between the groups. As per Odom's criteria, 78.1% had excellent to good results in study group, while 83.3% had excellent to good results in control group. Postoperative complications were more in elderly group however, there was no significant difference among neurological or cardiopulmonary complications between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Single stage surgery is safe & efficacious modality with less morbidity and optimal results in elderly patients with proper preoperative risk assessment. Our study showed that increased age does not proved to be deterrent in the outcome of single staged surgery in tandem spinal stenosis.

Clinical Comparison of Selective versus Nonselective Decompression for Symptomatic Tandem Stenosis of the Cervical and Thoracic Spine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present paper was to reveal the clinical differences between selective and nonselective decompression for symptomatic tandem stenosis of the cervical and thoracic spine (TSCTS).

METHODS

A total of 34 patients were eligible and included in the study. Among them, 8 patients underwent selective cervical decompression (CD), 15 patients underwent selective thoracic decompression (TD), and 11 patients underwent combined CD and TD (CTD) surgery. Age, sex, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, inpatient expenditure, preoperative upper Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) rate, canal occupation rate, high-intensity T2-weighted image (T2WI) of the spinal cord, and preoperative and postoperative JOA scores were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

The CD group had shorter operative time (138.8 ± 36.1 vs 229.7 ± 95.8 vs 328.6 ± 94.8, min, P < 0.001), less intraoperative blood loss (141.3 ± 116.7 vs 496.7 ± 361.8 vs 654.6 ± 320.5, mL, P = 0.004), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.6 ± 1.6 vs 9.0 ± 3.5 vs 10.3 ± 6.6, days, P = 0.008), as well as lower preoperative upper JOA rate (34.1 ± 5.6 vs 53.9 ± 8.4 vs 48.2 ± 15.2, %, P = 0.001) than the TD and CTD groups. The CTD group had higher inpatient expenditure than the CD and TD groups (87,850 ± 18,379 vs 55,100 ± 12,890 vs 55,772 ± 15,715, CNY, P < 0.001). The cervical canal occupation rates were similar among different groups (P > 0.05); however, the TD group showed a higher thoracic canal occupation rate than the CD group (58.3 ± 14.7 vs 43.3 ± 12.3, %, P = 0.035). All positive levels in high-intensity T2WI of the spinal cord were decompressed. The preoperative JOA scores as well as the postoperative JOA scores at 6 months and at last follow-up were comparable among the three groups (P > 0.05). Similarly, the JOA recovery rate showed no significant difference among the groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Selective CD or TD alone demonstrated similar clinical effectiveness to nonselective and combined CTD for TSCTS. Individualized surgical decision should be made after meticulous assessments of clinical and radiological manifestations, general patient condition, and socioeconomic factors.

Primary cervical decompression surgery may improve lumbar symptoms in patients with tandem spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) refers to coexisting lumbar and cervical canal stenosis. Evidence regarding whether cervical decompression improves lumbar symptoms in TSS is insufficient. Therefore, we determined the effectiveness of cervical decompression surgery for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and cervical spinal stenosis.

METHODS

The records of 64 patients with TSS experiencing lumbar symptoms who underwent cervical decompression surgery between April 2013 and July 2017 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. We categorized patients into the Non-improved (n = 20), Relapsed (n = 30), and Maintained-improvement (n = 14) groups according to the presence or absence of improvement and relapse in lower limb symptoms in TSS following cervical decompression surgeries.

RESULTS

Of 64 patients, 44 (69%) showed improved lower limb or low back symptoms, with 14 (22%) patients maintaining improvement. The preoperative cervical myelopathy-Japanese Orthopedic Association score and the preoperative number of steps determined using the 10-s step test were significantly lower in the Non-improved group than in the Maintained-improvement group. Receiver operating characteristic curve of preoperative 10-s step test results revealed 12 steps as a predictor for maintained improvement.

CONCLUSION

The improvement of LSS symptoms following cervical decompression surgeries may be associated with the severity of cervical myelopathy as determined in clinical findings rather than in imaging findings. Patients with TSS having a 10-s step test result of < 12 steps were more likely to experience a relapse of lower limb symptoms following cervical decompression surgeries.

Long-term Outcome Following Three-Level Stand-Alone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Is Plating Necessary?

Background:

Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) is a proven method for the treatment of selected patients. The necessity of use of an anterior plate is controversial. The article aims to assess the fusion rates (FRs) and long-term outcomes following three-level ACDF.

Materials and Methods:

Data were collected from the medical records of patients operated on due to degenerative cervical disease. All patients were treated with three-level ACDF employing polyether ether-ketone cages without anterior plating. Visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), and plain radiographs were used in the clinical and radiological postsurgery assessment. Fusion evaluation was performed according to the <1 mm motion between spinous processes rule. Subsidence was defined as a more than 2 mm decrease in the interbody height.

Results:

A total of 234 treated levels on 78 patients were assessed. The mean presurgery NDI score was 23.07 ± 4.86, with a mean disability of 46.03% ± 9.64. The mean presurgery VAS score of the neck was 7.58 ± 0.85, while VAS score of the arm was 7.75 ± 1.008. Post surgery, NDI stated no disability, while VAS score of the neck and arm showed no presence of pain. The mean FR was 19.50 ± 21.71 levels per month, with a peak from 3^rd to 6^th month. Presurgery evaluation showed 12 (15.38%) patients with a high T2 sequence signal. Magnetic resonance imaging screening detected 31 (39.24%) patients with coexisting cervical and lumbar findings. Post surgery, transient dysphagia was reported by 1 patient (1.28%), while subsidence was registered in 15 (6.41%) levels, situated in 12 patients (15.38%), most often at C_6-7 (66.6%). Clinical and radiological follow-up extended to 69.47 ± 11.45 months.

Conclusion:

Multilevel stand-alone ACDF is a safe, cost-effective procedure providing favorable clinical and radiological results with minimal complications. The incidence of subsidence is usually clinically insignificant and can be decreased with a careful surgical technique.

Evaluation and Treatment of Tandem Spinal Stenosis

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) refers to simultaneous narrowing of noncontiguous regions of the spinal canal, typically the cervical and lumbar region. Symptomatic TSS may be present in more than 10% of patients presenting with spinal symptoms secondary to stenosis in any one region. Clinical presentation may present challenges because of a mixture of upper and lower motor neuron lesions that can confuse and mislead the clinician. Stenosis at another level may only be detected late, when there is failure to improve after treatment, and, if not detected, can result in either poor treatment outcomes or catastrophic complications. There is no uniform agreement in the management of TSS, and the reported surgical strategies include both simultaneous and staged approaches with each having positive and negative features. This article aims to provide the reader with details on the prevalence, evaluation, and guidance in treatment strategy for TSS.

Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Concurrent Cervical Spinal Cord Compression in Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence and predictive factors of concurrent cervical spinal cord compression (CSCC) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In patients with ASD undergoing major thoracolumbar realignment surgery, concurrent CSCC potentially increases the risk of progression of myelopathy or cervical cord injury due to various perioperative factors including poor intraoperative neck positioning and hypotension. However, the prevalence of CSCC in ASD patients has not been previously studied.

METHODS

This study included ASD patients who were indicated for major thoracolumbar corrective surgery (>5 levels). The presence of CSCC was determined using the modified Cord Compression Index (Grades 0-3) based on the cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Significant CSCC was defined as Grade>2, and the distribution of compression level as well as the number of Grade>2 segments were investigated in each patient. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of CSCC with variables being the patients' characteristics including radiographic sagittal alignment parameters.

RESULTS

Of 121 patients with ASD, 41 patients (33.8%) demonstrated significant CSCC on MRI. Intramedullary T2 hyper-intensity (myelomalacia) was present in eight patients (6.6%). Thirty-five of 41 patients were asymptomatic or with myelopathy that is difficult to detect. Significant CSCC was most commonly observed at C4/5 level. Four patients (3.3%) underwent cervical decompression and fusion prior to thoracolumbar reconstruction. Multivariate regression analysis revealed old age, increased body mass index (BMI), and PI-LL mismatch independently predicted the CSCC grade.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of concurrent significant cervical cord compression in patients with ASD is relatively high at 33.8%. Preoperative evaluation of cervical MRI and examinations for signs/symptoms of myelopathy are essential for patients with (1) older age, (2) increased BMI, and (3) high PI-LL mismatch to avoid progressive myelopathy or cord injury during ASD surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Quality of life changes after lumbar decompression in patients with tandem spinal stenosis

OBJECTIVE

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is a degenerative spinal condition characterized by spinal canal narrowing at 2 or more distinct spinal levels. It is an aging-related condition that is likely to increase as the population ages, but which remains poorly described in the literature. Here we sought to determine the impact of primary lumbar decompression on quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes in patients with symptomatic TSS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 803 patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of TSS treated between 2008 and 2014 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The records of patients with clinical and radiographic evidence of concurrent cervical and lumbar stenosis were reviewed. Prospectively gathered QOL data, including the Pain Disability Questionnaire (PDQ), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for low back pain, were assessed at the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups.

RESULTS

Of 803 identified patients (mean age 66.2 years; 46.9% male), 19.6% underwent lumbar decompression only, 14.1% underwent cervical + lumbar decompression, and 66.4% underwent conservative management only. Baseline VAS scores were similar across all groups, but patients undergoing conservative management had better baseline QOL scores on all other measures. Both surgical cohorts experienced significant improvements in the VAS, PDQ, and EQ-5D at all time points; patients in the cervical + lumbar cohort also had significant improvement in the PHQ-9. Conservatively managed patients showed no significant improvement in QOL scores at any follow-up interval.

CONCLUSION

Lumbar decompression with or without cervical decompression improves low back pain and QOL outcomes in patients with TSS. The decision to prioritize lumbar decompression is therefore unlikely to adversely affect long-term quality-of-life improvements.

Delayed Diagnosis of Tandem Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Institutional Review

Background

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is defined as simultaneous spinal stenosis in the cervical, thoracic, and/or lumbar regions and may present with both upper and lower motor neuron symptoms, neurogenic claudication, and gait disturbance. Current literature has focused mainly on the prevalence of TSS and treatment methods, while the incidence of delayed TSS diagnosis is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of delayed TSS diagnosis at our institution and describe the clinical characteristics commonly observed in their particular presentation.

Methods

Following institutional review board approval, an institutional billing database review was performed for patients who underwent a spinal decompression procedure between 2006 and 2016. Thirty-three patients who underwent decompression on 2 separate spinal regions within 1 year were included for review. Patients with delayed diagnosis of TSS following the first surgery were differentiated from those with preoperative diagnosis of TSS.

Results

TSS requiring surgical decompression occurred in 33 patients, with the incidence being 2.06% in this cohort. Fifteen patients received a delayed diagnosis after the first surgical decompression (45%) and were found to have a longer interval between decompressions (7.6 ± 2.1 months versus 4.01 ± 3 months, P = .0004). Patients undergoing lumbar decompression as the initial procedure were more likely to have a delayed diagnosis of TSS (8 versus 2 patients, P = .0200). The most common presentation of delayed TSS was pain and myelopathic symptoms that persisted after decompressive surgery.

Conclusion

TSS should remain within the differential diagnosis for patients at initial presentation of spinal stenosis. In addition, suspicion of TSS should be heightened if preoperative symptoms fail to expectedly improve following decompression even if overt myelopathic signs are not present.

Level of Evidence

4.

Cervical spine surgery for tandem spinal stenosis: The impact on low back pain

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) can present similarly to cervical myelopathy, but often has a worse prognosis. Few studies have investigated outcomes and compared treatment approaches for patients with TSS. We sought to determine the impact of cervical spine surgery on cervical and lumbar spine symptoms in patients with symptomatic tandem spinal stenosis.

PATIENTS METHODS

84 patients with TSS were identified over 5 years. 48 underwent cervical spine surgery alone, 20 underwent both cervical and lumbar spine surgery, and 16 received conservative treatment alone (conservative cohort). Quality of life (QOL) measures included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for arm, neck, and back pain, and EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). QOL data were acquired at baseline (pre-operative) and 1 year postoperatively via an institutional prospectively collected database.

RESULTS

Both surgical cohorts showed significant (p < 0.01) pre- to postoperative improvement for VAS neck and arm scores at 1-year post-op and significantly (p < 0.01) greater improvements than the conservative cohort. In addition, the cohort undergoing cervical spine surgery alone experienced significant improvement in the EQ-5D score whereas those undergoing both cervical and lumbar spine surgery did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical spine surgery with or without follow-up lumbar spine surgery significantly improves neck pain in patients with TSS. In contrast, cervical spine surgery in these patients does not improve lumbar symptoms. Lumbar surgery also did not improve low back pain or quality of life. Future prospective studies are necessary to examine the impact of lumbar decompression alone on cervical spine symptoms in patients with TSS.

Prospective Analysis of Functional Outcome of Single-Stage Surgical Treatment for Symptomatic Tandem Spinal Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) is a rare presentation leading to combined clinical features of upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron lesion which includes intermittent neurogenic claudication with or without neurological deficit, progressive gait imbalance and gait disturbances. In literature, there is controversy whether stage surgery or single-stage surgery should be done.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 2009 to November 2016 in a series of 1381 patients who underwent surgery for various degenerative spinal conditions, 82 patients were diagnosed with having symptomatic TSS with an incidence of 5.93%. All patients diagnosed with TSS underwent single-stage surgical intervention by one surgical team. The perioperative factors were recorded for each patient. All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at each followup with the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, Nurick's grading, Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Cooper scale.

RESULTS

In this study, 82 patients including 70 males and 12 females underwent simultaneous surgical intervention for symptomatic TSS. The mean age of patients was 61.78 ± 10.48 years. There was a significant improvement in mJOA score, Nuricks grading, ODI and Coopers scale postoperatively as compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic TSS can be safely managed by single-stage surgical intervention with good postoperative results or without a significant increase in complication rates. Single-stage surgical intervention helps to relieve the symptoms of both cervical and lumbar spinal cord compression, avoids the risk of repeated anesthesia, reduce the duration of surgery, repeated hospitalization hence, reducing the cost for hospitalization and also reducing the rehabilitation, recuperation time and early functional recovery justifies single-stage surgical intervention.

Surgical outcomes for lumbar spinal canal stenosis with coexisting cervical stenosis (tandem spinal stenosis): a retrospective analysis of 565 cases

Background

Concurrent cervical and lumbar spinal canal stenosis is known as tandem spinal stenosis (TSS). As research on TSS is limited, there is no consensus on the optimal surgical approach to this problem. We evaluated the prevalence and clinical characteristics of TSS in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LCS).

Methods

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of 565 patients who underwent lumbar surgeries performed for symptomatic LCS. In all the patients, both the cervical and lumbar regions were evaluated preoperatively, and we compared TSS patients and non-TSS patients in terms of multiple clinical parameters. In the TSS patients, we investigated the ratio and clinical outcomes of additional cervical surgeries performed on TSS patients.

Results

Two hundred two cases (35.8%) were considered to be TSS. Twenty-eight patients (5.0%) underwent a cervical operation during the follow-up period. There were no differences between the radiographic TSS patients and non-TSS patients in terms of preoperative lumbar-Japanese Orthopedic Association (L-JOA) scores, postoperative L-JOA scores, and the L-JOA recovery rate (14.8 ± 4.4 points vs 14.2 ± 4.6 points, 23.9 ± 4.3 points vs 23.1 ± 4.5 points, 63.7 ± 28.2% vs 60.3 ± 27.9%, respectively), while the TSS group included a greater number of hypertension cases. The recovery rate L-JOA scores of patients who underwent additional cervical surgeries were significantly lower compared with the rate of patients who experienced treatment for only lumbar lesions (62.8 ± 25.8% vs 39.8 ± 35.5%, p = 0.0003). However, additional cervical surgery still improved both the cervical myelopathy-Japanese Orthopedic Association (C-JOA) and L-JOA scores in TSS patients with symptomatic cervical lesion (from 10.3 ± 2.8 points to 12.1 ± 3.0 points, p = 0.0302; from 14.8 ± 7.3 points to 19.9 ± 5.0 points, p = 0.0331, respectively). In these patients, there were no significant differences in the recovery rate of both C-JOA and L-JOA scores between the single-stage surgery group and the staged surgery group (40.7 ± 35.8% vs 20.7 ± 16.1%; 50.9 ± 25.1% vs 34.2 ± 39.3%, respectively).

Conclusions

Radiographic co-existing cervical stenosis did not affect surgical outcomes for LCS, although symptomatic cervical lesion affected neurological score after lumbar surgery. An additional surgery for cervical lesion significantly improved neurological findings in TSS patients.

Predictive factors of symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis in patients after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of coexisting symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) in patients after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and identify possible predictive factors associated with it.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with CSM at our institution between January 2005 and December 2015. Clinical and radiographic factors including age, gender, body mass index, Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, cervical alignment, anteroposterior diameter of cervical canal, number of levels with CSM, and percentage of cervical cord compression were investigated. Symptomatic LCS was defined as leg symptoms and a narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal at one level at least, which is confirmed by magnetic resonance images of the lumbar spine. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify possible predictive factors. Pearson correlation analysis was also conducted to analyze the association between cervical parameters and percentage of LCS.

Results

A total of 317 patients with CSM met the criteria for inclusion. There were 39 patients (12.3%) with LCS after cervical surgery during a mean of 7.3 years’ follow-up. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, narrow diameter of cervical canal (OR, 3.96; 95% CI, 1.20–13.04) was identified as the only independent predictor of symptomatic LCS in CSM patients. The correlation coefficient between anteroposterior diameter of cervical canal and severity of LCS indicated a significantly positive linear relationship with 0.536 (P<0.001).

Conclusion

We found that narrow diameter of cervical canal was associated with symptomatic LCS in CSM patients. Patients with this risk factor should be informed the possibility of symptomatic LCS.

Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Spinal Surgery for Cervical Myelopathic Patients With Coexisting Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis (Tandem Spinal Stenosis): A Retrospective Analysis of 297 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the prevalence and clinical characteristics of tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) in patients with cervical myelopathy including ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine (C-OPLL).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Concurrent cervical and lumbar spinal canal stenosis is generally reported as TSS. Most previous studies have used magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate spinal stenosis in the cervical and lumbar spine.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of the outcomes of 297 myelography and cervical surgeries performed in myelopathic patients. We compared the non-TSS group (n = 125) with the TSS group (n = 172) in terms of multiple clinical parameters. In each group, we compared the cervical non-OPLL cases with the cervical OPLL cases. Moreover, we investigated the ratio and clinical outcomes of additional lumbar surgeries performed for TSS patients.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two cases (57.9%) were considered TSS. Forty-one patients (13.8%) underwent a lumbar operation during the follow-up period. The TSS group included a greater number of OPLL patients, elderly patients, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and non-smokers than the non-TSS group. The postoperative C-JOA score and the C-JOA recovery rate in the TSS group were significantly lower than the non-TSS group. In the TSS group, the non-C-OPLL patients were significantly older than the C-OPLL patients. The C-OPLL patients had higher postoperative C-JOA scores than the non-C-OPLL patients in both the TSS and non-TSS groups. The additional lumbar surgery effectively improved both the C-JOA and L-JOA scores in TSS patients.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis for TSS patients with myelopathy was worse than that for patients with isolated cervical lesions. Younger C-OPLL patients, even those with TSS, showed higher recovery rates than non-C-OPLL patients. Aging and coexistent lumbar lesions may influence the recovery process following surgery for cervical myelopathy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Fractures in Spinal Ankylosing Disorders: A Narrative Review of Disease and Injury Types, Treatment Techniques, and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Spinal ankylosing disorders encompass ankylosing spondylitis (AS), disseminated hyperostosis of the spine, and end-stage spondylosis. All these result in a stiffened and frequently deformed spinal column. This makes the spinal column highly susceptible to severe injuries that are commonly associated with unfavorable outcomes. Improved understanding of the underlying disease processes and clinical comorbidities may alter the poor injury related morbidity and mortality outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases was performed using the following key words to identify articles published between 2001 and 2016: "ankylosing spondylitis," "epidemiology," "DISH," "treatment," "outcome," and/or "fracture." Articles were read for data on methodology (retrospective vs. prospective), type of treatment, number of patients, mean patient age, and mean follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-one identified articles were analyzed. Average age was 63.4 years. Most patients were men. Ground level fall or low energy trauma caused most injuries. Diagnosis was delayed in 15%-41% cases. Hyperextension fracture patterns were most common. Cervical spine fractures were more common than thoracolumbar fractures, with the highest prevalence between C5 and C7. Neurologic deficits were encountered in 21%-100% of patients. Operative fixation and fusion were performed in 40%-100% of patients. Mortality was reported between 0% and 32% at 1 year postinjury. Complications were encountered in 84% of patients, mostly in the form of pneumonia, respiratory failure, and pseudoarthrosis. Neurologic deterioration has been reported in 16% of patients. Fusion was successful in 87%-100% of patients. Neurologic deficits improved in function in 6%-66% at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the stiffening of the spinal column, patients with spinal ankylosing disorders are preferably evaluated for spinal fractures and ligamentous injuries after even trivial trauma. Spinal injuries in patients with AS are difficult to diagnose on plain radiographs; computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are recommended instead. The entire spine should be scanned for multilevel involvement. Although osteoporosis makes fixation of spine implants a significant concern, the literature has reported that most patients with AS treated surgically had good outcomes. Numerous studies have reported risks associated with conservative management.

Prioritized cervical or lumbar surgery for coexisting cervical and lumbar stenosis: Prognostic analysis of 222 case

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Single-stage surgery is usually applied to improving the symptoms of coexisting cervical and lumbar stenosis. In most cases, patients' willingness, surgery affordability, surgical trauma, surgical complications and patients' tolerance to surgery all limit the application of single-stage surgery. For patients who cannot receive single-stage surgery, we hope that we can find out by weighing up merits and flaws of the two surgical sites in order to make decision of prioritize one of the two surgery, so as to bring more benefits to the patients.

OBJECTIVE

To confirm which one of prioritized cervical surgery and prioritized lumbar surgery has a better effect in alleviating the symptoms of patients with coexisting cervical and lumbar stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis and a cohort study for 15 years.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The information of 222 patients who were diagnosed with coexisting cervical and lumbar stenosis over the past 15 years was collected, including 144 patients who underwent prioritized cervical surgery and 78 prioritized lumbar surgery, thereafter the changes in the patients' postoperative neurological functions were evaluated.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome variables are the clinical diagnosis event and the event of surgical site positioning. Secondary variables are the event of postoperative function changes and the symptom improvement event.

METHODS

The information about 222 patients with coexisting cervical and lumbar stenosis who had a follow-up of more than 1 year during January 2000 and December 2014 was collected. The effects of prioritized staged cervical and lumbar surgeries on the prognosis for the above-mentioned patients were respectively evaluated via relevant evaluation indexes.

RESULTS

The follow-up time was 18-156 months (58.0 ± 36.5). The lumbar reoperation rate after prioritized cervical surgery was lower than the cervical reoperation rate after prioritized lumbar surgery (22.91% < 57.69%) (P < 0.01). The JOA score and Nurick grade significantly improved (P < 0.01) and the ODI score improved (P < 0.05) after prioritized cervical surgery. No obvious improvement in the JOA score and Nurick grade (P > 0.05) was shown but the ODI score markedly improved (P < 0.01) after prioritized lumbar surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with coexisting cervical and lumbar stenosis, prioritized cervical surgery is safe and effective and is superior to prioritized lumbar surgery on the improvement of cervical and lumbar symptoms, the postoperative recovery of limb function and the rate of reoperation on another site.

Relief of Lumbar Symptoms After Cervical Decompression in Patients with Tandem Spinal Stenosis Presenting with Primarily Lumbar Pain

Objective: Tandem cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis (TSS) is classically described as intermittent claudication, gait disturbance, and clinical findings of mixed myelopathy and polyradiculopathy. Rarely, patients can present with TSS manifesting in isolated lumbar pain. Several reports have demonstrated improved lumbar back pain and radiculopathy after decompressive cervical spine procedures. We present six patients with dramatic resolution of lumbar spine related symptoms after decompression of the cervical spinal cord despite presenting solely with lower back complaints.

Methods: Clinical records of the senior author (F.A.S.) gathered from April 2006 to March 2013 were retrospectively reviewed identifying six patients presenting solely with lumbar symptoms and diagnosed with TSS based on history and physical examination.

Results: Six patients with a mean age of 55 (range 39 to 60) presented with solely lower back symptoms and clinical findings suspicious for TSS. Mean follow-up time for all patients was 12 months (range three to 27 months, median 11.5 months). Three patients underwent a cervical procedure as the principal operation, while the remainder had the lumbar spine decompressed initially. All patients that underwent a cervical procedure initially experienced a dramatic decrease or complete resolution of their preoperative lower back pain and radiculopathy (mean preoperative VAS of 6.7 vs. 3.7 postoperative). The remainder of patients with persistent lumbar symptoms resolved after a subsequent cervical operation.

Conclusion: Patients presenting with lumbar symptoms out of proportion to imaging require further investigation. We highlight the resolution of lumbar symptoms after a cervical procedure in a select group of patients presenting with lone lower back complaints. In patients presenting with symptoms disproportionate to lumbar imaging, treatment of cervical pathology may provide robust long-term relief of the initial lumbar-related presentation. 

A novel MRI classification system for congenital functional lumbar spinal stenosis predicts the risk for tandem cervical spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a simple and clinically useful morphological classification system for congenital lumbar spinal stenosis using sagittal MRI, allowing clinicians to recognize patterns of lumbar congenital stenosis quickly and be able to screen these patients for tandem cervical stenosis.

METHODS

Forty-four subjects with an MRI of both the cervical and lumbar spine were included. On the lumbar spine MRI, the sagittal canal morphology was classified as one of three types: Type I normal, Type II partially narrow, Type III globally narrow. For the cervical spine, the Torg-Pavlov ratio on X-ray and the cervical spinal canal width on MRI were measured. Kruskal-Wallis analysis was done to determine if there was a relationship between the sagittal morphology of the lumbar spinal canal and the presence of cervical spinal stenosis.

RESULTS

Subjects with a type III globally narrow lumbar spinal canal had a significantly lower cervical Torg-Pavlov ratio and smaller cervical spinal canal width than those with a type I normal lumbar spinal canal.

CONCLUSION

A type III lumbar spinal canal is a globally narrow canal characterized by a lack of spinal fluid around the conus. This was defined as "functional lumbar spinal stenosis" and is associated with an increased incidence of tandem cervical spinal stenosis.

One-staged combined decompression for the patients with cervico-thoracic tandem spinal stenosis

PURPOSE

To report the techniques and safety of one-staged combined decompression for the patients with tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) at cervical and thoracic spine.

METHODS

Sixteen TSS subjects, who received combined decompression from Aug 2005 to Feb 2012, were reviewed. The essentials of our surgical strategy included: choosing patients with TSS from cervical to upper or middle thoracic spine, using one single posterior incision, simplifying surgical maneuvers and performing circumferential decompression for thoracic compression if it was indicated. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scale for cervical myelopathy was employed to evaluate the neurological status, and Hirabayashi's system to assess neurological recovery rate.

RESULTS

The average operation duration, blood loss and postoperative hospitalization were 242.8 ± 89.9 min, 1581.3 ± 1237.2 ml and 11.9 ± 7.5 days, respectively. Six subjects (37.5 %) suffered instant neurological deterioration. Other complications included cerebrospinal fluid leakage (10 subjects, 62.5 %), new radiculopathy (two subjects), urinary infection, lung infection and pulmonary thromboembolism. Four subjects received extra-thoracic decompression due to the remaining anterior compression in one subject and new emerging compression in other three subjects. Eventually, mean JOA score was elevated from 9.8 ± 2.1 to 13.7 ± 2.7 after this procedure, and the neurological recovery of seven subjects was rated as excellent, four as good, two as fair, three as unchanged or deteriorated. The overall recovery rate was 53.7 %.

CONCLUSION

Combined cervico-thoracic decompression could provide fair neurological outcomes for patients with cervico-thoracic TSS, but it was complicated with high rate of undesirable postoperative events. So, more efforts should be done against its eventful postoperative course before its wide application.

Symptomatic Triple-Region Spinal Stenosis Treated with Simultaneous Surgery: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Study Design Case report. Objectives Symptomatic triple-region spinal stenosis (TRSS), defined as spinal stenosis in three different regions of the spine, is extremely rare. To our knowledge, treatment with simultaneous decompressive surgery is not described in the literature. We report a case of a patient with TRSS who was treated successfully with simultaneous decompressive surgery in three separate regions of the spine. Methods A 50-year-old man presented with combined progressive cervical and thoracic myelopathy along with severe lumbar spinal claudication and radiculopathy. He underwent simultaneous decompressive surgery in all three regions of his spine and concomitant instrumented fusion in the cervical and thoracic regions. Results Estimated blood loss for the procedure was 600 mL total (250 mL cervical, 250 mL thoracic, 100 mL lumbar) and operative time was ∼3.5 hours. No changes were noted on intraoperative monitoring. The postoperative course was uncomplicated. The patient was discharged to inpatient rehabilitation on postoperative day (POD) 7 and discharged home on POD 11. At 6-month follow-up, his gait and motor function was improved and returned to normal in all extremities. He remains partially disabled due to chronic back pain. Conclusions This report is the first of symptomatic TRSS treated with simultaneous surgery in three different regions of the spine. Simultaneous triple region stenosis surgery appears to be an effective treatment option for this rare condition, but may be associated with prolonged hospital stay after surgery.

Delayed diagnosis of probable radiation induced spinal cord vascular disorders

Occasionally, unexpected neurological deficits occur after lumbar spinal surgery. We report a case of monoparesis after lumbar decompressive surgery. A 63-year-old man, who had undergone decompression of L4-5 for spinal stenosis 4 days previously in the other hospital, visted the emergency department with progressive weakness in the left leg and hypoesthesia below sensory level T7 on the right side. He had been cured of lung cancer with chemotherapy and radiation therapy 10 years previously, but detailed information of radiotherapy was not available. Whole spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging showed fatty marrow change from T1 to T8, most likely due to previous irradiation. The T2-weighted MR image showed a high-signal T4-5 spinal cord lesion surrounded by a low signal rim, and the T1-weighted MR image showed focal high signal intensity with focal enhancement. The radiological diagnosis was vascular disorders with suspicious bleeding. Surgical removal was refused by the patient. With rehabilitation, the patient could walk independently without assistance 2 months later. Considering radiation induced change at thoracic vertebrae, vascular disorders may be induced by irradiation. If the spinal cord was previously irradiated, radiation induced vascular disorders needs to be considered.

A rare case of multiregional spinal stenosis: clinical description, surgical complication, and management concept review

Study Design Case report and literature review. Objective Multiregional spinal stenosis (MRSS) has not been described in the English literature, although a few studies report the concept of tandem spinal stenosis. Due to the concurrent spinal stenosis occurring in three separate regions of the spine, clinical presentation of MRSS may be less distinct, and its surgical treatment priorities and challenges differ from single-region spinal stenosis. The purpose of this article is to describe a new concept and a rare case of MRSS as separated segments of spinal stenosis in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. Methods A retrospective case description of MRSS and surgical strategies used in managing such extensive multiregional stenosis and its potential complications. Results  A novel surgical strategy using a combination of laminectomies with fusion and laminoplasty without fusion to treat this patient with such extensive cervical to thoracic myelopathic cord compression is described. Initial good recovery after cervical cord decompression was followed by a delayed recurrence of symptoms from thoracic cord compression. The subsequent thoracic surgical decompression, its complications and management, and patient recovery are discussed with a literature review highlighting the possible mechanisms for postoperative loss of neurologic function after thoracic decompression. Conclusion MRSS is a rare cause of extensive compression of multiple regions of the spinal cord. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this report is the first to use the term multiregional spinal stenosis to describe this new emergent clinical entity, surgical management strategies, and potential complications.

Coexisting lumbar and cervical stenosis (tandem spinal stenosis): an infrequent presentation. Retrospective analysis of single-stage surgery (53 cases)

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 53 patients who underwent single stage simultaneous surgery for tandem spinal stenosis (TSS) at single centre.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the presentation of combined cervical and lumbar (tandem) stenosis and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of single-stage simultaneous surgery. Combined stenosis is an infrequent presentation with mixed presentation of upper motor neuron and lower motor neuron signs. Scarce literature on its presentation and management is available. There is a controversy in the surgical strategy of these patients. Staged surgeries are frequently recommended and only few single-stage surgeries reported.

METHODS

All the patients were clinico-radiologically diagnosed TSS. Surgeries were performed in single stage by two teams. Results were evaluated with Nurick grade, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score (mJOA), oswestry disability index (ODI), patient satisfaction index, mJOA recovery rate, blood loss and complication.

RESULTS

The mJOA cervical and ODI score improved from a mean 8.86 and 68.15 preoperatively to 13.00 and 30.11, respectively, at 12 months and to 14.52 and 24.03 at final follow-up. The average mJOA recovery rate was 48.23 ± 26.90 %. Patient satisfaction index was 2.13 ± 0.91 at final follow-up. Estimated blood loss of ≤400 ml and operating room time of <150 min showed improvement of scores and lessened the complications. In the age group below 60 years, the improvement was statistically significant in ODI (p = 0.02) and Nurick's grade (p = 0.03) with average improvement in mJOA score.

CONCLUSION

Short-lasting surgery, single anaesthesia, reduced morbidity and hospital stay as well as costs, an early return to function, high patient satisfaction rate with encouraging results justify single-stage surgery in TSS. Age, blood loss and duration of surgery decide the complication rate and outcome of surgery. Staged surgery is recommended in patients above the age of 60 years.

Neurological deterioration due to missed thoracic spinal stenosis after decompressive lumbar surgery

There have been a few reports of patients with a combination of lumbar and thoracic spinal stenosis. We describe six patients who suffered unexpected acute neurological deterioration at a mean of 7.8 days (6 to 10) after lumbar decompressive surgery. Five had progressive weakness and one had recurrent pain in the lower limbs. There was incomplete recovery following subsequent thoracic decompressive surgery.

The neurological presentation can be confusing. Patients with compressive myelopathy due to lower thoracic lesions, especially epiconus lesions (T10 to T12/L1 disc level), present with similar symptoms to those with lumbar radiculopathy or cauda equina lesions. Despite the rarity of this condition we advise that patients who undergo lumbar decompressive surgery for stenosis should have sagittal whole spine MRI studies pre-operatively to exclude proximal neurological compression.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1388–91.

The effects of surgery on locomotion in elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of surgery on locomotor ability in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and compare the results between elderly and younger patients.

METHODS

A total of 369 consecutive patients who underwent expansive laminoplasty for CSM were prospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two age groups of ≥ 75 years (elderly group, 76 patients) and <75 years (younger group, 293 patients). Locomotor ability was estimated using part of the functional independence measure (FIM). The sum of gait and stairs items [functional independence measure (locomotion), FIM-L; possible scores, 2-14] and neurological status were estimated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score (possible score, 0-17). Pre-operative neurological anamnesis was reviewed, and the surgical results of elderly patients with or without co-existing neurological history were evaluated to determine the origin of locomotor disability.

RESULTS

Peri-operative FIM-L and JOA scores were significantly lower in the elderly group than in the younger group, and the opposite was true for improved FIM score. Cerebral infarction and previous lumbar surgery were identified as neurological co-morbidities in the elderly group. However, there was no significant difference in surgical results between elderly patients with and without co-existing neurological disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Decompression surgery can improve locomotor ability and decrease nursing care requirements among elderly patients with CSM. However, other neurological diseases can co-exist in elderly patients, making it difficult to diagnose the origin of locomotor disability. Therefore, detailed peri-operative work-up and timely decompression should be given priority to avoid progression towards fixed locomotor disability.

Is congenital bony stenosis of the cervical spine associated with congenital bony stenosis of the thoracic spine? An anatomic study of 1072 human cadaveric specimens

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Tandem stenosis of the cervical and lumbar spine is known to occur in 5% of individuals with symptomatic neural compression in one region. However, the prevalence of concurrent cervical and thoracic stenosis is not known. Whether this relationship is due to an increased risk of degenerative disease in these individuals, or whether this finding is due to the tandem presence of a congenitally small cervical and thoracic canal is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of concurrent thoracic and cervical stenosis and whether the presence of stenosis in the cervical spine is associated with stenosis in the thoracic spine.

STUDY DESIGN

A morphoanatomic study of the cervical and thoracic cadaveric spines.

METHODS

A total of 1072 adult skeletal specimens from the Hamann-Todd Collection in the Cleveland Museum of Natural History were selected. Canal area at each level was also calculated using a geometric formula. A standard distribution for each level was created, and values that were 2 SD below mean were considered as being congenitally stenotic. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the association between the additive canal areas at all levels in the cervical and thoracic spine and to determine the association between the number of stenotic levels in the cervical and thoracic spine. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for concurrent cervical and thoracic stenosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of concurrent cervical and thoracic stenosis is 1%. A positive association was found between the additive areas of all cervical and thoracic levels (P<0.01). No association, however, was found between the number of stenotic thoracic and cervical levels (P=0.689). Log regression demonstrated no significant association (odds ratio <1) between stenosis in the thoracic and cervical spine.

CONCLUSIONS

The area changes in the cervical spine correlate with area variations in the thoracic spine and the severity of stenosis in the thoracic spine increases as the levels of stenosis increase in the cervical spine. The presence of tandem cervical and thoracic stenosis does seem to be, in part, related to the tandem presence of a congenitally small cervical and thoracic canal.