Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine

Navigation Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery

Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) advances the principles of minimally invasive surgery, including minor collateral tissue damage, reduced blood loss, and faster recovery times. ESS allows for direct access to the spine through small incisions and direct visualization of spinal pathology via an endoscope. While this technique has many applications, there is a steep learning curve when adopting ESS into a surgeon's practice. Two types of navigation, optical and electromagnetic, may allow for widespread utilization of ESS by engendering improved orientation to surgical anatomy and reduced complication rates. The present review discusses these two available navigation technologies and their application in endoscopic procedures by providing case examples. Furthermore, we report on the future directions of navigation within the discipline of ESS.

Machine Vision Navigation in Spine Surgery

The advancements in computing and digital localizer technologies has led to the evolving clinical application of image-guided technology for the surgical management of spinal disorders. Image-guided spinal navigation addresses the limitations of fluoroscopy and improves the accurate placement of fixation screws. Several navigation platforms are currently available, each having its own unique advantages and disadvantages. The most recent spinal navigation system developed utilizes machine vision structured light imaging which creates a precise and detailed three-dimensional image of the exposed surface anatomy and co-registers it to a pre-operatively or intra-operatively acquired image. This system improves upon the intraoperative workflow and efficiency of the navigation process. With the continued advancements in machine vision, there is a potential for clinical applications that extend beyond surgical navigation. These applications include reducing the potential for wrong level spine surgery and providing for real-time tracking of spinal deformity correction. As the adoption and clinical experience with navigation continues to expand and evolve, the technology that enables navigation also continues to evolve.

The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery

The advent and widespread adoption of pedicle screw instrumentation prompted the need for image guidance in spine surgery to improve accuracy and safety. Although the conventional method, fluoroscopy, is readily available and inexpensive, concerns regarding radiation exposure and the drive to provide better visual guidance spurred the development of computer-assisted navigation. Contemporaneously, a non-navigated robotic guidance platform was also introduced as a competing modality for pedicle screw placement. Although the robot could provide high precision trajectory guidance by restricting four of the six degrees of freedom (DOF), the lack of real-time depth control and high capital acquisition cost diminished its popularity, while computer-assisted navigation platforms became increasingly sophisticated and accepted. The recent integration of real-time 3D navigation with robotic platforms has resulted in a resurgence of interest in robotics in spine surgery with the recent introduction of numerous navigated robotic platforms. The currently available navigated robotic spine surgery platforms include the ROSA Spine Robot (Zimmer Biomet Robotics formerly Medtech SA, Montpellier, France), ExcelsiusGPS^® (Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA), Mazor X spine robot (Medtronic Navigation Louisville, CO; Medtronic Spine, Memphis, TN; formerly Mazor Robotics, Caesarea, Israel) and TiRobot (TINAVI Medical Technologies, Beijing, China). Here we provide an overview of these navigated spine robotic platforms, existing applications, and potential future avenues of implementation.

Narrative review of intraoperative imaging guidance for decompression-only surgery

Decompression of the spine is defined as removal of bony and soft tissue structures in order to provide space for the spinal cord and/or nerve roots. This definition, however, underscores the dangers and complexity of safely providing anatomical space for these neurologic structures. Complications such as neurologic injury, vascular injury, and durotomy can make these procedures hazardous for the patient and surgeon. Furthermore, inability to fully decompress the neural elements will result in continued symptoms for patients. Intraoperative image guidance can provide important anatomical landmarks to perform these decompressive surgeries safely and efficiently. In particular, performing decompression surgery utilizing minimally invasive techniques with image guidance can allow for the least amount of muscle/soft tissue trauma possible. Within our article we outline research on the forefront of use of intra-operative imaging guidance for spine surgery and implications for decompression surgery. We also outline a case from the senior author to illustrate an example of image-guided spine decompression for cervical radiculopathy. Future technology, such as augmented reality and robotics, is also discussed in the context of image guided decompression. The authors hope this article shows surgeons that use of image guidance in specific clinical situations can allow for better/safer spinal decompression procedures.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic image-guided spine surgery: evolution of 19 years of experience, from endoscopy to fully integrated 3D navigation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the evolution of thoracoscopic spine surgery from basic endoscopic procedures using fluoroscopy and anatomical localization through developmental iterations to the current technology use in which endoscopy and image-guided surgery are merged with intraoperative CT scanning.

METHODS

The authors provided detailed explanations of their thoracoscopic spine surgery techniques, beginning with their early-generation endoscopy with fluoroscopic localization, which was followed with point surface matching techniques and early image guidance. The authors supplanted this with the modern era of image guidance, thoracoscopic spine surgery, and seamless integration that has reached its current level of refinement.

RESULTS

A retrospective review of single-institution thoracoscopic procedures performed by the senior author over the course of 19 years yielded a total of 160 patients, including 73 women and 87 men. The mean patient age was 55 years, and the range included patients 16-94 years of age. There were no patients with worsened neurological function. One hundred sixteen patients underwent surgery for thoracic disc herniation, 18 for underlying neoplasms with spinal cord compression, 14 for osteomyelitis and discitis, 12 for thoracic deformity with neurological changes, and 8 for traumatic etiologies.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 19 years of experience has revealed the benefits of integrating thoracoscopic spine surgery with intraoperative CT scanning and image-guided surgery, including direct decompression without manipulation of neural elements, superior 3D spatial orientation, and localization of complex spinal anatomy. With the exponential growth of machine learning, robotics, artificial intelligence, and advances in imaging techniques and endoscopic imaging, there may be further refinements of this technique on the horizon.

The Use of Image-Guided Navigation Systems During Spine Surgeries in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

We used a cross-sectional study design (questionnaire) to investigate the use of image-guided navigation (IGN) in Saudi Arabia and explore possible differences in implementing IGN for daily practice.

METHODS

An internet-based survey was sent to all spine surgeons who are practicing in Saudi Arabia (orthopedics or neurosurgery). The survey is composed of 12 items that collected demographic and academic data.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine answered the questionnaire from 197; 80% were from Riyadh, the capital, and 50% were consultants (attending physicians). Orthopedic surgeons were almost 60% of responders compared to 40% neurosurgeons. The use of navigation in Saudi hospitals was high (76.8%). There was a significant difference between specialties in the preference of using navigation (23.2% for orthopedics versus 81.4% for neurosurgery, P < .001) and routine use in surgical spine cases (88.4% for neurosurgery versus 50.0% orthopedics, P < .001). The majority of responders from neurosurgery learned to use navigation during residency compared to orthopedics responders (51.2% versus 28.6%, P = .001). More than 30% of orthopedics responders expressed they never learned navigation compared to only 4% of neurosurgery responders. The comfort level of > 75% with performing surgery using navigation was significantly different between specialties (25% for orthopedics versus 46.5% for neurosurgery, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Saudi spine surgeons are among the highest users of IGN systems. The strong healthcare infrastructure and the availability of these devices across the country are among the most important factors for its prevalence. Enhancing surgical exposure and education of postgraduate trainees to use these tools, especially within orthopedics, could increase use and comfort level rates.

History and advances in spinal neurosurgery

Insight into the historic contributions made to modern-day spine surgery provides context for understanding the monumental accomplishments comprising current techniques, technology, and clinical success. Only during the last century did surgical growth occur in the treatment of spinal disorders. With that growth came a renaissance of innovation, particularly with the evolution of spinal instrumentation and fixation techniques. In this article, the authors capture some of the key milestones that have led to the field of spine surgery today, with an emphasis on the historical advances related to instrumentation, navigation, minimally invasive surgery, robotics, and neurosurgical training.

3D printed anatomical (bio)models in spine surgery: clinical benefits and value to health care providers

The applications of three-dimensional printing (3DP) for clinical purposes have grown rapidly over the past decade. Recent advances include the fabrication of patient specific instrumentation, such as drill and cutting guides, patient specific/custom long term implants and 3DP of cellular scaffolds. Spine surgery in particular has seen enthusiastic early adoption of these applications. 3DP as a manufacturing method can be used to mass produce objects of the same design, but can also be used as a cost-effective method for manufacturing unique one-off objects, such as patient specific models and devices. Perhaps the first, and currently most widespread, application of 3DP for producing patient specific devices is the production of patient specific anatomical models, often termed biomodels. The present manuscript focuses on the current state of the art in anatomical (bio)models as used in spinal clinical practice. The biomodels shown and discussed include: translucent and coloured models to aid in identification of extent and margins of pathologies such as bone tumours; dynamic models for implant trial implantation and pre-operative sizing; models that can be disassembled to simulate surgical resection of diseased tissue and subsequent reconstruction. Biomodels can reduce risk to the patient by decreasing surgery time, reducing the probability of the surgical team encountering unexpected anatomy or relative positioning of structures and/or devices, and better pre-operative planning of the surgical workflow including ordered preparation of the necessary instrumentation for multi-step and revision procedures. Conversely, risks can be increased if biomodels are not accurate representations of the anatomy, which can occur if MRI/CT scan data is simply converted into 3DP format without interpretation of what the scan represents in terms of patient anatomy. A review and analysis of the cost-benefits of biomodels shows that biomodels can potentially reduce cost to health care providers if operating room time is reduced by 14 minutes or more.

Mini Screws for Improving Accuracy in Navigation-assisted Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Presentation of a surgical technique with accompanying video (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CLINSPINE/A67) of an illustrative case.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to present a helpful and easy-to-implement technique for improving initial referencing accuracy, as well as rereferencing accuracy in cases of multilevel instrumentation or in cases of dislocation of the reference array.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Navigation-assisted spine surgery has become standard of care in most hospitals performing complex spine interventions. Although short-segment instrumentations are fairly straight-forward with current hardware and software solutions, obtaining ideal accuracies and troubleshooting reference array disruptions remain challenging.

METHODS

A surgical technique is presented as a step-by-step guide using intraoperative videos and photographs as well as imaging data in an illustrative case of thoracic hemivertebra resection and dorsal instrumentation.

TECHNIQUE/RESULTS

After skin incision is performed at the index level, posterior soft tissue preparation is performed. Before firmly attaching the reference array to a spinous process we then insert a minimum of four 5 mm mini screws at any bony structure within the exposure. Then an intraoperative navigation scan (3-dimensional computed tomography or x-ray) is obtained, and initial referencing is performed using the previously inserted mini screws as landmarks. This yields mean accuracies of 1 mm or lower and is easily verifiable by placing the navigation probe on a mini screw head. This action can be swiftly repeated at any time to prevent reduced accuracy because of insertion forces applied during pedicle screw placement. In addition, this allows for easy rereferencing in cases of disruption or complete removal of the navigation array, eliminating the need to perform additional computed tomography or x-ray scans during the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique presented allows for rapid and highly accurate initial referencing and can be used in all cases of navigation-assisted spine surgery. It also allows for hassle-free rereferencing in cases of disruption or accidental removal of the reference array.

The Role of Intraoperative Navigation in Orthopaedic Surgery

An orthopaedic surgeon's knowledge of anatomical landmarks is crucial, but other modalities supplement this by providing guidance and feedback to a surgeon. Advances in imaging have enabled three-dimensional visualization of the surgical field and patient anatomy, whereas advances in computer technology have allowed for real-time tracking of instruments and implants. Together, these innovations have given rise to intraoperative navigation systems. The authors review these advances in intraoperative navigation across orthopaedic subspecialties, focusing on the most recent evidence on patient outcomes and complications, the associated learning curve, and the effects on operative time, radiation exposure, and cost. In spine surgery, navigated pedicle screw placement may increase accuracy and safety, especially valuable when treating complex deformities. Improved accuracy of pelvic and peri-articular tumor resection and percutaneous fixation of acetabular and femoral neck fractures has also been achieved using navigation. Early applications in arthroscopy have included surface-based registration for tunnel positioning for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and osteochondroplasty for femoro-acetabular impingement. Navigated arthroplasty techniques have addressed knee gap balancing and mechanical axis restoration as well as acetabular cup and glenoid baseplate positioning. Among these orthopaedic subspecialties, significant variation is found in the clinical relevance and dedication to research of navigation techniques.

The use of robotics in minimally invasive spine surgery

The field of spine surgery has changed significantly over the past few decades as once technological fantasy has become reality. The advent of stereotaxis, intra-operative navigation, endoscopy, and percutaneous instrumentation have altered the landscape of spine surgery. The concept of minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery has blossomed over the past ten years and now robot-assisted spine surgery is being championed by some as another potential paradigm altering technological advancement. The application of robotics in other surgical specialties has been shown to be a safe and feasible alternative to the traditional, open approach. In 2004 the Mazor Spine Assist robot was approved by FDA to assist with placement of pedicle screws and since then, more advanced robots with promising clinical outcomes have been introduced. Currently, robotic platforms are limited to pedicle screw placement. However, there are centers investigating the role of robotics in decompression, dural closure, and pre-planned osteotomies. Robot-assisted spine surgery has been shown to increase the accuracy of pedicle screw placement and decrease radiation exposure to surgeons. However, modern robotic technology also has certain disadvantages including a high introductory cost, steep learning curve, and inherent technological glitches. Currently, robotic spine surgery is in its infancy and most of the objective evidence available regarding its benefits draws from the use of robots in a shared-control model to assist with the placement of pedicle screws. As artificial intelligence software and feedback sensor design become more sophisticated, robots could facilitate other, more complex surgical tasks such as bony decompression or dural closure. The accuracy and precision afforded by the current robots available for use in spinal surgery potentially allow for even less tissue destructive and more meticulous MIS surgery. This article aims to provide a contemporary review of the use of robotics in MIS surgery.

Minimally Invasive, Stereotactic, Wireless, Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine: Accuracy Rates With 182 Consecutive Screws

BACKGROUND

Standard fluoroscopic navigation and stereotactic computed tomography-guided lumbar pedicle screw instrumentation traditionally relied on the placement of Kirshner wires (K-wires) to ensure accurate screw placement. The use of K-wires, however, is associated with a risk of morbidity due to potential ventral displacement into the retroperitoneum. We report our experience using a computer image-guided, wireless method for pedicle screw placement. We hypothesize that minimally invasive, wireless pedicle screw placement is as accurate and safe as the traditional technique using K-wires while decreasing operative time and avoiding potential complications associated with K-wires.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 42 consecutive patients who underwent a stereotactic-guided, wireless lumbar pedicle screw placement. All screws were placed to provide fixation to a variety of interbody fusion constructs including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, lateral interbody fusion, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. The procedures were performed using the O-arm intraoperative imaging system with StealthStation navigation (Medtronic, Memphis, TN) and Medtronic navigated instrumentation. After placing a percutaneous navigation frame into the posterior superior iliac spine or onto an adjacent spinous process, an intraoperative O-arm image was obtained to allow subsequent StealthStation navigation. Para-median incisions were selected to allow precise percutaneous access to the target pedicles. The pedicles were cannulated using either a stereotactic drill or a novel awl-tipped tap along with a low-speed/high-torque power driver. The initial trajectory into the pedicle was recorded on the Medtronic StealthStation prior to removal of the drill or awl-tap, creating a "virtual" K-wire rather than inserting an actual K-wire to allow subsequent tapping and screw insertion. Accurate screw placement is achieved by following the virtual path as an exact computer-aided design model of the screw traversing the pedicle is projected onto the display and by using audible and tactile feedback. A second O-arm scan was obtained to confirm accuracy of screw placement.

RESULTS

A total of 20 women and 22 men (average age = 56 years) underwent a total of 182 pedicle screw placements using the stereotactic, wireless technique. The total breach rate was 9.9%, with a clinically significant breach rate of 0% (defined as >2 mm medial breach or >4 mm lateral breach) and a clinical complication rate of 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Wireless, percutaneous placement of lumbar pedicle screws using computed tomography-guided stereotactic navigation is a safe, reproducible technique with very high accuracy rates.

Perspective review on applications of optics in spinal surgery

Optical technologies may be applied to multiple facets of spinal surgery from diagnostics to intraoperative image guidance to therapeutics. In diagnostics, the current standard remains cross-sectional static imaging. Optical surface scanning tools may have an important role; however, significant work is required to clearly correlate surface metrics to radiographic and clinically relevant spinal anatomy and alignment. In the realm of intraoperative image guidance, optical tracking is widely developed as the current standard of instrument tracking, however remains compromised by line-of-sight issues and more globally cumbersome registration workflows. Surface scanning registration tools are being refined to address concerns over workflow and learning curves, and allow real-time update of tissue deformation; however, the line-of-sight issues plaguing instrument tracking remain to be addressed. In therapeutics, optical applications exist in both visualization, in the form of endoscopes, and ablation, in the form of lasers. Further work is required to extend the feasibility of laser ablation to multiple tissues, including disc, bone, and tumor, in a safe and time-efficient manner. Finally, we postulate some of the short- and long-term opportunities for future growth of optical techniques in the context of spinal surgery. Particular emphasis is placed on intraoperative image guidance, the area of the authors' primary expertise.

Pedicle screw fixation in thoracolumbar and lumbar spine assisted by lateral fluoroscopic imaging: a study to evaluate the accuracy of screw placement

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw placement, its advantages, and limitations in posterior instrumentation of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures assisted only by lateral fluoroscopic imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre- and postoperative computerized tomographic (CT) scans of 117 patients with thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures, who underwent posterior instrumentation with pedicle screw fixation, were prospectively analyzed. Accuracy of screw placement, reconstruction of the vertebral height, and correction of the kyphotic angle were studied. Position of the pedicle screws were determined, and cortical breach was graded on the postoperative axial CT scans. Percentage of vertebral height reconstruction and kyphotic angle correction were calculated from the postoperative midsagittal CT scans.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-eight pedicle screws in 234 motion segments were included in this study. 427 screws were centrally placed with an accuracy rate of 91.24%. Out of the 41 (8.76%) screws that breached the pedicle wall, 32 (6.84%) screws had violated the medial wall, while 9 (1.92%) screws breached the lateral wall. There were no "air-ball" screws. No screw penetrated the anterior wall. Postoperatively, none of the patients deteriorated neurologically, and no screw required revision. Postoperatively, there was significant restoration of vertebral height and correction of kyphosis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pedicle fixation performed on a Relton-Hall frame is relatively simple and, when performed carefully using only lateral fluoroscopic imaging, has a lower potential for complications due to cortical breach.

Resection of spinal column tumors utilizing image-guided navigation: a multicenter analysis

OBJECTIVE The use of intraoperative stereotactic navigation has become more available in spine surgery. The authors undertook this study to assess the utility of intraoperative CT navigation in the localization of spinal lesions and as an intraoperative tool to guide resection in patients with spinal lesions. METHODS This was a retrospective multicenter study including 50 patients from 2 different institutions who underwent biopsy and/or resection of spinal column tumors using image-guided navigation. Of the 50 cases reviewed, 4 illustrative cases are presented. In addition, the authors provide a description of surgical technique with image guidance. RESULTS The patient group included 27 male patients and 23 female patients. Their average age was 61 ± 17 years (range 14-87 years). The average operative time (incision to closure) was 311 ± 188 minutes (range 62-865 minutes). The average intraoperative blood loss was 882 ± 1194 ml (range 5-7000 ml). The average length of hospitalization was 10 ± 8.9 days (range 1-36 days). The postoperative complications included 2 deaths (4.0%) and 4 radiculopathies (8%) secondary to tumor burden. CONCLUSIONS O-arm 3D imaging with stereotactic navigation may be used to localize lesions intraoperatively with real-time dynamic feedback of tumor resection. Stereotactic guidance may augment resection or biopsy of primary and metastatic spinal tumors. It offers reduced radiation exposure to operating room personnel and the ability to use minimally invasive approaches that limit tissue injury. In addition, acquisition of intraoperative CT scans with real-time tracking allows for precise targeting of spinal lesions with minimal dissection.

CORRELATION: IMPEDANCE AND TOMOGRAPHY IN IMPLANTS INSERTION IN LUMBAR ARTHRODESIS

ABSTRACT Objective: To define whether the electroneurophysiological stimulation would be a safe method for reducing injuries in nerve roots during surgery of lumbar spine arthrodesis, as well as verify whether there is a direct correlation between the intraoperative impedance values and the distance from the medial cortical pedicle screw. Methods: Randomized retrospective multicenter study of 10 patients who underwent arthrodesis of lumbar spine after conservative treatment failure, with a total of 50 pedicle screws instrumented. Reliable and safe impedance values were measured in order to reduce the risk of injury to nerve roots in the perioperative period, and these values were compared with the distance between the screw and the medial cortical of the pedicle by CT scan, measured in the immediate post-operative period. Results: There is no direct correlation between the intraoperative impedance values and the distance from the screw to the medial cortical of the pedicle. Conclusion: The electroneurostimulation proved to be a reliable quantitative method to reduce the risk of injury to nerve roots during surgery of lumbar spine arthrodesis when the measured values are greater than 10mA.

Image-guided Spine Stabilization for Traumatic Or Osteoporotic Spine Injury: Radiological Accuracy and Neurological Outcome

Significant progress has been made in image-guided surgery (IGS) over the last few decades. IGS can be effectively applied to spinal instrumentation surgery. In the present study, we focused our attention on the feasibility and safety of image-guided spine stabilization for traumatic or osteoporotic spine injury. The IGS spine fixation with or without minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques such as percutaneous screw placement, balloon kyphoplasty (BKP), or vertebroplasty (VP) were accomplished in 80 patients with traumatic or osteoprotic spine injury between 2007 and 2015. The injured vertebral levels included the following: cervical spine, 41; thoracic spine, 22; and lumbar spine, 17. Neurological condition before and after surgery was assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS). A total of 419 pedicle, lateral mass, or laminar screws were placed, and 399 screws (95.2%) were found to be placed correctly based on postoperative computed tomography scan. Although 20 screws (4.8%) were found to be unexpectedly placed incorrectly, no neural or vascular complications closely associated with screw placement were encountered. Neurological outcomes appeared to be acceptable or successful based on AIS. The IGS is a promising technique that can improve the accuracy of screw placement and reduce potential injury to critical neurovascular structures. The integration of MIS and IGS has proved feasible and safe in the treatment of traumatic or osteoporotic spine injury, although a thorough knowledge of surgical anatomy, spine biomechanics, and basic technique remain the most essential aspects for a successful surgery.

Improved Accuracy of Minimally Invasive Transpedicular Screw Placement in the Lumbar Spine With 3-Dimensional Stereotactic Image Guidance: A Comparative Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

This study compares the accuracy rates of lumbar percutaneous pedicle screw placement (PPSP) using either 2-dimensional (2-D) fluoroscopic guidance or 3-dimensional (3-D) stereotactic navigation in the setting of minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). This represents the largest single-operator study of its kind and first comprehensive review of 3-D stereotactic navigation in the setting of MISS.

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in accuracy of lumbar pedicle screw placement using 2-D fluoroscopic navigation and 3-D stereotaxis in the setting of MISS.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Surgeons increasingly rely upon advanced image guidance systems to guide minimally invasive PPSP. Three-dimensional stereotactic navigation with intraoperative computed tomography offers well-documented benefit in open surgical approaches. However, the utility of 3-D stereotaxis in the setting of MISS remains incompletely explored by few studies with limited patient numbers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 599 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive lumbar PPSP aided by 3-D stereotactic navigation. Postoperative imaging and medical records were analyzed for patient demographics, incidence and degree of pedicle breach, and other surgical complications. A total of 2132 screw were reviewed and compared with a meta-analysis created from published data regarding the placement of 4248 fluoroscopically navigated pedicle screws in the setting of MISS.

RESULTS

In the 3-D navigation group, a total of 7 pedicle breaches occurred in 6 patients, corresponding to a per-person breach rate of 1.15% (6/518) and a per-screw breach rate of 0.33% (7/2132). Meta-analysis comprised of data from 10 independent studies showed overall breach risk of 13.1% when 2-D fluoroscopic navigation was utilized in MISS. This translates to a 99% decrease in odds of breach in the 3-D navigation technique versus the traditional 2-D-guided technique, with an odds ratio of 0.01, (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.03), P<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional stereotactic navigation based upon intraoperative computed tomography imaging offers markedly improved accuracy of percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement when used in the setting of MISS.

Comparison of navigated versus non-navigated pedicle screw placement in 260 patients and 1434 screws: screw accuracy, screw size, and the complexity of surgery

OBJECTIVE

Computer 3D navigation (3D NAV) techniques in spinal instrumentation can theoretically improve screw placement accuracy and reduce injury to critical neurovascular structures, especially in complex cases. In this series, we analyze the results of 3D NAV in pedicle screw placement accuracy, screw outer diameter, and case complexity in comparison with screws placed with conventional lateral fluoroscopy.

METHODS

Pedicle screws placed in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine using either standard lateral fluoroscopy or 3D NAV using isocentric fluoroscopy were retrospectively analyzed. The accuracy of each individual screw was graded on a 4-tiered classification system. Screw and pedicle diameter measurements were also made in both cohorts, and case complexity was compared between the 2 cohorts. Complex cases were defined as deformity surgery, re-do cases, and minimally invasive surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 708 screws were placed under 3D NAV guidance and 726 screws were placed without stereotaxy. Eighty-eight percent of 3D NAV-guided pedicle screws were graded nonbreach versus 82% of cases with lateral fluoroscopy (P<0.001). The ratio of screw/pedicle diameter was significantly larger in the 3D NAV cohort (0.71 vs. 0.63, P<0.05). Seventy-six percent of 3D NAV cases had a predefined aspect of complexity, whereas 44% of non-3D NAV cases met criteria to be labeled complex (P<0.001). Reoperation occurred less frequently in 3D NAV cases than fluoroscopy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 3D NAV was associated with improved screw placement accuracy, improved screw-to-pedicle diameter measurements, and was used in cases with a higher degree of surgical complexity. We conclude that 3D NAV is a valuable tool in current spinal instrumentation, especially for more complex surgeries.

Computer-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery: Current State and Future Perspective

Introduced about two decades ago, computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) has emerged as a new and independent area, due to the importance of treatment of musculoskeletal diseases in orthopedics and traumatology, increasing availability of different imaging modalities, and advances in analytics and navigation tools. The aim of this paper is to present the basic elements of CAOS devices and to review state-of-the-art examples of different imaging modalities used to create the virtual representations, of different position tracking devices for navigation systems, of different surgical robots, of different methods for registration and referencing, and of CAOS modules that have been realized for different surgical procedures. Future perspectives will also be outlined.

IMAGE-GUIDED SURGERY IN THE SPINE: NEURONAVIGATION VS. FLUOROSCOPY

Objectives:To evaluate the accuracy and the operative complications of implanting pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine, using computer-assisted surgery compared to the implantation technique using fluoroscopy.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted at the Hospital Universitário Cajuru PUC-PR from January 2000 to January 2009. Two groups of patients undergoing implant pedicle screws were analyzed (n=80). Group I received implant pedicle screws through fluoroscopy technique and group II, through neuronavigation technique. The accuracy of positioning of pedicle screws was evaluated using rating scales.Results:The accuracy was higher in group II, where 77.5% of the screws were correctly positioned, whereas there were only 28.5% in group I (p=0.001). There was a reduction of 95% (CI: 80-97%) in the risk of screws misplacement in group II. The average operation time was 312.2±78.1 minutes in group I and 270.3±41.4 in group II (p=0.004). Blood transfusion was needed in 28 patients in group I and 10 patients in group II (p=0.005), resulting in 64% risk reduction of blood transfusion in group II. Eight patients in group I underwent revision surgery whereas only one patient in the group II, that is, 75% of surgical revision risk reduction.Conclusion:The implantation technique of pedicle screws using neuronavigation is a more accurate method and has less operative complications compared with the technique that uses fluoroscopy.

The evolution of image-guided lumbosacral spine surgery

Techniques and approaches of spinal fusion have considerably evolved since their first description in the early 1900s. The incorporation of pedicle screw constructs into lumbosacral spine surgery is among the most significant advances in the field, offering immediate stability and decreased rates of pseudarthrosis compared to previously described methods. However, early studies describing pedicle screw fixation and numerous studies thereafter have demonstrated clinically significant sequelae of inaccurate surgical fusion hardware placement. A number of image guidance systems have been developed to reduce morbidity from hardware malposition in increasingly complex spine surgeries. Advanced image guidance systems such as intraoperative stereotaxis improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement using a variety of surgical approaches, however their clinical indications and clinical impact remain debated. Beginning with intraoperative fluoroscopy, this article describes the evolution of image guided lumbosacral spinal fusion, emphasizing two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) navigational methods.

Intraoperative image-guided spinal navigation: technical pitfalls and their avoidance

Spinal instrumentation has made significant advances in the last two decades, with transpedicular constructs now widely used in spinal fixation. Pedicle screw constructs are routinely used in thoracolumbar-instrumented fusions, and in recent years, the cervical spine as well. Three-column fixations with pedicle screws provide the most rigid form of posterior stabilization. Surgical landmarks and fluoroscopy have been used routinely for pedicle screw insertion, but a number of studies reveal inaccuracies in placement using these conventional techniques (ranging from 10% to 50%). The ability to combine 3D imaging with intraoperative navigation systems has improved the accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement, especially in more complex spinal deformities. However, in the authors' experience with image guidance in more than 1500 cases, several potential pitfalls have been identified while using intraoperative spinal navigation that could lead to suboptimal results. This article summarizes the authors' experience with these various pitfalls using spinal navigation, and gives practical tips on their avoidance and management.

Introduction: Intraoperative spinal imaging and navigation

Image-guided surgery (IGS) has been evolving since the early 1990s and is now used on a daily basis in the operating theater for spine surgery at many institutions. In the last 5 years, spinal IGS has greatly benefitted from important enhancements including portable intraoperative CT (iCT) coupled with high-speed computerized stereotactic navigation systems and optical-based camera tracking technology.

Navigated pedicle screw placement using computed tomographic data in dorsolumbar fractures

BACKGROUND

Computed tomographic (CT) based navigation is a technique to improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. It is believed to enhance accuracy of pedicle screw placement, potentially avoiding complications arising due to pedicle wall breach. This study aims to assess the results of dorsolumbar fractures operated by this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty consecutive skeletally mature patients of fractures of dorsolumbar spine (T9-L5) were subjected to an optoelectronic navigation system. All patients were thoroughly examined for neurological deficit. The criterion for instability were either a tricolumnar injury or presence of neurological deficit or both. Patients with multilevel fractures and distorted spine were excluded from study. Time taken for insertion of each pedicle screw was recorded and placement assessed with a postoperative CT scan using Laine's grading system.

RESULTS

Only one screw out of a total of 118 screws was misplaced with a Laine's Grade 5 placement, showing a misplacement rate of 0.847%. Average time for matching was 7.8 min (range 5-12 min). Average time taken for insertion of a single screw was 4.19 min (range 2-8 min) and total time for all screws after exposure was 34.23 min (range 24-45 min) for a four screw construct. No neurovascular complications were seen in any of the patients postoperatively and in subsequent followup of 1-year duration.

CONCLUSION

CT-based navigation is effective in improving accuracy of pedicle screw placement in traumatic injuries of dorsolumbar spine (T9-L5), however additional cost of procuring CT scan to the patient and cost of equipment is of significant concern in developing countries. Reduced radiation exposure and lowered ergonomic constraints around the operation table are its additional benefits.

Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion using fluoroscopy-based navigation-assisted surgery : computed tomography postoperative assessment in 96 consecutive patients

Objective

Two-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computerized navigation for the placement of pedicle screws offers the advantage of using stored patient-specific imaging data in providing real-time guidance during screw placement. The study aimed to describe the accuracy and reliability of a fluoroscopy-based navigation system for pedicle screw insertion.

Methods

A total of 477 pedicle screws were inserted in the lower back of 96 consecutive patients between October 2007 and June 2012 using fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted surgery. The accuracy of screw placement was evaluated using a sophisticated computed tomography protocol.

Results

Of the 477 pedicle screws, 461 (96.7%) were judged to be inserted correctly. Frank screw misplacement [16 screws (3.3%)] was observed in 15 patients. Of these, 8 were classified as minimally misplaced (≤2 mm); 3, as moderately misplaced (2.1-4 mm); and 5, as severely misplaced (>4 mm). No complications, including nerve root injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or internal organ injury, were observed in any of the patients.

Conclusion

The accuracy of pedicle screw placement using a fluoroscopy-based computer navigation system was observed to be superior to that obtained with conventional techniques.

Image-guided navigation and video-assisted thoracoscopic spine surgery: the second generation

Object

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has evolved for treatment of a variety of spinal disorders. Early incorporation with image-guided surgery (IGS) was challenged due to reproducibility and adaptability, limiting the procedure's acceptance. In the present study, the authors report their experience with second-generation IGS and VATS technologies for anterior thoracic minimally invasive spinal (MIS) procedures.

Methods

The surgical procedure is described in detail including operating room set-up, patient positioning (a lateral decubitus position), placement of the spinal reference frame and portal, radiographic localization, registration, surgical instruments, and the image-guided thoracoscopic discectomy.

Results

Combined IGS and VATS procedures were successfully performed and assisted in anatomical localization in 14 patients. The mean patient age was 59 years (range 32–73 years). Disc herniation pathology represented the most common indication for surgery (n = 8 patients); intrathoracic spinal tumors were present in 4 patients and the remaining patients had infection and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. All patients required chest tube drainage postoperatively, and all but 1 patient had drainage discontinued the following day. The only complication was a seroma that was presumed to be due to steroid therapy for postoperative weakness. At the final follow-up, 11 of the patients were improved neurologically, 2 patients had baseline neurological status, and the 1 patient with postoperative weakness was able to ambulate, albeit with an assistive device.

The evolution of thoracoscopic surgical procedures occurring over 20 years is presented, including their limitations. The combination of VATS and IGS technologies is discussed including their safety and the importance of 3D imaging. In cases of large open thoracotomy procedures, surgeries require difficult, extensive, and invasive access through the chest cavity; using a MIS procedure can potentially eliminate many of the complications and morbidities associated with large open procedures. The authors report their experience with thoracic spinal surgeries that involved MIS procedures and the new technologies.

Conclusions

The most significant advance in IGS procedures has resulted from intraoperative CT scanning and automatic registration with the IGS workstation. Image guidance can be used in conjunction with VATS techniques for thoracic discectomy, spinal tumors, infection, and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. The authors' initial experience has revealed this technique to be useful and potentially applicable to other MIS procedures.

Tracked ultrasound snapshots in percutaneous pedicle screw placement navigation: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Computerized navigation improves the accuracy of minimally invasive pedicle screw placement during spine surgery. Such navigation, however, exposes both the patient and the staff to radiation during surgery. To avoid intraoperative exposure to radiation, tracked ultrasound snapshots-ultrasound image frames coupled with corresponding spatial positions-could be used to map preoperatively defined screw plans into the intraoperative coordinate frame. The feasibility of such an approach, however, has not yet been investigated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Are there vertebral landmarks that can be identified using tracked ultrasound snapshots? Can tracked ultrasound snapshots allow preoperative pedicle screw plans to be accurately mapped--compared with CT-derived pedicle screw plans--into the intraoperative coordinate frame in a simulated setting?

METHODS

Ultrasound visibility of registration landmarks was checked on volunteers and phantoms. An ultrasound machine with integrated electromagnetic tracking was used for tracked ultrasound acquisition. Registration was performed using 3D Slicer open-source software (www.slicer.org). Two artificial lumbar spine phantoms were used to evaluate registration accuracy of pedicle screw plans using tracked ultrasound snapshots. Registration accuracy was determined by comparing the ultrasound-derived plans with the CT-derived plans.

RESULTS

The four articular processes proved to be identifiable using tracked ultrasound snapshots. Pedicle screw plans were registered to the intraoperative coordinate system using landmarks. The registrations were sufficiently accurate in that none of the registered screw plans intersected the pedicle walls. Registered screw plan positions had an error less than 1.28 ± 1.37 mm (average ± SD) in each direction and an angle difference less than 1.92° ± 1.95° around each axis relative to the CT-derived positions.

CONCLUSIONS

Registration landmarks could be located using tracked ultrasound snapshots and permitted accurate mapping of pedicle screw plans to the intraoperative coordinate frame in a simulated setting.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tracked ultrasound may allow accurate computer-navigated pedicle screw placement while avoiding ionizing radiation in the operating room; however, further studies that compare this approach with other navigation techniques are needed to confirm the practical use of this new approach.

The correlation between cervical range of motion and misplacement of cervical pedicle screws during cervical posterior spinal fixation surgery using a CT-based navigation system

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between cervical range of motion and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) misplacement in cervical posterior spinal fusion surgery using a CT-based navigation system.

METHODS

A total of 46 consecutive patients with cervical posterior spinal fusion surgery using CPSs were evaluated retrospectively. We analyzed the cervical range of motion (ROM) and the misplacement of CPSs that were placed using either separate or single-time multilevel registration with a CT-based navigation system to determine the optimum registration procedure. The screw-inserted vertebra was indicated as Registered vertebra-Pedicle Screw inserted vertebra (Re-PS) = 0, 1, 2, or 3 depending on its distance (level) from the registered vertebra. Grades 0 (no perforation) and 1 (perforations <2 mm) were categorized as "no misplacement." Grades 2 (perforations ≧ 2 mm but < 4 mm) and 3 (perforations ≧ 4 mm) were categorized as "misplacement." We analyzed the correlations between CPS misplacement and Re-PS, and between CPS misplacement and preoperative cervical ROM.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 196 screws in patients having a mean age of 53.2 years (range 5-84 years). Level of insertion relative to registration was Re-PS = 0 in 129 screws, Re-PS = 1 in 53, Re-PS = 2 in 10 and Re-PS = 3 in 4. The misplacement rates were 12.2 % (24 screws) overall, 6.2 % in Re-PS = 0, 22.6 % in Re-PS = 1, 20 % in Re-PS = 2, and 50 % in Re-PS = 3. The rate of CPS misplacement increased significantly with a Re-PS = 1 and a Re-PS = 2 and 3 compared to a Re-PS = 0. There was a significant difference in the cervical ROM in each grade and both misplacement groups: 1.8 in Grade 0, 2.3 in Grade 1, 7.8 in Grade 2, 12.9 in Grade 3, 11 in the misplacement group and 1.9 in the no misplacement group.

CONCLUSIONS

The precision of CPS placement in CT-based navigation surgery was evaluated. The misplacement rate in single-time multilevel registration increased to 23.4 % compared to 6.2 % for separate registration. As the distance increased between the registered level and the level of CPS insertion, the preoperative cervical ROM and the rate of CPS misplacement significantly increased. Thus, the rate of misplacement of CPSs is reduced when performing separate registration. Furthermore, when there is greater preoperative cervical ROM, separate registration would likely improve the safety and accuracy of CPS insertion.

Monitoring image guidance system accuracy during spinal surgery with mini-screw fiducials: technical note

STUDY DESIGN

A technical note.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a technique for measuring accuracy of intraoperative image guidance systems in spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Image guidance may be of use when performing complex procedures on the spine. However, as the operation progresses and, in particular, once any deformity has been corrected, the image guidance system may become unreliable. In practice, this often results in repeated image acquisitions thus increasing the radiation exposure to the patient.

METHODS

Small titanium, cranio-facial screws were placed on the dorsal aspect of the spine intraoperatively, before the acquisition of images and used as fiducials.

RESULTS

The authors were able to accurately discern the true precision of the image guidance system used with an intraoperative computed tomography scanner, throughout the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

By using intraoperatively placed mini-screw fiducials, the surgeon may check and quantify the underlying system accuracy both initially and throughout the surgery. In the future, "auto-adjust" functions may be integrated into the computer software to automatically recalibrate the system when a probe is placed into the fiducials without the need for rescanning.

Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion

Object

In this paper the authors' goal was to compare the accuracy of computer-navigated pedicle screw insertion with nonnavigated techniques in the published literature.

Methods

The authors performed a systematic literature review using the National Center for Biotechnology Information Database (PubMed/MEDLINE) using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms “Neuronavigation,” “Therapy, computer assisted,” and “Stereotaxic techniques,” and the text word “pedicle.” Included in the meta-analysis were randomized control trials or patient cohort series, all of which compared computer-navigated spine surgery (CNSS) and nonassisted pedicle screw insertions. The primary end point was pedicle perforation, while the secondary end points were operative time, blood loss, and complications.

Results

Twenty studies were included for analysis; of which there were 18 cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials published between 2000 and 2011. Foreign-language papers were translated. The total number of screws included was 8539 (4814 navigated and 3725 nonnavigated). The most common indications for surgery were degenerative disease, spinal deformity, myelopathy, tumor, and trauma. Navigational methods were primarily based on CT imaging. All regions of the spine were represented. The relative risk for pedicle screw perforation was determined to be 0.39 (p < 0.001), favoring navigation. The overall pedicle screw perforation risk for navigation was 6%, while the overall pedicle screw perforation risk was 15% for conventional insertion. No related neurological complications were reported with navigated insertion (4814 screws total); there were 3 neurological complications in the nonnavigated group (3725 screws total). Furthermore, the meta-analysis did not reveal a significant difference in total operative time and estimated blood loss when comparing the 2 modalities.

Conclusions

There is a significantly lower risk of pedicle perforation for navigated screw insertion compared with nonnavigated insertion for all spinal regions.

Oblique axis body fracture--pitfalls in management

BACKGROUND

Transverse fractures through the body of the axis, rather than at the base of the odontoid are uncommon and management with an external orthosis is usually recommended. Oblique fractures through the body of the axis accompanying a hangman's fracture have not been reported and are not described as part of any classification system. Such fractures may be at high risk for treatment failure in an external orthosis.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report on a case of an oblique axis fracture that failed treatment with external orthosis. Posterior instrumented fusion was employed successfully using a C1-C3 and C4 poly axial screw rod construct. Frameless stereotaxy and a biomodel were useful surgical adjuncts. Twelve month follow up revealed bony union in an asymptomatic patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Oblique fractures of the body of the axis can displace in a halo-thoracic orthosis. Serial radiological review is required to detect displacement prior to fracture union. Oblique fractures of the body of the axis can be managed surgically with preservation of atlanto-occipital motion, resulting in satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes.

Worldwide survey on the use of navigation in spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) can improve the accuracy of screw placement and decrease radiation exposure, yet this is not widely accepted among spine surgeons. The current viewpoint of spine surgeons on navigation in their everyday practice is an important issue that has not been studied. A survey-based study assessed opinions on CAS to describe the current global attitudes of surgeons on the use of navigation in spine surgery.

METHODS

A 12-item questionnaire focusing on the number and type of surgical cases, the type of equipment available, and general opinions toward CAS was distributed to 3348 AOSpine surgeons (a specialty group within the AO [Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen] Foundation). Latent class analysis was used to investigate the existence of specific groups based on the respondent opinion profiles.

RESULTS

A response rate of 20% was recorded. Despite a widespread distribution of navigation systems in North America and Europe, only 11% of surgeons use it routinely. High-volume procedure surgeons, neurological surgeons, and surgeons with a busy minimal invasive surgery practice are more likely to use CAS. "Routine users" consider the accuracy, potential of facilitating complex surgery, and reduction in radiation exposure as the main advantages. The lack of equipment, inadequate training, and high costs are the main reasons that "nonusers" do not use CAS.

CONCLUSIONS

Spine surgeons acknowledge the value of CAS, yet current systems do not meet their expectations in terms of ease of use and integration into the surgical work flow. To increase its use, CAS has to become more cost efficient and scientific data are needed to clarify its potential benefits.

Navigation of artificial disc replacement: evaluation in a cadaver study

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have shown that total disc replacement (TDR) resulted in significantly better restoration of disc-space height and significantly less subsidence than anterior interbody fusion with BAK cages. Clinical outcomes and flexion/extension range of motion correlated with the accuracy of surgical placement of the CHARITÉ™ artificial disc. False positioning of the artificial disc leads to spondylarthrosis and disc degeneration of the adjacent segment, and exclusive use of a C-arm could cause such false positioning (due to the parallax effect). The objective of this study was to test and evaluate the accuracy of navigated artificial disc replacement as performed by a spine surgeon without a prior learning curve. In each case, the placement position achieved by the surgeon was compared with the preoperatively planned position for that specimen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lumbar intervertebral disc prostheses (CHARITÉ™ , DePuy Spine) were placed using an image guidance technique (BrainLAB VectorVision system) in ten human cadaveric spine specimens. A total of 15 such disc replacements were performed using navigation. Post-instrumentation accuracy was assessed by a computer on the basis of CT scans.

RESULTS

The placement of the disc was assessed as ideal (<3 mm from the planned position), suboptimal (3-5 mm from the planned position) or poor (>5 mm from the planned position). Only three disc prostheses were placed suboptimally, and none was poorly placed. Placement in the coronal plane was significantly better than in the other planes.

DISCUSSION

Navigation is a useful instrument in the hands of the spine surgeon, enabling an ideal placement of the disc prosthesis. Navigation offers greater accuracy and less inter-procedural variation than standard fluoroscopy (due to the parallax effect). As accurate (ideal or suboptimal) placement correlates with good clinical outcome, further clinical studies on the navigation of TDR are essential. In this present study, the disc replacement was performed by a surgeon without experience in total disc replacement, indicating that prior completion of a learning curve was not essential.

Accuracy of Image-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based Navigation With Automated Referencing, Part I: Cervicothoracic Spine

BACKGROUND:

Image-guided spinal instrumentation reduces the incidence of implant misplacement.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the accuracy of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT)-based neuronavigation (iCT-N).

METHODS:

In 35 patients (age range, 18-87 years), a total of 248 pedicle screws were placed in the cervical (C1-C7) and upper and midthoracic (T1-T8) spine. An automated iCT registration sequence was used for multisegmental instrumentation, with the reference frame fixed to either a Mayfield head clamp and/or the most distal spinous process within the instrumentation. Pediculation was performed with navigated drill guides or Jamshidi cannulas. The angular deviation between navigated tool trajectory and final implant positions (evaluated on postinstrumentation iCT or postoperative CT scans) was calculated to assess the accuracy of iCT-N. Final screw positions were also graded according to established classification systems. Mean follow-up was 16.7 months.

RESULTS:

Clinically significant screw misplacement or iCT-N failure mandating conversion to conventional technique did not occur. A total of 71.4% of patients self-rated their outcome as excellent or good at 12 months; 99.3% of cervical screws were compliant with Neo classification grades 0 and 1 (grade 2, 0.7%), and neurovascular injury did not occur. In addition, 97.8% of thoracic pedicle screws were assigned grades I to III of the Heary classification, with 2.2% grade IV placement. Accuracy of iCT-N progressively deteriorated with increasing distance from the spinal reference clamp but allowed safe instrumentation of up to 10 segments.

CONCLUSION:

Image-guided spinal instrumentation using iCT-N with automated referencing allows safe, highly accurate multilevel instrumentation of the cervical and upper and midthoracic spine. In addition, iCT-N significantly reduces the need for reregistration in multilevel surgery.

Clinical and methodological precision of spinal navigation assisted by 3D intraoperative O-arm radiographic imaging

OBJECT

In recent years, the importance of intraoperative navigation in neurosurgery has been increasing. Multiple studies have proven the advantages and safety of computer-assisted spinal neurosurgery. The use of intraoperative 3D radiographic imaging to acquire image information for navigational purposes has several advantages and should increase the accuracy and safety of screw guidance with navigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and methodological precision of navigated spine surgery in combination with the O-arm multidimensional imaging system.

METHODS

Thoracic, lumbar, and sacral pedicle screws that were placed with the help of the combination of the O-arm and StealthStation TREON plus navigation systems were analyzed. To evaluate clinical precision, 278 polyaxial pedicle screws in 139 vertebrae were reviewed for medial or caudal perforations on coronal projection. For the evaluation of the methodological accuracy, virtual and intraoperative images were compared, and the angulation of the pedicle screw to the midsagittal line was measured.

RESULTS

Pedicle perforations were recorded in 3.2% of pedicle screws. None of the perforated pedicle screws damaged a nerve root. The difference in angulation between the actual and virtual pedicle screws was 2.8° ± 1.9°.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the StealthStation TREON plus navigation system in combination with the O-arm system showed the highest accuracy for spinal navigation compared with other studies that used traditional image acquisition and registration for navigation.

Nanoimaging and neurological surgery

Over 32 million surgical procedures are performed in the United States each year. Increasingly, image guidance is used in order to aid in the surgical localization of pathology, minimization of incisions, and improvement of surgical intervention outcomes. A variety of imaging modalities using different portions of the electromagnetic spectrum are used in neurological surgery. These include wavelengths used in ultrasonography, optical, infrared, ionizing radiation, and magnetic resonance. The use of currently available image-guidance tools for neurological surgery is reviewed. Advances in nanoparticulates and their integration into the neurosurgical operating room environment are discussed.

Cost-effectiveness of image-guided spine surgery

Objective:

To determine if image-guided spine surgery is cost effective.

Methods:

A prospective case series of the first 100 patients undergoing thoracolumbar pedicle screw instrumentation under image-guidance was compared to a retrospective control group of the last 100 patients who underwent screw placement prior to the use of image-guidance. The image-guidance system was NaviVision (Vector Vision-BrainLAB) and Arcadis Orbic (Siemens).

Results:

The rate of revision surgery was reduced from 3% to 0% with the use of image guidance (p=0.08). The cost savings of image guidance for the placement of pedicle screws was $71,286 per 100 cases. Time required for pedicle screw placement with image guidance was 20 minutes for 2 screws, 29 minutes for 4 screws, 38 minutes for 6 screws, and 50 min for 8 screws. Cost savings for the time required for placement of pedicle screws with image guidance can be estimated by subtracting the time required with currently used techniques without image guidance from the above averages, then multiplying by $93 per minute. The approximate costs of the navigation system is $475,000 ( $225,000 for Vector Vision-BrainLAB and $250,000 for Arcadis Orbic-Siemens).

Conclusion:

Image guidance for the placement of pedicle screws may be cost effective in spine practices with heavy volume, that perform surgery in difficult cases, and that require long surgical times for the placement of pedicle screws.

Os odontoideum: etiology and surgical management

OBJECTIVE

Os odontoideum is an independent ossicle of variable size with smooth circumferential cortical margins separated from the foreshortened odontoid peg. The etiology of os odontoideum remains controversial, but there is now emerging consensus on the traumatic etiology of os odontoideum rather than a congenital source.

RESULTS

We reviewed the literature of os odontoideum. Patients with this condition can be asymptomatic or present with wide range of neurological dysfunctions. Although the diagnosis of os odontoideum can be made with plain x-rays, further imaging modalities including magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography angiography have improved the preoperative planning.

CONCLUSION

There is a role for conservative treatment of an asymptomatic incidentally found, radiologically stable, and noncompressive os odontoideum. Conversely, surgery has a definite role in symptomatic cases. The main method of surgical treatment today is posterior decompression after reduction and fusion via independent C1 and C2 instrumentation. Irreducible, persistent anterior compression from os odontoideum can be approached by a transoral route with good results in experienced hands.

Intraoperative computed tomography image-guided navigation for posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation in spinal deformity surgery

OBJECT

Placement of thoracolumbar pedicle screws in spinal deformity surgery has a reported inaccuracy rate as high as 30%. At present, image-guided navigation systems designed to improve instrumentation accuracy typically use intraoperative fluoroscopy or preoperative CT scans. The authors report the prospective evaluation of the accuracy of posterior thoracolumbar spinal instrumentation using a new intraoperative CT operative suite with an integrated image guidance system. They compare the accuracy of thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement using intraoperative CT image guidance with instrumentation placement utilizing fluoroscopy.

METHODS

Between December 2007 and July 2008, 12 patients underwent posterior spinal instrumentation for spinal deformity correction using intraoperative CT-based image guidance. An intraoperative CT scan of the sterile surgical field was obtained after decompression and before instrumentation. Instrumentation was placed, and a postinstrumentation CT scan was obtained before wound closure to assess the accuracy of instrumentation placement and the potential need for revision. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was later reviewed and recorded by independent observers. A comparison group of 14 patients who underwent thoracolumbar instrumentation utilizing fluoroscopy and postoperative CT scanning during the same time period was evaluated and included in this analysis.

RESULTS

In the intraoperative CT-based image guidance group, a total of 164 thoracolumbar pedicle screws were placed. Two screws were found to have breached the pedicle wall (1.2%). Neither screw was deemed to need revision due to misplacement. In the comparison group, 211 pedicle screws were placed. Postoperative CT scanning revealed that 11 screws (5.2%) had breached the pedicle. One patient in the fluoroscopy group awoke with a radiculopathy attributed to a misplaced screw, which required revision. The difference in accuracy was statistically significant (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative CT-based image guidance for placement of thoracolumbar instrumentation has an accuracy that exceeds reported rates with other image guidance systems, such as virtual fluoroscopy and 3D isocentric C-arm-based stereotactic systems. Furthermore, with the use of intraoperative CT scanning, a postinstrumentation CT scan allows the surgeon to evaluate the accuracy of instrumentation before wound closure and revise as appropriate.

Intra-operative MRI-assisted spinal localization

BACKGROUND

Level localization in the thoracic spine can be problematic. We describe a new method that can be used in difficult cases, e.g., ones where lesions are mid-thoracic, small, or only visible on MRI.

METHODS

Intra-operatively, a midline incision was made and the thoracic spinous processes were exposed. A length of contrast-filled tubing was wound around the processes and the incision was temporarily closed and the patient was transferred to the radiology department for MRI under general anesthetic. Upon return to theatre, the cross sections of contrast-filled tubing and the lesion itself were visible on the MRI scan, allowing localization of the level.

FINDINGS

This method was accurate and minimized the extent of bone removal required for access.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique, while not appropriate in every case, is repeatable, and does not require specialized equipment or training. It is an extremely accurate method of localization for difficult cases.

Accuracy of multilevel registration in image-guided pedicle screw insertion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of multilevel registration for skip pedicle screw placement during image-guided, computer-assisted spine surgery, in the setting of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Computerized frameless stereotactic image-guidance has been used recently to improve pedicle screw placement accurately and safety during spine surgery. Because of possible intervertebral motion and usual difference in patients' position between preoperative imaging and surgery, the imaging model and the surgically exposed spine may be significantly discordant. Consequently, current protocols suggested separate registration of each spinal level (single-level registration) before respective pedicle screw placement, a time-consuming process. Moreover, although multilevel registration for lumbar spine has been reported, and that for thoracic spine has not.

METHODS

A total of 19 patients (1 male and 18 females; mean age, 13.9 years) with AIS who underwent multilevel registration for skip pedicle screw placement were included. Variables including surgical time, blood loss, preoperative and 2-year postoperative Cobb angle, correction rate, and postoperative screw position by computed tomography image were evaluated. Mean registration error after point merge and again after surface merge were recorded for each consecutive vertebra of each case.

RESULTS

Mean surgical time was 310 minutes (range, 168-420 min). Mean blood loss 1138 g (range, 300-2300 g). Cobb angle before operation and at 2 years postoperation was 62.4 degrees (43 degrees-100 degrees) and 21.6 degrees (9 degrees-42 degrees), respectively. Mean correction rate 66.2% (39.7%-84.5%). Total 265 screws were inserted with computed tomography-based navigation system. Pedicle violation was observed in only 4 screws (1.5%). No neurovascular complication occurred. After point merge, average Mean registration error of all cases was 1.69 +/- 0.52 mm, and after surface merge was 0.51 +/- 0.16 mm.

CONCLUSION

Multilevel registration may decrease operative time without compromising accuracy of pedicle screw placement afforded by this technique in the setting of AIS.

Image-guided multilevel vertebral osteotomies for en bloc resection of giant cell tumor of the thoracic spine: case report and description of operative technique

The use of frameless stereotactic navigation is gaining popularity in spinal surgery. Although initially used in the spine for placement of lumbar pedicle screws, this technology has expanded to facilitate placement of spinal instrumentation at virtually all spinal levels. While previous reports have described the utility of image guidance for placement of spinal instrumentation, its use in assisting with resection of complex spine tumors has not been extensively reported. Here we describe the use of frameless stereotaxy to guide a complex, four-level sagittal vertebral osteotomy for en bloc resection of a giant cell tumor involving the chest wall and thoracic spine.